Adaptive Statistical Iterative reconstruction-V Research Articles

Detectability of Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions with Deep Learning CT Reconstruction: A Phantom and Patient Study.

Background CT deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) improves image quality by reducing noise compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). However, objective assessment of low-contrast lesion detectability is lacking. Purpose To investigate low-contrast detectability of hypoattenuating liver lesions on CT scans reconstructed with DLIR compared with CT scans reconstructed with ASIR-V in a patient and a phantom study. Materials and Methods This single-center retrospective study included patients undergoing portal venous phase abdominal CT between February and May 2021 and a low-contrast-resolution phantom scanned with the same protocol. Four reconstructions (ASIR-V at 40% strength [ASIR-V 40] and DLIR at three strengths) were generated. Five radiologists qualitatively assessed the images using the five-point Likert scale for image quality, lesion diagnostic confidence, conspicuity, and small lesion (≤1 cm) visibility. Up to two key lesions per patient, confirmed at histopathologic testing or at prior or follow-up imaging studies, were included. Lesion-to-background contrast-to-noise ratio was calculated. Interreader variability was analyzed. Intergroup qualitative and quantitative metrics were compared between DLIR and ASIR-V 40 using proportional odds logistic regression models. Results Eighty-six liver lesions (mean size, 15 mm ± 9.5 [SD]) in 50 patients (median age, 62 years [IQR, 57-73 years]; 27 [54%] female patients) were included. Differences were not detected for various qualitative low-contrast detectability metrics between ASIR-V 40 and DLIR (P > .05). Quantitatively, medium-strength DLIR and high-strength DLIR yielded higher lesion-to-background contrast-to-noise ratios than ASIR-V 40 (medium-strength DLIR vs ASIR-V 40: odds ratio [OR], 1.96 [95% CI: 1.65, 2.33]; high-strength DLIR vs ASIR-V 40: OR, 5.36 [95% CI: 3.68, 7.82]; P < .001). Low-contrast lesion attenuation was reduced by 2.8-3.6 HU with DLIR. Interreader agreement was moderate to very good for the qualitative metrics. Subgroup analysis based on lesion size of larger than 1 cm and 1 cm or smaller yielded similar results (P > .05). Qualitatively, phantom study results were similar to those in patients (P > .05). Conclusion The detectability of low-contrast liver lesions was similar on CT scans reconstructed with low-, medium-, and high-strength DLIR and ASIR-V 40 in both patient and phantom studies. Lesion-to-background contrast-to-noise ratios were higher for DLIR medium- and high-strength reconstructions compared with ASIR-V 40. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Application value of individualized tube voltage, contrast injection, and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V algorithm based on body mass index in renal computed tomography angiography for radiation and iodinated contrast dose reduction.

To explore the application value of body mass index (BMI)-based kilovoltage peak (kVp) selection and contrast injection protocol combined with different adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) strengths in renal computed tomography angiography (CTA) in reducing radiation and contrast medium (CM) doses. One-hundred renal CTA patients were prospectively enrolled and were divided into individualized kVp group (group A, n = 50) and conventional 100kVp group (group B, n = 50), both with automatic tube current modulation and CM of Iohexol at 350mgI/mL concentration. Group A: 70kVp, noise index (NI) of 18 and CM dose rate of 17mgI/kg/s for 10 s for BMI <25kg/m2 patients; 80kVp, NI = 17, and CM dose rate of 19mgI/kg/s for 10 s for 25 kg/m2≤BMI≤30kg/m2 patients. Group B: 100kVp, 50 mL of CM at the flow rate of 4.5 mL/s. The objective image quality, effective radiation dose, CM dose, injection rate, and image quality were compared between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 groups (P > .05). Compared to group B, group A significantly reduced effective radiation dose by 28.4%, CM dose by 27.2%, and injection rate by 22.7% (all P < .001). The 2 groups had similar SD values in erector spine (P > .05). Group A had significantly higher CT values, SNR, and CNR values of the renal arteries than group B (all P < .001). The 2 radiologists had excellent agreement (Kappa value > 0.8) in the subjective scores of renal CTA images and showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (4.57 ± 0.42 vs 4.41 ± 0.49) (P > .05). BMI-based scan and reconstruction protocol in renal CTA significantly reduces radiation and contrast doses while maintaining diagnostic image quality. (i) BMI-based individualized tube voltage selection and contrast injection protocol in renal CTA reduces both radiation and contrast doses over conventional protocol. (ii) The combination of lower kVp and higher weight ASIR-V maybe used to improve image quality in terms of contrast enhancement and image noise under lower radiation and contrast dose conditions. (iii) Renal CTA of normal size (BMI ≤ 30kg/m2) patients acquired at low radiation dosage and low iodine contrast dose through the combination of low tube voltage and ASIR-V algorithm achieves excellent diagnostic image quality with a good inter-rater agreement.

