Adequate Chest Compression Research Articles

Effectiveness of innovative chest compression on the emergency department stretcher by an alternative method: a randomized controlled crossover trial

Comparison of the three methods standing-on-a-stool (SS), one knee kneeling on a stretcher (KS), and kneeling at the same height as the patient’s bed on the kneeling stool (KK) to evaluate the yielded of highest CPR quality and rescuer comfortability. A prospective randomized cross-over study which compares the three different rescuer positions for their effectiveness of chest compression. Conducted at a tertiary care between 19 and 22 Aug 2022. Emergency personnel aged 18 years or older, who completed the AHA-approved BLS course. The chest compression data was obtained by the ALIVE AED manikin® and AED reporting system. The information on the CPR quality and post-test questionnaires assessing the participants’ preference, satisfaction and modified Borg’s scale score was collected. The three methods shown no statistically significant difference in adequate chest compression depth (percentage). KK was not superior than SS at chest compression rate (P = 0.05). The adequate full chest recoil achieved with KK and KS were significantly higher than that of SS. However, there were no statistical difference between the three methods in the modified Borg’s scale score. Based on the satisfying score, the rescuers preferred KK to either SS (p 0.007) or KS (p 0.012). The three methods shown no statistically significant difference in adequate chest compression depth (percentage). Still, both KK and KS provided more adequate chest recoil, so we would recommend using these two methods in the ED.Clinical trial registry: This study was retrospective registration in thaiclinicaltrials.org (TCTR20230119002, 19/1/2023).

Drone-Facilitated Real-Time Video-Guided Feedback Helps to Improve the Quality of Lay Bystander Basic Life Support. A Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial

Objectives Telephone instructions are commonly used to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by lay bystanders. This usually implies an audio but no visual connection between the provider and the emergency medical telecommunicator. We aimed to investigate whether video-guided feedback via a camera drone enhances the quality of CPR. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled simulation trial. Lay rescuers performed 8 min of CPR on an objective feedback manikin. Participants were randomized to receive telephone instructions with (intervention group) or without (control group) a drone providing a visual connection with the telecommunicator after a 2-min run-in phase. Performed work (total compression depth minus total lean depth) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of effective chest compressions, average compression depth, subjective physical strain measured every 2 min, and dexterity in the nine-hole peg test after the scenario. Outcomes were compared using the t- and Mann Whitney-U tests. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results We included 27 individuals (14 (52%) female, mean age 41 ± 14 years). Performed work was greater in the intervention than in the control group (41.3 ± 7.0 vs. 33.9 ± 10.9 m; absolute difference 7.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 14.8; p = 0.046), with higher average compression depth (49 ± 7 vs. 40 ± 13 mm; p = 0.041), and higher proportions of adequate chest compressions (43 (IQR 14–60) vs. 3 (0–29) %; p = 0.041). We did not find any significant differences regarding the remaining secondary outcomes. Conclusion Video-guided feedback via drones might be a helpful tool to enhance the quality of telephone-assisted CPR in lay bystanders.

A computer-based examination of the quality of resuscitation measures based on device data

Sudden cardiac arrest represents a critical medical emergency where the quality of resuscitation measures is crucial for favorable outcomes[1,2]. The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be assessed through the analysis of data recorded by the defibrillator during CPR. The data is routinely recorded at the base of the emergency medical vehicles at the University Hospital of Graz.&#x0D; To assess CPR quality, algorithms were implemented to identify chest compressions based on the chest impedance and ventilations using the capnography signals. With these algorithms, parameters for CPR quality can be determined. A dataset with 522 cases was used, of which 97 cases were automatically discarded as they contained no or no relevant impedance signals.&#x0D; The mean chest compression rate of the cases is 116.3 ± 9.1 compressions per minute, which is within the target range of 90 – 120. However, in 31% of cases, the rate was found to be too high. The proportion of minutes without an adequate mean chest compression rate was 29.2 ([6.2; 60.4]) %.&#x0D; The mean ventilation frequency of all cases with capnography signal (150 cases) was 13.5 ± 3.6 ventilations per minute and, therefore, within the target range of a maximum of 15 ventilations. However, in 34% of cases, the ventilation frequency was too high.&#x0D; This work shows that a systematic and automated evaluation of defibrillator recordings is suitable for assessing the quality of resuscitation measures. The determined parameters produced plausible results and are consistent with the results of preliminary studies at the Medical University of Graz, which were carried out manually on significantly smaller datasets.

