Acute Postoperative Pain Research Articles

Measurement of acute postoperative pain intensity in orthopedic trials: a qualitative concept elicitation study.

Pain intensity is an important outcome in clinical trials of surgery because pain relief is important to patients. Currently, recommended scales are the numeric rating scale 0-10 and visual analogue scale. However, these scales allow for considerable influence of individual imagination, previous experience, and coping skills, limiting proficiency in comparative clinical trials. We aimed to explore postoperative expressions of "how much it hurts"-the first step to improve pain intensity measurement. This was a qualitative study using inductive content analysis: words and visual cues describing pain intensity were collected from (i) existing pain intensity measures by search of COSMIN, PubMed, and Google, (ii) patient interviews recorded and transcribed word-for-word, (iii) clinician interviews transcribed likewise, and (iv) 100 patient telephone interviews with notes taken. After familiarization, the collected expressions were labelled inductively in categories and assembled in tables (case and theme-based matrices). Descriptors fell into 12 categories: intensity (slight/strong), evaluative (negligible/unbearable), cognitive impact (distracting/can be ignored), activity impact (limits some/all activity), sleep impact (can/cannot sleep), examples (like stubbing a toe), physical signs (crying/writhing), associated symptoms (nauseating/tiring), treatment (ice helps/need morphine), affective (annoying/dreadful), discriminative (aching/piercing), and general recovery (hindering recovery/functional interference). Many visual cues were also identified. Literature and recorded interviews gave rise to the categories, and telephone interviews found saturation, providing no further categories. Pain intensity is expressed by terms that fall into 12 categories and by a variety of graphic elements. This advances development of a patient-reported outcome measure of pain intensity for orthopedic trials.

The Impact of Depression and Anxiety Comorbidities on Acute Postoperative Pain After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Depression and anxiety have a complex association with opioid dependence, though their impact on acute postoperative pain is unclear. The present study investigated the impact of depression and anxiety on acute postoperative pain and opioid requirements following deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. Patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction were retrospectively identified from 2019 to 2023. Patients were classified into the psychiatric comorbidity (PC) group based on a history of depression or anxiety diagnoses, or the control group. Pain (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) scores and cumulative inpatient opioid requirements (in morphine milli-equivalents [MMEs]) were compared between groups. Linear regression analysis assessed the association of psychiatric comorbidities with pain outcomes. In total, 557 patients were included, of which 11.4% reported a psychiatric history. The PC group was younger (50.0 vs. 52.7 years, p = 0.032) and more frequently reported current marijuana use (15.6% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.001) and former smoking (51.6% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001). The PC group had higher mean (2.5 vs. 2.0, p < 0.001) and maximum pain scores (8.6 vs. 7.8, p = 0.003) than the control group, which corresponded to higher opioid requirements (256 vs. 223 MMEs, p = 0.041). Psychiatric comorbidities were associated with higher average and maximum pain scores (p < 0.01) while current marijuana use was associated with higher opioid requirements (p = 0.033). Patients with depression or anxiety comorbidities tended to have greater acute postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Marijuana use was also more prevalent, potentially exacerbating pain outcomes, and risk of opioid dependence. These findings will inform patient discussions and targeted interventions to mitigate opioid misuse.

Effect of individualized anesthesia and analgesia on postoperative pain in patients stratified for pain sensitivity: A study protocol for the PeriOPerative individualization trial randomized controlled trial.

Despite advancements in surgical and anesthesia techniques, acute and persistent postoperative pain are still a common challenge. Postoperative pain has direct effects on individual patient care and outcome, as well as putting strain on limited health care resources. Several prediction methods for postoperative pain have been described. One such method is the assessment of pain during peripheral venous cannulation (VCP). It is not known if different approaches to anesthesia and analgesia, depending on the evaluation of risk for postoperative pain, can improve outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate if individualized anesthesia and analgesia can affect postoperative pain and recovery after surgery, in patients stratified by VCP. Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery undergo pain-sensitivity stratification using VCP on the day of surgery. Patients scoring VCP ≥2.0 on the visual analogue scale (pain-sensitive) are randomized to multimodal anaesthesia and analgesia with opioids or standard of care. Patients scoring VCP ≤1.9 (pain-tolerant) are randomized to opioid-free anaesthesia or standard of care. The primary outcome is acute postoperative pain measured with numeric rating scale in the postoperative care unit. Secondary outcomes include analysis of pain after 24 h, persistent postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Individualized perioperative pain management has the potential to improve patient care. This study will examine the impact of different anesthesia and analgesia regimes, in patients with differing pain sensitivity, on postoperative pain. Prospectively posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04751812.

