Adefovir Dipivoxil Combination Research Articles

Synergistic Activity of Adefovir Dipivoxil and Venetoclax to Target the Bioenergetic Metabolism of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is an oral prodrug of the nucleotide analogue adefovir that inhibits viral DNA polymerase and is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of hepatitis B virus. Preliminary evidence of the antileukemic activity of ADV was recently reported in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL; Gong, X., et al. Exp Hematol Oncol, 2022). Herein we report on the antileukemic activity of ADV, alone and in combination with venetoclax (VEN), an oral FDA-approved BCL-2 inhibitor for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Firstly, a significant dose-dependent reduction of cell growth and increase in apoptosis were observed in FLT3-ITD+ MV4-11 (IC50: 97nΜ) and Molm-13 (IC50: 0.816μM) cells, and in primary CD34+ blasts from refractory/relapsed (R/R) AML patients (n=5; IC50: 1.285-3.703μM), exposed to serial concentrations of ADV for 48 hours (hrs). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in ADV-treated CD34+ cells from healthy donors (n=5). Combination of ADV and VEN were synergistic (combination index < 1.0) in reducing cell viability of AML cells (i.e., MV-4-11, U937, KG1 and THP-1) and CD34+ blasts from R/R AML patients (n=3). To gain insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the antileukemic activity of ADV alone and in combination with VEN, we performed RNA-Seq on AML CD34+ blasts from R/R AML patients (n=6) treated with vehicle, ADV (5 μΜ), VEN (100 nΜ), or ADV+VEN for 24 hrs. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) highlighted upregulation of p53 pathway and apoptosis signaling, and downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), glycolysis, and MYC target hallmark gene sets in ADV- and ADV+VEN-treated cells compared with vehicle-treated controls. These results were confirmed by western blot analysis showing a dose-dependent reduction in c-MYC, anti-apoptotic proteins (i.e., BCL-2 and MCL-1), and carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1a [CPT1A, a key enzyme for fatty acid oxidation (FAO), a process that feeds into OXPHOS], and an increase in pro-apoptotic proteins (i.e., BAX and BAK) in ADV- and ADV+VEN-treated MV4-11 and primary AML CD34+ cells, compared with vehicle-treated control cells. Seahorse analysis confirmed a significant reduction of OXPHOS [measured by oxygen consumption rate (OCR)], associated with decreased mitochondrial numbers and sizes evaluated by electron microscopy imaging of AML CD34+ blasts treated with ADV or ADV+VEN compared with vehicle-treated controls. To test in vivo the antileukemic activity of ADV+VEN, we treated a cohort of CD45.1 recipient mice transplanted with BM cells from congenic CD45.2 Mll PTD/WT/Flt3 ITD/ITD AML mice with vehicle, ADV (100mg/kg, oral gavage), VEN (100mg/kg, oral gavage), or ADV+VEN (n=10 per group) for 4 weeks. ADV+VEN-treated mice lived longer (median survival: 60 days after treatment completion) than ADV (20 days, p=0.0001), VEN (20 days, p=0.0001), or vehicle (14 days, p=0.0002) -treated controls (Figure 1). We then performed secondary transplants by engrafting 10 6 BM cells from treated donors into CD45.1 recipient mice (n=10 per group). Recipients of BM from ADV+VEN-treated donors survived longer (median survival: 83 days) than recipients of BM from ADV (60.5 days, p<0.01), VEN (45.5 days, p<0.0001), and vehicle (42.5 days, p<0.0001) -treated donors (Figure 2), confirming a decrease in leukemic stem cell (LSC) burden by ADV+VEN. Next, we examined the antileukemic activity of ADV+VEN in human AML models. We first treated a cohort of NSG mice (n=10 per group) transplanted with luciferase-expressing Molm-13 cells. ADV+VEN-treated mice survived longer (median survival: 59.5 days) than ADV (52 days, p=0.04), VEN (40 days, p<0.0001), and vehicle (40.5 days, p<0.0001) -treated mice. We then treated a cohort of NSG mice (n=8 per group) transplanted with FLT3-ITD+ blasts from a patient with R/R AML. ADV+VEN-treated mice survived longer (median: 38.5 days) than ADV (34.5 days, p=0.035), VEN (25 days, p<0.0001), and vehicle (18.5 days, p<0.0001) -treated mice. In summary, ADV has in vivo anti-leukemic activity in AML likely by interfering with the bioenergetic metabolism of leukemic cells and decreasing their apoptotic threshold. The combination of ADV and VEN is seemingly synergistic and prolonged survival of murine and human AML models, providing a rationale of translating this “all oral” regimen to the clinic for treatment of AML patients, especially those requiring low intensity therapy.

