Administration Site Conditions Research Articles

A real-world adverse events study of rimegepant from the FAERS database

ABSTRACT Background The primary objective of this research is to conduct an exhaustive evaluation of rimegepant with the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) repository. Research design and methods This study downloaded the reporting files related to rimegepant from the second quarter of 2020 to the first quarter of 2024. Disproportionality analysis was utilized to explore the relationship between rimegepant and adverse drug events (ADEs). Results This study analyzed 6659 ADE reports associated with rimegepant as the primary suspected (PS) drug. In the disproportionate analysis of system organ classes (SOCs), the significant signal for rimegepant was general disorders and administration site conditions. On the preferred terms level, 35 ADEs were identified following the exclusion. The top 5 ADEs with high signal strengths were medication overuse headache, nasal edema, tension headache, performance status decreased, and motion sickness. The most frequent ADEs were nausea, feeling abnormal, abdominal pain upper, somnolence, and hypersensitivity. In addition, we need to pay attention to the ADEs not mentioned in the instruction and clinically significant: vertigo, hyperacusis, somnolence, Raynaud’s phenomenon, motion sickness, panic attack, and fear. Conclusions This study highlights previously unrecognized safety concerns associated with the use of rimegepant. These novel safety aspects suggest that while these treatments can be effective, additional risks may need further exploration.

Safety of Inclisiran: A Disproportionality Analysis from the EudraVigilance Database.

Introduction: The discovery of serine protease proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has revolutionized pharmacological lipid-lowering treatments. The first PCSK9 antagonists (PCSK9-A), evolocumab and alirocumab, were approved in 2015. Targeting PCSK9 synthesis marked a major advancement in this field, leading to the development of inclisiran, a long-acting siRNA targeting PCSK9 mRNA. However, real-world safety data on this drug are still limited. Therefore, this study aims to provide a real-world safety evaluation of inclisiran, comparing its characteristics to those of PCSK9-As. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using EudraVigilance (EV). Inclisiran-related individual case safety reports (I-ICSRs) from 01/01/2021 to 06/30/2023 were retrieved. ICSRs for evolocumab or alirocumab from 01/01/2015 to 06/30/2023 were collected as a reference group (RG). ADRs were classified using the MedDRA dictionary. Data were evaluated using descriptive and disproportionality analyses. Crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as disproportionality measures. Results: Of the 15,236 ICSRs, 3.7% (n = 563) involved inclisiran, with the rest in the RG. Most I-ICSRs involved female patients (51.7%) aged 18 to 64 (52.8%). The most-reported ADRs for inclisiran were "general disorders and administration site conditions" (n = 347) and "investigations" (n = 277). Significant disproportionality was found in I-ICSRs compared to the RG for "Myalgia" (ROR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.94-3.04), "Low-density lipoprotein increased" (ROR: 11.95; 95% CI: 9.10-15.52), and "Drug ineffective" (ROR: 6.37; 95% CI: 4.64-8.74). Conclusions: The inclisiran safety profile aligns with the existing literature and pre-commercial data. However, further studies are needed to fully understand the observed differences with PCSK9-As.

The Importance of Real-World Data in Evaluating the Safety of Biosimilars: A Descriptive Study of Clinical Practice in an Oncohematological Italian Population.

The clinical safety and efficacy of rituximab biosimilars compared to the reference rituximab (Mabthera) have been well established in randomized trials. However, concerns persist regarding the safety of changing from the reference product to biosimilars, and particularly between different biosimilars. This prospective multicenter observational study was conducted in 13 oncohematology units of eight Italian regions. The study included 800 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who received rituximab between March 2018 and June 2022. To minimize survivorship bias, only newly diagnosed patients (i.e., those without prior rituximab treatment) were included in the analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Thus, this study focused on 505 incident cases (79.8% of the initial cohort) from 13 centers. A total of 3681 rituximab infusions were administered, and 16.8% of the patients experienced at least one ADR. These were observed most frequently during the first infusion (44 patients, 52%) and the second infusion (17 patients, 20%). The most frequent reactions were general disorders and administration site conditions (n. 50, 8% serious). These findings support the clinical safety of rituximab biosimilars and suggest that switching between biosimilars does not increase the risk of adverse events. This evidence may alleviate concerns about biosimilar use, potentially leading to broader acceptance and reduced healthcare costs.

