Additional Years Of Follow-up Research Articles

Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Asian Patients With Treatment-Naïve Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC: Five-Year Update From the Phase 3 ALESIA Study

IntroductionPrevious results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after more than or equal to 5 years of follow-up from the “last patient in” date. MethodsAdult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n = 125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n = 62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary or exploratory endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, time to CNS progression, and safety. ResultsAt the data cutoff (May 16, 2022), the median survival follow-up was 61 and 51 months in the alectinib and crizotinib arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 41.6 months with alectinib versus 11.1 months with crizotinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.23–0.49). Overall survival data remain immature; 5-year overall survival rates were 66.4% (alectinib arm) versus 56.1% (crizotinib arm). Objective response rate was 91.2% versus 77.4% with alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. CNS progression was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib (cause-specific hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.08–0.32). Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib versus crizotinib (42.3 versus 12.6 mo). No new safety signals were observed. ConclusionsWith four additional years of follow-up, these updated results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety of alectinib in Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, and confirm alectinib as a standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

A phase III randomized trial of radiotherapy optimization for low-risk HER2-positive breast cancer (HERO): NRG-BR008.

TPS613 Background: Breast radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) who undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, the magnitude of benefit of RT is less clear in BCS patients with low-risk disease who receive effective systemic therapy. Among patients with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) BC, 10-year locoregional recurrence has been reported as low as 1.5% following BCS, adjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, and RT. Given these exceedingly favorable outcomes, with the addition of HER2-directed therapy, we seek to evaluate the feasibility of omitting RT among patients with early-stage HER2+ BC following BCS and appropriate systemic therapy. Methods: This is a phase III randomized trial for patients ≥40 years with early-stage, node-negative, HER2+ (IHC/FISH) BC treated with BCS with negative margins and sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection. Patients undergoing primary surgery must have pathologic T1 (≤2 cm) N0 disease, while patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy must have clinical T1-2 (with radiographically T≤3.0 cm) N0 disease and exhibit a pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) at surgery. All patients must receive cytotoxic chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, either in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Stratification is by age (<60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1 cm), estrogen-receptor status (positive; negative), and systemic therapy sequencing (adjuvant vneoadjuvant). Patients will be randomized to standard breast RT in addition to continuation of trastuzumab to complete one year of treatment (Arm 1), or trastuzumab alone (Arm 2). Endocrine therapy will be recommended for patients with hormone-receptor positive tumors. The primary endpoint is the recurrence-free interval (RFI). Secondary endpoints include time to ipsilateral breast recurrence, locoregional recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival, in addition to the 7-year ipsilateral breast recurrence rate among those not receiving RT. A health-related quality of life sub-study will assess differences in patient-reported breast pain and worry. We estimate a 7-year RFI of 97.5% with RT and allow for a clinically acceptable decrement of 3.63% without RT (7-year RFI of 93.87%; HR 2.5) to establish omission of RT as non-inferior. NRG-BR008 aims to enroll 1,300 patients over 4.5 years, yielding 80% power to detect the non-inferiority of RT omission with a one-sided α=0.05. We expect to observe the required 38 RFI events within 6 years of additional follow-up. The NRG-BR008/HERO trial opened to accrual in March 2023. Accrual is 13/1,300 as of 02-05-2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05705401 .

Abstract PO1-19-01: NRG-BR008: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Optimization for Low-risk HER2-positive Breast Cancer (HERO)

Abstract Background: Breast radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) who undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, the magnitude of benefit of RT is less clear in BCS patients with low-risk disease who receive effective systemic therapy. Among patients with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) BC, 10-year locoregional recurrence has been reported as low as 1.5% following BCS, adjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, and RT. Given these exceedingly favorable outcomes, with the addition of HER2-directed therapy, we seek to evaluate the feasibility of omitting RT among patients with early-stage HER2+ BC following BCS and appropriate systemic therapy. Methods: This is a phase III randomized trial for patients ≥40 years with early-stage, node-negative HER2+ (IHC/FISH) BC treated with BCS with negative margins and sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection. Patients undergoing primary surgery must have pathologic T1 (< 2 cm) N0 disease, while patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy must have clinical T1-2 (with radiographically T< 3.0 cm) N0 disease and exhibit a pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) at surgery. All patients must receive cytotoxic chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, either in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Stratification is by age (< 60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1 cm), estrogen-receptor status (positive; negative), and systemic therapy sequencing (adjuvant vs neoadjuvant). Patients will be randomized to standard breast RT in addition to continuation of trastuzumab to complete a year of treatment (Arm 1), or trastuzumab alone (Arm 2). Endocrine therapy will be recommended for patients with hormone-receptor positive tumors. The primary endpoint is the recurrence-free interval (RFI). Secondary endpoints include the time to ipsilateral breast recurrence, locoregional recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival, in addition to the 7-year ipsilateral breast recurrence rate among those not receiving RT. A health-related quality of life sub-study will assess differences in patient-reported breast pain and worry. We estimate a 7-year RFI of 97.5% with RT and allow for a clinically acceptable decrement of 3.63% without RT (7-year RFI of 93.87%; HR 2.5) to establish omission of RT as non-inferior. NRG-BR008 aims to enroll 1,300 patients over 4.5 years, yielding 80% power to detect the non-inferiority of RT omission with a one-sided α=0.05. We expect to observe the required 38 RFI events within 6 years of additional follow-up. The NRG-BR008/HERO trial opened to accrual in March, 2023. NCT05705401. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Susan G. Komen Foundation (JR) Citation Format: Lior Braunstein, Melissa Mitchell, Hanna Bandos, William Sikov, Atif Khan, Peter Chen, Patricia Ganz, Reshma Jagsi, Julia White, Reena Cecchini, Hyejoo Kang, Shannon Puhalla, Kelly Bolton, Eileen Connolly, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Kimberly Gergelis, Thomas Julian, Eleftherios Mamounas, Norman Wolmark. NRG-BR008: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Optimization for Low-risk HER2-positive Breast Cancer (HERO) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-01.

Effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in non-ischaemic systolic heart failure according to the Heart Failure Collaboratory Medical Therapy Score: extended follow-up of the DANISH trial

Abstract Background The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) has developed a medical therapy score which integrates types and doses of guideline-directed pharmacotherapies in patients with systolic heart failure, providing a measure of treatment quality. In clinical trials, this score may help determine the additive effect of new treatments. In the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure. Purpose Adding four years of additional follow-up to the DANISH trial, we examined the effect of ICD implantation according to baseline modified HFC (mHFC) medical therapy score. Methods In the DANISH trial, 1,116 patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure were randomised to receive an ICD (N = 556) or usual clinical care (N = 560, control group). The primary outcome was death from any cause. In the mHFC score, patients were assigned a score for each drug class of the original cornerstones of systolic heart failure treatment (renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor, beta-blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist). The maximum score was 100%, corresponding to optimal medical therapy with all three types of medication (=>50% of target dose). Results The median mHFC score at baseline was 67% (25th-75th percentile, 67%-100%; range, 17%-100%). During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, the ICD group did not have significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08]). The results were independent of the mHFC score at baseline (mHFC score = < median: HR 0.91 [95% CI, 0.70-1.19]; mHFC score > median: HR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.66-1.14]; P for interaction, 0.94). Similarly, ICD implantation did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular death overall (HR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.09]), and this association was not modified by the mHFC score (mHFC score = < median: HR 0.90 [95% CI, 0.65-1.24]; mHFC score > median: HR 0.84 [95% CI, 0.61-1.15]; P for interaction, 0.89). The ICD group had a significantly lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death in the overall population (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.40-0.92]), and this association was not modified by the mHFC score (mHFC score = < median: HR 0.72 [95% CI, 0.40-1.29]; mHFC score > median: HR 0.53 [95% CI, 0.28-0.99]; P for interaction, 0.59). See Figure for results. Conclusions In this extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure regardless of baseline medical heart failure therapy, assessed by the mHFC score.Modified HFC score in the DANISH trial

Efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in non-ischemic systolic heart failure in patients with and without chronic kidney disease: an extended follow-up analysis of the DANISH trial

Abstract Background Patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) may have an increased risk of death from causes competing with arrhythmic death, which could have implications for the efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Purpose In this extended follow-up study of the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of primary prevention of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart failure on Mortality (DANISH), adding four years of additional follow-up, we examined the long-term effects of primary-prevention ICD implantation, compared with usual medical care, according to baseline CKD status. Methods In the DANISH trial, 1,116 patients with non-ischemic systolic HF were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual care (N=550). Outcomes were analyzed according to CKD status (eGFR ≥/< 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) at baseline. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death and sudden cardiovascular death. Results In total, 1,113 patients had an available eGFR measurement at baseline (median eGFR 73 ml/min/1.73 m2), and 316 (28%) had CKD. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, ICD implantation, compared with usual medical care, did not reduce the rate of death from any cause (no CKD, HR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.64-1.03]; CKD, HR 0.92 [0.68-1.26]; P for interaction=0.31) or cardiovascular death (no CKD, HR 0.76 [0.57-1.02]; CKD, HR 0.95 [0.66-1.36]; P for interaction=0.21), irrespective of baseline CKD status. Similarly, baseline CKD status did not modify the beneficial effects of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (no CKD, HR 0.57 [0.32-1.00]; CKD, HR 0.60 [0.31-1.14]; P for interaction=0.70). Conclusions Primary-prevention ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit regardless of baseline kidney function in patients with non-ischemic systolic heart failure.Figure

Baseline characteristics of a prospective cohort study of aging and cardiovascular diseases among people living with HIV.

