Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Research Articles

Abstract CT090: DAREON™-7: A phase 1, open-label, dose escalation and expansion cohort trial of the delta-like ligand (DLL3)-targeting T-cell engager BI 764532, plus first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with DLL3-positive (+) neuroendocrine carcinomas

Abstract Background Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) have limited treatment options. DLL3 is highly expressed in NECs and is a promising treatment target. In an ongoing phase 1 trial (NCT04429087), BI 764532, a DLL3/CD3 IgG-like T-cell engager, was tolerable with clinical activity in patients with DLL3-positive (+) tumors, including those with small cell lung cancer and other NECs. Purpose DAREON™-7 (NCT06132113), a phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation (Part A) and dose-expansion (Part B) trial, aims to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose for expansion (RDE)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and the safety and efficacy of BI 764532 + platinum and etoposide in patients with DLL3+ NEC. Experimental design Part A: ~25 patients will receive intravenous BI 764532 (target dose after step-in dosing) plus carboplatin/etoposide (CE) until intolerable toxicity, or progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or for a maximum of 36 months. BI 764532 dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control. Part B: 2 cohorts (~15 patients each) will receive BI 764532 at the RDE/RP2D + CE or cisplatin/etoposide (carboplatin/etoposide or cisplatin/etoposide are the most-used standard of care [SOC] regimens). Key inclusion criteria: patients must have no prior systemic treatment for DLL3+ locally advanced or metastatic NEC (extrapulmonary or unknown primary) or large cell NEC of the lung except for 1 cycle of standard platinum/etoposide regimen as first-line treatment prior to entering the treatment period of the trial; patients with localized NEC or resectable disease who received prior adjuvant therapy can participate in the trial if they experienced a treatment-free interval of >6 months prior to the diagnosis of metastatic disease; and patients must have at least 1 measurable lesion as defined per RECIST v1.1. Patients must be adequate candidates to receive platinum/etoposide as the SOC treatment. Primary endpoints: occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the MTD evaluation (Part A) and on-treatment (Part B) periods. Secondary endpoints: occurrence of DLTs and adverse events during the on-treatment period (Part B), and efficacy measured by objective response and duration of response (Part B). Enrollment is ongoing. Citation Format: Jaume Capdevila, Timon Vandamme, Patricia Niccoli, Saori Mishima, Ken Kato, Yiyuan Ma, Ping Sun, Lijiang Geng, Ulrich M. Lauer. DAREON™-7: A phase 1, open-label, dose escalation and expansion cohort trial of the delta-like ligand (DLL3)-targeting T-cell engager BI 764532, plus first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with DLL3-positive (+) neuroendocrine carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT090.

