Address Health Care Disparities Research Articles

Effectiveness and equity of mHealth apps for preeclampsia management in LMICs: A rapid review protocol.

Preeclampsia remains a formidable public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where it significantly contributes to the high rates of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The advent of mobile health (mHealth) applications presents a promising avenue for enhancing the management of preeclampsia. This review protocol is designed to systematically assess the effectiveness and equity of mHealth apps in managing preeclampsia within LMICs, with a focus on clinical outcomes and the broader implications for accessibility, affordability, and cultural relevance. To achieve the objectives of this review, a rapid review methodology will be employed, encompassing a structured search strategy to identify pertinent studies from databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, as well as grey literature. The inclusion criteria are set to encompass randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), observational studies, and qualitative studies that offer insights into the effectiveness and user experience of mHealth apps for preeclampsia management. Participants in these studies will include pregnant women at risk for or diagnosed with preeclampsia, healthcare providers, and app developers. The quality of the included studies will be critically appraised using standardized tools, and data extraction will focus on study characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and equity considerations. The implications of this review are far-reaching, offering the potential to inform stakeholders including policymakers, healthcare providers, and app developers about the deployment and development of mHealth solutions for preeclampsia management in LMICs. Ultimately, the anticipated findings of this review are expected to contribute significantly to the understanding of mHealth apps' role in improving preeclampsia management and addressing healthcare disparities, thereby guiding future strategies to enhance maternal and neonatal health outcomes in LMICs.

Understanding faculty perspectives on health equity curriculum implementation in graduate medical education: a qualitative study.

Despite increased awareness of persistent healthcare disparities, integrating health equity education into medical residency curricula needs urgent expansion. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates addressing healthcare disparities and social determinants of health, but implementation remains insufficient due to pervasive barriers. To explore residency faculty perspectives at one institution surrounding implementing a health equity curriculum within their programs. Between November 2022 and April 2023, qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted with residency faculty participants (n = 13) from a large academic medical institution. Participants were recruited via an internal email list directory of program directors. Semi-structured sessions explored faculty perspectives on health equity curriculum implementation. Data analysis utilized template analysis and thematic coding. Faculty perceived barriers included limited time for teaching health equity, challenges in prioritizing health equity content within the curriculum, lack of formal training and expertise, discomfort in leading discussions, and institutional barriers such as resource allocation and lack of buy-in. Findings underscored the need for institutionally supported faculty development and protected learning time for health equity education. Despite participant recruitment and representation limitations, the study provides valuable insights for addressing curricular challenges. This study highlights critical areas for improving health equity curriculum implementation in graduate medical education. Addressing these faculty barriers can enhance resident competency in identifying and addressing healthcare disparities. The study received approval from the Thomas Jefferson Institutional Review Board (IRB #22E.762).

Innovative healthcare solutions for resource-limited settings expanding pharmaceutical care to remote populations

Access to essential healthcare and pharmaceutical services remains a significant challenge in resource-limited settings. This paper explores innovative strategies for expanding pharmaceutical care to remote populations, focusing on the integration of mobile health technologies and community-based interventions. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, including telemedicine and mobile pharmacies, offer a cost-effective means of delivering healthcare services, enhancing access, and improving real-time monitoring. Community-based interventions, such as the deployment of community health workers, health education campaigns, and peer support groups, play a critical role in addressing healthcare disparities and improving health literacy and medication adherence. The paper also discusses the integration of pharmaceutical care models, emphasizing the importance of collaboration among healthcare providers, pharmacists, and community health workers. Future directions highlight emerging innovations like AI and blockchain technology, while policy recommendations emphasize the need for investment in healthcare infrastructure, professional training, and regulatory support. By leveraging these strategies and innovations, healthcare outcomes and equity in resource-limited settings can significantly improve.

