Adalimumab In Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Articles

The Efficacy, Safety, and Persistence of Therapy after Non-Medical Switching from an Originator Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-Life Experience from Two Tertiary Centres.

During the last two decades, an increased number of molecules with multiple mechanisms of action have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with a substantial increase in the costs related to therapy, which has become a concern for payers, regulators, and healthcare professionals. Biosimilars are biologic medical products that are highly structurally similar to their reference products; have no clinically meaningful differences in terms of immunogenicity, safety, or effectiveness; and are available at a lower price. Materials and Methods: This was an observational prospective study conducted in two IBD centres in Bucharest and included 53 patients, 27 male (M) and 26 female (F), diagnosed with IBD according to standard clinical, endoscopic, radiological, and histological criteria, who were non-medically switched at the indication of the National Insurance House to a biosimilar of Adalimumab. Aims: The aim was to determine the rates of clinical remission, adverse effects, and treatment persistence at one year. Results: No significant differences were found in terms of the faecal calprotectin (FC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels 6 and 12 months after changing from the originator biologic treatment to a biosimilar. Only one patient required a change in their biological treatment following the clinical and biological loss of response. The main adverse effect reported by the patients was pain at the injection site. Of the 53 patients, only 2 reported pain at the injection site, and 1 patient reported experiencing abdominal pain and rectal bleeding immediately after the switch, but no recurrence was observed clinically or endoscopically. Conclusions: This observational study is the first to be carried out in Romania that shows that, after a non-medical switch, biosimilars of Adalimumab are as efficient and safe as the originator Adalimumab in the clinical treatment of patients with IBD.

Safety profile and side effects of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease at a referral center in northeastern Brazil

Introduction: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents (Anti-TNF-alpha) are an effective treatment option in patients with moderate and severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objectives: To evaluate safety profile of infliximab (IFX) and adalilumab (ADA) in IBD patients over a 10-year period at a referral center in Northeastern Brazil. Methodology: The medical records of 123 patients, of whom 104 (84.5%) had Crohn’s disease and 19 (15.4%) had ulcerative colitis, were reviewed for side effects associated with the use of IFX (n=83) and ADA (n=40). Results: Thirty-one patients (25%) experienced side effects (IFX n=21; ADA n=10) (p=0.971), 15 (48%) of which were severe (IFX n=10; ADA n=5) (p=0.942). Acute reactions occurred in 9 patients (7.3%), infections in 13 (10%), malignancies in 3 (2,4%), psoriasis in 4 (3,2%), in addition to 3 deaths (2,4%). Conclusion: The frequency of side effects was similar for IFX and ADA. Both drugs are safe in the treatment of IBD, but careful screening and monitoring are necessary to identify and follow patients at risk of severe side effects.

Safety profile and side effects of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease at a referral center in northeastern Brazil

Introduction: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents (Anti-TNF-alpha) are an effective treatment option in patients with moderate and severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objectives: To evaluate safety profile of infliximab (IFX) and adalilumab (ADA) in IBD patients over a 10-year period at a referral center in Northeastern Brazil. Methodology: The medical records of 123 patients, of whom 104 (84.5%) had Crohn’s disease and 19 (15.4%) had ulcerative colitis, were reviewed for side effects associated with the use of IFX (n=83) and ADA (n=40). Results: Thirty-one patients (25%) experienced side effects (IFX n=21; ADA n=10) (p=0.971), 15 (48%) of which were severe (IFX n=10; ADA n=5) (p=0.942). Acute reactions occurred in 9 patients (7.3%), infections in 13 (10%), malignancies in 3 (2,4%), psoriasis in 4 (3,2%), in addition to 3 deaths (2,4%). Conclusion: The frequency of side effects was similar for IFX and ADA. Both drugs are safe in the treatment of IBD, but careful screening and monitoring are necessary to identify and follow patients at risk of severe side effects.

Patient preferences for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study from the GETAID.

