Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Research Articles

Abstract 4137925: Long-term Outcome of Initial Thoracic Endovascular Repair or Medical Therapy in Acute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: Real-world Data from a Nationwide Claims-Database in Japan.

Introduction: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the long-term morbidity of initial TEVAR compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) in acute uncomplicated TBAD (uTBAD). Objective: To evaluate real-world data(RWD) on the long-term outcome of Japanese patients with acute uTBAD using a nationwide claims database. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilizes JMDC, a nationwide claims database under Japan's universal healthcare system. We included patients who were initially hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute TBAD. We defined acute uTBAD by excluding those who died within one month, suffered aortic rupture, traumatic thoracic aortic injury, underwent open-chest surgery, experienced stroke or paralysis, or had less than six months of history in the JMDC. Patients who underwent TEVAR within three months of the index hospitalization (TEVAR group) were compared with those who received optimal medical therapy (OMT group). Propensity score (PS) matching was performed based on age, sex, and year of hospitalization. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we calculated the cumulative rate of all-cause mortality and aorta-related events. Results: Of 18,445 patients diagnosed with aortic disease between January 2005 and December 2020, 641 were included in the study (OMT group: n=580, TEVAR group: n=61). After PS-matching, demographics of the groups (OMT_PSM: n=183 vs. TEVAR_PSM: n=61) were female (12.6% vs. 13.1%), median age (54 years [IQR, 48-60] vs. 54 years [IQR, 50-61]) and follow-up time (18 months [8-32] vs. 19 months [9-32]), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves for the aortic-related events (Figure1, 2) are shown as long-term outcomes. Conclusions: This study successfully demonstrated that the estimated 5-year aortic-related event rate in acute uTBAD patients undergoing OMT is approximately 20%, demonstrating the relevance of the RWD source. However, the number of death events in the TEVAR and OMT groups was not sufficient to provide statistical power. Therefore, further studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term prognosis of initial TEVAR for uTBAD.

The prognostic impact of maximal aortic diameter on acute type B aortic dissection progression in a Chinese population

Currently, evidence concerning the link between maximal aortic diameter and in-hospital mortality in cases of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is insufficient. Thus, this study aimed to explore the relationship between the maximal aortic diameter at the time of admission and the early prognosis of patients diagnosed with ATBAD. A total of 678 patients with ATBAD were included between January 2016 and December 2018, during which their clinical data was gathered. The independent variable analyzed was the maximal diameter of the aorta, while the dependent variable was mortality during hospitalization. Factors considered in this analysis included the patients’ age, gender, body mass index (BMI), medical history of hypertension, stroke, diabetes, atherosclerosis, smoking habits, chronic kidney insufficiency, time until presentation, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, ejection fraction, presence of aortic regurgitation, symptoms, involvement of abdominal vessels, laboratory findings, and treatment approaches. Of these patients collected, the mean age was 56.03 ± 12.22 years, and approximately 82.45% of them were male. After analysis, it was found that the maximal aortic diameter of patients with ATBAD was positively correlated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.10). Surprisingly, a J curve relationship was detected between maximal aortic diameter (point 31 mm) and in-hospital death for patients with ATBAD. The effect sizes and confidence intervals of the right (maximal aortic diameter > 31 mm) and left (maximal aortic diameter ≤ 31 mm) aspects of the inflection point were 1.06 (1.02–1.11) and 1.03 (0.83–1.28), respectively. In addition, the stratified analysis showed a stable relationship between maximal aortic diameter and in-hospital mortality, while there was no significant difference in the interaction between different subgroups. In patients with ATBAD, a J-curve relationship was identified between the maximal aortic diameter and in-hospital mortality. Specifically, when the maximal aortic diameter exceeds 31 mm, a positive correlation with in-hospital death was observed.

Long-Term Outcomes of PETTICOAT Technique-Assisted Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for the Treatment of Acute and Subacute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection.