Post-marketing safety concerns with rimegepant based on a pharmacovigilance study

PurposeThis study aimed to comprehensively assess the safety of rimegepant administration in real-world clinical settings.MethodsData from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) spanning the second quarter of 2020 through the first quarter of 2023 were retrospectively analyzed in this pharmacovigilance investigation. This study focuses on employing subgroup analysis to monitor rimegepant drug safety. Descriptive analysis was employed to examine clinical characteristics and concomitant medication of adverse event reports associated with rimegepant, including report season, reporter country, sex, age, weight, dose, and frequency, onset time, et al. Correlation analysis, including techniques such as violin plots, was utilized to explore relationships between clinical characteristics in greater detail. Additionally, four disproportionality analysis methods were applied to assess adverse event signals associated with rimegepant.ResultsA total of 5,416,969 adverse event reports extracted from the FAERS database, 10, 194 adverse events were identified as the “primary suspect” (PS) drug attributed to rimegepant. Rimegepant-associated adverse events involved 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs), and the significant SOC meeting all four detection criteria was “general disorders and administration site conditions” (SOC: 10018065). Additionally, new significant adverse events were discovered, including “vomiting projectile” (PT: 10047708), “eructation” (PT: 10015137), “motion sickness” (PT: 10027990), “feeling drunk” (PT: 10016330), “reaction to food additive” (PT: 10037977), etc. Descriptive analysis indicated that the majority of reporters were consumers (88.1%), with most reports involving female patients. Significant differences were observed between female and male patients across age categories, and the concomitant use of rimegepant with other medications was complex.ConclusionThis study has preliminarily identified potential new adverse events associated with rimegepant, such as those involving the gastrointestinal system, nervous system, and immune system, which warrant further research to determine their exact mechanisms and risk factors. Additionally, significant differences in rimegepant-related adverse events were observed across different age groups and sexes, and the complexity of concomitant medication use should be given special attention in clinical practice.

A Real-World Study on Adverse Reactions of Belimumab Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.

This investigation leverages data derived from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting (FAERS) to real-world adverse reactions associated with Belimumab, with the intention of providing guidance for safe clinical pharmacotherapy. Data encompassing adverse drug event (ADE) reports relating to Belimumab from Q1 2011 to Q4 2023 within the FAERS were extracted and analyzed using methodologies such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). The study identified a total of 19 825 ADE reports where Belimumab was the primary suspect medication, with the United States constituting the majority of reporting countries (16 312 cases, or 82.28%). Patients aged 18 to 64.9 years accounted for the largest demographic (36.29%), while the proportion of female patients (77.91%) significantly surpassed that of male patients (5.03%). The analysis uncovered 184 unique Preferred Terms (PTs) across 21 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Following selection through ROR, the SOC signal strength was prioritized as follows: Systemic disorders and administration site conditions, infections and infestations, a variety of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and conditions related to pregnancy, puerperium, and the perinatal period. The top five PTs for ADE reports not included in the product's labeling were hypersensitivity reactions, immunosuppression, non-vascular diseases, herpes virus infections, and Sjögren's syndrome. The top five PTs for ADE signal strength not included in the labeling were disseminated cutaneous herpes zoster, herpes zoster meningitis, onycholysis, cyclothymic disorder, and mixed connective tissue disease. Based on pharmacovigilance research utilizing the FAERS database, it is recommended that clinical monitoring of Bevacizumab should be intensified to support effective pharmaceutical care and ensure rational clinical medication use.

