Adenocarcinoma Of The Esophagogastric Junction Research Articles

The Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy with Double-Tract Reconstruction versus Laparoscopy-Assisted Total Gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y Reconstruction for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Multicenter Study Based on Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Purpose. To compare the antireflux effect, long-term nutritional levels, and quality of life (QoL) between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction (LPG-DTR) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (LTG-RY) for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methods. This multicenter retrospective cohort study collected clinicopathological and follow-up data of AEG patients from January 2016 to January 2021 at five high-volume surgery centers. The study included patients who underwent digestive tract reconstruction with LPG-DTR or LTG-RY after tumor resection. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to minimize confounding factors. The comparison after PSM included postoperative complications, reflux esophagitis, long-term nutritional levels, and QoL. Results. A total of 151 consecutive patients underwent either LPG-DTR or LTG-RY. After PSM, 50 patients from each group were included in the analysis. The frequency of reflux esophagitis and Clavien–Dindo classification did not significantly differ between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 year after surgery, the LPG-DTR group showed significantly higher weight and hemoglobin levels than the LTG-RY group (P<0.05). The overall postoperative Visick grade differed significantly between the groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with Visick≥III (P>0.05). Conclusion. Both LPG-DTR and LTG-RY are safe and feasible methods for digestive tract reconstruction in patients with AEG. Both methods have similar antireflux effects and postoperative QoL. However, LPG-DTR resulted in superior nutritional levels compared to LTG-RY. Therefore, LPG-DTR is considered a relatively effective method for digestive tract reconstruction in AEG patients.

The development and validation of automated machine learning models for predicting lymph node metastasis in Siewert type II T1 adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is considered an essential prognosis factor for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), which also affects the treatment strategies of AEG. We aimed to evaluate automated machine learning (AutoML) algorithms for predicting LNM in Siewert type II T1 AEG. A total of 878 patients with Siewert type II T1 AEG were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to develop the LNM predictive models. The patients from two hospitals in Suzhou were collected as the test set. We applied five machine learning algorithms to develop the LNM prediction models. The performance of predictive models was assessed using various metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve (AUC), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Patients with LNM exhibited a higher proportion of male individuals, a poor degree of differentiation, and submucosal infiltration, with statistical differences. The deep learning (DL) model demonstrated relatively good accuracy (0.713) and sensitivity (0.868) among the five models. Moreover, the DL model achieved the highest AUC (0.781) and sensitivity (1.000) in the test set. The DL model showed good predictive performance among five AutoML models, indicating the advantage of AutoML in modeling LNM prediction in patients with Siewert type II T1 AEG.

Adjuvant Treatment with S-1 in Patients after R0-Resection of Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Esophagogastric Junction: A Multicenter Phase I/II Feasibility Study (GMBH-STO-0114)

Introduction: S-1 has been shown to be an effective adjuvant treatment option for East Asian patients who underwent gastrectomy for stage II/III gastric cancer. We conducted a phase I/II study to evaluate the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of administering S-1 in the adjuvant setting after R0-resection of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in Caucasian patients. Methods: In this single-cohort, open-label, phase I/II trial, we enrolled patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or EGJ having undergone R0-resection with or without neoadjuvant treatment. One treatment cycle consisted of oral S-1 (30 mg/m2 bid) for 14 days. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for 18 cycles (54 weeks). Primary endpoint was feasibility and tolerability. Safety was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Secondary endpoints were 1-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate, RFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: Between October 2015 and February 2018, 32 patients were enrolled in 12 German centers, and 30 started adjuvant study treatment. Seventeen patients completed all 18 cycles. Two patients terminated study treatment early due to adverse events (AEs), 7 due to patient’s or investigator’s decision, and 4 due to recurrence or distant metastasis during adjuvant therapy. Dose levels were reduced to 25 mg/m2 in 9 patients and to 20 mg/m2 in 1 patient. Of patients completing all 18 cycles, 5 did so with reduced dosage of S-1. Documented grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting, polyneuropathy, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, and rash. Serious AEs were observed in 7 patients. Median RFS was 32.2 months. One-year RFS rate was 77%. Data on OS were still premature at the end of the study. Conclusion: Adjuvant treatment with S-1 for 1 year is a feasible and safe treatment option for Caucasian patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma or cancer of the EGJ after R0-resection.

