Administration Of Adjuvant Therapy Research Articles

The Effect of Adjuvant Therapy on Metabolic Syndrome in Schizophrenia Patients at Madani Hospital

Background: Schizophrenia is a mental disorder that impacts behavior, emotions, and communication. In recent years, atypical antipsychotics have been increasingly prescribed because they significantly reduce both positive and negative symptoms. However, the long-term effects of atypical can cause metabolic syndrome. Additional therapy is provided to maximize the primary therapy and reduce the side effects. Method: This study used a quasi-experimental design with a single-blind, pretest-posttest approach. Patients who had been using atypical antipsychotics, either monotherapy or combination therapy, for more than 3 were examined pretest to determine metabolic syndrome levels. Group A received adjuvant therapy, while Group B did not receive adjuvant therapy. Based on this data, an analysis of the reduction in metabolic syndrome categories was conducted. Result: The percentage of schizophrenia patients by gender was dominated by males (60%). By age, the majority were adults (87%). In Group A, the incidence of metabolic syndrome decreased from 53% in the pretest to 40% in the posttest after being given vitamin A, B, and folic acid therapy. The most commonly used other medication was THP (38%). Conclusion: The administration of adjuvant therapy with vitamins A, B, E, and folic acid can reduce the value of one or two of the five metabolic syndrome criteria for schizophrenia patients (p = 0.052) compared to the group of patients who did not receive vitamins A, B, E, and folic acid adjuvant therapy. Future research should use a longer duration to observe the effects of vitamins A, B, E, and folic acid and evaluate their therapeutic doses. Additionally, it should narrow down the criteria for medication use, focusing solely on the atypical antipsychotic’s clozapine or olanzapine.

Adjuvant intravesical therapy in intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

To evaluate the impact of adjuvant therapy on oncological outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), as due to the poorly-defined and overlapping diagnostic criteria optimal decision-making remains challenging in these patients. In this multicentre study, patients treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumour for Ta disease were retrospectively analysed. All patients with low- or high-risk NMIBC were excluded from the analysis. Associations between adjuvant therapy administration with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed in Cox regression models. A total of 2206 patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC were included in the analysis. Among them, 1427 patients underwent adjuvant therapy, such as bacille Calmette-Guérin (n = 168), or chemotherapeutic agents, such as mitomycin C or epirubicin (n = 1259), in different regimens up to 1 year. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 73.3 (38.4-106.9) months. The RFS at 1 and 5 years in patients treated with adjuvant therapy and those without were 72.6% vs 69.5% and 50.8% vs 41.3%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy was associated with better RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.89, P < 0.001), but not with PFS (P = 0.09). In the subgroup of patients aged ≤70 years with primary, single Ta Grade 2 <3 cm tumours (n = 328), adjuvant therapy was not associated with RFS (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-1.02, P = 0.06). While in the subgroup of patients with at least one risk factor including patient age >70 years, tumour multiplicity, recurrent tumour and tumour size ≥3 cm (n = 1878), adjuvant intravesical therapy was associated with improved RFS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.88, P < 0.001). In our study, patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC benefit from adjuvant intravesical therapy in terms of RFS. However, in patients without risk factors, adjuvant intravesical therapy did not result in a clear reduction in the recurrence rate.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by transoral robotic surgery versus upfront surgery for locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis.

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) able to reduce the adjuvant therapy administration rate. A retrospective bi-centric study was conducted to analyze NAC + TORS versus upfront TORS patients. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to compare the two groups. Among the 300 patients with stage III-IV OPSCC, 204 patients were matched for comparing NAC + TORS versus upfront TORS. Between the two groups, no significant difference was observed in recurrences and in survival for RFS, OS, and DSS. In the NAC + TORS p16-positive population, adjuvant therapy could be spared in 51% versus 16% in the upfront surgery cohort (p < 0.001) due to the lower frequency of pathological risk factors after NAC. NAC followed by TORS for locoregionally advanced OPSCC demonstrated to achieve non-inferior survival outcomes to upfront surgery, while in the p16-positive population allowed to significantly spare adjuvant therapy.