Value of surgery combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in locally advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Objective: To evaluate the surgery combined chemotherapy and radiation in locally advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) . Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. Locally advanced NECC patients admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Acadmy of Medical Sciences from January 2011 to April 2022 were enrolled. They were divided into concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, and surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiation group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence rate, and mortality rate. Results: (1) Forty-six cases were included, 22 in concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, 24 in surgery combined chemotherapy and radiation group. With 16 patients (35%, 16/46) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), the NACT effective rate was 15/16. (2) The median follow-up time was 27.5 months (range: 10-106 months), with 26 (57%, 26/46) experienced recurrences. There were 4 (9%, 4/46) pelvic recurrences and 25 (54%, 25/46) distant recurrences, and 3 (7%, 3/46) both pelvic and distant recurrences. Compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, surgery combined chemotherapy and radiation group had lower pelvic recurrence rate [14% (3/22) vs 4% (1/24); χ2=1.296, P=0.255] but without statistic difference. Both groups had similar distant recurrence rate [55% (12/22) vs 54% (13/24); χ2=0.001, P=0.979] and overall recurrence rate [59% (13/22) vs 54% (13/24); χ2=0.113, P=0.736]. (3) During the follow-up period, 22 cases (48%, 22/46) died, with 11 cases (50%, 11/22) in concurrent chemoradiotherapy group and 11 cases (46%, 11/24) in surgery combined chemotherapy and radiation group, without significant difference (χ2=0.080, P=0.777). The postoperative 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 62.3% and 36.9%. Compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, the patients in surgery combined chemotherapy and radiation group showed an extended trend in PFS (17.0 vs 32.0 months) and OS (37.0 vs 50.0 months) but without statistic differences (P=0.287, P=0.125). Both groups had similar 3-year OS rate (54.2% vs 69.9%; P=0.138) and 5-year OS rate (36.1% vs 38.8%; P=0.217). Conclusions: Our study supports the multi-modality treatment strategy (including surgery, chemotherapy and radiation) as an important component in the treatment of locally advanced NECC. The combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation seems to have advantages in the treatment of locally advanced NECC, but needs to be confirmed by further multicenter studies.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Carboplatin-Etoposide and Cisplatin-Etoposide Combination Therapy in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and is generally treated with platinum and etoposide combination therapy as first-line chemotherapy. However, it remains uncertain whether carboplatin and etoposide combination therapy (CE) and cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy (PE) have comparable treatment efficacy. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of CE and PE in patients with NEC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patient’s clinical record from 2005 to 2022 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital. Patients who received either CE or PE were included in the study. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 16.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results: A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 73 patients assigned to the CE group and 31 patients assigned to the PE group. Statistically, the response rate, progression-free survival time and overall survival time were 42.6%, 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.5–6.3) and 13.6 months (95% CI: 8.9–17.4), respectively, in the CE groups and 44.4%, 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.1–7.0) and 12.5 months (95% CI: 11.2–14.6), respectively, in the PE groups. There was no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the CE and the PE groups. However, the number of patients with elevated creatinine (3.35 mg/dL and 3.88 mg/dL in 2 patients, respectively) was significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group. Conclusion: The efficacy of CE and PE in patients with NEC is comparable. However, the incidence of renal dysfunction was found to be significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group.

1202P Final analysis of TENEC trial: A phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) as second-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in patients (pts) with a poor performance status (PS)

1202P Final analysis of TENEC trial: A phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) as second-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) in patients (pts) with a poor performance status (PS)

Paclitaxel-carboplatin plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective case series.

There is no conclusive data on the prognosis of patients who receive paclitaxel-carboplatin (TC) plus bevacizumab therapy for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the uterine cervix, a rare histological subtype of cervical cancer. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of TC chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and bevacizumab single maintenance therapy for advanced NEC of the cervix. This was a retrospective review of patients who received TC plus bevacizumab therapy for metastatic, recurrent, or persistent NEC of the cervix at seven institutions between 2015 and 2020. Relevant data were extracted from the patients' medical records and analyzed. Seven patients, including six with small-cell NEC and one with large-cell NEC, were included for analysis. Three patients received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy following TC plus bevacizumab therapy, whereas four patients did not receive bevacizumab single maintenance therapy. The median overall survival and progression-free survival of the patients who received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy were longer than those of the patients who did not receive the therapy (34 months vs. 10.5 months and 19 months vs. 5 months, respectively). However, the patients who received bevacizumab single maintenance therapy had received cisplatin-based chemotherapy previously. On the premise that cisplatin-based chemotherapy is administered as the first-line treatment for advanced NEC of the cervix, bevacizumab single maintenance therapy following TC plus bevacizumab may be considered the second- or third-line treatment. However, the risk of adverse events, such as intestinal perforation, should be discussed with patients.

Clinical features and prognosis of advanced intra- and extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas.

We examined the clinical features and prognosis of advanced intra- and extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) to offer additional guidance for the clinical treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), which is a type of advanced intrapulmonary NEC (IPNECs). The clinical data and survival of 123 patients with advanced IPNECs and extrapulmonary NECs (EPNECs) were obtained. We retrospectively examined the corresponding clinical diagnosis and treatment and investigated the significant factors influencing the survival prognosis of patients with NECs. There were 90 cases of IPNECs (including 81 cases of SCLC), and 33 cases of EPNECs. The median overall survival (OS) of IPNECs was significantly longer than that of the EPNECs in the gastrointestinal tract and in the other regions (P < 0.05). The median OS of patients with other IPNECs was longer than that of patients with SCLC (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, liver metastasis, number of cycles of first-line chemotherapy, and chest radiotherapy were risk factors influencing OS in patients with NECs (P < 0.05). The survival of IPNECs was significantly longer than that of EPNECs in the gastrointestinal tract and other regions. Nevertheless, patients with advanced NECs who were older and had liver metastases had a poorer prognosis. Multidisciplinary treatments including multicycle chemotherapy and a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should function significantly in extending the survival of NECs.

