Advance Care Planning Documentation Research Articles

A Personalized and Interactive Web-Based Advance Care Planning Intervention for Older Adults (Koda Health): Pilot Feasibility Study

Abstract Background Advance care planning (ACP) is a process that involves patients expressing their personal goals, values, and future medical care preferences. Digital applications may help facilitate this process, though their use in older adults has not been adequately studied. Objective This pilot study aimed to evaluate the reach, adoption, and usability of Koda Health, a web-based patient-facing ACP platform, among older adults. Methods Older adults (aged 50 years and older) who had an active Epic MyChart account at an academic health care system in North Carolina were recruited to participate. A total of 2850 electronic invitations were sent through MyChart accounts with an embedded hyperlink to the Koda platform. Participants who agreed to participate were asked to complete pre- and posttest surveys before and after navigating through the Koda Health platform. Primary outcomes were reach, adoption, and System Usability Scale (SUS) scores. Exploratory outcomes included ACP knowledge and readiness. Results A total of 161 participants enrolled in the study and created an account on the platform (age: mean 63, SD 9.3 years), with 80% (129/161) of these participants going on to complete all steps of the intervention, thereby generating an advance directive. Participants reported minimal difficulty in using the Koda platform, with an overall SUS score of 76.2. Additionally, knowledge of ACP (eg, mean increase from 3.2 to 4.2 on 5-point scale; P<.001) and readiness (eg, mean increase from 2.6 to 3.2 on readiness to discuss ACP with health care provider; P<.001) significantly increased from before to after the intervention. Conclusions This study demonstrated that the Koda Health platform is feasible, had above-average usability, and improved ACP documentation of preferences in older adults. Our findings indicate that web-based health tools like Koda may help older individuals learn about and feel more comfortable with ACP while potentially facilitating greater engagement in care planning.

Systems for electronic documentation and sharing of advance care planning preferences: a scoping review

Digital approaches to support advance care planning (ACP) documentation and sharing are increasingly being used, with a lack of research to characterise their design, content, and use. This study aimed to characterise how digital approaches are being used to support ACP documentation and sharing internationally. A scoping review was performed in accordance with the JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) guidelines and the PRISMA 2020 checklist, prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/xnrg3). MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ACM Digital, IEEE Xplore and CINAHL were searched in February 2023. Only publications in English, published from 2008 onwards were considered. Eligibility criteria included a focus on ACP and electronic systems. Out of 2,393 records, 34 reports were included, predominantly from the USA (76.5%). ACP documentation is typically stored in electronic health records (EHRs) (67.6%), with a third (32.4%) enabling limited patient access. Non-standard approaches (n = 15;44.1%) were the commonest study design of included reports, with outcome measures focusing on the influence of systems on the documentation (i.e. creation, quantity, quality, frequency or timing) of ACP information (n = 23;67.6%). Digital approaches to support ACP are being implemented and researched internationally with an evidence base dominated by non-standard study designs. Future research is needed to extend outcome measurement to consider aspects of care quality and explore whether the content of existing systems aligns with aspects of care that are valued by patients.

Participation in Advance Care Planning Among Medically At-Risk Rural Veterans: Protocol for a Personalized Engagement Model.

Many of the challenges in advanced care planning (ACP) conversations are linked to the waxing and waning progress of serious illnesses. Conversations with patients about future medical care decisions by a surrogate decision maker have historically been left until late in the patient's disease trajectory. These conversations often happen at a time when the patient is already very ill. The challenge in effective early ACP and serious illness conversations is to create a situation where patients appreciate the link between current and future medical care. Setting the stage to make these conversations more accessible includes using telehealth to have conversations at the patient's place of choice. The personalization used includes addressing the current medical and social needs of the patient and ensuring that expressed needs are addressed as much as possible. Engaging patients in these conversations allows the documentation of patient preferences in the electronic health record (EHR), providing guidelines for future medical care. The objective of our telehealth serious illness care conversations program was to successfully recruit patients who lacked up-to-date documentation of ACP in their EHR. Once these patients were identified, we engaged in meaningful, structured conversations to address the veterans' current needs and concerns. We developed a recruitment protocol that increased the uptake of rural veterans' participation in serious illness care conversations and subsequent EHR documentation. The recruitment protocol outlined herein used administrative data to determine those patients who have not completed or updated formal ACP documentation in the EHR and who are at above-average risk for death in the next 3-5 years. The key features of the telehealth serious illness care conversations recruitment protocol involve tailoring the recruitment approach to address current patient concerns while emphasizing future medical decision-making. As of September 2022, 196 veterans had completed this intervention. The recruitment method ensures that the timing of the intervention is patient driven, allowing for veterans to engage in ACP at a time and place convenient for them and their identified support persons. The recruitment protocol has been successful in actively involving patients in ACP conversations, leading to an uptick in completed formal documentation of ACP preferences within the EHR for this specific population. This documentation is then available to the medical team to guide future medical care. RR1-10.2196/55080.

