Advance Care Planning Discussions Research Articles

Improving advance care planning outcomes through social work and provider collaboration.

55 Background: For many patients living with a life-limiting illness, the ability to have authority in their end-of-life (EOL) decision making is a foundational aspect in achieving a peaceful passing. Literature shows, however, that a low percentage of adults in the United States have completed advance directive documents or had discussions indicating their wishes for EOL care. With their unique communication and advocacy skills, licensed masters-prepared social workers (MSWs) are primed to play an active and effective role in Advance Care Planning (ACP) discussions with patients. The purpose of this study aimed to explore the extent to which MSWs in an oncology setting are harnessing these skills. Methods: An online survey was dispersed to social workers working in outpatient oncology clinics in The US Oncology Network. The survey reviewed the level of education, licensure status, involvement and comfort with ACP discussions, and factors that would aid increased engagement of these conversations. Results: 41 out of 75 social workers completed the survey. 95% of respondents were masters prepared (MSW) and licensed at the masters (27%) or clinical (73%) level. Of these MSWs, 95% are having ACP conversations with their patients and loved ones, and 87% are initiating these discussions independently. Although 64% report that they are getting referrals from physicians in their practice, almost half (49%) indicated they would like more support from physicians around ACP conversations with patients. Per respondent comments, a need was expressed for providers to help initiate and normalize ACP discussions. It was also indicated that MSWs do not believe providers fully understand MSWs ability to engage in these discussions. Interestingly, only 10% of MSWs are billing for ACP discussions, yet 46% indicated they would be interested in doing so. Conclusions: Our results indicate there is a gap between the work MSWs are doing in the ACP space and how providers are utilizing the MSW’s clinical expertise in this area. The use of MSWs in a cancer care setting can enhance patient self-determination and documentation of wishes for EOL, as well as support multidisciplinary care of the patient. Additional benefits could include improvement of ACP quality measures, increased revenue, and provider satisfaction in knowing these sensitive conversations are being addressed by a trusted member of the healthcare team.

Anesthesiological Preoperative Interview with a Palliative Care Patient: A Simulation-Based Experiment Using Standardized Patients.

Background and Objectives: Anesthesiologists come into contact with patients under palliative care in different clinical settings. They also routinely encounter these patients in their primary field of work, the operating room. Patients receiving palliative care who are scheduled for surgery will pose unique challenges in perioperative management, often presenting with advanced disease and with different psychosocial and ethical issues. This study aims to evaluate whether anesthesiologists without specialty training in palliative medicine will spot perioperative challenges presented by patients under palliative care and address them adequately. Materials and Methods: In this study, we simulated a preoperative anesthesiological interview using standardized patients and anesthesiologists (specialists as well as trainees). The standardized patients were asked to represent a patient under palliative care in need of surgery because of a mechanical ileus. We conducted 32 interviews, dividing the anesthesiologists into two groups. In one group, the standardized patients were instructed to address four problems, i.e., use of a port catheter for anesthesia, nausea and vomiting, pain medication, and an advance directive including a limitation of treatment (DNR-order). In the other group, these problems were also present, but were not actively addressed by the standardized patients if not asked for. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed. Results: In most cases, the medical problems were spontaneously identified and discussed. In only a few cases, however, was a therapy recommendation made for improved symptom control. The advance directive was spontaneously discussed by only 3 of the 32 (9%) anesthesiologists. In another 16 cases, the advance directive was discussed at the request of the standardized patients. The limitation of treatment stayed in place in all cases, and the discussion of the advance directives remained short, with an average duration of just over 5 min. Conclusions: In this study, the complex problems of patients under palliative care are not sufficiently taken into account in a preoperative anesthesiological interview. To improve treatment of the medical problems, therapists who have palliative medicine expertise, should be involved in the perioperative medical care, ideally as a multi-professional team. The discussion about perioperative limitations of treatment should be held beforehand, for example, as part of a structured advanced care planning discussion.

