Adaptive Servo-ventilation Treatment Research Articles

Early sleep apnea treatment in stroke (eSATIS) - a multicentre, randomised controlled, rater-blinded, clinical trial: The association of post-stroke cognition with sleep-disordered breathing and its treatment.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is linked to cognitive dysfunction. Although SDB is common in stroke patients, the impact of SDB and its early treatment on cognitive functioning after stroke remains poorly investigated. Therefore, we explored the association between SDB and post-stroke cognitive functioning, including the impact of early SDB treatment with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) on cognitive recovery from acute event to 3 months post-stroke. We used data from two studies, which included ischaemic stroke patients (n = 131) and no-stroke controls (n = 37) without SDB (apnea-hypopnea index, AHI <5/h) and with SDB (AHI≥20/h). Cognitive functioning was assessed within 7 days and 3 months post-stroke in stroke patients, or at study inclusion in no-stroke control group, respectively. Stroke patients with SDB were randomized to ASV treatment (ASV+) or usual care (ASV-). Linear regression adjusted for main confounders assessed the impact of SDB and its treatment on cognitive recovery. The intention-to-treat analysis did not show significant associations of SDB ASV+ (n = 30) versus SDB ASV- (n = 29) with cognitive recovery. In an exploratory subanalysis, compliant SDB ASV+ (n = 14) versus SDB ASV- showed improvements with ASV in visual memory and cognitive flexibility. Combining the stroke and non-stroke datasets, SDB (n = 85) versus no-SDB (n = 83) was associated with deficits in visual memory and response inhibition independently of stroke. SDB ASV- versus no-SDB (n = 51) was associated with less improvement in visual memory. There was no substantial evidence for benefits of intention-to-treat ASV on cognitive recovery. Exploratory analysis indicated that compliant ASV treatment could benefit visual memory and cognitive flexibility, whereas untreated SDB could contribute to a poor recovery of visual memory.

Changes in cognitive function and daytime sleepiness in patients with chronic heart failure and Cheyne-Stokes respiration with adaptive servo ventilation treatment

Study objectivesCheyne - Stokes respiration (CSR) is prevalent in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Adaptive Servo Ventilation (ASV) alleviates CSR and improves objective sleep quality. We investigated the effects of ASV on neurocognitive function in the symptomatic phenotype of patients with CSR and CHF. MethodsThis case series included patients diagnosed with stable CHF (NYHA ≥ II) and CSR (N = 8). Sleep and neurocognitive function were assessed at baseline and after 1- and 6-months following initiation of ASV treatment. ResultsIn CHF patients (n = 8, median age 78.0[64.5–80.8] years and BMI 30.0[27.0–31.5] kg/m2, median ejection fraction 30[24–45]%, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score 11.5[9.0–15.0]), ASV markedly improved respiration during sleep (Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) 44.1[39.0–51.5]n/h at baseline, 6.3[2.4–9.7]n/h at 6 months treatment, respectively, p < 0.01). The 6-min-walk test distance increased by treatment from (295.0[178.8–385.0] m to 356.0[203.8–495.0] m (p = 0.05)). Sleep structure was modified, and Stage 3 increased markedly from 6.4[1.7–20.1] % to 20.8[14.2–25.3] %, p < 0.02). Sleep latency in the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test increased from 12.0[6.0–30.0] min to 26.3[12.0–30.0] min, (p = 0.04). In the Attention Network Test, evaluating neurocognition, the number of lapses decreased from 6.0[1.0–44.0] to 2.0[0.3–8.0], (p = 0.05) and the overall number of responses to a preset stimulus increased after treatment (p = 0.04). ConclusionsASV treatment in CHF patients with CSR may improve sleep quality, neurocognition and daytime performance.

Patient with Postputamen Hemorrhage and Sleep Apnea SyndromeWho Needed Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Treatment Following Exacerbationsof Well-Controlled CPAP Therapy

Patient with Postputamen Hemorrhage and Sleep Apnea SyndromeWho Needed Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Treatment Following Exacerbationsof Well-Controlled CPAP Therapy

Opioids and obstructive sleep apnea.

Freire C, Sennes LU, Polotsky VY. Opioids and obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(2):647-652.