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment technique (PETTICOAT) for the treatment of acute and subacute complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinical data of patients with acute and subacute TBAD who were treated using the PETTICOAT technique at our center between March 2014 and March 2023. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were a composite of complications, such as entry flow, stent-graft-induced new entry (SINE), and re-intervention. The technical success was 92% (46/50). The perioperative mortality was 2% (1/50), and the procedure-related re-intervention was also 2% (1/50). The mean follow-up time was (74.9±33.9) months. The mortality was 4.1% (2/49). The incidence of aortic-related complications was 8.2% (4/49), including new entry flow, 2 retrograde type A aortic dissections, and 1 distal stent graft-induced new entry SINE. The procedure-related re-intervention rate was 4.1% (2/49). After 5 years of follow-up, the total aortic diameter at the renal artery level was reduced from that at the third year of follow-up but was still significantly larger than preoperatively (26.9±6.6 mm vs. 24.1±4.2 mm, p=0.013). While at the covered stent, bare stent, stentless, and celiac artery (CA) levels, the total aortic diameters did not change significantly compared with preoperative values, whereas true lumen (TL) diameters and TL ratios were maintained at obviously higher levels than preoperative. The rate of complete thrombosis of false lumen in the thoracic aortic segment was significantly higher than that in the abdominal aortic segment (79.6% vs 30.6%, p=0.0001). The results indicated that the PETTICOAT technique is safe and effective and could promote positive remodeling of the aorta from the level of the covered stent to the CA. Remodeling of the distal abdominal aorta may fluctuate and requires close follow-up review. The long-term results from our center suggest that the PETTICOAT technique promotes positive remodeling of the aorta from the level of the covered stent to the CA; whereas this advantage does not seem to be significant in the more distal segment of the abdominal aorta, mainly at the level of RA and distal. Therefore, further procedures may be required for aortic dissection of the abdominal segment. In addition, aortic remodeling may fluctuate to some extent during the follow-up period, especially in the abdominal visceral region, so close follow-up review is quite important, and prompt re-intervention is required if necessary.

Application of Antithrombotic Drugs in Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Underwent Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and necessity of antithrombotic drugs for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).The patients of acute TBAD treated with TEVAR were retrospectively enrolled from January 2007 to October 2022 in General Hospital of Northern Theater Command. The primary outcomes such as mortality and aortic adverse events [stroke, paraplegia, limb ischemia, organ failure (renal and intestinal tract), endoleak, redissection, aortic rupture, reintervention, and mortality] were recorded and evaluated at 1 month (early term) and 18 months (late term).The 697 patients of TBAD treated with TEVAR were divided into the antithrombotic (AT) group (n = 208) and nonantithrombotic (NAT) group (n = 489). The incidence of early mortality, early aortic adverse events, and the 18 months of cumulative freedom from all-cause mortality and aortic adverse events were not significantly different between the AT and NAT groups (2.4% versus 1.4%, 2.9% versus 4.5%, 94.7% versus 96.5% and 88.4% versus 89.9%, respectively). Log-rank tests also indicated that there were no significant differences. In multivariate Cox regression models, only pleural effusion, partially thrombosed of false lumen, maximum diameter of false lumen, and branch involvement were independent predictors of mortality, whereas the systolic blood pressure (SBP), pleural effusion, partially thrombosed of false lumen, true lumen compression, maximum diameter of false lumen, branch involvement were independent predictors of adverse aortic events.The antithrombotic drug for acute TBAD treated with TEVAR does not influence the mortality and aortic events in the early and late terms.

Structural reconstruction of mouse acute aortic dissection by intravenously administered human Muse cells without immunosuppression

BackgroundStanford type B-acute aortic dissection (type B-AAD) is often life-threatening without invasive surgery. Multilineage-differentiating stress enduring cell (Muse cells), which comprise several percent of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are endogenous pluripotent-like stem cells that selectively home to damaged tissue and replace damaged/apoptotic cells by in-vivo differentiation.MethodsMortality, aortic diameter expansion, cell localization, cell differentiation, and inflammation of the dissected aorta were evaluated in type B-AAD model mice intravenously injected with human-Muse cells, -elastin-knockdown (KD)-Muse cells, -human leukocyte antigen-G (HLA-G)-KD-Muse cells, or MSCs, all without immunosuppressant.ResultsHere, we show the Muse (50,000 cells) group has a lower incidence of aortic rupture and mortality of AAD compared with the MSC-50K (50,000 human-MSCs) and vehicle groups. Spectrum computed tomography in-vivo dynamics and 3-dimensional histologic analyses demonstrate that Muse cells more effectively home to the AAD tissue and survive for 8 weeks in the Muse group than in the MSC-750K (750,000 human-MSCs containing 50,000 Muse cells) group. Homing of Muse cells is impeded in the HLA-G-KD-Muse (50,000 cells) group. Differentiation of homed Muse cells into CD31(+) and alpha-smooth muscle actin (+) cells, production and reorganization of elastic fibers in the AAD tissue, and suppression of diameter expansion are greater in the Muse group than in the MSC-750K and elastin-KD-Muse (50,000 cells) groups.ConclusionsIntravenously administered Muse cells reconstruct the dissected aorta and improve mortality and diameter enlargement rates. Moreover, small doses of purified Muse cells are more effective than large doses of MSCs. HLA-G is suggested to contribute to the successful survival and homing of Muse cells.

