Adenosine In Ischemic Preconditioning Research Articles

Pharmacological preconditioning with adenosine A1 receptor agonist suppresses cellular immune response by an A2A receptor dependent mechanism

Under stressful conditions such as ischemia, sepsis, and severe trauma, adenosine levels are elevated and protect the tissue by interaction with G coupled receptors. In a model of peritonitis, we previously found that pharmacological preconditioning (PPC) of mice with a selective adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) agonist, 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), induced the A2AR which reduces cytokine secretion and leukocyte recruitment. In our present study we determined whether mice PPC will moderate cellular immune response by the same mechanism. Similar to the effect on inflammation, PPC reduced the response to lymphocyte mitogens and allogeneic MLR response. The inhibitory effect of PPC on the immune response was A1R and A2AR dependent as illustrated by experiments with antagonists of these receptors and mice with knock down (KO) receptors. In MLR with PPC splenocytes we found reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-15, TNF-α) and elevation of IL-10, as well as elevation of regulatory T-cell. Our data indicate that PPC is able to remarkably suppress cellular immune response due to the sensitization A2AR. This effect of PPC sheds light on the protective role of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning and makes this treatment candidate for the prevention of graft rejection.

Dueling nucleosides: cross-regulation of extracellular adenosine by guanosine. Focus on “Extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels”

<i>Dueling nucleosides: cross-regulation of extracellular adenosine by guanosine</i>. Focus on “Extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels”

Ischemic preconditioning modulates ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat lung: Role of adenosine receptors

Recent studies have been focused on the protective role of ischemic preconditioning against ischemia-reperfusion injury of the lung occurring following cardiopulmonary by-pass surgery and lung or heart transplantation. The present study was undertaken to investigate the role of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning in the isolated buffer-perfused rat lung. Since the pulmonary perfusion flow rate and left atrial pressure were constant, changes in pulmonary arterial pressure directly reflect changes in pulmonary vascular resistance. When compared to control values, ischemia-reperfusion injury in the form of 2 h of normothermic ischemia significantly reduced the pulmonary vasoconstrictor response to phenylephrine and KCl, increased wet-to-dry lung weight ratios and increased malondialdehyde content of rat lungs. Ischemic preconditioning in the form of one cycle of 5 min of ischemia and reperfusion applied prior to ischemia-reperfusion, as well as, adenosine preconditioning in the form of adenosine infusion prior to ischemia-reperfusion independently prevented the reduction in pulmonary vasoconstrictor responses and the increases in pulmonary edema and malondialdehyde formation in response to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Pretreatment with adenosine receptor antagonists, theophylline or 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropyl xanthine (DPCPX) prior to ischemic preconditioning or adenosine preconditioning abolished the protective effects of preconditioning by ischemic preconditioning and adenosine preconditioning. The present data demonstrate that ischemic preconditioning and adenosine preconditioning prevent the vascular and biochemical alterations studied in response to ischemia-reperfusion injury in the pulmonary vascular bed of the rat. Results of the present study suggest activation of adenosine A 1 receptors mediates the protective properties of ischemic preconditioning and adenosine preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the lung. Moreover, the present data further suggest selective adenosine receptor agonists may be useful as pharmacologic preconditioning agents in preventing ischemia-reperfusion injury in lung transplantation and other forms of pulmonary vascular ischemia.

Complementary role of extracellular ATP and adenosine in ischemic preconditioning in the rat heart.

Although adenosine is an important mediator of ischemic preconditioning (IPC), its relative contribution to IPC remains unknown. Because adenosine is formed through the hydrolysis of ATP, the present study investigated the role of ATP and adenosine in IPC. Isolated and buffer-perfused rat hearts underwent IPC by three cycles of 5-min ischemia and 5-min reperfusion before 25 min of global ischemia. The rate-pressure product (RPP) 30 min after reperfusion was taken as an endpoint of functional protection. Interstitial fluid (ISF) adenine nucleotides and adenosine were measured by cardiac microdialysis techniques. Inhibition of IPC-induced recovery of RPP was partial by the adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (SPT; 100 microM) or by the structurally distinct P2Y purinoceptor antagonists suramin (300 microM) or reactive blue (RB; 10 microM) but was additive when SPT was given with suramin or RB. The P2X antagonist pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid tetrasodium (50 microM) had no effect on functional protection. The improved functional recovery was not significantly affected by an ecto-5'-nucleotidase inhibitor, alpha,beta-methylene adenosine diphosphate (AMP-CP; 100 microM), alone but was inhibited by AMP-CP plus SPT, suramin, or RB. ISF ATP and adenosine increased temporarily by 10-fold during IPC. AMP-CP augmented the increase in ISF ATP associated with the decrease in ISF adenosine. There was a reciprocal correlation between the ISF concentration of ATP and adenosine in preconditioned hearts. In addition, there was a significant correlation between ISF adenosine and ATP and the inhibitory potency of SPT and suramin or RB against functional protection conferred by IPC. These results suggest that extracellular ATP and adenosine play a complementary role in IPC through P2Y purinoceptors and adenosine receptors, respectively.

