Advanced Practice Registered Nurses Research Articles

Medical Science Liaisons: A Guide for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses

Medical science liaisons (MSLs) are part of the field medical affairs (FMA) department of pharmaceutical companies and are scientific resources for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). Following strict regulations and antikickback statutes, MSLs operate differently from sales and engage in unbiased, nonpromotional scientific exchange to provide clinical resources to APRNs. They also collaborate with shareholders like professional organizations, clinical trial sites, and academic institutions. Understanding MSL engagement allows APRNs multiple avenues both externally and within the pharmaceutical industry to leverage their experience to enhance clinical practice.

Clinician Staffing and Quality of Care in US Health Centers

Health centers are vital primary care safety nets for underserved populations, but optimal clinician staffing associated with quality care is unclear. Understanding the association of clinician staffing patterns with quality of care may inform care delivery, scope-of-practice policy, and resource allocation. To describe the association of clinician staffing models and ratios with quality-of-care metrics in health centers. This cross-sectional study of US health centers used data from the 2022 Health Resources and Services Administration Uniform Data System (UDS). Clinician staffing ratios, expressed as the fraction of full-time equivalents (FTEs) per 1000 visits of physicians, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), and physician associates (PAs) to total clinician FTEs at each health center. Percentage of eligible patients receiving the corresponding service or outcome for 14 individual clinical quality metrics collected by the UDS, including infant immunizations; screening for cancer, depression, tobacco use, hypertension, HIV, and glycated hemoglobin levels; weight and body mass index (BMI) assessment; and appropriate statin, aspirin, and/or antiplatelet therapy. This analysis of 791 health centers serving 16 114 842 patients (56.6% female) identified 5 clinician staffing models: balanced (similar FTEs of physicians, APRNs, and PAs; 152 [19.2%] of health centers), higher FTEs of APRNs than physicians (174 [22.0%]), higher FTEs of physicians than APRNs (160 [20.2%]), approximately equal FTEs of physicians and APRNs (263 [33.2%]), and large scale (42 [5.3%]). Adjusted linear models showed positive associations between physician FTEs per 1000 visits and cervical (β, 14.9; 95% CI, 3.1-26.7), breast (β, 15.7; 95% CI, 3.2-28.1), and colorectal (β, 18.3; 95% CI, 6.0-30.6) cancer screening. Generalized additive models showed nonlinear positive associations beginning at a physician FTE ratio of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.02-6.22) for infant vaccinations, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.05-2.21) for cervical cancer screening, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.02-1.67) for breast cancer screening, 0.47 (95% CI, 0.00-5.76) for HIV testing, and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.18-19.96) for depression in remission; APRN FTE ratio of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.17-7.46) for adult BMI assessment; and PA FTE ratio of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-3.88) for infant vaccinations. Staffing models were not associated with 7 of the 14 metrics analyzed. In this cross-sectional study of health centers, physician FTE ratio was associated with higher performance in cancer screening, infant vaccinations, and HIV testing; APRN FTE ratio was associated with higher performance in preventative health assessments; and PA FTE ratio was associated with higher performance in infant vaccination. These findings suggest that targeted staffing strategies may be associated with quality of care in certain domains and that tailored approaches to health center staffing based on community-specific needs are warranted.

The Impact of Allyship on Minoritized Patients and Providers in Palliative Practice

Many minoritized patients experience discrimination in health care. The same is true for minoritized health care clinicians, including the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN). Specifically, Black Americans have historically and disproportionally been privy to both structural racism and interpersonal racial discrimination (J Subst Abuse Treat 2022;133:108551). For patients, such exposure is associated with physical and mental health consequences, including hypertension, obesity, depression, anxiety, psychological distress, and mortality (Health Serv Res 2019;54 suppl 2(suppl 2):1399–1408). For minoritized clinicians, the subsequent result of discrimination additionally includes poor job satisfaction, decreased productivity, and high turnover (JAMA Health Forum 2023;4(12):e235249). Allyship, the act of supporting minoritized individuals while not being a member of that group, is potentially useful in improving the practice experience of minoritized APRNs, as well as positively impacting minoritized patients’ outcomes. This article aims to provide actionable and practical skills for the APRN to create safe spaces for minoritized patients and partners in palliative practice. Explicitly, the role of the palliative care APRN as an ally will be reviewed as well as guidance on how to implement changes that will affect the health care experience for both patients and clinicians.