Telbivudine and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy improves renal function in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Few studies have addressed the impact of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-based combination therapy on the renal function of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study evaluated the effects of ADV combined with other antiviral nucleotide analogs (NAs) on renal function of patients with CHB, and analyzed the risk factors for more than 20% reduction of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).The data of 164 patients with CHB were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Of the 164 patients, 42 received entecavir (ETV) combined with ADV (ETV + ADV group), 68 lamivudine (LAM) combined with ADV (LAM + ADV group), and 54 telbivudine (LDT) combined with ADV (LDT + ADV group). Serum creatinine (SCr) level, eGFR, and proportion of patients with eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 were observed. Also, the independent risk factors for more than 20% reduction of baseline eGFR were analyzed.After 104-week combination therapy, compared with the baseline level, SCr levels were significantly increased in the ETV + ADV group (67 μmol/L vs 73 μmol/L, P = .012) and LAM + ADV group (68 μmol/L vs 79 μmol/L, P = .008), but it was significantly decreased in the LDT + ADV group (69 μmol/L vs 64 μmol/L, P = .023). Compared with the baseline level, eGFR was significantly decreased in the ETV + ADV group (107.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 96.1 mL/min 1.73/m2, P = .004), and LAM + ADV group (105.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 87.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, P = .000), but it was significantly increased in the LDT + ADV group (104.1 mL/min 1.73/m2 vs 116.2 mL/min/1.73 m2,P = .005). The proportion of patients with normal renal function (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2) was significantly higher in the LDT + ADV group than in the ETV + ADV group (P = .002) and LAM + ADV group (P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that age (P = .035), male (P = .005), baseline eGFR (P < .001), LAM combined with ADV (P < .008), and ETV combined with ADV (P = .03) were independent risk factors for 20% reduction of baseline eGFR.As compared with ETV and ADV combination therapy as well as LAM and ADV combination therapy, LDT and ADV combination therapy can improve eGFR level, so LDT and ADV combination therapy is suitable for the patients with potential renal impairment.

Long-term virological and adherence outcomes to antiviral treatment in a 4-year cohort chronic HBV study.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment adherence has been poorly studied worldwide. We evaluated long-term virological and adherence outcomes to antiviral treatment in CHB patients. A prospective 183 Brazilian CHB patient cohort treated with monotherapy or combination adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, lamivudine and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was studied in a reference tertiary centre. Treatment adherence was evaluated by a validated questionnaire named 'Assessment of Adherence to Antiviral Therapy Questionnaire' (CEAT-HBV) within three yearly periods (2010/2011, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015). CEAT-HBV identified 43% (79/183) patients with non-adherence to antiviral treatment and among them, 67% (53/79) were viral load positive. The main causes associated with non-response to antiviral treatment were drug resistance variants followed by non-adherence, insufficient treatment duration and other causes. Single-dose pharmacokinetics demonstrated 35% (23/65) antiviral non-adherence. 2 years after the first assessment, the CEAT-HBV indicated that 71% (101/143) of subjects adhered to treatment (per-protocol population). However, 21% (40/183) of the patients could not be evaluated and were excluded. The main reasons for exclusion were death (20/183), 11 out 20 deaths due to hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV booklet was used for medical education. The third CEAT-HBV assessment (2014/2015) showed that 83% (112/135) patients were compliant with treatment adherence (per-protocol population). Long-term evaluation showed that adherence rate based on CEAT-HBV continue to increase after 4-years (P<0.001). The results highlight the importance of CHB therapy adherence assessment monitoring. Long-term adherence outcomes were dynamic and it is possible to increase the migration rate to adherence/HBV-DNA-negative group.

Efficacy and safety of Entecavir monotherapy switched from Lamivudine combined Adefovir Dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B virus-related compensated liver cirrhosis

Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of de novo combination of Lamivudine(LAM) and Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) therapy counter to Entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)- related compensated liver cirrhosis. Methods: Patients with chronic hepatitis B-related compensated cirrhosis who were initially treated with LAM and ADV for more than 1 year were randomly assigned to two groups, one half replaced with ETV monotherapy, and the other half continued LAM and ADV co-therapy. Liver biochemistry, renal biochemistry, estimated glomerular filtration rate, alpha-fetoprotein, HBV serology markers and serum HBV DNA were measured every 3 months. Urine β2-microglobulin was measured every 6 months And retinol binding protein, followed up for 3 years. The mean values of the two groups were compared with t-test, and the rate of comparison was analyzed by x2 test. Results: A total of 580 cases were collected, 290 cases were replaced with ETV monotherapy, the other 290 patients continued to LAM and ADV combination therapy. In the ETV group, the rates of HBV DNA negative conversion at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were 77.6%, 84.5% and 94.5% respectively, while the HBV DNA negative conversion rates at 1, 2 and 3 years in the LAM and ADV combination groups were 69.3%, 73.4% and 80.3% respectively. Among them, the negative rates of HBV DNA in the second year and the third year were P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. The 3-year cumulative gene-resistant rate in the ETV group was 1.4%, while the combined treatment was as high as 8.6%, and the difference was statistically significant in the two groups. The estimated value of serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate in ETV group was followed by 3 years, and the baseline level was maintained, in the same group, the serum creatinine was higher than baseline, and the estimated value of glomerular filtration rate decreased. The results showed that there were 6.2%, 12.1%, 22.1% and 0, 0.3%, 1%, respectively, in 1, 2 and 3 years for the group of consecutive treatment and the replacement of ETV Group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by more than 30% compared with the baseline. The difference was statistically significant; the proportion of serum creatinine in the 1 year, 2 years and 3 years of the combined treatment group was 1.7%, 4.5% and 6.6%, compared with the baseline rise of > 50 μmol/l, and the ETV group was replaced in the 1 year, The values of 2 and 3 years were 0,0,0.7%, of which the 2nd and 3rd years were statistically significant; the proportion of microalbuminuria and retinol-binding protein in patients with combined treatment group was also significantly higher than that of Β2-m ETV Group. Conclusion: The initial combination of LAM and ADV therapy is inferior in terms of ETV monotherapy. Single therapy with ETV increase the rate of viral response, reduce the incidence of drug resistance, and also reduce the incidence of renal impairment in patients with chronic hepatitis B -related compensated liver cirrhosis.