Our objective was to report the baseline characteristics of participants in the Canadian HIV and Aging Cohort Study (CHACS) and present amendments to the initial protocol. CHACS is a multi-centred prospective cohort study that was initially set from 2011 to 2016 and will now continue recruitment until 2024. Four additional years of follow-up have been added, and additional outcomes and covariates will be prospectively collected. Frailty will be assessed using a modified version of the Fried's frailty phenotype. The four interrelated aspects of gender-gender roles, gender identity, gender relationships, and institutionalized gender-will be measured using the GENESIS-PRAXY questionnaire. Diet will be assessed using a validated, web-based, self-administered food frequency questionnaire. A total of 1049 participants (77% people living with HIV) were recruited between September 2011 and September 2019. Median age at baseline was 54 years (interquartile range 50-61). Most participants were male (84%) and white (83%). Compared with participants without HIV, those with HIV were more likely to be male; to report lower education levels and incomes; to be more sedentary; to use tobacco, recreational, and prescription drugs; to report a personal history of cardiovascular diseases; and to be frail. The new assessments added to the CHACS protocol will allow for an even more detailed portrait of the pathways leading to accentuated aging for people living with HIV. Participants in the CHACS cohort display important differences in socio-economic and cardiovascular risk factors according to HIV serostatus. These imbalances must be taken into account for all further inferential analyses.

Salpingectomy and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Ontario

A body of pathological and clinical evidence supports the position that the fallopian tube is the site of origin for a large proportion of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Consequently, salpingectomy is now considered for permanent contraception (in lieu of tubal ligation) or ovarian cancer prevention (performed opportunistically at the time of surgical procedures for benign gynecologic conditions). To evaluate the association between salpingectomy and the risk of invasive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. This population-based retrospective cohort study included all women aged 18 to 80 years who were eligible for health care services in Ontario, Canada. Participants were identified using administrative health databases from Ontario between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019. A total of 131 516 women were included in the primary (matched) analysis. Women were followed up until December 31, 2021. Salpingectomy (with and without hysterectomy) vs no pelvic procedure (control condition) among women in the general population. Women with a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy in Ontario between April 1, 1992, and December 31, 2019, were matched 1:3 to women with no pelvic procedure from the general population. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer combined. Among 131 516 women (mean [SD] age, 42.2 [7.6] years), 32 879 underwent a unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy, and 98 637 did not undergo a pelvic procedure. After a mean (range) follow-up of 7.4 (0-29.2) years in the salpingectomy group and 7.5 (0-29.2) years in the nonsurgical control group, there were 31 incident cancers (0.09%) and 117 incident cancers (0.12%), respectively (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.21). The HR for cancer incidence was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.53-1.44) when comparing those with salpingectomy vs those with hysterectomy alone. In this cohort study, no association was found between salpingectomy and the risk of ovarian cancer; however, this observation was based on few incident cases and a relatively short follow-up time. Studies with additional years of follow-up are necessary to define the true level of potential risk reduction with salpingectomy, although longer follow-up will also be a challenge unless collaborative efforts that pool data are undertaken.

Circulatory system disease mortality and occupational exposure to radon progeny in the cohort of Newfoundland Fluorspar Miners between 1950 and 2016

ObjectivesExposure to ionizing radiation may increase the risk of circulatory diseases, including heart disease. A limited number of cohort studies of underground miners have investigated these associations. We previously reported a positive but non-statistically significant association between radon progeny and heart disease in a cohort of Newfoundland fluorspar miners. In this study, we report updated findings that incorporate 15 additional years of follow-up.MethodsThe cohort included 2050 miners who worked in the fluorspar mines from 1933 to 1978. Statistics Canada linked the personal identifying data of the miners to Canadian mortality data to identify deaths from 1950 to 2016. We used previously derived individual-level estimates of annual radon progeny exposure in working-level months. Cumulative exposure was categorized into quantiles. We estimated relative risks and their 95% confidence intervals using Poisson regression for deaths from circulatory, ischemic heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. Relative risks were adjusted for attained age, calendar year, and the average number of cigarettes smoked daily.ResultsRelative to the Newfoundland male population, the standardized mortality ratio for circulatory disease in this cohort was 0.82 (95% CI 0.74–0.91). Those in the highest quantile of cumulative radon progeny exposure had a relative risk of circulatory disease mortality of 1.03 (95% CI 0.76–1.40) compared to those in the lowest quantile. The corresponding estimates for ischemic disease and acute myocardial infarction were 0.99 (95% CI 0.66–1.48), and 1.39 (95% CI 0.84–2.30), respectively.ConclusionsOur findings do not support the hypothesis that occupational exposure to radon progeny increases the risk of circulatory disease.