Mining of adverse event signals associated with inclisiran: a post-marketing analysis based on FAERS

ABSTRACT Background This study analyzed adverse events (AE) associated with inclisiran using the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to detect and characterize relevant safety signals. Methods We retrospectively extracted AE reports from the FAERS database spanning Q1 2022 to Q2 2024. Four disproportionality analysis algorithms were employed to identify AE signals for inclisiran, with subsequent comparisons made to PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (alirocumab/evolocumab). Additionally, we examined the characteristics and onset timing of inclisiran-related AE Results A total of 4,122 reports of inclisiran as the ‘primary suspected.’ Compared with all other drugs, the most significant system organ classe (SOC) was ‘musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders’ (ROR = 3.64, PRR = 3.19) and the most common SOC was ‘general disorders and administration site conditions’ (n = 2,769). And these two SOCs were more strongly with inclisiran than evolocumab. At the preferred term (PT) level, strong signals were detected for cellulitis gangrenous (ROR 101.29, PRR 101.27, IC 6.54, EBGM 92.91), bladder discomfort (ROR 12.61, PRR 12.61, IC 3.64, EBGM 12.48). The median onset time for inclisiran-related AEs was 43 days (interquartile range: 7–99 days). Conclusions This study enhances our understanding of AEs to inclisiran. Future research on its long-term real-world use will offer further insights into its safety.

Disproportionality analysis of data from VigiBase and other global product safety databases on toxicity of iron chelating agents

ABSTRACT Background Iron chelators; deferasirox, deferiprone, and deferoxamine; used to treat iron toxicities due to excessive ingestions or blood transfusions, may cause serious adverse reactions. Research design and methods This study investigates pharmacovigilance data to uncover unknown safety information. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports, to known safety profile of products and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, reviewing over 117.000 iron chelator cases between 2010 and 2020. Results Commonly reported adverse events for iron chelators are general disorders and administration site conditions and GI-related disorders. Reporting Odds Ratio was calculated for iron chelator associations to headache (common), blurred vision (rare) and sepsis (serious). Strong association between deferoxamine and blurred vision (ROR: 2.47 in VigiBase and 3.04 in FAERS), deferiprone and sepsis (ROR; 5.95 in VigiBase and 1.24 in FAERS) were identified. However, results showed some inconsistent associations, such as headache and deferiprone, blurred vision and deferasirox association as per FAERS data; sepsis and deferasirox and deferoxamine association as per VigiBase data. Forty-five new potential signals with different associative values were suggested. Conclusion The study identified strong associations between specific iron chelators and adverse events, though some inconsistencies were observed in the data. These findings, including the 45 new potential signals, suggest areas for further review and validation with additional data.

Signal mining of adverse events of proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma based on FAERS.

To mine and analyze adverse events (AEs) related to proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), providing references for rational clinical medication. AE data related to multiple myeloma proteasome inhibitors were collected from the FAERS from the first quarter of 2010 to the first quarter of 2024. Signal mining of AEs was conducted using the reporting odds ratio method and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network method. A total of 8,805 reports for bortezomib, 5,264 for carfilzomib, and 8,771 for ixazomib were collected, with corresponding AE signals of 474, 279, and 287, respectively, involving 23, 21, and 22 System Organ Classes (SOCs). The report information for the three drugs tended to be consistent: more cases were reported in males than in females; the majority of patients were 65 years and over; AEs mostly occurred within 6months of medication; the outcomes primarily consisted of hospitalization, prolonged hospital stay, and other serious adverse events; the primary reporting country was the United States. The most affected SOCs were infections and infestations, general disorders and administration site conditions, and blood and lymphatic system disorders. The overall distribution of AEs for the three multiple myeloma proteasome inhibitors was consistent, but there were certain differences in specific AE signal characteristics, which should be noted in clinical applications.

A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Events for Trametinib.

