In order to study the dynamic adsorption process of water vapor in the pore structure of different coal samples (YJL for lignite, SEK for bituminous coal and BJ for anthracite). The pore structure characteristics of the three coal samples were analyzed by mercuric pressure method, liquid nitrogen adsorption method and infrared spectroscopy. Further, the water vapor adsorption capacity of the three coal samples under different humidity conditions was determined by dynamic water vapor sorption (DVS) experiments. In addition, the monolayer adsorption and multilayer adsorption at different humidity were calculated using the Dent model. The results showed that YJL had the largest surface pore volume and oxygen functional group parameter (IO = 12.41), and its water vapor adsorption capacity was also the highest. However, under high humidity conditions, the presence of a large number of pore throats in the YJL coal samples hindered multilayer adsorption, resulting in a water vapor adsorption percentage of only 18.07 %. On the other hand, SEK has a small oxygen functional group parameter (IO = 5.81), poor pore connectivity, and a certain pore throat structure, resulting in a low water vapor adsorption capacity of SEK coal samples, with a water vapor adsorption proportion of only 23.76 %. BJ coal has a large pore volume and a large number of oxygen functional groups on the surface (IO = 8.84), which has a good pore connectivity and the least number of pore throats structure, resulting in a water vapor adsorption ratio is higher at 87.38 %. On this basis, cylindrical and wedge-shaped pore models of coal samples were constructed, and molecular dynamics simulations were carried out to investigate the adsorption characteristics of water vapor in these pore models. The results show that the adsorption process of water molecules in coal develops continuously with “initial-water chain-water bridge-water lock”. By summarizing and analyzing the above experimental results, four control mechanisms of coal pore characteristics affecting water vapor adsorption were clarified. These findings are of great significance for studying the movement of water vapor in coal seams and understanding the degree of water confinement caused by hydraulic control measures.
Read full abstract