Design of auto adjustable CPR assistive device for non-expertise usability scenarios

The proposal introduces a frugal device designed to optimize cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedures, offering a promising solution to enhance emergency medical care. In CPR, maintaining adequate chest compressions is crucial for sustaining blood circulation and oxygen supply to vital organs until professional medical help arrives. The proposed device addresses this challenge by continuously monitoring the pressure of chest compressions. When the pressure exceeds a preset threshold, the device automatically triggers the deflation of an airbag, thereby damping excess pressure and ensuring compression levels remain within the optimal range. This innovative approach not only improves the effectiveness of CPR delivery but also mitigates the risk of injury to the patient, as excessive compression force can cause rib fractures or other complications. By providing real-time feedback and assistance during CPR, the device has the potential to enhance the quality of care delivered by both trained professionals and lay rescuers, ultimately improving patient outcomes in emergency situations. Overall, the development of this frugal device represents a significant advancement in emergency medical technology,offering a cost- effective and accessible solution to optimize CPR procedures and save lives.

Automated external defibrillator delivery by a drone in a mountainous region to treat sudden cardiac arrest

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): ZOLL Introduction Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) poses a tough medical challenge with poor survival rates. Factors that may enable survival include resuscitation measures initiated by a bystander, early use of an automated external defibrillator (AED), and further performance of advanced life support. The latter will arrive on scene with an inevitable time-delay due to logistics challenges and potential AED unavailability, especially in rural areas. Here, drones might deliver an AED in order to increase the probability of survival. Methods Ten paramedics and nineteen medical laypersons were confronted with a person suffering from OHCA within a field test scenario in a mountainous region (Bodental, Carinthia, Austria) without detailed information. The scenario included a mock-call to the emergency response center responsible for the Austrian State Carinthia that dispatched a semi-autonomously flying drone towards the caller’s GPS coordinates. During the emergency call, participants should perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) measures and were informed that a drone delivers a training-AED. Various timepoints (time to (tt) emergency call, tt start CPR, tt drone start, tt first shock, hands-off times) as well as CPR quality were subject of analysis. Results The paramedics realized the cardiac arrest after 21 ± 11 seconds, the emergency call was performed after 40 ±43 seconds, the drone started after 5:15 ± 2:11 minutes and dropped off the AED after 10:52 ± 2:06 minutes, and the first shock was delivered after 12:15 ± 2:03 minutes. 70 % performed adequate chest compressions and 50 % provided sufficient mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Hands-off times were 50 ± 22 seconds. Only 37 % of the medical laypersons reported to know the algorithms for basic life support while 32 % performed adequate chest compressions and 68 % performed adequate mouth-to-mouth ventilation. In this group, the cardiac arrest was realized after 51 ±40 seconds, the emergency call was performed after 53 ±43 seconds, the drone started after 6:15 ± 1:33 minutes and dropped off the AED after 10:54 ± 1:56 minutes, and the first shock was delivered after 14:04 ± 2:10 minutes. Hands-off times were 2:11 ± 0:39 minutes. Conclusion The delivery and usage of an AED via a semi-autonomously flying drone in a remote region is feasible and safe. The drone delivery of an AED in mountainous regions can lead to early application of shocks. CPR quality performed by medical laypersons is suboptimal and emphasises the need for regular trainings.

