Advanced Airway Interventions Research Articles

Safety and efficacy of the Tao facemask for positive pressure ventilation in morbidly obese patients

Purpose: Positive-pressure mask ventilation is an essential skill for individuals providing basic and advanced airway interventions in a variety of clinical settings. The C-E grip technique is most commonly used with standard facemasks to provide an effective seal that allows for positive pressure ventilation. The Tao mask is a novel facemask that utilises an ergonomic grip by using downwards pressure of the palm of the hand accompanied by midline jaw lift. Specifically, the technique to create a seal involves downwards pressure of the palm centred on the mask accompanied by a jaw lift with four fingers centred under the mandible. A previous comparison between the Tao and standard masks revealed superior performance across a cross-section of average patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Tao mask compared to the standard mask in a subset of patients with morbid obesity as defined by a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2. Methods: This prospective crossover trial included 156 patients aged ⩾18 years at the Medical University of South Carolina who were scheduled for elective surgery under general endotracheal anaesthesia with a BMI of ⩾40 kg/m2 at the time of surgery. After the induction of general anaesthesia, but prior to the administration of a neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD), each patient was ventilated with both the standard and Tao masks, and effectiveness was measured using both the Han and Warters scales. The process was repeated after the administration of an NMBD. Results: Data were collected and analysed from 153 individuals. The mean BMI was 50.7 ± 9.3 kg/m2. The Tao mask ventilation scores were significantly lower (more effective) than the standard mask scores on both the Han and Warters Scales before pre-NMBD ( p = 0.0002 and p < 0.001, respectively) and after post-NMBD ( p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). On the Warters Scale, it was significantly easier to ventilate with the Tao Mask pre-NMBD ( p = 0.0001). On the Han Scale, the Tao mask was significantly easier than the standard mask post-NMBD ( p = 0.03). With regard to mask sequence, the mean Warters scores were lower for the Tao mask pre-NMBD only when the standard mask was used first ( p = 0.002). Similarly, the difference in the mean Warters scores post-NBMD was significant only when the standard mask was used first ( p = 0.02). Conclusion: The Tao mask demonstrated equivalent safety and superior effectiveness in ventilating morbidly obese surgical patients despite a trial design that favoured the standard mask owing to anaesthetist experience. The use of the Tao mask may be particularly beneficial in clinical situations involving inexperienced operators or in patients for whom mask ventilation is likely to be difficult. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03473366

Centiles for the shock index among injured children in the prehospital setting

ObjectiveThe shock index (SI), the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, is a clinical tool for assessing injury severity. Age-adjusted SI models may improve predictive value for injured children in the out-of-hospital setting. We sought to characterize the proportion of children in the prehospital setting with an abnormal SI using established criteria, describe the age-based distribution of SI among injured children, and determine prehospital interventions by SI. MethodsWe performed a multi-agency retrospective cross-sectional study of children (<18 years) in the prehospital setting with a scene encounter for suspected trauma and transported to the hospital between 2018 and 2022 using the National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Information System datasets. Our exposure of interest was the first calculated SI. We identified the proportion of children with an abnormal SI when using the SI, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA); and the pediatric SI (PSI) criteria. We developed and internally validated an age-based distributional model for the SI using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape to describe the age-based distribution of the SI as a centile or Z-score. We evaluated EMS interventions (basic airway interventions, advanced airway interventions, cardiac interventions, vascular access, intravenous fluids, and vasopressor use) in relation to both the SIPA, PSI, and distributional SI values. ResultsWe analyzed 1,007,863 pediatric EMS trauma encounters (55.0% male, median age 13 years [IQR, 8–16 years]). The most common dispatch complaint was for traffic/transport related injury (32.9%). When using the PSI and SIPA, 13.1% and 16.3% were classified as having an abnormal SI, respectively. There were broad differences in the percentage of encounters classified as having an abnormal SI across the age range, varying from 5.1 to 22.8% for SIPA and 3.7–20.1% for PSI. The SIPA values ranged from the 75th to 95th centiles, while the PSI corresponded to an SI greater than the 90th centile, except in older children. The centile distribution for SI declined during early childhood and stabilized during adolescence and demonstrated a difference of <0.1% at cutoff values. An abnormal PSI, SIPA and higher SI centiles (>90th centile and >95th centiles) were associated with interventions related to basic and advanced airway management, cardiac procedures, vascular access, and provision of intravenous fluids occurred with greater frequency at higher SI centiles. Some procedures, including airway management and vascular access, had a smaller peak at lower (<10th) centiles. DiscussionWe describe the empiric distribution of the pediatric SI across the age range, which may overcome limitations of extant criteria in identifying patients with shock in the prehospital setting. Both high and low SI values were associated with important, potentially lifesaving EMS interventions. Future work may allow for more precise identification of children with significant injury using cutpoint analysis paired to outcome-based criteria. These may additionally be combined with other physiologic and mechanistic criteria to assist in triage decisions.