Autologous Costal Cartilage Grafting for a Large Osteochondral Lesion of the Femoral Head: A 1-Year Single-Arm Study with 2 Additional Years of Follow-up.

There is currently no ideal treatment for osteochondral lesions of the femoral head (OLFH) in young patients. We performed a 1-year single-arm study and 2 additional years of follow-up of patients with a large (defined as >3 cm 2 ) OLFH treated with insertion of autologous costal cartilage graft (ACCG) to restore femoral head congruity after lesion debridement. Twenty patients ≤40 years old who had substantial hip pain and/or dysfunction after nonoperative treatment were enrolled at a single center. The primary outcome was the change in Harris hip score (HHS) from baseline to 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), hip joint space width, subchondral integrity on computed tomography scanning, repair tissue status evaluated with the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, and evaluation of cartilage biochemistry by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping. All 20 enrolled patients (31.02 ± 7.19 years old, 8 female and 12 male) completed the initial study and the 2 years of additional follow-up. The HHS improved from 61.89 ± 6.47 at baseline to 89.23 ± 2.62 at 12 months and 94.79 ± 2.72 at 36 months. The EQ VAS increased by 17.00 ± 8.77 at 12 months and by 21.70 ± 7.99 at 36 months (p < 0.001 for both). Complete integration of the ACCG with the bone was observed by 12 months in all 20 patients. The median MOCART score was 85 (interquartile range [IQR], 75 to 95) at 12 months and 75 (IQR, 65 to 85) at the last follow-up (range, 24 to 38 months). The ACCG demonstrated magnetic resonance properties very similar to hyaline cartilage; the median ratio between the relaxation times of the ACCG and recipient cartilage was 0.95 (IQR, 0.90 to 0.99) at 12 months and 0.97 (IQR, 0.92 to 1.00) at the last follow-up. ACCG is a feasible method for improving hip function and quality of life for at least 3 years in young patients who were unsatisfied with nonoperative treatment of an OLFH. Promising long-term outcomes may be possible because of the good integration between the recipient femoral head and the implanted ACCG. Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in non-ischaemic systolic heart failure: extended follow-up of the DANISH trial

Abstract Background In the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators [ICDs] in Patients with Non-ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH) trial, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure. A high proportion of patients in the DANISH trial received a cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) device, which improves the prognosis in patients with heart failure. Therefore, it is of interest to examine whether the effect of ICD implantation in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure is modified by CRT. Purpose Adding 4 years of additional follow-up to the DANISH trial, we examined the effect of ICD implantation according to status with respect to CRT implantation at baseline. Methods In the DANISH trial, 556 patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure were randomised to receive an ICD and 560 to receive usual clinical care (control). Patients fulfilling indications for a CRT device received a CRT-defibrillator (if randomised to ICD arm) or CRT-pacemaker (if randomised to control arm). In the ICD group, 322 patients (57.9%) received a CRT device; in the control group, 323 patients (57.7%) received a CRT device. In this extended follow-up study, patients were followed until May 18, 2020. The primary outcome was death from any cause; secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death and sudden cardiovascular death. Results During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, the ICD group did not have significantly lower all-cause mortality compared with the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74–1.08]). The results were independent of whether the patient received a CRT device at randomisation (patients with a CRT device: HR 0.92 [95% CI, 0.72–1.18]; patients without a CRT device: HR 0.86 [95% CI, 0.64–1.14]; P for interaction, 0.72). Similarly, ICD implantation did not reduce rates of cardiovascular death overall (HR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70–1.09]), and this association was not modified by CRT (patients with a CRT device: HR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.66–1.19]; patients without a CRT device: HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.60–1.20]; P for interaction, 0.86). The ICD group had significantly lower rates of sudden cardiovascular death in the overall population (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.40–0.92]), and this association was not modified by CRT (patients with a CRT device: HR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.40–1.21]; patients without a CRT device: HR 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26–0.97]; P for interaction, 0.47). See Figure 1 for all results. Conclusions In this extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial, the effect of ICD implantation in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure was not modified by CRT. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The DANISH trial was supported by unrestricted grants from Medtronic, St Jude Medical, Tryg Fonden, and the Danish Heart Foundation. No further funding was obtained for this follow-up study.