Preferences for Advance Care Planning in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Nephrology Healthcare Providers in a Tertiary Care Center in India

Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) is essential in managing patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), yet its integration into clinical practice remains limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study explores the preferences, attitudes and perceived barriers of nephrology healthcare providers toward ACP for patients with ESKD in a tertiary care center in India. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among nephrology healthcare providers at a tertiary care center in India. The survey, developed from literature reviews and pretested, covered demographics, ACP knowledge and attitudes, current practices, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Data collection occurred from September 2022 to March 2023. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data through thematic analysis. Results: A total of 50 healthcare providers participated. While 36% acknowledged the importance of ACP, only 8% routinely engaged in ACP discussions. Major barriers included inadequate training (22%), lack of awareness about the importance of discussing ACP among stakeholders (20%), cultural barriers (18%), lack of time (14%), and the absence of institutional protocols for discussion on ACP (14%). Additional barriers included instances where families withhold health information from patients due to fear of losing hope (16%) and patient/family discomfort in discussing ACP (12%). Providers expressed a need for structured ACP protocols and educational programs. Conclusion: Despite recognizing its importance, ACP is underutilized in the care of patients with ESKD in India. Addressing the identified barriers through targeted interventions may enhance ACP practices and improve patient outcomes.

Dyadic advance care planning: systematic review of patient–caregiver interventions and effects

IntroductionFamily caregiver’s involvement in advance care planning (ACP) is essential to provide high-quality end-of-life (EOL) care and to ease the surrogate decision-making burden. However, no systematic review has focused on...

2254 Improving the quality and breadth of advance care planning discussions on gerontology wards in an acute London trust

Abstract Introduction Advance care planning (ACP) offers people the opportunity to plan their future care whilst they have capacity to do so and is supported by national guidance. Decisions regarding future care are more likely to be individualised and holistic when patients and their significant others are involved. This QI project aimed to address this by increasing the frequency of ACP discussions being offered and recorded on gerontology wards in an acute London Trust. Method A multi-professional steering group was established to improve ACP using PDSA methodology. A new ACP toolkit, training programme and electronic flowsheet (within the hospital’s patient record system) were implemented. ACP documentation quality was audited on gerontology wards pre and post implementation (over one to four months respectively). Data was compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test. Results ACP flowsheets were completed by junior and senior doctors, and clinical nurse specialists in frailty and palliative medicine. The initial audit found disparity between documented topics of ACP conversations, with cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations being most discussed. Post implementation, 24 ACP flowsheets were reviewed, showing that more ACP topics were documented where these conversations were had; preferred place of death increased from 24% to 60% (p 0.011); treatment escalation plan increased from 41% to 75% (p 0.014); preferred place of care increased from 59% to 71% (p 0.066). Topics not showing significant improvement in documentation (despite inclusion in the flowsheet) were spiritual needs, information needs and prognostic discussion, broader social needs and what was most important to the patient. Conclusion The implementation of an electronic ACP flowsheet improved documented ACP conversations in some topics, guiding healthcare professionals to deliver care that aligns with peoples’ wishes and preferences. Documented conversations became easier to access, review and audit. Work is still needed to promote ACP conversations being centralised around what matters most to patients.

Effectiveness of initiating advance care planning among older outpatients through intervention by physicians trained in a model discussion video: A randomized controlled trial.

This study aimed to assess the impact of a physician-led intervention on advance care planning (ACP) introduction among older outpatients using a model discussion video. This prospective interventional study included Japanese general practice outpatients aged ≥65 years. All participants received an ACP leaflet. Co-researchers were trained using a model discussion video based on the "Serious Illness Conversation Guide," and provided ACP introduction explanations to the intervention group to ensure intervention content consistency. The control group received the ACP leaflet only, with no standardized explanations. The primary outcome was ACP discussion occurrence. Secondary outcomes included ACP engagement (assessed through the 4-item ACP Engagement Survey), engagement score for advance directives acquisition and score for surrogate decision-maker identification, and anxiety incidence (assessed through Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). This study included 48 participants: 25 (52.1%) in the intervention group and 23 (47.9%) in the control group. Regarding primary outcome, the intervention group had significantly more ACP discussions compared with the control group (92.0% vs 26.1%, adjusted odds ratio 50.2, P = 0.0012). Regarding secondary outcomes, the intervention group showed greater readiness (mean scores for the 4-item Engagement Survey [P = 0.0001], engagement score for advance directives acquisition [P = 0.01] and score for surrogate decision-maker determination [P = 0.03]) than the control group, without increasing anxiety. This physician-led ACP introduction for older patients in a Japanese general practice setting enhanced ACP readiness and stimulated discussions, without increasing anxiety. The model discussion video for ACP introduction might effectively train physicians in general practice settings. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.