This research investigates adverse drug events (ADEs) linked to trametinib, utilizing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, covering the period from Q2 2013 to Q4 2023. We gathered data on ADEs associated with trametinib from the second quarter of 2013 to the fourth quarter of 2023. After standardizing the data, we applied various analytical methods to quantify signals, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation for Neural Networks (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). In our examination of 2200 ADE reports with trametinib cited as the primary suspect, we identified 191 adverse reaction terms across 23 system organ classifications. The most frequently reported classifications were general disorders and administration site conditions, with 1254 cases (ROR 0.83, PRR 0.85, IC -0.23, EBGM 0.85), followed by neoplasms (benign, malignant, and unspecified, including cysts and polyps) with 802 cases (ROR 3.59, PRR 3.32, IC 1.73, EBGM 3.32), and investigations with 794 cases (ROR 1.74, PRR 1.66, IC 0.73, EBGM 1.66). Notably, this study also uncovered previously unlabeled adverse reactions such as cheilitis, lobular panniculitis, ulcerative keratitis, and stridor. While trametinib provides therapeutic advantages, it is associated with several potential adverse reactions. It is crucial for healthcare providers to closely monitor patients for symptoms such as cheilitis, lobular panniculitis, ulcerative keratitis, stridor, and other adverse events (AEs) during treatment.

Adverse events associated with inclisiran: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database

ABSTRACT Background Randomized clinical trials have reported some safety profiles in inclisiran, but adverse events in real-world remain insufficient. We aim to evaluate the safety of inclisiran in real-world by collecting the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Methods Disproportionality analysis was performed by utilizing both Frequency method and Bayesian method to mine adverse event signals of inclisiran. A positive signal was deemed significant when adverse event met the criteria of the aforementioned methods simultaneously. Results We gathered a total of 2309 adverse event reports. Among these cases, adverse events were more common in females and ≥ 65 years age group. After data analysis, 51 positive signals from 11 system organ classes were identified, involving “Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders,” “General disorders and administration site conditions,” “Gastrointestinal disorders,” etc. At the preferred term level, the top three frequently reported adverse events were arthralgia, injection site pain and myalgia. We also found some uncommon but significantly strong adverse event signals (bladder discomfort and sinus pain) which should be taken prudently. Conclusions In this study, we analyzed the real-world adverse events of inclisiran more comprehensively and reported some new adverse events, hoping that can offer more safety information for clinical medication.

Comparing the Differences in Adverse Events among Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study.

In this study, we compared the similarities and differences in adverse events (AEs) among CAR T-cell products through signal mining via the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and identified unknown AEs to provide a reference for safe clinical medication. Data from the FAERS database spanning from the fourth quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2024 were extracted. Signals were identified using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) method. A total of 11,386 AE reports related to six CAR T-cell products were selected. The top three categories of AEs reported were nervous system disorders, immune system disorders, and general disorders and administration site conditions. However, there were variations in the AE spectra among the different CAR T-cell products. The BCMA-targeting drugs idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) were found to be associated with parkinsonism, which were not observed in CD19-targeting drugs. Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) exhibited cerebrovascular accident-related AEs, graft versus host disease, and abnormal coagulation indices. Cilta-cel was associated with cerebral hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, cranial nerve disorder, and facial nerve disorder. Cardiopulmonary toxicity, including hypoxia, tachypnoea, cardiorenal syndrome, and hypotension, exhibited strong signal intensities and considerable overlap with CRS. The number of positive signals for cardiopulmonary toxicity associated with drugs targeting CD-19 is greater. Clinicians should assess patients prior to medication and closely monitor their vital signs, mental status, and laboratory parameters during treatment.

Safety assessment of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.

Aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant are three common neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs) used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Understanding their different adverse event (AE) profiles may help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions. All data collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 underwent disproportionality analysis to detect, evaluate, and compare AE signals of the three NK-1RAs. A total of 3,904, 1,123, and 243 AE reports related to aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant, respectively, were extracted from the FAERS database. Of these, more than 50% of respondents were female, and most of them were aged 45-65years. General disorders and administration-site conditions, and gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequent signals in the system organ class of the three NK-1RA drugs. In addition, aprepitant was strongly associated with joint deposit (ROR = 26.27) and fosaprepitant was closely related to seizure-like phenomena (ROR = 26.90); two preferred terms (PTs) were not mentioned in the manual. Statistically, netupitant was likely to induce death (N = 63, ROR = 8.78, 95% CI: 6.75-11.42). Additionally, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis were unique to netupitant. Furthermore, the AE profiles of the three NK-1RA drugs were different by gender. The AE profiles for aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant were different. In addition to paying attention to common AEs, clinicians need to pay attention to new emerging AEs, such as joint deposit, seizure-like phenomena, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis, regarding the three NK-1RA drugs. Furthermore, the AE compositions of the three NK-1RA drugs were different in different genders, and clinicians should take these factors into account when selecting NK-1RAs for CINV treatment.

A real-world data analysis of ocular adverse events linked to anti-VEGF drugs: a WHO-VigiAccess study.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is key to wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD). Anti-VEGF drugs are the main treatment in clinics. This study assessed ocular adverse events (AE) from anti-VEGF drugs in VigiAccess, WHO's database, and compared adverse drug reaction (ADR) profiles of four drugs to aid personalized treatment choices for optimal benefit and safety. The design was a descriptive retrospective study. We observed four anti-VEGF drugs commonly used in the clinical treatment of wAMD, and their ADR reports came from WHO-VigiAccess. The collected data included the age group, gender, and regional data, as well as the data of disease systems and symptoms caused by ADR recorded in the annual ADR reports and reports received by the WHO. We observed the overall characteristics of the ADR reports of these drugs, then explored the distribution of 27 SOCs of these drugs. Subsequently, we compared the most common ocular ADRs of the drugs. Finally, we compared the commonalities and differences of ocular ADRs related to the drugs. Overall, 57,779 AE associated with the four anti-VEGF drugs were reported. The results showed that the number of females experiencing ADRs (67.83%) was significantly higher than males (32.17%), the age group with the highest reported incidence was over 75years old. More than half of the ADR reports came from the Americas (50.86%). The five most common types of AE were: eye disorders (43.56%), general disorders and administration site conditions (34.47%), injury poisoning and procedural complications (13.36%), infections and infestations (11.61%), nervous system disorders (9.99%). Compared with the other three inhibitors, brolucizumab had a significantly higher rate of ocular ADR reports. The most common ocular ADRs of these four anti-VEGF drugs were mostly related to visual impairment, vision blurred, and blindness. However, there is still a disparity of ADRs between different drugs. The presence of ocular AEs when using anti-VEGF drugs to treat wAMD in clinical practice should attract clinical attention. Clinicians should use these expensive drugs more rationally based on the characteristics of ADRs and develop personalized treatment plans for patients.

Seriousness and outcomes of reported adverse drug reactions in old and new antiseizure medications: a pharmacovigilance study using EudraVigilance database.