Detection of Pulmonary Nodules on Ultra-low Dose Chest Computed Tomography With Deep-learning Image Reconstruction Algorithm.

To evaluate the accuracy of ultra-low dose (ULD) chest computed tomography (CT), with a radiation exposure equivalent to a 2-view chest x-ray, for pulmonary nodule detection using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR). This prospective cross-sectional study included 60 patients referred to our institution for assessment or follow-up of solid pulmonary nodules. All patients underwent low-dose (LD) and ULD chest CT within the same examination session. LD CT data were reconstructed using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V), whereas ULD CT data were reconstructed using DLIR and ASIR-V. ULD CT images were reviewed by 2 readers and LD CT images were reviewed by an experienced thoracic radiologist as the reference standard. Quantitative image quality analysis was performed, and the detectability of pulmonary nodules was assessed according to their size and location. The effective radiation dose for ULD CT and LD CT were 0.13±0.01 and 1.16±0.6mSv, respectively. Over the whole population, LD CT revealed 733 nodules. At ULD, DLIR images significantly exhibited better image quality than ASIR-V images. The overall sensitivity of DLIR reconstruction for the detection of solid pulmonary nodules from the ULD CT series was 93% and 82% for the 2 readers, with a good to excellent agreement with LD CT (ICC=0.82 and 0.66, respectively). The best sensitivities were observed in the middle lobe (97% and 85%, respectively). At ULD, DLIR reconstructions, with minimal radiation exposure that could facilitate large-scale screening, allow the detection of pulmonary nodules with high sensitivity in an unrestricted BMI population.

Assessment of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets type of manuscript: Original research.

To evaluate the quantitative and qualitative image quality using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) of pediatric cardiac computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional image reconstruction methods. Between January 2020 and December 2022, 109 pediatric cardiac CT scans were included in this study. The CT scans were reconstructed using an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V) with a blending factor of 80% and three levels of DLIR with TrueFidelity (low-, medium-, and high-strength settings). Quantitative image quality was measured using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The edge rise distance (ERD) and angle between 25% and 75% of the line density profile were drawn to evaluate sharpness. Qualitative image quality was assessed using visual grading analysis scores. A gradual improvement in the SNR and CNR was noted among the strength levels of the DLIR in sequence from low to high. Compared to ASiR-V, high-level DLIR showed significantly improved SNR and CNR (P<0.05). ERD decreased with increasing angle as the level of DLIR increased. High-level DLIR showed improved SNR and CNR compared to ASiR-V, with better sharpness on pediatric cardiac CT scans.

Multi-reader multiparametric DECT study evaluating different strengths of iterative and deep learning-based image reconstruction techniques.

To perform a multi-reader comparison of multiparametric dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images reconstructed with deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-of-care adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). This retrospective study included 100 patients undergoing portal venous phase abdominal CT on a rapid kVp switching DECT scanner. Six reconstructed DECT sets (ASIR-V and DLIR, each at three strengths) were generated. Each DECT set included 65 keV monoenergetic, iodine, and virtual unenhanced (VUE) images. Using a Likert scale, three radiologists performed qualitative assessments for image noise, contrast, small structure visibility, sharpness, artifact, and image preference. Quantitative assessment was performed by measuring attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). For the qualitative analysis, Gwet's AC2 estimates were used to assess agreement. DECT images reconstructed with DLIR yielded better qualitative scores than ASIR-V images except for artifacts, where both groups were comparable. DLIR-H images were rated higher than other reconstructions on all parameters (p-value < 0.05). On quantitative analysis, there was no significant difference in the attenuation values between ASIR-V and DLIR groups. DLIR images had higher CNR values for the liver and portal vein, and lower image noise, compared to ASIR-V images (p-value < 0.05). The subgroup analysis of patients with large body habitus (weight ≥ 90 kg) showed similar results to the study population. Inter-reader agreement was good-to-very good overall. Multiparametric post-processed DECT datasets reconstructed with DLIR were preferred over ASIR-V images with DLIR-H yielding the highest image quality scores. Deep-learning image reconstruction in dual-energy CT demonstrated significant benefits in qualitative and quantitative image metrics compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V. Dual-energy CT (DECT) images reconstructed using deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR)showed superior qualitative scores compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) reconstructed images, except for artifacts where both reconstructions were rated comparable. While there was no significant difference in attenuation values between ASIR-V and DLIR groups, DLIR images showed higher contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for liver and portal vein, and lower image noise (p value < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients with large body habitus (weight≥90 kg) yielded similar findings to the overall study population.