The nucleotide changes within HBV core promoter/precore during the first 12 weeks of nucleos(t)ide treatment might be associated with a better virological response

ObjectivesWe aimed to study the dynamic changes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) core promoter/precore (CP/preC) sequences during antiviral treatment and their associations with virological responses. Materials and methodsThe baseline and 12-week CP/preC sequences (nts 1655–2014) were obtained from 52 chronic hepatitis B patients with positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), who received a 104-week lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy. The mutations within the CP/preC were analyzed against genotype specific reference sequences. The nucleotide change rates in individuals during therapy were analyzed in a pairwise comparison manner. ResultsThere was no significant difference of the mutation rate at each nucleotide site between baseline and week 12 of treatment (P>0.05). The mutation rates of A1762T/G1764A and G1896A were found to decrease from 46.2% (24/52) at baseline to 36.5% (19/52) at week 12 (P=0.426) and from 28.8% (15/52) to 21.2% (11/52) (P=0.497), respectively. The nucleotide change rates varied from 0.0% - 7.8% in individuals [0.0% in Group 1 (N=26); 0.3% - 7.8% in Group 2 (N=26)] during the first 12-week treatment. HBV DNA levels in Group 2 were significantly lower than those in Group 1 throughout therapy (P<0.01) (e.g., 1.5±1.3log10 IU/ml vs. 2.6±1.0log10 IU/ml at week 104, P=0.001). At week 104 the rates of HBV DNA undetectable and HBeAg loss in Group 2 were significantly higher than those in Group 1 (P<0.05). Along with the increased nucleotide change rates, the rate of HBV DNA undetectable at week 104 tended to increase (odds ratio=0.323, 95% confidence interval=0.138–0.758, P<0.001). ConclusionOur findings suggested that the nucleotide changes within HBV CP/preC region during the first 12-week treatment might be associated with a better virological response.

Efficacy of long-term tenofovir-based rescue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B refractory to nucleoside/nucleotide analogs.

Few studies have investigated the efficacy of long-term tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based rescue therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B refractory to nucleoside/nucleotide analogs. We retrospectively analyzed 40 Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B refractory to nucleoside/nucleotide analogs who received TDF-based rescue therapy [TDF monotherapy, TDF plus lamivudine (LAM) combination therapy, or TDF plus entecavir (ETV) combination therapy] followed up for a median of 45 months (range 14-99months). Viral response, changes in hepatitis B surface antigen levels from the baseline, and viral breakthrough during therapy were analyzed. The proportion of patients with undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels (less than 2.1 log copies per milliliter) (viral response) during TDF-based rescue therapy was 68, 78, 85, 88, 83, 81, 88, and 100% at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4years respectively. There were no differences in the viral response rate between the TDF plus LAM group and the TDF plus ETV group. The mean reduction from the baseline in hepatitis B surface antigen levels in patients with LAM-resistant HBV was greater than the reductions in patients with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-resistant or ETV-resistant HBV at 2 and 3years (P=0.024, and P=0.025 respectively). However, two patients with ADV- or ETV-resistant HBV at the baseline developed viral breakthrough during TDF-based rescue therapy. Long-term therapy with a TDF-based rescue regimen demonstrated high viral suppression in patients in whom LAM plus ADV combination therapy, ETV plus ADV combination therapy, or ETV monotherapy had failed. However, patients with ADV- or ETV-resistant HBV at the baseline may develop viral breakthrough and resistance, and careful follow-up is advised.

De novo entecavir+adefovir dipivoxil+lamivudine triple-resistance mutations resulting from sequential therapy with adefovir dipivoxil, and lamivudine.