Introduction: Epilepsy is a widespread disease requiring long-term drug treatment. The aim of this study was to collect information on reported suspected adverse drug reactions (sADRs) of antiseizure medications (ASMs) and study their seriousness and outcomes in various system organ classifications (SOCs). We intended to compare old and new ASMs' ADRs. Methods: Using EudraVigilance (EV) database, we extracted line listings of reported sADRs with different ASMs over the period from January 2012 to December 2021. The list of ASMs was compiled according to the Anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities version 24.0 was used for determining the SOCs of individual reported preferred terms (PTs) sADRs. In addition, we calculated the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), p-value (statistically significant if p< 0.05) and chi-square statistics. Results: A total of 276,694 reports were contained in the exported line listings which included 1,051,142 individual sADRs reported as PTs such as seizure (3.49%), drug ineffective (2.46%), somnolence (1.32%), dizziness (1.29%) and represented four SOCs: nervous system disorders (19.26%), general disorders and administration site conditions (14.39%), psychiatric disorders (11.29%) and injury, poisoning and procedural complications (9.79). Among patients, the age group between 18 and 64years had the highest percentage (52.40%), followed by those aged over 64years (18.75%). Of all the reported PTs, 882,706 (83.98%) had reported seriousness. Old ASMs had a significant positive association with "caused/prolonged hospitalisation", "congenital anomaly", "disabling", "life threatening" and "results in death", while new ASMS with 'other medically important condition'. There were 386 (0.04%) PTs related to Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP). Conclusion: In our study, we examined 10years' reported sADRs of ASMs in the EV international database. The majority of PTs were serious. Old ASMs were generally more commonly associated with undesired outcomes and seriousness. Considering their expected seriousness and outcomes, the safety profile of the different ASMs, can play a cardinal role in the selection of ASMs.

Adverse Events of COVID-19 Vaccines in the United States: Temporal and Spatial Analysis.

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has had a profound impact worldwide, leading to widespread morbidity and mortality. Vaccination against COVID-19 is a critical tool in controlling the spread of the virus and reducing the severity of the disease. However, the rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines have raised concerns about potential adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). Understanding the temporal and spatial patterns of these AEFIs is crucial for an effective public health response and vaccine safety monitoring. This study aimed to analyze the temporal and spatial characteristics of AEFIs associated with COVID-19 vaccines in the United States reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), thereby providing insights into the patterns and distributions of the AEFIs, the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines, and potential risk factors associated with the AEFIs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of administration data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n=663,822,575) and reports from the surveillance system VAERS (n=900,522) between 2020 and 2022. To gain a broader understanding of postvaccination AEFIs reported, we categorized them into system organ classes (SOCs) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Additionally, we performed temporal analysis to examine the trends of AEFIs in all VAERS reports, those related to Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, and the top 10 AEFI trends in serious reports. We also compared the similarity of symptoms across various regions within the United States. Our findings revealed that the most frequently reported symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination were headache (n=141,186, 15.68%), pyrexia (n=122,120, 13.56%), and fatigue (n=121,910, 13.54%). The most common symptom combination was chills and pyrexia (n=56,954, 6.32%). Initially, general disorders and administration site conditions (SOC 22) were the most prevalent class reported. Moderna exhibited a higher reporting rate of AEFIs compared to Pfizer-BioNTech. Over time, we observed a decreasing reporting rate of AEFIs associated with COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, the overall rates of AEFIs between the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were comparable. In terms of spatial analysis, the middle and north regions of the United States displayed a higher reporting rate of AEFIs associated with COVID-19 vaccines, while the southeast and south-central regions showed notable similarity in symptoms reported. This study provides valuable insights into the temporal and spatial patterns of AEFIs associated with COVID-19 vaccines in the United States. The findings underscore the critical need for increasing vaccination coverage, as well as ongoing surveillance and monitoring of AEFIs. Implementing targeted monitoring programs can facilitate the effective and efficient management of AEFIs, enhancing public confidence in future COVID-19 vaccine campaigns.

Enhanced Safety Surveillance of GSK's Inactivated Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Belgium, Germany, and Spain During the 2022/2023 Influenza Season.

