Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Research Articles

Early Experience with EndoRobotic Submucosal Dissection (ERSD): Pathologic and Short-term Outcomes in the First 28 Patients.

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-port endorobotic submucosal dissection (ERSD) using the Da Vinci SP platform for the management of rectal neoplasms. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers a potential organ-sparing treatment for advanced colorectal neoplasms but demands high technical skill and a steep learning curve. Advances in semiflexible robotic platforms, such as the Da Vinci SP, promise to simplify this procedure, potentially offering improved outcomes for patients with benign rectal neoplasms. A retrospective analysis of 28 patients who underwent ERSD using the Da Vinci SP platform between 2020 and 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details, outcomes, and complications were reviewed. The primary endpoint was successful en-bloc resection. The cohort had a median age of 60.5 years and a median BMI of 28.2kg/m², predominantly male(67.8%) with ASA categories 2 or 3(82%). Lesions had a median size of 38mm and were located a median of 9cm from the anal verge. The median procedure time was 87.5 minutes. En-bloc resection was achieved in all cases(100%), with no intraoperative complications or mortality. One patient experienced urinary retention, and one had late bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Pathology outcomes included 46.4% tubulovillous adenomas, 21.4% adenocarcinomas, and high-grade dysplasia in 53.6% of patients. Single-port ERSD using the Da Vinci SP platform is safe and feasible for the management of colorectal neoplasia, ensuring a high rate of en-bloc resection. It potentially offers advantages over conventional ESD, including shorter dissection times, although further studies are necessary for a definitive comparison.

Excess weight, polygenic risk score and findings of colorectal neoplasms at screening colonoscopy.

Excess weight is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, evidence is lacking on how its impact varies by polygenic risk at different stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. We assessed the individual and joint associations of body mass index (BMI) and polygenic risk scores (PRSs) with findings of colorectal neoplasms among 4,784 participants of screening colonoscopy. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for excess weight derived by multiple logistic regression were converted to genetic risk equivalents (GREs) to quantify the impact of excess weight compared to genetic predisposition. Overweight and obesity (BMI 25-<30 and ≥30 kg/m2) were associated with increased risk of any colorectal neoplasm (aOR [95% CI] 1.26 [1.09-1.45] and 1.47 [1.24-1.75]). Obesity was associated with increased risk of advanced colorectal neoplasm (aOR [95% CI] 1.46 [1.16-1.84]). Dose-response relationships were seen for the PRS (stronger for advanced neoplasms than any neoplasms), with no interaction with BMI, suggesting multiplicative effects of both factors. Obese participants with a PRS in the highest tertile had a 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.7-3.1) and 2.9-fold (95%CI 1.9-4.3) increased risk of any colorectal neoplasm and advanced colorectal neoplasm, respectively. The aOR of obesity translated into a GRE of 38, meaning that its impact was estimated to be equivalent to the risk caused by 38 percentiles higher PRS for colorectal neoplasm. Excess weight and polygenic risk are associated with increased risk of colorectal neoplasms in a multiplicative manner. Maintaining normal weight is estimated to have an equivalent effect as having 38 percentiles lower PRS.

Risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia among diabetic patients: A derivation and validation study.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world. This study devises and validates a clinical scoring system for risk prediction of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) to guide colonoscopy evaluation among diabetic patients. We identified 55 964 diabetic patients who received colonoscopies from a large database in a Chinese population (2008-2018). We recruited a derivation cohort based on random sampling. The risk factors of CRC evaluated by univariate analysis were examined for ACN, defined as advanced adenoma, CRC, or any combination thereof using binary logistic regression analysis. We used the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for independent risk factors to devise a risk score, ranging from 0 to 6: 0-4 "average risk" (AR) and 5-6 "high risk" (HR). The other subjects acted as an independent validation cohort. The prevalence of ACN in both the derivation and validation cohorts was 2.0%. Using the scoring system constructed, 78.5% and 21.5% of patients in the validation cohort were classified as AR and HR, respectively. The prevalence of ACN in the AR and HR groups was 1.5% and 4.1%, respectively. Individuals in the HR group had a 2.78-fold increased prevalence of ACN than the AR group. The concordance (c-) statistics was 0.70, implying a good discriminatory capability of the risk score to stratify high-risk individuals who should consider colonoscopy. The clinical risk scoring system based on age, gender, smoking, presence of hypertension, and use of aspirin is useful for ACN risk prediction among diabetic patients.