Incidence and risk factors of chronic post-thoracic surgery pain: A retrospective study

BackgroundChronic post-thoracic surgery pain (CPTSP) is a common complication that affects a patient’s quality of life. Thoracotomy is associated with a high risk of chronic pain. Video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) is a less traumatic option, but its role in the development of CPTSP is unclear. Regardless of the approach, there is evidence that demographic, psychosocial, or clinical factors also contribute to pain. The primary objective of this study is to determine the incidence of CPTSP in our hospital. The secondary objective is to identify possible risk factors related to CPTSP. MethodRetrospective, single-centre observational study. The medical records of patients that underwent thoracic surgery between January 2016 and January 2020 were reviewed. The diagnosis of CPTSP was made by reviewing the postoperative visits 6 months after surgery. We analysed the relationship between CPTSP and a series of variables, and then constructed a multivariate binary logistic regression model with a significance level of p < 0.05 ResultsA total of 259 patients were analyzedanalysed, 46.7% underwent VATS and 53.3% underwent thoracotomy. The overall incidence of CPTSP was 12%; 4.1% in VATS and 18.8% in thoracotomies. The multivariate model revealed that acute postoperative pain severe and a greater number of chest tubes were risk factors for CPTSP ConclusionThe incidence of CPTSP was 12% in our hospital. Patients with higher acute postoperative pain severe and several chest tubes were more likely to develop CPTSP.

Postoperative acute pain trajectories in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing hysterectomy

Postoperative acute pain trajectories in gynecologic cancer patients undergoing hysterectomy

COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT DOSES OF ORAL GABAPENTIN FOR POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN LOWER LIMB SURGERY UNDER SPINAL ANAESTHESIA

Background: Pre-emptive analgesia is a technique of pain control where treatment is initiated before intervention and operational during the surgical procedure in order to reduce the physiological consequences of nociceptive transmission provoked by the procedure. Gabapentin has demonstrated analgesic effects in clinical trials as a preemptive analgesic in acute postoperative pain management with very few side effects. Owing to the protective effect of gabapentin on the nociceptive pathways, preemptive analgesia has the potential to be more effective and hence reduce postoperative pain and development of chronic pain. Objective: We therefore designed this study to compare two different doses of Oral Gabapentin (300mg and 600mg) given as pre-emptive analgesic for post-operative pain relief in lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Method: After the approval from ethical committee this prospective randomized double blinded clinical study was conducted over a period of two years in department of anaesthesia in M.G.M.s medical college, Aurangabad. Randomly allocated two groups were given Oral Gabapentin 300mg and 600mg respectively, one hour prior to giving spinal anaesthesia for post operative analgesia in lower limb surgeries. Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference between group G300 (gabapentin 300mg) and group G600 (gabapentin 600mg) regarding age, gender, duration of analgesia (i.e. demand for first rescue analgesic), total dose of analgesics in first twenty four hours after surgery, duration of sensory block (i.e. L1 regression), highest ramsay sedation score and VAS scores. No significant difference was seen in cases hemodynamic stability and incidence of side effects.

Use of opioids and opioid alternatives during general anesthesia: a pan-Canadian survey among anesthesiologists.

While there is limited patient-centred evidence (i.e., evidence that is important for patients and end-users) to inform the use of pharmacologic opioid minimization strategies (i.e., the use of opioid alternatives) for adult surgical patients requiring general anesthesia, such strategies are increasingly being adopted into practice. Our objectives were to describe anesthesiologists' beliefs regarding intraoperative opioid minimizing strategies use and utility, and to explore important clinical decision-making factors. We conducted a pan-Canadian web-based survey of anesthesiologists that was distributed using a modified Dillman technique. Our multidisciplinary team, including a patientpartners panel, participated in the process of domains and items generation, items reduction, formatting, and composition. Our sampling frames were members of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society and members of the Association des Anesthésiologistes du Québec. We used the newsletters of each organization to distribute our survey, which was available in English and French and housed on the LimeSurvey (LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) platform. From our eligible sampling frame, 18% completed the survey (356 respondents out of 2,008 eligible participants). Most of the respondents believed that using opioid minimization strategies during general anesthesia could improve postoperative clinical outcomes, including pain control (84% agree or strongly agree, n = 344/409). Reported use of pharmacologic opioid minimization strategies was variable; however, most respondents believed that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists (ketamine), α2-adrenoceptor agonists (dexmedetomidine), corticosteroids, and intravenous lidocaine improve prostoperative clinical outcomes. The primary factors guiding decision-making regarding the use of opioid minimization strategies were postoperative acute pain intensity, the impact of acute pain on functioning, patient well-being (i.e., quality of recovery) and patient satisfaction with care. A lack of evidence was the most important barrier limiting the use of opioid minimization strategies. In our survey of Canadian anesthesiologists, several opioid minimization strategies were believed to be effective complements to general anesthesia, although there was substantial variation in their reported use. Future randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of opioid minimization strategies should prioritize patient-centred outcome measures assessment such as the quality of recovery or the impact ofacute pain on functioning.

The Relationship Between Tramadol Use and Cardio Electrophysiological Balance for Postoperative Pain Treatment in General Surgery Patients

Background and Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between tramadol use and cardio electrophysiological imbalance (iCEB/iCEBc) in general surgery patients with complaints of acute postoperative pain (APP). Materials and Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, a total of 218 consecutive patients over the age of 18, who underwent surgical procedures in our clinic (postoperative), were included. For analgesic effect, tramadol was administered with an initial total max dose not exceeding 2 mg/kg. A single max dose (100 mg) was given intravenously, infused in 100 cc of saline over 60 min. In all patients requiring analgesia, electrocardiography (ECG) was performed in the supine position with 12 leads at 25 mm/s and 10 mm/mV, immediately before and after tramadol administration. iCEB was calculated as QT/QRS and iCEBc as QTc/QRS. Results: A total of 218 patients were included in this study, with 98 of them being male (45%) and the average age being 46.20 ± 17.19 years. The average tramadol dose for analgesic effect was 98.21 ± 7.62 mg. The QT interval (339.17 ± 36.27 vs. 349.88 ± 30.86, p = 0.001), QTc interval (407.07 ± 26.36 vs. 419.64 ± 31.78, p &lt; 0.001), QRS duration (80.82 ± 11.39 vs. 78.57 ± 9.80, p = 0.018), iCEB (4.26 ± 0.69 vs. 4.52 ± 0.70, p &lt; 0.001), and iCEBc (5.14 ± 0.86 vs. 5.42 ± 0.79, p = 0.001) values significantly increased compared to the baseline immediately after drug administration. Furthermore, the drug dose was identified as an independent predictor that increased iCEBc (β = 0.201, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Even at single and therapeutic doses, tramadol increases iCEB and iCEBc. Additionally, the drug dose is an independent predictor of increased iCEBc.

Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study

BackgroundPain, as defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain, is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling, that is associated with actual or potential tissue damage. In Ethiopia, where healthcare facilities and offerings are expanding to handle countless patients requiring surgical intervention, managing acute postoperative pain is a serious concern. ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence of acute postoperative pain and associated factors after elective surgery among adult patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023 MethodologyThis is an institution-based cross-sectional study. A structured data collection format was used to collect data from 219 participants. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses described the association between independent and dependent variables. ResultsOf 219 patients, 180 (82.2 %) had acute postoperative pain. The prevalence of moderate to severe pain was 34.24 %. Preoperative anxiety, the use of intraoperative analgesics, and duration of surgery were the main factors associated with the prevalence of acute postoperative pain. ConclusionOur study revealed that the overall prevalence of postoperative pain was relatively low in the study area. This suggests that the attention given to postoperative pain recognition and management is better than that in other areas. However, the finding of a significant gap in managing postoperative pain underscores the need for further improvements in pain management practices. This should motivate us to commit to change, particularly in the identified areas of concern, such as preoperative anxiety, use of intraoperative analgesics, and duration of surgery.

Postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy: A comparison between total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia

Objective: Propofol is more effective than inhalational anesthesia; however, the results for the management of acute pain remain controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence of acute pain after inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia among patients who underwent thoracotomy at our hospital. Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective observational study using data from electronic medical records. Sixty patients aged ≥20 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II who underwent regular and emergency thoracotomy between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, at Chungbuk National University Hospital were included in this study. The anesthesia and postoperative pain records of those who received total intravenous anesthesia (n=30) and inhalation anesthesia (n=30) were retrospectively reviewed. The pain score on the numeric rating scale (NRS) was evaluated at 2, 8, 24, and 30 hours postoperatively. Results: The average NRS score of patients who received total intravenous anesthesia was lesser than that of those who received inhalational anesthesia. Moreover, the difference in the NRS scores at eight hours postoperatively was statistically significant (P &lt;0.05). Patients who received inhalational anesthesia had a higher pain score and experienced more severe pain than those who received intravenous anesthesia. Conclusions: Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol-remifentanil provided better analgesia for acute postoperative pain in patients who underwent thoracotomy than inhalational anesthesia, suggesting it may be considered the combination of choice for thoracic surgery.Abbreviations: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists, CRTS: Chronic post-thoracotomy pain syndrome, GABA: Gamma-aminobutyric acid, IL: Interleukin, NRS: numeric rating scale.doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.9907How to cite this: Lee JY, Jeong ST, Hwang JH, Park SH. Postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy: A comparison between total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(10):2219-2222. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.9907This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Chronic postoperative pain syndrome and its neuropathic component in long-term period of coronary artery bypass grafting

Background: Along with increased safety and quality of the early postoperative period, 6.9% of patients who undergo sternotomy experience chronic pain at the surgical site. The significance of this issue is underestimated, with a third of these patients developing a neuropathic component of chronic pain syndrome. Aim: To assess the severity of acute and chronic postoperative pain following sternotomy and to identify predictors of the neuropathic component of chronic pain syndrome. Materials and methods: Out of 115patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) randomized according to method of anesthesia, two study groups were formed based on the results of a telephone survey: a general anesthesia group (GA, n=28) and a combined anesthesia group (CA, n=34). As part of the posthoc analysis, a logistic regression model was built to predict chronic neuropathic pain syndrome based on gender, age, anesthesia method, and factors assessing the severity of the perioperative period and myocardial impairment. Results: Chronic postoperative pain syndrome was identified in 25.8% of patients, with a neuropathic component confirmed in 19.4% of cases. Pain severity at rest in the GA and CA groups was 2.0 (1.0) and 3.0 (3.0) points on a numeric rating scale one hour after extubation, and 2.0 (2.0) and 2.0 (2.0) points by the end of the first postoperative day (p=0.193 and 0.610, respectively). The logistic regression model achieved an AUROC of 0,82 (95% CI 0,68–0,96) with c2(10)=10.62, p=0.39. Conclusions: Neuropathic pain was diagnosed in 19.4% of patients following CABG. The use of regional anesthesia and the severity of acute pain did not impact the development of neuropathic pain syndrome in the long-term period after surgery. The proposed model for predicting the neuropathic component of chronic pain syndrome after CABG requires further improvement.

Clinical Efficacy of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic and Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Current guidelines for pain treatment recommend a personalized, multimodal and interdisciplinary approach as well as the use of a combination of drug and non-drug therapies. Risk factors for chronification should already be reduced in patients with acute pain, e.g., after surgery or trauma. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) could be an effective non-drug therapy in the multimodal treatment of chronic and acute pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of aVNS in treating chronic and acute pain conditions. A systematic literature search was performed regarding the application of auricular electrical stimulation in chronic and acute pain. Studies were classified according to their level of evidence (Jadad scale), scientific validity and risk of bias (RoB 2 tool) and analyzed regarding indication, method, stimulation parameters, duration of treatment and efficacy and safety. A meta-analysis on (randomized) controlled trials (using different comparators) was performed for chronic and acute pain conditions, respectively, including subgroup analysis for percutaneous (pVNS-needle electrodes) and transcutaneous (tVNS-surface electrodes) aVNS. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) was defined as primary efficacy endpoint. A total of n = 1496 patients were treated with aVNS in 23 identified and analyzed studies in chronic pain, 12 studies in acute postoperative pain and 7 studies in experimental acute pain. Of these, seven studies for chronic pain and six studies for acute postoperative pain were included in the meta-analysis. In chronic pain conditions, including back pain, migraine and abdominal pain, a statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control treatment with an effect size Hedges' g/mean difference of - 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 3.94 to 0.04, p = 0.008) could be shown and a more favorable effect in pVNS compared to tVNS (- 5.40 [- 8.94; - 1.85] vs. - 1.00 [- 1.55; - 0.44]; p = 0.015). In acute pain conditions, single studies showed significant improvements with aVNS, e.g., in kidney donor surgery or tonsillectomy but, overall, a non-statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control with - 0.70 [- 2.34; 0.93] (p = 0.15) could be observed in the meta-analysis. In acute pain results vary greatly between studies depending especially on co-medication and timepoints of assessment after surgery. A significant reduction in analgesics or opiate intake was documented in most studies evaluating this effect in chronic and acute pain. In 3 of the 12 randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic pain, a sustainable pain reduction over a period of up to 12months was shown. Overall, aVNS was very well tolerated. This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that aVNS can be an effective and safe non-drug treatment in patients with specific chronic and acute postoperative pain conditions. Further research is needed to identify the influence of simulation parameters and find optimal and standardized treatment protocols while considering quality-of-life outcome parameters and prolonged follow-up periods. A more standardized approach and harmonization in study designs would improve comparability and robustness of outcomes.

Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effects of Preoperative Acupuncture in High Anxiety Patients Undergoing Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Preoperative state anxiety is a known predisposing factor for enhanced postoperative pain and hindered recovery following total knee or hip replacement. Acupuncture administered preoperatively has been associated with reduced anxiety in surgical studies, yet evidence of its efficacy in the orthopedic surgical setting is limited. Objective: This study investigated the effects of preoperative acupuncture on preoperative anxiety and pain and compared acute postoperative pain between acupuncture and control patient groups. Design: Parallel-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Bone and Joint Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT. Participants: Sixty middle-aged and elderly men and women with clinically validated preoperative anxiety undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement. Intervention: One-to-one randomization to preoperative acupuncture (n = 30) or no acupuncture treatment (n = 30) on the day of surgery. Coprimary outcomes: Anxiety before and after preoperative acupuncture using the visual analog scale and postsurgical pain using the numeric pain scale. Secondary outcomes: Incidence of acupuncture-related complications, pain before and after acupuncture, nausea and vomiting incidence, opioid consumption, anxiolytics and antiemetics use, and patient satisfaction. Results: Patients reported lower anxiety and pain preoperatively following acupuncture compared with before treatment (both p < 0.001). Postoperatively, the acupuncture group reported lower pain in the first 3 h than the control group, although this difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in postoperative complications or patient satisfaction were observed between the study groups. Most patients were satisfied with the acupuncture treatment and reported a likelihood of considering preoperative acupuncture for future surgeries. Conclusions: These preliminary findings support that preoperative acupuncture is a safe and effective means to reduce perioperative anxiety and pain in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery. Additional studies should be conducted to best determine the value of preoperative acupuncture in total hip or knee patients presenting with surgically related anxiety. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (10/31/2023, NCT06099223).

Comparative Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Acute Pain and Chronic Pain Related to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment for chronic pain. However, its potential in acute pain management requires further investigation. The goal of this review is to assess and compare the effectiveness of SCS for managing acute postoperative pain against chronic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). A comprehensive search of databases identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined SCS for both acute and chronic pain associated with FBSS. Pain relief was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Study quality was evaluated using the Jadad score and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Evidence suggests that SCS significantly reduces acutepain, achieving over a 50% reduction in VAS scores. For chronic pain associated with FBSS, SCS demonstrated substantial efficacy, with a mean reduction of -2.45 on pain scales compared to baseline. When compared to optimal medical management (OMM), SCS was more effective, showing a mean reduction of -1.17 in pain scores for FBSS.Overall, SCS offers significant benefits in managing chronic pain, particularly in FBSS, by reducing pain intensity and opioid use. While the initial findings for acute pain relief are promising, further high-quality RCTs are needed to better understand SCS's role in preventing the transition from acute to chronic pain. Continued research into optimizing patient selection and stimulation parameters will be essential to improve therapeutic outcomes in both acute and chronic pain management.

Perioperative Pain Management in Hemophilic Patient Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Narrative Review

Background: Hemophilia type A and B is associated with spontaneous bleeding in muscle tissues and joints. Acute hemarthrosis, representing 70–80% of all bleedings in severe hemophilia patients, is extremely painful. When surgical procedures are needed in hemophiliac patients, perioperative management should be planned with a multidisciplinary team. Our narrative review, through a rigorous analysis of the current literature, focuses on pain management in hemophiliac patients. Methods: The report synthesizes a literature review on hemophilia, adapting PRISMA guidelines. It identifies a research question on surgical procedures and perioperative pain management. Various sources, including electronic databases, are utilized. Study inclusion criteria are defined based on the research question. Forty studies are included. A detailed study selection is illustrated. Results: Guidelines for managing acute postoperative pain in the general population advocate for a multimodal analgesic administration to enhance synergistic benefits, reduce opioid requirements, and minimize side effects. Recent recommendations from the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) for postoperative pain management in hemophilia patients suggest tailoring treatment based on pain levels, in coordination with anesthesiologists. Conclusions: Pain management in hemophiliac patients undergoing orthopedic interventions requires a multidisciplinary approach, with further research needed to define a reliable global standard of treatment.

