Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Research Articles

Using Artificial Intelligence to Support Informed Decision-Making on BRAF Mutation Testing.

Precision oncology relies on accurate and interpretable reporting of testing and mutation rates. Focusing on the BRAFV600 mutations in advanced colorectal carcinoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and cutaneous melanoma, we developed a platform displaying testing and mutation rates reported in the literature, which we annotated using an artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) pipeline. Using AI, we identified publications that likely reported a testing or mutation rate, filtered publications for cancer type, and identified sentences that likely reported rates. Rates and covariates were subsequently manually curated by three experts. The AI performance was evaluated using precision and recall metrics. We used an interactive platform to explore and present the annotated testing and mutation rates by certain study characteristics. The interactive dashboard, accessible at the BRAF dimensions website, enables users to filter mutation and testing rates with relevant options (eg, country of study, study type, mutation type) and to visualize annotated rates. The AI pipeline demonstrated excellent filtering performance (>90% precision and recall for all target cancer types) and moderate performance for sentence classification (53%-99% precision; ≥75% recall). The manual annotation of testing and mutation rates revealed inter-rater disagreement (testing rate, 19%; mutation rate, 70%), indicating unclear or nonstandard reporting of rates in some publications. Our AI-driven NLP pipeline demonstrated the potential for annotating biomarker testing and mutation rates. The difficulties we encountered highlight the need for more advanced AI-powered literature searching and data extraction, and more consistent reporting of testing rates. These improvements would reduce the risk of misinterpretation or misunderstanding of testing and mutation rates by AI-based technologies and the health care community, with beneficial impacts on clinical decision-making, research, and trial design.

Integrative Transcriptomic and Single-Cell Protein Characterization of Colorectal Carcinoma Delineates Distinct Tumor Immune Microenvironments Associated with Overall Survival.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying therapeutic response and prognosis, and evidence suggests the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) plays a pivotal role. Using advanced molecular and spatial biology technologies, we aimed to evaluate the TIME in patients with CRC to determine whether specific alterations in the immune composition correlated with prognosis. We identified primary and metastatic tumor samples from 31 consented patients, which were profiled with whole-exome sequencing and bulk RNA-seq. Immune cell deconvolution followed by gene set enrichment analysis and unsupervised clustering was performed. A subset of tumors underwent in situ analysis of the TIME spatial composition at single-cell resolution through Imaging Mass Mass Cytometry. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed two distinct groups of advanced CRC, one with an immune activated phenotype and the other with a suppressed immune microenvironment. The activated TIME phenotype contained increased Th1 cells, activated dendritic cells, tertiary lymphoid structures, and higher counts of CD8+ T cells whereas the inactive or suppressed TIME contained increased macrophages and a higher M2/M1 ratio. Our findings were further supported by RNA-seq data analysis from the TCGA CRC database, in which unsupervised clustering also identified two separate groups. The immunosuppressed CRC TIME had a lower overall survival probability (HR 1.66, p=0.007). This study supports the pertinent role of the CRC immune microenvironment in tumor progression and patient prognosis. We characterized the immune cell composition to better understand the complexity and vital role that immune activity states of the TIME play in determining patient outcome.

GLUT1 and ASCT2 expression and their prognostic value in colorectal carcinoma.

Investigation of new molecular markers expressed in colorectal carcinoma can help to select patients getting benefits from new target therapeutic modalities. Investigation of expression of GLUT1 and ASCT2 in colorectal carcinoma. Sixty three colorectal resection specimens for cases diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma were included in the study. Full sections were examined for histopathological data including tumor type, grade, stage, and lymphovascular invasion were recorded. TMA blocks were constructed and immunostained with polyclonal antibodies for both GLUT1 and ASCT2. GLUT1 was expressed in 82% of cases while ASCT2 was expressed in 76% of cases. Statistically significant correlation was found between both GLUT1 and ASCT2. A statistically significant correlation was found between either marker with both disease stage and lymph node metastases. No significant correlation was found between either GLUT1 or ASCT2 and any of the clinical parameters as well as with disease-free survival. GLUT1 and ASCT2 are more prevalent in poorly differentiated and advanced stage colorectal carcinoma. Their expression in high percentage of cases can suggest the possible role of their target therapies in colorectal carcinoma.

Combining the potency of a neoantigen-expressing DNA vector, an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, and an attenuated poxvirus in a personalized immunization platform: Preclinical studies of ODI-2001.

e14674 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed cancer treatment. Their impressive effectiveness is crucially dependent on pre-existing neoepitope-specific immune responses. ODI-2001 aims at increasing the immune response against tumors by combining a DNA expressing multiple neoepitopes of the tumor, a MVA vaccinia virus as physiologic adjuvant and DNA carrier, and an anti-CTLA4 antibody as amplifier of the immune response. Methods: ODI-2001 was administered by repeated subcutaneous injections after tumor cells implantation in mice melanoma model B16F10 and colorectal cancer model CT26, and both before and after implantation in breast cancer model 4T1. In B16F10 model combination of ODI-2001 with anti-PD1 was assessed also. Neoepitopes were chosen from literature in B16F10 and CT26 models. In 4T1 model they were predicted using a dedicated neoepitope prediction algorithm (ImmunoEngine, myNEO, Gent, Belgium). Tumor volume and mice survival were assessed over time. Tumors were also analysed by immunofluorescence for immune cell infiltration. Each experiment received approval from the ethics committee for animals. Results: A significant improvement in survival was observed in mice treated with ODI-2001 in B16F10, and CT26 syngeneic mice models. In B16F10 the combination of ODI-2001 with anti-PD1 antibody demonstrated synergistic activity and a significant improvement in survival, while anti-PD1 alone or combined with anti-CTLA-4 failed to show any therapeutic effect (ODI-2001 + anti-PD1 vs. anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD1 p<0.01). ODI-2001 treatment was associated with tumor rejections in the three animal models. In 4T1 model the ImmunoEngine epitope prediction algorithm demonstrated an improved efficacy as compared to a set of neoepitopes chosen from the literature. In B16F10, following immunization with ODI-2001, an increased CD8 immune cell infiltration of the tumor was documented. ODI-2001 was well tolerated by the treated animals. Conclusions: These data demonstrate a significant antitumoral activity of ODI-2001 as a neoantigen immunization platform across different preclinical cancer models, both in monotherapy and combined with anti-PD1. ODI-2001 represents a promising option to induce de novo cancer-specific immune responses, potentially increasing the proportion of patients responding to immunotherapy treatments. Based on this preclinical program a phase I with ODI-2001 in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma is currently under preparation.

Are survival outcomes dependent on the tumour dose threshold of 139 Gy in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization using glass particles? A real-world single-centre study.

To compare the survival and objective response rate (ORR) of the patients receiving estimated tumour absorbed dose (ETAD) <140 Gy versus ETAD ≥140 Gy in patients with advanced chemorefractory colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (CRCLM) treated with yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE). Between August 2016 and August 2023 adult patients with unresectable, chemorefractory CRCLM treated with 90Y TARE using glass particles, were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and hepatic progression free survival (hPFS). Secondary outcome was ORR. A total of 40 patients with a mean age of 66.2 ± 7.8 years met the inclusion criteria. Mean ETAD for group 1 (ETAD <140 Gy) and group 2 (ETAD ≥140) were 131.2 ± 17.4 Gy versus 195 ± 45.6 Gy, respectively. The mean OS and hPFS for group 1 versus group 2 were 12 ± 10.3 months and 8.1 ± 9.3 months versus 9.3 ± 3 months and 7.1 ± 8.4 months, respectively and there were no significant differences (P = .181 and P = .366, respectively). ORR did not show significant difference between the groups (P = .432). In real-world practice, no significant difference was found in OS, hPFS, and ORR between patients who received ETAD <140 Gy versus ETAD ≥140 Gy in patients with CRCLM, in this series. This study demonstrated that increased tumour absorbed doses in radioembolization may not provide additional significant advantage for OS and hPFS for patients with CRCLM.

MRNA expression profiling of leptin and adiponectin and its receptors in colorectal carcinoma – Biomarker development

BackgroundMetastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the leading causes of mortality of colorectal CRC. Very few prognostic markers and factors affecting progression are studied between metastatic CRC and early CRC. Adipokines are speculated to be associated with this area of interest. In the current study leptin, leptin receptor (Ob-R), adiponectin, adiponectin R1, and adiponectin R2 expression were measured at gene levels to determine a possible association between adipokines and early/metastatic cancer to ultimately identifying a definitive diagnostic marker. Materials and methodsTissue samples were obtained from 62 patients with radical specimens of CRC. Genes expression was determined by Quantitative Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). The association between the clinicopathological parameters and gene expression levels were analyzed by statistical analysis. ResultsOverexpression of leptin mRNA is observed in small tumors (size< 5 cms) (P<0.05).b. Leptin receptor were overexpressed in advanced tumors (1.013 ± 0.152) than early tumors (0.453 ± 0.131). c.Adiponectin expression was higher in early tumors (1.535 ± 0.406) than in advanced tumors (0.48 ± 0.148). d. Distant organ metastasis shows under-expression of adipoR1. e.Overexpression of adipoR2 is seen in small (size<5 cms) (P<0.05) tumors. ConclusionLEPR is better indicator of advancement of tumor than Leptin. ADIPOR1 is a better indicator in advanced CRC than ADIPOR2 and ADIPOQ.

Effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with either mismatch repair proficient or metastatic microsatellite stable disease: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). ICIs, in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) possessing anti-angiogenic properties, serve as a potential strategy for circumventing the resistance exhibited by MSS or pMMR mCRC to immunotherapeutic interventions. The present study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ICIs + TKIs and provide a reference for the treatment of CRC. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to July 28, 2023. A total of 14 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analyses, with a total of 819 patients enrolled. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale scores of the 14 cohort studies included were ≥7, indicating they were of a high quality. The objective response rate (ORR) of ICIs + TKIs was 14% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.24; P=0.132] in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. The disease control rate (DCR) was 65% (95% CI, 0.58-0.74; P<0.0001). The overall incidence of adverse events of varying severity linked to combination of ICIs and TKIs in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC was 64% (95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P<0.0001). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse reactions was 24% (95% CI, 0.14-0.4; P<0.0001). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the exclusion of individual studies did not yield statistically significant variations in combined analysis results. Based on the examination of publication bias, ORR and DCR, Begg's and Egger's tests had P-values of 0.114 and 0.395, respectively. Overall publication bias overall was absent in the Begg's funnel plot, as there was no apparent asymmetry. Nonetheless, the P-values of the Egger's and Begg's tests for adverse reactions and adverse reactions grade ≥3 were P=0.008 and P=0.048, respectively. The asymmetry of the Begg's funnel plots was evident, suggesting the presence of potential publication bias regarding adverse event results. In conclusion, the combination of ICIs and TKIs demonstrates a favorable effectiveness and notable safety profile in the management of patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC.

The CSF-1R inhibitor pexidartinib affects FLT3-dependent DC differentiation and may antagonize durvalumab effect in patients with advanced cancers.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are a critical determinant of resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. This phase 1 study (MEDIPLEX, NCT02777710) investigated the safety and efficacy of pexidartinib, a CSF-1R-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) in patients with advanced colorectal and pancreatic carcinoma with the aim to enhance responses to PD-L1 blockade by eliminating CSF-1-dependent suppressive TAM. Forty-seven patients were enrolled. No unexpected toxicities were observed, one (2%) high microsatellite instability CRC patient had a partial response, and seven (15%) patients experienced stable disease as their best response. Increase of CSF-1 concentrations and decrease of CD14lowCD16high monocytes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) confirmed CSF-1R engagement. Treatment decreased blood dendritic cell (DC) subsets and impaired IFN-λ/IL-29 production by type 1 conventional DCs in ex vivo TLR3-stimulated PBMCs. Pexidartinib also targets c-KIT and FLT3, both key growth factor receptors of DC development and maturation. In patients, FLT3-L concentrations increased with pexidartinib treatment, and AKT phosphorylation induced by FLT3-L ex vivo stimulation was abrogated by pexidartinib in human blood DC subsets. In addition, pexidartinib impaired the FLT3-L- but not GM-CSF-dependent generation of DC subsets from murine bone marrow (BM) progenitors in vitro and decreased DC frequency in BM and tumor-draining lymph node in vivo. Our results demonstrate that pexidartinib, through the inhibition of FLT3 signaling, has a deleterious effect on DC differentiation, which may explain the limited antitumor clinical activity observed in this study. This work suggests that inhibition of FLT3 should be considered when combining TKIs with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of LR004, a Novel Antiepidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody.

LR004 is a novel chimeric (human/mouse) monoclonal antibody developed for the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma with detectable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression. We aimed to investigate the preclinical pharmacokinetics (PK) and in vivo biodistribution of LR004. The PK profiles of LR004 were initially established in rhesus monkeys. Subsequently, 125I radionuclide-labeled LR004 was developed and the biodistribution, autoradiography, and NanoSPECT/CT of 125I-LR004 in xenograft mice bearing A431 tumors were examined. The PK data revealed a prolonged half-life and nonlinear PK characteristics of LR004 within the dose range of 6-54 mg/kg. The radiochemical purity of 125I-LR004 was approximately 98.54%, and iodination of LR004 did not affect its specific binding activity to the EGFR antigen. In a classical biodistribution study, 125I-LR004 exhibited higher uptake in highly perfused organs than in poorly perfused organs. Prolonged retention properties of 125I-LR004 in tumors were observed at 4 and 10 days. Autoradiography and NanoSPECT/CT confirmed the sustained retention of 125I-LR004 at the tumor site in xenograft mice. These findings demonstrated the adequate tumor targeting capabilities of 125I-LR004 in EGFR-positive tumors, which may improve dosing strategies and future drug development.

An open-label clinical trial of RP2 and RP3 oncolytic immunotherapy in combination with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

TPS228 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition, in combination with other modalities, has demonstrated significant benefit in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair–deficient CRC. However, these agents have limited, if any, clinical benefit in pts with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair–proficient (pMMR) CRC. RP2 is an enhanced potency oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 which expresses the fusogenic gibbon ape leukemia virus glycoprotein with the R sequence deleted (GALV-GP-R–), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule; RP3 additionally expresses 4-1BB and CD40 activating ligands but does not express GM-CSF. Both agents have demonstrated preliminary safety and antitumor activity in pts with solid tumors. This study will evaluate the safety and activity of RP2 and RP3 in combination with atezolizumab (Atezo) plus bevacizumab (Bev) in pts with advanced MSS/pMMR CRC (NCT05733611). Methods: Pts with a histologic diagnosis of unresectable and/or metastatic CRC, with documented MSS or pMMR status, and previously treated with up to 3 standard-of-care systemic regimens will be enrolled in the RP2 + Atezo + Bev or RP3 + Atezo + Bev treatment groups (30 pts per group). Further key inclusion criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 and adequate hepatic, renal, and hematologic function. RP2/RP3 will be injected into tumors by direct or image-guided injection. Pts will receive 8 total doses of up to 10 mL of RP2 or RP3, with a first dose concentration of 1 × 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL, followed by 3 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 2 weeks, and then 4 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 3 weeks. Pts may receive a second course of up to 8 injections of RP2/RP3 if study criteria are met. Bev will be administered starting on week 1; Atezo will be administered starting week 7. The primary endpoint is objective response rate; secondary endpoints are safety, overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, and complete response rate. Antitumor activity will be evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as modified for this study. Safety will be assessed by physical examination, clinical laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and monitoring for adverse events (AEs; including serious AEs). Clinical trial information: NCT05733611 .

Serum angiopoietin-like protein 2 level in patients who received bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

209 Background: Anti-angiogenic agents are important for treating patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma, however, their efficacy is not long-lasting and survival benefits are modest. Reliable biomarkers and novel targets for angiogenesis are still required in this era. Angiopoietin-like protein 2 (AGLP-2) is an emerging biomarker for angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease, but its role in the oncology area is yet to be elucidated. Methods: Serum samples from patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy were retrospectively studied. Blood samples at baseline and at disease progression of the first line systemic therapy were selected. Serum angiopoietin-like protein 2 (AGLP-2) concentrations were measured using ELISA kit, serial changes, and the relationship with progression-free survival and overall survival on the systemic therapy were statistically analyzed. Results: 68 patients were enrolled. Their median age was 66 years old (range, 38-82), and 14 (20.6%) patients had metastatic lesions at 3 or 4 organs. The median serum AGLP-2 levels at baseline and at disease progression (PD) were 41,618 pg/ml (95% confidence interval (CI) 34,560-40,713), and 49,706 pg/ml (95% CI 39,853-49,017), respectively. There was a tendency of difference between AGLP-2 levels at baseline and at PD ( p=0.057). Patients whose baseline serum AGLP-2 levels with 40,000 pg/ml or above showed relatively shorter overall survival (median 31.4 months with 95% CI, 14.4-38.6) compared with patients with serum AGLP-2 level below 40,000 pg/ml at baseline (median 38.6 months with 95% CI, 23.6-127.3), but not statistically significant ( p=0.0946). There was no survival difference observed according to serum AGLP-2 levels at disease progression on the first line bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. Conclusions: Serum angiopoietin-like protein-2 has potential as a new target for novel anti-angiogenic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Analysis of an Unselected Patient Cohort With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma from a Maximum Care Center.

Systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) includes chemotherapy in combination with a targeted antibody. Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies are introduced for specific molecular subgroups. Prognostic relevant determinants are still under investigation. Systemic therapies of an unselected patient cohort with metastatic CRC were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment outcome was evaluated according to time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and frequency of conversion surgery and compared between subgroups stratified by primary tumor side, molecular profile, sex and age, and metastases sites. More than 50% of patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC underwent secondary resection after first-line systemic therapy. Rectum carcinoma had the best prognosis under anti-EGFR-antibody treatment. Female patients had a worse prognosis than male patients in late disease stage. Young patients demonstrated poor response to systemic therapy, but a high rate of conversion surgeries. Conversely, elderly patients benefited from systemic therapy but underwent surgery less frequently. Liver and lung metastases had a worse prognosis than other metastases sites, whereas lung metastases were more likely to be resected than liver metastases in early disease stage. Patient age, sex, primary tumor localization, and metastatic sites are prognostic factors that could guide future treatment decisions for the therapy of metastatic CRC.

Early Detection of Advanced Adenomas and Colorectal Carcinoma by Serum Glycoproteome Profiling

Early Detection of Advanced Adenomas and Colorectal Carcinoma by Serum Glycoproteome Profiling

Correlation between KRAS Mutation and CTLA-4 mRNA Expression in Circulating Tumour Cells: Clinical Implications in Colorectal Cancer.

Combination strategies of KRAS inhibition with immunotherapy in treating advanced or recurrent colorectal carcinoma (CRC) may need to be assessed in circulating tumour cells (CTCs) to achieve better clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the genomic variations of KRAS in CTCs and matched CRC tissues and compared mRNA expression of KRAS and CTLA-4 between wild-type and KRAS-mutated CTCs and CRC tissues. Clinicopathological correlations were also compared. Six known mutations of KRAS were identified at both codon 12 and codon 13 (c.35G>T/G12V, c.35G>A7/G12D, c.35G>C/G12A, c.34G>A/G12S, c.38G>C/G13A, and c.38G>A/G13D). Three CTC samples harboured the identified mutations (16.7%; 3/18), while fifteen matched primary tumour tissues (65.2%, 15/23) showed the mutations. CTCs harbouring the KRAS variant were different from matched CRC tissue. All the mutations were heterozygous. Though insignificant, CTLA-4 mRNA expression was higher in patients carrying KRAS mutations. Patients harbouring KRAS mutations in CTCs were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumours (p = 0.039) and with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.027) and perineural invasion (p = 0.014). KRAS mutations in CTCs were also significantly correlated with overall pathological stages (p = 0.027). These findings imply the genetic basis of KRAS with immunotherapeutic target molecules based on a real-time platform. This study also suggests the highly heterogeneous nature of cancer cells, which may facilitate the assessment of clonal dynamics across a single patient's disease.

