Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia Research Articles

Can COVID-19 Increase Platelet in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia During the TPO-RA Administration? A Real-World Observational Study.

COVID-19 infection has brought new challenges to the treatment of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). In adult ITP patients, there have been no relevant reports exploring the incidence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of platelet elevation after COVID-19 infection. A total of 66 patients with previously diagnosed ITP from December 2022 to February 2023 in a single-center were collected and analyzed for this real-world clinical retrospective observational study. In the platelet count increased group (n = 19), 13 patients (68.4%) were using thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) treatment at the time of COVID-19 infection; the median platelet count was 52 (2-207) ×109/L at the last visit before infection and 108 (19-453) ×109/L at the first visit after infection. In the platelet count stable group (n = 19) and platelet count decreased group (n = 28), 9 (47.4%) and 8 (28.6%) patients were using TPO-RA at the time of infection, respectively. ITP patients treated with TPO-RA had a significantly higher risk of increased platelet count than those not treated with TPO-RA at the time of infection (platelet count increased group vs platelet count decreased group: OR: 5.745, p = 0.009; platelet count increased group vs the non-increased group: OR: 3.616, p = 0.031). In the platelet count increased group, the median platelet count at 6 months post-infection was 67 (14-235) × 109/L, which was significantly higher than the platelet level at the last visit before infection (p = 0.040). This study showed that some adult ITP patients had an increase in platelet count after COVID-19 infection, and this phenomenon was strongly associated with the use of TPO-RA at the time of infection. Although no thrombotic events were observed in this study, it reminds clinicians that they should be alert to the possibility of thrombotic events in the long-term management of adult ITP patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Management of Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Delphi-Based Consensus Recommendations.

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder related with increased destruction or/and impaired production of platelets. Diagnosis and management of ITP is challenging and require expertise and interpretation of international consensus reports and guidelines with national variations of availability. We aimed to assess the agreement of hematologists in Türkiye on certain aspects of both first line and second line management of patients with pITP. As a modified Delphi method, Turkish National ITP Working Group (14 steering committee members) founded under Turkish Society of Hematology (TSH) developed a 21-item questionnaire consisting of statements regarding diagnosis-first line and second line treatments of pITP and 107 adult Hematologists working either in university or state hospitals voted for their agreement or disagreement of the statements for two consequential rounds. Participants have reached consensus on the use of corticosteroids as first line treatment and with limited duration. Methylprednisolone was the choice of corticosteroids rather than dexamethasone. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin was not preferred in patients without bleeding. It was also agreed that thrombopoietin receptor antagonists (TPO-RA) or rituximab should be recommended as second-line treatment, and that splenectomy could be considered 12-24 months after diagnosis in chronic pITP patients. The optimization of the dose and duration of cortTPO-RAs in addition to corticosteroids is necessary to improve the management of patients with pITP.

Efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in the treatment of primary immune thrombocytopenia: real-world data from a single medical center

Objective: This study aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in the treatment of adult primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and evaluated the factors influencing its efficacy and side effects. Methods: A total of 198 patients with adult ITP who were admitted to Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between January 2018 and March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The efficacy of each starting dose of eltrombopag was evaluated, and adverse events were analyzed. The factors influencing efficacy were investigated, including sex, age, adult ITP type, platelet antibodies, and combined drug treatments. Results: Of the 198 patients, 70 males and 128 females with a median age of 45 years (18-88 years) were included; 130 (65.7%) had newly diagnosed adult ITP, 25 (12.6%) had persistent adult ITP, and 43 (21.7%) had chronic adult ITP. The bleeding event scores at baseline were assessed; 84.3% had scores of<4 and 15.7% had scores of ≥4. The eltrombopag response rate (initial response) at 6 weeks was 78.8% (complete response [CR]: 49.0%; CR1: 14.6%; CR2: 15.2%). The median response time to eltrombopag was 7 (7, 14) days. The initial response rates to 25, 50, and 75 mg eltrombopag were 74.1%, 85.9%, and 60.0%, respectively (P=0.031). The initial response rate to the 50 mg dose was significantly higher than that of the 25-mg and 75-mg doses. Two patients received 100 mg as the starting dose, and their initial response was 0. Regarding dose adjustment, 70.7% of the patients remained on the starting dose, 8.6% underwent dose adjustment to 50 mg, and 6.1% underwent dose adjustment to 75 mg. Another two patients underwent dose adjustment to 100 mg. After dose adjustment, the persistent response rates were 83.6%, 85.3%, and 85.7% for the 25-, 50-, and 75-mg doses, respectively, with no significant difference. After dose adjustment, the sustained efficacy rate for the 100-mg dose (4 patients) was 100.0%. After 6 weeks of treatment with eltrombopag, the overall bleeding score of patients with ITP decreased. The number of patients with a score of ≥4 decreased to 0, the number of patients with a score of<4 decreased, and there was no significant change in the number of patients with a score of 1-2. The most common adverse event associated with eltrombopag was impaired liver function (7.7%). No thrombosis events or other adverse events were observed. ITP type and number of megakaryocytes significantly affected the initial response to eltrombopag. The initial response rates to eltrombopag for newly diagnosed adult ITP, persistent adult ITP, and chronic adult ITP were 85.3%, 56.0%, and 76.2%, respectively (P=0.003). For megakaryocytes, the initial response rates were 61.8%, 87.1%, and 84.3% (P=0.009) for the decreased, normal, and increased megakaryocyte groups, respectively. Conclusion: Eltrombopag, as a second-line or higher treatment for adult ITP, has a rapid onset of action and good safety. The initial response rate is significantly higher with a dose of 50 mg than with a dose of 25 mg. Patients with newly diagnosed ITP and those with normal or increased megakaryocyte numbers have a higher initial response rate to eltrombopag.

Evaluation of vitamin D status in adult patients with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia.

It has been shown that 25-OH vitamin D not only preserves calcium and bone homeostasis but also has immunomodulatory effects. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between adult patients with recently diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and vitamin D levels. Retrospective technique was employed in this study. The associations between 25(OH)D value and platelet count, as well as the clinical symptoms of ITP upon diagnosis and 25(OH)D value, were our main findings. A total of 60 patients diagnosed and followed up in our clinic were included in the study. Forty-one patients (68.3%) were female and 19 (31.7%) were male. The median age of the patients was 52.5 (19-88). The median vitamin D level of all patients at diagnosis of ITP was 11.5 (3-86). There was no statistically significant difference between the patients divided into three groups according to their vitamin D levels, in terms of laboratory parameters. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical findings according to vitamin D status in ITP patients. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of relapse-free survival in all three groups (p = 0.71). In conclusion, in our study, no correlation was found between laboratory and clinical findings at diagnosis and vitamin D levels in adult ITP patients. Additional investigations, particularly randomized controlled trials, are required to examine the relationship between 25(OH)D and the incidence and severity of ITP.