Proactive advance care planning conversations in general practice: a quality improvement project

Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of discussion, reflection and communication, enabling planning for future medical treatment. Despite evidence of benefits of ACP to patients, families and the healthcare...

Improving age-friendly advance care planning in primary care: Outcomes from a Pacific Northwest learning collaborative.

Advance care planning (ACP) is the process of having conversations with patients to ensure preferences are known and support patient healthcare goals. ACP and the Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) Initiative's, "What Matters," are synergistic approaches to patient-centered conversations. Implementation and measurement of ACP in primary care (PC) are variables in quality and consistency. We examined whether participation in an ACP learning collaborative (LC) would improve knowledge and ability to conduct ACP discussions and increase the frequency of documented ACP in participating practices. The WWAMI (Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho) region Practice and Research Network (WPRN) and the Northwest Geriatrics Workforce Enhancement Center collaboratively organized a 9-month virtual LC. It consisted of 4 synchronous, 1.5-h sessions, technical support, and a panel of ACP experts. A Wilcoxon rank sum test assessed differences in knowledge from a pre-post survey. Documentation of ACP in the EHR was collected after at least one plan-do-study-act cycle. We enrolled 17 participants from 6 PC practices (3 hospital-affiliated; 3 Federally Qualified Health Centers) from the WPRN. Two practices did not complete all LC activities. There was a trend toward increased ACP knowledge and skills overall especially in having discussions patients and families (pre-mean 2.9 [SD = 0.7]/post-mean 4.0[SD = 1.1], p < 0.05). 4/6 practices observed an increase in EHR documentation post-collaborative (median 16.3%, IQR 1.3%-36.9%). The LC increased PC providers knowledge and skills of ACP and AFHS's What Matters, reported ACP EHR documentation, and contributed to practice change.

#1746 Comprehensive kidney care: adopting principles of comprehensive geriatric assessment within an advanced kidney care clinic