Neoadjuvant therapy reduces node positivity but does not confer survival benefit versus up-front resection for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity-matched analysis.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) is a treatment option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), though its impact on short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term survival remains relatively unknown. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2019 was queried for patients with reportedly resectable (Stage I-IIIB) iCCA who received curative-intent resection with lymphadenectomy. Propensity matching was performed between groups based on the use of NAST and groups were compared for overall survival (OS) and oncologic outcomes, including nodal harvest, rate of node positivity, rate of positive margins, and administration of adjuvant therapy. Two thousand and five hundred ninety-six patients met inclusion criteria; 364 (14%) received NAST versus 1763 (68%) up-front resection. After matching, 332 pairs of patients were matched between NAST and no NAST. Patients receiving NAST had a greater nodal harvest (OR = 1.26 [1.09-1.88]; p < 0.001) and a lower rate of node positivity (OR = 0.67 [0.49-0.63]; p < 0.001). Patients without NAST were more likely to complete adjuvant systemic therapy (OR = 0.45 [0.33-0.62]; p < 0.001). However, patients receiving NAST had no OS benefit after resection compared to those who did not receive NAST (median OS 48.3 ± 5.3 vs. 38.8 ± 3.7 months; p = 0.160). Node-positive disease (OR = 2.10 [1.78-2.45]; p < 0.001) conferred the greatest risk for reduced OS followed by positive-margin resection (OR = 1.42 [1.21-1.47]; p < 0.001) and increasing T-stage (OR = 1.34 [1.21-1.47]; p < 0.001). NAST for iCCA was associated with improved quality of oncologic resection but did not confer an OS benefit versus up-front resection.

Evaluation of different modalities in prevention of seroma formation post-modified radical mastectomy – An observational study from a rural tertiary care center

Background: Seroma, a recognized complication of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) delays the administration of adjuvant therapy and also effects adverse events. Aims and Objectives: This study was conducted to study the sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients developing seroma post MRM and compare the effectiveness of different modalities of seroma prevention since there is a dearth of literature on this matter in our sub-Himalayan region. Materials and Methods: This was an observational study conducted from February 2021 to August 2022 on 60 women with carcinoma breast who underwent MRM. They were studied for sociodemographic profile, cancer characteristics, and seroma prevention techniques and followed up during the study period. Preventive modalities used were quilting, octreotide therapy, suction drains with early drain removal, passive low suction drains, sharp dissection technique, and sclerotherapy. The results were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 22. Results: The mean age was 49.7±9.4 years, 18.3% had hypertension and 10.0% diabetes mellitus, and 58.3% presented with breast lump. Overall incidence of seroma was 23.3%; the highest was observed in sclerotherapy (50%), and the lowest was in quilting (7.1%) (P=0.235). The presence of hypertension (P=0.026) and the non-administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.010) was significantly associated with developing seroma. Sharp dissection was associated with wound infection (33.3%), sclerotherapy with flap necrosis (50%), and quilting with shoulder stiffness (21.4%). Conclusion: The lowest incidence of seroma was in quilting and the highest in sclerotherapy. Adverse events such as wound infection, shoulder stiffness, and flap necrosis were the lowest among patients discharged with passive drains and highest in sclerotherapy.

Oncological outcomes in minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Advancements in surgical techniques have improved outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. To date there have been no meta-analyses comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches for distal pancreatectomies (DP) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to explore the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). A systematic search was conducted for studies reporting laparoscopic, robotic or open surgery for DP. Frequentist network meta-analysis of oncological outcomes (overall survival, resection margins, tumor recurrence, examined lymph nodes, administration of adjuvant therapy) were performed. Fifteen studies totalling 9,301 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. 1,946, 605 and 6,750 patients underwent LDP, RDP and ODP respectively. LDP (HR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.642-0.901, p = 0.002) and RDP (HR: 0.757, 95% CI: 0.617-0.928, p = 0.008) were associated with overall survival (OS) benefit when compared to ODP. LDP (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.793-1.27, p = 0.968) was not associated with OS benefit when compared to RDP. There were no significant differences between LDP, RDP and ODP for resection margins, tumor recurrence, examined lymph nodes and administration of adjuvant therapy. This study highlights the longer OS in both LDP and RDP when compared to ODP for patients with PDAC. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42022336417).

Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification by Digital Histopathology and Deep Learning.

Prostate cancer (PCa) represents a highly heterogeneous disease that requires tools to assess oncologic risk and guide patient management and treatment planning. Current models are based on various clinical and pathologic parameters including Gleason grading, which suffers from a high interobserver variability. In this study, we determine whether objective machine learning (ML)-driven histopathology image analysis would aid us in better risk stratification of PCa. We propose a deep learning, histopathology image-based risk stratification model that combines clinicopathologic data along with hematoxylin and eosin- and Ki-67-stained histopathology images. We train and test our model, using a five-fold cross-validation strategy, on a data set from 502 treatment-naïve PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2000 and 2012. We used the concordance index as a measure to evaluate the performance of various risk stratification models. Our risk stratification model on the basis of convolutional neural networks demonstrated superior performance compared with Gleason grading and the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Post-Surgical risk stratification models. Using our model, 3.9% of the low-risk patients were correctly reclassified to be high-risk and 21.3% of the high-risk patients were correctly reclassified as low-risk. These findings highlight the importance of ML as an objective tool for histopathology image assessment and patient risk stratification. With further validation on large cohorts, the digital pathology risk classification we propose may be helpful in guiding administration of adjuvant therapy including radiotherapy after RP.

Survival Outcome After Surgery in Patients With Thymoma Distant Recurrence

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to describe characteristics and survival outcome of patients who underwent surgical treatment for distant thymoma relapse according to the definition of the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group. MethodsData of patients affected by thymoma recurrence from four different institutions were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patients with locoregional metastases who underwent nonsurgical therapies and with incomplete data on follow-up were excluded. According to the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group distant recurrence definition, patients with recurrence due to hematogenic localization were included. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were described using descriptive statistics, whereas survival outcome was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. ResultsThe analysis was conducted on 40 patients. A single localization was present in 13 patients, the relapse was intrathoracic in 28 cases (70%), and lung involvement was found in 26 cases. The liver was operated in seven cases, whereas other kinds of abdominal involvement were detected in eight cases. Adjuvant treatment was administered in 22 cases (55%).Five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 67% and 30%, respectively. Univariable analysis identified as significant favorable factor a low-grade histology (A, B1, B2): five-year OS at 92.3% versus 53.3% in high-grade (B3–C) (p = 0.035). Site of recurrence and number of localization did not influence the prognosis, but in patients with adjuvant therapy administration, there was a survival advantage also if not statistically significant: five-year OS 84.8% versus 54.5% in patients without adjuvant therapy (p = 0.101).Multivariable analysis confirmed as independent prognostic factor low-grade histology: hazard ratio = 0.176, 95% confidence interval 0.042–0.744, p = 0.018. ConclusionsOur study revealed a good survival outcome in patients who underwent surgery for distant thymoma recurrence, independently from the number and site of the relapse localization. Patients with A, B1, or B2 histology presented a significantly better survival than patients with B3-C.