Role of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning in rats depends critically on the duration of the stimulus and involves both A(1) and A(3) receptors.

There is currently general agreement that adenosine is not involved in ischemic preconditioning (IP) in rat hearts. We hypothesized that the failure to show a role for adenosine is due to the use of brief preconditioning stimuli, and therefore investigated whether adenosine is involved when longer stimuli are employed and which receptor subtypes are involved. Infarct size (IS) was determined in anesthetized rats after 180 min of reperfusion (REP) following a 60-min coronary artery occlusion (CAO). IS was 69+/-2% (n=15) of the risk area in control rats and 45+/-2% (n=19; P<0.05) following IP by a single 15-min CAO. The non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist SPT, which itself had no effect on IS (74+/-1%), blunted the protection by IP (IS=57+/-2%, P<0.05) in a dose of 2 x 5 mg/kg i.v., and abolished the protection (IS=70+/-1%) at 2 x 25 mg/kg i.v. Following IP by three cycles of 3-min CAO and 3-min REP, IS was 24+/-6% (P<0.05), which was not affected by SPT in doses of 2 x 10 and 2 x 25 mg/kg i.v. The A(3) antagonist MRS-1191 (3.3 mg/kg, i.p.), which itself did not affect IS (70+/-2%), blunted the protection by IP with a 15-min CAO (IS=54+/-2%, P<0.05). When 2 x 5 mg/kg SPT (a dose selective for A(1)-receptors, as it did not affect the protection by the A(3) selective agonist IB-MECA, 51+/-3%) and MRS 1191 were combined the protection by IP was abolished (IS=67+/-2%). Involvement of adenosine in IP in rats depends critically on the duration of the stimulus. Thus, whereas adenosine was not involved when stimuli of 3-min duration were employed, activation of both A(1) and A(3) receptors contributed when a stimulus of 15 min was used.

Involvement of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning in the rat heart depends critically on the stimulus duration

Involvement of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning in the rat heart depends critically on the stimulus duration

The liver protective effect of ischemic preconditioning may be mediated by adenosine

We investigated the involvement of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning (IPC) by the unspecific antagonist, 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT). Anesthetized Wistar rats were treated as follows: 1. non-ischemic controls, 2. ischemic controls: 60 min of clamping of the common hepatic artery followed by 60 min reperfusion, 3. IPC: 10 min ischemia followed by 15 min reperfusion, prior to the identical ischemia-reperfusion (IR) period as in group 2, 4. 8-PT + IPC: 8-PT 10 mg/kg i. v. was given 10 min prior to the identical procedure as in group 3. The peripheral liver blood flow was monitored by laser-Doppler flowmetry. Blood alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was analyzed once every 60 min. IPC significantly reduced impairment of liver blood flow, as well as ALT increase during reperfusion. This effect was abolished by pretreatment with 8-PT. Adenosine appears to be a crucial effector in IPC. Clinical studies need to be undertaken to explore a possible effect of IPC in liver transplantation.

The liver protective effect of ischemic preconditioning may be mediated by adenosine.

We investigated the involvement of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning (IPC) by the unspecific antagonist, 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT). Anesthetized Wistar rats were treated as follows: 1. non-ischemic controls, 2. ischemic controls: 60 min of clamping of the common hepatic artery followed by 60 min reperfusion, 3. IPC: 10 min ischemia followed by 15 min reperfusion, prior to the identical ischemia-reperfusion (IR) period as in group 2, 4. 8-PT + IPC: 8-PT 10 mg/kg i.v. was given 10 min prior to the identical procedure as in group 3. The peripheral liver blood flow was monitored by laser-Doppler flowmetry. Blood alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was analyzed once every 60 min. IPC significantly reduced impairment of liver blood flow, as well as ALT increase during reperfusion. This effect was abolished by pretreatment with 8-PT. Adenosine appears to be a crucial effector in IPC. Clinical studies need to be undertaken to explore a possible effect of IPC in liver transplantation.