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is increasingly prevalent among older people, a trend that presents significant healthcare challenges. This project introduces the Comprehensive Kidney Care (CKC) clinic model which incorporates elements from Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment within the Advanced Kidney Care clinic. By focusing on a holistic care, this model aims to enhance symptom management, facilitate appropriate referrals, improve documentation, and offer advance care planning (ACP), ultimately to improve care quality for older people with advanced CKD. Method We evaluated 27 patients ≥65 years old with CKD stage 4 and 5, attending the CKC clinic between 23/11/2022 and 22/11/2023. Demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded, including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Individual symptoms and total score were screened in each clinic using the Integrated Palliative Outcome Score (IPOS)-Renal Symptom Survey. Geriatric impairments were assessed including frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS]), mobility, polypharmacy (≥5 medications), activities of daily living (ADLs), falls and cognition. Actions were documented, including initiation of ACP discussions and other relevant interventions. Results Patients’ average age was 82 (SD 5.8), they were predominantly male (20 patients, 74%) and had a median eGFR of 18 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 10). They exhibited a high burden of comorbidities (CCI mean 8.4, SD 2) and a high prevalence of geriatric impairments: 74% (20 patients) had a CFS score ≥4, 63% (17) required mobility aids, 26% (7) reported falls, 30% (8) required assistance with ADLs, and all had polypharmacy. IPOS was recorded for 20 patients. Mean total score was 10.25 (IQR 8). Fig. 1 demonstrates the symptoms reported as experienced ‘moderately’ or worse at first IPOS completion. Thirteen patients had more than one IPOS completed, allowing each symptom to be compared at two consecutive clinic attendances 239 times. Symptom improvement was more common than worsening (37 [15.5%] versus 11 [4.6%]). Most times symptoms remained stable (43, 18%) or were absent (132, 55.2%), with a minority appearing 16 times (6.7%). Seventeen relevant actions were identified, including symptom management (14 patients, 51.9%), physical activity advice (7, 25.9%), referrals to other teams (12, 44.4%; 2 referred to more than one), including dietitian (4), psychology (3), frailty team (2), physiotherapy (2), memory assessment clinic, social care, falls clinic and palliative care (1 each). Preferred kidney management was discussed with 9 patients (33%); 9 patients had documented preferences before attending the CKC clinic. Ten (37%) preferred conservative care, 4 (15%) haemodialysis and 13 (48%) remained undecided. Undecided patients had a significantly higher eGFR (median 21 [IQR 4] versus 12 ml/min/1.73 m2 [IQR 6.75], p-value 0.012). ACP was discussed with 8 patients; these patients had higher CFS scores (median 6 versus 4, IQR 1.25, p-value 0.005) and higher ADL dependence (Odds ratio 8.9, p-value 0.026). Conclusion The CKC clinic model shows promise as an effective approach for assessing and managing older people with advanced CKD. Most times symptoms improved or remained unchanged, suggesting actions were effective at managing symptom burden. ACP discussions were more commonly initiated in patients with higher frailty severity and ADL dependence; obtaining geriatric impairment information may help prompt ACP discussions.

What makes advance care planning discussion so difficult? A systematic review of the factors of advance care planning in healthcare settings.

Existing systematic reviews related to advance care planning (ACP) largely focus on specific groups and intervention efficacy or are limited to contextual factors. This research aims to identify the modifiable factors perceived by different users of ACP in healthcare settings and inform healthcare professionals about the factors affecting ACP practice. Five English-language databases (ProQuest, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Medline) and two Chinese-language databases (CNKI and NCL) were searched up to November 2022. Empirical research identifying factors related to ACP in healthcare settings was included. ACP is defined as a discussion process on future end-of-life care. Thematic synthesis was performed on all included studies. A total of 1871 unique articles were screened; the full texts of 193 were assessed by 4 reviewers, and 45 articles were included for analysis. Twenty-two (54%) studies were qualitative, 15 (33%) were quantitative, and 6 (13%) used mixed methods. Foci varied from 28 (62%) studies on a single subject group (either patient, family, or physician), 11 (25%) on 2 subject groups (either patient and family or patient and healthcare professional), and 6 (13%) covered 3 subject groups (patient, family, and healthcare professional). Among the 17 studies involving more than 1 subject group, only 2 adopted a dyadic lens in analysis. Complex interwoven factors were categorized into (1) intrapersonal factors, (2) interpersonal factors, and (3) socio-environmental factors, with a total of 11 themes: personal belief, emotions, the burden on others, timing, responsiveness, relationship, family dynamics, experience, person taking the lead, culture, and support. Patients, families, and healthcare professionals are the essential stakeholders of ACP in healthcare settings. Factors are interweaved among the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and socio-environmental dimensions. Research is warranted to examine the dynamic interactions of the 3 essential stakeholders from a multidimensional perspective, and the mechanism of the interweaving of factors.

Incorporating advance care planning in dementia care.

Recent policy focus in dementia care has been on living well with the condition; however, being able to die well with dementia is of equal importance. Advance care planning (ACP) enables people to consider, express and record their wishes and preferences for palliative and end of life care, however there is a low uptake of ACP in people with dementia. Although ACP discussions should be initiated as soon as possible after a diagnosis of dementia, there are other opportunities and transition points in the person's care during which health and social care professionals could promote, engage in and support ACP discussions. This article considers the importance of ACP in dementia care and uses a case study to explore opportunities for initiating and engaging in ACP with people with dementia.