Prognostic impact of positive microscopic margins (R1 resection) in patients with GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumours): Results of a multicenter European study

BackgroundAlthough several prognostic factors in GIST have been well studied such as tumour size, mitotic rate, or localization, the influence of microscopic margins or R1 resection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GIST in a large multicentre retrospective series of patients. MethodsFrom 2001 to 2013, 1413 patients who underwent surgery for any site of GIST were identified from 61 European centers. 1098 patients were included, excluding synchronous metastases, concurrent malignancies, R2 resection or GIST recurrence. Tumour rupture (TR) was reclassified according to the Oslo sarcoma classification. Cox proportional hazards ratio and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to analyse 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). ResultsOf 1098 patients, 38 (3%) underwent R1 resection with a risk of TR of 11%. The 5-year RFS was 89.6% with a median follow-up of 81 months [range: 31.2–152 months]. On univariate analysis, lower RFS was significantly associated with R1 resection [HR = 2.13; p = 0.04], high risk score according to the modified NIH classification, administration of adjuvant therapy [HR = 2.24; p < 0.001] and intraoperative complications [HR = 2.82; p < 0.001]. Only intraoperative complications [HR = 1.79; p = 0.02] and high risk according to the modified NIH classification including the updated definition of TR [HR = 3.43; p = 0.04] remained significant on multivariate analysis. ConclusionThis study shows that positive microscopic margins are not an independent predictive factor for RFS in GIST when taking into account the up-dated classification of TR. R1 resection may be considered a reasonable alternative to avoid major functional sequelae and should not lead to reoperation.

Effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapy following complete cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent granulosa cell tumours of the ovary

Aim of the present analysis is to compare the impact of antihormonal therapy versus cytotoxic chemotherapy versus a watch a wait approach on disease-free survival (DFS) in the adjuvant setting of patients who underwent complete cytoreductive surgery(CRS) for recurrent adult type granulosa cell tumours of the ovary (GCT). Moreover, we wished to identify prognostic risk factors for recurrence. We included recurrent GCT-patients who underwent CRS resulting in total macroscopic tumour clearance, treated in two gynaecological cancer centres over a 20-year period (2000–2020). CRS was performed for 51 recurrences in 26 GCT-patients. Adjuvant systemic treatments were as follows: chemotherapy in 21 cases, hormonotherapy in 10 cases, no systemic treatment in 20 cases. There were no statistically significant differences in DFS between chemotherapy, hormonotherapy and no systemic treatment: median DFS was 57, 36 and 57 months, respectively (p = 0.616). Extra-pelvic and/or multifocal tumour dissemination were found to be independent predictive factors for subsequent recurrences. In the cases with both lower and upper abdominal involvement (n = 18), patients who received chemotherapy (n = 9) had longer DFS than those who had hormonotherapy (n = 2) or no adjuvant therapy (n = 7) at all: median DFS was 36, 13 and 15 months, respectively (p = 0.9). Our findings do not encourage the administration of adjuvant therapy following complete CRS for GCT-relapse. Selected high-risk patients with disseminated disease may derive clinical benefit from additional chemotherapy, larger-scale multicentre studies are warranted to define treatment algorithms for this rare disease.

CD3-CD8 immune score associated with a clinical score stratifies PDAC prognosis regardless of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy

ABSTRACT Stratification of the prognosis of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) patients treated by surgery is based solely on clinical variables, such as tumor stage and node status. The development of biomarkers of relapse is needed, especially to drive administration of adjuvant therapy in this at-risk population. Our study evaluates the prognostic performance of a CD3- and CD8-based immune score. CD3, CD8 and Foxp3 expression were evaluated on whole slides in two retrospective PDAC cohorts totaling 334 patients. For this study, we developed an immune score to estimate CD3 and CD8 infiltration in both tumor core and invasive margin using computer-guided analysis with QuPath software. Variables were combined in a dichotomous immune score. The association between immune and clinical scores, and both PFS and OS was investigated. We observed that a dichotomous immune score predicts both PFS and OS of localized PDAC. By univariate and multivariate analysis, immune score, tumor grade, adjuvant therapy, lymph node status, and adjuvant chemotherapy administration were associated with PFS and OS. We subsequently associated the PDAC immune score and clinical variables in a combined score. This combined score predicted patient outcomes independently of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment, and improved patient prognostic prediction compared to clinical variables or immune score alone.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival amongst octogenarians following resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