BackgroundEntecavir-resistance mutations are commonly induced by entecavir treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients. However, entecavir+adefovir dipivoxil+lamivudine triple-resistance mutations induced by sequential or combination treatment with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil have never been reported.ResultsWe retrospectively reviewed 1200 patients who had been tested for anti-HBV drug resistance at Beijing Ditan Hospital of Capital Medical University, and five patients showing multidrug resistance to lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil were enrolled. Stored serum samples were used for genetic analysis, which yielded a total of 135 clones. Entecavir+adefovir dipivoxil+lamivudine triple-resistance mutations were identified in 60 % (3/5) entecavir-naïve patients who received sequential therapy with adefovir dipivoxil and lamivudine. Specifically, we found one rtM204I+rtL180 M+rtM250 V+rtA181 V clone among 23 clones from patient 1 (4.35 %), one rtM204 V+vrtL180 M +rtM250 V+rtA181 V clone among 24 clones from patient 2 (4.17 %), and 2 clones harboring rtM204 V+rtL180 M+rtM250 V+rtA181 V and rtM204 V+rtL180 M+rtI169 V+rtA181 V among 20 clones from patient 3 (10.0 %). The other 2 patients showed multidrug resistance after lamivudine/telbivudine and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy, but no entecavir-resistance mutations were found in these two patients.ConclusionDe novo entecavir+adefovir dipivoxil+lamivudine triple-resistance mutations can be induced by sequential therapy with adefovir dipivoxil and lamivudine in patients who never take entecavir. These results provide important information for sequential therapy with adefovir dipivoxil and lamivudine and the use of entecavir as a rescue therapy for these patients with multidrug resistance.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12941-016-0138-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Evolution of entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus during entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy.

The emergence of entecavir (ETV) resistance is rare, particularly in a longitudinal study. The aim of the present study was to characterize the evolution of ETV-resistant variants during antiviral therapy using entecavir monotherapy followed by ETV-adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy. The study included a prospective cohort of 53 consecutive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. During the 60-month period of ETV therapy, 2 patients exhibited ETV resistance and their medical records were comprehensively reviewed. A total of 25 consecutive serum samples were regularly collected from the 2 patients. All the samples were used to characterize the evolution of the polymerase gene mutations using pyrosequencing. The linkage of the variants was analyzed from 87 reverse transcriptase sequences of 3 selective samples using clone sequencing. The 2 patients presented with viral breakthrough during ETV monotherapy. In patient A, the rtL180M, rtS202G and rtM204V mutant variants were detected using pyrosequencing prior to virological breakthrough. Although the viral load declined following the administration of ADV, the ETV-resistant variants were persistently dominant in the viral populations. In patient B, the rtL180M, rtM204I and rtM204V mutants were present in ~70, 30 and 10% of the viral populations, respectively, at the time of study entry. In addition, rtT184F was present in ~20% of the viral population during virological breakthrough, at month 24. The rtL180M, rtT184F and rtM204V were predominant during the combination treatment. Clonal analysis further revealed that the rtS202G or rtT184F was in all cases co-localized with rtL180M and rtM204V in any single virus isolate clone. The results of the present study indicate that the addition of ADV therapy with ETV for treating ETV-resistant mutation may not inhibit the replication of ETV-resistant variants that developed previously in lamivudine-treated CHB patients.

Naturally occurring deletion/insertion mutations within HBV whole genome sequences in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients are correlated with baseline serum HBsAg and HBeAg levels and might predict a shorter interval to HBeAg loss and seroconversion during antiviral treatment

ObjectivesDeletion/insertion (Del/Ins) throughout hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome has not been well studied for HBeA-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. This study aimed to characterize the HBV Del/Ins mutations in full-length genome quasispecies sequences in such patients at antiviral baseline and to reveal their potential impacts on HBV serological markers and responses to nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) treatment. Materials and methodsA total of 30 HBeAg-positive CHB patients with genotype C infection receiving a 104-week lamivudine (LMV) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy were enrolled. HBV whole genome sequences in serum samples at baseline were clone sequenced and analyzed using bioinformatics tools. ResultsAmong 306 unspliced clone sequences, 61.8% (189/306) had Del/Ins mutations, 38.2% (117/306) were full-length genomes without any Del/Ins. Due to different combinations of 125 deletion types and 45 insertion types, we identified 55 Del/Ins-harboring HBV genome patterns, which affected a single or several functional genomic regions. Importantly, the proportion of Del/Ins-harboring clones was found to be significantly negatively correlated with HBsAg (r=−0.3985, P=0.0292) and HBeAg (r=−0.3878, P=0.0342) at baseline. Higher percentage of Del/Ins-harboring clones at baseline was found to predict a shorter interval to HBeAg loss and seroconversion. ConclusionDel/Ins mutations within HBV whole genome were prevalent in HBeAg-positive CHB patients prior to antiviral treatment. A higher detection rate of these mutations at baseline might correlate with a better response to LMV and ADV combination therapy.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatments based on antiretrovirals for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