Efficacy of distance training program for cardiopulmonary resuscitation utilizing smartphone application and home delivery system

Aim of the studyCommunity cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education is important for laypersons. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, with social distancing, conventional face-to-face CPR training was unavailable. We developed a distance learning CPR training course (HEROS-Remote) using a smartphone application that monitors real-time chest compression quality and a home delivery collection system for mannikins. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the HEROS-Remote course by comparing chest compression quality with that of conventional CPR training. MethodsWe applied layperson CPR education with HEROS-Remote and conventional education in Seoul during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both groups underwent a 2-min post-training chest compression test, and we tested non-inferiority. Chest compression depth, rate, complete recoil, and composite chest compression score was measured. Trainees completed a satisfaction survey on CPR education and delivery. The primary outcome was the mean chest compression depth. ResultsA total of 180 trainees were enrolled, with 90 assigned to each training group. Chest compression depth of HEROS-Remote training showed non-inferiority to that of conventional training (67.4 vs. 67.8, p = 0.78), as well as composite chest compression score (92.7 vs. 95.5, p = 0.16). The proportions of adequate chest compression depth, chest compression rate, and chest compressions with complete chest recoil were similar in both training sessions. In the HEROS-Remote training, 90% of the trainees were satisfied with CPR training, and 96% were satisfied with the delivery and found it convenient. ConclusionHEROS-Remote training was non-inferior to conventional CPR training in terms of chest compression quality. Distance learning CPR training using a smartphone application and mannikin delivery had high user satisfaction and was logistically feasible.

Abstract 308: Efficacy Of Distance Learning For Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Utilizing Smartphone App And Mannikin Delivery-collection System

Aim of the study: Effective CPR training is important for provision of high-quality bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, the COVID-19 pandemic has hindered conventional face-to-face CPR training. To overcome the limitation, we developed a distance learning CPR training course (HEROS-Remote) that utilized a smartphone app and a delivery-collection system for CPR training manikins. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the HEROS-Remote course by comparing chest compression quality between trainees who participated in the conventional CPR training (C-training) and HEROS-Remote course (R-training). Methods: The non-inferiority trial included adult nonhealthcare providers who applied for CPR training. Both groups underwent 2-minute post-training chest compression test followed by course survey on trainees’ course and delivery system satisfaction. The primary outcome of the study was mean chest compression depth during the 2-minute post-training test. Results: A total of 180 trainees were enrolled with 90 trainees for each training group. There was no statistically significant difference in chest compression depth between R-training and C-training groups (67.4 vs. 67.8, p=0.78) as well as proportion of adequate chest compression depth, chest compression rate, proportion of chest compressions with complete chest recoil and chest compression score (90.8 vs. 92.1, p=0.69; 110.8 vs. 110.4, p=0.60; 89.8 vs. 94.7, p=0.05; 92.7 vs. 95.5, p=0.16, respectively). In the R-training group, 90.0% of the trainees were satisfied with the course, 96% responded that the delivery system was satisfactory and convenient. Conclusion: The R-training course was noninferior to the C-training course. The distance learning CPR training method utilizing smartphone app and mannikin delivery-collection system had high user satisfaction and was logistically feasible.

Rescuers’ characteristics associated with the correct chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

AimTo analyse the caregivers’ physical, anthropometrical and educational characteristics associated with adequate chest compression and full chest recoil during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). MethodsAn observational prospective research study was conducted. Emergency and critical care health professionals and students performed two minutes of chest compressions on a dummy. Depth and residual leaning after the compressions were assessed and their association with several variables (physical, anthropometrical, and educational) was analysed using logistic regression models. ResultsTwo hundred thirty-eight volunteers participated. Previous experience of the rescuer in less than six CPRs (OR = 3.03; 95% CI 1.2–7.63) was related to a higher probability of not achieving an adequate depth of compressions. Greater height (OR: .93; 95% CI .87–.99) and grip strength (OR: .94; 95% CI .89–.99) were associated with correct performance of chest compression. We did not find any characteristic related to chest recoil. ConclusionsThe caregiver’s previous experience with CPR was the strongest factor associated with adequate performance of chest compressions. To a lesser extent, the professional’s height and upper body muscle strength also have an influence. No factors associated with the adequacy of full chest recoil were identified.

Effects of vertical compression during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the one-handed chest compression technique

ObjectiveThe posture of the rescuer while performing the one-handed chest compression (OHCC) has not yet been evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of vertical compression during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using the OHCC technique. MethodsThis was a prospective randomized crossover simulation trial. A total of 42 medical doctors conducted a 2-min single-rescuer CPR using the conventional OHCC (Test 1) or vertical OHCC (Test 2) technique on a pediatric manikin. The chest compression and ventilation parameters were measured in real time during the experiments using sensors embedded in the manikin. In addition, the compression force of each technique was measured using a force plate. ResultsThe average and adequate chest compression depth (CCD) were significantly higher in Test 2 than in Test 1 (average depth: 54.0 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 48.5–56.0) in Test 2 vs. 49.0 mm (IQR: 40.0–54.0) in Test 1, P < 0.001; adequate depth: 99.0% (IQR: 36.3–100.0) in Test 2 vs. 52.0% (IQR: 0.0–98.0) in Test 1, P < 0.001). The average force of compression was also significantly higher in vertical OHCC than that in conventional OHCC (25.7 kg ± 4.4 in vertical OHCC vs. 24.5 kg ± 4.2 in conventional OHCC, P < 0.001). The ventilation parameters were not significantly different between Tests 1 and 2. ConclusionsThe vertical OHCC could provide a deeper and more adequate CCD compared with the conventional OHCC, and the advantages of the vertical OHCC originate from the superiority of the compression force.

Quantitative assessment of chest compression techniques on an infant manikin.

Current cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines recommend the two-finger technique (TFT) of chest compression (CC) in infants for a single rescuer. We hypothesized that healthcare providers cannot achieve adequate CC depth with TFT, even if using real-time visual feedback (RVF). This was a cross-over study, randomizing participants to perform three sets of 2-min continuous CC, comparing (i) TFT with RVF, (ii) the one-hand technique (OHT) without RVF, and (iii) OHT with RVF. A standard CPR trainer manikin of a 3-month-old infant and a monitor/defibrillator that displays and records the quantitative CC quality were used. We set a target compression depth of 40-50 mm and a target compression rate of 100-120/min. Data were analyzed using the Friedman test and Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was defined as P-value of< 0.05. Fifty-nine healthcare providers participated in the study. The mean compression depth was 24 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 22-26 mm) in TFT with RVF and 43 mm (IQR, 38-48 mm) in OHT without RVF, P < 0.001. The proportion of adequate CC depth was 0% (IQR, 0-0%) in TFT with RVF, 22% (IQR, 5-54%) in OHT without RVF, and 62% (IQR, 29-83%) in OHT with RVF. The mean compression rate was within the target range in all three techniques. The TFT cannot produce the CC depth that meets the recommendation of the current CPR guidelines for an infant with RVF, whereas the OHT does.

Effect of synchronous online vs. face-to-face cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on chest compression quality: A pilot randomized manikin study

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of synchronous online and face-to-face cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training on chest compressions quality in a manikin model. A total of 118 fourth-year medical students participated in this study. The participants were divided into two groups: the online synchronous teaching group and the face-to-face group. Then, the participants were further randomly distributed to 1 of 2 feedback groups: online synchronous teaching and training with feedback devices (TF, n = 30) or without feedback devices (TN, n = 29) and face-to-face teaching and training with feedback devices (FF, n = 30) or without feedback devices (FN, n = 29). In the FN group and FF group, instructors delivered a 45-min CPR training program and gave feedback and guidance during training on site. In the TN group and TF group, the participants were trained with an online lecture via Tencent Meeting live broadcasting. Finally, participants performed a 2-min continuous chest compression (CC) during a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest scene without the audiovisual feedback (AVF) device. The outcome measures included CC depth, CC rate, proportions of appropriate depth (50-60 mm) and CC rate (100-120/min), percentage of correct hand location position, and percentage of complete chest recoil. There was little difference in the CC quality between the synchronous online training groups and the face-to-face training groups. There was no statistically significant difference in CC quality between the TN group and FN group. There were also no statistically significant differences between the TF and FF groups in terms of correct hand position, CC depth, appropriate CC depth, complete chest recoil or CC rate. However, the FF group had a higher appropriate CC rate than the TF group (p = 0.045). In the face-to-face training groups, the AVF device group had a significantly greater CC depth, appropriate CC depth, CC rate, and appropriate CC rate. However, there was a lack of statistically significant differences in terms of correct hand position (p = 0.191) and appropriate CC depth (p = 0.123). In the synchronous online training groups, the AVF device had little effect on the CC rate (p = 0.851) and increased the appropriate CC rate, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.178). Synchronous online training with an AVF device would be a potential alternative approach to face-to-face chest compression training. Synchronous online training with AVF devices seems to be a suitable replacement for face-to-face training to offer adequate bystander CPR chest compression training.

Características de los reanimadores asociadas a la correcta compresión torácica durante la reanimación cardiopulmonar

AimTo analyse the caregivers’ physical, anthropometrical and educational characteristics associated with adequate chest compression and full chest recoil during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). MethodsAn observational prospective research study was conducted. Emergency and critical care health professionals and students performed two minutes of chest compressions on a dummy. Depth and residual leaning after the compressions were assessed and their association with several variables (physical, anthropometrical, and educational) was analysed using logistic regression models. ResultsTwo hundred thirty-eight volunteers participated. Previous experience of the rescuer in less than six CPRs (OR: 3.03; CI 95%: 1.2-7.63) was related to a higher probability of not achieving an adequate depth of compressions. Greater height (OR: .93; 95% CI: .87-.99) and grip strength (OR: .94; 95% CI: .89-.99) were associated with correct performance of chest compression. We did not find any characteristic related to chest recoil. ConclusionsThe caregiver's previous experience with CPR was the strongest factor associated with adequate performance of chest compressions. To a lesser extent, the professional's height and upper body muscle strength also have an influence. No factors associated with the adequacy of full chest recoil were identified.

Effect of a dynamic mattress on chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

In-hospital cardiac arrest is a medical emergency that occurs on a regular basis. As patients most at risk for an in-hospital cardiac arrest are usually positioned on a dynamic mattress, it is important to measure the effect of mattress compressibility on chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). High-quality CPR is essential for patient survival and good neurological outcome. To examine the effect of an inflated dynamic overlay mattress on chest compression quality during CPR and to explore the predictive effect of health care providers' anthropometric factors, hand positioning and mattress type on chest compression frequency and depth. Manikin-based single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Nursing students (N=70) were randomised to a control (viscoelastic foam mattress) or intervention group (inflated dynamic overlay mattress on top of a viscoelastic foam mattress) and had to perform chest compressions over a 2-minute period. Compression rate, depth and hand positioning were registered. The 2015 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines were used as a reference. The mean difference in chest compression depth between control and intervention groups was 2.86 mm (P= .043). Both groups met the guidelines for adequate chest compression quality, as recommended by the ERC. A predictive effect of health care providers' body height and weight, mattress type and hand positioning on compression depth could be demonstrated (P= .004). CPR in bedridden patients on a dynamic overlay mattress has a negative effect on the quality of chest compressions. Mean chest compression depth decreases significantly. However, clinical significance of the results may be debatable. Mattress type, body weight and hand positioning appear to be significant predictors for adequate chest compression depth. A firm surface under the patient is needed during CPR. Special attention must be paid to correct hand positioning during CPR.

Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

1. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the foundation of resuscitation. New data reaffirm the key components of high-quality CPR: providing adequate chest compression rate and depth, minimizing interruptions in CPR, allowing full chest recoil between compressions, and avoiding excessive ventilation. 2. A respiratory rate of 20 to 30 breaths per minute is new for infants and children who are (a) receiving CPR with an advanced airway in place or (b) receiving rescue breathing and have a pulse. 3. For patients with nonshockable rhythms, the earlier epinephrine is administered after CPR initiation, the more likely the patient is to survive. 4. Using a cuffed endotracheal tube decreases the need for endotracheal tube changes. 5. The routine use of cricoid pressure does not reduce the risk ofd regurgitation during bag-mask ventilation and may impede intubation success. 6. For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bag-mask ventilation results in the same resuscitation outcomes as advanced airway interventions such as endotracheal intubation. 7. Resuscitation does not end with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Excellent post–cardiac arrest care is critically important to achieving the best patient outcomes. For children who do not regain consciousness after ROSC, this care includes targeted temperature management and continuous electroencephalography monitoring. The prevention and/or treatment of hypotension, hyperoxia or hypoxia, and hypercapnia or hypocapnia is important. 8. After discharge from the hospital, cardiac arrest survivors can have physical, cognitive, and emotional challenges and may need ongoing therapies and interventions. 9. Naloxone can reverse respiratory arrest due to opioid overdose, but there is no evidence that it benefits patients in cardiac arrest. 10. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis is based on patient response and requires frequent reassessment. Balanced crystalloid, unbalanced crystalloid, and colloid fluids are all acceptable for sepsis resuscitation. Epinephrine or norepinephrine infusions are used for fluid-refractory septic shock. More than 20 000 infants and children have a cardiac arrest per year in the …

Impact of personal protective equipment on the effectiveness of chest compression - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and objectivesTo assess the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) on different aspects of chest compression (CC) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we conducted this study.MethodsThis systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science from inception to June-6, 2020, limiting to the studies that reported the comparison of the effectiveness of CC in terms of CC rate, CC depth, the proportion of adequate CC rate, the proportion of adequate CC depth or proportion of adequate recoil; in study arms with or without PPE. Risk of bias was assessed by the ROB-2 and ROBINS-I tool. Quantitative data synthesis was done using the generic inverse variance method and the fixed-effects model.ResultsFive simulation-based studies were finally included. A Significant decrease in CC rate (SMD: -0.28, 95%CI: −0.47 to −0.10) and CC depth (SMD: -0.26, 95%CI: −0.44 to −0.07) were observed in the PPE arm as compared to the no-PPE arm. The difference in CC rate was more prominently seen in adult CPR than in paediatric CPR. Without PPE, the proportion of adequate CC rate delivered was 0.74, which reduced significantly to 0.60 after use of PPE (p − 0.035). Similarly, the proportion of adequate CC depth was significantly lesser (p − 0.001) in PPE arm (0.55), as compared to that of the no-PPE arm (0.78).ConclusionThe use of PPE compromises the quality of CC during CPR significantly, and newer ways to deliver chest compression has to be investigated.This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020192031).

352 Minimum Weight for Effective Chest Compressions and Alternative Methods for Smaller Rescuer Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

The quality and quantity of chest compressions determine blood flow in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Efficacious chest compressions rely on body mechanics such that the weight of the resuscitator matters; very small people have insufficient weight to generate sufficient downward chest compression force. The purpose of this study is to investigate how a resuscitator’s weight affects chest compression efficacy; and to determine the minimum weight required to perform adequate chest compressions. For those below this minimum weight (such as in children or smaller-bodied rescuers), we investigate alternative means to perform chest compressions. We enrolled volunteers age 8 years and above to perform video-recorded, compression-only CPR on an audible click-confirming chest compression manikin with background music to facilitate the chest compression rate for 2 minutes. All volunteers were provided with brief training, practice, and rest sessions prior to the recorded session. For all subjects, weight, height, age, sex, and CPR certification status were recorded. Subjects who failed to meet the criteria for efficacious chest compressions proceeded to two alternate chest compression modalities. In the first, subjects jumped up and down on the lower sternum while holding on to a horizontal support bar for balance. In the second, subjects used a squat-bounce method: sitting directly on the chest and using their legs, arms, and body weight to give compressions. Videos were reviewed to determine chest compression depth, rate, position, and recoil. An effective compression was one in which all four criteria were met. We enrolled 57 study subjects ranging from weights of 19 kg to 76 kg, which included 23 adults. Effective standard chest compressions declined at weights below 40 kg and no effective standard compression sessions occurred at weights below 29 kg (Figure 1). Adequate standard chest compressions declined at heights below 145 cm and no effective standard compression sessions were given at heights below 137 cm. For the 23 subjects who failed standard chest compressions, 19 (83%) were in the age group 8-10. There was no significant difference in the percentage of effective chest compressions with regard to sex in any method. Of the 23 subjects who failed, only 1 (4%) subject had taken a CPR certification course. Of the 23 subjects who failed standard chest compressions, 20 (87%) delivered effective compressions using the jumping modality. For 8 subjects who failed standard chest compressions, 7 (88%) delivered effective compressions using the squat-bouncing modality. Standard chest compression efficacy declines below 40 kg and cannot be performed adequately below 29 kg. For small resuscitators unable to perform standard compressions, jumping and squat-bouncing modalities resulted in sufficient chest compressions the majority of the time in this model; however, there are concerns regarding chest recoil and the potential for injury to the chest and abdomen.

Long-term benefits of chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation training using real-time visual feedback manikins: a randomized simulation study.

ObjectiveCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education with a feedback device is known to result in better CPR skills compared to one without the feedback device. However, its long-term benefits have not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term CPR skill retention after training using real-time visual manikins in comparison to that of non-feedback manikins.MethodsWe recruited 120 general university students who were randomly divided into the real-time feedback group (RTFG) and the non-feedback group. Of them, 95 (RTFG, 48; non-feedback group, 47) attended basic life support and automated external defibrillation training for 1 hour. For comparison of retention of CPR skills, the two groups were evaluated based on 2-minute chest compression performed immediately after training and at 3, 6, and 9 months. The CPR parameters between the two groups were also compared using a generalized linear model.ResultsAt immediately after training, the performance of RTFG was better in terms of average chest compression depth (51.9±1.1 vs. 45.5±1.1, p<0.001) and a higher percentage of adequate chest compression depth (51.0±4.1 vs. 26.9±4.2, p<0.001). This significant difference was maintained until 6 months after training, but there was no difference at 9 months after training. However, there was no significant difference in the chest compression rate and the correct hand position at any time point.ConclusionCPR training with a real-time visual feedback manikin improved skill acquisition in chest compression depth, but only until 6 months after the training. It could be a more effective educational method for basic life support training in laypersons.

IQ-CPR Meter for Chest Compression Monitoring During Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; a Comparative Study.

Adequate chest compression is crucial for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). There are several chest compression monitoring devices with different costs. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement rate of Improved Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation meter (IQ-CPR meter) and automated external defibrillator (AED) in chest compression quality monitoring. In this comparative study, participants were instructed to perform chest compression on the CPR manikins with the set rate of 110 times/minute for two minutes. The CPR manikins had two monitors: AED (R series®, Zoll company) and IQ-CPR meter. AED showed the depth and speed of chest compression on the screen, while IQ-CPR meter showed the depth of each chest compression by color light for quality of chest compression depth. Video-based analysis was used to compare the chest compression quality monitoring between the 2 devices. There were 27 participants in the study with a mean age and body mass index (standard deviation; SD) of 26.00 (5.65) years, and 22.93 (3.62) kg/m2 (70.37% male). The median (1st to 3rd quartile range) of chest compression experience was 3 (1.00-6.50) years. The mean (SD) of chest compression rate was 107 (5.29) times/minute. Based on Cohen's Kappa correlation, agreement between the IQ-CPR meter and the AED was 66.54%. The IQ-CPR meter had fair agreement with the computerized chest compression monitoring device with lower cost and simple, real time audiovisual feedback.

Quality of dispatcher-assisted vs. automated external defibrillator-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised simulation trial

Quality of hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an important determinant of resuscitation outcome for cardiac arrest patients cared for by lay rescuers. We designed a simulation trial to assess and compare the quality of CPR among untrained lay people under two different scenarios: automated external defibrillator (AED)-guided and dispatcher-assisted CPR. A simulation study was performed involving 42 volunteers selected by non-probabilistic sampling. Participants were randomized into two CPR simulation scenarios with a manikin: (A) AED-guided CPR and (T) dispatcher-assisted CPR. The quality of CPR was evaluated by metric monitoring of the chest compressions and timing of actions. Content analysis of the telephone instructions was performed by two independent researchers using a checklist. CPR was started in 20 of the 21 cases in scenario A and in all cases in scenario T. In total, 12 053 chest compressions were applied, 57.6% corresponding to scenario A. The proportion of compressions that were of an adequate depth was low in both cases, 15.3% in scenario A vs. 31.7% in scenario T (P < 0.001), while complete chest recoil was allowed in 66 and 72% (P < 0.001) of compressions, respectively. The AED advised to shock 91 times, and shocks were delivered in all cases. Although guided CPR helps untrained people to initiate resuscitation manoeuvres, the quality of CPR was poor in both groups. Telephone guidance improved the proportion of compressions that achieved adequate chest compression and recoil but did not optimise the compression rate.

Efficacy of Intravenous, Endotracheal, or Nasal Adrenaline Administration During Resuscitation of Near-Term Asphyxiated Lambs.

Objectives: Neonatal resuscitation guidelines recommend administering intravenous (IV) adrenaline if bradycardia persists despite adequate ventilation and chest compressions (CC). Rapid IV access is challenging, but little evidence exists for other routes of administration. We compared IV, endotracheal (ET), and intranasal routes for adrenaline administration during resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn lambs.Study design: Near-term lambs (n = 22) were delivered by caesarean section. Severe asphyxia was induced by clamping the umbilical cord while delaying ET ventilation until blood flow in the carotid artery ceased. Following a 30 s sustained inflation and ventilation for 30 s, we commenced uncoordinated CC at 90/min. We randomized four groups receiving repeated treatment doses (Tds) every 3rd min of (i) IV-Adrenaline (50 μg), (ii) ET-Adrenaline (500 μg), (iii) Nasal-Adrenaline via an atomizer (500 μg), and (iv) IV-saline. If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not achieved after three Tds by the assigned route, up to two rescue doses (Rds) of IV adrenaline were administered. Main outcome measures were achievement of ROSC and time from start of CC to ROSC, defined as heart rate >100/min, and mean carotid arterial pressure >30 mmHg.Results: In the IV-Adrenaline group, 5/6 lambs achieved ROSC after the first Td, whereas 1 lamb required two Tds before achieving ROSC. In the ET-Adrenaline group, 1/5 lambs required one Td, 1 lamb required three Tds, 2 lambs required 2 Rds, and 1 did not achieve ROSC. In the Nasal-Adrenaline group, 1/6 lambs required one Td, 2 required two Tds, whereas 3 lambs required either one (2 lambs) or two (1 lamb) Rds of adrenaline to achieve ROSC. In the IV-saline group, no lambs achieved ROSC until adrenaline Rds; 4/5 lambs required one Rd and 1 lamb required two Rds. Time to ROSC was shorter using IV-Adrenaline (2.4 ± 0.4 min) compared with ET-Adrenaline (10.3 ± 2.4 min), Nasal-Adrenaline (9.2 ± 2.2 min), and IV-saline (11.2 ± 1.2 min).Conclusion: IV adrenaline had superior efficacy compared with nasal or ET administration. Nasal administration had a similar effect as ET administration and is an easier route for early application. Nasal high-dose adrenaline administration for neonatal resuscitation merits further investigation.