Effectiveness of fecal DNA syndecan-2 methylation testing for detection of colorectal cancer in a high-risk Chinese population.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent and life-threatening malignancies worldwide. Syndecan-2 methylation (mSDC2) testing has emerged as a widely used biomarker for early detection of CRC in stool and serum samples. Cancer (CRC) is among the most prevalent and life-threatening malignancies worldwide. mSDC2 testing has emerged as a widely used biomarker for early detection of CRC in stool and serum samples. To validate the effectiveness of fecal DNA mSDC2 testing in the detection of CRC among a high-risk Chinese population to provide evidence-based data for the development of diagnostic and/or screening guidelines for CRC in China. A high-risk Chinese cohort consisting of 1130 individuals aged 40-79 years was selected for evaluation via fecal mSDC2 testing. Sensitivity and specificity for CRC, advanced adenoma (AA) and advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) were determined. High-risk factors for the incidence of colorectal lesions were determined and a logistic regression model was constructed to reflect the efficacy of the test. A total of 1035 high-risk individuals were included in this study according to established criteria. Among them, 16 suffered from CRC (1.55%), 65 from AA (6.28%) and 189 from non-AAs (18.26%); 150 patients were diagnosed with polyps (14.49%). Diagnoses were established based upon colonoscopic and pathological examinations. Sensitivities of the mSDC2 test for CRC and AA were 87.50% and 40.00%, respectively; specificities were 95.61% for other groups. Positive predictive values of the mSDC2 test for CRC, AA and ACN were 16.09%, 29.89% and 45.98%, respectively; the negative predictive value for CRC was 99.79%. After adjusting for other high-risk covariates, mSDC2 test positivity was found to be a significant risk factor for the occurrence of ACN (P < 0.001). Our findings confirmed that offering fecal mSDC2 testing and colonoscopy in combination for CRC screening is effective for earlier detection of malignant colorectal lesions in a high-risk Chinese population.

Trends in colorectal cancer screening compliance and incidence among 60- to 74-year-olds in China.

Compliance with colonoscopy among elderly individuals participating in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs is unsatisfactory, despite a high detection rate of bowel-related diseases. In this study, our aim was to analyze the impact of risk factors on the trends of compliance and detection rates in colonoscopy among high-risk individuals aged 60-74. A retrospective study was conducted on the high-risk individuals aged 60-74 participating in the 2021 CRC screening program in Tianjin, China. Logistic regression analyses, including both univariate and multivariate analyses, were performed to explore the impact of different risk factors on colonoscopy compliance among the high-risk individuals. Besides, the study investigated the influence of various risk factors on the detection rates of bowel-related diseases among the high-risk individuals who underwent colonoscopy. A total of 24,064 high-risk individuals were included, and 5478 individuals received a free colonoscopy, with an overall compliance of 22.76%. Among them, the adenoma detection rate was 55.46%. Males and individuals with a positive FIT had high compliance and detection rates for CRC, advanced adenomas (AA), advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN), and colorectal neoplasm (CN). Individuals aged 70-74 were associated with low compliance but high CRC, ACN, and CN detection rates. Individuals who reported a history of chronic constipation, bloody mucous, and CRC in first-degree relative showed high compliance but no significantwere associated with the detection rates of CRC, AA, and CN. This study reported several risk factors associated with the screening behaviors for CRC. Patterns and trends in CRC, AA, ACN, and CN compliance and detection rates correlate with risk factors.

Follow-up Colonoscopy for Detection of Missed Colorectal Cancer after Diverticulitis