Closing the Gap: Implementing Gender-Sensitive Care to Address Healthcare Disparities

Abstract Background Women still face a higher mortality rate after a heart attack compared to men, and the reasons remain unknown. The project HeartGap aims to investigate the disparity between evidence-based guidelines and the integration of Gender-Sensitive Care (GSC+) in clinical settings. By exploring healthcare providers’ attitudes and knowledge on GSC+, the project seeks to develop holistic recommendations for its effective implementation. Methods The project HeartGap employs a mixed-methods approach, including a scoping review, qualitative focus group interviews, and quantitative surveys. The focus of this abstract will be on the qualitative survey. From June 13, 2023, to April 26, 2024, a total of 18 focus group interviews were conducted in 9 hospitals of varying sizes and levels of care in Germany. These interviews involved separate groups of 3-8 nurses or physicians to explore attitudes, knowledge including the european guidelines for cardiology and current implementation of GSC+ into clinical practice. Facilitating factors and barriers were also discussed and in which fields measures should be applied. The results were evaluated using a qualitative content analysis. Results The interviews revealed discrepancies in healthcare providers’ awareness of GSC+ and identified both facilitating and hindering factors in its implementation. Facilitating factors included increased awareness, more evidence by considering gsc+ in research, university and professional education, support from hospital leadership and politics. Barriers included a lack of time and knowledge, other priorities and vague content on GSC+ in medical and nursing guidelines. Conclusions Gender-sensitive care is crucial for personalized healthcare, yet its implementation remains inconsistent in clinical practice. Targeted strategies are necessary to enhance awareness, knowledge, and guidelines and policy support for GSC+. The Identified recommendations for action are transferable throughout Europe. Key messages • Gender-sensitive care is pivotal for addressing healthcare disparities but faces implementation challenges. • Comprehensive strategies, including awareness, teaching and policy support, are indispensable for integrating gender-sensitive care into clinical practice.

Mitigating health disparities by improving access to catheter-based therapies for vulnerable patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Abstract Introduction This study explores the implementation and outcomes of catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) within a safety-net hospital (SNH), addressing a critical gap in the literature concerning CBT in underserved and vulnerable populations. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing CBT between October 2020 and January 2024 at a SNH. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Results A total of 107 patients (47.6% female, mean age 58.4 years) underwent CBT for acute PE, with 23 (21.5%) high-risk and 84 (78.9%) intermediate-risk PE. Demographically, 64% identified as Black, 10% White, 19% Hispanic or Latino, and 5% Asian. In terms of insurance coverage, 50% had private insurance or Medicare, 36% had Medicaid, and 14% were uninsured. Notably, 67% of the patients resided in high poverty rate zip codes and 11% were non-citizen non-residents. Markers of risk severity, such as biomarkers (troponin, BNP), PE risk classification (high versus intermediate-risk), rates of low CI, lactate level, CPES/sPESI score, and rates of RV dysfunction did not vary significantly across race/ethnic groups, insurance status, level of poverty and citizenship status. Over a median follow up period of 30 days, 6 (5.6%) patients expired (all high-risk PE), 3 of which presented with cardiac arrest. No patients who presented with intermediate-risk PE died at 30 days. There was no difference in 30-day mortality based on race, insurance type, poverty level or citizenship status. Conclusion The findings emphasize the feasibility and success of implementing PERT and CBT at a SNH, offering a potential model to address healthcare disparities in acute PE on a broader scale.

Conducting Human Biology Research Using Invasive Clinical Samples: Methods, Strengths, and Limitations.

Invasive biological samples collected during clinical care represent a valuable yet underutilized source of information about human biology. However, the challenges of working with clinical personnel and the invasive nature of sample collection in biomedical studies can hinder the acquisition of sufficiently large sample sizes for robust statistical analyses. In addition, the incorporation of demographic data from participants is crucial for ensuring the inclusiveness of representative populations, identifying at-risk groups, and addressing healthcare disparities. Drawing on both research experiences and the existing literature, this article provides recommendations for researchers aiming to undertake efficient and impactful projects involving invasive human samples. The suggested strategies include: (1) establishing productive collaborations with clinicians; (2) optimizing sample quality through meticulous collection and handling procedures; and (3) strategically implementing a retrospective model to capitalize on existing invasive sample repositories. When established, cooperative work between clinical health care workers and biological anthropologists can yield insights into human biology that have the potential to improve human health and wellbeing.