Several adalimumab preparations are now available for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Comparative satisfaction and tolerability are unknown. This study investigated IBD patient satisfaction with approved adalimumab biosimilars and their originator. In this cross-sectional study, we included 941 consecutive adalimumab-treated patients with IBD across 45 centres affiliated with the Groupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du tube Digestif who completed a satisfaction questionnaire comprising four items each rated by a 10-point scale. The differences in responses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's honest significant difference test. The most commonly used drugs at inclusion were Humira® (436/941, 46.3%), Amgevita® (177/941, 18.8%) and Hulio® (105/941, 11.2%). The mean overall satisfaction rate with adalimumab was 8.5 (standard deviation 1.8). Overall satisfaction was significantly higher in patients treated with Humira (8.6 (1.5)), Hulio (8.6 (1.8)) or Amgevita (8.5 (1.4)) (p < 0.05). Satisfaction with the subcutaneous injection form was higher for patients treated with Yuflyma® (9.0 (1.4)), Humira (8.9 (1.3)) and Hulio (8.9 (1.7)) (p < 0.05). A total of 299 patients (31.8%) described injection site reactions. In all, 223 patients (23.7%) reported being previously treated with another adalimumab of which (32/223, 14.3%) discontinued treatment due to side effects. In this real-world setting, patients with IBD had a high level of satisfaction with adalimumab treatment, with some differences in terms of overall satisfaction and satisfaction with the injection device.

Immunomodulator comedication promotes the reversal of anti-drug antibody-mediated loss of response to anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

PurposeLoss of therapeutic response (LOR) due to anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to investigate whether immunomodulator comedication can reverse the immunogenic LOR to TNF inhibitors in IBD.MethodsIn this real-world retrospective cohort study, 123 IBD patients with neutralizing ADA to infliximab or adalimumab and concomitant subtherapeutic trough levels were screened for clinical LOR. Subsequent ADA and trough level measurements and clinical outcomes were analyzed for patients who received either immunomodulator comedication or dose intensification of infliximab or adalimumab to overcome LOR.ResultsFollowing immunogenic LOR, the initial anti-TNF regimen was optimized in 33 patients. In univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, immunomodulator comedication was identified as the crucial factor for regaining clinical remission and ADA clearance. Detectable trough levels (≥ 0.98 or ≥ 1.00 mg/L, respectively) had optimal predictive performance for both endpoints in receiver operating characteristics curves [area under the curve 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.68–1.00) for regaining clinical remission, 0.87 (0.71–1.00) for ADA clearance]. Furthermore, 11/20 patients (55%) on a comedication with azathioprine or methotrexate and 2/13 patients (15%) receiving anti-TNF dose intensification exclusively (P = 0.032) exhibited ADA elimination, regain of therapeutic trough levels, and clinical remission. Regain of clinical remission alone was achieved in 17/20 (85%) patients receiving comedication and 2/13 (15%) patients receiving anti-TNF dose intensification (P = 1.6 × 10−4).ConclusionImmunogenic LOR to infliximab or adalimumab in IBD can be successfully reversed using immunomodulator comedication.

Non-medical switch from the originator to biosimilar and between biosimilars of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease – a prospective, multicentre study

IntroductionClinical data on the efficacy and safety of non-medical switch between adalimumab(ADA) biosimilars are limited. AimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate medium-term clinical efficacy, drug sustainability and safety comparing non-medical switches from the originator to biosimilar ADA, and between ADA biosimilars. Methods276 consecutive patients on maintenance ADA therapy (n = 205 Crohn's disease, n = 71 ulcerative colitis) were included. Data on clinical efficacy, biomarkers and adverse events were collected at four time points: 8–12 weeks prior switch, at baseline/switch, 8–12 weeks and 20–24 weeks after switch. Drug survival was evaluated after a median 40(IQR:35–42) weeks follow-up. ResultsA total 174 patients underwent a non-medical switch from the originator to a biosimilar, and 102 patients had a biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch. No significant difference was found in clinical remission rates at any time point in patients switching from originator to biosimilar(87.3%/88.5%/86.5%/85.7%) or biosimilar to biosimilar(74.5%/78.4%/85.3%/79.8%). Mean C-reactive protein levels remained unchanged in both cohorts(p = 0.856 and p = 0.525). Drug survival was similar between the two cohorts with a probability of 91.6%(SE: 2.2) and 87.0%(SE:3.4) to stay on drug after 40 weeks(log-rank:0.96; p = 0.327). Five cases of injection related adverse events were reported. ConclusionClinical benefit was sustained following non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar, or between biosimilars in adalimumab treated IBD patients.

Drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease

Drug survival of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease

Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container

BackgroundAdherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is reported to be below par. Non-adherence may result in loss-of-response and increased hospitalization. We analyzed the effect of an electronic needle container (ENC) on adherence to adalimumab.MethodsIn this multicenter, 12-months observational study, we included adalimumab treated IBD patients. All patients were invited to receive an ENC. Patients who declined or did not complete the registration for an ENC served as controls. Primary endpoint was whether an ENC increased adherence, calculated from pharmacy refills as proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, including loss-of-response, identification of predictors of adherence and correlation between different modalities for measuring adherence. Loss-of-response was defined as a disease flare, dose-escalation or IBD-related hospitalization or surgery.ResultsThe pharmacies’ records identified 198 eligible patients, of whom 32 were excluded. The ENC was supplied to 69 patients, the remaining 97 patient formed the control group. Median baseline PDC (98.4% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.047) and the proportion of adherent (PDC ≥ 86%) patients (87.0% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.045) was higher for the ENC group. The ENC did not improve the adherence of patients during follow-up (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.55–2.86). During follow-up, five (7.2%) patients in the ENC group and 13 (13.4%) in the control group discontinued adalimumab (log-rank p = 0.22). Loss-of-response occurred in 12 (17.4%) and 14 (14.4%) patients, respectively (log-rank p = 0.66).ConclusionsOur results show no beneficial effect of a reminder-based intervention on adherence or treatment outcomes.

P045 Do Levels Matter? Maintaining Anti-TNF Class After Secondary Loss of Response to Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (Anti-TNF) biologic therapies have evolved as a mainstay of treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, 10%–20% of patients are primary non-responders to anti-TNF in clinical series and up to 40% of patients lose response to treatment over time. Current guidelines suggest that treatment failure in the setting of adequate drug concentrations are due to mechanistic failure and should be switched out of the anti-TNF class. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of switching to infliximab, rather than changing out of class, in patients with secondary loss of response to adalimumab who had a therapeutic drug level. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) treated with adalimumab within the University of North Carolina Inflammatory Bowel Disease clinic between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. Patients with a therapeutic adalimumab level and treatment failure and who were subsequently treated with infliximab were included in the study. RESULTS: There were a total of 16 patients with therapeutic adalimumab levels (&gt;5 μg/mL) and no antibody formation with treatment failure. In this population, 11 of the patients had CD, 3 patients had inflammatory bowel disease undifferentiated (IBDU) and 2 had UC. Ileocolonic CD (45.5%) and penetrating disease (54.4%) were the most common phenotypes. All patients had secondary loss of response to adalimumab and 87.5% had been increased to weekly dosing. Mean adalimumab level was 9.8 ± 6.8 μg/mL prior to switching to infliximab. Thirteen patients (81.3%) achieved clinical response with infliximab at 14 weeks and of the 8 patients with endoscopic assessments, 100% achieved endoscopic remission (5 with UC/IBDU and 3 with CD). There were a total of 6 patients in a sensitivity analysis assessing therapeutic levels &gt;7 μg/mL. All patients were female, however all other characteristics in this group were similar to those patients evaluated with a therapeutic threshold of 5 μg/mL, including the rate of clinical response at 14 weeks (83.3%). When compared to 28 patients with adalimumab levels &lt;5 μg/mL, there was no significant difference in clinical response at 14 weeks (P = 0.692). CONCLUSION(S): Switching within class to infliximab after secondary loss of response to adalimumab with a therapeutic level achieved clinical remission at 14 weeks in 81.3% of patients, and appears to be an acceptable strategy in selected patients. Therapeutic drug levels alone are not predictive of clinical response to a second anti-TNF.