Immune Marker Spatial Distribution and Clinical Outcome after PD-1 Blockade in Mismatch Repair-deficient, Advanced Colorectal Carcinomas.

Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) interaction has led to durable responses in fewer than half of patients with mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-d) advanced colorectal cancers. Immune contexture, including spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), may predict immunotherapy outcome. Immune contexture and spatial distribution, including cell-to-cell distance measurements, were analyzed by multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) in primary colorectal cancers with d-MMR (N = 33) from patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies. By digital image analysis, density, ratio, intensity, and spatial distribution of PD-L1, PD-1, CD8, CD3, CD68, LAG3, TGFβR2, MHC-I, CD14, B2M, and pan-cytokeratin were computed. Feature selection was performed by regularized Cox regression with LASSO, and a proportional hazards model was fitted to predict progression-free survival (PFS). For predicting survival among patients with MMR-d advanced colorectal cancer receiving PD-1 blockade, cell-to-cell distance measurements, but not cell densities or ratios, achieved statistical significance univariately. By multivariable feature selection, only mean number of PD-1+ cells within 10 μm of a PD-L1+ cell was significantly predictive of PFS. Dichotomization of this variable revealed that those with high versus low values had significantly prolonged PFS [median not reached (>83 months) vs. 8.5 months (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 4.7-NR)] with a median PFS of 28.4 months for all patients [adjusted HR (HRadj) = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.56; P = 0.005]. Expression of PD-1 was observed on CD8+ T cells; PD-L1 on CD3+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, macrophages (CD68+), and tumor cells. In d-MMR colorectal cancers, PD-1+ to PD-L1+ receptor to ligand proximity is a potential predictive biomarker for the effectiveness of PD-1 blockade.

P-58 An ongoing open-label, phase 2 trial of RP2 Or RP3 oncolytic immunotherapy in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

P-58 An ongoing open-label, phase 2 trial of RP2 Or RP3 oncolytic immunotherapy in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

An open-label clinical trial of RP2 and RP3 oncolytic immunotherapy in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

TPS3628 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition, in combination with other modalities, has demonstrated significant benefit in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient CRC. However, these agents have limited, if any, clinical benefit in pts with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) CRC. RP2 is an enhanced potency oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 which expresses the fusogenic gibbon ape leukemia virus glycoprotein with the R sequence deleted (GALV-GP-R–), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule; RP3 additionally expresses 4-1BB and CD40 activating ligands, but does not express GM-CSF. Both agents have demonstrated preliminary safety and efficacy in pts with solid tumors. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP2 and RP3 in combination with atezolizumab (Atezo) and bevacizumab (Bev) in pts with advanced MSS and pMMR CRC. Methods: Pts with a histologic diagnosis of unresectable and/or metastatic CRC, with documented MSS or pMMR status, and previously treated with up to 3 standard-of-care systemic regimens will be enrolled in the RP2 + Atezo + Bev or RP3 + Atezo + Bev treatment groups (30 pts per group). Further key inclusion criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 and adequate hepatic, renal, and hematologic function. RP2/RP3 will be injected into tumors by direct (including via colonoscope) or image-guided injection. Pts will receive 8 total doses of up to 10 mL of RP2 or RP3, with a first dose concentration of 1 × 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL, followed by 3 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 2 weeks, and then 4 doses of 1 × 107 PFU/mL every 3 weeks. Pts may receive a second course of up to 8 injections of RP2/RP3 if study criteria are met. Bev will be administered starting on day 1 (with first dose of RP2/RP3); Atezo will be administered starting week 7 on the same days as RP2/RP3. The primary endpoint is objective response rate; secondary endpoints are safety, overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, and complete response rate. Antitumor activity will be evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as modified for this study. Safety will be assessed by physical examination, clinical laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and monitoring for adverse events (AEs; including serious AEs). Clinical trial information: NCT05733611 .