"I never thought of it as payment": Qualitative evaluation of workshops with advanced practice registered nurses on pharmaceutical industry payment reporting.

With the expansion of professional autonomy and prescriptive authority of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), interactions with industry are under greater scrutiny. As of July 1, 2021, pharmaceutical and medical device companies must publicly report all payments to APRNs through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Open Payments website. To gauge APRNs' familiarity with, and perceptions of the Open Payments database and discuss whether and how APRNs should respond. Virtual workshops consisting of a didactic presentation and interactive exercises with APRNs recruited through professional networks, associations, and conferences. Transcripts were analyzed using a qualitative interpretive approach, grounded in an everyday ethics theoretical framework. Thirty-six APRN clinicians, students, and faculty participated in nine workshops. Seeing sponsored meals reported in Open Payments as "payments" prompted participants to see familiar interactions in a new way. Participants valued the enhanced transparency as a way to identify risks of bias but were concerned that reporting might undermine public trust in APRNs. Emphasizing awareness as a precursor to action, participants desired greater preparation for ensuring independence in practice. The importance of tackling the ethical issues associated with industry interactions is heightened within the context of an existing climate of distrust within health care. However, many participants were concerned about the effects of transparency on public trust rather than how APRNs individually or collectively can be more trustworthy. Open Payments can serve as a useful tool to catalyze broader conversations about ethics, integrity in decision making, and health policy advocacy.

Gender differences in factors associated with rural health care practice in Minnesota.

To understand gender differences in factors affecting rural health care workforce to inform the development of effective policies and recruitment strategies to address rural health care workforce shortages. A cross-sectional survey of health care professionals (including Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), physicians, physician assistants (PAs), and registered nurses (RNs)) in Minnesota was administered by the Minnesota Department of Health from October 18, 2021, to July 25, 2022, during their professional license renewal. The main outcome was whether or not the respondent was practicing in a rural area. The effects of factors associated with rural practice were estimated using binary logistic regression models, and subsequently subgroup analysis was conducted by gender across the four health care professions. Results show that although there were significant gender differences in some factors (growing up in a rural area and family considerations were more likely to influence women's decisions than men's, whereas men were more likely to be influenced by the prospect of having autonomy and broad scope of practice than women), these differences became insignificant when the four health care professionals were analyzed separately suggesting that overall gender differences observed were almost entirely explained by profession differences. Gender differences do not significantly influence the factors impacting rural practice. However, being raised in a rural environment emerges as the most influential predictor of rural practice underscoring the importance of involving rural residents of all genders in health care practice.

Improving the evaluation of novice advanced practice nurse transition.

Novice advanced practice registered nurses (RNs) experience decreased self-confidence, anxiety, and identity confusion in their first year of practice, which leads to poor job satisfaction and turnover. Advanced practice RN fellowship programs, developed to bridge the gap from the RN to the advanced practice role, lack standardized measures for program evaluation. A large Midwestern pediatric hospital's advanced practice nurse fellowship program lacks a structured program evaluation. A quasi-experimental evidence-based improvement project was implemented to evaluate fellowship program outcomes for novice nurse practitioner transition and retention. All novice advanced practice RNs (APRNs) were enrolled in the site's 12-month APRN fellowship program. The transition experiences of enrollees who completed the fellowship program were assessed using the novice nurse practitioner role transition scale. In addition, role transition scores were compared for two subgroups: fellows in acute care and fellows in primary care roles. Fellowship participant retention 1 year after hire was measured. Postintervention data showed that most fellowship graduates had a positive transition experience as evidenced by at least a 4.33/6.0 mean total novice nurse practitioner role transition score. There was not a statistically significant difference between the transition scores of the acute care fellows and primary care fellows. The APRN fellowship program was effective in promoting a successful role transition from RN to novice APRN. Similar APRN fellowship programs may benefit from using this tool for program evaluation.