Diabetes may modify the efficacy of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in non-ischemic systolic heart failure: an extended follow-up of the DANISH trial

Abstract Background Since patients with both diabetes and heart failure (HF) have a substantially worse prognosis than those with each of these alone, the efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with systolic HF may be modified by diabetes status. Purpose In this extended follow-up analysis of the Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of primary prevention of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart failure on Mortality (DANISH), adding four years of additional follow-up, we examined the long-term effects of primary prophylactic ICD implantation, compared with usual clinical care, in patients with non-ischemic systolic HF according to diabetes status. Methods In DANISH, 1,116 patients with non-ischemic systolic HF were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual clinical care (N=550). Outcomes were analyzed according to diabetes status at baseline. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death and sudden cardiovascular death. Results Of the 1,116 patients randomized in DANISH, 211 (18.9%) had diabetes at baseline (median age 64 year-old, 159 males, median left ventricular ejection fraction 25%). There was a statistically significant interaction between diabetes and the effect of ICD implantation on death from any cause and cardiovascular death. There was a trend toward a reduction in both outcomes with ICD implantation, compared with usual clinical care; in patients without diabetes (death from any cause, HR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.65–1.01]; cardiovascular death, HR 0.77 [0.59–1.01]), but not in those with diabetes (death from any cause, HR 1.19 [0.81–1.74]; cardiovascular death, HR 1.20 [0.79–1.82]) (P for interaction = 0.04 and 0.04 for death from any cause and cardiovascular death, respectively). Although there was no statistically significant interaction between diabetes and the effect of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death, ICD implantation significantly reduced the rate of sudden cardiovascular death in patients without diabetes (HR 0.51 [0.31–0.85]), but not in those with diabetes (HR 0.91 [0.41–1.99]) (P for interaction = 0.15). Conclusions In patients with non-ischemic systolic HF, there was a significant interaction between diabetes and the effect of ICD implantation on death from any cause and cardiovascular death, suggesting that individuals without diabetes may derive greater benefit from ICD implantation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

UPDATED PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL (PFS) AND DEPTH OF RESPONSE IN IKEMA, A RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 TRIAL OF ISATUXIMAB, CARFILZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE (ISA-KD) VS KD IN RELAPSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA (MM)

The anti-CD38 antibody Isa in combination with Kd is approved in various countries for patients (pts) with relapsed MM after ≥1 prior therapy, based on primary interim analysis (IA) of the Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285). Here we report updated efficacy and safety Results from IKEMA. This prespecified final analysis (Isa-Kd 179, Kd 123 pts) evaluated updated PFS (primary endpoint), PFS2, CR rate, MRD- rate, and MRD- and CR rate in ITT population, and safety with 2 additional years of follow-up. Isa 10mg/kg was given IV qw for 4 wks and then q2w; Kd 20/56mg/m² biw, 3/4 weeks. Hydrashift Isa IF assay was used to rule out potential Isa interference in CR determination. At cutoff (14Jan2022; median follow-up 44 mo), 49 (27.4%) Isa-Kd, 11 (8.9%) Kd pts were still on treatment. Updated PFS was consistent with primary IA Results, showing significant benefit of Isa-Kd (vs Kd): PFS HR 0.58; PFS2 HR 0.68. Final CR rate (Isa-Kd vs Kd) was 44.1% vs 28.5%, MRD- rate 33.5% vs 15.4%, MRD- and CR rate 26.3% vs 12.2% ( Table ). Serious TEAEs were reported in 70.1% Isa-Kd vs 59.8% Kd pts. The most common, any-grade non-hematologic TEAEs in Isa-Kd were infusion reactions (45.8%), diarrhea (39.5%), hypertension (37.9%) and upper respiratory tract infection (37.3%). These Results show unprecedented mPFS, CR rate, MRD- and MRD- CR rates in a non-lenalidomide containing regimen with benefit maintained through subsequent therapies and a manageable safety profile. Safety profiles and efficacy Results in both arms were consistent with prior IKEMA findings. Our findings support Isa-Kd as a standard of care treatment for pts with relapsed MM.

UPDATED PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AND DEPTH OF RESPONSE IN IKEMA, A RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 TRIAL OF ISATUXIMAB, CARFILZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE VS CARFILZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE IN RELAPSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