Background and aimsColonoscopy is often recommended following an episode of diverticulitis to exclude missed colorectal cancer (CRC). This is a controversial recommendation based on limited evidence. We estimated the prevalence and odds of CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia on colonoscopy in patients with diverticulitis compared to CRC screening. MethodsUsing data from the Gastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium registry, we performed a cross-sectional study with patients ≥40 years old undergoing outpatient colonoscopy for an indication of diverticulitis follow-up or CRC screening. The primary outcome was CRC. The secondary outcome was advanced colorectal neoplasia. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. ResultsWe identified 4,591,921 outpatient colonoscopies performed for screening and 91,993 colonoscopies for diverticulitis follow-up. CRC prevalence was 0.33% in colonoscopies for screening and 0.31% in colonoscopies for diverticulitis. Compared to screening, patients with diverticulitis were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.94). CRC prevalence decreased to 0.17% in colonoscopies performed for diverticulitis only. Compared to screening, patients with diverticulitis as the only indication were less likely to have CRC (adjusted OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.68). CRC prevalence increased to 1.43% in patients with complicated diverticulitis. Compared to screening, patients with complicated diverticulitis were more likely to have CRC (adjusted OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.59-8.01). ConclusionThe risk of CRC cancer is low in most patients with diverticulitis. Patients with complicated diverticulitis are the exception. Our results suggest that colonoscopy to detect missed CRC should include diverticulitis patients with a complication and those not current with CRC screening.

Real-world Stool-based mSDC2 Test Improved Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Prospective, Multicenter, Community-based Study.

Real-world Stool-based mSDC2 Test Improved Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Prospective, Multicenter, Community-based Study.

Abstract 7294: CREATE-2: Colorectal cancer &amp; adenoma test evaluation of a multi-omic blood test

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, with almost 2 million new cases reported in 2020. CRC develops over time from a pre-cancerous stage (adenoma) - the ‘adenoma-carcinoma sequence’. Pre-cancerous lesions, such as Higher Risk Adenomas (HRA), harbour an increased risk of developing into CRC and their features are defined according to size, number and histological features. Screening for signs of CRC is recommended for average-risk adults using faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in the UK, to enable the removal of pre-cancerous lesions and treatment of early-stage cancers. However, the performance of FIT is limited. Approximately 10% of CRC diagnoses have a negative FIT result, and it currently has ~93% false positive rate. Moreover, the sensitivity for detecting AA is only 24%, highlighting the need for alternative strategies. Methods: A promising strategy for earlier CRC detection is the clinical use of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The Dxcover® Colorectal Cancer Liquid Biopsy is a rapid multi-omic test that interrogates a blood sample with infrared (IR) radiation and produces a distinctive signature that represents the whole biomolecular profile of the sample. Rather than focusing on individual biomarkers, the technique encompasses the full range of diagnostic information from both the tumor and the non-tumor response. In the initial CREATE (ColoREctal Cancer &amp; Adenoma Test Evaluation) feasibility study, the potential of the technology was highlighted in a retrospective cohort of patients comprising 100 CRC, 92 adenoma samples and 104 colonoscopy screening controls diagnosed as non-cancer. At 90% specificity, the test reported 80% CRC sensitivity and 59% HRA sensitivity. CREATE-2 is a prospective, observational, multicenter study, currently recruiting patients across the United States. The primary objective of the study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the blood-based Dxcover Colorectal Cancer Liquid Biopsy for CRC and HRA, and collectively as advanced colorectal neoplasia. Primary outcomes are sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the test as compared to the standard of care screening modality. The study population is comprised of patients aged 45-84 considered ‘average-risk’ for CRC, undergoing routine CRC screening as standard of care. Patients are treatment naïve for CRC/HRA and must be willing to consent to blood draw pre-bowel preparation, and follow-up for 24 months. A rapid blood test that is sensitive to pre-cancerous lesions and early-stage CRC could substantially improve patient outcomes. Current screening programs have addressable shortcomings, and the emergence of new technologies is essential to support earlier CRC detection. Citation Format: James M. Cameron, Georgios Antoniou, Rose McHardy, David Palmer, Alexandra Sala, Matthew Baker. CREATE-2: Colorectal cancer &amp; adenoma test evaluation of a multi-omic blood test [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7294.