Biosimilars of Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Are we Ready for that?

Biosimilars present a considerable potential to reduce costs related to clinical management allowing health-care providers to reinvest this money, leading to a wider access to an effective biological treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Infliximab biosimilars have already been incorporated in daily clinical practice and are currently used in all indications for which the reference product (RP) was approved. Areas covered: In the next few years, also adalimumab biosimilars will become available for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In fact, several of them (ABP501, BI 695501, GP2017, and SB5) have been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) with the same indications of the reference product (Humira ®). Initial preclinical data proved a strong similarity between all biosimilars and the RP. Moreover, phase 3 studies in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis showed no differences in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Data on IBD patients are urgently needed. Expert opinion: Biosimilars of adalimumab showed equivalent clinical efficacy to the RP in other immunemediated diseases. However, defining the ideal patient's profile to receive or to be switched to a biosimilar, choosing one biosimilar vs. another, or cross-switching among biosimilars, will become the next challenge in IBD.

P457 Influence of concomitant immunomodulators during maintenance therapy with Adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: looking for the ideal patient to use monotherapy

P457 Influence of concomitant immunomodulators during maintenance therapy with Adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: looking for the ideal patient to use monotherapy

Retention Rate, Persistence and Safety of Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Real-Life, 9-Year, Single-Center Experience in Italy

"Real-life" data of retention rate and persistence of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease are still limited. To analyze retention rate, persistence, and safety of adalimumab in a 9-year real-life cohort of inflammatory bowel disease patients. In this observational, retrospective single-center study, all adult patients treated with adalimumab as the first- and second-line biological treatment for steroid-dependent or refractory inflammatory bowel disease between March 2008 and March 2017 were included. Primary outcomes were persistence, retention rate, and adverse events; the secondary outcome was the identification of predictors of withdrawal. Ninety-six out of 181 patients (53%) withdrew their first course of adalimumab. The retention rate was 47% and 46.9% in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients, respectively; median persistence was 26 and 24months in CD and UC patients, respectively. The cumulative probability of treatment persistence was 80.2%, 54.5%, and 29.6% and 69.6%, 40.4%, and 21.5% in CD and UC patients, respectively. The incidence rate of any adverse event was 12.5/100 patients-year; severe adverse events were 1.7/100 patients-year. The Cox regression revealed that CD patients with baseline disease duration > 72months have a higher likelihood for withdrawal due to failure and/or adverse events (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1-2.62, p = 0.04); no predictors of discontinuation were found in UC. Adalimumab showed a great persistence in the first 12months of therapy and excellent safety profile. Early treatment of CD patients could increase efficacy and reduce the adverse event rate.

P535 The use of therapeutic drug monitoring for infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: Practice patterns, understanding and interpretation

P535 The use of therapeutic drug monitoring for infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease: Practice patterns, understanding and interpretation

P524 Active smoking and personal concerns about treatment can impair adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases: A prospective evaluation

P524 Active smoking and personal concerns about treatment can impair adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases: A prospective evaluation