Deep learning image reconstruction generates thinner slice iodine maps with improved image quality to increase diagnostic acceptance and lesion conspicuity: a prospective study on abdominal dual-energy CT

BackgroundTo assess the improvement of image quality and diagnostic acceptance of thinner slice iodine maps enabled by deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT).MethodsThis study prospectively included 104 participants with 136 lesions. Four series of iodine maps were generated based on portal-venous scans of contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT: 5-mm and 1.25-mm using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (Asir-V) with 50% blending (AV-50), and 1.25-mm using DLIR with medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H). The iodine concentrations (IC) and their standard deviations of nine anatomical sites were measured, and the corresponding coefficient of variations (CV) were calculated. Noise-power-spectrum (NPS) and edge-rise-slope (ERS) were measured. Five radiologists rated image quality in terms of image noise, contrast, sharpness, texture, and small structure visibility, and evaluated overall diagnostic acceptability of images and lesion conspicuity.ResultsThe four reconstructions maintained the IC values unchanged in nine anatomical sites (all p > 0.999). Compared to 1.25-mm AV-50, 1.25-mm DLIR-M and DLIR-H significantly reduced CV values (all p < 0.001) and presented lower noise and noise peak (both p < 0.001). Compared to 5-mm AV-50, 1.25-mm images had higher ERS (all p < 0.001). The difference of the peak and average spatial frequency among the four reconstructions was relatively small but statistically significant (both p < 0.001). The 1.25-mm DLIR-M images were rated higher than the 5-mm and 1.25-mm AV-50 images for diagnostic acceptability and lesion conspicuity (all P < 0.001).ConclusionsDLIR may facilitate the thinner slice thickness iodine maps in abdominal DECT for improvement of image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity.

저선량 복부 CT검사에서 정량적인 지방 측정을 위한 딥러닝 알고리즘의 적용

As the obese population increases, computed tomography (CT) tests that can quantitatively measure abdominal obesity have been applied in various studies. To reduce the burden of radiation exposure in CT examinations, various image reconstruction methods such as filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) have been developed, and deep learning iterative reconstruction (DLIR) techniques combined with artificial intelligence have recently emerged. We applied FBP, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) at 30%, DLIR Low, Medium, and High - to low-dose CT images using only 20% of the standard abdominal examination protocols. We compared the measured fat area, total amount, and muscle mass, and evaluated them based on the images applying ASIR-V at 30% to the standard protocols. As a result of the study, the fat area and the amount of fat in the test group decreased by approximately 3~4% in VFA and VFV, and up to about 8% decreased in SFA and SFV in low-dose protocol images applying FBP and ASIR-V 30%. In addition, muscle mass also decreased by 3~6% in image reconstruction images, excluding DLIR. In the case of DLIR, there was either no difference in all items or a slight difference of less than 2%. Image reconstruction methods aimed at reducing noise may impact the results of follow up fat measurement tests. Therefore, the same inspection protocol and reconstruction methods should be applied for accurate evaluation.

Prospective evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction for Lung-RADS and automatic nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose chest CT.

