Add-on Hydrochlorothiazide Research Articles

Response of fibroblast growth factor 23 to volume interventions in arterial hypertension and diabetic nephropathy.

Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) rises progressively in chronic kidney disease and is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. FGF-23 putatively induces volume retention by upregulating the sodium-chloride cotransporter (NCC). We studied whether, conversely, interventions in volume status affect FGF-23 concentrations.We performed a post hoc analysis of 1) a prospective saline infusion study with 12 patients with arterial hypertension who received 2 L of isotonic saline over 4 hours, and 2) a randomized controlled trial with 45 diabetic nephropathy (DN) patients on background angiotensin-converting enzyme -inhibition (ACEi), who underwent 4 6-week treatment periods with add-on hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) or placebo, combined with regular sodium (RS) or low sodium (LS) diet in a cross-over design. Plasma C-terminal FGF-23 was measured by ELISA (Immutopics) after each treatment period in DN and before and after saline infusion in hypertensives.The patients with arterial hypertension were 45 ± 13 (mean ± SD) years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 101 ± 18 mL/min/1.73 m2. Isotonic saline infusion did not affect FGF-23 (before infusion: 68 median [first to third quartile: 58–97] relative unit (RU)/mL, after infusion: 67 [57–77] RU/mL, P = 0.37). DN patients were 65 ± 9 years old. During ACEi + RS treatment, eGFR was 65 ± 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 and albuminuria 649 mg/d (230–2008 mg/d). FGF23 level was 94 (73–141) RU/mL during ACEi therapy. FGF-23 did not change significantly by add-on HCT (99 [74–148] RU/mL), LS diet (99 [75–135] RU/mL), or their combination (111 [81–160] RU/mL, P = 0.15).Acute and chronic changes in volume status did not materially change FGF-23 in hypertensive patients and DN, respectively. Our data do not support a direct feedback loop between volume status and FGF-23 in hypertension or DN.

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of the Oral Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren with Optional Add-On Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Hypertension

Background: Most patients with hypertension will require combination therapy with at least two agents from different antihypertensive classes to achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Thiazide diuretics, such as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), are widely used in combination therapy. The volume reduction with these agents stimulates the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), making RAS inhibitors such as the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren a logical choice for combination therapy with HCTZ. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, with or without addition of the diuretic HCTZ. Methods: In the 12-month core study, patients with hypertension (mean sitting diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg and <110 mmHg) were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to once-daily aliskiren 150 mg or 300 mg. At months 2, 3,4, 6 and 9, treatment was adjusted in patients not achieving a BP goal of <140/90mmHg. Patients not at goal on aliskiren 150 mg once daily were up-titrated to aliskiren 300 mg once daily. Patients not at goal with aliskiren 300 mg once daily received addon HCTZ 12.5 mg once daily, which was up-titrated to 25 mg once daily if BP remained inadequately controlled. At month 12, patients who received aliskiren/HCTZ 300 mg/25 mg once daily for at least 8 months in the core study were eligible to enter a 4-month extension study. Results: Overall, 1625/1955 patients completed the core study, and 870/1955 patients received add-on HCTZ; 189/198 patients completed the 4-month extension. Aliskiren, with or without add-on HCTZ, was generally well tolerated; the incidence of adverse events (AEs) during the core study was similar among the four final treatment groups. The most frequently reported AEs in the core and extension studies were mild and transient cases of nasopharyngitis, headache and dizziness. Few patients exhibited laboratory abnormalities. Overall, aliskiren, with or without add-on HCTZ, reduced mean BP by 18.0/12.7mmHg at core study endpoint, and 61.2% of patients achieved BP control. BP reductions with aliskiren/HCTZ 300 mg/25 mg combination therapy at the core study endpoint were maintained during the extension study. Conclusion: In patients with hypertension, long-term treatment with aliskiren, with or without add-on HCTZ, is well tolerated and provides effective BP lowering that is sustained over 12 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00219037.

Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of benidipine and its effects on cardiac structure and function in elderly Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension: an open-label, long-term study

Benidipine (CAS 91599-74-5) has been reported as an effective antihypertensive treatment and its cardioprotective effects have been shown in several basic and clinical studies. However, the long-term efficacy and safety of benidipine remain unknown in elderly Chinese patient with hypertension. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial, 152 eligible patients aged 60 to 75 years with mild to moderate essential hypertension (sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) > or = 140 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic BP > or = 90 mmHg) entered a 52-week study. All patients initially received benidipine 2-4 mg once a day, followed by titration to benidipine 8 mg/day to achieve the target BP (< 140/90 mmHg in non-diabetics and <130/80 mmHg in diabetics). Add-on hydrochlorothiazide (CAS 58-93-5) and/or metoprolol tartaric acid (CAS 3750-58-6) were permitted during the study. Overall, 132 patients completed the 52-week treatment with benidipine as monotherapy or combination therapy. It showed that the regimen based on benidipine provided an obvious mean trough BP reduction of 13.8 +/- 12.4/8.3 +/- 9.2 mmHg (p < 0.001), and 62.5% of patients reached the target BP. In patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, the left ventricular mass index significantly decreased from 147.1 +/- 27.6 g/m2 at baseline to 136.0 +/- 17.5 g/m2 at 52 weeks (p = 0.036). Clinical adverse events (AEs) were found in 15.1% of all patients, and six patients discontinued the treatment due to drug-related AEs during the entire trial. Patients' compliance was an average of 98.7%. Benidipine, with a favorable tolerability profile, provides a long-term antihypertensive effect and potential benefit for the heart in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertensive, suggesting that it is suitable for elderly patients with hypertension.

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of the Oral Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren with Optional Add-On Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Hypertension

Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of the Oral Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren with Optional Add-On Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients with Hypertension

Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of combination therapy with aliskiren and amlodipine in patients with hypertension

ABSTRACTObjective: Most patients with hypertension require antihypertensive combination therapy to achieve BP control. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren combined with the calcium channel blocker amlodipine.Methods: Overall, 556 patients with hypertension (msDBP ≥95−<110 mmHg) received open-label aliskiren/amlodipine 150/5 mg for 2 weeks, followed by forced titration to aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg for 52 weeks. Add-on hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) was permitted from week 10 to achieve BP control (<140/90 mmHg). The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of aliskiren/amlodipine combination therapy; the BP-lowering efficacy of the combination was also assessed (week 54 endpoint; last observation carried forward).Results: In total, 452 patients completed 54 weeks’ treatment with aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg, with or without add-on HCT. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were peripheral edema, upper respiratory tract infection, headache and bronchitis. Peripheral edema (the most common AE), occurred in 22.7% of treated patients, and was generally mild or moderate in intensity and transient in nature. Few patients exhibited laboratory abnormalities. Aliskiren/amlodipine combination therapy provided a mean BP reduction from baseline to week 54 of 24.2/15.5 mmHg; 74.3% of patients achieved BP control. In the subgroup of patients with stage 2 hypertension (baseline msSBP ≥160 mmHg and/or msDBP ≥100 mmHg), the mean BP reduction at week 54 was 29.1/17.1 mmHg, and 67.0% of patients achieved BP control.Conclusion: In this open-label study, aliskiren/amlodipine 300/10 mg combination therapy, with or without add-on HCT, effectively reduced BP, particularly in patients with stage 2 hypertension. The most common AE was peripheral edema, consistent with the known AE profile of high-dose (10 mg) amlodipine. Further studies comparing the aliskiren/amlodipine combination with the component monotherapies and other antihypertensive combinations are warranted.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00402103.

Add-On Benefits of Amlodipine and Thiazide in Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 1/2 Patients Treated with Valsartan

Hypertension frequently requires combination therapy to attain efficient control to prevent cardiovascular diseases effectively. This study was conducted to determine which add-on treatment is better, namely calcium channel blockers or diuretics, in improving vascular damage. In 70 nondiabetic chronic kidney disease stage 1/2 patients who had been already treated with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker valsartan for at least 12 months, amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide was added to their existing medication. Pulse wave velocity (PWV), intima-media thickness (IMT) of the carotid arteries, urinary albumin excretion (UAE), and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) were determined before and 12 months after the start of add-on treatments. Add-on amlodipine and add-on hydrochlorothiazide significantly and similarly decreased 24-hour ambulatory BP by 18 and 19 mm Hg, respectively, PWV by 206 and 184 cm/s, respectively, and UAE, but did not change the IMT. The decreases in BP significantly contributed to the decreases in PWV and UAE and suggested that the decrease in serum cholesterol level brought about by add-on amlodipine also contributed to the decrease in UAE. These results suggest that 12 months of add-on treatment with either amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide could have beneficial effects in nondiabetic chronic kidney disease stage 1/2 patients already being treated with valsartan.