STABILISE for acute type B aortic dissection.

Stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) is an extended downstream endovascular management technique for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), that aimed to achieve complete aortic remodeling. This systematic review aimed to assess the early and mid-term clinical outcomes with STABILISE in the management of TBAD. A literature search was performed on the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and SciELO databases, which returned 195 studies. Five studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms. In total, one hundred patients with acute or subacute TBAD managed with STABILISE were included. All studies reported a technical success of 100%. Thirty-day mortality was estimated at 4% (4/100) with no further deaths documented during an estimated mean follow-up of 12.7 months (range 12-15 months). Five percent developed spinal cord ischemia and another 5% developed visceral artery occlusions. One case of aortic rupture during time of balloon inflation was reported. Rare complications included delayed retrograde dissection (1%), aortobronchial fistula (1%), and renal failure (1%). One case of disconnection between stent-graft and bare stent was documented. Six percent of patients developed endoleak, predominately type I. Overall re-intervention rate was 21%, as reported in all studies. Complete obliteration of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was achieved in 99% of patients and in the abdominal aorta in 96% of patients. STABILISE technique carries promising early and mid-term outcomes with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity. Excellent results on complete false lumen obliteration were observed. However, the heterogeneity among available studies' methodology does not permit firm conclusions, and further prospective analyses are needed to study the long-term outcomes of STABILISE.

Long-Term Volumetric Evaluation of Stent-Assisted Balloon-Induced Intimal Disruption and Relamination of Aortic Dissection (STABILISE) in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

ObjectiveTo quantify the volumetric aortic remodeling of patients with acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) treated with the stent-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination (STABILISE) technique. MethodsAll patients with ATBAD operated with the STABILISE technique between 2014 and 2017 with pre-operative (PreOp), post-operative (PostOp) and >12 months (follow-up) computed tomography scans were included in this study. True lumen and total aortic volume were accurately assessed in the thoracic and abdominal portions with a semi-automatic 3D tool. Associations with long-term adverse events were estimated. ResultsSeventeen patients were measured at PreOp, PostOp and a mean follow-up of 19±8 months. The false lumen to total volume ratio decreased on average from 63% to 18% after STABILISE (p<0.001) and remained around 12% at follow-up. These remodeling was more pronounced in the thoracic aorta (7%) than in the abdominal aorta (28%). The trend in aortic size growth was stronger for volumes than for maximum areas or diameters (p<0.001, p<0.05 and p<0.05, respectively). Adverse events were identified in 4 patients during a long-term follow-up of 76±18 months. The only aortic size variable assessed preoperatively that was associated with undesirable events was the total volume of the abdominal aorta (p<0.05). ConclusionsA volumetric analysis of dissected aortic size after the STABILISE procedure allowed accurate quantification of mid-term aortic remodeling and helped to identify the abdominal aortic volume as a preoperative variable associated with undesirable long-term events.

Variability in the Treatment of High-Risk Type B Aortic Dissection at a Single Center

