Advance Care Planning Completion Research Articles

Culturally Sensitive Advance Care Planning for African American Advanced Cancer Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

ContextRacial disparities in advance care planning (ACP) have been consistently identified in the literature. Few interventions have been designed to address the disparities identified. ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a culturally sensitive, pilot ACP intervention for African American patients diagnosed with cancer in a safety net healthcare system. MethodsEligible patients with stage II, III, or IV breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer were identified from the electronic health record, recruited, and randomized to the intervention group or usual care control group. Intervention participants met with an African American lay health advisor who assisted them in watching a video that addressed completion of ACP and facilitated ACP discussion. Descriptive analyses were conducted to examine baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, cancer health literacy, and religious coping among participants. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate predictors of positive change in stage of intent to discuss ACP at 1, 3, and 6-months post intervention. ResultsSeventy-six participants were recruited and randomized (38 intervention, 38 controls). The mean age for participants was 58.8 years (SD 10.8), 62.5% were female, and 90.2% had stage III or IV disease. The intervention proved feasible with 89.5% completion. Intervention participants were more likely to have a positive change in stage of intent to discuss a living will or advance directive than usual care controls at one-month (AOR: 4.57, 95%CI: 1.11, 18.82) and 3-months (AOR: 5.38, 95%CI: 1.05, 27.68) post-intervention. The majority (94.1%) of intervention participants would recommend the intervention to a friend or family member. ConclusionThis culturally sensitive ACP program proved to be feasible, acceptable to participants, and showed some promise in promoting discussion about ACP among participants and members of their healthcare team.

Feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning in outpatient clinics: A qualitative study of health-care professionals experience.

This study sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a facilitated advance care planning (ACP) intervention implemented in outpatient clinics, as perceived by health-care professionals (HCPs). Data from seven focus groups (n = 27) and nine semi-structured interviews with HCPs recruited as part of a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (RCT) were analysed using qualitative descriptive methodology. Components of the intervention included HCP education and training, tools to assist HCPs with patient selection, hardcopy information, and ACP documentation, and specialised nurse-facilitators to support HCPs to complete ACP conversations and documentation with patients and caregivers. Health-care professionals working in tertiary outpatient clinics perceived the facilitated ACP intervention as feasible and acceptable. Health-care professionals reported a high level of satisfaction with key elements of the intervention, including the specialised education and training, screening and assessment procedures and ongoing support from the nurse-facilitators. Health-care professionals reported this training and support increased their confidence and ACP knowledge, leading to more frequent ACP discussions with patients and their families. Health-care professionals noted their ability to conduct ACP screening and assessment in clinic was impeded by large clinical caseloads and patient-related factors (e.g., dementia diagnoses, and emotional distress). Additional barriers to ACP implementation identified by HCPs included poor collaboration, constrained time and clinical space, undefined roles and standardised recording procedures for HCPs. Facilitated ACP intervention in outpatient clinics is perceived by HCPs as feasible and acceptable. Addressing barriers and tailoring implementation strategies may improve the delivery of ACP as part of tertiary outpatient care.

Relationship between implementation of systematic advance care planning and the quality of death among nursing home residents: a survey.

Advance care planning (ACP) is beneficial for the quality of death (QOD). However, the effects of ACP on the QOD may vary across cultures. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the 15-step ACP program and the QOD among Japanese nursing home residents. A cross-sectional survey. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among the family members of 39 nursing home residents who died between April 2017 and March 2019 by distributing the survey questionnaire by post. The survey included questions about the QOD of residents, and responses were evaluated using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) scale. Responses were obtained from 30 of the 39 bereaved families (76.9%). Data were analyzed using hierarchical clustering to determine five groups and conduct multiple comparisons. The following three domains of interest were identified: 'Dying in a favorite place', 'Good relationship with the medical staff', and 'Independence'. GDI scores were significantly higher for residents with higher ACP completion rates than for those with lower rates (p < 0.01). Residents who had taken ACP interviews had significantly higher GDI scores (p < 0.01) than those who had not taken interviews. Overall, these findings suggest that systematic ACP might be related to the QOD among Japanese nursing home residents in the above mentioned three domains. Limitations of the present study were small sample size, cross-sectional survey design as opposed to a cohort survey design, and multiple biases, including the emotional instability of bereaved family members, the length of stay of the residents, the degree of dementia of the residents, and their tendency to talk about the place of death and to develop good relationships with the medical staff.