The anti-CD38 antibody Isa in combination with Kd is approved in various countries for patients (pts) with relapsed MM after ≥1 prior therapy, based on primary interim analysis (IA) of the Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285). Here we report updated efficacy and safety results from IKEMA. This prespecified final analysis (179 pts randomized to Isa-Kd, 123 to Kd) evaluated updated PFS (primary endpoint), PFS2, minimal residual disease negativity (MRD-) rate, complete response (CR) rate, MRD- and CR rate in ITT population, and safety with 2 additional years of follow-up. Isa 10 mg/kg was given IV weekly for 4 wks and then every 2 wks; Kd (20/56 mg/m 2 , twice weekly, 3/4 weeks) was administered in both arms. At cutoff (14-Jan-2022) with a median (m) follow-up of 44-months, 49 (27.4%) pts in Isa-Kd and 11 (8.9%) in Kd were still on treatment. The updated PFS update was consistent with the IA results, showing significant benefit in favor of Isa-Kd: HR 0.58 (95.4% CI 0.42–0.79) with median (m) PFS 35.7 mo (95% CI: 25.8-44.0) vs 19.2 mo (95% CI: 15.8-25.0) in Isa-Kd vs Kd. PFS2 HR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.50–0.94) with mPFS2 47.2 mo (95% CI: 38.1-NC) vs 35.6 mo (95% CI: 24.0-40.5) in Isa-Kd vs Kd. With additional follow up and using the Hydrashift Isa immunofixation assay to rule out potential Isa interference in CR determination, final CR rate (Isa-Kd vs Kd) was 44.1% (95% CI: 0.37–0.52) vs 28.5% (95% CI: 20.7–37.3) (OR = 2.09, 95%CI = 1.26–3.48); ORR was 86.6% (95% CI: 0.81–0.91) vs 83.7% (95% CI: 0.76–0.90); MRD- was reached in 33.5% (95% CI: 0.27–0.41) vs 15.4% (95% CI: 0.10–0.23) pts (OR = 2.78, 95%CI = 1.55–4.99); rate of MRD- CR pts was 26.3% (95% CI: 0.20–0.33) vs 12.2% (95% CI: 0.07–0.19) (OR = 2.57, 95%CI=1.35–4.88). Safety profiles in both arms remain consistent with prior IKEMA findings. Serious TEAEs were reported in 70.1% of Isa-Kd pts vs 59.8% in Kd. The most common, any-grade non-hematologic TEAEs in Isa-Kd were infusion reaction (45.8%), diarrhea (39.5%), hypertension (37.9%) and upper respiratory tract infection (37.3%). These results show unprecedented mPFS, CR rate, MRD- and MRD- CR rates in a non-lenalidomide containing regimen with benefit maintained through subsequent therapies and a manageable safety profile. Our findings support Isa-Kd as a standard of care treatment for pts with relapsed MM. Study funded by Sanofi. Philippe Moreau and Thomas Martin are Co-primary investigators. Abstract previously presented at ESMO/COMy 2022.

Atrazine use and cancer risk within the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) cohort: An update

In the United States, atrazine is a common agricultural herbicide. Few epidemiologic studies have evaluated cancer risks associated with this ubiquitous chemical. A previous analysis within the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) in 2011 found limited evidence of cancer risk based on 3,146 exposed cases. Here, we updated that analysis with additional follow-up time and exposure information. Information about lifetime pesticide use was reported on questionnaires at enrollment (1993-1997) and follow-up (1999-2005). Among 53,508 pesticide applicators in Iowa (IA) and North Carolina (NC), there were 6,401 incident exposed cancer cases identified through linkage to state cancer registries through 2017 (IA) and 2014 (NC). We evaluated cumulative intensity-weighted lifetime days of atrazine use. Atrazine exposures were categorized into quartiles among users and compared to a non-exposed referent group. Poisson regression was applied to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for age, smoking status and pack-years, alcohol use, family cancer history, and correlated pesticides. We also stratified by age at cancer diagnosis. Approximately 71% of applicators reported ever using atrazine. Greater use of atrazine was associated with increased risk of cancers of the lung (RRQ4=1.21, CI=0.95-1.55, p-trend=0.19, n=551 cases), and prostate (RRQ4=1.12, CI=0.98-1.28, p-trend=0.10, n=2,521); the association was stronger for aggressive prostate cancer (RRQ4=1.37, CI=1.02-1.84, p-trend=0.07, n=553). The association with prostate cancer was most pronounced among those diagnosed &amp;#x3c;50 years of age (RRQ4=3.53, CI=1.34-9.29, p-interaction=0.012). Associations with lung cancer did not vary by age. Our findings with an average of 8.5 years of additional follow-up and twice as many cases compared to a previous analysis, suggest increased risk of prostate and lung cancers is associated with atrazine use. The associations with prostate cancer were most notable among those diagnosed at younger ages and those with aggressive disease. Further work is needed to investigate the reasons for these observations.

Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure According to Sex: Extended Follow-Up Study of the DANISH Trial.

Men and women may respond differently to certain therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). In an extended follow-up study of the DANISH trial (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), adding 4 years of additional follow-up, we examined the effect of ICD implantation according to sex. In the DANISH trial, 1116 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD (N=556) or usual clinical care (N=550). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Of the 1116 patients randomized in the DANISH trial, 307 (27.5%) were women. During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, women had a lower associated rate of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.47-0.78]) cardiovascular death (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.46-0.84]), nonsudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42-0.85]), and a numerically lower rate of sudden cardiovascular death (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.40-1.25]), compared with men. Compared with usual clinical care, ICD implantation did not reduce the rate of all-cause mortality, irrespective of sex (men, HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.06]; women, HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.64-1.50]; Pinteraction=0.51). In addition, sex did not modify the effect of ICD implantation on sudden cardiovascular death (men, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.36-0.92]; women, HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.26-1.77]; Pinteraction=0.76). In patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit, but reduced sudden cardiovascular death, irrespective of sex. URL: https://www. gov; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.