To prospectively evaluate whether Lung-RADS classification and volumetric nodule assessment were feasible with ultralow-dose (ULD) chest CT scans with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR). The institutional review board approved this prospective study. This study included 40 patients (mean age, 66±12 years; 21 women). Participants sequentially underwent LDCT and ULDCT (CTDIvol, 0.96±0.15 mGy and 0.12±0.01 mGy) scans reconstructed with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V 50% (ASIR-V50) and DLIR. CT image quality was compared subjectively and objectively. The pulmonary nodules were assessed visually by two readers using the Lung-RADS 1.1 and automatically using a computerized assisted tool. DLIR provided a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio for LDCT and ULDCT images than ASIR-V50 (all P < .001). In general, DLIR showed superior subjective image quality for ULDCT images (P < .001) and comparable quality for LDCT images compared to ASIR-V50 (P = .01-1). The per-nodule sensitivities of observers for Lung-RADS category 3-4 nodules were 70.6-88.2% and 64.7-82.4% for DLIR-LDCT and DLIR-ULDCT images (P = 1) and categories were mostly concordant within observers. The per-nodule sensitivities of the computer-assisted detection for nodules ≥4 mm were 72.1% and 67.4% on DLIR-LDCT and ULDCT images (P = .50). The 95% limits of agreement for nodule volume differences between DLIR-LDCT and ULDCT images (-85.6 to 78.7 mm3) was similar to the within-scan nodule volume differences between DLIR- and ASIR-V50-LDCT images (-63.9 to 78.5 mm3), with volume differences smaller than 25% in 88.5% and 92.3% of nodules, respectively (P = .65). DLIR enabled comparable Lung-RADS and volumetric nodule assessments on ULDCT images to LDCT images.

Performance evaluation of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy spectral CT imaging: A phantom study.

To evaluate the performance of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in dual-energy spectral CT (DEsCT) as a function of radiation dose and image energy level, in comparison with filtered-back-projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithms. An ACR464 phantom was scanned with DEsCT at four dose levels (3.5 mGy, 5 mGy, 7.5 mGy, and 10 mGy). Virtual monochromatic images were reconstructed at five energy levels (40 keV, 50 keV, 68 keV, 74 keV, and 140 keV) using FBP, 50% and 100% ASIR-V, DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H) settings. The noise power spectrum (NPS), task-based transfer function (TTF) and detectability index (d') were computed and compared among reconstructions. NPS area and noise increased as keV decreased, with DLIR having slower increase than FBP and ASIR-V, and DLIR-H having the lowest values. DLIR had the best 40 keV/140 keV noise ratio at various energy levels, DLIR showed higher TTF (50%) than ASIR-V for all materials, especially for the soft tissue-like polystyrene insert, and DLIR-M and DLIR-H provided higher d' than DLIR-L, ASIR-V and FBP in all dose and energy levels. As keV increases, d' increased for acrylic insert, and d' of the 50 keV DLIR-M and DLIR-H images at 3.5 mGy (7.39 and 8.79, respectively) were higher than that (7.20) of the 50 keV ASIR-V50% images at 10 mGy. DLIR provides better noise containment for low keV images in DEsCT and higher TTF(50%) for the polystyrene insert over ASIR-V. DLIR-H has the lowest image noise and highest detectability in all dose and energy levels. DEsCT 50 keV images with DLIR-M and DLIR-H show potential for 65% dose reduction over ASIR-V50% withhigher d'.

Impacts of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V and Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Robustness of CT Radiomics Features: Opportunity for Minimizing Radiomics Variability Among Scans of Different Dose Levels.

This study aims to investigate the influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on CT radiomics feature robustness. A standardized phantom was scanned under single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) modes at standard and low (20 and 10mGy) dose levels. Images of SECT 120 kVp and corresponding DECT 120 kVp-like virtual monochromatic images were generated with filtered back-projection (FBP), ASIR-V at 40% (AV-40) and 100% (AV-100) blending levels, and DLIR algorithm at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H) strength levels. Ninety-four features were extracted via Pyradiomics. Reproducibility of features was calculated between standard and low dose levels, between reconstruction algorithms in reference to FBP images, and within scan mode, using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The average percentage of features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 between the two dose levels was 21.28% and 20.75% in AV-40 images, and 39.90% and 35.11% in AV-100 images, respectively, and increased from 15.43 to 45.22% and from 15.43 to 44.15% with an increasing strength level of DLIR. The average percentage of features with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90 in reference to FBP images was 26.07% and 25.80% in AV-40 images, and 18.88% and 18.62% in AV-100 images, respectively, and decreased from 27.93 to 17.82% and from 27.66 to 17.29% with an increasing strength level of DLIR. DLIR and ASIR-V algorithms showed low reproducibility in reference to FBP images, while the high-strength DLIR algorithm provides an opportunity for minimizing radiomics variability due to dose reduction.