Integrating Gender-Affirming Care in a Medical Spanish Endocrine System Curriculum.

With a growing Hispanic population in the United States, medical education is adapting to provide the necessary language skills and cultural competence for effective health care. However, the incorporation of gender-affirming care in the context of medical education for Hispanic populations requires further emphasis. This curriculum presented a 3-week medical Spanish endocrine system module designed for first-year medical students. The module aimed to enhance students' ability to communicate effectively with Spanish-speaking patients about endocrine health while integrating principles of gender-affirming care. It included classroom sessions, standardized patient practice, and clinical practice with peer tutors. Pre- and postmodule surveys and assessments were conducted to evaluate the module's effectiveness. Out of 76 participants, 72 completed the postmodule evaluation. Survey results indicated significant increases in confidence levels across various aspects of patient interaction in Spanish, with statistically significant gains observed in all assessed areas. Knowledge test outcomes revealed enhanced proficiency in Spanish terminology related to the endocrine system, with scores increasing from an average of 22.3 premodule to 25.7 postmodule (p = .002), as measured by the paired t test. Additionally, students performed well in the diabetic consultation objective structured clinical examination station, with a high mean score of 86%, surpassing the satisfactory threshold. This curriculum highlights the success of a comprehensive educational approach in expanding medical students' language proficiency and ability to provide gender-affirming care to address health care disparities and improve patient outcomes among diverse populations.

Fostering Inclusivity in the Clinical Learning Environment.

Despite the Supreme Court's decision on race-based admissions, academic medical centers, medical societies, and accreditation bodies remain committed to recruiting a diverse workforce. Many medical schools and graduate medical education programs created initiatives to expand their census of underrepresented in medicine (UIM) as the key to addressing health care disparities. As a result, an influx of an UIM physician workforce has entered clinical learning environments, often without consideration of the inclusivity of these settings. To create inclusive, safe, and comfortable CLEs, we must first recognize the challenges faced by UIM trainees, students, and faculty and the complex ways in which discrimination manifests. Ultimately, having inclusive CLEs allows all learners, especially those from historically excluded identities, to thrive in their training and working environment, making it essential to retain the diverse workforce necessary. Using case examples, we discuss strategies of inclusivity and ways in which we can maintain clinical learning environments where learners feel safe and supported through their training.

Advancing Equity in Rare Disease Research: Insights From the Undiagnosed Disease Network.

Rare diseases affect 6%-8% of the population and present diagnostic challenges, particularly for historically marginalized ethnic and racial groups. The Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN) aims to enhance diagnosis rates and research participation among such minoritized groups. Aretrospective review was conducted from 2015 to 2023, analyzing2235 UDN participants to evaluate its progress toward this objective. Data on demographics, disease phenotypes, diagnostic outcomes, and socioeconomic factors were collected and statistical analyses assessed differences among ethnic and racial groups. This demonstrated that Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic groups were underrepresented, while White non-Hispanic participants were overrepresented in the UDN compared to the US population. Individuals whose primary language was not English were also significantly underrepresented. Diagnosis rates varied, with the highest rates among Asian non-Hispanic (39.5%) and Hispanic (35.3%) groups and the lowest rate in the White non-Hispanic group (26.8%) (p < 0.001). Binomial logistic regression found, however, that only participant age and disease phenotype predicted the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis (p < 0.001). Persistent ethnic and racial disparities in UDN participation appear to be associated with major differences in application rates. Under-enrollment of historically marginalized ethnic and racial groups may be due to economic hardships and language barriers. No differences in the diagnostic yield among ethnic and racial groups were observed after controlling for other factors. This work highlights the value of comprehensive genetic evaluations for addressing healthcare disparities and suggests priorities for advancing inclusion in rare disease research.

Exploring Genetic Counselors' Experiences with Indigenous Patient Populations.