Advance Care Planning Documentation in High-grade Glioma (P5-6.010)

Advance Care Planning Documentation in High-grade Glioma (P5-6.010)

Implementation and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) in acute care.

The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) has been used to identify patients at risk of deteriorating and dying within 1 year. Early identification and integration of advance care planning (ACP) provides the opportunity for a better quality of life for patients. The aims of this study were to identify the number of patients who were SPICT™ positive; their mortality rates at 6 and 12 months of the SPICT™ assessment; and level of adherence to ACP documentation. A retrospective audit of the Supportive and Palliative Care database was conducted at an acute aged care precinct in a major metropolitan tertiary referral hospital in New South Wales, Australia. Data comprising demographics, clinical conditions, SPICT™ positivity and compliance with ACP documentation were collected. SPICT™-positive patients and mortality were tracked at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Data from 153 patients were collected. The mean age of the patients was 84.1 (±7.8) years, and the length of hospital stay was 10 (±24.7) (range 1-269) days. Approximately 37% were from residential care, and 80% had family deciding on their care. About 15% died during hospitalisation, and 48% were discharged to a care facility. The ACP documentation showed various levels of completion. Mortality rates at 6 and 12 months were 36% and 39%, respectively. Most patients (99%) were SPICT™-positive, with indicators correlating with higher mortality rates at both follow-ups. The study emphasises the critical need for addressing ACP and palliative care among older patients with life-limiting conditions. It underscores the importance of timely discussions, documentation, and cessation of futile interventions.

Factors Associated With Hospital Admission in the Last Month: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

ContextDriven by concerns about care quality, patient experience, and national metrics, health systems are increasingly focusing on identifying risk factors for patients who are hospitalized in the last month of life. ObjectiveTo evaluate patient factors associated with hospital admission in the last month (30 days). MethodsWe analyzed a retrospective cohort of 8488 patients with a primary care visit in a tertiary health system in the last year of life using a linked electronic health record and decedent dataset. We examined healthcare utilization (primary care, emergency, hospital, intensive care unit encounters) and end-of-life related outcomes (palliative care consultation, do-not-resuscitate orders, advance care planning documentation, hospice at hospital discharge, death in health system). Multivariable logistic regressions identified patient factors associated with admission in the last month. ResultsAbout 2202 (25.9%) patients had a hospital admission in the last month. Among the 1282 (15.1%) who died in a health system facility, most (1103/1282, 86.0%) were admitted to the hospital in the last month. Among patients with a hospital admission and discharged in the last month, 60.9% (686/1126) were discharged on hospice. Compared to those without these diseases, metastatic cancer, liver disease, or heart failure had the highest odds of admission in the last month (adjusted OR 2.36 95%CI 2.05–2.72; 2.28, 95%CI 1.98–2.62; and 2.17 95%CI 1.93–2.45 respectively). ConclusionsAs patients with heart or liver disease or metastatic cancer had the highest odds of admission in the last month, collaborative interventions between primary, palliative, and specialty care may improve quality of care at the end of life.

A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Interventions to Increase Advance Care Planning.