A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening

BackgroundColorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer in adults in the United States. Early detection could prevent more than 90% of colorectal cancer–related deaths, yet more than one third of the screening-eligible population is not up to date with screening despite multiple available tests. A blood-based test has the potential to improve screening adherence, detect colorectal cancer earlier, and reduce colorectal cancer–related mortality.MethodsWe assessed the performance characteristics of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood-based test in a population eligible for colorectal cancer screening. The coprimary outcomes were sensitivity for colorectal cancer and specificity for advanced neoplasia (colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions) relative to screening colonoscopy. The secondary outcome was sensitivity to detect advanced precancerous lesions.ResultsThe clinical validation cohort included 10,258 persons, 7861 of whom met eligibility criteria and were evaluable. A total of 83.1% of the participants with colorectal cancer detected by colonoscopy had a positive cfDNA test and 16.9% had a negative test, which indicates a sensitivity of the cfDNA test for detection of colorectal cancer of 83.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.2 to 90.3). Sensitivity for stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer was 87.5% (95% CI, 75.3 to 94.1), and sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions was 13.2% (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.3). A total of 89.6% of the participants without any advanced colorectal neoplasia (colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions) identified on colonoscopy had a negative cfDNA blood-based test, whereas 10.4% had a positive cfDNA blood-based test, which indicates a specificity for any advanced neoplasia of 89.6% (95% CI, 88.8 to 90.3). Specificity for negative colonoscopy (no colorectal cancer, advanced precancerous lesions, or nonadvanced precancerous lesions) was 89.9% (95% CI, 89.0 to 90.7).ConclusionsIn an average-risk screening population, this cfDNA blood-based test had 83% sensitivity for colorectal cancer, 90% specificity for advanced neoplasia, and 13% sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions. (Funded by Guardant Health; ECLIPSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04136002.)

Performance of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score in stratifying the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the performance of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score and its incorporation with the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in stratifying the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN). We systematically searched for relevant articles in 12 electronic databases and registers on October 20, 2021, and updated the search to September 1, 2023. Random-effect models were used to obtain the pooled performance statistics of the APCS score for ACN risk. From the 101 records screened, 13 eligible studies in the Asia-Pacific region involving 69762 subjects who had undergone colonoscopy were enrolled. The pooled prevalences of ACN in the average-risk (AR) tier (APCS 0-1), moderate-risk (MR) tier (APCS 2-3), and high-risk (HR) tier (APCS≥4) groups were 0.9%, 3.1%, and 8.1%, respectively. Compared with the combined AR-MR group, the HR group was significantly associated with a higher ACN risk (pooled diagnostic odds ratio: 2.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-3.45, P<0.001). The APCS score showed a sensitivity of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.40-0.44) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85-0.86) for predicting the ACN risk, with a weighted area under the curve of 0.642 (95% CI: 0.610-0.657). The combination of the APCS score and FIT substantially improved ACN risk identification, demonstrating pooled diagnostic odds ratios of 4.02 (95% CI: 2.50-6.49) in the AR-MR groups and 5.44 (95% CI: 1.89-15.63) in the MR-HR groups. The APCS score could effectively stratify the ACN risk in the Asia-Pacific population. Incorporating FIT further improves its performance in identifying high-risk subjects who should be prioritized for colonoscopy screenings.

The Association of Metabolic Risk Factors with Advanced Adenomas in Hispanic Patients.

Obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have been implicated as rising risk factors for the development of colorectal cancers. A rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among Hispanic patients in the United States may present substantially increased risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia in this population. Currently, there is very little research in this area. We sought to identify metabolic risk factors for advanced adenomas (AA) in Hispanic Americans. We retrospectively reviewed data from the Los Angeles General (LAG) Medical Center of asymptomatic Hispanic patients above 45 years of age who underwent their first colonoscopies following a positive screening FBT. Patient demographics, metabolic characteristics, as well as colon polyp size and histology were recorded. Polyps were classified as adenomas or AA (including both high-risk adenomas and high-risk serrated polyps). Relative risk for AA was assessed by multivariate logistical regression analyses. Of the 672 patients in our study, 41.4% were male, 67% had adenomas, and 16% had AA. The mean BMI was 31.2kg/m2. The mean HDL-C was 49.5mg/dL (1.28 mmol/L) and the mean triglyceride level was 151mg/dL. 44.6% had diabetes and 64.1% had hypertension. When comparing patients with AA to patients with no adenoma, male sex, BMI > 34.9kg/m2, and elevated fasting triglyceride levels were associated with an increased risk of AA. FIB-4 ≥1.45 was also associated with an increased risk of AA in males. There was no significant difference in the risk of AA with diabetes, hypertension, FIB-4 score, LDL-C level, and HDL-C level. Hispanic patients with a positive FBT were observed to have a high incidence of AA. Class II obesity (BMI ≥ 35kg/m2), elevated triglyceride levels were identified as risk factors among males in our study. Early interventions to address these modifiable risk factors in at-risk populations, such as multi-disciplinary weight management programs for the treatment of obesity and related co-morbidities, could potentially lead to risk reduction and CRC prevention.