Adverse renal effects of hydrochlorothiazide in rats with myocardial infarction treated with an ACE inhibitor

Diuretics, when added to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) treatment, can augment the response to ACE inhibitors, but may have adverse effects on renal function, which negatively affect prognosis. While in heart failure rats combined therapy initially improved cardiac function and prognosis, this benefit was completely lost at later stages. We now studied renal effects of adding hydrochlorothiazide to ACE inhibitor after myocardial infarction in rats. Rats were randomized to ACE inhibitor quinapril monotherapy or quinapril with add-on hydrochlorothiazide. Survival was monitored for 14 months. Plasma creatinine, measured at 4 months, was increased by 40% in quinapril with add-on hydrochlorothiazide compared to quinapril. Although overall 14-months mortality was similar in quinapril with add-on hydrochlorothiazide and quinapril, stratification based on plasma creatinine showed increased mortality in the tertile with highest plasma creatinine ( P = 0.03, Log rank). With add-on hydrochlorotiazide, renal morphology displayed severe renal interstitial lesions; tubular dilatation and fibrosis. Interstitial myofibroblast transformation (α-smooth muscle actine staining) was increased at 8 and 14 months, and coincided with collagen deposition and interstitial inflammation (macrophage influx). In rats with quinapril monotherapy or untreated rats, renal structure was normal. Thus, adding hydrochlorotiazide to ACE inhibitor detrimentally affected not only renal function, but also renal structure in rats with myocardial infarction. Altered pharmacokinetics, resulting from a vicious circle of reduced renal function and increased circulating drug levels, may provide an explanation for the adverse renal effects and may exert unfavorable effects on long-term prognosis after myocardial infarction.

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in obese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the SMOOTH study

BackgroundThe Study of Micardis (telmisartan) in Overweight/Obese patients with Type 2 diabetes and Hypertension (SMOOTH) compared hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) plus telmisartan or valsartan fixed-dose combination therapies on early morning blood pressure (BP), using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM).MethodsSMOOTH was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multicentre trial. After a 2- to 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients received once-daily telmisartan 80 mg or valsartan 160 mg for 4 weeks, with add-on HCTZ 12.5 mg for 6 weeks (T/HCTZ or V/HCTZ, respectively). At baseline and week 10, ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was measured every 20 min and hourly means were calculated. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP; DBP) during the last 6 hours of the 24-hour dosing interval.ResultsIn total, 840 patients were randomized. At week 10, T/HCTZ provided significantly greater reductions versus V/HCTZ in the last 6 hours mean ABP (differences in favour of T/HCTZ: SBP 3.9 mm Hg, p < 0.0001; DBP 2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.0007). T/HCTZ also produced significantly greater reductions than V/HCTZ in 24-hour mean ABP (differences in favour of T/HCTZ: SBP 3.0 mm Hg, p = 0.0002; DBP 1.6 mm Hg, p = 0.0006) and during the morning, daytime and night-time periods (p < 0.003). Both treatments were well tolerated.ConclusionIn high-risk, overweight/obese patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes, T/HCTZ provides significantly greater BP lowering versus V/HCTZ throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, particularly during the hazardous early morning hours.

Beneficial effects of add‐on hydrochlorothiazide in rats with myocardial infarction optimally treated with quinapril

The antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of ACE inhibitor (ACEi) therapy are enhanced by inducing a negative sodium balance. Whether this strategy also improves outcome of chronic ACEi treatment after myocardial infarction (MI) is unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or dietary sodium restriction further improves survival in ACEi-treated rats with MI. MI was induced by coronary ligation. After 2 weeks rats were randomised to quinapril (QUI), HCTZ added to quinapril (QUI+HCTZ), or low sodium diet added to quinapril (QUI+LS). Survival was monitored for 62 weeks, after which left ventricular (LV) pressures were measured and blood for neurohumoral characterisation was collected. A separate group of rats, subjected to the same procedure, was evaluated after 35 weeks. After 62 weeks, mortality was comparable in all groups. However, survival was improved by HCTZ until 35 weeks. This effect on survival was paralleled by decreased proteinuria and LV end-diastolic pressures in QUI+HCTZ rats at 35, but not 62 weeks. Plasma renin activity was significantly decreased in QUI+HCTZ rats at 35 weeks. Contrary to HCTZ, LS added to QUI caused no benefit. Adding HCTZ, but not LS, to quinapril improved survival, neurohumoral status, and proteinuria during the early chronic phase of experimental post-MI LV dysfunction. Since no adverse effects were observed, HCTZ may safely be used to improve ACEi therapy.