The problem of immune thrombocytopenia refractory to both eltrombopag and romiplostim.

Immune thrombocytopenia refractory to multiple thrombopoietin receptor agonists remains a challenging clinical problem. This commentary discusses and contextualizes the recent report on this entity from Moulis and colleagues, and how to move forward with these patients. Commentary on: Moulis etal. Difficult-to-treat primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults: Prevalence and burden. Results from the CARMEN-France Registry. Br J Haematol 2024;204:1476-1482.

Prednisone vs high-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: a randomized trial

AbstractA debate exists regarding which type of corticosteroids (standard-dose prednisone [PDN] or high-dose dexamethasone [HD-DXM]) is the best first-line treatment for adult patients with newly diagnosed untreated primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP). An ad hoc study compared PDN with HD-DXM in newly diagnosed untreated patients with pITP (aged ≥18 but ≤80 years, platelet count of ≤20 or >20 but <50 × 109/L, and bleeding score of ≥8). Patients were randomised to receive PDN 1 mg/kg per day from days 0 to 28 (Arm A) or HD-DXM 40 mg per day for 4 days, every 14 days, for 3 consecutive courses (Arm B). Fifty-nine of 113 patients (52.2%) were randomized to Arm A and 54 of 113 (47.8%) to Arm B. In evaluable patients, total initial responses (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], minimal response [MR]) were 44 of 56 (78.57%) in Arm A and 46 of 49 (93.88%) in Arm B at days 42 and 46, respectively (P = 0.0284). Total final responses (at day 180 from initial response) were 26 of 43 (60.47%) in Arm A and 23 of 39 (58.97%) in Arm B (P = 0.8907). Total persistent responses (at 12 months from initial response) were 25 of 31 (80.65%) in Arm A and 20 of 36 (55.56%) in Arm B (P = 0.0292). Seven relapses occurred. Median follow-up was 44.4 months. Overall survival was 100% at 48 months, overall disease-free survival was 81.11% at 48 months from day 180. PDN and pulsed HD-DXM were well tolerated; HD-DXM allows effective initial responses but less long lasting than PDN. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00657410.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in adults in Kyrgyzstan: a two-center retrospective observational study

Introduction and Aim: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired thrombocytopenia characterized by a platelet count of 100x109/l and caused by immune-mediated destruction of platelets. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the first and subsequent lines of therapy for adult patients with ITP. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 172 patients with ITP and a mean age of 44.2±5.71 years at the time of diagnosis and/or who were treated for ITP at participating centers such as south and republican centers in Kyrgyzstan during the study period from 2015–2022. Analyzing patient medical records yielded detailed data on treatment strategies and results. Results: There was a significant difference in the mean number of platelets between clinical centers (26.2 versus 14.5×109 cells/l, p&lt;0.05), and the mean number of platelets at admission to the hospital was 17.1±1.84×109 cells/l. 113 (65.7%) had primary ITP, and the remaining 59 (34.3%) had secondary ITP. 35.6% of patients with secondary causes were infected (including those with Helicobacter pylori but not others). Conclusion: Patients with adult ITP can be effectively treated with conservative methods in 45.4–77.6% of cases. These treatments include prednisone, dexamethasone, and their combination with intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, and azathioprine.

A Phase 3 Study of Eltrombopag Vs. Standard First-Line Management for Newly Diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenia in Children: Trial in Progress Update

Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) causes low platelet counts, variable bleeding symptoms, and reductions in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Despite this, novel therapies for newly diagnosed ITP have not been introduced in over 30 years. Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), was FDA approved for children with chronic ITP in 2015. The use of eltrombopag for adults with newly diagnosed ITP has been described in two small single-center trials (Tripathi et al, Int J Hematol, 2014; Gόmez-Almaguer et al, Blood, 2014), and pediatric hematologists do use TPO-RAs off-label in some cases of newly diagnosed ITP (Neunert et al, Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2016). TPO-RAs may be an efficacious and more durable first-line therapy for children with newly diagnosed ITP who require treatment. This abstract provides a 4-year interval update on the Pediatric ITP Newly diagnosed patients Eltrombopag vs Standard therapy (PINES) trial in progress. Study Design and Methods: The PINES trial, NCT03939637, is an investigator-initiated prospective, open label, randomized, multi-center trial sponsored by the ITP Consortium of North America (ICON) and funded by Novartis. The primary objective is to determine if the proportion of patients with a platelet response, defined as ≥3 of 4 platelet counts &amp;gt;50 x10 9/L during weeks 6-12 without rescue treatment, is significantly greater in patients with newly diagnosed ITP treated with eltrombopag compared to those treated with standard first-line therapy. Patients (n=162) from 30 ICON centers (Figure) are randomized 2:1, stratified by age and treatment status, to receive the experimental treatment, eltrombopag, or investigator's choice of 3 standard first-line therapies: prednisone, intravenous immune globulin or anti-D globulin at standardized doses. Eligible patients are ages 1 to &amp;lt;18 with primary ITP, within 3 months of diagnosis, with platelet count &amp;lt;30 x10 9/L who require pharmacologic treatment from the perspective of the treating clinician. Baseline treatment status is 1) upfront treatment, or patients within 10 days of ITP diagnosis with no prior treatment, and 2) treatment failure, or patients previously managed with observation or a first-line standard agent. Patients are ineligible if they can be observed without medication or have severe bleeding. A one-sided z-test, at alpha=0.025, will be used to compare the proportion of patients who have a platelet response between the two treatment arms. All randomized patients will be analyzed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary objectives include treatment arm comparison of bleeding scores (WHO Bleeding Scale and Modified Buchanan Score), changes in HRQoL (measured by the Kids ITP Tool, Hockenberry Fatigue Scale, PROMIS, and Global Change Scale), and changes in percentage of CD4 +25 +Foxp3 + regulatory T (Treg) cells. Due to challenges related to recruitment and the logistics and safety of obtaining frequent assessments during the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary endpoint was re-defined in 2021 to what is considered a clinically equivalent definition of response, from ≥6 of 8 weekly to ≥3 of 4 biweekly platelet counts &amp;gt;50 x10 9/L during weeks 6-12. Baseline Characteristics: Since first site activation in 2019, 100 patients have been enrolled (Table). Subjects include 42 patients aged 1-&amp;lt;6 years, 34 patients aged 6-&amp;lt;12 years, and 24 patients aged 12-&amp;lt;18 years. Thirty-six patients received upfront treatment and 64 patients had treatment failure prior to enrollment. Median baseline platelet count at enrollment was 5 x10 9/L (range 1 - 28 x10 9/L). Median WHO Bleeding Scale at enrollment was 1 (range 0 - 3) and median modified Buchanan Overall Score was 3 (range 0 - 3). Baseline HRQoL surveys have been obtained for &amp;gt;80% of eligible subjects. Treg samples have been obtained for 95% of subjects, and 74% of subjects have consented to optional biology studies. Conclusion: Despite historical difficulty completing interventional trials in pediatric ITP and pandemic-related enrollment challenges, PINES trial enrollment is progressing successfully and will ultimately provide definitive data regarding the efficacy of eltrombopag in children with newly diagnosed ITP. There are no current data supporting the use of TPO-RAs for newly diagnosed ITP in children, or as monotherapy for newly diagnosed ITP in adults. Results from this trial therefore carry the potential to change management practices in ITP.