A270 RISK FACTORS FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA DEVELOPMENT IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC-IBD) have a 25-year cumulative risk of up to 50% to develop colorectal neoplasia (CRN). Mucosal inflammation is an important driver of CRN development in IBD, but it is unknown whether this also applies to PSC-IBD patients. Aims We aimed to assess the impact of active mucosal inflammation per colonic segment and endoscopic remission on CRN risk. Methods This is a single-center case-control study, including cases with PSC-IBD with CRN, and controls with PSC-IBD without CRN. Exclusion criteria were a CRN diagnosis prior to IBD or PSC diagnosis, familial CRC syndromes, and insufficient endoscopic follow-up (ampersand:003C2 available colonoscopy reports, and for cases, ampersand:003C2 available endoscopy reports before CRN diagnosis). Data was collected on demographics, IBD and PSC disease characteristics, and IBD medication use. Data from all available colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy reports between 2002 and 2023, including endoscopic and histologic disease severity, disease extent, and CRN lesions, was collected. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of CRN, secondary outcomes included CRN grade and location, inflammatory burden per colonic segment harboring CRN, and colonic surgery. Results We included 247 PSC-IBD patients (163 ulcerative colitis, 80 Crohn’s disease) with a median follow-up of 6.3 years (IQR: 4.1-12.6) and 6 endoscopic procedures (IQR: 4.0-8.0). Median disease duration was 19 years for IBD (IQR: 11.0-26.0) and 13 years for PSC (IQR: 7.0-18.0). In 50 cases a total of 113 CRN lesions were observed, of which 11 (10%) were advanced CRN (aCRN; HGD or CRC). 23 patients (45%) were diagnosed with ampersand:003E 1 lesion while 45 lesions (40%) were identified in the right-sided colon, 27 (24%) in the transverse colon, 28 (25%) in the left-sided colon, and 10 (9%) in the rectum (3 lesions unknown). Endoscopic remission was observed in 24 cases (48%) during the 2 endoscopies prior to lesion detection vs. in 83 controls (42%) for their last 2 endoscopies. Of all CRN lesions, 39 (35%) were found in a colonic segment with confirmed previous endoscopic and/or histologic inflammation during the 1-2 endoscopies prior to lesion detection (31 low-grade and 8 aCRN). Of the 32 patients who underwent (sub)total colectomy or proctocolectomy, 20 (63%) had an indication due to CRN diagnosis. Mortality was 13% (n=32) during follow-up. Conclusions The risk for CRN and associated colectomy is high in PSC-IBD. Active mucosal inflammation preceded CRN in the affected colonic segment in only 35% of the lesions. Future expansion and additional analysis of our cohort will focus on the impact of persistent endoscopic remission and impact of biologic therapy on CRN risk in PSC-IBD. Funding Agencies None

Fecal Immunochemical Testing and the Risk of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia: A Difference-In-Difference Analysis.

To evaluate the effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in colorectal cancer screening. We conducted a prospective cohort study among 5,598 participants age 40-74 years between 2012 and 2020 in Tianjin, China. Inverse probability weighting was adopted to adjust for potential imbalanced factors between groups. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the weighted associations between FIT screening and advanced colorectal neoplasia. A difference-in-difference (DID) model was adopted to compare the incidence rates of advanced colorectal neoplasia between groups. In DID analysis, the rate of incidence was reduced by 0.34 cases per person-years in the screening group as compared with the historical FIT screening group (rate ratio [RR], 0.08 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.10]) and by 0.06 cases per person-years in the non-FIT screening group as compared with the historical non-FIT screening group (RR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.48]; P < .001 for both comparisons), with a relative reduction of 0.28. Similar benefit effect from FIT screening was observed in sex and age subgroups. FIT screening was associated with a reduction in incidence density from advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Dynamic Prediction of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Colonoscopic surveillance is recommended in patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) given their increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to develop and validate a dynamic prediction model for the occurrence of advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN, including high-grade dysplasia and CRC) in IBD. We pooled data from six existing cohort studies from Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, and the USA. Patients with IBD and an indication for CRC surveillance were included if they underwent at least one follow-up procedure. Exclusion criteria included prior aCRN, prior colectomy, or an unclear indication for surveillance. Predictor variables were selected based on literature. A dynamic prediction model was developed using a landmarking approach based on Cox proportional hazard modelling. Model performance was assessed with Harrell's concordance-statistic (discrimination) and by calibration curves. Generalizability across surveillance cohorts was evaluated by internal-external cross-validation. The surveillance cohorts comprised 3,731 patients, enrolled and followed-up in the time period 1973-2021, with a median follow-up of 5.7 years (26,336 patient-years of follow-up); 146 individuals were diagnosed with aCRN. The model contained eight predictors, with a cross-validation median c-statistic of 0.74 and 0.75 for a 5- and 10-year prediction window, respectively. Calibration plots showed good calibration. Internal-external cross-validation results showed medium discrimination and reasonable to good calibration. The new prediction model showed good discrimination and calibration, however, generalizability results varied. Future research should focus on formal external validation and relate predicted aCRN risks to surveillance intervals prior to clinical application.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) positivity and its association with clinicopathological characteristics by novel blood-based test for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening from a multi-center large cohort: COSMOS-CRC-01.

69 Background: Blood-based CRC screening has yielded performance comparable to stool-based screening tests and may be a modality that addresses the adherence gap in CRC screening. To investigate the diagnostic performance and its clinical relevance, we evaluated the test performance of a blood-based CRC screening test in a large cohort of individuals enriched for advanced colorectal neoplasia and early CRCs. Methods: 501 individuals presenting to ten institutions in Japan from 2020 to 2021 for treatment of advanced adenomas (AAs) or CRCs were consented and provided a pre-treatment blood sample (40mL whole blood in Streck cfDNA blood collection tubes). All eligible individuals underwent surgery or endoscopic resection within 30 days after sample collection and the pathological specimens were reviewed to determine cancer histology and stage, as well as AA histology. Pre-treatment blood samples were analyzed with a multi-modal (genomic and epigenomic) cfDNA CRC detection assay (Shield, Guardant Health, USA). Final cfDNA results were correlated with clinical data to determine the association of clinicopathological characteristics with test sensitivity. This study is registered as a clinical trial under UMIN000037765. Results: 451/501 (90%) individuals met inclusion/exclusion criteria and provided adequate blood samples that passed testing quality control criteria. Median age at consent was 67.4 years (range 31 – 92). 44% were female. 214/451 (47%) had a prior positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Of individuals with a negative or unknown FOBT testing, 161/237 (68%) had GI symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, bloody/narrowing stool, constipation/diarrhea). The test identified 88% (268/305) of CRCs, including 71% (79/111) Stage I, 98% (87/89) Stage II, 97% (90/93) Stage III, and 100% (12/12) Stage IV. Overall sensitivity in detecting Stage I-III was 87%. The test identified 37% (54/146) of AAs, including 49% (33/68) of carcinoma in situs and 24% (9/37) of AAs with high-grade dysplasia. Sensitivity for right-sided CRC was 84% (61/73), 87% (59/68) for left-sided CRC, and 90% (148/164) for rectal tumors. Stage I test sensitivity was significantly associated with tumor size (&gt;20mm; p&lt;0.01), left-sided or rectal tumor location (p&lt;0.05), and tumor depth (p&lt;0.01) in univariate analysis, whereas the tumor depth (T2) was the sole factor associated with test positivity (p&lt;0.05) in multivariate analysis. Specificity on this assay is 90% as determined in the ECLIPSE clinical study (NCT04136002). Conclusions: This study evaluates the performance of a blood-based test for CRC and its clinicopathological relevance in a large-scale cohort. In this population enriched for early colorectal neoplasia, the sensitivity was 88% for CRC and 37% for AAs. This performance is consistent with previous reports. Clinical trial information: UMIN000037765 .