This study investigates the preparedness of genetic counselors in addressing the potentially unique elements and considerations of Indigenous patients in the United States and Canada. Considering the healthcare disparities Indigenous populations face, particularly in specialty care, this study aims to assess the preparedness of genetic counselors in addressing the unique needs and cultural considerations of Indigenous patients. An online survey was utilized, and a subset of participants was selected to be interviewed. Results reveal genetic counselors felt less competent with Indigenous patients compared to non-Indigenous patients, especially in specific aspects of genetic counseling such as responding to cultural issues or identifying resources. Factors such as increased years of experience and more exposure to Indigenous populations during graduate training correlated with higher self-rated competency. Despite a patient population that is on average 7% Indigenous by self-report, genetic counselors lacked exposure to Indigenous encounters in graduate programs and professional training. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing genetic counseling education and exposure to Indigenous training opportunities such as voluntary events or Indigenous guest speakers to improve cultural competency and address healthcare disparities for Indigenous communities.

7706 Racial Disparities in Thyroid-Related Procedure Reoperation Rates: Insights from NSQIP Database

Abstract Disclosure: H.A. Erol: None. A. Liu: None. K. Wardwell: None. S. Woodruff: None. Background: Racial disparities in health outcomes are well-documented, with specific conditions affecting racial groups differently. However, the influence of race on endocrine surgery outcomes remains an evolving field of study. This research seeks to evaluate the effect of race on unplanned reoperations using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program(NSQIP)-database and to investigate additional risk factors for reoperations in this cohort. Methods: We analyzed the NSQIP-database for thyroid-related procedures from 2012-2021 using CPT codes. Patient demographics, including age, sex, height/weight, ASA classification, and comorbid conditions, were assessed for unplanned reoperations. Univariate, multivariable logistic regression, and adjusted residual analyses were conducted assessing individual variables, adjusted odds ratios(ORs), and for post-hoc analyses. Results: Over the 10-year period, 169,251 patients were identified, with an overall reoperation incidence of 1.32%. Univariate analysis revealed that race correlated with increased reoperation rates, with the highest incidence observed among American Indian/Alaska Native (2.13%) patients, followed by Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (1.93%), Black/African American(1.84%), White (1.22%), and Asian(1.08%) patients. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, Black/African American (OR 1.452, 95% CI 1.293-1.630, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and American Indian/Alaska Native (OR 1.775, 95% CI 1.039-3.031, p = 0.036) patients had a higher risk of reoperation compared to White patients. Other factors associated with increased reoperation risk included male gender, higher ASA class, smoking, partially dependent functional status, ventilator dependency, hypertension, dialysis, disseminated cancer, bleeding disorders, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. Most reoperations were hematoma related(63.02%), with statistical significance noted among different ethnicities and types of reoperations. White patients had lower rates of hematoma-related procedures, fewer tracheostomies, and more additional thyroid procedures. Black/African American patients had more tracheostomies and fewer lymphatic-related or additional thyroid procedures. Conclusions: Using the NSQIP-database, Black/African American and American Indian/Alaska Native patients were at a greater risk of reoperation following thyroid surgeries, even after accounting for multiple variables. Black/African American patients also had disparate types of reoperations. These findings highlight the impact of race on thyroidectomy-related outcomes. Further research is imperative to comprehensively understand the role of race in surgical outcomes and to address healthcare disparities and inequities. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Diversifying Skin Tone Representation in Medical School Dermatology Curriculum

AbstractThe lack of diversity in medical education contributes to disparities in dermatologic health outcomes, particularly for patients of color. This study evaluates second-year medical students’ comfort in diagnosing conditions in skin of color (SOC) and explores strategies to improve their confidence. We hypothesize that a curriculum enriched with SOC representation will enhance diagnostic skills. Surveys from Fall 2020 and Fall 2022 showed increased student comfort in diagnosing SOC. Fall 2022 students, exposed to more diverse dermatologic photos, demonstrated greater confidence. These findings underscore the necessity of integrating SOC content into medical curricula to address healthcare disparities.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts in Graduate Medical Education: Identifying Opportunities for Collaborative Learning.