Although interventions can increase advance care planning (ACP) engagement, it remains unclear which interventions to choose in primary care settings. This study compares a passive intervention (mailed materials) to an interactive intervention (group visits) on participant ACP engagement and experiences. We used mixed methods to examine ACP engagement at baseline and six months following two ACP interventions. Eligible patients were randomized to receive mailed materials or participate in two ACP group visits. We administered the 4-item ACP Engagement survey (n = 110) and conducted interviews (n = 23). We compared mean scores and percent change in ACP engagement, analyzed interviews with directed content analysis to understand participants' ACP experiences, and integrated the findings based on mailed materials or group visits intervention. All participants demonstrated increased ACP engagement scores. At six months, group visit participants reported higher percent change in mean overall score compared with mailed materials participants (+8% vs +3%, P < .0001). Group visits participants reported that being prompted to think about end-of-life preferences, gaining knowledge about ACP, and understanding the value of completing ACP documentation influenced their ACP readiness. While both interventions encouraged patients to start considering and refining their end-of-life preferences, group visits made patients feel more knowledgeable about ACP, highlighted the importance of completing ACP documentation early, and sparked further ACP discussions with others. While primary care patients may benefit from mailed ACP materials, patients reported increased readiness after ACP group visits. Group visits emphasized the value of upstream preparation, ongoing conversations, and increased knowledge about ACP.

Improve Advance Care Planning: A Brief Report Discussing Goals of Care Interventions to Improve Communication Among Health Care Teams and Patients Maximizing the Use of the Electronic Health Record Tools.

Introduction: A key element of advance care planning (ACP) is the goals of care (GOC) conversation between the provider and the patient. The value of meaningful GOC conversations for the patient, provider, and health care institution is well documented. However, if the GOC documentation is buried in the medical record, not well defined, or poorly documented, that value is squandered. The Improvement Process: Interventions were implemented with oncology physicians and nurse practitioners (NPs). These included education, system reform including improving the ease and consistency of documentation of ACP, and regular feedback. Results: Participants reported increased confidence in communication skills about GOC conversations postworkshops. Data results for the tracked metrics, health care power of attorney, code status, and GOC, all showed improvement. Conclusion: Physicians and NPs recognized the importance of GOC conversations as part of ACP. Considerable progress was made by focusing on GOC conversations, maximizing information technology, participating in coaching, and ongoing data monitoring.

Feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning in outpatient clinics: A qualitative study of health-care professionals experience.

This study sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a facilitated advance care planning (ACP) intervention implemented in outpatient clinics, as perceived by health-care professionals (HCPs). Data from seven focus groups (n = 27) and nine semi-structured interviews with HCPs recruited as part of a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (RCT) were analysed using qualitative descriptive methodology. Components of the intervention included HCP education and training, tools to assist HCPs with patient selection, hardcopy information, and ACP documentation, and specialised nurse-facilitators to support HCPs to complete ACP conversations and documentation with patients and caregivers. Health-care professionals working in tertiary outpatient clinics perceived the facilitated ACP intervention as feasible and acceptable. Health-care professionals reported a high level of satisfaction with key elements of the intervention, including the specialised education and training, screening and assessment procedures and ongoing support from the nurse-facilitators. Health-care professionals reported this training and support increased their confidence and ACP knowledge, leading to more frequent ACP discussions with patients and their families. Health-care professionals noted their ability to conduct ACP screening and assessment in clinic was impeded by large clinical caseloads and patient-related factors (e.g., dementia diagnoses, and emotional distress). Additional barriers to ACP implementation identified by HCPs included poor collaboration, constrained time and clinical space, undefined roles and standardised recording procedures for HCPs. Facilitated ACP intervention in outpatient clinics is perceived by HCPs as feasible and acceptable. Addressing barriers and tailoring implementation strategies may improve the delivery of ACP as part of tertiary outpatient care.

The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on the Presence of Advance Care Planning Documents in Patients With Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Patients presenting with spinal cord injury (SCI) often times have notable deficits or polytrauma and may require urgent decision making for early management. However, their presentation may affect decision-making ability. Although advance care planning (ACP) may help guide spine surgeons as to patient preferences, the rate at which they are available and disparities in ACP completion are still not understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate disparities in the completion of ACP among patients with acute SCI. All patients presenting with cervical SCI to the emergency department at an urban, tertiary level I trauma center from 2010 to 2021 were identified from a prospective database of all consults evaluated by the spine service. Each patient's medical record was reviewed to assess for the presence of ACP documents such as living will, power of attorney, or advance directive. Community-level socioeconomic status was assessed using the Distressed Communities Index. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed. We identified 424 patients: 104 (24.5%) of whom had ACP. Patients with ACP were older (64.8 versus 56.5 years, P = 0.001), more likely White (78.8% versus 71.9%, P = 0.057), and present with ASIA Impairment Scale grade A SCI (21.2% versus 12.8%, P = 0.054), although the latter two did not reach statistical significance. On multivariable logistic regression, patients residing in at-risk communities were significantly less likely to have ACP documents compared with those in prosperous communities (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29, P = 0.03). Although patients living in distressed communities were less likely to complete ACP compared with those in prosperous communities (OR 0.50, P = 0.066), this did not meet statistical significance. Female patients were also less likely to have ACP (OR: 0.43, P = 0.005). Female patients and those from at-risk communities are markedly less likely to complete ACP. Attention to possible disparities during admission and ACP discussions may help ensure that patients of all backgrounds have treatment goals documented.