Seasonal influenza is prevented through annual vaccination, especially in children and older adults. These vaccines are annually updated based on World Health Organization recommendations and require continuous safety monitoring. We assessed the frequency and severity of adverse events within 7 days of administering GSK's inactivated quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (IIV4) in Belgium, Germany, and Spain during the 2022/2023 influenza season. In this enhanced safety surveillance study, adults who received GSK's IIV4 and parents/guardians/legally acceptable representatives of vaccinated children (aged 6 months-17 years) were invited to complete adverse drug reaction cards reporting adverse events within 7 days post-vaccination. In total, 1332 participants (53.6% female) received at least one dose of GSK's IIV4, including 43 children who received two doses. Overall, 97.8% of adverse drug reaction cards were completed and returned in the study. All participants in Belgium were adults, while 54.7% and 7.4% in Spain and Germany, respectively, were pediatric participants aged 6months-17 years. After Dose 1, across all age groups, 49.8% of participants reported at least one adverse event. The most common adverse events (cumulative frequency >5%) following Dose 1 were injection-site pain (37.6%), fatigue (15.0%), headache (13.2%), injection-site swelling (9.3%), myalgia (7.6%), and injection-site erythema (7.4%). Across all countries, adverse events were most common in adults aged 18-65 years (59.7%), followed by those aged 3-17 years (47.0%), >65 years (35.7%), and 6-35 months (23.5%). After Dose 2, 18.6% of participants reported at least one adverse event, with general disorders and administration site conditions again being the most frequent. Across all age and risk groups for serious disease, no serious adverse events related to GSK's IIV4 were reported within 7days post-vaccination. This study supports and confirms the acceptable safety profile of GSK's IIV4 across all recommended age groups. ClinicalTrials.gov number: not applicable.

Adverse events associated with eteplirsen: A disproportionality analysis using the 2016–2023 FAERS data

BackgroundEteplirsen (Exondys 51) is an orphan drug approved for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), having received accelerated approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2016. The primary aim of this study is to closely monitor adverse events (AEs) associated with eteplirsen and to identify emerging signals to better characterize their safety profile. MethodsAEs due to eteplirsen usage reported from the third quarter (Q3) of 2016 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2023 were collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The role_code of AEs mainly includes primary suspect (PS), secondary suspect (SS), concomitant (C), and interaction (I). This study targeted reports with a role_cod of ‘PS.’ According to the FDA deduplication rule, the latest FDA_DT is selected when the CASEID is the same, and the higher PRIMARYID is selected when the CASEID and FDA_DT are the same. Disproportionality analyses, encompassing four algorithms for reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian configuration promotion neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), were utilized to quantify the signals of AEs associated with eteplirsen. ResultsFrom the FAERS database, a total of 13,205,369 reports were amassed throughout the study duration. Following the eradication of duplicates, the number of reports with eteplirsen designated as the PS amounted to 1480 encompassed 25 organ systems. Among these, “general disorders and administration site conditions,” “injury, poisoning, and procedural complications,” “respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders,” “infections and infestations,” “vascular disorders,” and “product issues” met at least one of the four computational criteria. Additionally, 55 Preferred Terms (PTs) aligned with the prescribed algorithms. The median time to AEs in these patients was 903 days with an interquartile range (IQR) of 269–1575 days. Moreover, 70.04 % of AEs manifested one year or more after the initiation of treatment. ConclusionAs an orphan drug granted accelerated approval, our study has confirmed well-known adverse drug reactions and identified potential safety issues associated with eteplirsen treatment. This has contributed to a deeper understanding of the complex interrelations between adverse reactions and the use of eteplirsen. The findings underscore the critical importance of ongoing monitoring and sustained observation to promptly detect and effectively manage AEs, thereby enhancing the overall safety and well-being of patients treated with eteplirsen for DMD.

