Adult Herring Gulls Larus Argentatus Research Articles

Individual differences in foraging site fidelity are not related to time‐activity budgets in Herring Gulls

Many populations consist of individuals that differ consistently in their foraging behaviour through resource or foraging site selection. Foraging site fidelity has been reported in several seabird species as a common phenomenon. It is considered especially beneficial in spatially and/or temporally predictable environments in which fidelity is thought to increase energy intake, thereby affecting time‐energy budgets. However, the consequences for activity and energy budget have not been adequately tested. In this paper, we studied the consequences of fine‐scale foraging site fidelity in adult Herring Gulls Larus argentatus in a highly predictable foraging environment with distinct foraging patches. We measured their time‐activity budgets using GPS tracking and tri‐axial acceleration measurements, which also made it possible to estimate energy expenditure. Individual variation in foraging site fidelity was high, some individuals spending most of their time on a single foraging patch and others spending the same amount of time in up to 21 patches. While time and activity budgets differed between individuals, we found no clear relationship with foraging site fidelity. We did find a relationship between the size of the birds and the level of site fidelity; faithful birds tend to have a larger body size. Although differences in foraging time and habitat use between individuals could play a role in the results of the current study, short‐term consequences of variation in foraging site fidelity within a population remain elusive, even when focusing on individuals with a similar foraging specialization (Blue Mussels Mytilus edulis). Studying individuals over multiple years and under varying environmental conditions may provide better insight into the consequences and plasticity of foraging site fidelity.

Seasonal changes in the preen wax composition of the Herring gull Larus argentatus

The preen gland produces oily secretion, which smeared onto a bird’s plumage improves its maintenance. The main components of the secretion are waxes, and its composition often changes during the year. The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the chemical composition of preen waxes in adult herring gulls Larus argentatus, captured in Poland in winter and in the breeding season. Preen gland secretions of herring gulls consist of monoester waxes, composed of about 29 saturated C7–C16 fatty acids and about 51 saturated C11–C20 alcohols. Unbranched-octanoic acid and n-hexadecanol dominated fatty acid and alcohol fractions, respectively, but 2-methyl-branched compounds were numerous in all individuals. The chemical compositions of fatty acids and alcohols differ between winter and the breeding season. In breeding gulls, 2-monomethyl-branched fatty acids were lower in content or could not be found, contrary to herring gulls in winter, where 2-monomethyl-substituted fatty acids were the second most abundant among all the fatty acids. Breeding gulls had also a higher content of n-octanoic acid and n-hexadecanol and a lower content of 2,6- and 2,8-dimethyl-substituted fatty acids than individuals caught during the winter. Differences in fatty acid composition were greater in breeding males, which incubate more often at night than breeding females. Hence, chemical changes in the preen wax composition in males may have evolved as additional nocturnal protection against mammalian predators which use olfaction to detect their prey and which are more active at night; however, this needs to be tested. Olfactory-based mate recognition in the colony also cannot be excluded at this stage of experimentation.

Intermittent breeding in the Herring GullLarus argentatusand the Lesser Black‐backed GullLarus fuscus

Thirty‐three percent and 37% of adult Herring GullsLarus argentatusand 34% and 40% of adult Lesser Black‐backed GullsLarus fuscus, all with some previous breeding experience, failed to breed in 1993 and 1994, respectively. About half of these intermittent breeders of both species failed to breed in both years. Common amongst the intermittent breeders were smaller individuals, birds with low survival chances and relatively unsuccessful breeders.