An Evaluation Analysis for Computed Tomography Image Quality of Primary Liver Cancer Lesions Based on Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.

Abdominal multi-slice helical computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced scanning have been widely recognized clinically. The impact of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on the quality of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT imaging of primary liver cancer lesions was evaluated through comparison with the filtered back projection (FBP) and the new generation of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). We evaluated the image noise of the lesion, fine structures inside the lesion, and diagnostic confidence in 48 liver cancer subjects. The CT values of the solid part of the lesion and the adjacent normal liver tissue and the systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SD) values of the right paravertebral muscle were measured. The muscle SD value was considered as the background noise of the image, and the signal noise ratio (SNR) and contrast signal-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lesion and normal liver parenchyma were calculated. High consistency in the evaluation of image noise (Kappa = 0.717). The Kappa values for margin/pseudocapsule, fine structure within the lesion, and diagnostic confidence were 0.463, 0.527, and 0.625, respectively. Besides, the differences in SD, SNR and CNR data of reconstructed lesion images among the six groups were statistically significant. The contrast-enhanced CT image noise of DLIR-H in the portal venous phase is much lower than that of ASIR-V and FBP in primary liver cancer patients. In terms of the lesion structure display, the new reconstruction algorithm DLIR is superior.

Image Quality and Lesion Detection of Multiplanar Reconstruction Images Using Deep Learning: Comparison with Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction.

We assessed and compared the image quality of normal and pathologic structures as well as the image noise in chest computed tomography images using "adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V" (ASiR-V) or deep learning reconstruction "TrueFidelity". Forty consecutive patients with suspected lung disease were evaluated. The 1.25-mm axial images and 2.0-mm coronal multiplanar images were reconstructed under the following three conditions: (i) ASiR-V, lung kernel with 60% of ASiR-V; (ii) TF-M, standard kernel, image filter (Lung) with TrueFidelity at medium strength; and (iii) TF-H, standard kernel, image filter (Lung) with TrueFidelity at high strength. Two radiologists (readers) independently evaluated the image quality of anatomic structures using a scale ranging from 1 (best) to 5 (worst). In addition, readers ranked their image preference. Objective image noise was measured using a circular region of interest in the lung parenchyma. Subjective image quality scores, total scores for normal and abnormal structures, and lesion detection were compared using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. Objective image quality was compared using Student's paired t-test and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. The Bonferroni correction was applied to the P value, and significance was assumed only for values of P < 0.016. Both readers rated TF-M and TF-H images significantly better than ASiR-V images in terms of visualization of the centrilobular region in axial images. The preference score of TF-M and TF-H images for reader 1 were better than that of ASiR-V images, and the preference score of TF-H images for reader 2 were significantly better than that of ASiR-V and TF-M images. TF-M images showed significantly lower objective image noise than ASiR-V or TF-H images. TrueFidelity showed better image quality, especially in the centrilobular region, than ASiR-V in subjective and objective evaluations. In addition, the image texture preference for TrueFidelity was better than that for ASiR-V.

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm With Lung Enhancement Filter for Chest CT: Effect on Image Quality and Ground Glass Nodule Sharpness.

To assess the effect of a new lung enhancement filter combined with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm on image quality and ground-glass nodule (GGN) sharpness compared to hybrid iterative reconstruction or DLIR alone. Five artificial spherical GGNs with various densities (-250, -350, -450, -550, and -630 Hounsfield units) and 10 mm in diameter were placed in a thorax anthropomorphic phantom. Four scans at four different radiation dose levels were performed using a 256-slice CT (Revolution Apex CT, GE Healthcare). Each scan was reconstructed using three different reconstruction algorithms: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V at a level of 50% (AR50), Truefidelity (TF), which is a DLIR method, and TF with a lung enhancement filter (TF + Lu). Thus, 12 sets of reconstructed images were obtained and analyzed. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared among the three reconstruction algorithms. Nodule sharpness was compared among the three reconstruction algorithms using the full-width at half-maximum value. Furthermore, subjective image quality analysis was performed. AR50 demonstrated the highest level of noise, which was decreased by using TF + Lu and TF alone (P = 0.001). TF + Lu significantly improved nodule sharpness at all radiation doses compared to TF alone (P = 0.001). The nodule sharpness of TF + Lu was similar to that of AR50. Using TF alone resulted in the lowest nodule sharpness. Adding a lung enhancement filter to DLIR (TF + Lu) significantly improved the nodule sharpness compared to DLIR alone (TF). TF + Lu can be an effective reconstruction technique to enhance image quality and GGN evaluation in ultralow-dose chest CT scans.