Background Physician-patient racial and cultural concordance is essential to address health care disparities. Yet, limited literature on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) outcomes in graduate medical education (GME) suggests the need for high-yield DEI resources. Objectives To describe and identify DEI efforts by US residency program director (PD) associations and areas for collaboration among the GME community. Methods Through bimonthly teleconferences and 5 iterative revisions from June to September 2022, the DEI workgroup of the US Organization of PD Associations developed a 17-question needs assessment survey to investigate DEI activities across residency PD associations, which was delivered twice electronically from September to November 2022 to 30 specialty PD association representatives. Results Survey response rate was 73% (22 of 30). Specialties track resident demographics more than PD demographics (11 of 22, 50% vs 7 of 22, 32%). Tracked demographics vary and include race, gender, and sexual orientation. Most PD associations have DEI committees (16 of 22, 73%) implementing various initiatives, the most common of which was providing resources to ensure diverse representation (11 of 16, 69%). Most specialties provide residency recruitment resources (14 of 22, 64%) and funding for visiting rotations or mentorship for underrepresented trainees (12 of 22, 54%). Resources for pipeline programs (7 of 22, 32%) and retention of diverse residents (7 of 22, 32%) were less common. Faculty development training focused more on teaching DEI to residents (14 of 22, 64%) than on teaching health disparities (7 of 22, 32%). Conclusions Our study demonstrates substantial DEI interventions among specialty PD associations. Yet, educational gaps exist in specific DEI content, faculty development, and curricular dissemination.

The Use of Telehealth for People With Disabilities: A Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis.

To identify the use of telehealth for people with disabilities in community or primary care settings and to explore effective telehealth interventions for this group. Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. The literature search was conducted in January 2024 using five electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane library and PsycINFO. The review followed the Tawfik's guideline and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines for reporting. Out of 7363 retrieved articles, 1871 duplicates were removed, 5389 were excluded after title and abstract review, and 4 were excluded due to unavailable full text. One additional article was obtained through citation and hand searching. Thirteen studies were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Quantitative data were narratively synthesised. Thirteen quantitative studies were selected including three quasi-experimental studies and ten randomised controlled trials. The types of telehealth included telemonitoring, computerised intervention, virtual reality, telephone care, mHealth tools, decision support tools, digital storytelling and technology-assisted language interventions. The most common type of disability was intellectual disability, and the most common telehealth provider was the digital device itself. Most studies used surveys as the data collection method and the interventions were mostly conducted individually. Computer-based telehealth interventions demonstrated significant improvement in attention, health knowledge and psychological well-being. Telephone, virtual reality and tablet interventions also had positive impacts on body weight, motor coordination and pragmatic language skills. Telemonitoring was also beneficial. This systematic review examined the current state and effectiveness of telehealth interventions for people with disabilities. However, few intervention studies were found, and some studies were of poor quality. Continued interest and efforts from the government and researchers are needed targeting people with disabilities. Results provide valuable insights for healthcare providers, policymakers and researchers. They raise awareness about the potential of telehealth to address healthcare disparities and improve access to care for people with disabilities. No patient or public contribution: Systematic review.

Prenatal Surgery for Open Fetal Spina Bifida in Patients with Obesity: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Background: Obesity rates have significantly increased globally, affecting up to 40% of women of childbearing age in the United States. While prenatal repair of open fetal spina bifida has shown improved outcomes, most fetal surgery centers exclude patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 based on criteria from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial. This exclusion raises concerns about healthcare equity and highlights a significant knowledge gap regarding the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Objective: To review the current state of knowledge regarding open fetal surgery for fetal spina bifida in patients with obesity, focusing on safety, efficacy, and clinical considerations. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed and EMBASE databases, covering articles from the inception of the databases to April 2024. Studies discussing fetal surgery for neural tube defects and documenting BMI measurements and their impact on surgical outcomes, published in peer-reviewed journals, and available in English were included. Quantitative data were extracted into an Excel sheet, and data synthesis was conducted using the R programming language (version 4.3.3). Results: Three retrospective studies examining outcomes of prenatal open spina bifida repair in a total of 43 patients with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 were identified. These studies did not report significant adverse maternal or fetal outcomes compared to patients with lower BMIs. Our pooled analysis revealed a perinatal mortality rate of 6.1% (95% CI: 1.76-18.92%), with 28.0% (95% CI: 14.0-48.2%) experiencing the premature rupture of membranes and 82.0% (95% CI: 29.2-98.0%) delivering preterm (<37 weeks). Membrane separation was reported in 10.3% of cases (95% CI: 3.3-27.7%), the mean gestational age at birth was 34.3 weeks (95% CI: 32.3-36.3), and the average birth weight was 2651.5 g (95% CI: 2473.7-2829.4). Additionally, 40.1% (95% CI: 23.1-60.0%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Conclusion: While current evidence suggests that fetal spina bifida repair may be feasible in patients with obesity, significant limitations in the existing body of research were identified. These include small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. There is an urgent need for large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies to definitively establish the safety and efficacy of fetal spina bifida repair in patients with obesity. Such research is crucial for developing evidence-based guidelines, improving clinical outcomes, and addressing healthcare disparities in this growing patient population with obesity.