Risk Factors Associated with Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Adults Younger than Age 45.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is rising in young adults between ages 20 to 49 years. CRC screening is endorsed for average-risk individuals beginning at ages 45 to 49 years. Targeting screening for individuals <45 years may be warranted if risk factors for advanced neoplasia can be identified. To identify factors associated with advanced colorectal neoplasia in adults aged <45 years. Individuals ages 18 to 44 years who underwent colonoscopy at Cleveland Clinic between 2011 and 2021 with ≥1 advanced neoplasm (AN) were included. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or inherited CRC syndromes were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, family history of CRC, and colonoscopy indication were obtained. Patients with a normal colonoscopy constituted the control group. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to investigate the relationship between clinical variables and the presence of advanced colorectal neoplasia. In all, 13,006 patients were included, of which 651 (5%) patients had AN: 404 (62%) with tubular adenoma ≥10mm, 29 (4.5%) tubular adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, 210 (32%) tubulovillous adenomas, 27 (4%) traditional serrated adenomas, 82 (13%) sessile serrated lesions ≥10mm, 7(2%) sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia, and 29 (4.4%) patients had a CRC. Factors associated with AN were older age (means 38.5 vs. 36.6y), history of smoking, diabetes, non-White race, higher body mass index (29.9 vs. 28.5kg/m2), and lower vitamin D (27.6 vs. 32.2 ng/dl), all P<0.001. In the reduced multivariable model, factors associated with AN included tobacco use (OR 2.026 (current vs. never, P<0.0001), age (OR increase by 1.06 per year, P<0.0001), male gender (OR 1.476, P<0.0001), family history of CRC (OR 3.91, P<0.0001), aspirin use (1.31, P=0.035), and diabetes (OR 2.106, P 0.001). Increasing age, male gender, exposure to tobacco, family history of CRC, diabetes, and aspirin use were independently associated with advanced neoplasia in adults younger than 45. Targeted early screening to young adults with these risk factors may be justified. Large collaborative prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Prevalence and risk factors of colorectal neoplasia in individuals aged 40-49years: Findings from screening program in China.

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in individuals under 50 is increasing worldwide. We conducted an analysis of colonoscopy findings in high-risk individuals under 50 in the CRC screening program in Tianjin, China, to determine the detection rate and risk factors of advanced adenomas (AA), advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN), colorectal neoplasia (CN). Our study investigated individuals aged 40-49 who underwent CRC screening and completed colonoscopy, 2012-2020, while the 50-54 age group served as a control. We compared the detection rates of AA, ACN, and CN among three age groups using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and investigated the risk factors associated with AA, ACN, and CN among individuals aged 40-49. We found a gradual increase in the detection rate of AA, ACN, and CN among individuals aged 40-54. The detection rates for AA (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.81), ACN (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.77), and CN (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.56-0.74) were lower in individuals aged 40-44 compared to 45-49. The detection rates of AA (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.87-1.34) and ACN (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.93-1.35) in individuals aged 45-49 were comparable with 50-54. Besides, lifestyle factors, BMI, and FIT are not associated with the detection rates of AA, ACN, and CN among individuals aged 40-49. Our study reveals screening data in individuals under 50, indicating comparable detection rates of AA and ACN in individuals aged 45-49 and 50-54. These findings provide valuable data support for optimizing the optimal age to initiate screening.

Factors influencing advanced colorectal neoplasm anatomic site distribution in China: An epidemiological study based on colorectal cancer screening data.

Existing studies indicate that advanced colorectal neoplasms exhibit distinct clinical and biological traits based on anatomical sites. However, in China, especially for advanced colorectal neoplasms, there's limited information available on these traits. Our primary objective is to comprehensively study the characteristics of advanced colorectal neoplasm patients in different anatomical sites in China. We selected information from the colorectal cancer screening database in Tianjin, China, since 2010 as the study subject. We chose valid information from 3113 patients with comprehensive data and diagnosed advanced colorectal neoplasms (ANs) from a pool of 19,308 individuals to be included in the study. We then conducted further analysis to examine the correlation between these epidemiological data and tumor location. Among the 3113 patients, neoplasms in the left side of the colon accounted for the largest proportion, while neoplasms in the right side of the colon had the smallest proportion, followed by rectal neoplasms. The highest proportion of advanced colorectal neoplasms was found among men. In the age group of 39-49 years old, the proportion of left late-stage advanced colon neoplasms was equal to that of right late-stage advanced colon neoplasms, while late-stage advanced rectal neoplasms increased with age. Smoking, drinking, and a history of colon cancer in first-degree relatives showed statistically significant associations with the location distribution of advanced colorectal neoplasms. A history of appendicitis, appendectomy, cholecystitis, or cholecystectomy did not significantly affect the location distribution of advanced colorectal neoplasms. However, among patients with such histories, there was a statistically significant relationship between advanced colon neoplasms on the right and those on the left and in the rectum. Similar results were observed for BMI. Our research findings demonstrate that advanced colorectal neoplasms display unique epidemiological characteristics depending on their anatomical locations, and these distinctions deviate from those observed in Western populations. These insights contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and offer valuable guidance for future research in China. We advocate for further investigations centered on the anatomical location of colorectal neoplasms to enhance the precision of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and treatment.