1257P Apatinib plus POF (paclitaxel plus FOLFOX) in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve advanced gastric cancer (TNAGC): Update from the phase I study (SYLT 007)

The phase I SYLT 007 study (ESMO 2020) suggested that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of apatinib did not reach with apatinib up to 850 mg daily plus POF in TNAGC. We present results of SYLT 007 in TNAGC after 2 additional years of follow-up (cutoff: Mar 30, 2022). This was a phase I single center study with standard 3+3 design for pts with TNAGC. The primary endpoints are determining dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and MTD. The study included 6 escalating dl of apatinib (250, 375, 500, 625, 750, and 850mg daily) plus POF, consisted of paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, followed by mFOLFOX6 omitted 5-Fu bolus, every 14 days repeated. Eligible pts had ECOG PS 0-1, age 18-70, and adequate organ function. DLT was any treatment-related hematologic ≥ grade 4 toxicity (except for neutropenia lasting for ≤ 5 days), or non-hematologic ≥ grade 3 toxicity (except for nausea and vomiting that could be improved with optimal supportive care, escalation of ALP). Twenty-three pts were treated in 6 different dl of apatinib plus POF (3 in each dl, except for 5 in dl 625 mg and 6 in dl 850 mg). Median age was 55 years (range 25-69) with 69.6% male. One pts (1/6) had DLT at dl 850 mg with herpes in perineum and grade 3 stomatitis. Of 16 evaluable pts, 13 (81.25%) were PR, 1 was SD, 2 was PD). Median PFS was 10.6m (95%CI 6.91-14.29m). Median OS was 18.667m (95%CI 10.443-26.891m). Most frequent of toxicity were anemia (82.6%), hypoalbuminemia (73.9%), and neutropenia (69.6%). Interestingly, patients with the high-dose apatinib (625, 750, and 850mg daily) plus POF were associated with better ORR (90.9% 10/11), DCR (100% 11/11), and longer mPFS (10.67m 95%CI 10.16-11.18m) and mOS (19.9m 95%CI 14.75-25.05m). Of the 5 pts who survived for more than 30 months, 2 accepted the re-challenge of the original protocol (625mg, 850mg respectively), 1 received immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy (750mg), 1 underwent radical surgery and is now free of recurrence (850mg), 1 received S-1 plus apatinib maintenance (850mg). Five evaluable pts in dl 850mg were all PR and 3 of them survived more than 30 months. High-dose apatinib plus POF had encouraging antitumor activity with manageable safety profile in TNAGC.

Three-year follow-up of outcomes with KTE-X19 in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in ZUMA-2.

7518 Background: Brexucabtagene autoleucel (KTE-X19) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In ZUMA-2, a 93% objective response rate (ORR; 67% complete response [CR] rate) was reported with KTE-X19 in pts with R/R MCL (median follow-up: 12.3 mo; 60 efficacy-evaluable pts; Wang et al. N Engl J Med. 2020). Here, we present updated outcomes with 2 years of additional follow-up. Methods: Adult pts (≥18 years) with R/R MCL underwent leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy followed by a single infusion of KTE-X19. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was an exploratory endpoint (sensitivity 10-5) evaluated in peripheral blood using next-generation sequencing. Updated results are reported for all 68 treated pts. Results: After 35.6 mo median follow-up, the ORR (CR + partial response) was 91% (95% CI, 81.8-96.7), with a 68% CR rate (95% CI, 55.2-78.5). The median duration of response (DOR) was 28.2 mo (95% CI, 13.5-47.1), with 25 of 68 treated pts (37%) still in ongoing response (all CR) at data cutoff. Late relapse &gt; 24 mo post-infusion was infrequent (n = 3). The medians for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 25.8 mo (95% CI, 9.6-47.6) and 46.6 mo (95% CI, 24.9-not estimable), respectively. MRD was analyzed in 29 pts total; 24 of 29 were MRD-negative at mo 1, and 15 of 19 with available data were MRD-negative at mo 6. At data cutoff, the medians for DOR, PFS, and OS in the 15 MRD-negative pts were all not reached, vs 6.1, 7.1, and 27.0 mo, in the 4 MRD-positive pts, respectively. MRD-negative status at mo 1, 3, and 6 was associated with durable response, with 55%, 71%, and 69% of MRD-negative pts at those timepoints remaining in ongoing CR at data cutoff. Circulating tumor DNA analysis of MRD at mo 3 and 6 was predictive of relapse (AUC 0.80 and 0.75, respectively). No new safety signals were observed. Only 3% of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of interest occurred since the primary report. The most frequent Grade ≥3 AE was neutropenia (1 [1%] Grade 3; 7 [10%] Grade 4). Two pts had KTE-X19-related Grade 3 serious infections: pneumonia and upper respiratory tract infection (n = 1); influenza (n = 1). There were no new cytokine release syndrome AEs and 1 new serious neurologic AE of Grade 3 encephalopathy (13.0 mo post-infusion) that was considered not related to study treatment. Three new Grade 5 AEs occurred, none of which were considered related to study treatment: Salmonella bacteremia (24.9 mo post-infusion), myelodysplastic syndrome (25.2 mo post-infusion), and acute myeloid leukemia (37.5 mo post-infusion). Conclusions: These data represent the longest follow-up of CAR T-cell therapy in pts with MCL to date and suggest that KTE-X19 induces durable long-term responses with manageable safety and low late relapse potential in R/R MCL. Clinical trial information: NCT02601313.

