Adequacy Of Prenatal Care Utilization Index Research Articles

Posttraumatic stress and prenatal care adequacy among Black/African American women

Black/African American women with trauma histories experience a disproportionate burden of adverse perinatal outcomes. One mechanism for this association is inadequate prenatal care, as avoidant symptoms are a hallmark of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The objective of this study is to examine the association between PTSD symptoms and adequacy of prenatal care among Black/African American women. This retrospective cohort study included all pregnant women who self-identified as Black/African American and were referred to a hospital’s integrated mental health program between 2017-2021. All participants completed a PTSD Checklist -Civilian Version (PCL-C) as a part of an initial mental health evaluation. The EHR was reviewed to codify adequacy of prenatal care, which was assessed in three ways: late initiation of prenatal care (defined as gestational age at the first prenatal visit > 12 weeks), the ratio of no-show to attended prenatal visits, and the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) Index. Bivariable analyses were performed. A propensity score for a positive PTSD screen was generated using confounders generated from a directed acyclic graph. This propensity score was included in multivariable models to control for imbalance across the exposure. Of the 111 women who met inclusion criteria, 57 (51%) screened positive on the PCL-C. Sample characteristics, stratified by a positive screen, are shown in Table 1. PCL-C score was associated with late initiation of prenatal care, the ratio of no-show to attended prenatal visits, and non-adequate prenatal care defined by the APNCU index (Table 2). The associations between late initiation of care and non-adequate APNCU index persisted in multivariable analyses. In this sample of pregnant Black/African American women with an identified mental health condition, PTSD symptoms were associated with inadequate prenatal care. The high prevalence of PTSD symptoms and the association with prenatal care emphasizes the importance of future research focused on trauma-related interventions for Black/African-American women.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

The impact of antenatal care utilization on admissions to neonatal intensive care units and perinatal mortality in Georgia.

IntroductionAppropriate antenatal care (ANC) utilization has direct, significant effects on perinatal mortality (PM). Georgia has one of the highest PM rates (11.7 per 1000 births) in Europe and launched a more intensive ANC programme in 2018.AimTo evaluate the associations between the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and PM in Georgia.MethodsThe Georgian Birth Registry (GBR), with linkage to the Vital Registration System, was used as the main data source; 148,407 eligible mothers and singleton newborns were identified during the observation period (2017–2019). The main exposure was ANC utilization, measured by the APNCU index, and the hospitalization registry was used to validate NICU admissions. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the associations between the exposure and outcomes while controlling for potential confounders.ResultsThe overall PM rate was 11.6/1000 births, and the proportion of newborns with a NICU admission was 7.8%. 85% of women initiated ANC before gestational age week 12. According to the APNCU index, 16% of women received inadequate, 10% intermediate, 38% adequate, and 36% intensive care. Women who received intermediate care had the lowest odds of PM (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.70), and newborns of women who received inadequate care had the highest odds of NICU admission (AOR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.09–1.23) and PM (AOR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02–1.36).ConclusionANC utilization is significantly associated with newborn asmissions to NICU and PM in Georgia. Women received inadequate care experienced the highest odds of newborn admissions to NICU and PM.

Influence of the Adequacy of the Prenatal Care Utilization Index on Small-For-Gestational-Age Infants and Preterm Births in the United States.

Little is known about the associations of Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants and preterm births. This study investigated the association between the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index in relation to small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants and preterm births. We used data from 212,050 pregnant women from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) between 2004 and 2011. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of the APNCU index on SGA infants and preterm births after controlling for maternal sociodemographic factors. Women who received adequate-plus prenatal care in reference to adequate prenatal care had increased odds for delivering SGA infants (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03–1.15). Women with 9–11 prenatal care visits had increased odds of delivering SGA infants (AOR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02–1.14) compared to those with more than 12 visits. Among the four APNCU index categories, the highest rate of preterm births was observed in the adequate-plus group. Compared to those with adequate prenatal care, women who received adequate-plus prenatal care had increased odds of preterm birth (AOR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.55–1.84). Compared to those with more than 12 visits, women with fewer than eight prenatal care visits had increased odds of preterm birth (AOR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.13–1.48). In conclusion, women in the adequate-plus APNCU index category were more likely to deliver SGA infants and to have preterm births compared to those in the adequate APNCU index category. Women in the U.S. with high-risk pregnancies were prone to receiving adequate-plus prenatal care. Future prospective studies are warranted to investigate the influence of APNCU index in relation to pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Measuring adequacy of prenatal care: does missing visit information matter?

Kotelchuck's Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) Index is frequently used to classify levels of prenatal care. In the Finger Lakes Region (FLR) of upstate New York, prenatal care visit information late in pregnancy is often not documented on the birth certificate. We studied the extent of this missing information and its impact on the validity of regional APNCU scores. We calculated the "weeks between" a mother's last prenatal care visit and her infant's date of birth. We adjusted the APNCU algorithm creating the Last Visit Adequacy of Prenatal Care (LV-APNC) Index using the last recorded prenatal care visit date as the end point of care and the expected number of visits at that time. We compared maternal characteristics by care level with each index, examining rates of reclassification and number of "weeks between" by birth hospital. Stuart-Maxwell, McNemar, chi-square, and t-tests were used to determine statistical significance. Based on 58,462 births, the mean "weeks between" was 2.8weeks. Compared with their APNCU Index score, 42.4 percent of mothers were reclassified using the LV-APNC Index. Major movement occurred from Intermediate (APNCU) to Adequate or Adequate Plus (LV-APNC) leaving the Intermediate Care group a more at-risk group of mothers. Those with Adequate or Adequate Plus Care (LV-APNC) increased by 31.6 percent, surpassing the Healthy People 2020 objective. In the FLR, missing visit information at the end of pregnancy results in an underestimation of mothers' prenatal care. Future research is needed to determine the extent of this missing visit information on the national level.