The impact of a multidisciplinary goals-of-care program on unplanned readmission rates at a comprehensive cancer center.

This study examined the 30-day unplanned readmission rate in the medical oncology population before and after the implementation of an institution-wide multicomponent interdisciplinary goals of care (myGOC) program. This retrospective study compared the 30-day unplanned readmission rates in consecutive medical patients during the pre-implementation period (May 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019) and the post-implementation period (May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020). Secondary outcomes included 7-day unplanned readmission rates, inpatient do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, and palliative care consults. We randomly selected a hospitalization encounter for each unique patient during each study period for statistical analysis. A multivariate analysis model was used to examine the association between 30-day unplanned readmission rates and implementation of the myGOC program. There were 7028 and 5982 unique medical patients during the pre- and post-implementation period, respectively. The overall 30-day unplanned readmission rate decreased from 24.0 to 21.3% after implementation of the myGOC program. After adjusting for covariates, the myGOC program implementation remained significantly associated with a reduction in 30-day unplanned readmission rates (OR [95% CI] 0.85 [0.77, 0.95], p = 0.003). Other factors significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of a 30-day unplanned readmission were an inpatient DNR order, advanced care planning documentation, and an emergent admission type. We also observed a significant decrease in 7-day unplanned readmission rates (OR [95% CI] 0.75 [0.64, 0.89]) after implementation of the myGOC program. The 30-day and 7-day unplanned readmission rates decreased in our hospital after implementation of a system-wide multicomponent GOC intervention.

PRAGMATIC IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ADVANCE CARE PLANNING INITIATIVE: MOVING KNOWLEDGE INTO ACTION

Abstract Primary care is an important setting for patient and family-centered communication with older adults given the high frequency of interactions, longitudinal trusted relationships, and patient preferences for advance care planning (ACP). Increasing ACP conversations and documentation of advance directives in primary care is a focus of quality-of-care initiatives and is particularly relevant for older adults, including those with dementia. The SHARING Choices ACP program evaluation was designed to examine the fidelity of implementation with the two partner health systems. SHARING Choices includes a mailing (introductory letter, an agenda-setting checklist, a blank advance directive, and information about shared-portal access for family) sent two weeks prior to scheduled primary care visits for patients aged 65 and above along with access to an ACP facilitator in each practice. Embedding SHARING Choices within primary care practices involved a multi-step process, including onboarding of health system partners, facilitator identification and training, tailored onboarding, practice champion engagement, and practice orientation and ongoing support. Of 23,220 candidate patients, 17,931 outreach attempts by phone (77.9%) and the patient portal (22.1%) were made by ACP facilitators and 645 conversations occurred. Most conversations (94.8%) were less than 45 minutes in duration. Study findings reinforce the value of adaptable study design; co-designing workflow adaptations with frontline staff; adapting implementation processes to fit the operational and organizational priorities of the health system.

Across race, ethnicity, and language: An intervention to improve advance care planning documentation unmasks health disparities.

Racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to have advance directives and living wills, despite the importance of advancedcare planning (ACP) in end-of-life care. We aimed to understand the impact of an intervention to improve ACP documentation across race, ethnicity, and language on hospitalized patients at our institution. We launched an intervention to improve the rates of ACP documentation for hospitalized patients aged >75 or with advanced illness defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. We analyzed ACP completion rates, preintervention, and intervention, and used interrupted time-seriesanalyses to measure the differential impact of the intervention across race, ethnicity, and language. A total of 10,220 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall rates of ACP documentation improved from 13.9% to 43.7% in the intervention period, with a 2.47% monthly increase in ACP documentation compared to baseline (p < .001). During the intervention period, the rate of ACP documentation increased by 2.72% per month for non-Hispanic White patients (p < .001), by 1.84% per month for Latinx patients (p < .001),and by 1.9% per month for Black patients (p < .001). Differences in the intervention trends between non-Hispanic White and Latinx patients (p = .04) and Black patients (p = .04) were significant. An intervention designed to improve ACP documentation in hospitalized patients widened a disparity across race and ethnicity with Latinx and Black patients having lower rates of improvement. Our findings reinforce the need to measure the impact of quality improvement interventions on existing health disparities and to implement specific strategies to prevent worsening disparities.

Improving Advance Care Planning for Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure.

Advance care planning (ACP) is a valuable and proven approach for enhancing end-of-life communication and quality of life for individuals with heart failure (HF) and their family members. However, the adoption of ACP in practice is still lower than desired. According to University of California, Irvine Medical Center HF metrics, only 15.3% of hospitalized HF patients had completed ACP documentation before discharge, as recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). This quality improvement project aimed to investigate whether the rate of ACP completion could be increased by utilizing EMR reminders to health care teams regarding individual patients. Personalized reminders were sent to providers for each hospitalized patient diagnosed with HF, who did not have existing ACP documentation in the EMR, to encourage completion of ACP documentation. Our findings have shown that, during the three-month intervention period, the average ACP completion rate was 21.0%. This represents a 5.7% absolute increase in ACP completion compared to the six months before our intervention (15.3%); a relative increase of 37.3%. Direct message reminders to providers prove to be an effective method for enhancing ACP completion among this specific patient group.

Empowering nurses to increase engagement in advance care planning in a medicine transitional care unit: a best practice implementation project.

Advance care planning (ACP) communication and documentation are often inadequate, leading to care that is inconsistent with patients' preferences and moral dilemmas for family members. Nurses are patient advocates optimally positioned to initiate ACP but many feel that they lack the training and skills to navigate these conversations. The objective of this project was to increase nurses' capacity to engage in ACP. This project used the JBI audit and feedback method to implement evidence into practice. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit tools were used to incorporate ACP into nursing workflow. Eight audit criteria were created based on a JBI evidence summary. Compliance was measured by reviewing ACP notes from electronic health records and online survey responses. A baseline audit was followed by educational presentations and development of posted materials. Three follow-up audits examined sustainability. Compliance with the best practice recommendation for nurses to engage in ACP discussions increased from 55% to 80%. There was improvement from zero ACP notes at baseline (0% compliance) to 12 ACP notes in the final audit. Of these notes, 42% included all best practice elements and 92% included patients' treatment preferences. Development of an integrative nursing education plan for ACP empowers nurses to engage in vital conversations. Informing nurses of their scope of practice, defining terms and expectations, and encouraging them to attempt and document conversations will benefit patients. Future initiatives would benefit from incorporating practical opportunities without real-life implications and providing continued support to cohorts.

Reach of Palliative Care for Parkinson Disease: Results From a Large National Survey of Patients and Care Partners.

People with Parkinson disease (PWP) and their care partners have high palliative care needs resulting from disabling motor and nonmotor symptoms. There is growing support for palliative care (PC) approaches to Parkinson disease. However, little is known regarding the extent to which the palliative needs of PWP and care partners are currently being met. This study's primary objective is to describe PWP's and care partners' perceptions of the extent to which their PC needs are being met. Secondary objectives are to describe their perceptions of the quality of clinical communication and their knowledge of PC. PWPs and care partners (n = 12,995) who had consented to receiving surveys from the Parkinson's Foundation were emailed an electronic survey. PC was operationalized as comprising 5 key components: systematic assessment and management of (1) nonmotor symptoms, (2) PWPs' emotional and spiritual needs, (3) care partners' needs, (4) the completion of annual advance care planning, and (5) timely referrals to specialist palliative care and hospice when appropriate. A total 1,882 individuals (1,266 PWP and 616 care partners) responded to the survey (response rate 14.5%). Few PWP (22%) reported that their neurologists never asked regarding bothersome nonmotor symptoms or did so or only if they brought it up. Fifty percent of PWP reported that pain as a specific nonmotor symptom was never managed or managed only if they brought it up. Similarly, PWPs' emotional and spiritual needs (55%), care partners' well-being (57%), and completion of advance care planning documentation (79%) were never addressed or only addressed if PWP brought it up. The quality of clinical communication was generally rated as open and honest (64% PWP). Fewer PWP (30%) reported that doctors helped them deal with the uncertainties of Parkinson disease. Most PWP (85%) reported being knowledgeable regarding PC, and 68% reported that the goal of PC was to help friends and family cope with the illness. Although some elements of PC are currently being addressed in routine care for PWP, there are many gaps and opportunities for improvement. These data may facilitate focused attention and development of resources to improve the quality and availability of PC for Parkinson disease.