Pediatric Intubations in a Semiurban Helicopter Emergency Medicine Service: A Retrospective Review

ObjectiveAlthough a small proportion of helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) missions are for pediatric patients, it is recognized that children do present unique challenges. This case series aims to evaluate the intubation first-pass success rate in HEMS pediatric patients for both medical and trauma patients in a UK semiurban environment. MethodsA retrospective review of the computerized records system was performed from January 1, 2015, to July 31, 2022, at 1 UK HEMS. Anonymous data relating to advanced airway interventions in patients < 16 years of age were extracted. Primary analysis related to the first-pass success rate was performed; secondary analysis relating to the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of the pediatric patients requiring prehospital anesthesia (rapid sequence induction with drugs) and first-pass success rates by clinician group was also performed. ResultsOf the pediatric patients, 15.8% required intubation. The overall first-pass success rate for intubation (including in cardiac arrest) was 83.5%; for prehospital anesthesia (drugs administered), it was 98.4%. First-pass success rates were lowest for those under 2 years of age (45.2% without drugs and 87.5% with drugs). There was no difference between physician background in the first-pass success rate. The median GCS for pediatric prehospital anesthesia was 7 versus 5 for adults (P = .012). No children with an initial GCS of 15 had prehospital anesthesia. ConclusionThe overall intubation first-pass success rates for pediatric patients is high at 83.5% and higher still for prehospital anesthesia (98.4%). However, it remains a rare intervention for clinicians, and children under 2 years of age require special consideration.

Non-theatre emergency airway management: a multicentre prospective observational study.

Emergency airway management events are common, unpredictable and associated with high complication rates. This multicentre prospective observational study across eight acute NHS hospitals in southeast England reports the incidence and nature of non-theatre emergency airway management events. Data were collected from non-theatre emergency airway management, including adverse events, over a continuous 28-day window, and recorded on an electronic case report form. Events were classified according to type (advanced airway; simple airway; and cardiac arrest). A total of 166 events were recorded, with 111 advanced airway events involving tracheal intubation or tracheostomy management. Senior personnel with three or more years of airway management experience were present for 105/111 (95%) advanced airway management episodes. There was a significant reduction in consultant or equivalent presence out-of-hours (21/64, 33%) vs. in-hours (34/47, 72%) (p < 0.001). We found high utilisation of videolaryngoscopy (95/106, 90%) and universal use of capnography for all advanced airway management events. This was lower during cardiac arrest when videolaryngoscopy was used in 11/16 (69%) of tracheal intubations and capnography in 21/32 (66%) of all cardiac arrest episodes. Adverse outcomes during advanced airway management (excluding during cardiac arrest) occurred in 53/111 (48%) episodes, including hypoxia (desaturation to Sp O2 < 80% in 14/111, 13%) and hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg in 27/111, 25%). Adverse outcomes were not associated with time of day or experience level of airway practitioners. We conclude that there is a disparity between consultant presence for advanced airway interventions in- and out-of-hours; high utilisation of videolaryngoscopy and capnography, especially for advanced airway interventions; and a high incidence of hypotension and hypoxaemia, including critical values, during non-theatre airway management.