Factors associated with inadequacy of prenatal care utilization

To identify factors associated with inadequacy of prenatal care utilization in urban community. A cross-sectional study of a systematic sample stratified by maternity hospital, consisting of hospital births in the municipality of São Luís, Brazil, was carried out from March 1997 to February 1998. Socioeconomic and demographic factors, reproductive health, morbidity during pregnancy, and utilization of prenatal care services were studied. Mothers answered a standardized questionnaire before hospital discharge. The adequacy of prenatal care utilization was analyzed by means of two indexes: APNCU (Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization) and a new index based on the recommendations of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. There were interviewed 2,831 women who delivered at 10 public and private maternity hospitals. The inadequacy of prenatal care utilization was 49.2% according to the APNCU index and 24.5% when determined by the Brazilian index. Prenatal care at public services, low maternal schooling, low income, having no partner, and absence of maternal diseases during pregnancy were associated with inadequacy of prenatal care use according to both indexes. High parity and maternal age of 35 years or more were also associated with inadequacy, whereas primiparity, morbidity, and young maternal age (<20 years) seemed to protect from inadequacy when the Brazilian index was used. Prenatal care showed low coverage in the municipality of São Luís. The inadequacy of prenatal care utilization was associated with several factors linked to social inequality.

The “Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization” (APNCU) index to study low birth weight: Is the index biased?

A recent, nationwide study of 54 million births reported increasing trends toward more prenatal resource utilization from 1981 to 1995, when other indicators have shown worsening trends in birth outcomes. The Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) Index was used to measure resource utilization, but the Index appears to be biased because women grouped in the intensive category have the highest rates of low birth weight (LBW). The objective of this paper is to provide a systematic examination of the Index and to uncover biases that may preclude its use in analyzing the association between resource utilization and birth outcomes. This is a cross-sectional study including all singleton live births in 1993 through 1996 ( n = 591,403) in Ohio. Birth certificate data are used to derive the Index, which categorizes women as follows: Adequate Plus (A+), Adequate, Intermediate, and Inadequate. The Index is based on the ratio of observed to expected (O/E) number of prenatal visits. The expected number of visits is based on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations. The Index also considers the month of initiation of prenatal care. The outcome measures are low birth weight (LBW) and small-for-gestational age (SGA). The LBW rate is 11.8% in the (A+) category, compared to 9.4% in the Inadequate category, and 3.3% and 3.5% in each of the Intermediate and Adequate categories, respectively. Preterm births are disproportionately represented in the (A+) category: 61.2% of births prior to 37 weeks are (A+), whereas only 18.9% of term births are (A+). This apparent bias results from the fact that the ACOG schedule of prenatal visits allocates nearly one third of the total visits to the last 4–5 weeks of gestation. A shorter gestational age implies fewer number of expected visits, a smaller denominator in the O/E ratio, and O/E ratios exceeding 100% by large margins. In fact, the observed number of visits exceeds the expected number of visits by only one or two in 40.1% of all births grouped in the (A+) category. Consequently, the Index yields misleading results indicating that women grouped in the (A+) category (or O/E ratios > 110%) are most likely to deliver LBW infants. Contrary to the results obtained through the APNCU Index, our gestational age-specific analysis showed that increasing number of prenatal visits is associated with improved birth outcomes. We recommend that the use of the APNCU Index to study the association between prenatal resource utilization and LBW be discontinued.

Sources of prenatal care data and their association with birth outcomes of HIV-infected women.

Different sources of prenatal care data were used to examine the association between birth outcomes of HIV-infected women and the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index. Adjusted odds ratios of birth outcomes for 1858 HIV-positive mothers were calculated for APNCU indexes on the basis of birth certificate data or 3 types of physician visits on Medicaid claims. Claims- and birth certificate-based APNCU indexes agreed poorly (kappa < 0.3). Only the broadest claims-based APNCU index had lower adjusted odds ratios for low birthweight (0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49, 0.84) and preterm birth (0.70; 95% CI = 0.54, 0.91). The birth certificate-based index had a reduced adjusted odds ratio (0.73; 95% CI = 0.56, 0.95) only for preterm birth. The association of birth outcomes and adequacy of prenatal care in this HIV-infected cohort differed significantly depending on the source of prenatal care data.

Comparación de dos índices de asistencia a la atención prenatal y riesgo de parto pretérmino

A new index the adequacy of prenatal care utilization (APNCU) index, has been proposed to provide a more accurate and comprehensive measure of antenatal care use than the widely used Kessner index. To better understand the value of the two above mentioned indexes as predictors of preterm delivery, we examined their ability to predict women who will or will not deliver before 37 weeks of gestation. A case-control study was performed, including 207 cases and 381 controls. Prenatal care was assessed on the basis of the two above mentioned indexes, both taking into account the number of prenatal care visits, the date of the first visit and gestational age. Multiple-factor adjusted odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated using logistic regression methods. The Kessner index showed a lineal trend with both crude and adjusted for (the APNCU index) estimates of preterm delivery risk. The APNCU index did not show any linear trend with adjusted for (the Kessner index) estimates of preterm delivery risk. To assess whether the Kessner index added explanatory information to the APNCU index (or vice versa), the APNCU index was regressed on the Kessner index (and viceversa), and a set of residuals was computed for both indexes. In logistic regression analyses, the residuals of Kessner added meaningful information to the APNCU index, whereas the residuals of the APNCU index did not add any relevant information to the Kessner index. There results remained unchanged after controlling for several confounders. A variation in the definition of adequate prenatal care use changes the association between prenatal care and preterm delivery. The Kessner index showed a better ability for discriminating and predicting the risk of preterm delivery.