Deep learning reconstruction vs standard reconstruction for abdominal CT: the influence of BMI.

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and lesion conspicuity of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm compared with standard image reconstruction algorithms on abdominal enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning with a wide range of body mass indexes (BMIs). A total of 112 participants who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans were divided into three groups according to BMIs: the 80-kVp group (BMI ≤ 23.9kg/m2), 100-kVp group (BMI 24-28.9kg/m2), and 120-kVp group (BMI ≥ 29kg/m2). All images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V of 50% level (IR), and DLIR at low, medium, and high levels (DL, DM, and DH, respectively). Subjective noise, artifact, overall image quality, and low- and high-contrast hepatic lesion conspicuity were all graded on a 5-point scale. The CT attenuation value (in HU), image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified and compared. DM and DH improved the qualitative and quantitative parameters compared with FBP and IR for all three BMI groups. DH had the lowest image noise and highest CNR value, while DM had the highest subjective overall image quality and low- and high-contrast lesion conspicuity scores for the three BMI groups. Based on the FBP, the improvement in image quality and lesion conspicuity of DM and DH images was greater in the 80-kVp group than in the 100-kVp and 120-kVp groups. For all BMIs, DLIR improves both image quality and hepatic lesion conspicuity, of which DM would be the best choice to balance both. The study suggests that utilizing DLIR, particularly at the medium level, can significantly enhance image quality and lesion visibility on abdominal CT scans across a wide range of BMIs. • DLIR improved the image quality and lesion conspicuity across a wide range of BMIs. • DLIR at medium level had the highest subjective parameters and lesion conspicuity scores among all reconstruction levels. • On the basis of the FBP, the 80-kVp group had improved image quality and lesion conspicuity more than the 100-kVp and 120-kVp groups.

The influence of image reconstruction methods on the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema with convolutional neural network.

This study investigated the influence of iterative reconstruction (IR) methods on computed tomography (CT) images when training convolutional neural network (CNN) models to diagnose pulmonary emphysema. To evaluate the influence of the IR algorithm on CNN, the present study comprised two steps: the comparison of noise reduction by IR algorithms using phantom examinations and the change in performance of CNN with IR algorithms using patient data. We retrospectively analyzed 97 patients. Raw CT data were reconstructed using the filtered back-projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) algorithms with blending levels of 30%, 50%, and 70%. The models were trained using reconstructed CT images and were named the FBP, ASIR-V30, ASIR-V50, and ASIR-V70 models. The mean and the standard deviation of the CT values were 11.3 ± 21.2 at FBP, 11.0 ± 17.3 at ASIR-V30, 11.0 ± 14.4 at ASIR-V50, and 11.0 ± 11.8 at ASIR-V70. For all the evaluation metrics, the best values were obtained with the FBP model applied to the ASIR-V70 test images. The worst values were obtained with the ASIR-V70 model applied to the FBP test images. The model trained with FBP images exhibited significantly better performance than the models trained using IR images. The reduction in image noise with the IR algorithm on the test images contributed to improving the accuracy of the classification of emphysema subtypes using CNN.

Effect of Low Tube Voltage (100 kV) Combined with ASIR-V on the Visualization and Image Quality of the Adamkiewicz Artery: A Comparison with 120 kV Protocol.

To evaluate the effect of low tube voltage (100 kV) combined with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) on the visualization and image quality of the Adamkiewicz artery (AKA). One hundred patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups (both n = 50). Group A (100 kV) was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and ASIR-V from 10% to 100% with 10% intervals. Group B (120 kV) was only reconstructed with FBP. The objective image quality was evaluated by using CT values of the aorta (CTAorta), background noise, signal-to-noise ratio of the descending aorta (SNRAorta), and contrast-to-noise ratio of the spinal cord (CNRSpinal cord). The subjective image quality and visualization scores of the AKA were assessed on a 5-point scale. CTAorta was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (p < 0.001). When ASIR-V weights were ≥60%, significant differences were found in the background noise, SNRAorta, and CNRSpinal cord between the two groups (all p < 0.05). In Group A, compared with FBP, the subjective score gradually increased as ASIR-V increased to 80%, which decreased when ASIR-V exceeded 80%. The visualization scores of the AKA (≥60%) and the ability to detect vessel continuity (≥80%) gradually increased as the ASIR-V weights increased (p < 0.05). The effective radiation dose was reduced by about 40.36% in Group A compared to Group B. compared with conventional scanning protocol, using a combination of low tube voltage (100 kV) and 80% ASIR-V protocol could not only increase the visualization of the AKA, but also improve image quality and reduce the radiation doses.