Out-of-Hospital emergency airway management practices: A nationwide observational study from Aotearoa New Zealand

Background and ObjectivesAirway management is crucial for emergency care in critically ill patients outside the hospital setting. An Airway Registry is useful in providing essential information for quality improvement purposes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an out-of-hospital airway registry and describe airway management practices in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). MethodsData from the Aotearoa New Zealand Paramedic Care Collection (ANZPaCC) database were used in a retrospective cohort study covering July 2020 to June 2021. All patients receiving airway interventions were included. An airway intervention was defined as one or more of the following: non-drug assisted endotracheal intubation (NDA-ETI), drug-assisted endotracheal intubation (DA-ETI; where a combination of paralytic agent and sedative were used to aid in intubation), laryngeal mask airway (LMA), oropharyngeal airway (OPA), nasopharyngeal airway (NPA), surgical airway (cricothyroidotomy), suction, jaw thrust. Descriptive statistics were analysed using Chi-Square and logistic regression modelling investigated the relationship between advanced airway success and patient characteristics. ResultsThe study included 4,529 patients who underwent 7,779 airway interventions. Basic airway interventions were used most frequently: OPA (45.1%), NPA (29.3%), LMA (28.9%), suction (19.9%) and jaw thrust (17.6%). Advanced airway interventions were used less frequently: NDA-ETI (19.8%), DA-ETI (8.7%), and surgical airways (0.2%). The success rate for ETI (including both NDA-ETI and DA-ETI) was 89.4%, with NDA-ETI success at 85.8% and DA-ETI success at 97.7%. ETI first-pass success rates were significantly lower for males (aOR 0.65, 95%CI 0.48–0.87, p < 0.001) and higher for non-cardiac arrest injury patients (aOR 2.94, 95%CI 1.43–6.00, p < 0.001). In this cohort receiving airway interventions the 1-day mortality rate was 41.1%, demonstrating that a high proportion of these patients were severely clinically compromised. ConclusionsOut-of-hospital airway management practices and success rates in AoNZ are comparable to those elsewhere. This research has determined the variables to be used as the AoNZ Paramedic Airway Registry ongoing and has demonstrated baseline outcomes in airway management for ongoing quality improvement using this registry.

Lessons from the first two years of a new out-of-hospital airway registry in New South Wales

Background Advanced airway interventions, including endotracheal intubation (ETI) and supraglottic airway devices (iGel®), are used for airway management. Advanced airway proficiency is critical to maintain patient safety. Airway registries are commonly used quality assurance tools that can drive system-level improvement. This study analyses the first two years of data from a new prehospital airway registry. Methods This is a retrospective review of the first two years of an airway registry for Intensive Care Paramedics in New South Wales Ambulance spanning 8 August 2020 to 8 August 2022. Changes in airway management effectiveness were examined as a time series and analysis proceeded regression using Newey–West standard errors. Additionally, a machine learning algorithm (generalised boosted model) was used to predict successful ETI. Results There were 872 unique advanced airway episodes suitable for analysis. Of 705 patients that had received ETI, 655 were successful resulting in an overall success rate of 92.9%. Intubation was achieved on the first attempt in 573 out of 705 (81.3%) patients. Supraglottic airway insertion was successful in 193 of 222 patients (86.9%). The first-pass success for the iGel® supraglottic device was 183 of 222 (82.4%). Considerable increases in ETI and iGel® first-pass success were observed over time. A machine learning analysis demonstrated that factors predicting success for endotracheal intubation included airway-grade, patient age, the use of video laryngoscopy, patient weight and the use of external laryngeal manipulation/bi-manual laryngoscopy. Conclusions This prehospital airway registry analysis demonstrates increasing advanced airway success over the first two years of registry implementation. These increases may be explained in part by the reflective feedback and awareness of airway management that results from the registry, training and the increased use of video laryngoscopy.

Prehospital Trauma Airway Management: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document

Definitive management of trauma is not possible in the out-of-hospital environment. Rapid treatment and transport of trauma casualties to a trauma center are vital to improve survival and outcomes. Prioritization and management of airway, oxygenation, ventilation, protection from gross aspiration, and physiologic optimization must be balanced against timely patient delivery to definitive care. The optimal prehospital airway management strategy for trauma has not been clearly defined; the best choice should be patient-specific. NAEMSP recommends: The approach to airway management and the choice of airway interventions in a trauma patient requires an iterative, individualized assessment that considers patient, clinician, and environmental factors. Optimal trauma airway management should focus on meeting the goals of adequate oxygenation and ventilation rather than on specific interventions. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians should perform frequent reassessments to determine if there is a need to escalate from basic to advanced airway interventions. Management of immediately life-threatening injuries should take priority over advanced airway insertion. Drug-assisted airway management should be considered within a comprehensive algorithm incorporating failed airway options and balanced management of pain, agitation, and delirium. EMS medical directors must be highly engaged in assuring clinician competence in trauma airway assessment, management, and interventions.

Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

1. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the foundation of resuscitation. New data reaffirm the key components of high-quality CPR: providing adequate chest compression rate and depth, minimizing interruptions in CPR, allowing full chest recoil between compressions, and avoiding excessive ventilation. 2. A respiratory rate of 20 to 30 breaths per minute is new for infants and children who are (a) receiving CPR with an advanced airway in place or (b) receiving rescue breathing and have a pulse. 3. For patients with nonshockable rhythms, the earlier epinephrine is administered after CPR initiation, the more likely the patient is to survive. 4. Using a cuffed endotracheal tube decreases the need for endotracheal tube changes. 5. The routine use of cricoid pressure does not reduce the risk ofd regurgitation during bag-mask ventilation and may impede intubation success. 6. For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bag-mask ventilation results in the same resuscitation outcomes as advanced airway interventions such as endotracheal intubation. 7. Resuscitation does not end with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Excellent post–cardiac arrest care is critically important to achieving the best patient outcomes. For children who do not regain consciousness after ROSC, this care includes targeted temperature management and continuous electroencephalography monitoring. The prevention and/or treatment of hypotension, hyperoxia or hypoxia, and hypercapnia or hypocapnia is important. 8. After discharge from the hospital, cardiac arrest survivors can have physical, cognitive, and emotional challenges and may need ongoing therapies and interventions. 9. Naloxone can reverse respiratory arrest due to opioid overdose, but there is no evidence that it benefits patients in cardiac arrest. 10. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis is based on patient response and requires frequent reassessment. Balanced crystalloid, unbalanced crystalloid, and colloid fluids are all acceptable for sepsis resuscitation. Epinephrine or norepinephrine infusions are used for fluid-refractory septic shock. More than 20 000 infants and children have a cardiac arrest per year in the …

Neck injuries – israel defense forces 20 years' experience

BackgroundNeck injuries are an important cause of combat mortality and morbidity. This study's objective was to examine the characteristics and causes of neck injuries among Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and emphasize the best treatment protocols for the advanced life support providers in the prehospital combat environment. MethodsThe IDF Trauma Registry (IDF-TR) includes prehospital data regarding casualties treated by the IDF's medical forces. This study was a retrospective, observational study that included all casualties who were injured between January 2006 and December 2018. ResultsBetween January 2016 and December 2018, 3294 casualties were recorded. During the study period, 1% (41/3,394) of all injury casualties in the registry were isolated neck injuries compared to 94% (3185/3,394) without neck injury. 42% (14/41) percent of the neck casualties were classified as urgent compared to 26% (830/3185, P = 0.09) in the no neck group. The most frequent type of injury mechanism in the neck casualties was penetrating injury (54% 22/41), mostly due to shrapnel (68% 15/22). 60% of neck injured personnel were injured during the 2nd Lebanon War and Operation Protective Edge in high-intensity conflicts. As for life-saving interventions, advanced airway interventions were performed in 12% of neck injured group (5/41) compared to 3% (104/3185, P = 0.02) in the no neck group. We revealed that cricothyroidotomy was performed in almost 10% (4/41) of neck injured casualties compared to only 1% (19/3185, P<0.0001) in no neck casualties. As for damage control resuscitation, neck injury casualties received higher amounts of Fresh Dried Plasma 7% (3/41) Vs. 1% (32/3185, P = 0.02) and Tranexamic acid 15% (6/41) Vs. 4% (124/3185, P = 0.01) compared to non-neck casualties. ConclusionsMilitary neck injuries are a significant cause of substantial disability and result in incompatibility with combat duties in previously healthy soldiers. Prompt medical care, especially urgent hemodynamic and airway management, is paramount in these injuries. Routine use of designated neck protection might lower the number of neck injuries, mitigate their severity, and even decrease mortality. Level of EvidenceLevel III (Retrospective study with up to two negative criteria)