The impact of the length of proximal margin on the prognosis of adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction and strategies:A real-world study

BackgroundThe optimal proximal margin (PM) length for Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the optimal PM length using an abdominal approach to guide surgical decision-making. MethodsA prospective study analyzed 304 consecutive patients diagnosed with Siewert II/III AEJ between January 2019 and December 2021. Total gastrectomy was performed via the abdominal approach, and PM length was measured on fixed gross specimens. X-Tile software determined the optimal PM cut-point based on progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics across PM groups, while survival analyses utilized Kaplan–Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards regression for assessing the impact of margin length on survival. Multivariable analyses were conducted to adjust for confounding variables. ResultsThe study included 264 AEJ cases classified as Siewert II (71.97%) or III (28.03%). The median gross PM length was 1.0 cm (IQR: 0.5 cm–1.5 cm, range: 0 cm–6 cm). PM length ≥1.2 cm was associated with a lower risk of disease progression compared to PM length 0.4 cm on PFS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.20–0.84, P = 0.015). Moreover, PM ≥ 1.2 cm improved prognosis in subgroups of T4 or N3, tumor size <4 cm, Siewert II, and Lauren classification. ConclusionsFor Siewert type II/III AEJ, a proximal margin length ≥1.2 cm (1.65 cm in situ) is associated with improved outcomes. These findings offer valuable insights into the association between PM length and outcomes in Siewert II/III AEJ, providing guidance for surgical approaches and aiding clinical decision-making to enhance patient outcomes.

Cancer of the Esophagogastric Junction: Double Tract Reconstruction - Evidence and Technique

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) still represent a certain surgical challenge. In contrary to the trend of thoracoabdominal surgery for AEG I and AEG II cancer, the proximal gastrectomy is regaining popularity through new reconstruction methods such as the double tract reconstruction. Proximal gastrectomy followed by double tract reconstruction represents an alternative for the thoracoabdominal approach for suitable AEG II cancer and an alternative to the total gastrectomy for AEG III cancers. Latest studies suggest a functional benefit of proximal gastrectomy and double tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy. The accurate indication for proximal gastrectomy for locally advanced cancers has to be established in the near future as well as the influence of the size of the remnant stomach on the outcome, as Asian techniques for early lesions sometimes significantly differ from European. The following article reflects the present evidence on proximal gastrectomy and double tract reconstruction as well as technical aspects in the context of cancer of the esophagogastric junction.

Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: Still searching for the right treatment transabdominal or transthoracic surgical approaches?

To date, the discussion is still ongoing whether the Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) should be resected either by thoracoabdominal esophagectomy or gastrectomy with resection of the distal esophagus by transhiatal extension. The aim of our study was to compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of the transthoracic approach (TTA) and the transabdominal approach (TAA). Searches of electronic databases identifying studies from Cochrane, PubMed and Google Scholar were performed. Randomised and non-randomised studies comparing TTA and TAA approaches for surgical treatment of AEG Siewert type II were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa and Jada scales were used to evaluate methodological quality. The risk of bias was assessed using the Rob v2 and Robins-I tools. Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes. We included 17 trials (2 randomised controlled trials and 15 cohorts) involving 15297 patients. Longer three-year overall survival, five-year overall survival and R0 resection rates were observed in the TTA group. However, TTA had greater morbidity and pulmonary complications. Transthoracic approach appears to be preferable for selected Siewert II tumours. This may lead to higher survival rates and better R0 resection rate. Well-designed studies are needed to confirm the results of this systematic review.