Interim Analysis of Treatment Satisfaction from a Prospective Phase 4 Study in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Subjects after Switching from Eltrombopag or Romiplostim to Avatrombopag

Background: Recently, the Thrombopoietin-Receptor Agonist (TPO-RA) Patient experience survey (TRAPeze) determined that the characteristics which influence preference towards TPO-RA treatments the most were the method of administration and drug-food interactions. Specifically, participants were more likely to select an oral tablet over a subcutaneous injection and a treatment without food restrictions rather than one with food restrictions (McDonald V, et al, 2021). A majority of patients in a real-world analysis who switched from eltrombopag (ELT) or romiplostim (ROMI) to avatrombopag (AVA) did so due to perceived convenience benefits (Al-Samkari H, et al, 2022). The ongoing AVA-ITP-401 prospective interventional study is evaluating treatment satisfaction and on-therapy convenience in patients immediately switching to AVA from either ELT or ROMI and aims to provide valuable patient-reported outcomes. Safety and platelet count (PC) response to AVA following a switch from the other two TPO-RAs are also being evaluated. In a separate abstract submission, the mean/median PCs are reported to either be improved or maintained with AVA treatment over 90 days. Methods: This is an interim analysis of a prospective, multi-center, open-label Phase 4 study being conducted in the US (NCT04638829) since March 2021. Subjects who have been receiving ELT or ROMI for ≥90 days prior to study entry are enrolled and immediately switched to AVA at a starting dose of 20 mg daily. Key inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years; subjects have been undergoing treatment for primary ITP with ELT or ROMI for ≥90 days prior to the screening visit; subjects have had a previous response to either ELT or ROMI. The primary endpoint is occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events. A key secondary endpoint is the change from baseline in each of the 4 domains of the self-administered Treatment Satisfaction Medication Questionnaire (TSQM) Version 1.4 (convenience, global satisfaction, effectiveness, and side effects) to Day 90 (D90) or End of Study (EOS). An increase in domain mean score indicates an increased patient preference to a given therapy in that domain. Clinic Visits were mandated per protocol at Days 15 (D15), 30 (D30), 60 (D60), and 90/End of Study (D90/EOS) with PCs obtained at each timepoint. The TSQM was assessed at baseline (BL), D30, and D90/EOS. Results: As of April 1, 2023, 51 patients were screened with 47 enrolled. 35 completed the study, 3 dropped out, and 6 are on-going. The mean age at enrollment was 58 years, the median (min,max) time since ITP diagnosis was 2.88 years (0.2,31.0), 60% were female, 72% were Caucasian, and 11% had a previous history of splenectomy. 62% of patients were switched to AVA from ELT (median prior treatment duration 42 weeks (range 12 - 442); median daily dose 50 mg) and 38% from ROMI (median prior treatment duration 81 weeks (range 12 - 468); median weekly dose ≤3 µg). Safety results will be reported when the study is complete. TSQM individual domain BL, D30, and D90/EOS mean values and mean percent change from BL following the switch from either ELT or ROMI to AVA are summarized in Table 1. In the Total Population, scores at BL in all four domains were generally high reflecting patient satisfaction to their prior therapy. Following the switch to AVA, however, there was measurable improvement in satisfaction across all domains-most pronounced in the effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction domains. This improvement began at D30 and was maintained through D90/EOS. The increase in patient-reported satisfaction was greater in ELT-switchers than with ROMI-switchers; however, improvement in satisfaction was observed by EOS across all four domains in the ROMI-switching population as well. Summary/Conclusion: Despite high patient satisfaction scores at BL from prior therapy (ELT or ROMI), patients reported higher satisfaction following a switch to AVA across all domains of the TSQM (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction) over 90 days. In a population of patients who were generally responding to TPO-RAs prior to a switch to AVA, mean/median PCs were also either improved or maintained with AVA treatment for the duration of the study (reported in a separate abstract submission), suggesting that some patients may experience sustained effectiveness paired with enhanced overall treatment satisfaction when switching from ELT or ROMI.

Interim Analysis of Platelet Response in a Prospective Phase 4 Study in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Subjects after Switching from Eltrombopag (ELT) or Romiplostim (ROMI) to Avatrombopag (AVA)

Background: Three thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) [eltrombopag, romiplostim, and avatrombopag] are currently approved in the United States (US) and Europe for the treatment of ITP in adult patients. ROMI is administered via injection whereas ELT and AVA are oral medications. Polyvalent cations significantly limit the bioavailability of ELT; therefore, patients must follow rigid dietary restrictions. AVA is taken with meals and does not have food-type or timing restrictions, aligning with reported patient preferences for ITP treatments. 1 A recent retrospective study of heavily pre-treated ITP patients at 4 large US tertiary care medical centers demonstrated that 91% of AVA patients who switched from ELT and 94% who switched from ROMI achieved a platelet response (platelet count (PC) ≥50 x 10 9/L) regardless of the reason for switch. 2 This study required a &amp;lt; 30-day gap between ELT or ROMI discontinuation and initiation of AVA. Platelet count response to AVA following an immediate switch from another TPO-RA has not been previously reported in a prospective study. The current study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immediately switching to AVA from other TPO-RAs as well as capture patient-reported outcomes of treatment satisfaction and convenience. Methods: This is an interim analysis of a prospective, multi-center, open-label Phase 4 study conducted in the US (NCT04638829). Subjects who have been receiving ELT or ROMI ≥90 days prior to study entry are enrolled and immediately switched to AVA. The main inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years; subjects have been undergoing treatment for primary ITP with ELT or ROMI for at least 90 days prior to the screening visit and have a desire to switch therapy; subjects have had a previous response to either ELT or ROMI, defined as at least 2 platelet counts ≥50×10 9/L. The primary endpoint is occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events. Clinic Visits were mandated per protocol at Baseline (BL), Days 15 (D15), 30 (D30), 60 (D60), and 90/End of Study (D90/EOS), and PCs were obtained at each timepoint. The interim analyses reported here evaluate the PC response to AVA following the switch from either ELT or ROMI. Results: As of April 1, 2023, 51 patients were screened and 47 enrolled. 35 completed the study, 3 dropped out, and 6 are on-going. The mean age at enrollment was 58 years, the median (min,max) time since ITP diagnosis was 2.88 years (0.2,31.0), 28/47 (60%) were female, 34/47 (72%) were Caucasian, and 5/47 (11%) had a previous history of splenectomy. 62% of patients were switched to AVA from ELT (median prior treatment duration 42 weeks (range 12 - 442 weeks); median daily dose 50 mg) and 38% from ROMI (median prior treatment duration 81 weeks (range 12 - 468 weeks); median weekly dose ≤3 µg). Baseline platelet counts revealed that patients were generally well-controlled on prior TPO-RA therapies when switched with a mean platelet count of 152×10 9/L and median platelet count of 130×10 9/L in the overall study population. Safety results will be reported when the study is complete. PC values for the Entire Population, as well as the ELT- and ROMI-switching subpopulations are summarized in Table 1. Median PC values over time are represented in Figure 1 for the Entire Population. For the Entire Population, after switching to AVA 20mg daily, there was an initial early increase in median PC from baseline noted on day 15, with median PC remaining well above 50 x10 9/L at each subsequent time point with less variability compared with day 15. ROMI-switched patients had a higher BL median PC than ELT-switchers (170 vs 76 x10 9/L).; median PC in patients switching from ELT rose from BL, whereas those switched from ROMI maintained a similar median PC throughout, with the minimum PC observed being similar to the minimum BL value (27 vs 24×10 9/L). Summary/Conclusion: In a population of patients who were generally responding to TPO-RAs prior to a switch to AVA, mean/median PCs were either improved or maintained with AVA treatment over 90 days. Importantly, patient satisfaction was also higher across each domain of the TSQM-9 with AVA treatment (convenience, global satisfaction, safety, and effectiveness) than with the prior TPO-RA (results reported in related abstract submission) suggesting that some patients may experience sustained effectiveness paired with enhanced overall treatment satisfaction when switching from ELT or ROMI.