Clinical Effect of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation on Left Atrial Pressure During Catheter Ablation in Sedated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Sedation during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation often provokes a decline in left atrial (LA) pressure (LAP) under atmospheric pressure and increases the risk of systemic air embolisms. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) on the LAP in sedated patients.Methods and Results:Fifty-one consecutive patients undergoing cryoballoon PVI were enrolled. All patients underwent sedation using propofol throughout the procedure. After the transseptal puncture and the insertion of a long sheath into the LA, the LAP was measured. Then, the ASV treatment was started, and the LAP was re-measured. The LAP before and after the ASV support was investigated. Before ASV, the LAP during the inspiratory phase was significantly smaller than that during the expiratory phase (4.9±5.4 mmHg vs. 14.0±5.2 mmHg, P<0.01). The lowest LAP was -2.2±5.1 mmHg and was under 0 mmHg in 37 (73%) patients. After the ASV, the LAP during the inspiratory phase significantly increased to 8.9±4.1 mmHg (P<0.01), and lowest LAP increased to 4.7±5.9 mmHg (P<0.01). The negative lowest LAP value became positive in 30/37 (81%) patients. There were no statistical differences regarding obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), obesity, gender, or other comorbidities between patients with and without a negative lowest LAP after ASV support. ASV is effective for increasing the LAP above 0 mmHg and might prevent air embolisms during PVI.

Effect of early sleep apnoea treatment with adaptive servo-ventilation in acute stroke patients on cerebral lesion evolution and neurological outcomes: study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled, rater-blinded, clinical trial (eSATIS: early Sleep Apnoea Treatment in Stroke)

BackgroundSleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent in acute ischaemic stroke and is associated with worse functional outcome and increased risk of recurrence. Recent meta-analyses suggest the possibility of beneficial effects of nocturnal ventilatory treatments (continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV)) in stroke patients with SDB. The evidence for a favourable effect of early SDB treatment in acute stroke patients remains, however, uncertain.MethodseSATIS is an open-label, multicentre (6 centres in 4 countries), interventional, randomized controlled trial in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and significant SDB. Primary outcome of the study is the impact of immediate SDB treatment with non-invasive ASV on infarct progression measured with magnetic resonance imaging in the first 3 months after stroke. Secondary outcomes are the effects of immediate SDB treatment vs non-treatment on clinical outcome (independence in daily functioning, new cardio-/cerebrovascular events including death, cognition) and physiological parameters (blood pressure, endothelial functioning/arterial stiffness). After respiratory polygraphy in the first night after stroke, patients are classified as having significant SDB (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) > 20/h) or no SDB (AHI < 5/h). Patients with significant SDB are randomized to treatment (ASV+ group) or no treatment (ASV− group) from the second night after stroke. In all patients, clinical, physiological and magnetic resonance imaging studies are performed between day 1 (visit 1) and days 4–7 (visit 4) and repeated at day 90 ± 7 (visit 6) after stroke.DiscussionThe trial will give information on the feasibility and efficacy of ASV treatment in patients with acute stroke and SDB and allows assessing the impact of SDB on stroke outcome. Diagnosing and treating SDB during the acute phase of stroke is not yet current medical practice. Evidence in favour of ASV treatment from a randomized multicentre trial may lead to a change in stroke care and to improved outcomes.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02554487, retrospectively registered on 16 September 2015 (actual study start date, 13 August 2015), and www.kofam.ch (SNCTP000001521).

Nocturnal hypoxemic burden during positive airway pressure treatment across different central sleep apnea etiologies

IntroductionNocturnal hypoxemia is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Here, we assess whether positive airway pressure by adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) reduces nocturnal hypoxemic burden in patients with primary central sleep apnea (primary CSA), or heart failure related central sleep apnea (CSA-HF) and treatment emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA). MethodsOvernight oximetry data from 328 consecutive patients who underwent ASV initiation between March 2010 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into three groups: primary CSA (n = 14), CSA-HF (n = 31), TECSA (n = 129). Apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and time spent below 90% SpO2 (T90) was measured. Additionally, T90 due to acute episodic desaturations (T90Desaturation) and due to non-specific and non-cyclic drifts of SpO2 (T90Non-specific) were assessed. ResultsASV reduced the AHI below 15/h in all groups. ASV treatment significantly shortened T90 in all three etiologies to a similar extent. T90Desaturation, but not T90Non-specific, was reduced by ASV across all three patient groups. AHI was identified as an independent modulator for ΔT90Desaturation upon ASV treatment (B (95% CI: −1.32 (−1.73; −0.91), p < 0.001), but not for ΔT90 or ΔT90Non-specific. Body mass index was one independent predictor of T90. ConclusionsAcross different central sleep apnea etiologies, ASV reduced AHI, but nocturnal hypoxemic burden remained high due to a non-specific component of T90 not related to episodic desaturation. Whether adjunct risk factor management such as weight-loss can further reduce T90 warrants further study.