LBA46 Bevacizumab (B) plus FOLFIRI after failure of platinum-etoposide in patients (pts) with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC): The PRODIGE 41-BEVANEC randomized phase II study

Platinum-etoposide combination chemotherapy is the first-line standard-of-care for pts with advanced, poorly-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NEC. However, nearly all pts will develop resistance and there is no standard second-line treatment. PRODIGE 41 – BEVANEC (NCT02820857) is an academic, non-comparative, phase 2 trial. Main inclusion criteria were histologically proven, grade 3, locally advanced or metastatic GEP-NEC or NEC of unknown primary, and documented progressive disease during or after first-line therapy. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive 5 mg/kg Bevacizumab (B) with FOLFIRI, or FOLFIRI alone, every 14 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to demonstrate a 6-month overall survival (OS) rate of ≥50% in the experimental arm (efficacy: if at least 26 of 52pts alive at 6 months), power, 85%; one-sided alpha risk, 10%). Other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), response duration, biochemical response and safety. From Sep 2017 to Feb 2022, 133 pts were randomized in 26 centers; 126 pts received at least one course of chemotherapy and were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Median age was 67 years (range 26–85), 66% males, 90% with ECOG PS 0-1. The primary tumor was mainly colorectal (n=38), pancreas (n=33), oesogastric (n=22) and unknown (=23). The primary objective was met (30 pts alive at 6 months ± 5 pts still in follow-up less than 6 months) with Folfiri-B. Median PFS and OS were 3.7 months (95%CI [1.9-5.6]) and 7.0 months (95%CI [4.6-11.5]) with Folfiri-B, and 3.5 months (95%CI [1.9-5.1]) and 8.9 months (95%CI [5.7-10.7]) with Folfiri. Biochemical response, ORR (25.5% vs 18.3%) and response duration were numerically higher in Folfiri-B vs Folfiri. Three patients stopped B because of toxicity; one treatment-related death occurred in Folfiri-B and most frequent grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (12%), asthenia (10%) and diarrhoea (10%). Folfiri-B reached the primary endpoint in 2nd line NECs pts.

890MO Mutation spectrum in liquid versus solid biopsies from advanced digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma patients

Digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) are currently defined by the presence of a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine phenotype and a high proliferation rate (Ki-67>20%). Most digestive NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease with survival less than 1 year if medically treated. Frequently only minor biopsies are available for further molecular diagnostics. The molecular characteristics of digestive NEC has recently been described, but data on applicability of liquid biopsies in digestive NEC is very limited. We performed massive parallel sequencing of 76 cancer related genes in plasma ctDNA from 50 patients with advanced digestive NEC and compared findings to previous analyses performed in matched FFPE tumour biopsies. Optimal filters were used, including data from WBC as filter for removal of SNPs. Among the 50 patients, 46 had metastatic disease and 4 locoregional disease at the time of plasma sampling. We detected a total of 178 somatic mutations in the liquid biopsies. Out of these, 127 (71%) were also detected in the solid biopsies. In the same 76 genes, we previously detected 199 somatic mutations (SNVs) in the tumor biopsies. Thus, 64% (127 out of 199) of mutations in solid biopsies were also found in the liquid biopsies. The concordance was higher in patients with liver metastases (p= p=1.5x10-5), while it was similar between digestive NEC with different primary sites, except for a lower concordance in esophageal cases (p=0.001). Concordance was not associated with tumor mutational burden (TMB). Tumour tissue mutations also detected in liquid biopsies was lower for MSI (40%) versus MSS tumours (70%; p=7.8x10-4). Applying a predefined set of criteria, we identified potentially targetable mutations in plasma of 26 (52%) of digestive NEC patients; 9 patients (18%) had potentially targetable mutation detected only in liquid biopsies. We found liquid biopsy analyses to be an applicable alternative to solid biopsies in digestive NEC patients. Liquid biopsies could be used for biomarker assessment in clinical trials for these patients.