Forms or Free-Text? Measuring Advance Care Planning Activity Using Electronic Health Records.

Advance care planning (ACP) discussions seek to guide future serious illness care. These discussions may be recorded in the electronic health record by documentation in clinical notes, structured forms and directives, and physician orders. Yet, most studies of ACP prevalence have only examined structured electronic health record elements and ignored data existing in notes. We sought to investigate the relative comprehensiveness and accuracy of ACP documentation from structured and unstructured electronic health record data sources. We evaluated structured and unstructured ACP documentation present in the electronic health records of 435 patients with cancer drawn from three separate healthcare systems. We extracted structured ACP documentation by manually annotating written documents and forms scanned into the electronic health record. We coded unstructured ACP documentation using a rule-based natural language processing software that identified ACP keywords within clinical notes and was subsequently reviewed for accuracy. The unstructured approach identified more instances of ACP documentation (238, 54.7% of patients) than the structured ACP approach (187, 42.9% of patients). Additionally, 16.6% of all patients with structured ACP documentation only had documents that were judged as misclassified, incomplete, blank, unavailable, or a duplicate of a previously entered erroneous document. ACP documents scanned into electronic health records represent a limited view of ACP activity. Research and measures of clinical practice with ACP should incorporate information from unstructured data.

Characteristics of patients utilizing general inpatient (GIP) hospice.

236 Background: GIP hospice acute care is an inpatient designation for patients (pts) with terminal illness and clinical need to manage uncontrolled symptoms that cannot be managed in other settings. We recently revised hospital workflows to streamline GIP enrollment when appropriate. This study investigates the GIP utilization patterns and characteristics of pts with cancer on GIP. Methods: In December 2022, in collaboration with a consulting hospice program, we revised hospital workflows to improve access to and increase provider and pt awareness about GIP hospice for eligible pts at our academic cancer center. In this study, we review the use of GIP services in hospitalized pts with cancer since the revised workflow. We investigate pt demographics, care utilization (chemotherapy use, hospital readmission) and advanced care planning (ACP) documentation. All data presented are descriptive. Results: A total of 44 pts with cancer enrolled in GIP hospice between 12/2022 and 5/2023 after workflow optimization. This rose from 9 pts in the preceding 6 months prior to revised workflow. Median age was 67 years (range 29-90); 57% were male; 41% were White, 34% were Asian, 5% were Black, and 18% were Other Race; 18% had a hematologic malignancy, and all other pts (82%) had metastatic solid tumors (gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and thoracic diseases most prevalent). 82% listed English as the primary language, and 11% needed an interpreter. 48% had Medicare, 16% had Medicaid, and 36% had private insurance. 98% of the pts had uncontrolled pain as the predominant symptom necessitating inpatient hospice. Among enrolled pts, 98% died on GIP, with a median length of stay preceding GIP of 11.5 days and 2 days on GIP. 39% of pts transitioned to GIP during their first hospitalization within 90 days of death, while 52% had hospital readmissions with a median of 2 admissions in the 90 days prior to death. 18% (8/44) received chemotherapy within 30 days of death (38% [n=3] with curative intent). Notably, the median length of time pts had been followed by their outpatient oncologist was 22 months, and only 18% had fewer than 3 months history at our cancer center. 48% utilized outpatient palliative care prior to death. ACP documentation was completed for 61% of pts (45% with documented prognosis), though only 27% had any documentation by their primary oncologist. Conclusions: Our pilot to identify pts eligible for GIP who could benefit from this care at end of life was successful in increasing utilization of this service. Most pts dying in the hospital on GIP had metastatic solid tumors, with two hospitalizations in the months prior to death. Most pts also had a well-established relationship in the oncology clinic but still had no prior utilization of hospice and only benefitted from a median of 2 days on GIP hospice prior to death. Additional data is needed to understand perspectives and barriers to utilization of outpatient hospice and palliative care resources.