The Australian population is ageing, with an increasing number of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in their eighth decade. This group represents a challenging cohort to deliver multidisciplinary care, with increased morbidity and mortality related to surgical and oncological therapies. This project aimed to compare surgical and oncological outcomes in octogenarian and non-octogenarian patients with colorectal cancer. A matched case-control retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional database of colorectal cancer patients treated between 2005 and 2021 was conducted. Patient demographics, treatment details, peri-operative complications, and long-term survival were reported. The primary outcome, cancer-specific survival, was investigated using time-to-event analysis and interrogated with multivariate regression. There were 747 patients included in the study. There was no difference in five-year cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival between cohorts. Multivariate analysis for octogenarians confirmed a significant hazard signal associated with worsening cancer stage and a survival benefit associated with the administration of adjuvant therapy. However, we noted that stage-matched octogenarian patients received less adjuvant treatment compared to non-octogenarians. Octogenarians undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer have similar cancer-specific survival and recurrence-free survival to non-octogenarians. Our study demonstrates a survival benefit when adjuvant therapy is provided to octogenarians, despite only half of this cohort receiving therapy compared to their younger peers. Further research into adjuvant therapy with surgical resection for CRC in older Australians is required.

Area deprivation and rurality impact overall survival and adjuvant therapy administration in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

BackgroundThe impact of neighborhood deprivation on outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is not well-described and represents an area to improve disparities. MethodsWe retrospectively queried our prospectively maintained database of patients with PDAC (2014–2022). Patients were grouped by Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes. Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regressions were used to investigate effect on overall survival (OS) and adjuvant therapy administration. Results536 patients were included. High ADI patients (more disadvantaged, n = 184) were more likely to identify as non-Hispanic Black (17.9% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to be from rural areas (49.5% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.01). High ADI was independently associated with decreased OS (HR (95% CI): 1.31 (1.01–1.69), p = 0.04). Urban high ADI patients were 3.5 times more likely to receive adjuvant therapy than rural high ADI patients (OR [95% CI]: 3.48 [1.26–9.61], p = 0.02). ConclusionPatients from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods have decreased OS. Access to adjuvant therapy likely contributes to this disparity in rural areas. Investigation into sources of this OS disparity and identification of barriers to adjuvant therapy will be crucial to improve outcomes in underserved patients with PDAC.

Single Lymph Node Metastasis and Adjuvant Therapy in Stage III Tongue Cancer

Background and Objectives We analyzed treatment results among stage III oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) patients and performed subgroup analyses according to the depth of invasion (DOI) and node positivity.Subjects and Method We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 87 stage III OTSCC patients.Results A total of 32 recurrences occurred during the study period, eight cases of local recurrence, 12 cases of regional recurrence, eight cases of distant metastasis, and four cases of loco-regional recurrence. During the study period, 27 patients died due to disease progression. The 5-year recurrence-free survival of the patients was 62.9%, and the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 75.3%. When prognostic factors related to disease recurrence and survival were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analyses, only the N classification was significantly associated with patient survival (hazard ratio 0.36, confidence interval 0.14-0.91). The 5-year DSS of N0 patients was 87.6%, and the 5-year DSS of N1 patients was 63.9%. Among N1 patients, the 5-year DSS was 90.5% when adjuvant therapy was administered and 63.9% when adjuvant therapy was not administered, which is a statistically significant difference. We did not observe any difference in treatment outcome or survival between patients with superficial (DOI ≤10 mm) or deep lesions (DOI &gt;10 mm).Conclusion Among the stage III OTSCC patients, patients with single lymph node (LN) metastasis (N1) showed a distinct prognostic difference from other patients (N0), and the administration of adjuvant therapy to patients having single LN metastasis without other risk factors significantly improved their 5-year DSS.

Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With N1 Involvement or Skip Metastases Presents the Same Survival Outcome: Results From a Multicentric Study

BackgroundThe prognostic difference among patients affected by NSCLC with hilar metastases only or mediastinal nodes metastases without hilar involvement (skip metastases) is still unclear. Aim of this study is to analyse if prognostic difference are present or if the two groups present the same survival outcome. Materials and MethodsData on NSCLC patients from 7 high volume centres (2004-2014) were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Histology different from adenocarcinoma(ADC) or squamous cell carcinoma(SCC), patients without data on lymphadenectomy, who underwent neoadjuvant treatment, with distant metastases or incomplete resection were excluded, selecting patients with hilar involvement or with skip metastases. Different prognostic factors such as Tstage, histology, pathological stage, nodal characteristics and adjuvant therapy administration were correlated to overall survival (OS) by the Kaplan–Meier product-limit method. The log-rank test was used to assess differences between subgroups. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression to compare the prognostic power of different factors. ResultsThe final analysis was conducted on 480 adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma patients. Five-year OS (5YOS) resulted 53.9%. No significant differences in OS were detected comparing pN1 vs. pN2 patients or stage IIB vs. stage IIIA-B patients. Univariable confirmed as favourable prognostic factors young age (P<.001), T1-2 tumors (P=.030), number of resected nodes≥10 (P=.040), lymph node ratio (P=.026). Multivariable analysis confirmed as independent negative prognostic factors T≥3 (HR:1.385, 95%CI:1.037-1.851, P=.027) and age≥68 years (HR1.637, 95%CI:1.245-2.152). ConclusionPatients with N1 involvement or skip metastases present a similar prognosis, suggesting that N2 involvement in these cases may be related to a direct lymphatic drainage to the mediastinal stations.

Major Postoperative Complications Limit Adjuvant Therapy Administration in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma or Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Guidelines for perioperative systemic therapy administration in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) are evolving. Decisions regarding adjuvant therapy are influenced by postoperative morbidity, which is common after pancreatoduodenectomy. We evaluated whether postoperative complications are associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC or dCCA from 2015 to 2020 was conducted. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and postoperative variables were analyzed. Overall, 186 patients were included-145 with PDAC and 41 with dCCA. Postoperative complication rates were similar for both pathologies (61% and 66% for PDAC and dCCA, respectively). Major postoperative complications (MPCs), defined as Clavien-Dindo >3, occurred in 15% and 24% of PDAC and dCCA patients, respectively. Patients with MPCs received lower rates of adjuvant therapy administration, irrespective of primary tumor (PDAC: 21 vs. 72%, p=0.008; dCCA: 20 vs. 58%, p=0.065). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was worse for patients with PDAC who experienced an MPC [8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1-15) vs. 23 months (IQR 19-27), p<0.001] or who did not receive any perioperative systemic therapy [11 months (IQR 7-15) vs. 23 months (IQR 18-29), p=0.038]. In patients with dCCA, 1-year RFS was worse for patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (55 vs. 77%, p=0.038). Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for either PDAC or dCCA and who experienced an MPC had lower rates of adjuvant therapy and worse RFS, suggesting that clinicians adopt a standard neoadjuvant systemic therapy strategy in patients with PDAC. Our results propose a paradigm shift towards preoperative systemic therapy in patients with dCCA.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients with Grade 4 Glioma Treated with Radiation during the COVID-19 Pandemic

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic there was a global disruption in the provision of healthcare. Grade 4 gliomas are rapidly progressive tumors, and these patients are at risk of poorer outcomes due to delays in diagnosis or treatment. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of the pandemic on treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with grade 4 gliomas in British Columbia. We identified a cohort of 85 patients treated with radiotherapy between March 2020-2021 (COVID era) and compared baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes with a control cohort of 79 patients treated between March 2018-2019 (pre-COVID era). There were fewer patients treated with radiotherapy over age 65 in the COVID era compared to the pre-COVID era (p = 0.037). Significantly more patients were managed with biopsy relative to partial or gross total resection during the COVID era compared to the pre-COVID era (p = 0.04), but there were no other significant differences in time to assessment, time to treatment, or administration of adjuvant therapy. There was no difference in overall survival between eras (p = 0.189). In this assessment of outcomes of grade 4 gliomas during the pandemic, we found that despite less aggressive surgical intervention during the COVID era, outcomes were similar between eras.