Culturally Sensitive Advance Care Planning for African American Advanced Cancer Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

ContextRacial disparities in advance care planning (ACP) have been consistently identified in the literature. Few interventions have been designed to address the disparities identified. ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a culturally sensitive, pilot ACP intervention for African American patients diagnosed with cancer in a safety net healthcare system. MethodsEligible patients with stage II, III, or IV breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer were identified from the electronic health record, recruited, and randomized to the intervention group or usual care control group. Intervention participants met with an African American lay health advisor who assisted them in watching a video that addressed completion of ACP and facilitated ACP discussion. Descriptive analyses were conducted to examine baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, cancer health literacy, and religious coping among participants. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate predictors of positive change in stage of intent to discuss ACP at 1, 3, and 6-months post intervention. ResultsSeventy-six participants were recruited and randomized (38 intervention, 38 controls). The mean age for participants was 58.8 years (SD 10.8), 62.5% were female, and 90.2% had stage III or IV disease. The intervention proved feasible with 89.5% completion. Intervention participants were more likely to have a positive change in stage of intent to discuss a living will or advance directive than usual care controls at one-month (AOR: 4.57, 95%CI: 1.11, 18.82) and 3-months (AOR: 5.38, 95%CI: 1.05, 27.68) post-intervention. The majority (94.1%) of intervention participants would recommend the intervention to a friend or family member. ConclusionThis culturally sensitive ACP program proved to be feasible, acceptable to participants, and showed some promise in promoting discussion about ACP among participants and members of their healthcare team.

Advance care planning in the treatment of implantable left ventricular assist device: a republication of the review published in Japanese Journal of Artificial Organs.

Advance care planning (ACP) is essential in managing serious and chronic illnesses to ensure that patients receive care aligned with their personal values, goals, and preferences. This review focuses on integrating ACP in the treatment of patients receiving implantable left ventricular assist devices (VADs). The heart failure palliative care team developed a unique advance directive form and pamphlet to facilitate ACP discussions, emphasizing not only medical treatment preferences but also patients' values and life goals.The study highlights the distinction between bridge to transplantation (BTT) and destination therapy (DT) in VAD patients, with different goals and considerations for ACP. The use of decision aids developed especially for DT candidates as a communication tool helps in sharing patients' wishes and facilitates shared decision-making, particularly in the complex decisions surrounding DT therapy.Challenges in implementing ACP, such as time constraints due to urgent medical conditions, difficulties in patient communication, and the recent COVID-19 pandemic, are addressed. The need for a comprehensive healthcare system capable of supporting patients' ACP wishes, especially in the community setting, is also pointed out.Future directions include not only developing materials to ease ACP discussions and ensuring that ACP content is shared among healthcare providers to foster collaborative and detailed planning, but also a call for widespread adoption of ACP in Japan.This is a translation of a paper written in Japanese Journal of Artificial Organs (Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 89-92) with additions and corrections.

Applying the Multiphase Optimization Strategy for Development of a Culturally Tailored Resilience-Building Intervention to Facilitate Advance Care Planning Discussions for Chinese Americans: Protocol for a Feasibility Study (Preprint)

Applying the Multiphase Optimization Strategy for Development of a Culturally Tailored Resilience-Building Intervention to Facilitate Advance Care Planning Discussions for Chinese Americans: Protocol for a Feasibility Study (Preprint)

IT-assisted comprehensive geriatric assessment for residents in care homes: quasi-experimental longitudinal study