Extrapolation and Interchangeability of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars have been approved by the FDA and European Medicines Agency and have already been introduced to the international market. Availability into the US market is imminent. Biosimilars are highly similar to the reference biologic product but should not be referred to as, nor equated with, generic medications as no two biosimilars can ever be identical. Regulatory pathways for biosimilar approval consider the totality of evidence for biosimilar approvals, but the preponderance of development relies on analytic and functional testing and allows extrapolation between indications to reduce the financial burden of completing comparative clinical trials for each indication. Neither CT-P13 (infliximab biosimilar) nor ABP 501 (adalimumab biosimilar) was clinically tested in patients with inflammatory bowel disease prior to being submitted for approval by regulatory agencies. The body of available evidence suggests that these drugs will perform similarly to their originators. The pathway for interchangeability of biosimilars has yet to be clarified by federal regulators and currently remains determined by states within the USA. However, preliminary data suggests that switching from originator to biosimilar is safe with minimal differences in clinical efficacy.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the magnitude of the association between pharmacokinetics of adalimumab and clinical response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A literature search was performed up to December 2013. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and meeting abstracts were reviewed. Studies were included if they analyzed the association of trough levels of adalimumab (TRA) or antibodies against adalimumab (AAA) with clinical response in adult or pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. A Mantel-Haenszel pooled risk estimate provided a measure of the association. Fourteen studies enrolling 1941 patients with inflammatory bowel disease were included in the systematic review. Thirteen studies analyzed clinical outcomes according to TRA. In only 1 study, there was no correlation between high TRA and clinical response. Six of the 7 studies reported a negative correlation between AAA and clinical outcomes. Six studies enrolling 536 patients (Crohn's disease [CD] only) met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for loss of clinical response to adalimumab in patients with CD (N = 4) with positive AAAs was 10.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.90-26.40, P < 0.0001). Patients with CD with TRA over a predefined cutoff were more likely to be in clinical remission with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.79-3.77, P < 0.0001). The association was stronger if the analysis was limited to the adult population (N = 3, OR: 7.05, 95% CI: 3.58-13.9, P < 0.0001). The presence of AAA is associated with a higher risk of loss of clinical response to adalimumab, whereas high TRA is associated with greater clinical response rates in CD. More data are needed in ulcerative colitis.

Development of an algorithm incorporating pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Several decision algorithms based on the measurement of infliximab (IFX) trough levels and antibodies to IFX have been proposed. Whether such algorithms can be extrapolated to the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab (ADA) has yet to be determined. A prospective study included all consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) having a disease flare while being on ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks were included. All patients were primary responders to ADA therapy and were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) naive. ADA trough levels and antibodies against ADA (AAA) were measured blinded to clinical data (Elisa LISA-Tracker, Theradiag). All patients were optimized with ADA 40 mg weekly. Four months later, in the absence of clinical remission (CR; Crohn's disease activity index <150 for Crohn's disease (CD), and Mayo score <2 for ulcerative colitis), patients were treated with IFX therapy. Patients were divided into three groups based on ADA trough levels and based on previous studies: group A, ADA>4.9 μg/ml; group B, ADA<4.9 μg/ml and undetectable levels of AAA (<10 ng/ml); and group C, ADA<4.9 μg/ml and AAA >10 ng/ml. A total of 82 patients were included (55% CD; mean age=43 years, disease duration=7.4 years, duration of ADA therapy=17 months). After optimization of ADA treatment, 29.2% of patients achieved CR in group A (N=41), 67% in group B (N=24), and 12% in group C (N=17; P<0.01 between groups A/B and B/C). C-reactive protein level at the time of relapse, disease duration, duration of ADA therapy, and IBD type was not predictive of CR after ADA optimization by univariate analysis. The response to ADA optimization was significantly more durable in group B (15 months) than in groups A and C (4 and 5 months, respectively). Fifty-two patients who failed following ADA optimization (63%) were treated with IFX, and 30.6% of them achieved CR. CR rates following IFX initiation were 6.9%, 25%, and 80% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.01 between groups C/A and between groups C/B). Duration of response to IFX was significantly higher in group C than in groups A and B (14 vs. 3 and 5 months, respectively, P<0.01). The presence of low ADA trough levels without AAA is strongly predictive of clinical response in 67% of cases after ADA optimization. Conversely, low ADA levels with detectable AAA are associated with ADA failure, and switching to IFX should be considered. ADA trough levels >4.9 μg/ml are associated with failure of two anti-TNF agents (ADA and IFX) in 90% of cases, and switching to another drug class should be considered.

866 Development of an Algorithm Incorporating Pharmacokinetics of Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

866 Development of an Algorithm Incorporating Pharmacokinetics of Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

DOP056 Development of an algorithm incorporating pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases

DOP056 Development of an algorithm incorporating pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel diseases