Giving Your Preceptors What They Need: Developing an Innovative Clinical Preceptor Education Program.

Advanced practice registered nursing (APRN) educational programs require students to complete many hours of clinical education to prepare them for their role. This article outlines the process of developing a novel nurse anesthesia preceptor training program that could be implemented by any graduate APRN program. Preceptors' requests for specific information about how to best educate students served as a catalyst to develop a customized preceptor training program tailored to the needs of the program, the preceptors, and students to optimize clinical education and improve quality of care.

Chronicling the pursuit for full practice authority in Tennessee: Recommendations for a path forward

BackgroundThe quest for full practice authority (FPA) for Tennessee Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) began with promise in the late 1960s. However, progress has stalled in the ensuing time, and prospects for advancing FPA do not look promising. PurposeThe purpose of this article is to chronicle the pursuit of FPA in Tennessee, offer reflections on what has transpired to date, and suggest a path forward. MethodsVarious data from various sources were used to chronicle the history of FPA in Tennessee, make the case for its need, and identify better approaches for success. DiscussionAs one of a dwindling number of states without FPA, access to primary care health services and the economic vitality of Tennessee communities are of concern. ConclusionThe path forward for achieving FPA in Tennessee necessitates changes in approach and players. Specific recommendations are offered.

Mentorship Impact for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses

Limited research exists on mentorship’s impact on advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). In this study, 632 APRNs were surveyed at a single academic medical center and its associated health system. Results indicate that those with mentors were twice as likely to mentor others and achieve academic rank. Mentorship has an impact for APRNs and promotes academic and professional development.

Collaborative nursing education between advanced practice registered nurses

The surge in healthcare demands due to the explosion of growth in the aging adult population demands that academic institutions address enhanced education of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs). This is particularly challenging amidst nurse faculty shortages in specialty areas, stemming from factors such as lack of pay competitiveness with clinical positions, and doctoral-prepared nurses seeking faculty positions. Despite efforts to address the shortages, recruitment challenges persist, necessitating innovative approaches. This article explores the interprofessional collaborative teaching between Nurse Anesthesia (NA) and Adult Gerontology Nurse Practitioner (NP) programs, focusing on airway management, sedation techniques, chest X-ray interpretation, and ultrasound skills. To date, this collaboration between NA and NP faculty has proven effective. Both synchronous and online asynchronous teaching have received overwhelmingly positive student feedback. Ongoing communication and collaborations between NA and NP faculty facilitate teaching and educational strategies across programs, sharing faculty expertise, and mitigating reduced faculty numbers. This innovative model benefits faculty and students and provides a platform for firsthand interprofessional collaboration, fostering mutual respect and preparing students for effective interdisciplinary healthcare teamwork.

Timing of stroke survivors' hospital readmissions to guide APRNs in primary care.

Caring for patients after a neurovascular incident is common for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). Most neurological readmission studies focus on a small subset of neurovascular incident groups, but advanced practice nurses in primary care attend to a diverse neurovascular population and lack time to adequately search hospital records. The aim of this study was to determine readmission risk factors after a neurovascular incident to guide APRNs in the primary care setting. The study is a retrospective observational study that used a crude single predictor model to determine potential risks for readmission. A total of 876 neurovascular participants were studied. Of these, only 317 experienced at least one hospital readmission, with 703 readmissions within 1 year, indicating some were readmitted more than once. Risks for readmission varied across neurovascular events. The main reasons for readmission were because of neurological, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal complications. Stroke readmission rates are high and require intervention by APRNs. To prevent readmission includes timely follow-up within 30 days and should also include longitudinal follow-up beyond 90 days to prevent hospital readmission. Future studies are needed to create guidelines for APRNs that implement rehabilitation strategies to decrease hospital readmission for the neurovascular population that focus on interdisciplinary communication.