Efficacy and Safety of Dapsone in Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia. Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial and of a Single-Arm, Emulated Trial in the Prospective, Multicenter Carmen-France Registry

Introduction: Adults treated for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) usually respond to 1 st-line therapy but the majority of them eventually relapse and need a second-line treatment to spare corticosteroids. Dapsone is an antibiotic drug with immunomodulatory properties that has shown some efficacy in various autoimmune diseases including ITP in several retrospective studies. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and the safety of dapsone given as second-line for primary ITP. Methods DAPS-ITP was a prospective multicenter randomized open-label controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of dapsone as a second-line option in adult ITP. Adult patients with primary and newly diagnosed or persistent ITP with previous transient response to corticosteroids and/or IVIg and a platelet count ≤30x10 9/L (or &amp;lt;50x10 9/L with bleeding manifestations) were eligible. After randomization (1/1 ratio), patients received either dapsone at 100 mg/day in combination with prednisone for 3 weeks (arm A) or just the 3 weeks course of prednisone (arm B). The primary outcome was the overall response rate (R + CR) in intention to treat at week 52 in the absence of any rescue therapy after week 6 and/or any other treatment for ITP over the study period. Complete response (CR) was defined by a platelet count &amp;gt;100x 10 9/L on dapsone (arm A) or off treatment (arm B) and response (R) by a platelet count &amp;gt;30x10 9/L with a least a doubling of the baseline count. We also conducted a single-arm, emulated trial in the prospective, multicenter CARMEN-France registry to provide real world evidence about the efficacy and the safety of dapsone in ITP. The CARMEN-France is a prospective, multicenter registry of adult patients with a new diagnosis of ITP in France. We selected the patients included in the registry between 2013 and 2022 with a primary ITP, exposed to dapsone, who met the inclusion criteria of the DAPS-ITP trial. We assessed the same outcomes than in the DAPS-ITP trial. Results In total, 93 patients (51% of females, median age 51 years [range: 33-66]) were included and randomized (46 in arm A and 47 in arm B) in DAPS-ITP trial. Median platelet count at inclusion was 25x 10 9/L [17-36], median ITP duration was 0.31 years [0.18-0.90]. Forty-two (arm A) and 45 patients (arm B) were followed up to week 52. In intention to treat (see figure), the overall response-rate (ORR) was respectively 8.70% [2.78%-18.93%] (arm A) and 4.26% [0.78%-12.81%] (arm B) at week 52 (primary outcome, p value = 0.78)). At week 24, the ORR was 25% [11.06%-41.78%] in arm A and 12.77% [5.18%-23.89%] in arm B (p value = 0.57). One death (intracranial hemorrhage) occurred in arm A, none in arm B; 36/46 patients (78%) from arm A had to discontinue prematurely dapsone, mostly for inefficacy with the need of other ITP treatment (n =10/36, 27.7%) or for various safety issues (n=26/36, 72%) including anemia ± gastro-intestinal manifestations (n=6); high methemoglobinemia (n=4); toxidermia (n=3) and others miscellaneous causes (n =13). In the CARMEN registry, 127 patients were exposed to dapsone. Among them, 50 met the inclusion criteria of the DAPS-ITP trial and had a 52-week follow-up after the initiation of dapsone. Patients characteristics were similar to those included in the DAPS-ITP trial. Three patients had no platelet count measured at W52 ± 4 weeks and were withdrawn from the primary outcome assessment. Overall, 5/47 achieved R or CR at W52 without any concomitant ITP treatment, resulting in an ORR of 10.6%; 95% CI: 3.5-23.1. At W24, 9/45 patients achieved R or CR (ORR: 20.0%; 95% CI: 9.6 -34.6; 5 patients had no platelet count at W24 ± 4 weeks in the real world). Seventeen (34.0%) experienced 19 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including 8 hemolytic anemia, 4 methemoglobinemia and 3 cutaneous rash. Twelve patients discontinued dapsone due to an ADR. Conclusion Among adult patients with primary ITP and a platelet count &amp;lt;30 x 10 9/L treated with dapsone as a second-line treatment, only a minority of patients achieved a sustained response at W52. The low rate of durable response may be at least in part due to an unexpectedly high rate of early discontinuation observed in the dapsone arm (DAPS-ITP trial) due to the occurrence of ADRs, some of which could have been easily manageable outside a clinical trial. Further studies are needed to better define who are the few patients who may still benefit from dapsone, in a cost-effectiveness perspective.

Fatigue and health-related quality of life in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a longitudinal assessment in China

ABSTRACT Background There is lacking studies of longitudinally assessment of fatigue and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among Chinese immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adults. We aimed to evaluate changes in fatigue and HRQoL and identify the associated factors. Methods Patients’ characteristics, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT-F) and the ITP-specific Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) scores at admission (T0), at discharge (T1), and three months after discharge (T2) were collected. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine changes over time. Results We included 175 patients. The mean score of FACIT-F at T0 was 37.2 and increased at T1 (39.0), while then decreased at T2 (34.7). Patients who were single, retired, had persistent ITP, splenomegaly had more severe fatigue, whereas those who had not received any prior treatment and had a bleeding score of 0 at admission had milder fatigue. The mean score of ITP-PAQ was 57.7 at T0, then gradually increased to 60.3 at T1 and 62.8 at T2. Patients with persistent ITP and those who have never received treatment for ITP have better HRQoL. Conclusion ITP adults’ fatigue and HRQoL were impaired. Patients’ fatigue improved at discharge but worsened at three months after discharge, while HRQoL gradually improved over time.