Low concentrations of adenosine receptor blocker decrease protection by hypoxic preconditioning in ischemic rat hearts.

A role for adenosine in ischemic preconditioning and hypoxic preconditioning (HP) has been established in several species but is controversial in rats, due in part to the inconsistency of the data from the different experimental design. Our objective was to investigate the role of adenosine in the protection of the ischemic myocardium by HP in rats. perfused hearts isolated from Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 5 min of hypoxic perfusion before 25 min of global ischemia followed by 20 min of reperfusion. The effects of adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-(p-sulfophenyl)-theophylline (8SPT) on HP-based changes in left-ventricular function, energy metabolites, and release of creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase were determined. To minimise non-specific effects of 8SPT, low concentrations of agent (0.5 or 1.0 micro mol/l) were used. 8SPT alone had no deleterious effects on normoxically perfused hearts or on ischemic/reperfused hearts. HP improved the recovery of LV function and creatine phosphate, and reduced the release of enzymes during reperfusion. 8SPT (1.0 micromol/l) ameliorated the beneficial effect of HP on cardiac function, but did not reverse the reduction in release of enzymes by HP completely. results suggest that the protective effect of HP on myocardial contractile function may be mediated by receptor(s) that can be inhibited by low concentrations of antagonist but may not have a primary role in the reduction of cellular damage by HP in rats.

Effector mechanism of adenosine in acute ischemic preconditioning of skeletal muscle against infarction.

We used adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-1(phenyl-2R-isopropyl)-adenosine (PIA), A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), and ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel blockers sodium 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD) and glibenclamide (Glib), as probes to investigate the role and mechanism of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning (IPC) of noncontractile skeletal muscle against infarction, using the pig latissimus dorsi muscle flap model. Except for Glib, all drugs were delivered to each muscle flap by 10-min local intra-arterial infusion to avoid systemic effects. Muscle flaps that were subjected to 4 h of global ischemia and 48 h of reperfusion sustained 40 +/- 2% infarction. IPC with three cycles of 10 min ischemia and reperfusion, preischemic adenosine, or PIA treatment reduced (P < 0.05) muscle infarction to 24 +/- 2, 18 +/- 2, and 24 +/- 2%, respectively. The anti-infarction effect of IPC and adenosine was blocked by DPCPX, 5-HD, and Glib (P < 0.05). Preischemic adenosine treatment also maintained higher muscle contents of phosphocreatine, ATP, and energy charge potential and lower muscle contents of dephosphorylated metabolites and lactate during ischemia and a lower muscle myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity during reperfusion compared with the control (P < 0.05). Preischemic adenosine treatment did not increase muscle content of adenosine during ischemia or reperfusion. Furthermore, adenosine given at the onset of reperfusion was not effective in attenuating muscle MPO activity or infarction. Taken together, these observations indicate that adenosine, through A1 receptors, initiates the mechanism of IPC with postreceptor involvement of KATP channels in skeletal muscle. However, adenosine is unlikely to play a key role in the effector mechanism. Presently, the cause and role of energy sparing and neutrophil inhibitory effects associated with the anti-infarction effect of preischemic adenosine treatment are unknown.

Adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular system

The remarkably comprehensive qualitative description of the cardiovascular actions of adenosine by Drury and Szent-Gyorgyi [(1929): J Physiol 6:213-237] serves as a framework for current research on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of those actions. This article reviews eight areas in this field that have advanced significantly during the past 5 years: (1) the kinds of potassium channels coupled to the cardiomyocyte A 1 AR; (2) the mechanism of the anti-adrenergic action of adenosine; (3) the role of adenosine in angina pectoris; (4) the role of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning; (5) the occurrence of A 2 AR in ventricular myocytes; (6) evidence for A 1 -, A 2A -, A 2B - and A 3 ARs in blood vessels; (7) the role of nitric oxide in adenosine-initiated vasodilation; and (8) the effect of adenosine on microvascular permeability. In some areas, solid evidence has defined a particular mechanism; in others, the evidence is as yet incomplete.