Preoperative ultrasound-guided dual localization with titanium clips and carbon nanoparticles for predicting the surgical approach and guiding the resection of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

ObjectiveTo investigate the superiority of preoperative ultrasound-guided titanium clip and nanocarbon dual localization over traditional methods for determining the surgical approach and guiding resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).MethodThis study included 66 patients with Siewert type II AEG who were treated at the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force 900th Hospital between September 1, 2021, and September 1, 2023. They were randomly divided into an experimental group (n = 33), in which resection was guided by the dual localization technique, and the routine group (n = 33), in which the localization technique was not used. Surgical approach predictions, proximal esophageal resection lengths, pathological features, and the occurrence of complications were compared between the groups.ResultThe use of the dual localization technique resulted in higher accuracy in predicting the surgical approach (96.8% vs. 75.9%, P = 0.02) and shorter proximal esophageal resection lengths (2.39 ± 0.28 cm vs. 2.86 ± 0.39 cm, P < 0.001) in the experimental group as compared to the routine group, while there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications (22.59% vs. 24.14%, P = 0.88).ConclusionPreoperative dual localization with titanium clips and carbon nanoparticles is significantly superior to traditional methods and can reliably delineate the actual infiltration boundaries of Siewert type II AEG, guide the surgical approach, and avoid excessive esophageal resection.

Exploring the Prognostic Efficacy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

Objective: To investigate the value of machine learning and traditional Cox regression models in predicting postoperative survivorship in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methods: This study analyzed clinicopathological data from 203 patients. The Cox proportional risk model and four machine learning models were constructed and internally validated. ROC curves, calibration curves, and clinical decision curves (DCA) were generated. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), while calibration curves determined the fit and clinical significance of the model. Results: The AUC values of the 3-year survival in the validation set for the Cox regression model, extreme gradient boosting, random forest, support vector machine, and multilayer perceptron were 0.870, 0.901, 0.791, 0.832, and 0.725, respectively. The AUC values of 5-year survival in the validation set for each model were 0.915, 0.916, 0.758, 0.905, and 0.737, respectively. The internal validation AUC values for the four machine learning models, extreme gradient boosting, random forest, support vector machine, and multilayer perceptron, were 0.818, 0.772, 0.804, and 0.745, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with Cox regression models, machine learning models do not need to satisfy the assumption of equal proportionality or linear regression models, can include more influencing variables, and have good prediction performance for 3-year and 5-year survival rates of AEG patients, among which, XGBoost models are the most stable and have significantly better prediction performance than other machine learning methods and are practical and reliable.

Assessment of risk factors of lymph node metastasis and prognosis of Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: A retrospective study.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has a high incidence, and the extent of lymph node dissection (LND) and its impact on prognosis remain controversial. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognosis in Siewert II/III AEG patients. A retrospective review of 239 Siewert II/III AEG patients surgically treated at Beijing Friendship Hospital from July 2013 to December 2022 was conducted. Preoperative staging was conducted via endoscopy, ultrasound gastroscopy, CT, and biopsy. Depending on the stage, patients received radical gastrectomy with LND and chemotherapy. Clinicopathological data were collected, and survival was monitored semiannually until November 2023. Utilizing logistic regression for data analysis and Cox regression for survival studies, multivariate analysis identified infiltration depth (OR = 0.038, 95% CI: 0.011-0.139, P < .001), tumor deposit (OR = 0.101, 95% CI: 0.011-0.904, P = .040), and intravascular cancer embolus (OR = 0.234, 95% CI: 0.108-0.507, P < .001) as independent predictors of LNM. Lymph nodes No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, and 11 were more prone to metastasis in the abdominal cavity. Notably, Siewert III AEG patients showed a higher metastatic rate in nodes No. 5 and No. 6 compared to Siewert II. Mediastinal LNM was predominantly found in nodes No. 110 and No. 111 for Siewert II AEG, with rates of 5.45% and 3.64%, respectively. A 3-year survival analysis underscored LNM as a significant prognostic factor (P = .001). Siewert II AEG patients should undergo removal of both celiac and mediastinal lymph nodes, specifically nodes No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 110, and 111. Dissection of nodes No. 5 and No. 6 is not indicated for these patients. In contrast, Siewert III AEG patients do not require mediastinal LND, but pyloric lymphadenectomy for nodes No. 5 and No. 6 is essential. The presence of LNM is associated with poorer long-term prognosis. Perioperative chemotherapy may offer a survival advantage for AEG patients.

Postoperative superior anastomotic leakage classification and treatment strategy for postoperative esophagogastric junction cancer.

