The utility of operating room extubation (ORE) following cardiac surgery over fast-track extubation within six hours (FTE) remains contested. We hypothesized ORE would be associated with equivalent rates of morbidity and mortality, relative to FTE. Patients undergoing non-emergent cardiac surgery were identified in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between July 2017 and December 2022. Only procedures with STS risk models were included. Risk-adjusted outcomes of ORE and FTE were compared via observed-to-expected ratios with 95% confidence intervals [O/E (95%CI)] aggregated over all procedure types, and ORE versus FTE adjusted odds ratio [AOR(95%CI)] specific to each procedure type using multivariable logistic regression. Analyzed outcomes were operative mortality, prolonged LOS, composite reoperation for bleeding and reintubation, and composite morbidity and mortality. The study population of 669,099 patients across 1,069 hospitals included 36,298 ORE patients in 296 hospitals. Risk-adjusted analyses found that ORE was associated with statistically similar or better results across each of the four outcomes and procedure sub-types. Notably, rates of postoperative mortality were significantly lower in ORE patients undergoing CABG (OR: 0.54 (95% CI:0.46-0.65)), AVR (OR:0.43 (95% CI:0.24-0.77)), and MVR (OR 0.48 (95% CI:0.26-0.89)). Extubation in the OR was shown to be safe and effective in a selected patient population and may be associated with superior outcomes in coronary artery bypass, aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair. These national data appear to confirm institutional experiences regarding the potential benefit of OR extubation. Further refinement of optimal populations may justify randomized investigation.