Improving Advance Care Planning for Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure.

Advance care planning (ACP) is a valuable and proven approach for enhancing end-of-life communication and quality of life for individuals with heart failure (HF) and their family members. However, the adoption of ACP in practice is still lower than desired. According to University of California, Irvine Medical Center HF metrics, only 15.3% of hospitalized HF patients had completed ACP documentation before discharge, as recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). This quality improvement project aimed to investigate whether the rate of ACP completion could be increased by utilizing EMR reminders to health care teams regarding individual patients. Personalized reminders were sent to providers for each hospitalized patient diagnosed with HF, who did not have existing ACP documentation in the EMR, to encourage completion of ACP documentation. Our findings have shown that, during the three-month intervention period, the average ACP completion rate was 21.0%. This represents a 5.7% absolute increase in ACP completion compared to the six months before our intervention (15.3%); a relative increase of 37.3%. Direct message reminders to providers prove to be an effective method for enhancing ACP completion among this specific patient group.

Determinants of Health and Outcomes in Medicare Recipients with Heart Disease: A Population Study.

Heart disease (HD) is a primary cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States. While there is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the contribution of social determinants of health (SDoH) to HD outcomes, the impact of combined or individual SDoH on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with HD is not well understood. To analyze the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) to explore the relationship of SDoH with HRQoL, advance care planning, and treatment preferences in Medicare beneficiaries with HD. The study design was a secondary data analysis using latent class analysis (LCA) and multivariable analysis of NHATS participants with HD, Round 8, that included End of Life Plans and Care questions. 1202 participants, median age 81 years, 57% female, 70% non-Hispanic White, 20% non-Hispanic Black, 10% Other. LCA identified two SDoH risk profiles (low/high), using twelve measures within the NHATS Economic and Social Consequences key concept area. The high-risk SDoH profile participants were more likely to have fair/poor HRQoL, and identify as female, non-White (p<0.0001); and less likely to have completed advance care planning (p<0.0001). High-risk SDoH participants were more likely to want life-prolonging treatments (p<0.0001), however, this association was not significant after adjusting for age, sex, and race (p=0.344). Higher risk SDoH profiles are associated with reduced HRQoL, reduced advance care planning completion, female sex, and non-White race in a cohort of Medicare beneficiaries. These findings provide opportunities to improve SDoH-related care practices in older patients with HD.

Deployment of a Digital Advance Care Planning Platform at an Accountable Care Organization.

Advance care planning (ACP), a process of sharing one's values and preferences for future medical treatments, can improve quality of life, reduce loved ones' anxiety, and decrease unwanted medical utilization and costs. Despite benefits to patients and health care systems, ACP uptake often remains low, due partially to lack of knowledge and difficulty initiating discussions. Digital tools may help reduce these barriers to entry. We retrospectively examined data from pilot deployment of Koda Health patient-facing ACP among Houston Methodist Coordinated Care patients, for quality improvement (QI) purposes. Patients referred by nurse navigators could access Koda's digital platform, complete ACP, and share the legal documentation generated. Analyzed measures include usage rates and ACP-related decisions within the platform. Of eligible patients (n = 203), 52.7% voluntarily completed their plan. Engagement and completion rates were similar across demographics. Patients indicated majority preference (66.4%) toward spending the last days of life at home. Most patients indicated wanting no life-support intervention if quality of life became unacceptable (51 to 71% across 4 treatments). Life-support decisions were similar between demographic categories, excepting CPR and dialysis, wherein a greater portion of Black patients than White patients preferred at least trial intervention, rather than none. As an observational QI analysis, limitations include bounded geographical reach and lack of data on ACP impacts to subsequent health care utilization, which future studies will address. Findings suggest that digital health tools like Koda can effectively facilitate equitable ACP access and may help support health systems and providers in offering comprehensive ACP.