To evaluate long-term cost-effectiveness of nucleoside analogues and peg-interferon alfa-2a (peg-IFNa2a) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients. A multi-health slate Markov model was developed based on the disease progression pattern to estimate the long-term effect and medical expense of different treatments for HBeAg-negative CHB.Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was then carried out. In comparison with no antiretroviral treatment, all of the antiretroviral treatments were capable of prolonging CHB patients' life years.In particular, entecavir plus adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy showed the best 2 year survival, with expected life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) being 19.59 years and 10.12 years, respectively, which were 1.46 years and 1.12 years better than with no antiretroviral treatment. The most cost-effective treatment for HBeAg-negative CHB was lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil rescue therapy, as it prolonged survival by 0.95 QALYs with an additional 15459 yuan; the incremental medical cost for gaining 1 QALY was 16273 yuan. Among the antiretroviral medicines applied as therapy for HBeAg-negative CHB in China, the most effective treatment is entecavir plus adefovir dipivoxil rescue therapy and the most cost-effective treatment is lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil rescue therapy.

Efficiency and safety of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy for ninety-six weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis B associated compensated liver cirrhosis

Objective To evaluate the efficiency and safety of lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) associated compensated liver cirrhosis.Methods From June 2007 to February 2009,patients vith CHB associated compensated liver cirrhosis of eight hospitals were enrolled.According to random code table,these patients were divided into initial LAM group and initial ADV group in 1:1 ratio.Patients of the two groups received ADV or LAM monotherapy initially.At week 24 or week 36 of treatment,if the serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level of patients exceeded 3.30 lglU/mL or virological breakthrough (VBT) occurred,the other medicine was added for combination therapy.At week 48,the treatment of all the patients was changed to two medicine combination therapy till week 96.During follow-up period,the occurrences of complications of liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma,virological and biochemical responses,VBT,HBV drug resistance gene mutations and adverse reactions were observed.Fisher' s exact test was performed for statistical analyses.Results Among the 206 patients and in 96 weeks' follow-up,a total of 17 cases developed complications of liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma and in which eight cases were hepatocellular carcinoma (3.88％).At week 96 of treatment,HBV DNA negative convertion rate of initial ADV group was 80.9％ (76/94) and that of initial LAM group was 70.5％ (67/95).The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levd normalization rate of initial ADV group was 95.7 ％ (90/94) and that of initial LAM group was 87.4％ (83/95).Compared with the baseline,the serum albumin level increased 2.5 and 3.3 g/L,respectively,and the prothrombin time shortened 0.6 and 0.7 seconds,respectively.The accumulated VBT rate of initial ADV group was 7.84％ (8/102) and that of initial LAM group was 23.08％ (24/104),the difference was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test,P=0.003).Among 14cases without virus negative convertion at week 96 of treatment,11 cases developed VBT during treatment and in which seven cases were with gene mutations and the other four cases were wild strains.During treatment,adverse reactions included abdominal discomfort,elevated fasting blood glucose,high blood pressure and dizziness,which improved after symptomatic treatments.Conclusion Both ADV and LAM initiated combination therapy can prevent the occurrences of complications of liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with CHB associated compensated liver cirrhosis,and furthermore,it obtains sustained virological response and biochemical function improvement,with slight adverse reaction. Key words: Hepatitis B, chronic; Liver cirrhosis; Adefovir dipivoxil; Lamivudine; Combination therapy

Safety and immunogenicity of therapeutic DNA vaccine with antiviral drug in chronic HBV patients and its immunogenicity in mice

Here, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA vaccine, HB-110, in mice and Korean patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) undergoing adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) treatment. For animal study, mice (BALB/c or HBV transgenic) were immunized with mHB-110, and T-cell and antibody responses were evaluated. For clinical study, 27 patients randomly received either ADV alone or ADV in combination with HB-110. Liver function tests, serum HBV DNA levels and the presence of HBeAg/anti-HBe were analysed. T-cell responses were estimated by ELISPOT and FACS analysis. mHB-110 induced higher T-cell and antibody responses than mHB-100 in mice. No adverse effects were observed by HB-110 cotreated with ADV. HBV-specific T-cell responses were induced in a portion of patients in medium to high dose of HB-110. Interestingly, HB-110 exhibited positive effects on ALT normalization and maintenance of HBeAg seroconversion. One patient, who received high dose of HB-110 exhibited HBeAg seroconversion during vaccination, which correlated with vaccine-induced T-cell responses without ALT elevation. HB-110 was safe and tolerable in CHB patients. In contrast to results in animal models, HB-110 in Korean patients exhibited weaker capability of inducing HBV-specific T-cell responses and HBeAg seroconversion than HB-100 in Caucasian patients. As Asian patients, who are generally infected via vertical transmission, appeared to have higher level of immune tolerance than Caucasian, novel approaches for breaking immune tolerance rather than enhancing immunogenicity may be more urgently demanded to develop effective therapeutic HBV DNA vaccines.

