Trial Of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Research Articles

Randomized phase III trial of neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy vs adjuvant chemotherapy alone for localized soft tissue sarcoma (NACLESS, JCOG2102).

TPS11589 Background: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare malignant tumor. Adjuvant perioperative chemotherapy has been investigated for high-risk patients due to the poor overall survival (OS) for surgery. A meta-analysis revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (AI) significantly prolonged OS with an absolute risk reduction of 11%. However, the optimal timing for surgery and number of courses of chemotherapy are still controversial. In Europe, Italian sarcoma group and the Spanish sarcoma group reported on the non-inferiority of three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) + surgery without AC, compared to three courses of NAC + surgery + two courses of AC. On the other hand, even in the same Europe, the latest report on perioperative chemotherapy with AI from Germany was a trial of surgery + AC. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy itself remains skeptical in other countries such as the US, UK, and Canada. No investigation has been made into whether chemotherapy/surgery are better to initiate treatment with. In Japan, the standard treatment is three courses of NAC with AI, surgery, and two of AC with AI. However, in JCOG1306, NAC was discontinued in 12 of 70 (17.1%) patients due to high toxicity. Only one patient (1.4%) became partial response after NAC, whereas six patients (8.6%) had disease progression during NAC. Of the 65 patients eligible for limb-sparing surgery at enrollment, three (4.6%) underwent limb amputation. Upfront surgery followed by three courses of AC was considered the most promising treatment, it avoided extended surgery and reduced toxicity while maintaining an OS equivalent to the standard treatment. The aim of this trial is to optimize the balance between the survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy, reduce toxicities, and risks of extended surgery. Methods: This is a multicenter two-arm open-label randomized phase III trial. Patients are randomly assigned to standard (three courses of NAC, surgery, and two of AC) or experimental (surgery and three courses of AC) arms with AI comprising doxorubicin (30 mg/m2, days 1, 2) and ifosfamide (2 g/m2, days 1–5). Major inclusion criteria were (1) spindle cell STS; (2) T2-4N0M0 (UICC/AJCC 8th edition) and deeply located; (3) resectable tumors in the extremities or trunk; (4) age, 16–70 years; (5) ECOG performance status of 0–1; (6) no history of chemotherapy/radiotherapy; and (7) sufficient bone marrow function. To evaluates the non-inferiority in OS (margin: hazard ratio of 1.61) with power of 70% and one-sided alpha of 10%, 224 patients will be enrolled from 39 institutions in Japan. We began this study on November 16, 2022, and 27 of 224 patients have been enrolled as of January 7, 2024. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031220446 .

A randomized phase II trial of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus observation following curative resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with primary tumors between 1-4 cm: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-LUN18-153.

TPS8118 Background: Each year, approximately 35,000 patients are diagnosed with stage I lung cancer in the United States. Despite early detection, the 5-year overall survival for this population remains disappointing, ranging between 73-86% with recurrence rates from 18-38%. The current standard of care for stage I NSCLC is surgery alone followed by observation as prior trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in this subgroup have failed to show benefit. More modern therapies such as programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have not been evaluated in the stage I setting but have demonstrated significant improvements in pathologic complete response, event free survival, and overall survival when added to chemotherapy for patients with fully resected stage II and III disease. The use of PD-(L)1 inhibition has also demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in OS in both unresectable stage III NSCLC following chemoradiation and in the metastatic setting. Given the activity of PD-(L)1 inhibition in nearly every other subset of NSCLC patients, we aimed to evaluate this therapy following resection in stage I NSCLC patients. Methods: This study is a randomized phase II multicenter trial of adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus observation alone following complete resection of stage I NSCLC with tumors between 1-4cm. The trial randomizes patients 1:1 to either Pembrolizumab 400mg IV every 6 weeks for up to 9 cycles or observation alone. Patients are stratified by PD-L1 score (PD-L1 ≥50% vs. < 50%) and tumor size (1-2cm vs. > 2-4cm), and they undergo repeat CT imaging every 12 weeks. The study is being conducted through the Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium, and there are currently 11 sites open to accrual with one additional site pending activation. The primary endpoint is disease free survival with secondary endpoints including OS, DFS at multiple timepoints (1-, 2-, and 3-years), and safety. The trial initially opened to accrual at the lead site, Indiana University, in May 2020, and enrollment is currently at 95 patients with a planned enrollment of 244. (NCT04317534) Clinical trial information: NCT04317534 .

Evaluating the utility of ZNF331 promoter methylation as a prognostic and predictive marker in stage III colon cancer: results from CALGB 89803 (Alliance)

ABSTRACT While epigenomic alterations are common in colorectal cancers (CRC), few epigenomic biomarkers that risk-stratify patients have been identified. We thus sought to determine the potential of ZNF331 promoter hypermethylation (mZNF331) as a prognostic and predictive marker in colon cancer. We examined the association of mZNF331 with clinicopathologic features, relapse, survival, and treatment efficacy in patients with stage III colon cancer treated within a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial (CALGB/Alliance89803). Residual tumour tissue was available for genomic DNA extraction and methylation analysis for 385 patients. ZNF331 promoter methylation status was determined by bisulphite conversion and fluorescence-based real-time polymerase chain reaction. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the prognostic and predictive role of mZNF331 in this well-annotated dataset, adjusting for clinicopathologic features and standard molecular markers. mZNF331 was observed in 267/385 (69.4%) evaluable cases. Histopathologic features were largely similar between patients with mZNF331 compared to unmethylated ZNF331 (unmZNFF31). There was no significant difference in disease-free or overall survival between patients with mZNF331 versus unmZNF331 colon cancers, even when adjusting for clinicopathologic features and molecular marker status. Similarly, there was no difference in disease-free or overall survival across treatment arms when stratified by ZNF331 methylation status. While ZNF331 promoter hypermethylation is frequently observed in CRC, our current study of a small subset of patients with stage III colon cancer suggests limited applicability as a prognostic marker. Larger studies may provide more insight and clarity into the applicability of mZNF331 as a prognostic and predictive marker.

Abstract PO1-03-03: STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival

Abstract Background: Standardized definitions of efficacy endpoints are needed to improve clinical trial designs, data reporting and interpretation of results, and to allow cross-trial comparisons. STEEP (Standardized Definitions for Efficacy Endpoints) criteria were proposed in 2007 by an expert panel from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to provide common definitions for clinical trials in early breast cancer (BC). Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) was selected as a candidate surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in adjuvant trials and has been widely used in the last 15 years. Advances in BC systemic treatment led to review these criteria (STEEP v2.0), with the definition of a new modified endpoint: invasive BC-free survival (IBCFS). IBCFS excludes second primary non-breast invasive cancers from IDFS which may better detect efficacy effects when the toxicity profile of the intervention is well-known and the risk of second primary cancer is small. Methods: We proposed a multi-trial analysis of 8 adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) trials from GEICAM and TRIO to evaluate the different surrogate endpoints defined in the STEEP v2.0. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through correlation between the ln hazard ratio (HR) of OS and the ln HR of the different studied endpoints across trials. The correlation was estimated by the weighted, by trial size, least squares regression (WLS) line and evaluated comparing the R2 values between OS and the corresponding endpoint tested. Primary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with IDFS/IBCFS. Secondary analyses evaluated the correlation of OS with other STEEP v2.0 endpoints (distant disease-free survival [DDFS], distant relapse-free survival [DRFS], recurrence-free survival [RFS], recurrence-free interval [RFI] and distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI]) and explored the surrogacy between OS and all endpoints in specific groups of patients (pts) according to their risk of relapse: hormone receptors positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) pts with intermediate/high and high-risk and triple negative (TN) pts. Results: A total of 14,473 pts were included. Median age was 50 years (range, 20–82). All were female, and 51.8% were postmenopausal. With a median follow-up of 115 months (range, 0.0–188) we found 2,504 OS events, 4,146 IDFS events (60.9% being distant recurrences) and 3,810 IBCFS events (62.4% being distant recurrences). For each trial, HR of OS, IDFS and IBCFS indicated same conclusions. If HR< 1 for OS, it was also for IDFS and IBCFS and the same was true when HR >1. R2 results of the weighted linear correlations between the ln HR of OS versus (vs) IDFS and OS vs IBCFS were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Confidence intervals (CI) at 95% were both overlapping. All other efficacy endpoints showed strong correlation with OS in the overall analysis. R2 values for HR+/HER2- intermediate/high and high-risk pts were 0.89 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.84 (OS vs IBCFS). For TN pts the correlations were weaker, being 0.63 (OS vs IDFS) and 0.73 (OS vs IBCFS). All WLS R2 values are described in the table. Conclusions: All tested STEEP v2.0 endpoints were strongly correlated with OS (R2 close to 1), meaning that their use as surrogate endpoints for adjuvant CT trials is appropriate. Notably, no differences were found between them in this multi-trial analysis. Therefore, none of them is more appropriate than other to discriminate the value of a new intervention vs comparator in adjuvant CT studies with mature data and long-term follow-up. Table: Citation Format: Sara López-Tarruella, Marina Pollan, Ander Urriticoechea, Eva Carrasco, Gonzalo Spera, Miguel Martín, Begoña Bermejo, Linnea Chap, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, John Crown, Jose Angel García-Sáenz, Arlene Chan, Angel Guerrero, Valerie Bee, Lourdes Calvo, Rodrigo Fresco, Andrea Blasco, Andrés Hernando, Dennis Slamon. STEEP criteria v2.0 validation: A multi-trial analysis using GEICAM and TRIO adjuvant trials to evaluate surrogate endpoints for overall survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-03.

Abstract SY08-01: Does exercise or fitness deter cancer progression after diagnosis

Abstract SY08-01: Does exercise or fitness deter cancer progression after diagnosis

Role and efficacy of capecitabine in the anthracycline-free regimen in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Capecitabine has extensive utilization in the treatment of diverse solid tumors, and its efficacy has been substantiated. Its oral administration and minimal toxicity in clinical practice render it advantageous. Nevertheless, uncertainty remains regarding whether capecitabine can substitute anthracycline drugs in chemotherapy regimens to achieve a lower risk of anthracycline-induced degradation. Consequently, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the potential of capecitabine as a replacement for anthracycline drugs in chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL) to retrieve eligible studies published before July 18, 2023. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data from the included studies using a pre-established data extraction form. The primary endpoints of interest encompassed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)for postoperative adjuvant therapy, as well as pathological complete response (PCR) following neoadjuvant therapy. Adverse events were considered as secondary outcomes. The statistical analysis was performed using Revman 5.4.1. A total of six studies involving 2348 breast cancer patients were deemed eligible according to the selection criteria. The pooled meta-analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant differences observed in the primary outcomes of overall survival (OS) (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.28) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.34) across the four postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy trials, as well as in the two neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials with respect to the primary outcome of pathological complete response (PCR) (OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.93-2.95) when comparing regimens containing anthracycline drugs to those without. In terms of adverse events, the probability of experiencing diarrhea (OR 3.94, P = 0.004) and hand-foot syndrome (OR 10.89, P = 0.004) was significantly higher in the capecitabine group, attributable to the drug characteristics. Conversely, the likelihood of developing neutropenia (OR 0.50, P = 0.03) was higher in the anthracycline group. According to the current evidence, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcomes when capecitabine was substituted for anthracycline drugs. Thus, capecitabine can be regarded as a feasible alternative in the subset of patients who necessitate the exclusion of anthracyclines.

Age, Body Mass Index, Tumor Subtype, and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival

Black women in the United States have higher breast cancer (BC) mortality rates than White women. The combined role of multiple factors, including body mass index (BMI), age, and tumor subtype, remains unclear. To assess the association of race and ethnicity with survival among clinical trial participants with early-stage BC (eBC) according to tumor subtype, age, and BMI. This cohort study analyzed survival data, as of November 12, 2021, from participants enrolled between 1997 and 2010 in 4 randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trials: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9741, 49907, and 40101 as well as North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831, legacy groups of the Alliance of Clinical Trials in Oncology. Median follow-up was 9.8 years. Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants were compared with non-Hispanic White participants within subgroups of subtype (hormone receptor positive [HR+]/ERBB2 [formerly HER2] negative [ERBB2-], ERBB2+, and HR-/ERBB2-), age (<50, 50 to <65, and ≥65 years), and BMI (<18.5, 18.5 to <25.0, 25.0 to <30.0, and ≥30.0). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 9479 participants, 436 (4.4%) were Hispanic, 871 (8.8%) non-Hispanic Black, and 7889 (79.5%) non-Hispanic White. The median (range) age was 52 (19.0-89.7) years. Among participants with HR+/ERBB2- tumors, non-Hispanic Black individuals had worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.04-2.12; 5-year RFS, 88.5% vs 93.2%) than non-Hispanic White individuals, although the global test for association of race and ethnicity with RFS was not significant within any tumor subtype. There were no OS differences by race and ethnicity in any subtype. Race and ethnicity were associated with OS in young participants (age <50 years; global P = .008); young non-Hispanic Black participants (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.71; 5-year OS, 86.6% vs 92.0%) and Hispanic participants (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.16-2.29; 5-year OS, 86.2% vs 92.0%) had worse OS than young non-Hispanic White participants. Race and ethnicity were associated with RFS in participants with BMIs of 25 to less than 30, with non-Hispanic Black participants having worse RFS (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.23-2.68; 5-year RFS, 83.2% vs 87.3%) than non-Hispanic White participants. In this cohort study, racial and ethnic survival disparities were identified in patients with eBC receiving standardized initial care, and potentially at-risk subgroups, for whom focused interventions may improve outcomes, were found.

Acupuncture or moxibustion adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

To compare the advantages and disadvantages of different acupuncture and moxibustion methods by network meta-analysis, in order to find out the best acupuncture and moxibustion adjuvant chemotherapy scheme of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture and moxibustion adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP database and SinoMed. The retrieval time was up to December 03, 2022. ROB2 was used to evaluate publication bias, and Stata16 was used for network meta-analysis. A total of 14 studies involving 921 patients were included. The results of network Meta-analysis showed that the effect of acupuncture combined with chemotherapy was better than that of chemotherapy (RR = 1.28, 95%CI (1.04,1.58), P < .0001). The effect of acupuncture combined with chemotherapy was better than that of chemotherapy in improving KPS score (MD = 9.01, 95%CI (3.35,14.67), P < .0001). The safety of acupuncture combined with chemotherapy (RR = 0.35, 95%CI (0.15,0.83), P < .0001) was better than that of chemotherapy. Acupuncture combined with chemotherapy has the best comprehensive effect.

Les traitements périopératoires des cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules (CBNPC) : standards actuels et perspectives – de la chimiothérapie aux inhibiteurs des checkpoints immunitaires: Perioperative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Current standards and perspectives – from chemotherapy to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Surgery is the standard treatment for stage I to IIIA NSCLC. Several randomized phase III trials of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy have been carried out, demonstrating a significant survival gain estimated at 5 % at 5 years in stages II and IIIA. This benefit has been confirmed by two meta-analyses based on individual data. In stage I, however, the benefit of chemotherapy has only been suggested for stages IB > 4 cm. The Lung-ART/IFCT-0503 trial recently showed that adjuvant radiotherapy has no place in N2 resected tumors. Immunotherapy is taking its place in the perioperative stages. Two Phase 3 trials have shown adjuvant benefit, but have not been approved in Europe on the basis of current data. Four phase III trials Checkmate-81, Neotorch, AEGEAN and KEYNOTE-671 have shown significant benefit from combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, with European approval based on the results of Checkmate-816 in patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1 %.1877-1203/© 2023 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

1937P KM-subtraction meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma

1937P KM-subtraction meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer: a review of randomized controlled trials.

The first randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer was reported in 2002. Since then, studies have continued, with efficacy reported for capecitabine in 2018 and S-1 in 2023. Oral fluoropyrimidines have become established as the standard of care. This article reviews the evidence from the randomized controlled trials reported to date and those that are ongoing or from which results have not yet been reported.

A Multicenter Survey on Eligibility for a Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Biliary Tract Cancer (JCOG1202, ASCOT).

The Adjuvant S-1 for Cholangiocarcinoma Trial (JCOG1202, [ASCOT]) was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with S-1 for resected biliary tract cancer (BTC). This trial reported that overall survival was prolonged with AC compared with observation. With the aim of increasing enrollment, the present survey biannually recorded the number of patients eligible for enrollment into ASCOT and reasons for ineligibility among patients who had undergone surgery for BTC from April 2015 to September 2017 at 36 institutions participating in ASCOT. Of 2039 patients who underwent surgery for BTC, 211 (10.3%) were already enrolled, 166 (8.1%) were eligible but had not been enrolled, and 1662 (81.5%) were ineligible. Among ineligible patients, the predominant reasons for ineligibility were patient refusal (n = 332, 20.0%), pathologic stage (pT1N0; n = 248, 14.9%), age (≥ 81 years; n = 196, 11.8%), and prolonged postoperative complications (n = 176, 10.6%). Patients undergoing surgery for BTC are a heterogeneous cohort comprising patients with earlier pathologic stage, advanced age, and prolonged postoperative complications. These factors should be considered during the design of future clinical trials of perioperative treatments for resectable BTC.

Artificial intelligence–derived immune phenotypes for prediction of prognosis in patients with stage III colon cancer (NCCTG N0147; Alliance).

3542 Background: Solid tumors can be characterized by distinct immune phenotypes based on the level of T cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (TME) which may provide prognostic information and also inform strategies to restore the anti-tumor immune response. Immune phenotypes were determined using an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in digitized whole-slide images (WSI) of tumors with deficient (d) mismatch repair (MMR) vs proficient (p) MMR. Methods: Stage III colon carcinomas (N = 401; 393 met QC) from participants in a phase III trial of FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed including all available tumors with dMMR (n = 196) and a randomly selected cohort of pMMR tumors (n = 195). Using an AI algorithm (Lunit SCOPE) previously trained on solid tumors, digitized tumors were categorized into three immune phenotypes based on epithelial and stromal TIL data-driven cutpoints in dMMR and pMMR (inflamed: TIL high in epithelium (&gt; upper 25%); excluded: TIL high in stroma (&gt;lower 25%), low in epithelium; and desert: TIL low in epithelium and stroma). Phenotypes were then examined in relationship to disease-free survival (DFS) using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: Of the 3 immune phenotypes in dMMR tumors, 25% were inflamed, 50% were immune-excluded, and 25% were immune-desert. Based on univariate results, multivariable modeling was performed incorporating immune phenotype in addition to age, histological grade, N stage, T stage, performance status, treatment arm, BRAF and KRAS status and identified immune phenotypes and N stage to be significantly associated with DFS. Among dMMR tumors, immune desert phenotype was associated with the poorest DFS (Desert: HR adj 1.95, 95%CI (1.01, 3.80); Excluded: HR adj 0.89, 95%CI (0.47, 1.69); Inflamed: ref; p:0.01). When compared to immune desert tumors, immune-excluded tumors had significantly better DFS (HR adj 0.49, 95%CI (0.27, 0.88), p:0.01). At a median follow-up of 60 months, 3-year DFS of patients with dMMR was 71.2% with Immune inflamed, 78.5% with Excluded, and 54.5% with Desert phenotypes. In contrast to dMMR, univariate analyses of data-driven cutpoints in pMMR tumors was not prognostic. Using a different data-driven cutpoint (15%), the revised immune phenotypes remained non-significant for DFS within pMMR tumors. Conclusions: Distinct AI-derived immune phenotypes in the TME were identified that were significantly prognostic in patients with dMMR, but not pMMR colon cancers. A data-driven immune-desert phenotype was identified in dMMR tumors that was associated with significantly poorer survival. Further investigation of the potential predictive utility of these phenotypes for immunotherapy are planned. Support: https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00079274 .

Pathological analysis of tumor microenvironmental features using deep learning to predict survival of colon carcinomas.

3527 Background: Advances in deep learning may improve the ability to evaluate and quantify pathological features in solid tumors to improve prediction of patient disease-free survival (DFS). We used an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to quantify morphological features in the tumor microenvironment of stage III colon cancers. Methods: We analyzed digitized stage III colon carcinomas (N = 402; 382 met QC) from participants in a phase III trial of FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy that included all available tumors with dMMR and a randomly selected cohort of pMMR tumors (median follow-up 60 months) [NCCTG N0147; Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology]. Fifteen morphological features were extracted using the QuantCRC algorithm that segments images into carcinoma (low-grade, high-grade, signet ring cell), stroma (immature, mature, and inflammatory), mucin, tumor/stroma ratio, tumor budding/poorly differentiated clusters (TB/PDC), necrosis, smooth muscle, fat, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor area (mucin, epithelium and TB/PDC). Analysis of AI-derived features with clinical variables, molecular alterations ( BRAF/KRAS), and DFS were examined using Kaplan-Meier methodology and multivariable Cox regression. Results: Among the 15 AI-derived morphological features, the following differed significantly between dMMR (n = 191) and pMMR (n = 189) whereby dMMR tumors had lower mature stroma, but higher inflammatory stroma and tumor, higher tumor grade and increased mucin, TB/PDCs, signet ring cells, and TILs (all p&lt; 0.05). Among dMMR tumors, multivariable analysis revealed that tumor area [mucin, epithelium and TB/PDC] (HR adj 0.45, 95%CI (0.24, 0.84), p:0.01, [Q2/3 vs Q1]) and N stage were the only significant and independent prognostic variables. Among pMMR tumors, multivariable analysis identified that tumor budding/poorly differentiated clusters (TB/PDCs) (HR adj 0.20, 95%CI (0.06, 0.61), p:0.01, [Q1 vs Q4]) was the strongest prognostic variable and the only morphological feature that was significantly associated with DFS along with age, N stage and T stage. Conclusions: Using AI, we can extract and quantify distinct morphological features in tumor sections that differ between dMMR and pMMR and multivariately, can significantly and robustly enhance prognostication within each MMR group. Among pMMR tumors, tumor budding/poorly differentiated clusters was the strongest predictor of DFS. Support: NIH U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, R01 CA210509 (to FAS). Study NCCTG N0147 received funds from Sanofi https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00079274 Key words Artificial Intelligence; Tumor Microenvironment; Colonic Neoplasms; Disease-free survival.

Replication of genetic associations of chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity in the adjuvant NSABP B-31 clinical trial.

The cardiotoxic effects of doxorubicin, trastuzumab, and other anticancer agents are well known, but molecular genetic testing is lacking for the early identification of patients at risk for therapy-related cardiac toxicity. Using the Agena Bioscience MassARRAY system, we genotyped TRPC6 rs77679196, BRINP1 rs62568637, LDB2 rs55756123, RAB22A rs707557, intergenic rs4305714, LINC01060 rs7698718, and CBR3 rs1056892 (V244M) (previously associated with either doxorubicin or trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in the NCCTG N9831 trial of anthracycline-based chemotherapy ± trastuzumab) in 993 patients with HER2+ early breast cancer from the NSABP B-31 trial of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy ± trastuzumab. Association analyses were performed with outcomes of congestive heart failure (N = 29) and maximum decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using logistic and linear regression models, respectively, under an additive model with age, baseline LVEF, and previous use of hypertensive medications as covariates. Associations of maximum decline in LVEF in the NCCTG N9831 patients did not replicate in the NSABP B-31 patients. However, TRPC6 rs77679196 and CBR3 rs1056892 were significantly associated with congestive heart failure, p < 0.05, with stronger associations observed in patients treated with chemotherapy only (no trastuzumab) or in the combined analysis of all patients relative to those patients treated with chemotherapy + trastuzumab. TRPC6 rs77679196 and CBR3 rs1056892 (V244M) are associated with doxorubicin-induced cardiac events in both NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31. Other variants previously associated with trastuzumab-related decline in LVEF failed to replicate between these studies.

Sleep and cancer recurrence and survival in patients with resected Stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB/SWOG 80702 (Alliance).

We sought to assess the influences of sleep duration, sleep adequacy, and daytime sleepiness on survival outcomes among Stage III colon cancer patients. We conducted a prospective observational study of 1175 Stage III colon cancer patients enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80702 randomised adjuvant chemotherapy trial who completed a self-reported questionnaire on dietary and lifestyle habits 14-16 months post-randomisation. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary was overall survival (OS). Multivariate analyses were adjusted for baseline sociodemographic, clinical, dietary and lifestyle factors. Patients sleeping ≥9 h-relative to 7 h-experienced a worse hazard ratio (HR) of 1.62 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-2.58) for DFS. In addition, those sleeping the least (≤5 h) or the most (≥ 9 h) experienced worse HRs for OS of 2.14 (95% CI, 1.14-4.03) and 2.34 (95% CI, 1.26-4.33), respectively. Self-reported sleep adequacy and daytime sleepiness showed no significant correlations with outcomes. Among resected Stage III colon cancer patients who received uniform treatment and follow-up within a nationwide randomised clinical trial, very long and very short sleep durations were significantly associated with increased mortality. Interventions targeting optimising sleep health among indicated colon cancer patients may be an important method by which more comprehensive care can be delivered. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01150045.

Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Response to Initial Adjuvant Chemotherapy Predicts Survival and Failure Pattern of Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma but Not Which Patients Are Suited for Additional Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy: From a Prospective Randomized Study

The predictive value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) for adjuvant chemo(radiation) therapy of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is undefined. We analyzed CA19-9 levels in patients with resected PDAC in a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without additional chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients with postoperative CA19-9 ≤92.5 U/mL and serum bilirubin ≤2 mg/dL were randomized to 2 arms: patients in 1 arm received 6 cycles of gemcitabine, whereas those in the other received 3 cycles of gemcitabine followed by CRT and another 3 cycles of gemcitabine. Serum CA19-9 was measured every 12 weeks. Those who had CA19-9 levels always <3 U/mL were excluded from the exploratory analysis. One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled in this randomized trial. Twenty-two patients with CA19-9 levels always ≤3 U/mL were excluded from the analysis. For the 125 participants, median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were 23.1 and 12.1 months, respectively, with no significant differences between the study arms. Postresection CA19-9 levels and, to a lesser extent, CA19-9 change predicted OS (P=.040 and .077, respectively). For the 89 patients who completed the initial 3 cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine, the CA19-9 response was significantly correlated with initial failure over the distant site (P=.023) and OS (P=.0022). Despite a trend of less initial failure over the locoregional area (P=.031), neither postoperative CA19-9 level nor CA19-9 response helped to select patients who might have a survival benefit from additional adjuvant CRT. CA19-9 response to initial adjuvant gemcitabine predicts survival and distant failure of PDAC after resection; however, it cannot select patients suited for additional adjuvant CRT. Monitoring CA19-9 levels during adjuvant therapy for postoperative patients with PDAC may guide therapeutic decisions to prevent distant failure.

Abstract P4-06-01: Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract In early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC), platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to improve pathological complete response, but recommendations to include platinum chemotherapy are not consistent in international guidelines. We performed a systematic review of published randomized control trials to assess to assess survival outcomes and quality of life for people with early TNBC. The results presented in this abstract have not yet been peer-reviewed by Cochrane. If the final version of the review meets the necessary standards, the review is expected to be published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Methods: Randomized controlled trials examining neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum chemotherapy for eTNBC were included. We searched for published and unpublished data using standard Cochrane search strategies. The primary outcomes assessed were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included rate of pathological complete response (pCR), dose intensity and completion of regimens, grade III or IV toxicity related to chemotherapy, and quality of life. Prespecified subgroups included BRCA mutation status, HRD status, lymph node status, frequency of chemotherapy, type of platinum agent used, and the presence or absence of anthracycline chemotherapy. Results: From 3972 records, 19 published studies were eligible. Twenty six ongoing studies were identified. Risk of bias was judged low for most trials. There were 14 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials, 4 adjuvant chemotherapy trials, and one trial of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Most trials used carboplatin (16 trials) followed by cisplatin (2), and lobaplatin (1). Eight trials had an anthracycline free intervention arm, 5 of which had a carboplatin-taxane intervention compared to an anthracycline-taxane control. All studies reporting DFS and OS used carboplatin. Twelve of 19 studies with a total of 3347 participants reported DFS data. Inclusion of platinum chemotherapy improved DFS in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting (HR 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.75; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88 respectively)). Eleven studies collected OS data, with a total of 3229 participants and 460 deaths reported. Inclusion of platinum chemotherapy in the regimen improved OS (neoadjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.69, 0.55-0.86; adjuvant: 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96). Median follow up for survival outcomes ranged from 36 – 97.6 months. Our analysis confirmed platinum chemotherapy increased pCR rates (RR 1.46 [1.33-1.61], p&amp;lt; 0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed that survival outcome benefits were seen regardless of BRCA mutation status, HRD status, lymph node status, or whether the intervention arm contained anthracycline chemotherapy or not. Platinum chemotherapy was associated with reduced dose intensity, with participants more likely to require chemotherapy delays (RR 2.23 [1.70-2.94], 4 studies), dose reductions (RR 1.77 [1.56-2.02], 6 studies) and early cessation of treatment (RR 1.20 [1.04-1.38], 16 studies). Increased hematological toxicity occurred in the platinum group who were more likely to experience grade III/IV neutropenia (RR 1.55 [1.45-1.66]), anemia (RR 10.12 [6.61-15.50]) and thrombocytopenia (RR 7.59 [5.10-11.29]). There was no increase in febrile neutropenia (RR 1.16 [0.89-1.49]). Treatment-related death was very rare (7 events in 3094 patients) and similar across treatment groups (RR 0.58 [0.14-2.33]). Five studies collected quality of life data but did not report it. Conclusion: Platinum-based chemotherapy using carboplatin in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting improves long-term outcomes in eTNBC, regardless of the examined subgroups. This was at the cost of more frequent chemotherapy delays and dose reductions, and greater haematological toxicity. Benefit from platinum was seen both when platinum agents were added to anthracycline containing regimens, as well as in anthracycline-free regimens. Citation Format: Sofia Mason, Melina Willson, Annabel Goodwin, Jane Beith, Sam J. Egger, Rachel F. Dear. Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-01.

A randomized, multi-center phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) compared to capecitabine (Cap) alone in curatively resected biliary tract cancer (BilGemCap Study): KCSG HB20-14.

TPS633 Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage; thus, only 20% of the patients are eligible for surgical resection with curative intent, with 5-year overall survival of less than 10% for all patients. Recent phase 3 trials using single agent such as Cap or S1 support the role of adjuvant chemotherapy as standard of care in patients with resected BTCs, but the efficacy still needs to be further improved. Therefore, we designed a randomized, multi-center, phase 3 trial comparing GemCap with Cap in curatively resected BTC patients. Methods: The primary endpoint is 24-month disease-free survival (DFS) and secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL), toxicities and exploratory biomarker analysis. Referring to the recent results of BILCAP study, the sample size calculation is based on the assumption that the 24-month DFS would be 50% in the Cap arm, and that treatment with GemCap would improve the 24-months DFS by 10%, from 50% to 60%. As such, 490 patients and 337 events are needed to detect a HR of 0.737, with a two-sided significance level of 5% and 80% power. Patients aged 19 years or older with macroscopically resected intra- or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and muscle-invasive gallbladder cancer (T2-4 or N1-2, M0) are eligible. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status have to be 0-1, and adequate renal, hematological, and liver function is required. Patients who had not completely recovered within 12 weeks from surgery or who had previous history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy for BTC are also excluded. Patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to the GemCap arm or the Cap arm, stratified by LN status (N0 vs. N+), resection status (R0 vs. R1) and primary site. After randomization, either oral Cap (1250 mg/m²) twice a day on days 1 to 14 of a 3-weekly cycle (8 cycles), or oral Cap (830 mg/m²) twice a day on days 1 to 21 plus Gem (830 mg/m²) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-weeky cycle (6 cycles) are given. As of September 2022, 147 patents have been randomized to each arm, and updated study status will be presented. This is a collaborative study with Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) and Korean Pancreas Surgery Club (KPSC), supported by a grant from the National R&amp;D Program for Cancer Control through the National Cancer Center (NCC) funded by the Ministry of Health &amp; Welfare, Republic of Korea (HA22C0053). This is prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0005056. Clinical trial information: NCT0005056 .

Association of Inflammatory Biomarkers With Survival Among Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

The association of chronic inflammation with colorectal cancer recurrence and death is not well understood, and data from large well-designed prospective cohorts are limited. To assess the associations of inflammatory biomarkers with survival among patients with stage III colon cancer. This cohort study was derived from a National Cancer Institute-sponsored adjuvant chemotherapy trial Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Southwest Oncology Group 80702 (CALGB/SWOG 80702) conducted between June 22, 2010, and November 20, 2015, with follow-up ending on August 10, 2020. A total of 1494 patients with plasma samples available for inflammatory biomarker assays were included. Data were analyzed from July 29, 2021, to February 27, 2022. Plasma inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin 6 [IL-6], soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor 2 [sTNF-αR2], and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]; quintiles) that were assayed 3 to 8 weeks after surgery but before chemotherapy randomization. The primary outcome was disease-free survival, defined as time from randomization to colon cancer recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Hazard ratios for the associations of inflammatory biomarkers and survival were estimated via Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 1494 patients (median follow-up, 5.9 years [IQR, 4.7-6.1 years]), the median age was 61.3 years (IQR, 54.0-68.8 years), 828 (55.4%) were male, and 327 recurrences, 244 deaths, and 387 events for disease-free survival were observed. Plasma samples were collected at a median of 6.9 weeks (IQR, 5.6-8.1 weeks) after surgery. The median plasma concentration was 3.8 pg/mL (IQR, 2.3-6.2 pg/mL) for IL-6, 2.9 × 103 pg/mL (IQR, 2.3-3.6 × 103 pg/mL) for sTNF-αR2, and 2.6 mg/L (IQR, 1.2-5.6 mg/L) for hsCRP. Compared with patients in the lowest quintile of inflammation, patients in the highest quintile of inflammation had a significantly increased risk of recurrence or death (adjusted hazard ratios for IL-6: 1.52 [95% CI, 1.07-2.14]; P = .01 for trend; for sTNF-αR2: 1.77 [95% CI, 1.23-2.55]; P < .001 for trend; and for hsCRP: 1.65 [95% CI, 1.17-2.34]; P = .006 for trend). Additionally, a significant interaction was not observed between inflammatory biomarkers and celecoxib intervention for disease-free survival. Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival and overall survival. This cohort study found that higher inflammation after diagnosis was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes among patients with stage III colon cancer. This finding warrants further investigation to evaluate whether anti-inflammatory interventions may improve colon cancer outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01150045.