I kua na'u "Let me carry out your last wishes" Clinical trial protocol to promote advance care planning among native Hawaiian populations

Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a communication process about serious illness decision making designed to inform patients of possible medical options. Native Hawaiians consistently have low rates of ACP and low use of palliative and hospice care services. Our multidisciplinary community and research group partnered to create I kua na'u “Let Me Carry Out Your Last Wishes,” an ACP intervention featuring culturally tailored videos and are now testing its efficacy. Focus groups and informant interviews were conducted with Native Hawaiian community members to ensure the curriculum honored the history, opinions, and culture of Native Hawaiians. Native Hawaiian culture has traditionally been an oral culture; the spoken word transmitted the moʻolelo, stories, traditions, histories and genealogies, which merges seamlessly with video media. The I kua na'u intervention included multiple educational sessions enhanced with videos (informational and personal). The specific aims are to compare ACP knowledge (primary outcome) and readiness for ACP engagement, ACP preferences, decisional conflict, and ACP completion rates via electronic medical record review (secondary outcomes) in 220 Native Hawaiians over age 55 in: (a) a randomized controlled trial of 110 people recruited from ambulatory clinics, and (b) a pre-post study design among 110 people living on Hawaiian Homestead communities located on lands set aside for Native Hawaiians or assisted living.Our protocol aims to evaluate the efficacy of our video-based educational intervention for Native Hawaiians to support decision making in this community and decrease disparities in serious illness care.Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04771208

Community-led, peer-facilitated Advance Care Planning workshops prompt increased Advance Care Planning behaviors among public attendees

ObjectiveDespite recognized benefits, engagement in Advance Care Planning (ACP) remains low. Research into peer-facilitated, group ACP interventions is limited. This study investigated the acceptability of community-led peer-facilitated ACP workshops for the public and whether these workshops are associated with increased knowledge, motivation and engagement in ACP behaviors. MethodsPeer-facilitators from 9 community organizations were recruited and trained to deliver free ACP workshops to members of the public with an emphasis on conversation. Using a cohort design, workshop acceptability and engagement in ACP behaviors was assessed by surveying public participants at the end of the workshop and 4–6 weeks later. Results217 participants returned post-workshop questionnaires, and 69 returned follow-up questionnaires. Over 90% of participants felt they gained knowledge across all 6 learning goals. Every ACP behavior saw a statistically significant increase in participant completion after 4–6 weeks. Almost all participants were glad they attended (94%) and would recommend the workshop to others (95%). ConclusionThis study revealed an association of peer-facilitated ACP workshops and completion of ACP behaviors in public participants. InnovationThis innovative approach supports investment in the spread of community-based, peer-facilitated ACP workshops for the public as important ACP promotion strategies.

Increasing advance care planning referrals for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in the emergency department

In Singapore General Hospital (SGH), patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are referred for advance care planning (ACP) at the specialist outpatient clinics with about 50 cases referred a year and a completion rate of 10%. One of the commonly cited reasons by patients is that they are feeling well currently and do not need to talk about ACP at that moment. The Emergency Department (ED) saw about 240 COPD patients of P2 or P3 acuity yearly and might be a strategic place for ACP advocacy to take place for COPD patients who are triaged as P2 or P3 acuity. While the memory of the recent exacerbation remains fresh, it could be an opportune moment to start an ACP conversation with such patients in the ED. A quality improvement project (QIP) led by both ED nurses and doctors was executed to increase the number of ACP referrals for COPD patients from the ED. A total of 16 COPD ACP referrals were made, up from the previous baseline of zero. Of note, two of the 16 referrals (12.5%) completed the ACP process. Four more (25%) are still in midst of ACP completion at time of project conclusion.

Caring for Children in Relation to Financial Hardship, Advance Care Planning, and Genetic Testing Among Adolescent and Young Adults with Cancer.