Hysterectomy alone vs. hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer: Perioperative and long-term results from a propensity-score based study

ObjectiveTo compare outcomes after hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping (SNM) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients. Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective study, collecting data of EC patients treated between 2006 and 2016 in nine referral centers. ResultsThe study population included 398 (69.5%) and 174 (30.5%) patients having hysterectomy and hysterectomy plus SNM. As the results of the adoption of a propensity-score matched analysis, we selected two homogeneous cohort of patients (150 having hysterectomy only vs. 150 having hysterectomy plus SNM). The SNM group had a longer operative time, but did not correlate with length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss. Overall severe complication rates were similar between groups (0.7% in the hysterectomy group vs. 1.3% in the hysterectomy plus SNM group; p = 0.561). No lymphatic-specific complication occurred. Overall, 12.6% of patients having SNM were diagnosed with disease harboring in their lymph nodes. Adjuvant therapy administration rate was similar between groups. Considering patients having SNM, 4% of patients received adjuvant therapy on the basis of nodal status alone; all the other patients received adjuvant therapy also on the basis of uterine risk factors. Five-year disease-free (p = 0.720) and overall (p = 0.632) survival was not influenced by surgical approach. ConclusionsHysterectomy (with or without SNM) is a safe and effective method for managing EC patients. Potentially, these data support the omission of side specific lymphadenectomy in case of unsuccessful mapping. Further evidence is warranted in to confirm the role SNM in the era of molecular/genomic profiling.

Combined robotic hepatectomy & high anterior resection for stage IV CRC at a solo private practice

Background: Colorectal cancer frequently metastasizes to the liver. Limited liver disease can be resected with curative intent. A minimally invasive approach facilitated by the robotic platform offers the opportunity to resect all disease in one operation with minimal morbidity, permitting expeditious administration of adjuvant therapy and the best chance for long term survival.

Optimal choice of drug antitumor treatment in patients with Fibrolamellar liver carcinoma

Introduction. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FlC) is a rare subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Drug antitumor treatment of FlC has not been studied sufficiently due to the rarity of the pathology and requires further research to choose an effective treatment.Aim. The choice of effective drug antitumor treatment in patients with fibrolamellar liver carcinoma.Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 31 patients with FlC who received drug antitumor therapy at the N.N. Blokhin National Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the period from 2005 to 2020. The patients were divided into comparison groups: “targeted therapy” (mainly sorafenib), “chemotherapy” (mainly gemcitabine + cisplatin). A comparative intergroup analysis of the effectiveness of drug antitumor treatment in the 1st and 2nd lines of therapy was carried out. Adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated for time without progression. The correlation of the number of treatment lines in the anamnesis with the prognosis of the disease was also evaluated.Results. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant therapy on relapse-free survival did not prove significant differences between the comparison groups (p = 0.112; log-rank test). Therapy with multikinase inhibitors (mainly sorafenib) allows to achieve a better time without progression compared to chemotherapy (mainly gemcitabine + cisplatin / oxaliplatin) (p = 0.000; log-rank test) in patients in the 1st line of FlC treatment. OS did not significantly differ between the groups (p = 0.417; log-rank test). In line 2, time without progression in patients receiving targeted therapy (p = 0.042; log-rank test) is higher compared to patients receiving chemotherapy in line 2. A longer duration of OV was recorded in the groups of patients who underwent 2 lines of drug antitumor treatment and in the group of 3 or more lines compared with the use of only 1st line of treatment (p = 0.024) and (p = 0.003), respectively.Conclusion. The results of the work demonstrate an advantage in the appointment of targeted therapy as the 1st and 2nd lines of drug antitumor treatment, while the appointment of chemotherapy remains a less prognostically favorable option. Adjuvant therapy administration did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival.