Adequate Lymph Node Retrieval Research Articles

Survival paradox between stage IIB/C and stage IIIA colon cancer: is it time to revise the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system?

A survival paradox between T4N0 (Stage IIB/IIC) and Stage IIIA colon cancer exists, even after adjusting for adequate lymph node (LN) retrieval and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (C). We conducted a large hospital-based study to re-evaluate this survival paradox based on the newest 8th edition staging system. The National Cancer Data Base was queried to evaluate 35,606 patients diagnosed with Stage IIB, IIC, and IIIA colon cancer between 2010 and 2017. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare unadjusted overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the association of stage with hazard ratios adjusted for relevant demographic and clinical variables including ≥ 12 LNs retrieved and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The 5-year OS for optimally treated stage IIIA colon cancer (receipt of C) was 84.3%, which was significantly higher than stage IIB/C (≥ 12 LNs retrieved + C) (72.8%; P < 0.0001). Stage was an independent predictor of OS. Among optimally treated Stage IIIA patients, T1N1 had the best survival (90.6%) while stage T4bN0 (stage IIC) had the worst (70.9%) (P < 0.0001). Compared to stage IIB, stage IIC had a 17% increased risk of overall death while stage IIIA had a 21% reduction in death (P < 0.0001). Stage IIB/C and Stage IIIA survival paradox persists even after accounting for receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and adequate lymph node retrieval. Future iteration of the TNM system should take this paradox into consideration.

The Relationship Between the Resected Colon Length and the Number of Lymph Nodes in Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective: The prognostic factors that are important for colorectal cancer are the pathological grade of the tumor and the existence of lymph node involvement. Currently, the curative treatment option is resection of the tumor with adequate length and margin along with complete dissection of lymph nodes draining the site of resection. Our study investigated into retrieving adequate lymph nodes for accurate staging as well as the relationship between lymph nodes and colon and rectum specimen length. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study examined the correlation between resected colon length and lymph node count in people with colorectal cancer diagnosed between January 2010 and June 2018. We defined a cutoff value for the segment length to be resected to allow adequate staging of the tumor. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between the resected segment lengths and survival. Results: Of the patients who were included in this study, 211 were men and 169 were women. The mean resected colon length was 26.47±17.09 cm and the mean dissected lymph node count was 29.05±20.84. There was a positive correlation between specimen length and total lymph node count as well as specimen length and the existence of reactive lymph nodes that were statistically significant (r=0.319, p=0.001; r=0.312, p=0.001, respectively). In our study, tumor localization was described in three regions: the right colon, left colon and rectum. The mean right colon region specimen length was 28.8±15.5 cm, while it was 22.0±11.0 cm for the left colon region, and 21.7±10.6 cm for the rectum region. The 5-year overall survival rate was 53.2%, whereas the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 58.2%. Conclusion: The mean specimen length to achieve the cutoff value for adequate lymph node retrieval (least 12 lymph nodes) was 16 cm in our study (ROC curve, AUC=0.689±0.05, p=0.001). The resected colon length and the number of retrieved lymph nodes were positively correlated in our study. Based on this confirmation, a cutoff value of 16 cm was calculated to achieve an adequate segment length to be resected.

Analysis of 10 years of open, laparoscopic, and robotic rectal surgeries in the community setting

BackgroundColorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the US. Many of these patients will require operations. Although there is significant data in the literature that supports minimally invasive colorectal operations in the academic setting, few studies have examined their performance in community hospitals. MethodsData was collected from a high-volume, university-affiliated, community center. Our Cancer Registry Database was queried to include any patients that had rectal surgery at our institution from 2010 to 2020. One hundred-twenty-two patients were identified and reviewed retrospectively. Main outcome measures include estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion, time to first bowel movement, oncologic resection, length of stay (LOS), survival, and cost analysis. ResultsBoth robotic and laparoscopic operations resulted in lower average EBL, less blood transfusions, and less time to first bowel movement (p = 0.003, 0.006, 0.003, respectively). There was no significant difference in ability to achieve R0 resection, adequate lymph node retrieval, and adequate total mesorectal excision (TME, p = 0.856, 0.489, 0.500, respectively). LOS was significantly shorter for minimally invasive operations, 4.35 vs 8.48 days, and average survival was longest for laparoscopic operations at 7.19 years as compared to 5.55 years for open operations (p < 0.001, 0.026, respectively). Cost was lowest for robotic operations (0.003). ConclusionsMinimally invasive rectal operations, especially robotic, lead to better short- and long-term outcomes, equivalent oncologic resection, and are more cost-effective as compared to open operations even in the community setting, supporting continued performance and growth of robotic colorectal operations in the community setting. Key messageAlthough there is significant data in the literature that supports minimally invasive colorectal operations in the academic setting, few studies have examined their performance in community hospitals as this study does. This study found that minimally invasive rectal operations, especially robotic, lead to better short- and long-term outcomes, equivalent oncologic resection, and are more cost-effective as compared to open operations even in the community setting, supporting continued performance and growth of robotic colorectal operations in the community setting.

274. ROBOTIC-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH MEDIASTINAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION: DOES IT FEASIBLE FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA SURGERY?

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer is sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally in 2020. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is one of most aggressive and need extensive operative treatment for radical and oncologic purpose. Conventional thoracotomy is highly invasive, conventional video-assisted is quite technical difficulty related with deep and narrow angle of exposure. Robotic-assisted procedure is new challenging to beat this limitation. This is descriptive report of initial robotic-assisted experiences regard to feasibility, safety and oncologic outcome. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a single-center database from March 2012 to February 2023, including patients aged 45–85 years with resectable lesions of the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent robotic-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy using the Da Vinci Robotic surgery system. Patient data, surgical procedures, interventions, and early outcomes (within 30 days postoperation) were collected and analyzed to assess postoperative variables and adequacy of cancer clearance. The study included 12 patients, and the primary outcome was the incidence of pulmonary complications during the hospital stay. Results The overall incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was 4cases (33.3%), with mild pulmonary infection occurring in 2cases (16.7%) without 30-day mortality in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The median admission period were 2 days and 15 days for ICU and hospital stay, respectively. The median time for the thoracic phase of operation was 210 minutes (150-445 minutes), and the median blood loss volume was 55 mL (20–300 mL). Pathological results showed that overall proximal and distal margins were uninvolved by tumor, and the median number of lymph nodes retrieval in the thoracic region was 22.5lymph nodes (14-73lymph nodes). 41.7% of patients were classified in pathological stage I. Conclusion Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy has shown promising early postoperative outcomes, low blood loss volume, short ICU and hospital stay, a low rate of pulmonary complications and including adequate lymph node retrieval and pathological results. These findings support the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy, which enhance postoperative recovery and improve surgical outcomes for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

The effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing (ET) on accurate colorectal cancer localization and resection has been well established. However, its effect on lymph node (LN) retrieval remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to systematically compare LN retrieval between patients with colorectal cancer who underwent preoperative ET and those who did not. A systematic search for relevant studies was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies that compared LN retrieval in patients with colorectal cancer with and without preoperative ET were included. Weighted pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all outcomes using the random-effects model were calculated. 10 studies, including 2231 patients with colorectal cancer were included. Six studies reported total LN yield and showed significantly higher LN yield in the tattooed group (MD:2.61; 95% CI:1.01-4.21, P=0.001). Seven studies reported the number of patients with adequate LN retrieval and showed a significantly higher number of patients with adequate LN retrieval in the tattooed group (OR:1.89, 95% CI:1.08-3.32, P=0.03). However, subgroup analysis revealed that both outcomes were only statistically significant in patients with rectal cancer, and not in patients with colon cancer. Our results suggest that preoperative ET is associated with increased LN retrieval in patients with rectal cancer, but not in colon cancer. Further large-scale randomized control trials are necessary to validate our findings.

Lymph Node Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Adequate lymphadenectomy with at least 16 nodes retrieved at the time of gastrectomy is a quality measure recommended to ensure adequate staging. The minimum nodal retrieval recommended after receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is less defined. Patients with clinical stages 1 to 3 gastric adenocarcinoma who received NACT and surgical resection were identified from the 2004-2015 National Cancer Database. The optimal nodal harvest number was calculated with Cox spline regression modeling. Cohorts with a nodal harvest higher or lower than this number were 1:1 propensity score-matched. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Among 4337 patients receiving NACT, the optimal minimal nodal harvest at gastrectomy was 23 nodes. Compared with the patients who had fewer than 23 nodes retrieved, the patients with at least 23 nodes examined (n = 1073, 24.7%) were more likely to be female (26.1% vs 22%; p = 0.006) and non-white (29.3% vs 18.5%; p < 0.0001), to have a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 (71.5% vs 66.8%; p = 0.005), and to have undergone resection at an academic facility (67.9% vs 51.5%; p < 0.0001). The patients with at least 23 nodes examined had higher proportions of high-grade tumor (62% vs 57.4%; p = 0.030), pT3 or pT4 tumor (56.3% vs 48.7%; p < 0.0001), body tumor (21.3% vs 12.5%; p < 0.0001), or antrum/pylorus tumor (15.3% vs 11.4%; p < 0.0001). The patients with at least 23 nodes were more likely to have lymph node metastases identified (61% vs 51%; p < 0.0001). After matching, the patients with at least 23 nodes (n = 990) demonstrated an improved 5-year OS (57.9% vs 49%; p = 0.001). The extent of lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma should not be reduced after NACT because adequate lymph node retrieval remains important for prognostication.

Preoperative endoscopic tattooing technique improved lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy

AimsTo describe the clinical utility of lymph node retrieval and prognostic value of tattooing in rectal cancer (RC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).MethodsA total 97 RC patients underwent preoperative...

Can pathological reports of rectal cancer provide national quality indicators?

Rectal cancer care has become increasingly complex and requires accurate information. The pathology report is a vital tool for accessing information to gauge a patient's prognosis and to guide treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of histopathological reporting and surgery for rectal cancer in New Zealand using defined quality indicators. This is a retrospective audit of pathological reports of all resected rectal cancer pathology reports submitted to the New Zealand Cancer Registry (NZCR) in 2015. The quality of reporting was assessed using specified criteria: synoptic report, adequate lymph node retrieval, reporting of circumferential resection margin (CRM) and mesorectal excision quality. Surgical outcomes were sphincter preservation rate, CRM clearance and complete mesorectal excision. A total of 803 patients with rectal cancer were reported to the NZCR in 2015, 505 underwent proctectomy. A total of 89.5% of reports were structured, 81.8% reported mesorectal excision quality and 86.7% reported CRM status. Adequate lymph node retrieval was obtained in 65.1%, complete mesorectal excision in 84.6% and positive CRM in 6.2% of cases. Quality varied between laboratories and district health boards. High-volume laboratories had higher quality reporting. Surgeon volume and training was related to adequate lymph node retrieval but not CRM clearance nor mesorectal excision quality. High-quality pathological reporting is associated with the use of synoptic reporting templates. Surgical outcomes for rectal cancer in New Zealand, especially the low rate of CRM involvement, compare favourably with international audits.

Comparison of standard modified shrobingers incision versus transverse cervical incision for neck dissection – our experience

AimTo compare the feasibility and outcomes of Transverse Cervical incision and Modified Schobinger's incision for neck dissection. Materials and methodsPatients having oral cavity cancer with positive metastatic nodal disease in the neck requiring ablative surgery were included. Patients requiring a lip split incision for tumor ablation were excluded from the study. A total of forty patients were selected and were randomized in two groups. Transverse Cervical incision was placed in group A for neck dissection and a standard Modified Schobinger's incision in group B. These two groups were then compared on the basis of criteria's like adequacy of surgical access, flap dehiscence or necrosis, number of lymph nodes retrieved, length of incision, wound contracture, length of hospital stay and cosmetic result. ResultsResult of our study show that Transverse Cervical incision had adequate surgical access, adequate lymph node retrieval, and better cosmetic result, less postoperative complications with early discharge of patient as compared to Modified Schobinger's incision for neck dissection. ConclusionAccording to our experience, we believe that this transverse cervical incision in oral cancer patients can be very useful which fulfills all the requirements for neck dissection in terms of required surgical access, adequate lymph nodes retrieval, good healing of skin flaps and better cosmetic result without any postoperative complications.

Apical Lymph Nodes in the Distant Metastases and Prognosis of Patients with Stage III Colorectal Cancer with Adequate Lymph Node Retrieval Following FOLFOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

The aim of the study was to assess apical lymph nodes (APNs) for predicting distant metastases in patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) curatively treated with FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy and adequate lymph node retrieval. We investigated the correlation between APN metastasis and clinical outcomes. This retrospective study examined 97 patients. All patients were followed until death, loss to follow-up, or May 2017. Clinicopathological variables, including the APN status, were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify the independent risk factors for APN and distant metastases, and Cox proportional regression model was used to evaluate the association between APN metastasis and oncologic outcomes. Multivariate analyses revealed the N2 stage as an independent predictor of APN metastasis [P = 0.036; odds ratio (OR): 3.016; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.076-8.499], while APN metastasis was an independent risk factor for distant metastases (P < 0.001; OR: 13.876; 95% CI: 3.815-50.475). Furthermore, APN metastasis was an independent risk factor for poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively). The liver (31.6%) was the most common site of distant metastases in patients with APN metastases. APN metastasis is an important prognostic factor for node-positive CRC; it enhanced the distant metastases in patients with stage III CRC curatively treated with adequate lymph node retrieval following FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, for patients with stage III CRC involving APN metastasis, prospectively randomized trials are mandatory to investigate different therapeutic strategies in addition to conventional FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy.

Robotic-Assisted Pelvic and High Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy (RPLND) for Endometrial Cancer and Learning Curve

The present prospective non-randomized observational study was designed to analyse the learning curve for robotic-assisted pelvic and high para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer patients. Between 2011 and 2013, 131 consecutive endometrial cancer patients underwent type-1 extrafascial pan hysterectomy with pelvic and high para-aortic lymphadenectomy using the daVinci® robotic surgical procedures at single quaternary care Indian cancer institution. For lymph nodes retrieval data, the point at which as per AJCC-TNM staging, time taken to reach, recommended minimum number of lymph nodes at each segment of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was plotted and analysed. Data were analysed for the number of lymph nodes retrieved in pelvic and high para-aortic lymphadenectomy specimen. The surgery was performed by the same surgeon in all cases. Target number of pelvic lymph nodes 12 was achieved by ninth case, and consistently, more number of pelvic nodes were removed. Target number of para-aortic lymph nodes 10 was achieved at eighteenth case. In our study, adequate number of pelvic lymph nodes retrieval of 12 was achieved by ninth case, and consistently, more number of pelvic nodes were removed and para-aortic lymph nodes retrieval of 10 was after eighteenth case. Our study confirms the proficiency and efficiency of robotic surgical approach in treatment of endometrial cancer, with adequate lymph node retrieval, and offers a safe and useful alternative to conventional surgical techniques with shorter learning curve.

Getting Started with Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is It Worth It?

This study evaluates the safety and cost of introducing minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) to a surgeon's practice. All MIPDs performed between December 2011 and July 2013 were compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) cases by the same surgeon. The primary outcomes were mortality, major morbidity, and re-operation. Secondary outcomes were perioperative and oncologic outcomes and cost. MIPD include total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) and laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (LAPD), where a small incision is used for reconstruction. Bivariate comparisons of outcomes were performed using nonparametric tests. In total, 44 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed: 15 MIPDs (2 TLPDs and 13 LAPDs) and 29 OPDs. One death occurred in each group. Major complication rates were not significantly different (33% for MIPD versus 17% for OPD); however, there was a trend toward more re-operation after MIPD compared with OPD (20% versus 3%; P = .07). The incidence of pancreatic leak (20% for MIPD versus 14% for OPD), biliary leak (0% versus 7%, respectively), abscess formation (27% versus 14%, respectively), and intraabdominal hemorrhage (13% versus 3%, respectively) were not significantly different. MIPD achieved equivalent oncologic outcomes as OPD with 100% R0 margin and adequate lymph node retrieval. There was no statistical difference in median operative time (342 minutes for MIPD versus 358 minutes for OPD), length of stay (8 versus 9 days, respectively), operating room expenses (Canadian) ($7246.0 versus $6912.0, respectively), or total cost (Canadian) per case ($15,034.0 versus $18,926.0, respectively). MIPD and OPD had similar safety and cost in this introductory series. However, a trend toward a higher rate of re-operation for pancreatic leak suggests the need for caution in introducing this novel technique.

The role of the cancer center when using lymph node count as a quality measure for gastric cancer surgery.

Cancer center recognition, offered as accreditation by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer or the National Cancer Institute, and quality measure reporting purport to improve the quality of cancer care. For surgically resectable gastric cancer, removal of 15 or more lymph nodes has been associated with improved outcomes and has been endorsed as a gastric cancer quality measure. To determine whether cancer center classification is associated with compliance with the lymph node-count quality measure and the effect of compliance with the measure on overall survival. A retrospective review of prospectively collected population-based data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cancer Registry of Greater California and California Cancer Registry was conducted. Participants included patients who underwent surgery for stage I to III gastric adenocarcinoma between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2010. Compliance with removal of 15 or more lymph nodes and overall survival. Of 3321 gastric cancer cases, 42.3% had a minimum of 15 lymph nodes removed. Hospitals with cancer program recognition treated 69.9% of the cases. In hospitals without cancer program approval, 34.8% of the patients had 15 or more lymph nodes removed compared with 45.5% in the facilities with cancer program approval. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing gastrectomy had significantly higher odds of having 15 or more lymph nodes removed if they were younger (trend P < .001), Asian/other race/ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50), or non-Hispanic black (AOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82) compared with non-Hispanic white, received diagnosis at a progressively higher stage (trend P < .001), or received diagnosis in a more recent year (trend P < .001). Removal of 15 or more lymph nodes was associated with cancer program recognition (vs no recognition) (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.25-1.74). Cox proportional hazards regression showed that improved survival was predicted by removal of 15 or more lymph nodes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.78) but not by cancer program recognition (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.15). Although adequate lymph node retrieval is more likely in hospitals with a recognized cancer program, survival outcome is associated with the lymph node count rather than with cancer program classification. Less than half of the cases reviewed in this study met the minimum lymph node-count guideline, indicating the need for process improvement for all hospitals.

A Multi-institutional Analysis of Open Versus Minimally-Invasive Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Results of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative

BackgroundSurgical experience with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has increased; however, published reports on MIS resection of gastric adenocarcinoma are limited. MethodsBetween 2000 and 2012, 880 patients who underwent surgical resection of gastric adenocarcinoma were identified from a multi-institutional database. Clinicopathological characteristics, operative details, and outcomes were stratified by operative approach (open vs. MIS) and analyzed. ResultsOverall, 70 (8 %) patients had a MIS approach. Patients who underwent a MIS resection were more likely to have a smaller tumor (open 4.5 cm vs. MIS 3.0 cm, p < 0.001). MIS resections were associated with lower estimated blood loss (open 250 cc vs. MIS 150 cc) and longer operative time (open 232 min vs. MIS 271 min) compared with open surgery (both p < 0.05). An R0 resection was achieved in most patients (open 90.9 % vs. MIS 98.6 %, p = 0.03) and median lymph node yield was good in both groups (open 17 vs. MIS 14, p = 0.10). MIS had a similar incidence of complications (open 33.1 % vs. MIS 20 %, p = 0.07) and a similar length of stay (open 9 days vs. MIS 7 days, p = 0.13) compared with open surgery. In the propensity-matched analysis, median recurrence-free and overall were not impacted by operative approach. ConclusionAn MIS approach to gastric cancer was associated with adequate lymph node retrieval, a high incidence of R0 resection, and comparable long-term oncological outcomes versus open gastrectomy.

Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013

In order to improve the quality of treatment for cancer patients the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft) implemented a certification system for oncological care institutions. The certified colorectal cancer centers present the structures, processes and results of their network in the framework of an auditing procedure. The current benchmarking report by the certified centers reflects the centers' reference results over a period of 3 years. The figures included in the benchmarking report reflect the areas of interdisciplinary collaboration, guideline-compliant treatment, and expertise of the main treatment partners. High percentages were shown for indicators reflecting pretreatment and postoperative case presentations in multidisciplinary team meetings (91.8 % or 98.1 %), psycho-oncologic care (54.8 %) as well as social service counseling (77.1 %). Good quality of the TME rectal specimen and adequate lymph-node retrieval (12 lymph nodes at least) was achieved by 93 % or 96.6 % of the centers. Adjuvant chemotherapy (colon, Union for International Cancer Control [UICC] stage III) or neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (rectum, UICC stages II and III) received 73.7 % or 80 % of relevant patients. Quotas of anastomotic leakage in the colon or rectum were 4.4 % or 7.6 %, whereas postoperative mortality amounted to 2.6 %. The present analysis of the results, together with the centers' statements and the auditors' reports, shows that most of the targets for indicator figures are being better met over the course of time. In addition, however, there is a clear potential for improvement and the centers are verifiably addressing this. A transparent presentation of the quality of care and reflection on and discussion of the results among the treatment partners in the certified network and with the auditors during the certification process may contribute to constant quality improvement in oncological care.

Evaluation of preoperative C-reactive protein aids in predicting poor survival in patients with curative colorectal cancer with poor lymph node assessment

Lymph node status is the most significant prognostic factor of colorectal cancer. However, there is a risk of disease understaging if the extent of lymph node assessment is sub-optimal. Preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) is known to be a useful tool in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. We retrospectively evaluated whether CRP adds to prognosis information in stage I–III colorectal cancer patients with poor lymph node assessment. In stages I–III, multivariate analysis revealed that CRP-positive status and advanced T-stage were factors that independently affected survival. In stage III, univariate analysis revealed that lymph node number retrieval and lymph node ratio were factors that affected survival. However, CRP positivity was the only independent factor for survival. CRP positivity did not predict poor prognosis in stage II or III patients with adequate lymph node retrieval. By contrast, the prognosis of CRP-positive patients was poorer than that of CRP-negative patients in stage II and III, with inadequate lymph node retrieval. CRP is an independent prognostic marker in patients with stage I–III, II or III colorectal cancer. The evaluation of CRP may provide useful information on prognosis in curative patients with an inadequate examination of lymph nodes.

Single port access proctectomy with total mesorectal excision and intersphincteric resection with a primary transanal approach

Minimally invasive surgery is advancing with single port access (SPA). We describe a technique for a SPA transabdominal combined with transanal approach to perform laparoscopic proctectomy with total mesorectal excision (TME) and intersphincteric resection of low rectal adenocarcinoma. Transanal intersphincteric resection was followed by laparoscopic abdominal proctectomy with TME. An SPA device was placed at the site of the future stoma through a 2.5-cm incision. A hand-sewn side-to-end coloanal anastomosis was performed and a terminal loop ileostomy was created at the site of the SPA device. The procedure was performed on two healthy nonobese women who had not had previous abdominal surgery. The operating times were 195 and 210 min, and blood loss < 250 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, with discharge on postoperative days 5 and 6. Pathological examination revealed adequate surgical margins and lymph node retrieval with an intact mesorectum. Four weeks after stoma closure, the scar in the right lower quadrant was 35 mm in one patient and 45 mm in the other, and the scar from the 5-mm port was barely visible. This preliminary experience shows that proctectomy with TME and intersphincteric resection can be safely performed using only two ports.

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a case–control study

In a non-specialized setting, laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for locally advanced diseases remains controversial, particularly given to the technical demands of the learning curve required to perform an adequate resection with D2 lymph node dissection. Inclusion criteria for this statistically generated matching controlled study were all patients who underwent subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomies from January 2006 until September 2009 for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (stage II-IIIb), compared with matched patients who underwent the same procedure in an open fashion during the same period. Sixty case-matched patients were evaluated (30 laparoscopic vs. 30 open). Operative time was significantly longer (p<0.05) for LDG. Benefits for LDG (p<0.05) were observed among surgical short-term outcome (postoperative hospital stay, ambulation, first bowel movement, first flatus, first stool, first eating and use of analgesic drugs) and postoperative non-surgical site complications (cardiopulmonary, urinary, etc.). The 42months' overall survival was similar (p=0.646). Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a safe technique in a non-academic hospital setting for locally advanced gastric cancer; it seems to be adequate in terms of margin status and adequate lymph node retrieval and is associated with additional benefits as a decreased length of hospital stay, a decreased narcotic use and fewer complications.

Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer

Alternative lymph node (LN) parameters have been proposed to improve staging in colorectal cancer. This study compared these alternative parameters with conventional TNM staging in predicting long-term survival in patients undergoing curative resection. A total of 295 consecutive patients (mean age 70 years; range 39–95; s.d. 10.4) underwent resection for colorectal cancer from 2001 to 2004. Age, sex, primary tumour site, TNM stage and chemotherapy/radiotherapy were recorded. Patients with colon and rectal cancers were analysed separately for LN parameters: LN total; adequate LN retrieval (⩾12) and inadequate (<12); total number of negative LN; total number of positive LN and the ratio of positive LN to total LN (pLNR). Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed. The median number of LN retrieved was 10 (1–57) with adequate LN retrieval in 147 cases (49.8%). For each T and N stage, inadequate LN retrieval did not adversely affect long-term survival (P>0.05). On multivariate analysis, only pLNR was an independent predictor of overall survival in both colon and rectal cancers (HR 11.65, 95% CI 5.00–27.15, P<0.001 and HR 13.40, 95% CI 3.64–49.10, P<0.001, respectively). Application of pLNR subdivided patients into four prognostic groups. Application of the pLNR improved patient stratification in colorectal cancer and should be considered in future staging systems.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Subtotal Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma: A Case–Control Study

The aim of this study is to compare technical feasibility and oncologic efficacy of totally laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma is emerging in the West as a technique that may offer benefits for patients, although large-scale studies are lacking. This study was designed as a case-controlled study from a prospective gastric cancer database. Thirty consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma were compared with 30 patients undergoing open subtotal gastrectomy. Controls were matched for stage, age, and gender via a statistically generated selection of all gastrectomies performed during the same period of time. Patient demographics, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, histologic features, location of tumor, lymph node retrieval, recurrence, margins, and early and late postoperative complications were compared. Tumor location and histology were similar between the two groups. Median operative time for the laparoscopic approach was 270 min (range 150-485 min) compared with median of 126 min (range 85-205 min) in the open group (p < 0.01). Hospital length of stay after laparoscopic gastrectomy was 5 days (range 2-26 days), compared with 7 days (range 5-30 days) in the open group (p = 0.01). Postoperative pain, as measured by number of days of IV narcotic use, was significantly lower for laparoscopic patients, with a median of 3 days (range 0-11 days) compared with 4 days (range 1-13 days) in the open group (p < 0.01). Postoperative early complications trended towards a decrease for laparoscopic versus open surgery patients (p = 0.07); however, there were significantly more late complications for the open group (p = 0.03). Short-term recurrence-free survival and margin status was similar between the two groups (p = not significant) with adequate lymph node retrieval in both groups. Laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma is comparable to the open approach with regard to oncologic principles of resection, with equivalent margin status and adequate lymph node retrieval, demonstrating technically feasibility and equivalent short-term recurrence-free survival. Additional benefits of decreased postoperative complications, decreased length of hospital stay, and decreased narcotic use make this a preferable approach for selected patients.