Purpose: When a cancer diagnosis coincides with caring for children, it may influence the financial impacts of cancer and decisions to pursue advance care planning (ACP) or genetic testing. We examined associations between caring for children and financial hardship, ACP, and genetic testing among female adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors in North Carolina and California. Methods: Participants were diagnosed at ages 15-39 years with breast, melanoma, gynecologic, lymphoma, or thyroid cancer during 2004-2016. We estimated adjusted prevalence differences (aPDs) and ratios (aPRs) for each outcome by child caring status using marginal structural binomial regression models. Results: Among 1595 women ages 19-54 years at survey (median = 7 years since diagnosis), 819 (51.3%) reported that they were caring for children at diagnosis. Women caring for children had a higher prevalence of material financial hardship (e.g., medical debt; 30% vs. 21.9%; aPD = 9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3 to 14; aPR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.72) but similar levels of psychological financial hardship compared to noncaregivers. Women caring for children were more likely to complete ACPs (42.2% vs. 30.7%; aPD = 9%, 95% CI: 3 to 16; aPR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.57). Among the 723 survivors of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer, the prevalence of genetic testing was higher among women caring for children (89%) than noncaregivers (81%); this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Women caring for children at diagnosis may be at elevated risk for adverse financial outcomes and may benefit from additional financial navigation support. Childcare responsibilities may further complicate health decision-making for AYAs diagnosed with cancer.

Improving uptake of advance care planning through education and training in a public hospital geriatric clinic.

Advance care planning (ACP) is an important part of routine medical care. However, Western Australia (WA) consistently demonstrates poor rates of completion. International and interstate ACP programs have previously led to an increase in ACP discussion and documentation. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of a multifaceted intervention on completion of ACP in a geriatric outpatient setting in WA. The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle was used for this audit. The components of the intervention comprised of education and communication skill training, improving access to ACP documents and patient resources. Pre- and post-intervention reviews of documented future care planning discussions were performed and compared. Of the 100 patients audited, there was an absolute increase of 23% (p = 0.02) in any form of future care planning. More specifically, discussions regarding ACP increased by 13% (p = 0.01), Advance Care Directive (ACD) by 23% (p < 0.001), Enduring Power of Attorney (EPA) by 24% (p = 0.02), Enduring Power of Guardianship (EPG) by 31% (p = 0.002), together with a 10% (p = 0.02) increase in the provision of ACP resources to patients. Older patient age (p = 0.02) and abnormal cognitive testing (p = 0.02), but not established dementia, were patient-related factors associated with initiation of ACP discussions. A simple structured multifaceted intervention improved the uptake of ACP discussions in a hospital geriatric clinic.

Advance Care Planning With Black Women with Breast Cancer: A Community Health Worker Model.

Despite the importance of advance care planning (ACP), a process that optimizes future medical treatment and end-of-life care, for at-risk populations, rates of patient-provider ACP conversations are extremely low among Black women with breast cancer. Community health workers (CHWs) are well-positioned to support patients in engaging in ACP conversations with their providers; yet research on integrating CHWs to promote ACP is scant. The current study examined multilevel facilitators and barriers to successful ACP conversations among Black women from the perspective of providers and CHWs who serve this community. Providers and CHWs were recruited from an academic medical center in a large urban city. Retrospective qualitative data on barriers and facilitators to ACP conversations, as well as CHWs' training needs, were collected from two focus groups (N = 5 providers, N = 5 CHWs) and one individual interview (N = 1 provider), and transcribed and coded for themes. All providers reported working primarily with Black patients, and identified stigma and time constraints as major barriers to ACP discussions; they also identified the structural barriers and injustices that their patients face during medical care. CHWs reported having a trusted relationship with their patients and flexibility in their care that would allow for ongoing ACP conversations, discussing their ability to serve as a bridge between the patient and provider. However, CHWs discussed that they lacked the tools and skills to have ACP conversations, largely because existing formal trainings in ACP are cost prohibitive. Competing priorities of the provider to discuss/treat the patient's disease and medical mistrust were major barriers to successful ACP conversations among Black women with breast cancer, leading to ACP completion occurring late in treatment. CHWs are uniquely qualified to overcome multilevel barriers to ACP and establish trusting relationships with patients in order to facilitate earlier and ongoing communication between patients and providers.

Breaking the Readmission Cycle

Breaking the Readmission Cycle Brian Hatten I want to share the story of my difficult patient Ms. L. She has twenty-seven current medical issues. Thirty-five active prescriptions. Limited mobility requiring the use of a motorized scooter. Non-medical care gaps. And over twenty hospital admissions since 2020. I met Ms. L approximately five years ago as her hospital attending and have continued to care for her during her frequent hospitalizations. I could recite this 77-year-old female's litany of medical problems. But sufficed to say, her history is complex, with her admitting diagnoses running the gambit from cellulitis to gastrointestinal bleeding to altered mental status. But, her diagnosis and frequent exacerbations of congestive heart failure (CHF) are particularly frustrating for us both and will be my focus today. CHF makes her susceptible to fluid overload leading to feelings of shortness of breath, which progresses to respiratory distress. Like other individuals with CHF, she uses diuretics to prevent herself from becoming fluid overloaded. And, like many individuals who take diuretics, she hates them. She (un)affectionately calls her water pills "the bomb" because the effect is sudden, profound, and explosive when they begin working. The combination of the diuretic effect and her limited mobility causes significant emotional stress for Ms. L, a woman who values presenting herself outwardly as in control, well-dressed, and put together. Her dislike of the medical effect of her diuretics has led to her either taking them less often or outright discontinuing them. So, while discontinuation avoids those frustrating effects, it leads to fluid accumulation, subsequent respiratory distress, and readmission to the hospital. Her medical records mention she has memory issues. It is unclear how much her mild cognitive impairment affects her frequent readmissions. We have had many conversations where I would never suspect something was amiss. But sometimes, she can be forgetful and does not recall our recent discussions. That being said, she knows the names and uses of her medications. She can report to me her home weights when she checks them and knows what her "dry" weight should be. Yet, she does not act when her scales begin reading heavier or when she develops leg swelling. Instead, she presents to the emergency department in extremis. When directly questioned about why she lets her situation deteriorate to such a state that she requires hospitalization, she demurs. She comments that she can often be stubborn, that the diuretic effect of "the bomb" is burdensome, but always reminds me she is honest in admitting she wasn't taking her water pills. During several admissions, I worried for her survival after she had self-discontinued her medications and showed up at the emergency department in respiratory failure. For any patient with recurrent admissions, I discuss their overall goals of care to ensure we are working together toward achievable medical ends. But this conversation was essential to have with Ms. L. The possibility existed that she would present to the hospital too late in her disease process, and we would not be able to correct her respiratory failure. I wanted to ensure that the hospital staff and I respected her wishes regarding her care. Despite raising my concerns, she would [End Page 22] decline to discuss her wishes. Even worse, attempting to have her complete advance care planning documents like advance directives or a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form was a futile endeavor. Ms. L was always vague and non-committal. She simply did not want to engage in those types of conversations. When asked why she declined to discuss these issues, Ms. L would reply that she was doing okay, the discussion was unnecessary, and she had family members to make those decisions for her. Caring for her during her hospital stays was a source of professional frustration for me. Her recurrent admissions made me feel like I was failing her. During each hospital stay, we would go over her medications. We repeatedly discussed how she should check her weights daily and monitor for lower extremity edema. We created multiple action plans for when to call her physicians so we could head off another hospital visit. We completed all the...

A Pilot Study of a Palliative Care Service Embedded in a Hepatology Clinic at a Large Public Hospital.

Background: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients carry heavy symptom burdens and risk receiving aggressive and sometimes unwanted care at end of life. Palliative care (PC), which aims to alleviate symptoms and facilitate goal-concordant care in serious illness, may offer substantial benefits for ESLD patients but is not widely provided. Objectives: To assess the impact of PC integrated within hepatology (PCIH) services on health care utilization, advance care planning (ACP), and hospice enrollment. Design: We compared patients who received PCIH (n = 55) to a retrospective cohort (n = 57) receiving usual care in an outpatient hepatology clinic. Setting/Subjects: From June 2016 to November 2017, we enrolled patients receiving care in a U.S. public hospital clinic who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) ESLD with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score ≥20, (2) hepatology approval for PC referral, and (3) at least one advanced complication of ESLD. Measurements: We assessed patient demographics, clinical information, health care insurance status, health care utilization, completion of psychosocial assessments, and ACP using two-sided Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Patients receiving PCIH more frequently had goals of care discussions (87.3% vs. 21.2% p ≤ 0.01), completed ACP documentation (56.4% vs. 7.0%, p ≤ 0.01), psychosocial assessments (98.2% vs. 35.1%, p ≤ 0.01), and hospice enrollment (25.5% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.01). Patients receiving PCIH who were hospitalized also had fewer mean hospitalization days (13 vs. 19.7 days, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: Embedding PC services in a hepatology clinic is a promising strategy to improve care for ESLD patients in public hospitals.