Escherichia coli from biopsies differ in virulence genes between patients with colorectal neoplasia and healthy controls.

Pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli have been clearly identified as the causative agents of extraintestinal and diarrheal infections; however, the etiopathogenic role of E. coli in other conditions, including colorectal cancer, remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize mucosal E. coli isolates (n = 246) from 61 neoplasia patients and 20 healthy controls for the presence of 35 genetic determinants encoding known virulence factors. Virulence determinants encoding invasin (ibeA), siderophore receptor (iroN), S-fimbriae (sfa), and genotoxin (usp) were more prevalent among E. coli isolated from patients with neoplasia compared to the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, the prevalence of these virulence determinants was increased in more advanced neoplasia stages (p adj < 0.0125). Compared to patients with advanced colorectal adenoma and carcinoma, the ibeA gene was rarely found in the control group and among patients with non-advanced adenoma (p < 0.05), indicating its potential as the advanced-neoplasia biomarker. Patients with neoplasia frequently had E. coli strains with at least one of the abovementioned virulence factors, whereby specific combinations of these virulence factors were found. These findings suggest that E. coli strains isolated from patients with colorectal neoplasia possess several virulence factors, which could contribute to the development of neoplastic processes in the large intestine.

Integrated molecular profiling of RAS, BRAF mutations, and mismatch repair status in advanced colorectal carcinoma: insights from gender and tumor laterality.

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed forms of cancer worldwide. The RAS (KRAS, NRAS) and BRAF genes encode proteins that are important therapeutic targets for the treatment of CRC and, together with the mismatch repair (MMR) system, are closely related to patient prognosis and survival in advanced CRC. Here we evaluate the mutational profile and the frequency of mutations in the KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes, along with the expression of MMR in advanced CRC, at a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. A cross-sectional retrospective study was carried out, where molecular analysis of mutations in the KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes was carried out, as well as immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of 310 tumors revealed that 202 patients (65.2%) had mutations. The KRAS gene (53.2%) was the most frequently mutated in our sample, with G12D being the most frequent, representing 30.5% of the mutations in this gene. The most frequent mutation found in BRAF was V600E (n=25; 89.3%) and differed significantly in women and in the right colon in patients with MMR deficiency. Among the 283 patients tested for MMR, the rate of loss of expression was 8.8% (25/283). Deficiency in the MMR system is associated with the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation, tumors located in the right colon, and the female sex. In our case series, more than 60% of patients had at least one mutation in KRAS, NRAS, or BRAF. The presence of mutations in these genes is closely related to CRC prognosis and helps define the best therapeutic approach in patients with metastatic CRC.

Complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced colorectal carcinoma

Background: The prognosis of rectal cancer has improved with neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced disease. Twenty percent of patients respond to treatment with complete pathological regression, which is clinically estimated with magnetic resonance imaging. Aim: describe the properties of the pathological complete response group of patients at our institution Materials and methods: All selected patients received LCCRT at the University Hospital for Tumors Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, between January 2014 and December 2019 and were later surgically treated at the same facility. Results: We identified 23 patients with complete pathological responses, of which, despite surgery, seven progressed. We recorded a higher proportion of female patients in that group and younger age of onset. MRI preoperatively was not yet predictive of a complete pathological response. Conclusion: The proportion of patients with a complete pathological response is 16% in this cohort. All patients underwent surgery but did not receive consolidating therapy. About 30% progressed during the observed period.