Bioprofiles and mechanistic pathways associated with Cheyne-Stokes respiration: insights from the SERVE-HF trial.

The SERVE-HF trial included patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with sleep-disordered breathing, randomly assigned to treatment with Adaptive-Servo Ventilation (ASV) or control. The primary outcome was the first event of death from any cause, lifesaving cardiovascular intervention, or unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure. A subgroup analysis of the SERVE-HF trial suggested that patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) < 20% (low CSR) experienced a beneficial effect from ASV, whereas in patients with CSR ≥ 20% ASV might have been harmful. Identifying the proteomic signatures and the underlying mechanistic pathways expressed in patients with CSR could help generating hypothesis for future research. Using a large set of circulating protein-biomarkers (n = 276, available in 749 patients; 57% of the SERVE-HF population) we sought to investigate the proteins associated with CSR and to study the underlying mechanisms that these circulating proteins might represent. The mean age was 69 ± 10years and > 90% were male. Patients with CSR < 20% (n = 139) had less apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) events per hour and less oxygen desaturation. Patients with CSR < 20% might have experienced a beneficial effect of ASV treatment (primary outcome HR [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.34-0.88]; p = 0.012), whereas those with CSR ≥ 20% might have experienced a detrimental effect of ASV treatment (primary outcome HR [95% CI] = 1.39 [1.09-1.76]; p = 0.008); p for interaction = 0.001. Of the 276 studied biomarkers, 8 were associated with CSR (after adjustment and with a FDR1%-corrected p value). For example, higher PAR-1 and ITGB2 levels were associated with higher odds of having CSR < 20%, whereas higher LOX-1 levels were associated with higher odds of CSR ≥ 20%. Signalling, metabolic, haemostatic and immunologic pathways underlie the expression of these biomarkers. We identified proteomic signatures that may represent underlying mechanistic pathways associated with patterns of CSR in HFrEF. These hypothesis-generating findings require further investigation towards better understanding of CSR in HFrEF. PAR-1 proteinase-activated receptor 1, ADM adrenomedullin, HSP-27 heat shock protein-27, ITGB2 integrin beta 2, GLO1 glyoxalase 1, ENRAGE/S100A12 S100 calcium-binding protein A12, LOX-1 lectin-like LDL receptor 1, ADAM-TS13 disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member13 also known as von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease.

P3765Good adherence is important factor for adaptive servo-ventilation treatment for elderly patients with heart failure

P3765Good adherence is important factor for adaptive servo-ventilation treatment for elderly patients with heart failure

Adaptive servo-ventilation to treat central sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the BadOeynhausen prospective ASV registry.

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is highly prevalent in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-REF). The Bad Oeynhausen Adaptive Servo-ventilation (ASV) registry (NCT01657188) was designed to investigate whether treatment of CSA with ASV improved survival in HF-REF patients; the effects of ASV on symptoms and cardiopulmonary performance were also investigated. From January 2004 to October 2013, the registry prospectively enrolled HF-REF patients [NYHA class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45%] with moderate to severe predominant CSA [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/h]. ASV-treated patients were followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 24months, including natriuretic peptide concentrations, blood gas analyses, echocardiography, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing. 550 patients were included [age 67.7 ± 10 years, 90% male, 52% in NYHA class ≥ III, LVEF 29.9 ± 8%, AHI 35.4 ± 13.6/h, and time with nocturnal oxygen saturation < 90% (T < 90%) 58 ± 73min]; ASV was prescribed to 224 patients. Over a median follow-up of 6.6years, 109 (48.7%) ASV-treated patients and 191 (58.6%) controls died (adjusted Cox modelling hazard ratio of 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.24; p = 0.740); older age, lower LVEF, impaired renal function, low sodium concentration, and nocturnal hypoxemia were significant predictors of mortality. Patient reported NYHA functional class improved in the ASV group, but LVEF, CPX, 6MWD, natriuretic peptides and blood gases remained unchanged. Long-term ASV treatment of predominant CSA in HF-REF patients included in our registry had no statistically significant effect on survival. ASV improved HF symptoms, but had no significant effects on exercise capacity, LVEF, natriuretic peptide concentrations or blood gases during follow-up as compared to control patients.

Treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure impacts cardiac remodeling: Insights from the CAT-HF Trial

BackgroundSleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including central and obstructive sleep apnea, is a marker of poor prognosis in heart failure (HF) and may worsen cardiac dysfunction over time. Treatment of SDB with adaptive servoventilation (ASV) may reverse pathologic cardiac remodeling in HF patients. MethodsThe Cardiovascular Improvements with Minute Ventilation-targeted Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy in Heart Failure (CAT-HF) trial randomized patients with acute decompensated HF and confirmed SDB to either optimal medical therapy (OMT) or treatment with ASV and OMT. Patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved EF (HFpEF) were included. Echocardiograms, performed at baseline and 6 months, assessed cardiac size and function and evaluated cardiac remodeling over time. The CAT-HF trial was stopped early in response to the SERVE-HF trial, which found increased mortality among HFrEF patients with central sleep apnea treated with ASV. ResultsOf the 126 patients enrolled prior to trial cessation, 95 had both baseline and 6-month echocardiograms (77 HFrEF and 18 HFpEF). Among HFrEF patients, both treatment arms demonstrated a significant increase in EF: +4.3% in the ASV group (.0004) and +4.6% in OMT alone (P = .007) and a significant decrease in LV end-systolic volume index: −9.4 mL/m2 in the ASV group (P = .01) and −8.6 mL/m2 in OMT alone (P = .003). Reductions in left atrial (LA) volume and E/e’ were greater in the ASV arm, whereas patients receiving OMT alone demonstrated more improvement in right ventricular function. HFpEF patients treated with ASV also had a decrease in LA size that was greater than those receiving OMT alone. Although there were significant intragroup changes within the ASV + OMT and OMT-alone groups, there were no significant intergroup differences at 6 months. ConclusionsSignificant reverse LV remodeling was seen among HFrEF patients with SDB regardless of treatment allocation. Substantial reductions in LA volume among HFrEF and HFpEF patients receiving ASV suggest that ASV treatment may also improve diastolic function and warrant further investigation.

Adaptive servo-ventilation and sleep quality in treatment emergent central sleep apnea and central sleep apnea in patients with heart disease and preserved ejection fraction.

Reduced sleep quality is associated with impaired quality of life and increased mortality in patients with heart failure. The aim of this study was to observe changes in sleep fragmentation and sleep quality in patients with heart disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (pEF) treated with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy for treatment of emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) or central sleep apnea (CSA). 114 patients with structural heart disease and pEF introduced to ASV therapy between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into two groups; TECSA (n = 60) or CSA (n = 54). Changes of sleep fragmentation and sleep quality from baseline to ASV initiation were compared. ASV therapy leads to a significant reduction of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and arousal index in patients with TECSA and CSA (∆AHI: - 43 ± 21 vs. - 47 ± 22/h; ∆arousal index - 11 ± 15, vs. - 11 ± 21/h). ASV treatment leads to a significant increase in sleep efficiency in TECSA compared to CSA (∆SE: 10 ± 19 vs. 1 ± 18%, p = 0.019). Both groups had significantly longer stage N3 (N3) and rapid eye movement sleep (REM) on ASV (∆N3: 8 ± 11 vs. 9 ± 13%; ∆REM 7 ± 9 vs. 3 ± 8%; p < 0.05 for all comparisons baseline vs. ASV). In patients with heart disease and pEF, whose TECSA and CSA were treated with ASV, a significant reduction of AHI and arousal index as well as an increase of N3 and REM sleep was observed. Increase of sleep efficiency was significantly greater in TECSA compared to CSA. Hence, improvements of sleep quality were modestly greater in patients with TECSA compared to those with CSA.

Whom are we treating with adaptive servo-ventilation? A clinical post hoc analysis

Recent evidence has shown that adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is contraindicated in patients with predominant central sleep apnea (CSA) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤45%). The objective of this study was to assess the clinical usage of ASV in patients at the time-point of the release of a safety warning by type of SDB, breathing pattern and LVEF. Patients of a cardiac and a respirology sleep center, both in Germany, who received ASV therapy were contacted between May and October 2015. Retrospective analyses included diagnostic polysomnography, polysomnography with continuous positive airway pressure prior to ASV initiation and echocardiography. Treatment emergent CSA was diagnosed after an appropriate treatment period on CPAP. 285 patients receiving ASV therapy (91 in the cardiac and 194 in the respirology setting) underwent diagnostic polysomnography. 233 (82%) patients had severe SDB, 94 (33%) predominant CSA, and 185 (65%) periodic breathing. 20% (n=52) of patients had an LVEF of ≤45%. The most common indications for ASV were CSA in heart failure (41%) in the cardiac setting and treatment emergent CSA (80%) diagnosed after an appropriate period on CPAP in the respirology setting. The proportion of patients in whom ASV was contraindicated (CSA and LVEF ≤45%) was 16% in the cardiac setting and 9% in the respirology setting. Clinical usage of ASV changed for a small subgroup of patients after release of the SERVE-HF results. Nevertheless, ASV treatment should be monitored and evaluated with diligence in the reminder indications.

Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy reduces hospitalization rate in patients with severe heart failure

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy is a recently developed non-pharmacological therapy that has been reported to improve cardiac function and survival in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). However, a recent large randomized study suggested that ASV does not improve survival in patients with reduced ejection fraction. It remains unclear whether ASV treatment can reduce the hospitalization rate of CHF patients. We thus examined the frequency of hospital admission before and after initiation of ASV therapy in patients with CHF. Hospitalization frequencies during the 12months before and 12months after initiation of ASV therapy (24 consecutive months) were retrospectively compared in 44 consecutive patients with severe CHF. The admission frequency decreased from 1.9±1.4 admissions in the 12months before ASV to 1.1±1.6 admissions in the 12months after ASV initiation (P<0.001). The decrease tended to be greater in those patients with more frequent hospitalizations before ASV initiation. ASV therapy reduces hospital admissions in patients with severe CHF who are receiving maximum medical treatment.

Patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration and heart failure: patient tolerance after three-month discontinuation of treatment with adaptive servo-ventilation.

The recent SERVE HF study concluded that patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) have increased mortality when treated with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV). We, therefore, wanted to explore if these patients tolerated discontinuation of ASV treatment. The study was a prospective post-ASV treatment observational design with a 3-month follow-up period. 14 patients from our outpatient clinic, all male, were originally diagnosed with CHF and Cheyne-Stokes respiration, which is a clinical form of central sleep apnea. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was ≤45% when ASV treatment was initiated. Median machine use was 68 (42-78) months when the patients were instructed to terminate ASV treatment. The patients were then followed during conventional CHF treatment for 3 months. Study baseline was set the last ASV treatment day. Sleep data were collected from the machine the last day of use. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), LVEF, 6-min walk test and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram recordings were performed at baseline and at study end. Life quality data were obtained using The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionaire (MLHFQ). New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA) was registered. An ambulatory sleep screening was performed at study end. AHI increased significantly after 3 months without ASV treatment [from 1.6 (0.8-3.2) to 39.2 (24.3-44.1, p = 0.001)]. Quality of life (QOL) decreased significantly: 30 (13-54) at discontinuation of ASV vs. 46 (24-67) (MLHFQ) at study end, p = 0.04. Though there was no significant change in NYHA functional class, patients especially reported increased shortness of breath, reduced concentration and reduced memory after discontinuation of ASV treatment. There were no significant differences in LVEF, heart rhythm data and physical capacity. Left ventricular function was preserved indicating that discontinuation of ASV in heart failure patients does not affect cardiac capacity. There was a significant decrement in QOL that must be considered in further treatment of these patients.

A retrospective analysis of cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with ASV

Objectives. The effect of long-term adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) on cardiovascular mortality and admission rates in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and Cheyne–Stokes respiration (CSR) has not been much studied. The aim of this study was primarily to investigate whether ASV therapy significantly reduced these parameters. Design. We included 75 CHF patients on optimal medication and CSR ≥25% of sleeping time, in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II–IV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 45%. Thirty-one patients were treated with ASV for >3–18 months and 44 patients served as a control group. Results. Seven deaths (16%) in the control group and one death (3%) in the ASV treatment group had cardiovascular etiology. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding cardiovascular death (log rank p = 0.07; HR 0.18 (95% CI 0.02-1.44), p = 0.11) and combined cardiovascular death or readmissions, but there was a trend toward better outcome regarding cardiovascular event-free survival (log rank p = 0.06; HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.27–1.05). Conclusions. In CHF patients with CSR, 18 months ASV treatment did not significantly affect cardiovascular death or combined cardiovascular death or hospital admissions. But there was a trend toward better combined outcome.