Efficacy and resistance in de novo combination lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil therapy versus entecavir monotherapy for the treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis

BackgroundCurrently, there is no consensus on the efficacy and resistance of de novo combination therapy versus monotherapy for treatment naive patients of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and resistance of de novo combination of lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) compared with entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide–naive patients with CHB.Study designPublications on the effectiveness and resistance of LAM plus ADV versus ETV monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with CHB were identified by a search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of science, OVID, and CBM (Chinese Biological Medical Literature) until May 1, 2013. Biochemical response, hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, and viroligic response were extracted and combined to obtain an integrated result. Viral resistance and safety were reviewed.ResultsFive eligible studies (328 patients in total) were included in the analysis. LAM plus ADV combination therapy produced more rapid HBV DNA reduction rate at 12 weeks than that of ETV monotherapy. At 48 weeks, the combination group had superior viroligic response rates compared with ETV group (90.0% vs. 78.9%, P=0.01). The difference in the ALT normalization and HBeAg seroconversion rates was not found. At week 96, LAM + ADV was more effective than ETV in ALT normalization [RR = 1. 11, 95% CI (1.02, 1.21), P =0.01] and HBeAg seroconversion [RR = 2.00, 95% CI (1.26, 3.18, P=0.003)], and no significant difference was found in the virologic response (P =0.23). No viral resistance occurred in combination therapy and six patients in ETV group were experienced with viral breakthrough. Both groups were well tolerated.ConclusionThe de novo LAM plus ADV combination therapy for treatment-naïve patients with CHB was greater than ETV monotherapy in both biochemical response and HBeAg seroconversion rate up to 96 weeks. The rate of emergence of viral resistance in the combination group was less than that in the ETV monotherapy.

Curative effect of combined lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, and stem cell transplantation on decompensated hepatitis B cirrhosis

This study assessed the clinical efficacy of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil combined with autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation as treatment for patients with hepatitis B and decompensated liver cirrhosis. In total, 77 patients with hepatitis B and decompensated liver cirrhosis were randomly divided into two groups. Under general symptomatic and supportive treatment, the patients in group A (37 cases) were treated with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, whereas those in group B (40 cases) were treated with autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation in combination with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil. After 4 weeks of treatment, the liver function indicators and clinical signs and symptoms of the patients in group B improved more significantly than those of patients in group A. Lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil in combination with autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation effectively prevented hepatitis B virus infection and bone marrow stem cell damage. This combination treatment facilitates the differentiation of bone marrow stem cells into normal liver cells to restore liver structure and improve liver function, thereby improving the quality of life of patients.

Long-term efficacy and emergence of multidrug resistance in patients with lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B treated by combination therapy with adefovir plus lamivudine

Few studies have investigated the emergence of multidrug resistance to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) plus lamivudine (LAM) combination therapy for patients with LAM-refractory chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In this retrospective study, we investigated the long-term clinical course of these patients with or without multidrug resistance mutations. We analyzed 406 Japanese patients with LAM-refractory CHB treated with combination therapy with follow-up for a median of 5.4 (0.5-9.5) years. Multidrug resistance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA was analyzed using direct sequencing or cloning methods at baseline and viral breakthrough or insufficient decline during combination therapy. Ratio of patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA levels (<2.6 log copies/mL) during combination therapy was 63, 72, 75, 79, 82, 80 and 85 % at years 1 through 7, respectively. Substitutions associated with multidrug resistance were identified in 11 patients (2.7 %) at baseline, and in 12 patients (3 %) during therapy. HBV DNA levels of patients with rtA181S mutation at baseline and emergence of rtA181T + rtN236T double mutation or a wide variety of mutations during combination therapy could not be suppressed. Moreover, using ultra-deep sequencing, rtA181T/V mutations were detected at baseline in 7 of 10 patients with emergent multidrug resistance during combination therapy, although 6 of these 7 patients had very low frequency (<1 %) variants. Long-term ADV plus LAM combination therapy is effective in LAM-refractory patients. However, HBV DNA levels of the patients with multidrug resistance at baseline or during combination therapy sometimes could not achieve complete suppression or were re-elevated after a decrease.