Although there are established high-risk features in acute Type B aortic dissection (TBAD), its management is variable. This study characterizes complicated, uncomplicated, and high-risk TBAD in addition to their management and outcomes to gain insight into the actual significance of these high-risk features and the reality of real-world practice in managing TBAD. A retrospective review of 62 patients was conducted. Patient demographics, management, and outcomes were characterized and evaluated with Pearson's χ 2 test, Fisher's exact test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Of the 32 high-risk TBADs, 66% (n=21) received endovascular repair, 31% (n=10) were medically managed, and 3% (n=1) received hybrid (open and endovascular) repair. Refractory hypertension and pain (52%, n=11) were the most common high-risk features in patients with high-risk TBAD that received endovascular repair. A maximum aortic diameter of > 40 mm (67%, n=6) was the most common high-risk feature in patients that received medical management. The most prevalent high-risk feature for all treatment groups in the high-risk TBADs was an aortic diameter of > 40 mm (n=16; 50%). Adverse post-operative outcomes were highest in the high-risk and complicated groups with endoleak as the most common adverse outcome (high-risk 12.9%, complicated 13.6%). Among the 62 patients, 47% (n=26) had follow-up since their admission with an average follow-up time of 69 ± 166 days. The significance of high-risk features in management of high-risk TBAD remains unclear. This single-center experience with managing acute TBAD reveals the reality of inadequate follow-up that may be specific to this disease process. This highlights a need to direct more efforts to assess long-term outcomes after treatment.

Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Experience Over 12 Years.

The treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is currently a challenge for vascular surgeons, because of the early morbidity and mortality rates and the high risk of late aortic events up to 50% at 5 years. This study presents the initial outcomes of ATBAD treatment using optimal medical therapy alone or combined with proximal entry tear stent-graft coverage. Additionally, it provides an analysis of the evolution of the aortic diameter and its clinical consequences during the chronic phase in each group. Conducted as a retrospective, single-center study, we enrolled all consecutive ATBAD patients (n=130) treated between 2008 and 2020. The primary analysis studies the entire patient cohort based on their initial management approach, namely, medical treatment alone for uncomplicated ATBAD (n=67) or combined with stent-graft entry tear coverage (n=63). We also conducted a subgroup analysis to investigate factors associated with disease progression in the medical management group. Median follow-up was 29.5 months. During this time aneurysmal evolution was observed in: 42.4% of cases in the medical group compared with 21.8% in the stent-graft group, primarily affecting the thoracic aorta. The stent-graft group exhibited significant aortic remodeling, with a decrease in false lumen (FL) and thoracic aortic diameters. Initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm and FL ≥22 mm were independent risk factors for aneurysmal degeneration. Five-year survival was consistent at 76.1% in both groups. This study confirms the safety and efficacy of stent-graft entry tear coverage for ATBAD. Initial thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) appears to reduce late aortic events by promoting aortic remodeling. Considering TEVAR's safety and potential to prevent late aortic complications, it may be considered for uncomplicated ATBAD patients with an initial aortic diameter ≥40 mm or an FL ≥22 mm. This study validates the efficacy and safety of using endovascular stent grafts to seal the proximal entry tear in cases of acute type B aortic dissections, compared to optimal medical therapy. Aortic remodelling significantly benefits from endovascular stent graft coverage of the proximal entry tear. Given the heightened risk of late aortic events observed in the medical therapy cohort, there appears to be a necessity for including endovascular interventions in the management of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections, particularly when aortic diameter is ≥40 mm and false lumen diameter is ≥22 mm.

Aortic mineralization triggers the risk of acute type B aortic dissection

Background and aimsThe role of aortic mineralization in the pathogenesis of acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is unclear. Whether thoracic aortic calcification (TAC) and circulating alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity are associated with acute TBAD risk remains elusive. MethodsObservational and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies were conducted sequentially. Using propensity score matching (1:1) by age and sex, patients with acute TBAD (n = 125) were compared with control patients (n = 125). Qualitative (score) and quantitative (volume) analyses of the TAC burden on different thoracic aortic segments were conducted using non-enhanced computed tomography. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify significant independent risk factors for TBAD and TAC burden, respectively. MR was finally used to determine the causal relationship between elevated ALP activity and TBAD risk. ResultsThe qualitative and quantitative analyses revealed that TAC burden was significantly higher in the TBAD group, except for in the ascending aortic segment (both p < 0.05). Preoperative circulating ALP was significantly elevated in the TBAD group (p < 0.001). The elevated TAC burden score on the descending thoracic aortic segment (odds ratio [OR] 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31–8.37) and increased ALP activity (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.06) was independently associated with TBAD risk. Interestingly, ALP was significantly positively associated with TAC burden, and MR analyses confirmed that ALP genetically predicted TBAD risk. ConclusionsElevated ALP may trigger TBAD risk via the increased volume of TAC. Aortic mineralization may not protect the aorta itself.