Effects of adaptive servo-ventilation on ventricular arrhythmias in patients with stable congestive heart failure and sleep-disordered breathing

Congestive heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) are at an increased risk of nocturnal cardiac arrhythmias. SDB can be effectively treated with adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV). Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that ASV therapy reduces nocturnal arrhythmias and heart rate in patients with HFrEF and SDB. In a non-prespecified subanalysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN04353156), 20 consecutive patients with stable HFrEF (age 67 ± 9 years; left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF 32 ± 7 %) and SDB (apnea–hypopnea index, AHI 48 ± 20/h) were randomized to either an ASV therapy (n = 10) or an optimal medical treatment alone group (controls, n = 10). Polysomnography (PSG) with blinded centralized analysis and scoring was performed at baseline and at 12 weeks. The electrocardiograms (ECG) of the PSGs were analyzed with long-term (24-h) Holter ECG software (QRS-Card™ Cardiology Suite; Pulse Biomedical Inc., King of Prussia, PA, USA). There was a decrease in ventricular extrasystoles (VES) per hour of recording time in the ASV group compared to the control group (−8.1 ± 42.4 versus +9.8 ± 63.7/h, p = 0.356). ASV reduced the number of ventricular couplets and nonsustained ventricular tachycardias (nsVT) compared to the control group (−2.3 ± 6.9 versus +2.1 ± 12.7/h, p = 0.272 and −0.1 ± 0.5 versus +0.1 ± 1.1/h, p = 0.407, respectively). Mean nocturnal heart rate decreased in the ASV group compared to the controls (−2.0 ± 2.7 versus +3.9 ± 11.5/min, p = 0.169). The described changes were not significantly different between the groups. In HFrEF patients with SDB, ASV treatment may reduce nocturnal VES, couplets, nsVT, and mean nocturnal heart rate. The findings of the present pilot study underscore the need for further analyses in larger studies.

Adaptive servoventilation improves cardiac dysfunction and prognosis in heart failure patients with sleep-disordered breathing: a meta-analysis.

Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) is a new therapeutic modality to treat sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) especially for central sleep apnoea associated with Cheyne-Stokes respiration, whereas the role of ASV in SDB patients with heart failure (HF) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ASV on these patients through a meta-analysis of published data. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies focused on ASV through databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of science from 1950 to 2014. Parallel randomised controlled trials which compared ASV to other controls in HF and SDB patients with extractable data were meet our inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analysis models were applied using RevMan 5.2. Seven studies involving 301 patients were recruited in the meta-analysis. The weighted mean difference in apnoea hyponea index (-17.73 events/h, 95% CI, -21.85 to -2.94) and left ventricular ejection fraction (MD: 4.68, 95% CI, 2.74-6.63) both favored ASV compared to control conditions. The urinary noradrenaline level (MD: -32.18, 95%CI: -44.07 to -20.09) was decreased, while the exercise capacity measured by 6-min walk distance (MD: 41.26, 95% CI, 17.06-65.45) was improved after ASV treatment. Whereas neither left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) nor Epworth sleepiness-scale score (ESS) significantly changed after ASV therapy. ASV is superior to other therapy, as it can result in good consequences for patients with SDB and improve their prognosis in cardiac function. Further studies will still be needed to assess the benefit of it.

The effect of ASV (Adaptive Servo Ventilation) treatment for chronic heart failure in chronic kidney disease patients

The effect of ASV (Adaptive Servo Ventilation) treatment for chronic heart failure in chronic kidney disease patients

Three-Month Treatment with Adaptive Servoventilation Improves Cardiac Function and Physical Activity in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Cheyne-Stokes Respiration: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Cheyne-Stokes respiration frequently occurs in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) is a novel therapy with potential benefits. This prospective randomized trial investigated the effects of ASV on myocardial function and physical capacity. Methods: Patients with severe CHF, despite optimal cardiac medication and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and Cheyne-Stokes breathing for >25% of sleeping time were included. Fifty-one patients, age 57-81 years (4 were women), were randomized to either an ASV or a control group; 30 patients completed the study (15 from each group). The primary end point was any change in LVEF. The secondary end points were alterations in physical capacity according to the 6-min walk test or the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Results: In the ASV-treatment group, LVEF improved from baseline (32 ± 11%) to study end (36 ± 13%), p = 0.013. The 6-min walk test improved from 377 ± 115 to 430 ± 123 m (p = 0.014) and the NYHA class from 3.2 (3.0-3.0) to 2.0 (2.0-3.0) (p < 0.001). No changes occurred in the control group. Conclusion: Three months of ASV treatment improved LVEF and physical capacity in CHF patients with Cheyne-Stokes respiration. These results suggest that ASV may be a beneficial supplement to standard medication in these patients.