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING MOTIVATED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed older adults to complex healthcare situations, via personal experience or media stories about serious illness. Hearing about lengthy intubation, sedation, rapid decline, and distress at the end of life has the potential to prompt people to reevaluate their perspective on their own end-of-life care. This study explored advance care planning (ACP) among older adults and whether COVID-19 experiences altered their healthcare preferences and planning. One hundred and fifty-one respondents (M age = 71.2 yrs, range = 55–93) completed an online survey about ACP completion, ACP conversations, and life-prolonging interventions. Respondents were mainly female (78%), White (71%), and well educated (77% with at least a bachelor’s degree). A substantial proportion had not completed an advance directive (31%) or chosen a medical power of attorney (33%), and 78% of them intended to complete them in the next year or had initiated ACP. Among those who had completed ACP, a quarter intended to make changes, with 13% less open to life-prolonging medical treatments and 13% more open to them. Despite these intentions, a small proportion of people had ACP conversations since the start of the pandemic with their spouse/partner (37%), children (25%), siblings, (19%), friends (27%), primary care physician (16%), or other healthcare provider (12%). Results of this study suggest that now may be a critical moment to encourage older adults to have ACP conversations, in light of how their experience during the pandemic has motivated a reconsideration of treatment preferences.

ADVANCE CARE PLANNING FOR SPANISH-LANGUAGE SPEAKERS: PATIENT, FAMILY, AND INTERPRETER PERSPECTIVES

Abstract Language access is a challenge to advance care planning (ACP). Spanish-language speakers are the largest non-English speaking population in the US. While ACP tools have been translated into Spanish, it is unclear how heterogeneity in country of origin may affect the generalizability of translations across diverse US Spanish-speaking populations. The study objective is to describe challenges and facilitators to ACP for diverse populations of Spanish-language speakers. We conducted 3 focus groups with a total of 29 participants from members of Spanish-language speaking communities whose countries of origin were predominantly from the Caribbean, Central, and South America. Eligibility included being 18 years or older, being a native Spanish-speaker, and having direct experience with ACP as a patient, caregiver, or medical interpreter. We conducted thematic analysis with axial coding. Themes include: 1. Linguistic Challenges with Current ACP Translations; 2. Effect of Country of Origin and Culture on ACP Understanding; 3. Impact of Local Healthcare System Cultural on ACP; and 4. Need for ACP to be Normalized into the Local Community. ACP is both a cultural practice and a clinical practice. Recommendations for improving ACP completion for non-English speakers extend far beyond translation, since simply translating ACP tools without a cultural context is neither equitable nor inclusive. A key step is normalizing ACP into the local community. Understanding the intersection of local healthcare systems of ACP practice with the patient’s and family’s cultures of origin will facilitate introducing ACP in a culturally sensitive manner.

ADVANCED-CARE PLANNING IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION AND INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE: NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS

ADVANCED-CARE PLANNING IN PULMONARY HYPERTENSION AND INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE: NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS

Expansion of an advance care planning initiative in patients with metastatic cancer: Successes and challenges.