2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the third annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the role of cardiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, vasopressors in adults, advanced airway interventions in adults and children, targeted temperature management in children after cardiac arrest, initial oxygen concentration during resuscitation of newborns, and interventions for presyncope by first aid providers. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of the evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence to Decision Framework Highlights sections. The task forces also listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the third annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. It addresses the most recent published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts. This summary addresses the role of cardiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, vasopressors in adults, advanced airway interventions in adults and children, targeted temperature management in children after cardiac arrest, initial oxygen concentration during resuscitation of newborns, and interventions for presyncope by first aid providers. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the certainty of the evidence on the basis of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in the Justification and Evidence to Decision Framework Highlights sections. The task forces also listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical services augment ground ambulance paediatric airway management in urban areas: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesPaediatric intubation is a high-risk procedure for ground emergency medical services (GEMS). Physician-staffed helicopter EMS (PS-HEMS) may bring additional skills, drugs and equipment to the scene including advanced airway management...

111 Learning and informing on paediatric emergency department intubations

Advanced airway interventions are high risks, high stakes, but low frequency events for children in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs), with serious consequences for morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe the providers, techniques, success rates, and adverse event rates of intubation in one of Canada’s busiest PEDs and Level 1 pediatric trauma center. Information on team member perception of the quality of communication and effectiveness of leadership were also evaluated. A prospective cohort QI project was undertaken to investigate intubation events at one Canadian PED between 2013 and 2018. Providers who were involved in the airway management recorded intubation data via a web-based data collection tool. The aim of the project was to collect data about intubation events with relevant patient demographics, reason for intubation, personnel, number of attempts to intubate, techniques used, medications used, and adverse event rates. Providers were also asked to rate the effectiveness of team communication and intubation event congruity on a scale from 1 to 100. Descriptive statistics for each intubation attempt, as well as time-trended use by year are reported here. In total, 292 PED intubation reports were completed by respiratory therapists (26.0%), fellows (23.3%), staff physicians (23.3%), documenting nurses (16.4%), and charge nurses (10.6%). Intubation indications were airway protection (65.1%), respiratory failure (40.4%), or inadequate oxygenation (18.8%). Fellows managed the majority (60.3%) of initial intubation attempts followed by resident physicians (17.8%). Fentanyl (26.0%) and Ketamine (26.4%) were the induction agents most often used; Rocuronium was the most common paralytic agent used (49.7%). In terms of intubation equipment, laryngoscope was most commonly used (55.1%), followed by glidescope (26.4%). On first attempt intubation, the most common adverse events reported were hypoxemia (5.5%), hypotension (3.1%), and aspiration/airway compromise (3.1%). Personnel involved in the intubation event reported a high mean team communication effectiveness (81.58, SD 16.81) and a high mean intubation event congruity (82.99, SD 16.75). Throughout the duration of this project, iterative systemic interventions occurred in our PED which may have contributed to the changes observed (introduction of standardized RSI order sets, VL equipment, standardization of trauma leadership, and finally introduction of an airway checklist). The present study offers some insight into PED intubations, a relatively understudied area. Overall, there was a high first-attempt intubation success rate with few adverse events reported. In terms of team dynamics, personnel rated both team communication and congruity as high.

Best practice advice on pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia & advanced airway management

BackgroundEffective and timely airway management is a priority for sick and injured patients. The benefit and conduct of pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia (PHEA) and advanced airway management remains controversial but there are a proportion of critically ill and injured patients who require urgent advanced airway management prior to hospital arrival. This document provides current best practice advice for the provision of PHEA and advanced airway management.MethodThis best practice advice was developed from EHAC Medical Working Group enforced by pre-hospital critical care experts. The group used a nominal group technique to establish the current best practice for the provision of PHEA and advanced airway management. The group met on three separate occasions to discuss and develop the guideline. All members of the working party were able to access and edit the guideline online.ResultsThis EHAC best practice advice covers all areas of PHEA and advanced airway management and provides up to date evidence of current best practice.ConclusionPHEA and advanced airway management are complex interventions that should be delivered by appropriately trained personnel using a well-rehearsed approach and standardised equipment. Where advanced airway interventions cannot be delivered, careful attention should be given to applying basic airway interventions and ensuring their effectiveness at all times.

Timing and sequence of advanced airway interventions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is one of the time-dependent interventions for providing oxygenation and ventilation in patients with cardiac arrest. However, the best strategy for managing the airway after cardiac arrest has yet to be determined.

Impact of prehospital airway management on combat mortality

IntroductionAnalysis of modern military conflicts suggests that airway compromise remains the second leading cause of preventable death of combat fatalities. This study compares outcomes of combat casualties that received prehospital airway interventions, specifically bag valve mask (BVM) ventilation, cricothyrotomy, and supraglottic airway (SGA) placement. The goal is to compare the effectiveness of airway management strategies used in the military pre-hospital setting. MethodsThis retrospective chart review of 1267 US Army medical evacuation patient care records, compared outcomes of casualties that received prehospital advanced airway interventions. The patients consisted of US military injured in Operation Enduring Freedom January 2011–March 2014. Compared outcomes consisted of vent-, ICU-, and hospital-free days. ResultsThose with SGA placement experienced fewer vent-free days, ICU-free days, and hospital-free days compared to BVM and cricothyrotomy patients. The groups did not significantly differ in rates of 30-day survival. The odds for survival were not significantly higher for BVM versus SGA patients (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.2–9.8), cricothyrotomy versus SGA patients (OR 3.9, 95% CI 0.6–24.9), or cricothyrotomy versus BVM patients (OR 2.7, 95% CI 0.5–13.8) in a logistic regression model adjusting for GCS. ConclusionThis study supports prehospital BVM ventilation as a possible alternative to cricothyrotomy as there was no difference in measured outcomes between the groups. It further cautions against SGA use in the prehospital combat setting due to higher morbidity demonstrated by fewer ventilator, hospital, and ICU free days than those receiving cricothyrotomy or BVM ventilation. There was no difference in 30-day survival between the groups.

The emergency surgical airway.

Discussions about emergency surgical airway or front of neck access (FONA) can provoke vigorous debate and strike fear into the hearts of air- way clinicians. The 'can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate' (CICO) situation requires prompt and decisive action, and it is important that all clinicians performing advanced airway interventions have a well-considered plan for this rare scenario. Due to the nature and infrequency of CICO events, evidence is largely limited to case series, synthetic models, live animal models and cadaveric human studies. Consensus opinion predominates. In this article, we attempt to draw on the currently available evidence and recently published CICO guidelines to answer common questions that emergency airway practitioners might encounter. Our aim is to provide and justify simple recommendations for this high-stakes emergency situation.

Advanced airway interventions in the trapped (racing) driver: a randomised cross-over trial

Advanced airway interventions in the trapped (racing) driver: a randomised cross-over trial

The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BackgroundPre-hospital basic airway interventions can be ineffective at providing adequate oxygenation and ventilation in some severely ill or injured patients, and advanced airway interventions are then required. Controversy exists regarding the level of provider required to perform successful pre-hospital intubation. A previous meta-analysis reported pre-hospital intubation success rates of 0.849 for non-physicians versus 0.991 for physicians. The evidence base on the topic has expanded significantly in the last 10 years. This study systematically reviewed recent literature and presents comprehensive data on intubation success rates.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed using PRISMA methodology to identify articles on pre-hospital tracheal intubation published between 2006 and 2016. Overall success rates were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. The relationship between intubation success rate and provider type was assessed in weighted linear regression analysis.ResultsOf the 1838 identified studies, 38 met the study inclusion criteria. Intubation was performed by non-physicians in half of the studies and by physicians in the other half. The crude median (range) reported overall success rate was 0.969 (0.616–1.000). In random effects meta-analysis, the estimated overall intubation success rate was 0.953 (0.938–0.965). The crude median (range) reported intubation success rates for non-physicians were 0.917 (0.616–1.000) and, for physicians, were 0.988 (0.781–1.000) (p = 0.003).DiscussionThe reported overall success rate of pre-hospital intubation has improved, yet there is still a significant difference between non-physician and physician providers. The finding that less-experienced personnel perform less well is not unexpected, but since there is considerable evidence that poorly performed intubation carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality careful consideration should be given to the training and experience required to deliver this intervention safely.

ECMO retrieval: A case for Critical Care Paramedic integration into the team

ECMO retrieval: A case for Critical Care Paramedic integration into the team