Abstract C038: Science of Cancer Survivorship Advocacy: Perspectives from Black Prostate Cancer Survivors

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer remains a significant health concern, particularly among Black men who experience higher incidence rates and poorer outcomes compared to other racial and ethnic groups. Despite advances in survivorship care, disparities persist in the survivorship experiences, underlying the urgent need for research focusing on the unique needs of Black men in prostate cancer survivorship. By understanding the advocacy efforts and experiences of Black men who have completed prostate cancer treatment, we can identify strategies to better support this vulnerable population and inform interventions aimed at improving survivorship outcomes. Our study explored the advocacy efforts, experiences, and skills of Black men post-prostate cancer treatment to inform targeted interventions aimed at improving survivorship outcomes. Methods: Qualitative interviews were used to obtain information from 31 Black prostate cancer survivors who have completed treatment to explore their insights on survivorship and advocacy. Grounded Theory approach was utilized to analyze participants’ narratives. We employed open and axial coding techniques to extract themes from audio-recorded interviews that were then transcribed, verified and deidentified. Results: We identified several significant themes among Black men who completed prostate cancer treatment. First, participants actively engaged in "spreading the word," advocating for awareness and early detection within their communities through various channels. Second, they emphasized "the importance of advocacy," advocating for themselves and policy changes to address healthcare disparities. Third, participants were committed to "sharing information," openly discussing experiences and providing support to others navigating prostate cancer. Additionally, they highlighted the significance of "reflecting back," drawing from their life stories to offer valuable insights and guidance. Conclusion: This study sheds light on the advocacy efforts and experiences of Black men who have completed prostate cancer treatment, offering valuable insights into their perspectives and actions within their communities. Through the identification of five significant themes, including spreading awareness, advocacy importance, information sharing, and reflective support, this research underscores the proactive engagement of participants in addressing the challenges of prostate cancer. By amplifying the voices and experiences of these individuals, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted nature of prostate cancer survivorship within marginalized communities, ultimately informing future interventions and policies aimed at improving outcomes and reducing disparities in prostate cancer survivorship care. Citation Format: Fullwood, Mary Ellen Young, Folakemi T. Odedina. Science of Cancer Survivorship Advocacy: Perspectives from Black Prostate Cancer Survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C038.

Exploring Cesarean Section Delivery Patterns in South India: A Bayesian Multilevel and Geospatial analysis of Population-Based Cross-Sectional Data

BackgroundThis paper focuses on the period from 2019 to 2021 and investigates the factors associated with the high prevalence of C-section deliveries in South India. We also examine the nuanced patterns, socio-demographic associations, and spatial dynamics underlying C-section choices in this region. A cross-sectional study was conducted using large nationally representative survey data.MethodsNational Family Health Survey data (NFHS) from 2019 to 2021 have been used for the analysis. Bayesian Multilevel and Geospatial Analysis have been used as statistical methods.ResultsOur analysis reveals significant regional disparities in C-section utilization, indicating potential gaps in healthcare access and socio-economic influences. Maternal age at childbirth, educational attainment, healthcare facility type size of child at birth and ever pregnancy termination are identified as key determinants of method of C-section decisions. Wealth index and urban residence also play pivotal roles, reflecting financial considerations and access to healthcare resources. Bayesian multilevel analysis highlights the need for tailored interventions that consider individual household, primary sampling unit (PSU) and district-level factors. Additionally, spatial analysis identifies regions with varying C-section rates, allowing policymakers to develop targeted strategies to optimize maternal and neonatal health outcomes and address healthcare disparities. Spatial autocorrelation and hotspot analysis further elucidate localized influences and clustering patterns.ConclusionIn conclusion, this research underscores the complexity of C-section choices and calls for evidence-based policies and interventions that promote equitable access to quality maternal care in South India. Stakeholders must recognize the multifaceted nature of healthcare decisions and work collaboratively to ensure more balanced and effective healthcare practices in the region.