BackgroundFrailty interventions such as Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can provide significant benefits for older adults living with frailty. However, incorporating such proactive interventions into primary care remains a challenge. We developed an IT-assisted CGA (i-CGA) process, which includes advance care planning (ACP). We assessed if, in older care home residents, particularly those with severe frailty, i-CGA could improve access to advance care planning discussions and reduce unplanned hospitalisations.MethodAs a quality improvement project we progressively incorporated our i-CGA process into routine primary care for older care home residents, and used a quasi-experimental approach to assess its interim impact. Residents were assessed for frailty by General Practitioners. Proactive i-CGAs were completed, including consideration of traditional CGA domains, deprescribing and ACP discussions. Interim analysis was conducted at 1 year: documented completion, preferences and adherence to ACPs, unplanned hospital admissions, and mortality rates were compared for i-CGA and control (usual care) groups, 1-year post-i-CGA or post-frailty diagnosis respectively. Documented ACP preferences and place of death were compared using the Chi-Square Test. Unplanned hospital admissions and bed days were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.ResultsAt one year, the i-CGA group comprised 196 residents (severe frailty 111, 57%); the control group 100 (severe frailty 56, 56%). ACP was documented in 100% of the i-CGA group, vs. 72% of control group, p < 0.0001. 85% (94/111) of severely frail i-CGA residents preferred not to be hospitalised if they became acutely unwell. For those with severe frailty, mean unplanned admissions in the control (usual care) group increased from 0.87 (95% confidence interval ± 0.25) per person year alive to 2.05 ± 1.37, while in the i-CGA group they fell from 0.86 ± 0.24 to 0.68 ± 0.37, p = 0.22. Preferred place of death was largely adhered to in both groups, where documented. Of those with severe frailty, 55% (62/111) of the i-CGA group died, vs. 77% (43/56) of the control group, p = 0.0013.ConclusionsProactive, community-based i-CGA can improve documentation of care home residents’ ACP preferences, and may reduce unplanned hospital admissions. In severely frail residents, a mortality reduction was seen in those who received an i-CGA.

A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Interventions to Increase Advance Care Planning.

Although interventions can increase advance care planning (ACP) engagement, it remains unclear which interventions to choose in primary care settings. This study compares a passive intervention (mailed materials) to an interactive intervention (group visits) on participant ACP engagement and experiences. We used mixed methods to examine ACP engagement at baseline and six months following two ACP interventions. Eligible patients were randomized to receive mailed materials or participate in two ACP group visits. We administered the 4-item ACP Engagement survey (n = 110) and conducted interviews (n = 23). We compared mean scores and percent change in ACP engagement, analyzed interviews with directed content analysis to understand participants' ACP experiences, and integrated the findings based on mailed materials or group visits intervention. All participants demonstrated increased ACP engagement scores. At six months, group visit participants reported higher percent change in mean overall score compared with mailed materials participants (+8% vs +3%, P < .0001). Group visits participants reported that being prompted to think about end-of-life preferences, gaining knowledge about ACP, and understanding the value of completing ACP documentation influenced their ACP readiness. While both interventions encouraged patients to start considering and refining their end-of-life preferences, group visits made patients feel more knowledgeable about ACP, highlighted the importance of completing ACP documentation early, and sparked further ACP discussions with others. While primary care patients may benefit from mailed ACP materials, patients reported increased readiness after ACP group visits. Group visits emphasized the value of upstream preparation, ongoing conversations, and increased knowledge about ACP.

Factors Associated with Completion of Advance Directives among Advanced Care Planning Outpatients at a Regional Hospital in Southern Taiwan