At present, anastomotic fistula cannot be avoided after adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Once the anastomotic leakage occurs, the posterior mediastinum and the left thoracic cavity are often seriously infected, which further impairs respiratory and circulatory function, heightening the danger of the disease course. The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of superior anastomotic leakage after surgery for AEG and recommend corresponding treatment strategies to improve the diagnosis and treatment of superior anastomotic leakage after surgery for AEG. The clinical data of 57 patients with superior anastomotic leakage after surgery for AEG in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2017 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 27 cases referred from external hospitals and 30 cases at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University. According to the diameter and risk level of anastomotic leakage, the high anastomotic leakage is divided into types I, II, III, and IV. Patients with preoperative comorbidities or those treated with the transabdominal approach or laparoscopic surgery often had type I and type II anastomotic leakage; meanwhile, patients with preoperative comorbidities and sacral perforation or those treated with a thoracic and abdominal approach or open surgery often had type III and IV fistula. The difference between types I-II and types III-IV was statistically significant (P<0.05). The mortality rate of patients with type III and type IV leakage was 14.8% within 90 days after operation, while no deaths occurred among patients with type I and type II leakage, and the difference in mortality between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). After surgery for AEG, suitable treatment measures should be adopted according to the type of superior anastomotic leakage that occurs. Types III and IV superior anastomotic leakages are associated with higher mortality and require greater attention from surgeons.

Comparative single-cell analysis reveals heterogeneous immune landscapes in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is a type of tumor that arises at the anatomical junction of the esophagus and stomach. Although AEG is commonly classified as a subtype of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), the tumor microenvironment (TME) of AEG remains poorly understood. To address this issue, we conducted single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on tumor and adjacent normal tissues from four AEG patients and performed integrated analysis with publicly available GAC single-cell datasets. Our study for the first time comprehensively deciphered the TME landscape of AEG, where heterogeneous AEG malignant cells were identified with diverse biological functions and intrinsic malignant nature. We also depicted transcriptional signatures and T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires for T cell subclusters, revealing enhanced exhaustion and reduced clone expansion along the developmental trajectory of tumor-infiltrating T cells within AEG. Notably, we observed prominent enrichment of tumorigenic cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the AEG TME compared to GAC. These CAFs played a critical regulatory role in the intercellular communication network with other cell types in the AEG TME. Furthermore, we identified that the accumulation of CAFs in AEG might be induced by malignant cells through FGF-FGFR axes. Our findings provide a comprehensive depiction of the AEG TME, which underlies potential therapeutic targets for AEG patient treatment.

Imaging of Barium Esophagogram and Abdominal Computed Tomography of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: Case Report

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is one of the most common cancers in the world, with an estimated mortality rate 1 million deaths each year. In this case we report a patient with symptom of dysphagia for the last 3 months. Esophagogram and Abdominal Computed Tomography were performed to diagnosis and determine the staging of the disease. Pathological examination and endoscopy are also needed to support diagnosis. This case highlights the utility of radiological findings, supported by other examinations to determine the diagnosis of Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction.

Outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Development and validation of a nomogram for Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Due to the complex histological type and anatomical structures, there has been considerable debate on the classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), especially Siewert II AEG. Furthermore, neither the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) [esophageal adenocarcinoma (E) or gastric cancer (G)] nor the AJCC 8th TNM (E or G) accurately predicted the prognosis of patients with Siewert II AEG. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the survival and prognosis of patients with Siewert II AEG and establish a new and better prognostic predictive model. A retrospective study. Patients with Siewert II AEG, retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases, were assigned to the training set. Patients retrieved from a single tertiary medical center were assigned to the external validation set. Significant variables were selected using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to construct the nomogram. Nomogram models were assessed using the concordance index (C-index), a calibration plot, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation. Age, tumor grade, and size, as well as the T, N, and M stages, were included in the nomograms. For the SEER training set, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.683 (0.665-0.701). The C-index of the nomogram for the external validation set was 0.690 (0.653-0.727). The calibration curve showed good agreement between the nomogram estimations and actual observations in both the training and external validation sets. The DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically useful. The new predictive model showed significant accuracy in predicting the prognosis of Siewert II AEG.

Clinical outcomes of the robot-assisted Ivor Lewis procedure for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with semi-instrument overlap intrathoracic anastomosis.

The main difficulty of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (IL) procedure for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ) is the intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (IEA). We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of the IL procedure with the da Vinci surgical system for treatment of AEGJ with semi-mechanical intrathoracic IEA. The cohort included 72 patients with AEGJ who received treatment at the Department of Minimally Invasive Esophagus Surgery of the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from August 2020 to March 2023. Of these 72 patients, 17 received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy. The robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure was performed using a linear stapler for overlap side-to-side intrathoracic anastomosis and the stapler defect was closed with double full-layer continuous sutures by robotic hand-sewn (semi-mechanical) IEA. Of the 72 AEGJ patients, 2 were converted to exploration, 7 were converted to laparotomy and thoracotomy for circular-stapled intrathoracic anastomosis, and 6 were converted to thoracotomy for circular-stapled anastomosis, which included 2 cases of extensive pleural adhesion and 4 cases of overlap anastomosis failure, whereas 57 underwent the robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure with semi-mechanical IEA. Among the 9 patients converted to laparotomy, the laparotomy rate was closely related to the Siewert classification (P<0.005) and preoperative use of neoadjuvant therapy (P<0.05). Among the 57 patients who underwent the robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure with semi-mechanical IEA, there were 2 cases of anastomotic leakages (2/57, 3.5%), no case of anastomotic stricture, 5 cases of postoperative pneumonia (5/57, 8.77%), 2 cases of intensive care unit admission (2/57, 3.5%), and 1 case of readmission within 30 days (1/57, 1.75%). None of the patients died within 30 days after surgery. The robot-assisted minimally invasive IL procedure with semi-mechanical IEA is both safe and feasible for AEGJ. However, caution is advised for patients with Siewert type III AEGJ and those who have already received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.

Usefulness of the preoperative inflammation-based prognostic score and the ratio of visceral fat area to psoas muscle area on predicting survival for surgically resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Sarcopenic obesity is associated with gastrointestinal cancer prognosis through systemic inflammation. However, in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), the relationship between the inflammation-based prognostic score (IBPS), muscle loss, visceral fat mass, and prognosis has not been sufficiently evaluated. We investigated the prognostic value of the preoperative IBPS and the visceral fat area ratio to the psoas muscle area (V/P ratio) in patients with AEG undergoing surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 92 patients with AEG who underwent surgery. The prognostic value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, systemic inflammation response index, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, prognostic nutritional index, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and V/P ratio at the third lumbar vertebra was investigated using univariate and multivariate survival analyses. Multivariate analysis revealed that a high pathological stage (p = 0.0065), high PLR (p = 0.0421), and low V/P ratio (p = 0.0053) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival (OS). When restricted to patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25kg/m2, a high V/P ratio was a poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0463) for OS. Conversely, when restricted to patients with BMI < 25kg/m2, a low V/P ratio was a poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0021) for OS. Both PLR and V/P ratios may be useful prognostic biomarkers in surgical cases of AEG. V/P ratio and BMI may provide an accurate understanding of the muscle and fat mass's precise nature and may help predict AEG prognosis.

Marital Status Is a Prognostic Factor for Cardiovascular Mortality but Not a Prognostic Factor for Cancer Mortality in Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction.

The impact of marital status on the prognosis of patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogatric junction (AEG) remained unclear. This study aimed to investigate the associations of marital status with cancer-specific death risk and cardiovascular death risk in Siewert type II AEG patients. Data for Siewert type II AEG patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2015. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce inter-group bias between the married and unmarried groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis, a competing risk model and the Fine-Gray multivariable regression model were used to identify the prognostic value of marital status. In total, 1,623 subjects were included. After PSM, according to Fine-Gray multivariable regression analysis, there was no significant difference in the cumulative cancer-specific death rate between the married and the unmarried groups (hazard ratio (HR): 1.160, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.994 - 1.354, P = 0.060). Patients in unmarried group had a higher cardiovascular death rate than patients in married group (HR: 3.066, 95% CI: 1.372 - 6.850, P = 0.006). Our study demonstrates that unmarried Siewert type II AEG patients are associated with higher cardiovascular death risk but not cancer-specific death risk compared with married patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients.