197 Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) activities including dialogs about care preferences, patient goals, and advance directives are an important component of cancer care. A pilot ACP initiative has been expanded to include additional sites of cancer care within the Cedars-Sinai Cancer Health System. Methods: The pilot study including two cancer care sites (started July 2017) was expanded to include two additional sites. The prior results were presented to 86 oncologists at all four cancer care sites to promote increased ACP activities for patients with metastatic cancer and/or refer those patients to palliative medicine (PM). ACP activities were defined as one of the following within the last year: 1) an advance directive (AD) or physician’s order for life sustaining therapy (POLST), 2) an ACP note and/or 3) a PM referral. Patients with metastatic cancer were identified by an EMR M1 designation by the oncologist from July 2021 to March 2022. Oncologists received monthly lists of patients with metastatic disease lacking ACP activities and quarterly scorecards with their ACP completion rate compared to their peers. Results: An average of 1302 unique patients with metastatic cancer were identified each month combined from all four sites. System wide ACP activities were unchanged from a baseline 51% in July 2021 to 53% in March 2022. One site representing, an average of 101 patients/month, increased ACP activities from 16% to 65%. Conclusions: This initiative increased ACP activities since July 2021 for patients with metastatic cancer at one of four sites. The remaining three sites, two of which were part of the pilot from 2017, showed a plateauing of ACP activities despite embedded PM providers, ACP education and monthly feedback to the providers. This may have been from a higher baseline and longer PM presence at those sites. The site showing improvement was given economic incentives to meet Cedars-Sinai priorities for ACP activities and started at a lower baseline, both of which may have contributed to the increase. Further improvement in ACP activities may occur with involvement of clinic reception, nursing and social work along with more broad economic incentive for ACP activities. This increase was primarily from ACP note completion of 53% (PM 18% and AD completion 10%).[Table: see text]

Identifying barriers to advance care plan completion among older adults

Advance care planning (ACP) is an important tool for preserving patient autonomy and benefits patients, families, and providers. ACP is underutilized throughout the United States, yet the factors contributing to this deficit are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of older individuals’ attitudes towards advance care planning and to characterize perceived barriers to ACP completion. A sample of 240 United States residents age 65-years and older were invited to complete a survey assessing their attitudes toward ACP through an online panel. Participants were administered a structured questionnaire comprised of scaled items that were derived from prior qualitative discussions about ACP with groups of seniors. An analysis of Likert scale responses was performed to identify common barriers underlying participants’ reluctance to complete advance care plans. One hundred and thirty (54%) respondents reported having completed an advance care plan, while 110 (46%) had not. Those who completed ACPs feel it is important to avoid burdening their families with difficult decisions and healthcare expenses by stating their preferences, a finding that is consistent with prior research. Among those without advance care plans, 53 (48%) reported they had heard of advance care planning before participating in the study. The most prevalent barriers were uncertainty about healthcare preferences and uncertainty about how to initiate advance care planning. External barriers such as inconvenience, time, and cost did not emerge as important barriers. Free-text responses provided additional context to respondents’ answers. The relatively low rates of advance care plan completion and awareness among older Americans illustrate a pressing need to expand ACP education. Additionally, participants’ responses indicate that a set of internal barriers inhibit older individuals from completing advance care plans. Understanding these barriers can guide patient-centered discussions of advance care planning across multiple clinical settings and inform community efforts to improve ACP access. In particular, helping patients formulate and articulate their healthcare preferences may help increase ACP uptake.

Occurrence of Advance Care Planning and Hospital Course in Patients Admitted for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) During the Pandemic.

IntroductionThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted the importance of understanding patients’ goals, values, and medical care preferences given the high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to examine rates of advance care planning (ACP) documentation along with hospital course differences in the absence or presence of ACP among hospitalized patients with COVID-19.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed at a single tertiary academic medical center. All adults admitted between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020, for COVID-19 were included. Demographics, ACP documentation rates, presence of ACP forms, palliative care consultation (PCC) rates, code status, and hospital outcome data were collected. Data were analyzed with multivariable analysis to identify predictors of ACP documentation.ResultsAmong 356 patients (mean age 60.0, 153 (43%) female), 97 (27.2%) had documented ACP and 20 (5.6%) had completed ACP forms. In patients with documented ACP, 52.4% (n = 55) de-escalated care to do-not-resuscitate (DNR)-limited or comfort measures. PCC occurred rarely (<8%), but 78% (n = 21) of those consulted de-escalated care. Being admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (OR = 11.1, 95% CI = 5.9-21.1), mechanical intubation (OR = 15.8, 95% CI = 7.4-32.1), and discharge location other than home (OR = 11.3, 95% CI = 5.7-22.7) were associated with ACP documentation.ConclusionsThis study found low ACP documentation and PCC rates in patients admitted for COVID-19. PCC and completion of ACP were associated with higher rates of care de-escalation. These results support the need for pro-active ACP and PCC for patients admitted for serious illnesses, like COVID-19, to improve goal-informed care.