Disproportionality Analysis of Nusinersen in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System: A Real-World Postmarketing Pharmacovigilance Assessment

BackgroundNusinersen is the first drug for precise targeted therapy of spinal muscular atrophy, a rare disease that occurs in one of 10,000 to 20,000 live births. Therefore, thorough and comprehensive reports on the safety of nusinersen in large, real-world populations are necessary. This study aimed to mine the adverse event (AE) signals related to nusinersen through the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. MethodsWe extracted reports of AEs with nusinersen as the primary suspect from FAERS between December 2016 and March 2023. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) were used for AE signal detection. ResultsWe extracted a total of 4807 suspected AE cases with nusinersen as the primary suspect from the FAERS database. Among them, 106 positive signals were obtained using the ROR and BCPNN. The highest frequency reported systemic organ class was general disorders and administration site conditions. Common clinical AEs of nusinersen were detected in the FAERS database, such as pneumonia, vomiting, back pain, headache, pyrexia, and post–lumbar puncture syndrome. In addition, we identified potential unexpected serious AEs through disproportionality analysis, including sepsis, seizure, epilepsy, brain injury, cardiorespiratory arrest, and cardiac arrest. ConclusionsAnalyzing large amounts of real-world data from the FAERS database, we identified potential new AEs of nusinersen by disproportionate analysis. It is advantageous for health care professionals and pharmacists to concentrate on effectively managing high-risk AEs of nusinersen, improve medication levels in clinical settings, and uphold patient medication safety.

A real-world data analysis of tirzepatide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

Tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, is indicated for chronic weight management in adults with obesity or overweight as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. However, the safety profile of Tirzepatide-associated adverse events requires comprehensive evaluation. The AE reports from the first quarter of 2022 to the third quarter of 2023 were selected by exploring the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The new and unexpected potenial AE signals were detected using the disproportionality analysis, including reporting odds ratio(ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) and the empirical Bayes geometric mean(EBGM). Then the MedDRA was used to systematically classify the results. A total of 1,904,481 case reports were obtained from 2022Q2 to 2023Q3. Forty-sixth tirzepatide-induced ADRs at the preferred terms (PTs) level are associated with 8 system organ class In addition, this study uncovered multiple anticipated ADRs, such as gastrooesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, and vomiting, in line with the drug labels. Moreover, unexpected and significant ADRs at PTs level, such as incorrect dose administered, injection site haemorrhage, and increased appetite, were discovered and linked to Injury, poisoning, and procedural complications, General disorders and administration site conditions, and Metabolism and nutrition disorders at the System Organ Class level. This study offered new perspectives on the monitoring, surveillance, and management of adverse drug reactions related to tirzepatide. The outcomes of severe adverse events and their respective detection signals, along with unexpected significant adverse event signals, are important to consider in efforts to enhance clinical medication safety when using tirzepatide.

Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone.

The manifestation and spread of neuroinvasive circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPVs) across several countries, which led to the emergency use of the novel oral polio vaccine type 2 (nOPV2), raised concerns about adverse events following immunization (AEFI) surveillance. We assessed the attributes of AEFI with nOPV2 and examined stakeholder experiences and challenges in AEFI surveillance in Sierra Leone. Using a mixed method approach, we retrospectively reviewed passive data collected during a 2021 immunization campaign, and conducted semi-structured, interviews with vaccinators, district AEFI focal persons, and key stakeholders at the national Expanded Program on Immunization and the National Medicines Regulatory Authority. AEFI were categorized using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Terms (PTs) and System Organ Class (SOC). Outcomes were stratified as recovered or not, with preventability and causality assessed using the Schumock and Thornton and World Health Organization (WHO) algorithms, respectively. A total of 528 suspected AEFI were documented, predominantly affecting children aged 28 days to 23 months (63.3%). Most reported AEFI were administration site conditions and general disorders, with pyrexia being the predominant PT. Of 80 serious cases, 78 recovered, with 74 having an inconsistent causal relationship with the vaccine. Most serious cases (78) were deemed non-preventable, with only two being probably preventable. AEFI reporting was not routinely carried out across the group of people interviewed. AEFI reporting was not consistently performed, with discrepancies in defining reportable events and confusion over responsibility. Challenges with the open data kit (ODK) platform were noted, along with perceived inadequacies in training. While the nOPV2 is relatively new, the majority of AEFI were not serious, and most serious cases were not causally linked to the vaccine. Participants exhibited variations in experience and awareness of AEFI reporting.