Acute Symptomatic Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection – Clinical Characteristics, Outcome, and Sex Differences

Acute isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD) is a rare condition and treatment recommendations are lacking. Most previous studies included both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aims were to determine the proportion of IAAD among patients with acute type B aortic dissection as well as to describe patient characteristics, radiological findings, and frequency of early and late complications and to explore sex differences. This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients hospitalized with acute symptomatic IAAD in Stockholm County during 2012-2021. A total of 277 patients with acute type B aortic dissection were identified, of whom 10% (n=28/277) had acute IAAD. Median age was 56years and 43% (n=12/28) were women. Hypertension was diagnosed in 46% (n=13/28) prior to admission. At onset, abdominal pain was the predominant complaint (93%, n=26/28) and 93% (n=26/28) were hypertensive on admission. The suprarenal aorta was involved in 39% (n=11/28) and at least 1 of the iliac arteries in 50% (n=14/28). All but 1 patient had uncomplicated IAAD (96%, n=27/28). One patient presented with aortic rupture, treated with open surgical repair. Among patients with primarily uncomplicated IAAD, 7% eventually developed chronic complications (n=2/27). Median maximum aortic diameter at 1-year follow-up was 21mm (interquartile range 17-28). Only 1 patient had an aortic diameter exceeding 30mm. None of the patients died during follow-up; median follow-up was 3.0years (interquartile range 2-8). Early and late complications are rare in patients with acute symptomatic IAAD and a conservative approach with antihypertensive treatment and surveillance in uncomplicated cases seems reasonable.

Spinal cord ischemia and reinterventions following thoracic endovascular repair for acute type B aortic dissections

ObjectiveThe technical aspects of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD), specifically the location of proximal seal zone (PSZ) (need to cover the left subclavian artery [LSA]), distal seal zone (DSZ) (length of aortic coverage), benefit of LSA revascularization, and prophylactic lumbar drainage are still debated. Each of these issues has potential benefits but also has known risks. This study aims to identify factors associated with reintervention and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) following TEVAR for acute TBAD with a zone 3 entry tear. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for TEVARs performed for acute TBAD with zone 3 entry tear, zone 3 proximal zone of disease, treated with TEVAR extending between zone 2 and zone 5. The primary outcomes were SCI and related reintervention. Secondary outcomes were stroke, arm ischemia, and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD). The exposure variables were PSZ 2 vs 3, DSZ 4 vs 5, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA revascularization. Univariate analyses were conducted with χ2 analysis, and multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate association with outcomes. ResultsOf 583 patients who met inclusion criteria, 266 had PSZ 2 and 317 had PSZ 3. On univariate analysis, PSZ 2 was associated with a higher rate of reintervention, but PSZ2 was not significant on multivariable analysis after accounting for age, sex, race, smoking, PSZ, DSZ, prophylactic lumbar drain, and LSA patency. PSZ 2 was not associated with SCI, arm ischemia, or RTAD. PSZ 2 was associated with a trend towards a higher rate of stroke. DSZ 4 and DSZ 5 were performed in 161 and 422 TEVARs, respectively, and DSZ 5 was associated with a higher rate of SCI on univariate (3 [1.9%] vs 39 [9.2%]; P = .01) and multivariable (odds ratio, 7.384; 95% confidence interval, 2.193-24.867; P = .001) analyses. Prophylactic lumbar drain placement was not statistically significantly associated with SCI, but lack of postoperative LSA patency was associated with SCI (odds ratio, 2.966; 95% confidence interval, 1.016-8.656; P = .05). ConclusionsThis study found that PSZ 2 was not associated with lower reinterventions or higher rates of SCI but trended towards a higher rate of stroke than PSZ 3. Additionally, DSZ 5 was strongly associated with SCI when compared with DSZ 4, highlighting the importance of limiting aortic coverage to coverage of the proximal entry tear when possible.