Updated efficacy and safety of KEYNOTE-224: a phase II study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib

ObjectivePembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, demonstrated anti-tumour activity and tolerability in patients treated with sorafenib and with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-224. Longer-term efficacy and safety after ∼2.5 years of additional follow-up are reported. Patients and methodsAdults with confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma who experienced progression after or intolerance to sorafenib treatment received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles or until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or investigator decision. The primary end-point was objective response rate assessed by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1. The secondary end-points included duration of response, disease control rate, time to progression, progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse events. ResultsEfficacy and safety were assessed in 104 patients. The median time from first dose to data cutoff was 45.1 months (range, 41.3–49.3). Objective response rate was 18.3% (95% CI: 11.4–27.1), and median duration of response was 21.0 months (range, 3.1 to 39.5+). Disease control rate was 61.5%, and median time to progression was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.9–7.0). Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.5–6.7) and median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI: 9.7–15.3). Of 104 patients, 76 (73.1%) patients reported treatment-related adverse events; most were low grade in severity (grade 3–4, n = 26 [25.0%]; grade 5, n = 1 [1.0%]). Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in 3 patients (all grade 3). No viral-induced hepatitis flares occurred. ConclusionsAfter ∼2.5 years of additional follow-up, pembrolizumab continued to provide durable anti-tumour activity and no new safety concerns were identified. ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02702414.

Cancer risk among World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers: A review.

Twenty years after the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks, the association between exposures present at the World Trade Center (WTC) site and the risk of several specific types of cancer has been reported among rescue and recovery workers. The authors' objective was to conduct an updated review of these data. Most studies have found elevated rates of both prostate and thyroid cancers compared with rates in the general population, and some have reported statistically significant differences for the rates of all cancers as well. Studies including a larger combined cohort of WTC-exposed rescue and recovery workers from 3 main cohorts have since replicated findings for these cancers, with additional years of follow-up. Among this combined cohort, although a lower-than-expected standardized incidence ratio for all cancers was observed, WTC exposure was also related to an increased risk of cutaneous melanoma and tonsil cancer. Importantly, another study found that WTC-exposed rescue and recovery workers who are enrolled in the federally funded medical monitoring and treatment program experienced improved survival post-cancer diagnosis compared with New York state patients with cancer. On the basis of these combined cohort studies, the full effect of WTC exposure on cancer risk is becoming clearer. Consequently, the authors believe that surveillance of those with WTC exposure should be continued, and in-depth analysis of epidemiologic, molecular, and clinical aspects of specific cancers in these workers should be pursued.

Racial Disparities in Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Diet, Lifestyle, Family History, and Screening Patterns.

Racial disparities in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates are considerable. We previously found in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) that African-American men had an 80% higher prostate cancer risk than White men. With 21 additional years of follow-up and four-fold increase in cases, we undertook a contemporary analysis of racial differences in prostate cancer incidence and mortality in HPFS. For 47,679 men, we estimated HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between race and risk of prostate cancer through 2016 using Cox proportional hazards regression. Multivariable models (mHR) were adjusted for lifestyle, diet, family history, and PSA screening collected on biennial questionnaires. 6,909 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed in White, 89 in African-American, and 90 in Asian-American men. African-Americans had higher prostate cancer incidence (mHR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62) and mortality (mHR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.00-2.78), and lower PSA screening prevalence than White men. The excess risk was greater in the pre-PSA screening era (HR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.14-2.48) than the PSA screening era (HR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.93-1.56). Asian-Americans had lower prostate cancer risk (mHR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.92), but similar risk of fatal disease compared with white men. Racial differences in prostate cancer incidence and mortality in HPFS are not fully explained by differences in lifestyle, diet, family history, or PSA screening. Additional research is necessary to address the disproportionately higher rates of prostate cancer in African-American men.