Effectiveness of Etoposide and Cisplatin vs Irinotecan and Cisplatin Therapy for Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Digestive System

Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) and irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) are commonly used as community standard regimens for advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). To identify whether EP or IP is a more effective regimen in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NEC of the digestive system. This open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled chemotherapy-naive patients aged 20 to 75 years who had recurrent or unresectable NEC (according to the 2010 World Health Organization classification system) arising from the gastrointestinal tract, hepatobiliary system, or pancreas. Participants were enrolled across 50 institutions in Japan between August 8, 2014, and March 6, 2020. In the EP arm, etoposide (100 mg/m2/d on days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2/d on day 1) were administered every 3 weeks. In the IP arm, irinotecan (60 mg/m2/d on days 1, 8, and 15) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2/d on day 1) were administered every 4 weeks. The primary end point was OS. In total, data from 170 patients were analyzed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (median OS of 8 and 12 months in inferior and superior arms, respectively) with a 2-sided α of 10% and power of 80%. The pathologic findings were centrally reviewed following treatment initiation. Among the 170 patients included (median [range] age, 64 [29-75] years; 117 [68.8%] male), median OS was 12.5 months in the EP arm and 10.9 months in the IP arm (HR, 1.04; 90% CI, 0.79-1.37; P = .80). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 (95% CI, 4.1-6.9) months in the EP arm and 5.1 (95% CI, 3.3-5.7) months in the IP arm (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.78-1.45). A subgroup analysis of OS demonstrated that EP produced more favorable OS in patients with poorly differentiated NEC of pancreatic origin (HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 1.26-13.31). The common grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the EP vs IP arms were neutropenia (75 of 82 [91.5%] patients vs 44 of 82 [53.7%] patients), leukocytopenia (50 of 82 [61.0%] patients vs 25 of 82 [30.5%] patients), and febrile neutropenia (FN) (22 of 82 [26.8%] patients vs 10 of 82 [12.2%] patients). While incidence of FN was initially high in the EP arm, primary prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor effectively reduced the incidence of FN. Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrate that both EP and IP remain the standard first-line chemotherapy options. Although AEs were generally manageable, grade 3 and 4 AEs were more common in the EP arm. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs031180005; UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000014795.

Case reports: chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare subtype of malignant gallbladder tumor. Although surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy for gallbladder NEC, most cases are surgically unresectable because of advanced stage disease and/or biologically aggressive behavior. The standard palliative treatment for malignant gallbladder tumors is chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of gallbladder tumors is controversial. Here, we report a case of gallbladder NEC that showed a durable response to chemoradiotherapy. A 68-year-old Japanese man presented with a huge gallbladder tumor with liver and duodenal invasion. Pathological findings revealed poorly differentiated NEC of the gallbladder. After seven cycles of chemotherapy comprising cisplatin and irinotecan, computed tomography (CT) revealed remarkable tumor shrinkage, but an enlarged portal lymph node. The patient was treated with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with two cycles of cisplatin and etoposide. After chemoradiotherapy, the enlarged lymph node also decreased in size. Maximum standardized uptake value of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT(FDG-PET/CT) changed from 8.2 to physiological accumulation. We defined this condition as a complete response on both enhanced CT and FDG-PET/CT; therefore, we did not perform systemic treatment and only observed his condition. This patient remained healthy with no recurrence at 3 years after chemoradiotherapy.

Platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e16217 Background: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a poorly differentiated pathological neuroendocrine neoplasm exhibiting aggressive clinical behaviors; the most common extrapulmonary site is the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system. Treatment strategies for GEP-NEC are primarily based on those employed for small cell lung cancer, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy, such as platinum plus etoposide (EP) or platinum plus irinotecan (IP), has been widely used as initial systemic therapy for patients with advanced/metastatic disease; however, clinical data for GEP-NEC are chiefly derived from small-scale retrospective studies, and the reported efficacy is heterogenous among studies. Methods: We conducted a systematic database search using PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE. Eligible studies included randomized trials, single-arm trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies documenting the clinical efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy (EP and IP) for advanced GEP-NEC. The pooled overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were calculated and weighted using generic inverse variance in a random-effects meta-analysis model. Results: Based on initial screening and eligibility assessment, 19 studies with a combined total of 1,157 patients were identified through a systematic review. Studies included 3 comparative studies between EP and IP with 1 randomized phase II trial and 2 retrospective studies. The pooled ORR in all patients who received the platinum-doublet regimen was 49.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.8–56.5), and subgroup analysis for EP and IP groups showed ORRs of 44.4% (95% CI, 35.9–53.0) and 59.4% (95% CI, 48.0–70.8), respectively. According to the three studies directly comparing EP to IP, the odds ratio of ORR using EP as reference was 1.95 (95% CI, 0.86–4.39, P = 0.11). The pooled median OS in all patients who received the platinum-doublet regimen was 12.9 (95% CI, 10.9–15.3) months, where EP and IP subgroups had median OS of 12.9 (95% CI, 10.8–15.4) and 12.9 (95% CI, 6.0–27.8) months, respectively. The pooled median PFS was 5.4 (95% CI, 4.5–6.4) months in all patients with platinum-regimen, 5.4 (95% CI, 4.5–6.5) months in the EP subgroup, and 4.0 (95% CI, 1.4–11.7) months in IP subgroup, respectively. Conclusions: This study was the first systematic review and meta-analysis assessing patients with GEP-NEC; it has revealed considerable ORR following platinum-doublet chemotherapy. EP and IP regimens can be reasonably employed in patients with advanced GEP-NEC. These results can serve as reference information for clinicians in deciding a suitable chemotherapy regimen. Larger randomized trials and individual patient data meta-analyses are warranted to obtain robust clinical evidence.

REGOMUNE: Phase II study of regorafenib plus avelumab in solid tumors—Results of the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) cohort.

4125 Background: There is no standard treatment for patients (pts) with advanced extra-pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and carcinomas (NEC) after failure of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. PD-1/PD-L1 expression is frequent in these tumors. Combining anti-PD1/PDL1 agents with anti-angiogenics has been shown to be synergistic in several tumor models. Methods: This is a single-arm open-label multicentric phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of regorafenib (R) (160 mg QD 3weeks/4) + Avelumab (A) (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) combination in pts with advanced or metastatic grade 2 or 3 (G2/3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-NET or GEP-NEC. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate, based on central review according to RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included: 1-year progression free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival (OS), and Safety using NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Correlative studies were planned from pts tumor samples obtained at baseline. Results: Between May 2019 and Apr. 2021, 46 pts were enrolled in 6 centers. Median age was 63 (range 31 – 80). 10 pts presented with a NEC and 36 pts with a G2/3 NET. Median follow-up was 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.3 - 9.6). Median number of previous treatment lines was: 2 (range 0 – 8). 39 (84.8%) pts experienced at least 1 dose modification or treatment interruption. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were : Hypertension (13% of pts), fatigue (13%), and diarrhea (11%). One death was related to the treatment. Among the 42 assessable pts, 7 (16.7%) achieved a partial response: 6 pts with a G2/3 NET and 1 patient with a NEC. 22 (52.4%) pts demonstrated stable disease, 22 (52.4%) pts had tumor shrinkage and 10 (23.8%) pts had progressive disease. 3 (7.1%) pts were inevaluable as per RECIST. The median duration of response was 15.5 months (95%CI: 3.7 - not reached (NR)). The median PFS and OS were 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.6 – 9.2) and NR respectively. One year OS rate was 69.4 % (95% CI: 45.1 % – 84.5 %). Conclusions: REGOMUNE is the largest prospective study ever conducted in pts with grade 2/3 GEP-NET or GEP-NEC refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The R+A combination has significant clinical activity in pts with refractory disease. Full Biomarkers analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03475953.

Platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPlatinum-doublet chemotherapy has been conventionally used for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) but evidence of chemotherapy is based on studies with small sample sizes and remains scarce. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy for advanced GEP-NEC.MethodsWe performed a database search in PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE. Eligible studies were prospective and retrospective studies documenting the efficacy of platinum plus etoposide (EP) and platinum plus irinotecan (IP) for advanced GEP-NEC. Overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were pooled and weighted using generic inverse variance in a random-effects meta-analysis model.ResultsNineteen studies including 1157 patients were identified. The ORR of the platinum-doublet regimen, EP, and IP was 49.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.8–56.5), 44.4% (95% CI: 35.9–53.0), and 59.4% (95% CI: 48.0–70.8). The pooled median OS of the platinum-doublet regimen, EP, and IP was 12.9 months (95% CI:10.9–15.3), 12.9 months (95% CI: 10.8–15.4), and 12.9 months (95% CI: 6.0–27.8), and the pooled median PFS of the platinum-doublet regimen, EP, and IP was 5.4 months (95% CI: 4.5–6.4), 5.4 months (95% CI 4.5–6.5), and 4.0 months (95% CI: 1.4–11.7), respectively.ConclusionConsiderable response rate and survival time of the platinum-doublet regimen for advanced GEP-NEC were observed. IP and EP regimens can be reasonably applicable and these results provide a reference for oncologists in deciding the suitable regimen for patients with advanced GEP-NEC.

Randomized phase III study of etoposide plus cisplatin versus irinotecan plus cisplatin in advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the digestive system: A Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG1213).

501 Background: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) arising in the digestive system is a rare and high-grade malignant tumor. Treatment guidelines for advanced NEC recommend platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) and irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP) are commonly used as community standard regimens for NEC. However, it is unknown which is more effective. This phase III study aimed to identify more effective regimen between EP and IP in terms of overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced NEC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable, histologically confirmed NEC (WHO2010) arising from the gastrointestinal tract (GI), hepatobiliary and pancreas (HBP), ECOG PS of 0-1, age of 20–75 years. In the EP arm, etoposide (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) were administered every 3 weeks. In the IP arm, irinotecan (60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) were repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was OS. Total of 140 patients (114 events) were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.67 (median OS; 8/12 months in inferior/superior arms) with a two-sided alpha of 10% and power of 70%. Due to a rapid accrual, the sample size was increased to 170 (power of 80%). Pathology was centrally reviewed after the start of treatment. Results: Of all enrolled 170 patients (GI: 100, HBP: 70) from Aug 2014 to March 2020, median OS was 12.5 months in EP and 10.9 months in IP (HR 1.043 [a ratio of EP to IP], 90% CI, 0.794-1.370, p= 0.797). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months in EP and 5.1 months in IP (HR 1.060, 95% CI, 0.777-1.445). Response rate (RR) was 54.5% (42/77) in EP and 52.5% (42/80) in IP among patients with target lesions. No interactions with OS, PFS, or RR were seen in pre-planned subgroup analyses including primary organs or pathological findings. The common Grade 3-4 AEs (EP/IP) was neutropenia (91.5%/53.7%), leukocytopenia (61.0%/30.5%), and febrile neutropenia (26.8%/12.2%). Conclusions: A superiority was not demonstrated, which indicates that both EP and IP remain standard first-line chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000014795.

Multicenter retrospective study of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: RAM-NEC study (WJOG13420G).

511 Background: Platinum-based systemic chemotherapy (CTx) is recommended for poorly differentiated advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC). As second-line CTx various regimens are adopted according to the guidelines of GI adenocarcinoma or small cell lung cancer in daily practice. Recently, some clinical and preclinical reports suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors are effective against NEC. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of ramucirumab (RAM, anti-VEGF receptor 2 antibody)-containing CTx. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated gastric (G-) or colorectal (C-) NEC patients previously treated with first-line platinum-based CTx followed by second-line CTx between March 2015 and June 2020 (G-NEC) or between May 2016 and June 2020 (C-NEC). The main inclusion criteria were ECOG performance status (PS) of 0–2, pathologically diagnosed as G or C- NEC or mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma. We compared the efficacy of RAM-containing CTx as second- or later-line treatment (Group A) with that of CTx without RAM as second-line treatment (Group B). A Cox proportional hazard model and inverse probability weighting of propensity scores were used to adjust the background factors between the two groups. Results: From 25 facilities, 139 patients were included in this study. Group A and B contained 50 (G/C, 43/7 patients) and 89 (G/C, 58/31 patients) patients, respectively. Patient characteristics were as follows (Group A/Group B): median age (range), 70 (28–83)/68 (39–86); ECOG PS 1–2, 66/69%, more than two prior regimens, 46/0%; response to previous platinum-based CTx, 46/38%. The regimen in combination with RAM in Group A was paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel/FOLFIRI (62/26/12%). Second-line CTx in Group B were commonly amrubicin (58%) and irinotecan (11%). The efficacy (Group A/Group B) after a median follow-up time of 7.5/5.5 months were as follows: median overall survival (mOS), 8.6/5.8 months (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45–1.01; p = 0.058); median progression-free survival, 4.3/1.9 months (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39–0.84; p = 0.004); objective response rate, 50/8% ( p &lt; 0.0001); disease control rate, 70/24% ( p &lt; 0.0001); mOS in G-NEC, 8.6/5.3 months (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39–0.99; p = 0.047); and mOS in C-NEC, 5.4/6.8 months (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.26–1.66; p = 0.378). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event that occurred in more than 5% of patients in Group A was neutropenia (32%). Conclusions: This study suggests that RAM-containing CTx as second- or later-line treatment is effective for GI-NEC patients, especially for G-NEC. Central pathological review and biomarker analyses using pretreated tissue specimens are ongoing. We will present updated data in the congress. Clinical trial information: UMIN000043200.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined with Anlotinib on Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined with Anlotinib on Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Successful Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Case Report.