Effects of eplerenone versus losartan in patients with low-renin hypertension

Sodium retention and volume expansion, mediated in part by aldosterone, are prominent features in low-renin hypertension. Agents that block aldosterone at its receptor sites, therefore, should have significant clinical benefit in patients with low-renin hypertension. This 16-week, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, titration-to-effect trial compared the blood pressure and neurohumoral responses of the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone (100-200 mg/d; n = 86) with those of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan (50-100 mg/d; n = 82) in patients with low-renin hypertension (active renin < or = 25 pg/mL [< or = 42.5 mU/L]). Patients with diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg after 8 weeks of monotherapy received add-on therapy with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 to 25 mg daily. After 8 weeks of therapy, eplerenone reduced blood pressure to a greater extent than losartan (systolic blood pressure -15.8 vs -10.1 mm Hg, P = .017; diastolic blood pressure -9.3 vs -6.7 mm Hg, P = .05). After 16 weeks of therapy, significantly fewer eplerenone-treated patients (32.5%) than losartan-treated patients (55.6%) required add-on hydrochlorothiazide as allowed per protocol for blood pressure control (P = .003). Eplerenone consistently reduced blood pressure regardless of baseline active plasma renin levels whereas losartan reduced blood pressure more effectively in patients with higher baseline active renin levels. There were no differences between treatments in adverse events (reported by 62.8% of eplerenone patients and by 72.0% of losartan patients). These data show that eplerenone was more effective than losartan in reducing blood pressure in patients with low-renin hypertension. Further studies evaluating the efficacy of eplerenone in difficult-to-treat or resistant hypertension are needed.

Safety and efficacy of combination ace inhibitor/calcium channel blocker therapy versus ace inhibitor monotherapy in african american patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes

P-401 Key Words: Combination Therapy, Diabetes, Hypertension

Long-term Exposure to Telmisartan as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy: Efficacy and Safety

This multicentre, open-label extension study to four controlled trials involved 888 patients with mild-tomoderate primary hypertension. Patients received telmisartan 40-80 mg once daily with add-on hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ; 12.5-25 mg) if necessary and/or other antihypertensives to achieve diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control (<90 mmHg). Treatment continued for up to 4 years. At treatment end, 578 (65.1%) patients were on telmisartan monotherapy, 106 (11.9%) were on telmisartan + HCTZ 12.5 mg, 101 (11.4%) were on telmisartan + HCTZ 25 mg, and 103 (11.6%) were on telmisartan + another antihypertensive - HCTZ. Overall, 84.4% (746/884) patients achieved DBP control. The highest proportion of responders was in the telmisartan monotherapy (40 or 80 mg) treatment category (89.0% [511/574 patients]). The mean change in systolic blood pressure (SBP)/DBP from the previous trial baseline to last available trough was-21.2/-17.3 mmHg with telmisartan alone,-24.6/-16.7 mmHg with telmisartan + HCTZ, and-18.7/-14.9 mmHg with telmisartan + another antihypertensive - HCTZ. Most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity and unrelated to treatment. The proportions of patients discontinuing the study due to adverse events, by treatment at onset, were 7.3% (65/888) with telmisartan monotherapy, 6.6% (20/304) with telmisartan + HCTZ and 2.9% (3/103) with telmisartan + another antihypertensive - HCTZ. There were 15 deaths during the study, but none was considered drug related. Thus, telmisartan alone or in combination with other antihypertensives achieved and maintained clinically relevant reductions in DBP and SBP. This long-term analysis supports the favourable efficacy and safety profile of telmisartan both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive drugs.

Comparison of 26-week efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan and atenolol, in combination with hydrochlorothiazide as required, in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a randomized, multicenter study

Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan, a novel antihypertensive agent, and atenolol, a well-established beta-blocker, in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Methods: This 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, titration-to-response study compared doses of telmisartan (40 mg titrated to 80 mg titrated to 120 mg) with atenolol (50 mg titrated to 100 mg) required to achieve diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control (≤90 mm Hg or a decrease from baseline of ≥10 mm Hg). Open-label hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 or 25 mg was added if needed according to a prespecified titration rule. Men and women aged > 18 years with mild to moderate hypertension (morning mean supine DBP [SDBP] ≥95 mm Hg and ≤114 mm Hg) were eligible to participate. Patients with significant cardiovascular, metabolic, hepatic, or renal dysfunction or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. The primary efficacy end point was trough SDBP response at 26 weeks; secondary efficacy end points included changes from baseline at trough in both standing and supine DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP), and heart rate after 4, 8, 16, and 26 weeks; SBP control (reduction from baseline of ≥10 mm Hg); normalization of supine SDBP to ≤90 mm Hg; and the need for add-on HCTZ. Changes in quality of life were also examined. Adverse events were obtained from spontaneous reporting and recorded. Serious adverse events were reported to the sponsor according to predefined timelines.