Spiritual care support of goal concordant care in the oncologic emergency setting.

274 Background: Many patients admitted through emergency departments are near the end of life. Patients who have previously indicated that they do not wish for advanced resuscitation efforts are often admitted to the hospital with a presumption of full code status. Documentation of goals of care discussions (GOC) increases the likelihood of receiving goal concordant care during the ensuing hospitalization. In the fast-paced environment of emergency care, physicians often hesitate to introduce these critical conversations. Healthcare has evolved beyond the physician–patient dyad, it includes a variety of professions. A multi-disciplinary team including physicians, nursing, social work, and spiritual care providers (SCPs) was established to improve compliance of documenting goals of care. Methods: This quality improvement project was initiated in the institution's Acute Cancer Care Center. SCPs, a previously underutilized resource, were enlisted to assist in GOC discussions and advance care planning (ACP) documentation on patients who had previously elected do not resuscitate/do not intubate (DNR/DNI) status. The goal was to increase ACP documentation for these patients by 50% over baseline. The project employed a Plan-Do-Study-Act technique. Patients who had a history of DNR/DNI were automatically identified upon arrival to emergency care based on any of 4 criteria extracted from the electronic medical record: 1) History of DNR order within the past year; 2) advance care plan notes documenting the patient is not “full code”; 3) out of hospital DNR; and 4) previous discharge to hospice. Track boards were updated across multiple disciplines (attending physicians, SCPs, nursing and social work) to identify these patients. SCPs rounded on identified patients who were expected to be admitted based on discussions with nurses/attending physicians. They met with patients to provide support while confirming/updating their goals of care. This allowed attending providers to more easily confirm the patient’s wishes and place appropriate documentation/orders. The project took place during May 2023, using April 2023 as baseline data. Results: The goal of a 50% increase in ACP compliance was exceeded. In the month of April, 25 of 131 identified patients had ACP notes. In May 55 of 151 identified patients had ACP documentation. This represents a relative 89% increase in ACP documentation. An increase in DNR orders was also noted (table). Conclusions: SCPs can serve as a resource for establishing and documenting goals of care for patients in the emergency care setting. Collaborating with SCPs can increase compliance with local and national GOC initiatives.[Table: see text]

Implementation of advance care planning quality initiative in community cancer center.

422 Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is an integral part of the journey of a cancer patient. Our goal was to increase awareness, normalize conversations, and improve documentation of Advance Care Planning needs in Oncology Patients. Methods: 2021 Q4: Identified MIPS 047 Advance Care Planning and PIMSH1 Advance Care Planning in Stage 4 disease as an opportunity to improve ACP. Forms updated to include ACP information on New Patient Paperwork, including a Consent to Communicate, which included detailed information on Surrogate Decision Maker designation. Q1: Letter to the patient was added to New Patient Packet with information on Advance Directive (AD) and POLST for all patients. Standardized the use of Oregon Health Authority AD and User Guide, available in multiple languages. Q2: Educated Front Desk staff to include screening for Surrogate Decision Maker. Educated MA team on screening for ACP needs, appropriate documentation in EHR and State POLST Registry, and on appropriate follow up for patients requesting ACP counseling Q3: The US Oncology Network provided a Difficult Conversations Workshop and ACP training with Support Services Team, including Patient Navigation Team and Social Workers. Social Workers provided ACP visits. Q4: Standardized Nurse Navigator visits to include ACP needs and resources at C1D1 education or when referred. 2023: Changes to workflow are on-going and fine tuning occurs with review of metrics and a Continuous Quality Process Improvement plan. Results: See table. Conclusions: MIPS 047 has risen from 42.8% in 2021 to 94.4% 2023 YTD, which includes patients 65 and older that have been screened for ACP needs, have designated a Surrogate Decision Maker, or have a copy of an AD or POLST on file in the EHR. This has increased from 21.8% to 77.6%. Early and often conversations around ACP has markedly increased ACP information and education for a large majority of our patients. This team-based approach has impacted increase in metrics and understanding.[Table: see text]