Elderly patients with pathological stage II/III gastric cancer struggle to complete adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for treating locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has drawn attention; however, its indication for elderly patients who are vulnerable to chemotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of NAC for elderly patients with gastric cancer. In this study, patients aged ≥75 years who underwent curative gastrectomy for LAGC or adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction between April 2013 and November 2021 were included. Vulnerable patients, with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 2-3 were also included. The patients were classified into NAC+ (n=20) and NAC - (n=45) groups. The clinicopathological data of the patients were retrospectively investigated. The NAC+ group showed a higher R0 resection rate than the NAC- group (100% vs. 89.1%, p=0.3) and pathological downstaging was achieved in 12 (60%) cases, including five (25%) pathological complete responses. The incidence of adverse events during postoperative chemotherapy was 35%, and the rate of postoperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo Grade II was comparable between the two groups (35% vs. 46.7%, p=0.43). The NAC+ group showed a higher three-year overall survival rate (75% vs. 36%, p=0.015). NAC was feasible and effective for elderly patients including vulnerable patients with LAGC or adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. It can be considered as treatment option, with a high down staging rate and better survival.

CircRNA0007766 accelerates cancer progression via miR-34c-5p/cyclin D1 axis in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG)

Growing empirical evidence shows that circular RNAs (circRNAs) are implicated in tumor pathogenesis. However, little is known about the mechanism by which circRNAs contribute to the progression of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). We conducted RNA high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatic analyses on 22 AEG tissues and their matching healthy gastric mucosal tissues and found that circRNA0007766 may act as a tumor promoter in AEG pathogenesis. BaseScope® in situ hybridization revealed that circRNA0007766 was strongly upregulated in AEG. We then constructed co-expression and ceRNA networks to elucidate the relationships among specific circRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), and mRNAs. We also demonstrated that circRNA0007766 acted as the sponge of miR-34c-5p, thereby positively regulating cyclin D1. In vivo and in vitro experiments demonstrated the roles of circRNA0007766 in promoting AEG progression and invasion. AEG tissues are characterized by circRNA0007766 upregulation which is correlated with lymph node metastasis and poor survival. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is one of the first to show that the circRNA0007766/miR-34c-5p/cyclin D1 axis is important in AEG progression. Furthermore, the results of this work imply that circRNA0007766 is potentially a novel AEG biomarker.

Effect of two surgical approaches on the lung function and prognosis of patients with combined esophagogastric cancer.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction has a center of origin within 5 cm of the esophagogastric junction. Surgical resection remains the main treatment. A transthoracic approach is recommended for Siewert I adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and a transabdominal approach is recommended for Siewert III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. However, there is a need to determine the optimal surgical approach for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction to improve lung function and the prognosis of patients. To investigate and compare the surgical effects, postoperative changes in pulmonary function, and prognoses of two approaches to treating combined esophagogastric cancer. One hundred and thirty-eight patients with combined esophagogastric cancer treated by general and thoracic surgeries in our hospital were selected. They were divided into group A comprising 70 patients (transabdominal approach) and group B comprising 68 patients (transthoracic approach) based on the surgical approach. The indexes related to surgical trauma, number of removed lymph nodes, indexes of lung function before and after surgery, survival rate, and survival duration of the two groups were compared 3 years after surgery. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative drainage duration of the patients in group A were shorter than those of the patients in group B, and the volume of blood loss caused by surgery was lower for group A than for group B (P < 0.05). At the one-month postoperative review, the first second, maximum ventilation volume, forceful lung volume, and lung volume values were higher for group A than for group B (P < 0.05). Preoperatively, the QLQ-OES18 scale scores of the patients in group A were higher than those in group B on re-evaluation at 3 mo postoperatively (P < 0.05). The surgical complication rate of the patients in group A was 10.00%, which was lower than that of patients in group B, which was 23.53% (P < 0.05). Transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches are comparable in treating combined esophagogastric cancer; however, the former results in lesser surgical trauma, milder changes in pulmonary function, and fewer complications.