An open book: A virtual book club designed to connect advanced practice registered nurses through quality improvement.

A virtual book club (VBC) was created for advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to foster engagement, connect with peers, and apply readings to their personal and professional development. Microsoft Teams virtual platform was used. Books chosen focused on professional development and health care-related topics. As a quality-improvement project, 60 participants completed an anonymous Likert-scale survey about their perception of the VBC. Respondents survey completion rate was 71%. Sixty survey evaluations stated that they agreed or strongly agreed (mean 4.78-4.82/5) that the VBC encourages peer engagement, professional applicability, intention to read professional books, and willingness to invite peers to future VBCs. Participants were neutral (mean 3.25/5) about reading professional or health care-related books outside of the VBC. Virtual book clubs offer opportunities for APRNs to socially connect with peers and apply readings to both their personal and professional development. The results from this project may be applied to help encourage connection with other APRNs during these times of provider burnout.

Advanced practice nurse pharmacogenomics capacity and utilization.

Guided by Clinical Pharmacogenomic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for >140 medications, pharmacogenomic tests inform medication selection and dosing to optimize efficacy while minimizing toxicities. This study assessed pharmacogenomic self-reported curricular content, knowledge, skills, attitudes, and usage in advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) with prescriptive privileges. An online survey was administered assessing pharmacogenomic curricular content, knowledge, skills, attitudes, and usage. Data from 266 APRNs were analyzed. Most graduated with their highest nursing degree ∼10 years ago and reported pharmacogenomic curricular content ( n = 124, 48%). Pharmacogenomic curricular content was associated with pharmacogenomic familiarity ( p = .045) but not with knowledge confidence ( p = .615). Pharmacogenomic usage, defined as ordering a pharmacogenomic test within the past year, was low ( n = 76, 29%) and most ( n = 210, 84%) reported never using CPIC Guidelines. Advanced practice registered nurses ( n = 162) who did not anticipate ordering a pharmacogenomic test in the next year ( n = 77, 48%) indicated that they did not know what test to order. Deficits were identified in APRN pharmacogenomic knowledge and skills despite academic training. Most reported not ordering pharmacogenomic tests, did not know what test to order, and did not use CPIC guidelines. Pharmacogenomics is a quality and safety issue. Academic training did not result in practice integration and most reported capacity deficits. Recommendation for overcoming academic deficits include: (1) assessment of pharmacogenomics curricular content and faculty teaching capacity; (2) training addressing identified deficiencies; and (3) Commission of Collegiate Nursing Education policies that include pharmacogenomics in advanced pharmacology. Practicing APRN plans include on-the-job training and/or mandatory training at the time of relicensure.

Improving Diabetic Care Through Education and Innovation.

Background: Despite the innovative advancements in diabetes care, providers may not recognize patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who qualify for a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device or the benefits of a telemedicine program for improving self-management behaviors. Objective: This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to determine if an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN)-led telemedicine program using CGM could improve glycemic control and self-management in patients with insulin-dependent T2DM. Methods: A 6-week telemedicine program was developed and implemented using the CGM's time-in-range to deliver patient-specific education. Clinical metrics were collected at each visit. All patients completed a pre- and postintervention Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire-Revised (DSMQ-R) survey. Results: A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that the telemedicine program had a statistically significant impact on time-in-range outcomes, F(2, 14) = 18.203, p < .001. Paired-samples t tests indicate that APRN-led education improved body mass index, t(8) = 4.232, p = .002; decreased systolic blood pressure, t(8) = 2.90, p = .010, and diastolic blood pressure, t(8) = 3.21, p = .007; and increased self-management skills as evidenced by DSMQ-R, t(8) = -5.498, p < .001. Conclusions: This QI project highlights multiple interventions for improving diabetes management in a primary care facility. Implications for Nursing: An APRN-led telemedicine program integrating CGM time-in-range data can improve glycemic control and self-management skills in patients with T2DM who administer insulin.