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may potentially aid downstaging, increase the possibility of radical surgery. We herein report a case of a 63-year-old man who had been diagnosed with locally advanced small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas according to the diagnostic biopsy. The patient received 6 courses of etoposide and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in an attempt to stop tumor progression, which promoted obvious tumor shrinkage without adverse effects and allowed subsequent Appleby procedure, the distal pancreatectomy with celiac artery resection. The patient showed no recurrence in the follow-up of a contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan, which is 8 months after surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is a rare case to report etoposide and cisplatin administration before surgery for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma promoted a pathological partial response and finally achieved a radical surgery, providing a novel therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Radical Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Neuroendocrine Cancer of the Cervix.

Although still controversial, the current treatment for locally advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC) relies on chemoradiation (CRT). The aim of this study is to evaluate the alternative role of combined chemotherapy and surgery in treating NECC. This is a retrospective series of patients undergoing radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for locally advanced NECC (stages IIB-IVA). Histological examination and immunohistochemistry were performed on surgical specimens to confirm diagnosis. Systematic literature search was conducted to identify other cases treated with chemotherapy and surgery. Seven patients with a mean age of 49 years were identified. The mean greatest diameter at diagnosis was 59.3±24.7 mm. FIGO stage was IIB in 14.3% of patients, IIIB in 28.6%, IIIC in 42.9%, and IVA in 14.3%. The response to NACT was partial, ranging from 50% to 80%. Neuroendocrine markers were expressed in all cases. The mean progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 15.0±30.6 months and 26.3±36.4 months, respectively. Eleven studies encompassing a total of 27 patients met eligibility criteria for the systematic review. Surgery after NACT for locally advanced NECC may yield similar outcomes compared to CRT. The benefit of performing surgery as a primary approach could lie in the possibility of reserving CRT for recurrences. Since randomized clinical trials are difficult to be designed, an expert consensus is required to address the non-inferiority of radical surgery over CRT.

Abstract 984: Targeting BCL-xL addiction with APG-1252 (pelcitoclax) to overcome apoptotic blockade in neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN)