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Healthcare Disparities

Healthcare disparities, particularly in vulnerable areas, are important human rights violations that contribute to poor health outcomes and higher healthcare expenses. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides promising solutions for reducing inequities by improving decision-making, disease diagnosis, and access to care. However, if deployed incorrectly, AI has the potential to perpetuate current imbalances. This study investigates the role of AI in addressing healthcare disparities and presents AI applications for closing these gaps, obstacles, ethical concerns, and future potential for using AI to create a more equitable healthcare system. Combining AI with equitable frameworks can encourage inclusion, improve healthcare outcomes, and minimize long-standing healthcare disparities. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Healthcare Disparities, Health Equity, Marginalized Communities, Health Access.

Telehealth Utilization to Address Health Care Disparities Among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders: A Scoping Review.

Research has reported health care disparities, including low rates of health care utilization, among racial and ethnic minority groups compared to Whites. Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders (AANHPIs) have experienced these disparities, attributed to various barriers such as limited access to linguistically and culturally concordant health care services. Telehealth may offer a viable mode of health service delivery for AANHPIs. The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic sparked the adoption of technology for receiving health services. However, the literature on telehealth utilization before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among AANHPIs is limited. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of telehealth intervention empirical studies serving AANHPIs published between January 2010 and February 2024, using five databases. Twenty-four articles met our inclusion criteria, which required the use of a telehealth intervention program, provision of disaggregated AANHPIs, and targeting of physical and/or mental health outcomes. Our review revealed positive findings of telehealth interventions in helping AANHPIs access health care, with a primary focus on education and consultation for self-management. The review highlighted a range of technological platforms used in AANHPIs telehealth interventions, including web-based, mobile, and blended approaches. Additionally, the review emphasized the need for improved access to technology and reduction in digital exclusion. The findings affirm the usefulness and potential of telehealth interventions, providing implications for how health professionals can serve AANHPIs. Telehealth technology offers the ability for greater accessibility and individualization to address health care disparities in AANHPIs.

Mitigating health disparities by improving access to catheter-based therapies for vulnerable patients with acute pulmonary embolism

IntroductionThis study explores the implementation and outcomes of catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) within a safety-net hospital (SNH), addressing a critical gap in the literature concerning CBT in underserved and vulnerable populations. MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients undergoing CBT between October 2020 and January 2024 at a SNH. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. ResultsA total of 107 patients (47.6 % female, mean age 58.4 years) underwent CBT for acute PE, with 23 (21.5 %) high-risk and 84 (78.5 %) intermediate-risk PE. Demographically, 64 % identified as Black, 10 % White, 19 % Hispanic or Latino, and 5 % Asian. In terms of insurance coverage, 50 % had private insurance or Medicare, 36 % had Medicaid, and 14 % were uninsured. Notably, 67 % of the patients resided in high poverty rate zip codes and 11 % were non-citizen non-residents. Over a median follow up period of 30 days, 6 (5.6 %) patients expired (all high-risk PE), 3 of whom presented with cardiac arrest. No patients who presented with intermediate-risk PE died at 30 days. There was no difference in 30-day mortality based on race, insurance type, poverty level or citizenship status. ConclusionOur study findings reveal no disparities in access or outcomes to CBT at our SNH, emphasizing the feasibility and success of implementing PERT and CBT at a SNH, offering a potential model to address healthcare disparities in acute PE on a broader scale.