Avatrombopag Plus Fostamatinib Combination Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION Avatrombopag (AVA) is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), approved for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), as second line in subjects with chronic ITP unresponsive to other treatments. Global response rate of AVA is 69% with a mean duration of 12.4 weeks in its pivotal study 1. The combination of TPO-RA plus immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory drugs could optimize treatment results in ITP, addressing different pathophysiological pathways 2. Among the most widely used immunomodulatory drugs in these circumstances are steroids, azathioprine and mycophenolate. Fostamatinib (FOS) is a splenic tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor. FOS blocks the cascade of signals mediated by SYK after the activation of FcγRs, reducing macrophage activity, proliferation of B lymphocytes and production of antibodies 3. We present the experience in the combined use of AVA with fostamatinib in non-responders to said TPO-RA, an experience not reported to date. METHODS Retrospective, multicenter, international, observational, non-interventional study in patients diagnosed of primary ITP who have received treatment with AVA and FOS in combination between August 2022 and June 2023. We included patients who have not reached platelets &amp;gt;30x10e9/L after at least two weeks of treatment with daily 40mg of AVA, and FOS was prescribed in combination in these circumstances. Epidemiological characteristics, type of ITP, previous treatments received, starting dose, response, concomitant ITP treatment and toxicity are collected. ITP definition and response criteria are based on Provan et al 4: Response (R) as platelets 30-100x10e9/L and complete response (CR) as platelets &amp;gt; 100x10e9/L. Data are described in percentages for the categorical variables and in medians and ranges for the quantitative ones. RESULTS In the period of time evaluated, a total of 55 patients received treatment with AVA in Spain and Norway. The Norwegian data was acquired from the Norwegian ITP registry. In 16 of 55 patients (29%), there was no response after 2 or more weeks with AVA 280 mg weekly. In 6 of these patients, FOS was combined with AVA at a dose of 280mg weekly. Table 1 describes the characteristics of the 6 patients treated with the combination. Median time from initiation of AVA to combination with FOS was 14 days (Range: 14-21 days). The overall response of the combination was 100% (1 R, 5 CR). Median time to R was 25 days and to CR 31 days. Table 2 describes the characteristics of each patient's response. With a median follow-up from the start to last follow up of treatment in combination was 212 days (Range: 45-313 days), there was no relapse. Tapering of AVA and/or FOS was attempted in 5 patients by reducing the dose of FOS in 1 patient and the dose of AVA in 4. In patients 1 and 4, AVA was stopped, but this resulted in drop in the platelets counts. CR was achieved after reintroduction AVA in combination. With regard to toxicity, in the 6 patients treated with the combination AVA plus FOS, only two adverse events were described, both non-serious. One case of headache encountered with the use of AVA, before the initiation of FOS. The other event, was WHO grade 2 liver toxicity attributed to AVA. Hypertransaminasaemia was resolved after the interruption of avatrombopag for 6 days and reduction of AVA from 140mg to 60mg weekly. CONCLUSIONS In subjects with a lack of response to thrombopoietin analogues, the combination with immunosuppressants is an alternative to consider. The combination of avatrombopag and fostamatinib has been shown to be effective and safe, although longer series are needed to support these data. Bibliography 1. Jurczak W, Chojnowski K, Mayer J, et al. Phase 3 randomised study of avatrombopag, a novel thrombopoietin receptor agonist for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2018;183(3):479-490. 2. Arai Y, Jo T, Matsui H, et al. Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Haematologica. 2018;103(1):163-171. 3. Bussel J, Arnold DM, Grossbard E, et al. Fostamatinib for the treatment of adult persistent and chronic immune thrombocytopenia: Results of two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(7):921-930. 4. Provan D, Arnold DM, Bussel JB, et al Updated international consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2019;3(22):3780-3817

Good Prognosis of Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia in a Provincial Hospital

Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease resulting from platelet destruction and impaired platelet production. Some patients experience relapses or refractoriness after corticosteroid treatment, necessitating second-line treatments. The majority of adult ITP cases become chronic or relapsing. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical course and identify factors related to sustained responses to treatment in patients with ITP. Methods: This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2022 at Trang Hospital, Trang Province, Thailand. Results: A total of 125 newly diagnosed ITP patients were enrolled, with an average follow-up duration of 48.49 ± 41.49 (mean ± SD) months. The average age was 42.34 ± 18.44 years, the average platelet count was 11.66 ± 14.39 x 10 9 /L, and the average platelet recovery time after treatment was 43.14 ± 101.32 days. The mean response duration after the first-line treatment was 25.99 ± 29.39 months. The characteristics of the patients were as follows: age below 60 years (78.4%), female sex (75.2%), pregnancy (1.6%), primary ITP (67.2%), secondary ITP (32.8%), bleeding symptoms (54.4%), platelet count &amp;lt;10 x 10 9 /L (64%), platelet count 10-30 x 10 9 /L (28.8%), platelet count 30-50 x 10 9 /L (5.6%), platelet count &amp;gt;50 x 10 9 /L (1.6%), splenectomy (4%), observation only (2.4%), loss to follow-up (10.4%), and death (4%). The most common cause of secondary ITP was systemic lupus erythematosus (63%). The first-line treatment consisted of dexamethasone (70.4%), prednisolone (23.2%), and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (4%). The clinical courses were as follows: recovery within 3 months in 68.8%, persistence in 13.6%, and chronic ITP in 17.6%. The sustained responses to corticosteroid treatment at 6 months included complete response (CR) (58.4%) and response (R) (9.6%), as shown in Table 1. Second-line treatments were required in 22.4% of cases, including colchicine (60.7%), azathioprine (35.7%), cyclophosphamide (25%), dapsone (17.8%), vincristine (10.7%), mycophenolate mofetil (7.1%), cyclosporine (3.5%), and/or eltrombopag (3.5%). The sustained responses to second-line treatments at 6 months were CR in 12% and R in 8.8%. Female sex ( P-value 0.007) and primary ITP ( P-value 0.046) were significantly associated with the sustained response (CR+R) to corticosteroids at 6 months. Secondary ITP ( P-value 0.036) was also associated with the sustained response (CR+R) to second-line treatments at 6 months (Table 2). Conclusions: This study reveals a favorable prognosis for ITP, with a majority of patients showing sustained response (CR+R), which differs from findings in studies conducted at referral centers. Female patients and those with primary ITP are more likely to respond. Further confirmation is needed through a large prospective cohort study in community hospitals.