Abstract Current targeted therapies such as VEGFR inhibitor sunitinib and mTOR inhibitor everolimus extend progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with Grade 1 (G1) and G2 neuroendocrine tumors (NET), but the objective response rate remains low. The median PFS in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) receiving platinum-based therapy is only 3 to 4 months. Hence, more effective therapy is needed to improve clinical outcomes. This study explored if BCL-2 family antideath proteins play a role in NEN tumorigenesis and whether clinical-stage dual BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitor APG-1252 might overcome intrinsic apoptotic blockade in NEN. A panel of six NEN cell lines were exposed to APG-1252-M1, which is an active metabolite of APG-1252 typically used for in vitro studies. After 72 hours, the IC50 of APG-1252-M1 ranged from 0.43 to 10 μM. Among the panel, pancreatic NET (pNET) cell lines BON-1 and β-TC3 exhibited the highest sensitivity, with IC50 values of 0.43 and 0.55 µM, respectively, whereas NEC cell line NCI-H460 was insensitive to APG-1252-M1. Interestingly, Western blot analysis revealed higher expression of BCL-xL compared to BCL-2 and MCL-1 proteins in NET cell lines (BON-1, QGP-1, NCI-H727). Higher baseline levels of BCL-xL:BIM and BCL-xL:PUMA complexes in NEN cells indicated APG-1252-M1 sensitivity. Exposure to APG-1252-M1 disrupted these complexes, liberating BIM/PUMA to trigger the apoptotic cascade, as indicated by an increase in BAX:BAK complexes. Conversely, lower BCL-xL complex levels and higher MCL-1 levels correlated with insensitivity of NCI-H460 to APG-1252-M1. Immunohistochemistry staining of BCL-xL, BCL-2, and MCL-1 proteins was performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 106 NEN patient tumors (including stomach/intestine/pancreatic NEN), of which approximately 70% were NET and 30% NEC. Similar to data in NEN cell lines, BCL-xL expression was higher than BCL-2 expression in NEN patient samples, in which BCL-xL expression was indicated by more than 80% of samples with IHC scoring ≥6 on a scale of 0 to 10, and BCL-2 expression by 30% IHC scoring &amp;lt; 6 or undetectable (60% IHC scoring 0). Unexpectedly, however, MCL-1 expression was also high, with more than 80% of samples IHC scoring ≥6. In summary, the results suggest that BCL-xL plays an important role in NEN. Cellular sensitivity to BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitor APG-1252-M1 correlates with baseline BCL-xL complex levels. In NEN patient samples, MCL-1 was also highly expressed, implicating its potential negative regulatory effect on sensitivity to APG-1252. Concurrent expression of BCL-xL and MCL-1 proteins suggests that a combination treatment targeting both proteins might be more effective in NEN. Our findings inform development of a BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibitor for NEN therapy. Citation Format: Yu Guo, Jing Deng, Lin Zhang, Xiaojing Huang, Kaixiang Zhang, Feng Zhou, Yuanbao Li, Fan Luo, Douglas D. Fang, Dajun Yang, Jie Chen, Yifan Zhai. Targeting BCL-xL addiction with APG-1252 (pelcitoclax) to overcome apoptotic blockade in neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 984.

Surufatinib in combination with toripalimab in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma: Results from a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

e16199 Background: Patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment option after first-line treatment. Surufatinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor of VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1 and CSF-1R, has been approved in patients with advanced or metastatic extra-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in China. Toripalimab is a monoclonal humanized IgG4 PD-1 antibody. Surufatinib modulates tumor immune microenvironment and has shown promising antitumor activity in combination with toripalimab in solid tumors, including neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma. Herein, we reported the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in combination with toripalimab in a cohort of advanced NEC patients. Methods: The multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II clinical trial enrolled advanced NEC patients refractory to first-line chemotherapy, and received surufatinib 250 mg once a day orally plus toripalimab 240 mg intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point is objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Results: Twenty-one patients enrolled and received combination therapy. At data cut-off (December 31, 2020), the average treatment cycles were 5.1±3.69 for surufatinib and 5.0±3.68 for toripalimab. Among 20 tumor evaluable patients, 4 patients achieved confirmed PR and 10 patients achieved stable disease. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) are 20 % (95%CI: 5.7%-43.7%) and 70% (95%CI: 45.7%-88.1%) respectively. The median PFS is 3.94 months (95%CI: 1.31- unknown). OS is not mature till data cut-off. Adverse events (AEs) reported as related to treatment (TRAE) occurred in 100% of patients, of which Grade≥3 TRAEs occurred in 33.3% of patients. The reported Grade≥3 TRAEs were hypertension in 2 (9.5%) patients, and upper abdominal pain, oral mucositis, neutrophil count decreased, leukocyte count decreased, dermatitis, anemia and backache in 1 (4.8%) patient each. Immune related Grade ≥3 AEs, Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase increased and dermatitis, occurred in 2 (9.5%) patients, respectively. TRAE caused surufatinib or toripalimab interruption occurred in 6 (28.6%) and 4 (19%) patients respectively. There were neither serious AEs nor AEs inducing treatment discontinuations or deaths. Conclusions: As there is no standard second-line treatment, this combination of surufatinib and toripalimab might offer a new promising choice to treat NEC as second-line treatment due to good efficacy and manageable treatment related toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT04169672.