Improving image quality and resolution of coronary arteries in coronary computed tomography angiography by using high-definition scans and deep learning image reconstruction.

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been increasingly used to identify the degree of coronary artery stenosis and plaque lesions in vessels. This study evaluated the feasibility of using high-definition (HD) scanning with high-level deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H) to improve the image quality and spatial resolution when imaging calcified plaques and stents in coronary CTA as compared to the standard definition (SD) reconstruction mode with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). A total of 34 patients (age 63.3±10.9 years; 55.88% female) with calcified plaques and/or stents who underwent coronary CTA in HD-mode were included in this study. Images were reconstructed with SD-ASIR-V, HD-ASIR-V, and HD-DLIR-H. Subjective image quality with image noise and clarity of vessels, calcifications, and stented lumens was evaluated by 2 radiologists using a 5-point scale. The kappa (κ) test was used to analyze the interobserver agreement. Objective image quality with image noise, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was measured and compared. Image spatial resolution and beam-hardening artifacts (BHAs) were also evaluated using the calcification diameter and CT numbers in 3 points along the stented lumen (inside, at the proximal and distal ends just outside stent). There were 45 calcified plaques and 4 coronary stents. HD-DLIR-H images had the highest overall image quality score (4.50±0.63) with the lowest image noise (22.59±3.59 HU) and the highest SNR (18.30±4.88) and CNR (26.56±6.33), followed by SD-ASIR-V50% image quality score (4.06±2.49), image noise (35.02±8.09 HU), SNR (12.77±1.59), CNR(15.67±1.92) and HD-ASIR-V50% image quality score (3.90±0.64), image noise (57.7±12.03 HU), SNR (8.16±1.86), CNR (10.01±2.39). HD-DLIR-H images also had the smallest calcification diameter measurement (2.36±1.58 mm), followed by HD-ASIR-V50% (3.46±2.07 mm) and SD-ASIR-V50% (4.06±2.49 mm). HD-DLIR-H images had the closest CT value measurements for the 3 points along the stented lumen, indicating much less BHA. Interobserver agreement on the image quality assessment was good to excellent (HD-DLIR-H: κ value =0.783; HD-ASIR-V50%: κ value =0.789; SD-ASIR-V50%: κ value =0.671). Coronary CTA with HD scan mode and DLIR-H significantly improves the spatial resolution for displaying calcifications and in-stent lumens while simultaneously reducing image noise.

Evaluation of Image Quality and Detectability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in Single- and Dual-energy CT.

This study is aimed to evaluate effects of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on image quality in single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT), in reference to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). The Gammex 464 phantom was scanned in SECT and DECT modes at three dose levels (5, 10, and 20mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using six algorithms: filtered back-projection (FBP), ASIR-V at 40% (AV-40) and 100% (AV-100) strength, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H), to generate SECT 120kVp images and DECT 120kVp-like images. Objective image quality metrics were computed, including noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d'). Subjective image quality evaluation, including image noise, texture, sharpness, overall quality, and low- and high-contrast detectability, was performed by six readers. DLIR-H reduced overall noise magnitudes from FBP by 55.2% in a more balanced way of low and high frequency ranges comparing to AV-40, and improved the TTF values at 50% for acrylic inserts by average percentages of 18.32%. Comparing to SECT 20mGy AV-40 images, the DECT 10mGy DLIR-H images showed 20.90% and 7.75% improvement in d' for the small-object high-contrast and large-object low-contrast tasks, respectively. Subjective evaluation showed higher image quality and better detectability. At 50% of the radiation dose level, DECT with DLIR-H yields a gain in objective detectability index compared to full-dose AV-40 SECT images used in daily practice.