Real-World Evidence of Avatrombopag for the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia Intolerant or Ineffective to Eltrombopag/Hetrombopag

Abstract Objectives: Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Although avatrombopag has been confirmed to achieve platelet response for chronic ITP in clinical trials, and it has no hepatotoxicity unlike eltrombopag or hetrombopag, there is still a lack of real-world research on the application of avatrombopag in Chinese ITP patients. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of avatrombopag in ITP treatment in a real-world clinical practice. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we enrolled consecutive cohorts of 50 adult ITP patients who received avatrombopag in two centers from January 2021 to March 2023. The median duration of follow-up of these patients was 16.5 months (range from 3.8 to 25.4 months). Results: The median age of patients was 44 years when they received the treatment of avatrombopag, and 42% of them were males. Most patients (n=45) had a persistent (3-12 months) or chronic course (more than 12 months) of ITP. The patients in our study were heavily treated, who received a median of 4 kinds of ITP treatment prior to avatrombopag. The baseline TPO levels was 88.1 (110.2±84.5) pg/ml. Based on the reasons for choosing avatrombopag, these patients were divided into eltrombopag/hetrombopag intolerance group (IG, n=14) and eltrombopag/hetrombopag unresponsive group (UG, n=36). The reasons for choosing avatrombopag in IG included active hepatitis B (n=4), hepatic insufficiency before using TPO-RA (n= 6), autoimmune hepatitis (n=1), hepatic lesion after using eltrombopag (n=2), and myelofibrosis after using eltrombopag (n=1). Compared with UG, more patients had a history of liver disease (active Hepatitis B and autoimmune liver diseases, P=0.003). The median platelet count before avatrombopag was 9 × 10 9/L. The median duration of avatrombopag treatment was 12 weeks and the median weekly dose of avatrombopag was 140 mg. Among the total cohort, platelet response (platelet count ≥30 × 10 9 /L) was achieved in 44/50 (88%) and complete platelet response (platelet count ≥100 × 10 9 /L) was seen in 35/50 patients (70%) after using avatrombopag. The median time of platelets rising above 30 × 10 9 /L was 7 days, while it was 8 days when platelet count exceeded 50 × 10 9 /L. Nearly half patients (47%) were able to discontinue more than 1 concomitant ITP medication after avatrombopag treatment. Besides, most patients (74%) in our study tapered off or withdrew steroids. There were no significant differences in baseline platelet count, 30-day response rate, the maximum effective dose of avatrombopag and duration of avatrombopag between IG and UG. So far, 19 patients achieved platelet response were still taking avatrombopag, and 58% of them maintained platelet count above 100× 10 9 /L. Meanwhile, 31 patients discontinued avatrombopag.The reasons for withdrawal of drug included adverse events (n=2), sustained remission in ITP (n=8), no/lose response to avatrombopag (n=10), and unablity to afford the cost consistently (n=11). Avatrombopag was well tolerated in most patients, even those suffered from hepatic insufficiency and/or myelofibrosis after other TPO-RA. However, two cases had thrombosis and two patients reported mild fatigue. Conclusion: In the ITP population, avatrombopag was effective and safe, especially for those intolerant or ineffective to eltrombopag/hetrombopag. However, most patients with ITP were not able to afford the long-term usage of avatrombopag in China.

Tacrolimus and Danazol Combination As a Second-Line Therapeutic Strategy for Steroid-Resistant or Relapsed Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an important health concern as a severe autoimmune bleeding disorder characterized by low platelet counts and an increased risk of bleeding. Traditionally, the first-line treatment for ITP involves glucocorticoids. However, a substantial number of patients develop resistance or relapse within the first year of treatment, presenting a formidable challenge for medical practitioners. The consequences of prolonged glucocorticoid therapy, such as severe adverse effects, further necessitate the exploration of alternative, more effective, and safer treatments. In recent years, tacrolimus, a potent calcineurin inhibitor, has emerged as a potential candidate for managing ITP. It has shown promising efficacy against anti-platelet antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia, thus expanding the therapeutic options for resistant or relapsed ITP patients. Our previous work ( BJH 2022) also highlighted the potential of tacrolimus in suppressing the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes and the apoptosis of MSCs-C+ cells both in vivo and in vitro. This research formed a solid foundation for further investigation into the roles of tacrolimus in ITP. Building on this background, our current research focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of combining tacrolimus and danazol as a second-line therapy for patients with steroid-resistant or relapsed ITP. This study was designed to provide a comprehensive understanding of this therapeutic combination, which could pave the way for optimized treatment regimens for ITP, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Methods: This phase 2, randomized, open-label trial involved adult ITP patients demonstrating drug resistance or relapse from seven tertiary medical centers across China. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 12-week treatment of either tacrolimus (initial dose 0.03 mg/kg/d, maintaining a blood concentration between 3-5 ng/mL) combined with danazol (200 mg bid) or monotherapy with danazol (200 mg bid). The primary endpoint entailed a 6-month sustained response, denoted by maintaining platelet counts &amp;gt; 50×10^9/L without additional ITP-modifying therapies at the 6-month follow-up. Secondary endpoints comprised an initial response, response duration, bleeding scores, and adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials (NCT05471050). Results: The study enrolled 90 steroid-resistant or relapsed ITP patients, with 43 assigned to the tacrolimus plus danazol group and 47 to the danazol monotherapy group. The participants in the combination group had a median age of 48 years (range: 30-53), and in the monotherapy group, it was 40 years (range: 28-51). Both groups had a marginally higher proportion of female participants. The median primary ITP duration was two months for both groups. Baseline bleeding scores and bleeding or platelet transfusion instances at enrollment were similar across groups. The results showed a promising improvement in the patient response. The tacrolimus plus danazol group showed a significantly higher 6-month sustained response rate (53%, n=23) than the danazol group (30%, n=14) (odds ratio: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.16-6.13, p=0.032). While there was no significant difference in the response times across the groups, the combination group attained a significantly higher peak platelet count (90 ×10^9/L) than the monotherapy group (70 ×10^9/L) (p=0.031). This suggests that the addition of tacrolimus to the therapy can significantly boost the platelet count, potentially improving the clinical outcomes for the patients. Response durations were comparable in both groups, indicating that the addition of tacrolimus did not negatively impact the duration of response. Last, treatment was well-tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 events or treatment-related deaths reported in both groups. Conclusions: The tacrolimus and danazol combination emerges as a promising second-line treatment for steroid-resistant or relapsed ITP. This regimen demonstrated a higher 6-month sustained response rate and peak platelet count compared to danazol monotherapy, substantiating its potential role as a novel treatment strategy for adult ITP patients.

Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Receiving TPO-RA : Multicenter Mixed-Design Study

Introduction The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), such as Avatrombopag (AVA), Eltrombopag (ELT), and Romiplostim (ROM), have, in recent years, changed ITP treatment, showing that there is both increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production in ITP. ELT and AVA are oral drugs, while ROM is subcutaneous, and studies have shown that absorption of ELT can be affected by meals. Thus, for optimum absorption, patients are counseled to take it on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal and at least 2 hours before and 4 hours after calcium-containing meals. However, in Muslim countries where the 16/8 type of intermittent fasting is practiced by religion, the scheduling of drug consumption can be affected. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of fasting on patients with ITP receiving different Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) brands. Methods A Multicenter, mixed design study was performed in which we interviewed Muslim patients (n = 100) who were 18 years of age or older in Qatar, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia and fasted Ramadan while receiving TPO-RA treatment between the years of 2015 and 2023. Clinical and biological parameters are recorded using using a standardized patient form. Fasting status was confirmed by a telephone call to each patient. Patients' responses were retrospectively evaluated before, during, and after Ramadan. A statistically significant result was identified with a P-value of &amp;lt; 0.05. Bleeding tendency was also evaluated as either no bleeding, minor cutaneous and mucosal bleeding, or life-threatening bleeding involving major organs (i.e., central nervous system, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary). Results A hundred patients were identified who matched our inclusion criteria for this study. Platelet responses were different among the 3 products, and statistical significance was attributed to the product's compromised efficacy due to disturbed meal schedules and decreased absorption. For patients on AVA, the drug efficacy was not directly affected by meal schedule and absorption but instead was affected by patient compliance. The mean platelet count before Ramadan was estimated at 146.11 ± 111.76, while during Ramadan it dropped to 131.7 ± 107.6. Whereas when comparing platelets before and after Ramadan, there was an insignificant difference 146.11 ± 111.76 vs. 134.17 ± 60.9. For patients on ELT, the mean platelet count before Ramadan was estimated at 120.02 ± 59.7, while during Ramadan it dropped to 100.8 ± 68.16. Whereas when comparing platelets before and after Ramadan, there was an insignificant difference 120.02 ± 59.7 vs. 136.04 ± 74.86. For patients on ROM, the mean platelet count before Ramadan was estimated at 122.68 ± 80.57, while during Ramadan it was 130.94 ± 84.96. Whereas when comparing platelets before and after Ramadan, there was an insignificant difference but an increase in platelet count 122.68 ± 80.57 vs 212.0 ± 113.72. Only 3% (3 patients on ELT) of the patients fasting during Ramadan experienced bleeding episodes. 2 of which experienced minor bleeding (ecchymosis and gingival bleeding), and 1 had major bleeding episodes (Lt. hemorrhagic infarction). 47% of the patients experienced a complete response (PLT&amp;gt;100x10 9) among the three products, and 17% experienced a partial response (PLT 51-100x10 9) 36.6% of the patients on AVA showed a complete response, 46.15% of patients on ELT, and 63.15% of patients on ROM. Conclusion TPO-RAs achieve target platelet counts in adult ITP patients. However, the absorption of ELT is highly affected by food consumption, and thus it is critical to adhere to the instructions given on how the dose should be adjusted and consumed on an empty stomach. AVA absorption didn't show compromise with food consumption, and its efficacy may depend only on patient's compliance. ROM showed better adherence to the medication schedule compared to ELT, contributing to its subcutaneous form and a tailored home visit program given weekly by trained nurses, enhancing patient compliance. The general tolerability and efficacy of TPO-RAs may be reflected on incidence of no major bleeding and the better efficacy of AVA and ROM, which are not affected by fasting.

The Combination of Iguratimod and Danazol Versus Danazol As a Treatment of Corticosteroid-Resistant/Relapse Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-Label Trial

Introduction: The treatment of choice in corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is still controversial due to the unclear mechanism and unpredictable efficacy of available therapies. The small molecule compound iguratimod is widely used as a novel antirheumatic drug to treat several autoimmune diseases. According to studies involving ITP mice, iguratimod may represent a new approach for the prevention and treatment of anti-platelet antibody-mediated ITP by modulating T-cell differentiation. Since iguratimod and danazol share disparate mechanisms in treating ITP, a combination of iguratimod and danazol may work synergistically based on a “double-hit” mechanism targeting both platelet production and destruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iguratimod and danazol versus danazol alone in patients with corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed primary immune thrombocytopenia. Methods: Across seven tertiary medical centers in China, adult ITP patients from this randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label trial participated. Eligible corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed ITP patients with a platelet count &amp;lt;30×10 9/L or bleeding symptoms at enrollment were randomlyallocated by masked statisticians in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral iguratimod at 25 mg twice daily plus oral danazol at 200 mg twice daily or oral danazol monotherapy at 200 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. The group assignment was not masked for clinicians or patients. Following the first eight weeks of treatment, patients were assessed every two weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was a 6-month sustained response (SR), defined as a platelet count of 30×10 9/L or more and at least a doubling of the baseline platelet count (partial response) or a platelet count of 100×10 9/L or more (complete response) and the absence of bleeding without rescue medication. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05281068). Results: From September 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, a total of 106 patients were screened for eligibility; 35 were excluded, and 71 were randomly assigned: 37 to the iguratimod plus danazol group and 34 to the danazol group. The median age of the patients was 41 years, and 69.0% (49/71) of them were females. All patients enrolled failed to respond to the first-line treatment with corticosteroids, and 21 (29.6%) of all patients had received three or more therapies. The data cutoff for the analyses was July 1, 2023. The median follow-up was 14 months (IQR 11-15) in the iguratimod plus danazol group and 12.5 months (11-15) in the danazol group. Six-month follow-up results showed that iguratimod plus danazol was more likely to produce SR than danazol alone (20 [54.1%] of 37 vs. 9 [26.5%] of 34; odds ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.22-2.70, p = 0.003). The combination group had 25 (67.6%) patients with at least one response (overall response), and 13 (35.1%) patients had a complete response by the end of the follow-up; whereas 15 (44.1%) of 34 patients in the monotherapy group had an overall response, and three (8.8%) had a complete response. A target platelet count of 30×10 9/L was achieved in 18 (48.6%) of 37 patients given iguratimod plus danazol after 4 weeks and five (14.7%) of 34 patients given danazol monotherapy, indicating that the combination therapy significantly increased the initial response rate ( p = 0.002). Both groups experienced similar serious adverse events (AEs), rescue treatment, and treatment side effects, and all patients tolerated the treatment well, without any grade 4 AEs or treatment-related deaths reported. Conclusions: Patients with corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed ITP responds well to iguratimod plus danazol. This regimen achieved a rapid and long-lasting response. It is necessary to conduct further studies to determine the optimal dosage and a variety of combination therapies using several immune-suppressing agents, including iguratimod, to achieve a sustained response in patients with corticosteroid-resistant or relapsed ITP.

Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with Primary ITP Compared with Population Norms: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Data from Norwegian ITP Registry

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by thrombocytopenia and varying grades of bleeding manifestations. Many patients develop a fear of bleeding, which can impact their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition, often necessary lifestyle adjustments as well as treatment-related side effects may further reduce HRQoL. Aims: to estimate HRQoL in adult patients diagnosed with ITP and to compare their HRQoL to that of the general population using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire. Methods: Data from the Norwegian ITP (NOR-ITP) Registry was used. Adult ITP patients registered in NOR-ITP from Dec 2016 to May 2023 were included in this study. Patients included in NOR-ITP complete the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, when included in the registry and then annually as part of their scheduled follow-up. In patients who had completed several EQ-5D-3L questionnaires, the most recent one was used. The age-adjusted Norwegian EQ-5D-3L populations norms were used as reference values for Index and VAS scores. Missing data were replaced using multiple imputation. Results: Median (IQR) age of 247 patients was 57 years (34); M:F ratio = 1:1.5. ITP was newly diagnosed in 18 (7%), persistent in 14 (6%), and chronic in 215 (87%) patients. Platelet count was &amp;gt;50*10 9/L in 166 (67%) patients, between 31 and 50*10 9/L in 15 (6%), and &amp;lt; 30*10 9/L in 18 (7%), unknown for 19% (48). Thirty-nine (16%) patients were never treated for ITP, 80 (32%) patients had remission induced by glucocorticoids +/- IVIGs, and 128 (52%) were treated with second-line agents. Ongoing treatment was an immunosuppressive agent (i.e. glucocorticoids +/- IVIGs, rituximab (received during the last 3 months), azathioprine, cyclosporine-A, mycophenolate mofetil) in 43 (17%) patients, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist in 42 (17%) patients, while 162 (66%) were off-ttraetment. Median time from diagnosis of ITP to most recent EQ-5D questionnaire was 4 (10) years. Figure1a displays the frequency of reported problems (levels 2 and 3) in ITP patients compared to the population norms. ITP patients reported significantly more problems in 4 out of 5 domains. EQ-5D index score was significantly lower in ITP patients compared to the general population [Mean (SD) = 0.790 (0.23) vs 0.830 ([0.041); p-value 0.007]. Likewise, we found VAS to be significantly lower in ITP patients compared to the general population [Mean (SD) = 70.82 (21.09) vs 77.32 (5.554); p-value 0.0001). Within the ITP cohort, we found significantly lower VAS scores in ITP patients receiving ongoing treatment compared to those off treatment (p-value 0.01), as shown in figure1b. However, no significant difference was found concerning Index scores when comparing patients with ongoing to off-treatment. Comparing index scores and VAS according to platelet count category (&amp;lt;30; 31-50; &amp;gt;50*109/L) and the phase of ITP did not reveal any significant differences. Conclusion: This study is the first to evaluate HR-QoL using EQ-5D in a well-characterized cohort of patients with ITP. In line with existing evidence, using other HRQoL instruments, we found significantly reduced HRQoL in ITP patients compared to the general population. ITP patients receiving ongoing treatment had worse HRQoL compared to those off-treatment. Limitations of this study are the the long time period between diagnosis and completing the questionnaire, the observational and retrospective study design, and the lack of predictors for HRQoL.

Short-Term Efficacy of Combination Therapy with Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) and Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-Ra) in Patients with Severe Immune Thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Bleeding manifestations in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) range from mild skin bruises to lifethreatening intracranial hemorrhage. When the risk of bleeding is becoming high or life-threatening bleeding events occurs, we often use a combination of therapies to rapidly raise platelets to the safe range, including platelet transfusions, high-dose glucocorticoid, and intravenous immunoglobulins. Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-Ra) are two kinds of thrombopoietic drugs commonly used in China. In patients with severe ITP refractory to glucocorticoids, we lack experience with the use of rh-TPO and TPO-Ra in this emergency situation. Patients and methods： We included ITP patients with platelets &amp;lt;10*10 9/L and bleeding symptoms requiring treatment, who were refractory to glucocorticoids and used thrombopoietic drugs. The bleeding score was calculated with reference to the Chinese guidelines for adult ITP. The patients were divided into three groups according to the medication used: rh-TPO group(rh-TPO 30000IU Qd), TPO-Ra group(Eltrombopag 25mg-75mg/d or Avatrombopag 2.5mg-7.5mg/d or Hetrombopagolamine 20mg-60mg/d), and rh-TPO+TPO-Ra group(combination of two drugs at the same dosage). The platelet count should be rechecked every 1-2 days during the treatment. Platelet transfusion and hemostatic drugs can be used as needed. According to the standardized and international criteria, and taking into account the characteristics of this study, platelet counts were classified as short-term Complete Response(sCR), short-term Response(sR), and short-term No Response (sNR), based on the highest value of platelet counts from the start of treatment to the time of hospital discharge, short-term Overall Response(sOR)=sCR+sR. The three groups were compared the effective time(defined as the time to first sCR/sR after treatment) , peak platelet count after treatment, time to peak platelet count after treatment and other short-term efficacy indicators. Results Nineteen patients were include in this study, with 68.4% (13/19) was female. The median age was 58 years [range 17-79]. 15.8%(3/19) were newly diagnosed with ITP, 10.5%(2/19) had persistent ITP, and 73.7%(14/19) had chronic ITP. All patients were treated with glucocorticoids prior to this treatment, but they had a poor response. The median platelet count was 3*10 9/L [range 1-9] and the median bleeding score was 4 [range 2-9] before treatment. The common bleeding sites were skin ecchymosis and oral mucous membrane hemorrhage in 100%(19/19)and 47.3%(9/19), respectively. Severe bleeding symptoms were the manifestation in 3 cases: including 2 heavy menstrual flow and 1 hemoptysis and gastrointestinal. 100%(19/19) achieved a sOR and 31.6%(6/19) achieved a sCR. The median bleeding score was 0[0-2] after treatment and none had active bleeding symptoms. Platelet transfusion and hemostatic drugs were administered to all patients. Further details are provided in Table 1. Among 19 patients, 7(36.8%) used rh-TPO alone, 6(31.6%) TPO-Ra alone and 6(31.6%) used rh-TPO+TPO-Ra. There was no statistically significant difference in Clinical characteristics, including ages, gender, platelet counts and bleeding score among the three groups of patients before treatment (P=0.727, 0.594, 0.719, 0.299). In terms of treatment efficacy, we were unable to perform a statistical analysis of sOR rates because all three groups reached 100%. The sCR and the peak platelet count after treatment of rhTPO+TPO-Ra group was higher than the other two groups, 28.6%(2/7), 16.7%(1/6) and 50%(3/6) of patients achieved sCR respectively, the peak platelet counts after treatment in the three groups were 62*10 9/L, 72*10 9/L, 79.5*10 9/L respectively in this treatment, but there was no statistically significant difference (P=0.425，0.924). In addition, the effective time and time to peak platelet count after treatment of the three group are also no statistically significant difference(p=0.692,0.505). Further details are provided in Table 2. Conclusion This retrospective study suggests that the patients with severe ITP who were refractory to glucocorticoids, the use of rh-TPO and TPO-Ra may rapidly increase to safe ranges, but the combination is not necessary.