Outcomes of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection and High-Risk Features

BackgroundRecently the SVS and STS published contemporary guidelines clearly defining complicated vs uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections (TBADs) with an additional high-risk grouping. Few studies have evaluated outcomes associated with “high-risk” TBADs. The objective of this study was to assess differences in demographics, clinical presentation, symptom onset, and outcomes in high-risk patients that underwent either thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or best medical management for acute TBAD compared to those with complicated and uncomplicated acute TBAD. MethodsPatients admitted with acute TBADs from a single academic medical center from 10/ 2011 to 3/2020 were analyzed. Per STS/SVS 2020 guidelines, high-risk was defined as refractory pain/hypertension, bloody pleural effusion, aortic diameter >4cm, false lumen diameter >22mm, radiographic malperfusion, early readmission, and complicated was defined as ruptured/malperfusion presentation. Uncomplicated patients were those without malperfusion/rupture and without high-risk features. The primary end-point was inpatient mortality. Secondary end-points included complications, re-intervention and survival. ResultsOf 159 patients identified with acute TBAD, 63 (40%) met high-risk criteria. In the high-risk cohort, 38 (60%) underwent TEVAR (HR-TEVAR), with refractory pain as the most common indication, while 25 (40%) were managed medically (HR-Medical). Malperfusion or rupture was present in 63 (40%) patients (C-TBAD), all of whom underwent TEVAR. An additional 33 patients had no high-risk features and were all managed medically (U-TBAD). There were no differences in age, BMI, and race between groups. Among the four groups, there were variable distributions in sex, insurance status, and incidence of several baseline comorbidities including CHF, COPD, and renal dysfunction (p<0.05 for all). C-TBAD had increased length of stay (12, IQR 9-22) compared to HR-TEVAR (11.5, IQR 7-15), HR-Medical (6, IQR 5-8), and U-TBAD (7, IQR 5-10) (p<0.01). C-TBAD had decreased days from admission to repair (0, IQR 0,2) compared to HR-TEVAR (3.5, IQR 1-8) (p<0.01). C-TBAD patients had worse 3-year survival compared to other groups (log-rank p<0.01), although when in-hospital mortality was excluded, survival was similar among groups (p=0.37).Of patients initially managed medically, outpatient TEVAR was performed in 6 (24%) HR-Medical and 4 (12%) uncomplicated patients, with no difference between rate of intervention between groups (p=0.22). ConclusionsHigh-risk features, as defined in updated SVS/STS guidelines, are common in patients presenting with acute TBAD. High-risk patients had acceptable outcomes when managed either surgically or medically. High-risk patients that underwent TEVAR had improved perioperative outcomes and mortality compared to those undergoing TEVAR for complicated TBAD, a finding which may help guide preoperative risk stratification and patient counseling.

Elongation of the proximal descending thoracic aorta and associated hemodynamics increase the risk of acute type B aortic dissection.

Acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is a life-threatening aortic disease. However, little information is available on predicting and understanding of ATBAD. The study sought to explore the underlying mechanism of ATBAD by analyzing the morphological and hemodynamic characteristics related to aortic length. The length and tortuosity of the segment and the whole aorta in the ATBAD group (n= 163) and control group (n= 120) were measured. A fixed anatomic landmark from the distal of left subclavian artery (LSA) to the superior border of sixth thoracic vertebra was proposed as the proximal descending thoracic aorta (PDTA), and the dimensionless parameter, length ratio, was introduced to eliminate the individual differences. The significant morphological parameters were filtrated and the associations between parameters were investigated using statistical approaches. Furthermore, how aortic morphology influenced ATBAD was explored based on idealized aortic models and hemodynamic-related metrics. The PDTA length was significantly increased in the ATBAD group compared with the control group and had a strong positive correlation with the whole aortic length (r= 0.89). The length ratio (LR2) and tortuosity (T2) of PDTA in the ATBAD group were significantly increased (0.15 ± 0.02 vs 0.12 ± 0.02 and 1.73 ± 0.48 vs 1.50 ± 0.36; P< 0.001), and LR2 was positive correlation with T2 (r= 0.73). In receiver-operating curve analysis, the area under the curve was 0.835 for LR2 and 0.641 for T2. Low and oscillatory shear (LOS) was positive correlation with LR2, and the elevated LOS occurred in the distal of LSA. Elongation of PDTA is associated with ATBAD, and the length ratio is a novel predictor. Elongated PDTA induced more aggressive hemodynamic forces, and high LOS regions may correspond to the entry tear location. The synergy of the morphological variation and aggressive hemodynamics creates contributory conditions for ATBAD.