Efficacy and safety of telbivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil combination therapy and entecavir monotherapy for HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients with resistance to adefovir dipivoxil

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two rescue strategies for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with resistance to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). This prospective study included 58 HBeAg-positive CHB patients with resistance to ADV; 30 patients underwent telbivudine (LdT) plus ADV combination therapy and 28 patients switched to entecavir (ETV) monotherapy. After 48weeks of treatment, the rates of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <3 log10 copies/mL in the LdT plus ADV group and the ETV group were not significantly different (73.3% vs 57.1%, P=0.195). Six patients receiving LdT plus ADV had HBeAg seroconversion, while none of the patients receiving ETV alone had HBeAg seroconversion (20% vs 0%, P=0.039). During the 48-week treatment period, two patients in the ETV monotherapy group had viral breakthrough and the strains were confirmed to be of a variant associated with ETV resistance (rtM204V+ rtL180M+ rtT184G), while one patient receiving LdT plus ADV had viral breakthrough and an LdT-associated resistance mutation (rtM204I) was detected. For the majority of the patients, both LdT plus ADV combination treatment or ETV monotherapy were generally well tolerated, and no serious side effects were observed. Both LdT plus ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy led to significant decreases in serum HBV DNA in HBeAg-positive CHB patients with resistance to ADV, and LdT plus ADV combination therapy exhibited a significantly higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion compared with ETV monotherapy.

Clinical efficacy of various antiviral-based strategies to treat chronic hepatitis patients with positivity for hepatitis B e antigen and rtN236T mutation

To compare the efficacy and safety of the common antivirals, including adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), pegylated-interferon alpha-2a (peg-IFN) and lamivudine (LAM), used as combination therapies to treat chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with positivity for the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) harboring the ADV-resistance mutation, rtN236T, and to explore the factors associated with curative outcome. Sixty-five adult CHB patients (age range: 20-60 years) who were unresponsive to ADV therapy (HBeAg-positive; HBV DNA >or= 10(5) copies/ml), LAM-naive, and tested positive for the rtN236T HBV mutation were enrolled in the study and randomly divided into two treatment groups: Group A (n = 33), who were administered ADV (10 mg/day, orally) plus peg-IFN (180 microg/week, subcutaneous injection) for 48 weeks; and Group B (n = 32 patients), who received the ADV plus LAM (100 mg/day, orally) for 48 weeks followed by continued LAM treatment for an additional 24 weeks. Pre- (baseline), during and post-treatment measurements of HBV viral loads and hepatitis B markers were made by quantitative PCR and electrochemiluminescence assays, respectively. All patients underwent liver biopsies to determine the histological activity index (HAI) and treatment response regarding inflammation and fibrosis stage. The rates of virological response (VR), HBeAg-negativity, HBeAg seroconversion, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization were calculated, and the significance of differences between groups were assessed by Student's t-test and Chi2 test. There were no significant differences between the two groups in regards to sex, age, or baseline levels of HBV DNA, ALT, and total bilirubin (P > 0.05). At weeks 24 and 48 of treatment and 24 after treatment end, group A showed significantly higher (vs. group B, P < 0.05) rates of reduced HBV DNA viral loads (81.8%, 90.9%, and 75.8% vs. 53.1%, 56.2%, and 59.4%), VR (48.5%, 60.6%, and 42.4% vs. 31.3%, 34.4%, and 31.3%), HBeAg-negativity (39.4%, 60.6%, and 54.5% vs. 12.5%, 37.5%, and 37.5%), HBeAg seroconversion (27.3%, 54.5%, and 48.5% vs. 6.3%, 15.6%, and 18.8%), and ALT normalization (72.7%, 84.8%, and 78.8% vs. 46.9%, 56.3%, and 46.9%). After 48 weeks of treatment, group A showed significantly improved HAI (vs. group B, P < 0.05). With the exception of treatment-related increased creatinine (P < 0.05), group A showed significantly higher rates of adverse reactions; although, none was serious enough to threaten patient safety or necessitate early termination of the treatment regimen. Twenty-four weeks after treatment completion, five patients had HBV viral loads of >or= 2log10 copies/ml and four had < or= 500 copies/ml, and ALT was normalized in 28 patients. The four patients in group A with HBV DNA < or= 500 copies/ml and elevated ALT during treatment did not show HBeAg seroconversion. Peg-IFN plus ADV combination therapy produced better outcomes than the ADV plus LAM combination therapy in regards to HBV viral loads, VR rate, HBeAg-negative rate, HBeAg seroconversion rate, ALT normalization rate, and HAI, but was associated with a higher rate of adverse reactions (none of which were severe). Lack of HBeAg seroconversion was associated with higher virus load and ALT levels.