Sustainable Academic-Clinical Alliance: A Model to Improve Academic-Practice Partnerships.

Background: National nurse shortages, ongoing nurse faculty retirements, and a dearth of clinical sites make it challenging to prepare advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) who are ready to transition into independent provider roles, especially in acute care settings. One of the most effective ways to address these experiential learning challenges is for academic institutions and healthcare systems to form collaborative academic-practice partnerships. However, many partnerships between schools of nursing and healthcare institutions have found numerous challenges, including time to devote to the partnership, funding of ideas, competing initiatives and needs, and sustainability. Objective: The University of Maryland School of Nursing (UMSON) set out to expand the traditional academic-clinical partnership approach with a new collaborative model. Methods: Rather than both parties coming to the table with their own goals, the partnership focused on intentional relationship building, transparency, measurable outcomes, and sustainability. This model, further called the Sustainable Academic-Clinical Alliance (SACA), assures that both sides of the partnership benefit. The SACA model was used to create an academic-practice partnership with the University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System in order to increase APRN clinical practice sites and readiness of APRN students to provide care across the continuum in the state of Maryland. Results: Since July 2016, the SACA model has enabled over 40 clinical providers in over 20 different clinical areas to offer 329 different clinical and nonclinical experiences to APRN students from UMSON. At the end of the 5-year alliance, 150 unique UMSON APRN students completed 257 different clinical rotations. Conclusion: The SACA model effectively promotes the development and achievement of sustainable academic-practice partnerships by focusing on (a) intentional relationship building, (b) transparency in goal setting and alliance maintenance, (c) development of outcome measures, and (d) sustainability. Implications for Nursing: The components of the SACA model made sustainability more achievable, which has eluded previous academic-clinical partnerships. This model can serve as a blueprint for other academic and healthcare institutions to establish sustainable academic-practice partnerships.

Designing a Mentorship Program for APRNs in Specialty Palliative Care Practice.

As advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) enter practice, support is crucial for success. Formal mentorship has been shown to improve employee turnover, job satisfaction, and clinical competence. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, an APRN team specializing in palliative care experienced an unprecedented rate of staff turnover. As a result, the team decided to create a formal mentorship program to support newly hired colleagues and assist their transition to practice. A subcommittee of APRNs within the palliative care practice met to establish a mentorship practice framework, expectations for the program, and a methodology for matching mentors and mentees. The mentorship program was implemented with two cohorts comprising a total of five mentors and six mentees. It was evaluated by participants using surveys asking open-ended, qualitative questions. Both mentors and mentees reported finding the program valuable. Mentees felt the program helped their transition to practice, created a forum for peer support, and improved their clinical competence. Mentors said the program furthered their own professional development, advanced their clinical growth, and fostered a connection to colleagues. Employee engagement and alignment improved, and staff turnover decreased. Further work is needed to improve on the program framework and analyze the outcomes of mentorship.

Sociodemographic Disparity Patterns of Perceived Stress and Resilience Among Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioners During the Prolonged COVID-19 Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 1 of the most prolonged and extensive global pandemics in history, ravaged the world. Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) played crucial roles as frontline health care providers in detecting and treating COVID-19–infected patients. The purpose of this study was to provide updated knowledge and sociodemographic disparity patterns in APRNs’ perceived stress and resilience during the prolonged pandemic period. A total of 2,412 APRNs completed the surveys. The results of this research showed that APRNs’ stress and resilience were significantly impacted by the prolonged pandemic. Significant sociodemographic disparity patterns of perceived stress and resilience among APRNs were also clearly identified.

Intensive Primary Care Nursing: Exploring the Impact of a Nurse-Led Model for Medically and Social Complex Patients.