&lt;p&gt;目的：在台灣，民眾可以透過「預立醫療照護諮商」門診簽署「預立醫療決定」，然而諮商門診目前仍未被廣泛使用。本研究目的是希望了解影響民眾來本院參與預立醫療照護諮商門診和簽署完成預立醫療決定的相關因素。&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;方法：我們使用回朔性病歷研究，研究對象為針對2019年1月1日到2020年2月28日來本院諮商門診的參與者。校正相關共變項後，使用羅吉斯回歸評估完成預立醫療決定的相關影響因素。&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;結果：總共144位參加者被納入研究，預立醫療決定完成率為90.2%。較多的參加者為年齡較大、女性、較為健康、費用較低和之前已簽過預立安寧緩和醫療暨維生醫療抉擇意願書。校正相關共變項後，之前已簽過預立安寧緩和醫療暨維生醫療抉擇意願書的參加者有較高的機會完成預立醫療決定(aOR 14.56, 95% CI 1.62-131.23)；參加者與有社工參與的諮商團隊進行諮商有較高的機會完成預立醫療決定(aOR 5.59, 95% CI 1.05-28.87)。&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;結論：諮商門診的參加者其預立醫療決定完成率高，之前已簽過預立安寧緩和醫療暨維生醫療抉擇意願書的參加者有較高機會完成預立醫療決定。諮商時，針對參加者個別情況進行討論和使用輔助資料理解諮商內容，協助完成預立醫療決定。未來能針對社區民眾衛教宣導預立醫療照護諮商門診的諮詢服務，針對從未簽過預立安寧緩和醫療暨維生醫療抉擇意願書的民眾更需進一步的推廣。&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Purpose: Advance care planning (ACP) is the process of communicating a person&amp;rsquo;s preferences regarding future medical care. In Taiwan, people can visit an ACP outpatient clinic and complete advance directives (AD). ACP is an emerging medical service, and information about completing AD is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting AD completion among ACP clinic outpatients at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Methods: This retrospective study used chart reviews to evaluate participants who attended an ACP outpatient clinic from 1 January 2019 to 28 February 2020. AD completion was analyzed using logistic regression after adjusting for covariates including previously signing do-not-resuscitate (DNR) forms.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Results: A total of 144 participants were included, and the AD completion rate was 90.2%. Participants attending ACP sessions were more likely to be older, female, having a high school education and below, better health status, paying less for ACP sessions, and previously signing DNR forms. After adjusting for the covariates, participants who had previously signed DNR forms were more likely to complete AD (aOR 14.03, 95% CI 1.56-126.06). In addition, the presence of a social worker in the ACP team was significantly associated with higher AD completion (aOR 5.74, 95% CI 1.05-31.32).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Conclusions: Participants previously signing DNR forms were more likely to completion AD. In addition to tailoring ACP discussions about the benefits of AD and providing supplement materials to improve AD completion, further strategies are needed to encourage the public in southern Taiwan to visit ACP outpatient clinics, especially for those who were unfamiliar with concepts such as DNR or life-sustaining treatment at the end of life.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

Effectiveness of an Advance Care Planning Intervention in Adults Receiving Dialysis and Their Families

Evidence of effectiveness of advance care planning (ACP) strategies for patients receiving dialysis and their families is needed. To test the effectiveness of an ACP intervention to prepare patients and their surrogates for end-of-life (EOL) decision-making and to improve surrogate bereavement outcomes. This cluster randomized clinical trial, An Effectiveness-Implementation Trial of SPIRIT (Sharing Patients' Illness Representations to Increase Trust) in ESRD, was conducted from December 2017 to March 2023 and included 42 dialysis clinics in 5 US states (Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia) randomized to provide intervention or usual care. Recruitment was from February 15, 2018, to January 31, 2022, and patient-surrogate dyads were followed up for 21 months (until January 17, 2023) or until patient death. Each clinic selected 1 or 2 health care workers (eg, nurse practitioner, registered nurse, or social worker) to conduct 45- to 60-minute ACP discussions with dyads in the clinic or remotely. After March 13, 2020 (commencement of the COVID-19 emergency declaration), all discussions were conducted remotely. An ACP summary was placed in patients' medical records. The primary, 2-week preparedness outcomes were dyad congruence on EOL goals of care, patient decisional conflict, surrogate decision-making confidence, and a composite of dyad congruence and surrogate decision-making confidence. Secondary bereavement outcomes were anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic distress 3 months after patient death. To adjust for COVID-19 pandemic effects on bereavement outcomes, a variable to indicate the timing of baseline and 3-month assessment relative to the COVID-19 emergency declaration was created. Of the 426 dyads enrolled, 231 were in the intervention clinics, and 195 were in the control clinics. Among all dyads, the mean (SD) patient age was 61.9 (12.7) years, and the mean (SD) surrogate age was 53.7 (15.4) years. At 2 weeks, after adjusting for baseline values, dyad congruence (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12-2.31; P = .001), decisional conflict scores (β, -0.10; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.07; P < .001), and the composite (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.06-2.34; P = .03) were higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Surrogate decision-making confidence was similar between groups (β, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.13; P = .12). Among 77 bereaved surrogates, after adjusting for baseline values and assessment timing, intervention group anxiety was lower than control group anxiety (β, -1.55; 95% CI, -3.08 to -0.01; P = .05); however, depression (β, -0.18; 95% CI, -2.09 to 1.73; P = .84) and posttraumatic distress (β, -0.96; 95% CI, -7.39 to 5.46; P = .75) were similar. In this randomized clinical trial, the ACP intervention implemented by health care workers at dialysis centers improved preparation for EOL decision-making but showed mixed effectiveness on bereavement outcomes. The ACP intervention implemented in dialysis centers may be an effective strategy to the dyad preparation for end-of-life care as opposed to the current focus on advance directives. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03138564.

Feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning in outpatient clinics: A qualitative study of health-care professionals experience.

This study sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a facilitated advance care planning (ACP) intervention implemented in outpatient clinics, as perceived by health-care professionals (HCPs). Data from seven focus groups (n = 27) and nine semi-structured interviews with HCPs recruited as part of a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (RCT) were analysed using qualitative descriptive methodology. Components of the intervention included HCP education and training, tools to assist HCPs with patient selection, hardcopy information, and ACP documentation, and specialised nurse-facilitators to support HCPs to complete ACP conversations and documentation with patients and caregivers. Health-care professionals working in tertiary outpatient clinics perceived the facilitated ACP intervention as feasible and acceptable. Health-care professionals reported a high level of satisfaction with key elements of the intervention, including the specialised education and training, screening and assessment procedures and ongoing support from the nurse-facilitators. Health-care professionals reported this training and support increased their confidence and ACP knowledge, leading to more frequent ACP discussions with patients and their families. Health-care professionals noted their ability to conduct ACP screening and assessment in clinic was impeded by large clinical caseloads and patient-related factors (e.g., dementia diagnoses, and emotional distress). Additional barriers to ACP implementation identified by HCPs included poor collaboration, constrained time and clinical space, undefined roles and standardised recording procedures for HCPs. Facilitated ACP intervention in outpatient clinics is perceived by HCPs as feasible and acceptable. Addressing barriers and tailoring implementation strategies may improve the delivery of ACP as part of tertiary outpatient care.

1998 Advance care planning on the Same Day Emergency Care Older People's Unit - a quality improvement initiative

Abstract Introduction Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) at St James’ Hospital, Leeds provides urgent care at the interface between primary and secondary care, offering comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to those living with frailty, aiming to prevent hospitalisation and delay frailty progression. Advance care planning (ACP) is a vital component of prioritising care preferences including at end-of-life, but timing often falls short in practice. This quality improvement (QI) initiative aims to proactively open ACP discussions, allowing patients to consider their care goals, ensuring our care is aligned with their priorities. Method Between July 2022 and April 2023, the project involved 1039 patients. Led by Advanced Clinical Practitioners with support from consultant geriatricians and a palliative care specialist nurse, ACP discussions were encouraged through prompts in daily staff huddles and drop-in teaching sessions. Results ACP uptake increased from 7.8 % to 19.3%. Insights from a perception survey involving 83 healthcare professionals revealed key barriers including clinical workload, limited space, lack of experience and confidence as well as prognostic uncertainty and patient factors. Education and training, clinical supervision, patient information leaflets and a conducive environment were positively associated with ACP. Conclusion There has been a cultural shift in the department as the practitioners now routinely prompt staff to undertake ACP in safety huddles. Key catalysts for ACP initiation were found to be progression of frailty, terminal diagnoses, dementia, and recurrent hospital admissions. As a new SDEC unit is scheduled to open in the coming months, with provision of space and privacy, our aim is to improve the quality and quantity of ACP discussions with the patient at the centre of all decision-making. In line with these endeavours, parallel support within the community through our home (virtual) ward will further enhance proactive care planning in older people living with frailty.