Establishment and validation of symptomatic patients colorectal screening score for predicting colorectal neoplasia risk.

Currently, most colorectal neoplasia (CRN) screening strategies target asymptomatic individuals. However, studies on patients with non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms (NSGS) are limited. We aimed to develop a CRN risk score specifically for patients with NSGS. We prospectively enrolled patients who underwent initial colonoscopy between June 2020 and June 2021. A new risk scoring system was constructed and its applicability was evaluated. A total of 1522 consecutive patients were enrolled, among whom 1016 symptomatic patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7:3. The constructed Symptomatic Patients Colorectal Screening (SPCS) score showed higher diagnostic efficacy and sensitivity than several previous scoring systems. Using the SPCS score, the patients were divided into a low-risk group (-2 to 3 points) and a high-risk group (4-10 points) for CRN. Additionally, the detection rate of CRN in the training and validation cohorts of the high-risk group were 41.7% and 37.0%, respectively. The SPCS score detected 79.3% (188/237) of CRN and 87.5% (42/48) of advanced CRN in the high-risk group, which reduced the workload of colonoscopy to 45.9% (466/1016). An effective CRN risk scoring system was established and validated for symptomatic patients, which accurately classified individuals into low-risk and high-risk groups for CRN and might be used to optimize colonoscopic resource allocation.

Screening uptake of colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in first-degree relatives of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial (ParCoFit study).

Colonoscopy screening is underused by first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with non-syndromic colorectal cancer (CRC) with screening completion rates below 50%. Studies conducted in FDR referred for screening suggest that fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) was not inferior to colonoscopy in terms of diagnostic yield and tumor staging, but screening uptake of FIT has not yet been tested in this population. In this study, we investigated whether the uptake of FIT screening is superior to the uptake of colonoscopy screening in the familial-risk population, with an equivalent effect on CRC detection. This open-label, parallel-group, randomized trial was conducted in 12 Spanish centers between February 2016 and December 2021. Eligible individuals included asymptomatic FDR of index cases <60 years, siblings or ≥2 FDR with CRC. The primary outcome was to compare screening uptake between colonoscopy and FIT. The secondary outcome was to determine the efficacy of each strategy to detect advanced colorectal neoplasia (adenoma or serrated polyps ≥10 mm, polyps with tubulovillous architecture, high-grade dysplasia, and/or CRC). Screening-naïve FDR were randomized (1:1) to one-time colonoscopy versus annual FIT during 3 consecutive years followed by a work-up colonoscopy in the case of a positive test. Randomization was performed before signing the informed consent using computer-generated allocation algorithm based on stratified block randomization. Multivariable regression analysis was performed by intention-to-screen. On December 31, 2019, when 81% of the estimated sample size was reached, the trial was terminated prematurely after an interim analysis for futility. Study outcomes were further analyzed through 2-year follow-up. The main limitation of this study was the impossibility of collecting information on eligible individuals who declined to participate. A total of 1,790 FDR of 460 index cases were evaluated for inclusion, of whom 870 were assigned to undergo one-time colonoscopy (n = 431) or FIT (n = 439). Of them, 383 (44.0%) attended the appointment and signed the informed consent: 147/431 (34.1%) FDR received colonoscopy-based screening and 158/439 (35.9%) underwent FIT-based screening (odds ratio [OR] 1.08; 95% confidence intervals [CI] [0.82, 1.44], p = 0.564). The detection rate of advanced colorectal neoplasia was significantly higher in the colonoscopy group than in the FIT group (OR 3.64, 95% CI [1.55, 8.53], p = 0.003). Study outcomes did not change throughout follow-up. In this study, compared to colonoscopy, FIT screening did not improve screening uptake by individuals at high risk of CRC, resulting in less detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia. Further studies are needed to assess how screening uptake could be improved in this high-risk group, including by inclusion in population-based screening programs. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02567045).