Lack of access to primary care contributes to health inequities. Treatment settings that utilize the full experience and training of nurses, both registered nurses (RNs) and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), can expand in primary care and successfully address health inequities. This small study describes the implementation of a model of primary care called intensive primary care (IPC), which has eight elements that support the full utilization of a nurse's experience and training. This is a mixed method qualitative study, which reports the observations of the implementation and pre- and post-intervention measures. The IPC model was implemented at a free clinic, which targeted underserved population between 2020 and 2023. Participants were selected as a convenience sample. Participants were to have two or more chronic health problems The participants received primary care using the IPC model, which included setting self-management goals, and meeting with RN or APRN on a monthly basis (face to face, via phone or zoom) to monitor progress toward goals. Twenty-two people were approached, and 19 completed the intervention. Pre- and Post-intervention measures (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care [PACIC]-20); Functional, Communicative, Critical Thinking Health Literacy; Perceived Stress; Patient Activation; Perceived Self Efficacy for Chronic Disease; EuroQo- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D); Trust in Provider; Emotional Support-Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS); and Patient Health Questionnaire-9) were obtained and analyzed with paired T test (α < .05). Nurses involved meet weekly to share observations recorded in free form notes. These observations were summarized by two of the authors (MD and KF) at the end of the study. All patients had improved physical health outcomes, but more importantly, there were significant improvements in measures known to impact health and health outcomes, specifically, patient activation, self-efficacy for chronic illness, PACIC, and trust in provider. Time spent with patients, both duration and frequency of contact, was observed to have significant impacts.

Reflecting on diagnosis: The Metacognitive Diagnostic Reasoning Model©.

Diagnostic reasoning is a complex cognitive process that requires intuitive, heuristic processing from knowledge and experience, as well as deliberate and reflective thinking. Evidence on interventions to improve diagnostic reasoning is inconsistent, in part because different terms and models are used to guide research. To present a model of the factors of diagnostic reasoning in Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), based on a review of the literature supporting the Metacognitive Diagnostic Reasoning (MDR) Model©. A review of the literature through systematic database search, historical articles, texts, and documents was conducted from inception through August 2023 (N = 41). The MDR model depicts the following concepts: (1) metacognition is viewed as the driving force of diagnostic reasoning; (2) dual cognitive processing and knowledge representations are used; (3) once a diagnosis, treatment plan, and evaluation are complete, APRNs use metacognition for the next patient encounter, using repetition for improvement of the process. The model combines key concepts of diagnostic reasoning, providing a framework for researchers to develop and test, and faculty to teach and evaluate this complex process in learners. The MDR model provides research opportunities to validate its usefulness and effectiveness and a framework to guide educational research, contributing to the body of evidence-based practice in nursing. In addition, it may foster ongoing education and training that could lead to more accurate diagnoses and treatment plans, ultimately improving patient care by reducing diagnostic errors.

Utilization and Timing of Cystoscopy for Hematuria Evaluation by Advanced Practice Providers and Urologists

ObjectiveTo characterize differences between urologists and advanced practice providers (APPs) in utilization of cystoscopy for hematuria. MethodsWe identified patients initially evaluated for hematuria by a urologist or urology APP between 2015 and 2020 in the MarketScan® Research Databases. We determined whether they received a cystoscopy within six months of their urology visit and the number of days until cystoscopy. We used multivariable regression to analyze the association between these outcomes and whether the urology clinician was an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN), physician assistant (PA), or urologist. ResultsWe identified 34,470 patients with microscopic hematuria and 17,328 patients with gross hematuria. Patients evaluated by urologists more often received a same-day cystoscopy than those evaluated by APPs (13% vs 5.8%). The odds that patients evaluated for microscopic and gross hematuria received a cystoscopy were 46.2% and 26.2% lower, respectively, if they were evaluated by an APRN versus a urologist. Patients seeing an APRN for microscopic and gross hematuria also waited approximately 7 and 14 days longer for their cystoscopy, respectively. No differences were observed for patients evaluated by PAs versus urologists. ConclusionPatients evaluated for hematuria by an APRN were less likely to receive a cystoscopy and had a longer wait until the procedure compared to those evaluated by a urologist; however, no differences were observed between PAs and urologists. Better understanding APP integration into urology clinics is warranted.