Improving lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT with deep learning image reconstruction: a prospective study with five readers.

To evaluate image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity in abdominal dual-energy CT (DECT) using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared to those using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (Asir-V) at 50% blending (AV-50), and to identify potential factors impacting lesion conspicuity. The portal-venous phase scans in abdominal DECT of 47 participants with 84 lesions were prospectively included. The raw data were reconstructed to virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 50keV using filtered back-projection (FBP), AV-50, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H). A noise power spectrum (NPS) was generated. CT number and standard deviation values of eight anatomical sites were measured. Signal-to-noise (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were calculated. Five radiologists assessed image quality in terms of image contrast, image noise, image sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability, and evaluated the lesion conspicuity. DLIR further reduced image noise (p < 0.001) compared to AV-50 while better preserved the average NPS frequency (p < 0.001). DLIR maintained CT number values (p > 0.99) and improved SNR and CNR values compared to AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H and DLIR-M showed higher ratings in all image quality analyses than AV-50 (p < 0.001). DLIR-H provided significantly better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M regardless of lesion size, relative CT attenuation to surrounding tissue, or clinical purpose (p < 0.05). DLIR-H could be safely recommended for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in daily contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to improve image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and lesion conspicuity. • DLIR is superior to AV-50 in noise reduction, with less shifts of the average spatial frequency of NPS towards low frequency, and larger improvements of NPS noise, noise peak, SNR, and CNR values. • DLIR-M and DLIR-H generate better image quality in terms of image contrast, noise, sharpness, artificial sensation, and diagnostic acceptability than AV-50, while DLIR-H provides better lesion conspicuity than AV-50 and DLIR-M. • DLIR-H could be safely recommended as a new standard for routine low-keV VMI reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT to provide better lesion conspicuity and better image quality than the standard AV-50.

The value of using a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm of thinner slice thickness to balance the image noise and spatial resolution in low-dose abdominal CT.

Traditional reconstruction techniques have certain limitations in balancing image quality and reducing radiation dose. The deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm opens the door to a new era of medical image reconstruction. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the DLIR images at 1.25 mm thickness in balancing image noise and spatial resolution in low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) in comparison with the conventional adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V at 40% strength (ASIR-V40%) at 5 and 1.25 mm. This retrospective study included 89 patients who underwent low-dose abdominal CT. Five sets of images were generated using ASIR-V40% at a 5 mm slice thickness and 1.25 mm (high-resolution) with DLIR at 1.25 mm using 3 strengths: low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H). Qualitative evaluation was performed for image noise, artifacts, and visualization of small structures, while quantitative evaluation was performed for standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and spatial resolution (defined as the edge rising slope). At 1.25 mm, DLIR-M and DLIR-H images had significantly lower noise (SD in fat: 14.29±3.37 and 9.65±3.44 HU, respectively), higher SNR for liver (3.70±0.78 and 5.64±1.20, respectively), and higher overall image quality (4.30±0.44 and 4.67±0.40, respectively) than did the respective values in ASIR-V40% images (20.60±4.04 HU, 2.60±0.63, and 3.77±0.43; all P values <0.05). Compared with the 5 mm ASIR-V40% images, the 1.25 mm DLIR-H images had lower noise (SD: 9.65±3.44 vs. 13.63±10.03 HU), higher SNR (5.64±1.20 vs. 4.69±1.28), and higher overall image quality scores (4.67±0.40 vs. 3.94±0.46) (all P values <0.001). In addition, DLIR-L, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H images had a significantly higher spatial resolution in terms of edge rising slope (59.66±21.46, 58.52±17.48, and 59.26±13.33, respectively, vs. 33.79±9.23) and significantly higher image quality scores in the visualization of fine structures (4.43±0.50, 4.41±0.49, and 4.38±0.49, respectively vs. 2.62±0.49) than did the 5 mm ASIR-V40 images. The 1.25 mm DLIR-M and DLIR-H images had significantly reduced image noise and improved SNR and overall image quality compared to the 1.25 mm ASIR-V40% images, and they had significantly improved the spatial resolution and visualization of fine structures compared to the 5 mm ASIR-V40% images. DLIR-H images had further reduced image noise compared with the 5 mm ASIR-V40% images, and DLIR-H was the most effective technique at balancing the image noise and spatial resolution in low-dose abdominal CT.