Readmission after thoracic endovascular aortic repair following blunt thoracic aortic injury.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly utilized to treat blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI), but post-discharge outcomes remain underexplored. We examined 90-day readmission in patients treated with TEVAR following BTAI. Adult patients discharged alive after TEVAR for BTAI in the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2016 and 2019 were included. Outcomes examined were 90-day non-elective readmission, primary readmission reasons, and 90-day mortality. As a complementary analysis, 90-day outcomes following TEVAR for BTAI were compared with those following TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD). We identified 2085 patients who underwent TEVAR for BTAI. The median age was 43years (IQR, 29-58), 65% of all patients had an ISS ≥ 25, and 13% were readmitted within 90days. The main primary causes for readmission were sepsis (8.8%), wound complications (6.7%), and neurological complications (6.5%). Two patients developed graft thrombosis as primary readmission reasons. Compared with acute TBAD patients, BTAI patients had a significantly lower rate of readmission within 90days (BTAI vs. TBAD; 13% vs. 29%; p < .001). We found a significant proportion of readmission in patients treated with TEVAR for BTAI. However, the 90-day readmission rate after TEVAR for BTAI was significantly lower compared with acute TBAD, and the common cause for readmission was not related to residual aortic disease or vascular devices. This represents an important distinction from other patient populations treated with TEVAR for acute vascular conditions. Elucidating differences between trauma-related TEVAR readmissions and non-traumatic indications better informs both the clinician and patients of expected post-discharge course. Level of evidence/study type: IV, Therapeutic/care management.

Value of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in predicting the development of preoperative oxygenation impairment in patients with Stanford type-B acute aortic dissection

ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the predicting value of C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio (CAR) in the development of Oxygenation impairment (OI) in the patients with Stanford type-B acute aortic dissection (AAD). MethodsThis study included 133 patients (age = 58.8 ± 12.0 years, median age = 61 years, Male/Female = 117/16) diagnosed as Stanford type-B AAD accompanied by hypertension from July 2012 to May 2020.Clinical data were retrospectively extracted from the database. The patients in this study were divided into OI group (oxygenation index ≤ 200) and non-OI group (oxygenation index > 200). Clinical characteristics in both groups were compared, and predicting value of CAR in the development of OI was assessed. ResultsPatients in OI group had higher peak body temperature (37.94 ± 0.62 vs. 37.67 ± 0.51 ℃, P =.010), higher levels of serum CRP (41.74 ± 27.71 vs 15.21 ± 19.66 mg/L, P =.000) and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (292.14 ± 251.11 vs 179.80 ± 241.27 ng/L, P =.016), lower levels of albumin (34.00 ± 5.14 vs 37.72 ± 5.24 g/L, P =.000), and higher CAR (1.27 ± 0.89 vs 0.41 ± 0.53, P =.000). In multivariate regression analysis, CAR (odds ratio: 5.215, 95 % CI: 2.682; 10.137, P =.000) and the peak body temperature (odds ratio: 2.905, 95 % CI: 1.255; 6.724, P =.013) could significantly predict the OI development. The AUC for CAR was 0.831 (95 % CI: 0.756–0.907). An optimal cutoff value for CAR for predicting OI was ≥ 0.70, with a sensitivity of 67.5 % and a specificity of 88.2 %. ConclusionsCompared with CRP or albumin alone, the CAR might be a more accurate marker in predicting OI development in Stanford type-B AAD.

Diameter changes of the thoracic aorta caused by acute type B aortic dissection.

The impact of type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD) on historical pre-TBAAD diameters of the thoracic aorta is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of changes in aortic diameters induced by dissection, measured with a computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before and after TBAAD. Between January 2004 and December 2014, CT angiography of 50 non-Marfan patients with nonbicuspid aortic valves diagnosed with TBAAD were compared to historical CTs on file. The ascending aorta and proximal arch showed negligible change. The proximal, mid, and distal aorta diameters changed compared with predissected values (107.7 ± 4.8%, 109.3 ± 4.9%, and 105.7 ± 5.8%, respectively). Neither sex, false lumen status, or mural calcification, nor prior thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia, correlated with the diameter change. Age ≥80 years in the proximal descending aorta did correlate with the diameter change (110.7 ± 4.0% vs 106.1 ± 4.6% p = 0.01). Although identifying predicting factors for an aortic diameter increase all along with the thoracic aorta was still challenging, the degree of diameter change by aortic dissection was 105.7% to 109.3% in descending thoracic aorta, most prominent in middle descending aorta.