Combination of lamivudine and adefovir without hepatitis B immune globulin is safe and effective prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive liver transplant candidates

Without effective prophylaxis, liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease is frequently complicated by severe and rapidly progressive HBV recurrence. Combination prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine (LAM) reduces long-term recurrence rates below 10%; however, HBIG is costly and inconvenient to administer. We, therefore, conducted a multicenter, prospective study of outcomes with an HBIG-sparing regimen of LAM plus adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) initiated at the time of listing for liver transplantation and continued after transplantation. Twenty-six patients were recruited into this study at the time of listing for transplantation, and 20 subsequently underwent transplantation. Twelve of the 26 patients had LAM exposure before the study baseline, but none had LAM resistance. The median HBV viral load before the institution of antiviral therapy was approximately 4.0 log(10) IU/mL (range=2.3-7.5 log(10) IU/mL). To the 20 patients who underwent transplantation, 800 IU of intramuscular HBIG was given immediately after transplantation and daily for 7 days only (total HBIG dose=6400 IU). All transplant patients remained alive without HBV recurrence (they were negative for hepatitis B surface antigen, and HBV DNA was undetectable) after a median follow-up of 57 months after transplantation (range=27-83 months). The median serum creatinine level in these patients rose from 81 to 119 μmol/L over the course of the study. No patient required dose reduction or cessation. After the completion of this prospective study, the regimen was modified so that no perioperative HBIG was administered if the pretransplant serum HBV DNA level was suppressed below 3 log(10) IU/mL. Another 28 patients with HBV-related liver disease underwent transplantation (18 without HBIG). All remained alive and well without HBV recurrence after a median follow-up of 22 months after transplantation (range=10-58 months). In conclusion, a combination of LAM and ADV initiated at the time of wait listing provides safe and effective protection against recurrent HBV infection without the high costs and inconvenience associated with long-term HBIG therapy.

Antiviral efficacies of currently available rescue therapies for multidrug-resistant chronic hepatitis B

Background/AimsThe incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during sequential lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) treatment is increasing. We investigated the antiviral efficacies of various rescue regimens in patients who failed sequential LAM-ADV treatment.MethodsForty-eight patients (83.3% of whom were HBeAg-positive) who failed sequential LAM-ADV treatment were treated with one of the following regimens: entecavir (ETV) (1 mg) monotherapy (n=16), LAM+ADV combination therapy (n=20), or ETV (1 mg)+ADV combination therapy (n=12). All patients had confirmed genotypic resistance to both LAM and ADV and were evaluated every 12 weeks.ResultsThe baseline characteristics and treatment duration did not differ significantly among the study groups. During the treatment period (median duration: 100 weeks), the decline of serum HBV DNA from baseline tended to be greatest in the ETV+ADV group at all-time points (week 48: -2.55 log10 IU/mL, week 96: -4.27 log10 IU/mL), but the difference was not statistically significant. The ETV+ADV group also tended to have higher virologic response rates at 96 weeks compared to the ETV monotherapy or LAM+ADV groups (40.0% vs. 20.0% or 20.0%, P=0.656), and less virologic breakthrough was observed compared to the ETV monotherapy or LAM+ADV groups (8.3% vs. 37.5% or 30.0%; P=0.219), but again, the differences were not statistically significant. HBeAg loss occurred in one patient in the ETV+ADV group, in two in the ETV monotherapy group, and in none of the LAM+ADV group. The safety profiles were similar in each arm.ConclusionsThere was a nonsignificant tendency toward better antiviral efficacy with ETV+ADV combination therapy compared to LAM+ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy for MDR CHB in Korea, where tenofovir is not yet available.

De novocombined lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil therapyvsentecavir monotherapy for hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis

To compare efficacy of combined lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) therapy with that of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related decompensated liver cirrhosis. A total of 120 naïve patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis participated in this study. Sixty patients were treated with combined LAM and ADV therapy (LAM + ADV group), while the other 60 were treated with ETV monotherapy (ETV group) for two years. Tests for liver and kidney function, alpha-fetoprotein, HBV serum markers, HBV DNA load, prothrombin time (PT), and ultrasonography or computed tomography scan of the liver were performed every 1 to 3 mo. Repeated measure ANOVA and the χ(2) test were performed to compare the efficacy, side effects, and the cumulative survival rates at 48 and 96 wk. Forty-five patients in each group were observed for 96 wk. No significant differences in HBV DNA negative rates and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization rates at weeks 48 (χ(2) = 2.12 and 2.88) and 96 (χ(2) = 3.21 and 3.24) between the two groups were observed. Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rate in the LAM + ADV group at week 96 was significantly higher in the ETV group (43.5% vs 36.4%, χ(2) = 4.09, P < 0.05). Viral breakthrough occurred in 2 cases (4.4%) by week 48 and in 3 cases (6.7%) by week 96 in the LAM + ADV group, and no viral mutation was detected. In the ETV group, viral breakthrough occurred in 1 case (2.2%) at the end of week 96. An increase in albumin (F = 18.9 and 17.3), decrease in total bilirubin and in ALT (F = 16.5, 17.1 and 23.7, 24.8), reduced PT (F = 22.7 and 24.5), and improved Child-Turcotte-Pugh and the model for end-stage liver disease scores (F = 18.5, 17.8, and 24.2, 23.8) were observed in both groups. The cumulative rates of mortality and liver transplantation were 16.7% (10/60) and 18.3% (11/60) in the LAM + ADV and ETV groups, respectively. Both LAM + ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy can effectively inhibit HBV replication, improve liver function, and decrease mortality.