Age-related difference in acute type B aortic dissection.

The objective is to compare the characteristics of clinical data, imaging data, and treatment methods of young and old patients with acute type B aortic dissection (ABAD). ABAD patients admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, such as gender, age, diabetes, hypertension, presenting symptoms, imaging characteristics, laboratory data on admission, hemodynamics on admission and in-hospital management, and mortality of different age groups were compared and analyzed. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. A total of 141 ABAD patients were included in this study. Old ABAD patients were more likely to have a prior history of hypertension (88.6% vs 70.4%, p = 0.037) and atherosclerosis (29.8% vs 7.4%, p = 0.016). In the young group, Marfan syndrome was significantly higher (14.8% vs 0.9%; p = 0.005). Compared with the old group, the number of distal tears in the young group was significantly higher (62.3% vs 39.5%, p = 0.027). The proportion of patients with malperfusion of lower limbs in the young group was significantly higher than that in the old group (22.2% vs 6.1%, p = 0.026). There was no significant difference in the treatment methods and in-hospital mortality between the two groups. Compared with old ABAD patients, young ABAD patients had more distal tears and a higher proportion of lower limbs malperfusion.

Early and mid-term results of endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections: A single tertiary center experience

Aim: The utility of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Type B Aortic dissections (TBAD) continues to advance at a growing rate. The purpose of this research was to investigate our management strategy and early-mid-term outcomes of endovascular procedures for TBAD, in a single tertiary center. Material and Methods: Sixty-six eligible TBAD patients (2 hyperacute complicated, 12 acute complicated and 52 uncomplicated) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 2016 and January 2023. The endpoints of the study were technical success, early and late morbidity and mortality, reinterventions throughout the follow-up period, as well as late open conversion. Results: Technical success was achieved in all cases. Early mortality was seen in only 3 patients (4.5%). Only patients with one hyperacute and two acute complicated TBAD (cTBAD) had early death. There was one late mortality in an acute cTBAD patient, who developed retrograde type A dissection two months after TEVAR. The median follow-up period was 26.1±13.7 months. Six reinterventions were performed for extension of dissection or covering the entries distally (9.1%). No endoleak, graft infection or migration were observed. Open surgical repair was performed; however, the patient did not survive. Conclusion: Early results of TEVAR in elective TBAD is trouble-free. Carrying the patients to the subacute phase seems to be the most suitable timing for TEVAR. Anti-stimulus and anti-hypertensive treatment with surveillance programme is mandatory for this patient cohort. Pre-emptive TEVAR has satisfactory results; however, long-term results are mandatory for further recommendations.

Short-term follow-up of proximal aorta remodeling after zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissection

BackgroundTo evaluate the early remodeling of the proximal aorta in patients with acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) after zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). MethodsFrom January 2016 to May 2022, 53 ATBAD patients underwent zone 2 TEVAR were divided into two groups, the Castor single-branched stent-graft (CSS) group (n = 26) and the common stent-graft group (n = 27). Three-dimensional imaging created by computed tomography angiography was used to measure different parameters of the aorta, such as angulation, cross-sectional area (CSA), length and tortuosity. Early remodeling of the proximal aorta was evaluated by comparing geometric parameters of the proximal aorta before and 3 months after surgery. ResultsIn terms of angle, the postoperative angle of aortic arch to ascending aorta, descending aorta increased in all patients compared with that before surgery (all P < 0.05), while the angle of aortic arch to left subclavian artery increased after surgery only in the CSS group (P < 0.001); As for CSA, the CSA of distal aortic arch and true lumen increased (all P < 0.05), while the CSA of false lumen decreased in both groups after operation (all P < 0.05); Only in CSS group, the CSA of the ascending aorta, proximal aortic arch and total descending thoracic aorta decreased after surgery (all P < 0.05); In terms of length, the aortic arch prolonged after operation in both groups (P = 0.018 and P = 0.004, respectively). In addition, the ascending aorta tortuosity decreased in the CSS group after surgery (P = 0.011). There was no significant difference in the alterations of other aortic parameters after operation (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe CSS implantation provided a more relatively safe and effective treatment for acute type B aortic dissection patients with unfavorable proximal landing zone. It can promote the earlier remodeling of the proximal aorta compared with the common stent-graft implantation after zone 2 TEVAR.