Deep learning models for the prediction of acute postoperative pain in PACU for video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery

BackgroundPostoperative pain is a prevalent symptom experienced by patients undergoing surgical procedures. This study aims to develop deep learning algorithms for predicting acute postoperative pain using both essential patient details and real-time vital sign data during surgery.MethodsThrough a retrospective observational approach, we utilized Graph Attention Networks (GAT) and graph Transformer Networks (GTN) deep learning algorithms to construct the DoseFormer model while incorporating an attention mechanism. This model employed patient information and intraoperative vital signs obtained during Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) surgery to anticipate postoperative pain. By categorizing the static and dynamic data, the DoseFormer model performed binary classification to predict the likelihood of postoperative acute pain.ResultsA total of 1758 patients were initially included, with 1552 patients after data cleaning. These patients were then divided into training set (n = 931) and testing set (n = 621). In the testing set, the DoseFormer model exhibited significantly higher AUROC (0.98) compared to classical machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, the DoseFormer model displayed a significantly higher F1 value (0.85) in comparison to other classical machine learning algorithms. Notably, the attending anesthesiologists' F1 values (attending: 0.49, fellow: 0.43, Resident: 0.16) were significantly lower than those of the DoseFormer model in predicting acute postoperative pain.ConclusionsDeep learning model can predict postoperative acute pain events based on patients' basic information and intraoperative vital signs.

Comparative study of lidocaine- saline versus saline as washout for lumpectomy cavity on acute postoperative pain

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of lidocaine-saline solution compared to saline alone for washing out the lumpectomy cavity, focusing on its effect on acute postoperative pain—a prevalent and significant concern among patients undergoing breast surgery. MethodsIn this comparative study, 72 patients scheduled for lumpectomy surgery were randomly assigned to either the lidocaine-saline or saline group. The lidocaine-saline group was administered a washout of the lumpectomy cavity with 2 % lidocaine at a dosage of 1.75 mg/kg in 0.9 % normal saline, whereas the saline group received a washout with an equivalent volume of 0.9 % normal saline. We recorded the participants' basic characteristics, heart rate, blood pressure, the incidence and intensity of pain (measured by the visual analogue scale), and the usage of postoperative analgesics. ResultsThe two study groups did not differ significantly in their basic characteristics, heart rate and blood pressure. The saline group had significantly higher pain intensity than the lidocaine-saline group at 30 min after surgery (4.61 vs. 2.88, P < 0.0001) and at all other time points (P < 0.001). The saline group also took the first dose of analgesics earlier than the lidocaine-saline (46.66 Vs. 170.55 min, P < 0.001) and used a significantly higher mean dose of meperidine (77.50 mg vs 33.47 mg, P < 0.001). ConclusionThe use of a lidocaine-saline wash during lumpectomy procedures can significantly reduce postoperative pain and lower the necessity for analgesics in patients who have undergone breast surgery.

Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Management of Acute Postoperative Surgical Pain After Pediatric Cardiac Surgeries Through a Midline Sternotomy.

Ultrasound (US) guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a safe and effective technique in providing perioperative pain management in pediatrics with a high success rate. Was to compare the efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for management of acute postoperative surgical pain after pediatric cardiac surgeries through a midline sternotomy. One hundred patients aged 4-12 years were randomly assigned into two groups, both groups received general anesthesia followed by bilateral sham erector spinae plane block at the level of T6 transverse process using 0.4 ml/kg normal saline on each side in the control group (group C) or bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the level of T6 transverse process using 0.4 ml/kg ropivacaine 0.2% with a maximum dose of 2 mg/kg mixed with adrenaline 2 mcg/ml in erector spinae plane block group (group E). The postoperative pain scores were evaluated immediately post-extubation, at 1 hour, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 hours after extubation, total consumption of intraoperative fentanyl and time to first rescue analgesic administration were also recorded. There was a statistically high significant delay in the group E (314.72 ± 45.94) compared with the group C (36.7 ± 7.22) as regards to the mean (SD) of the time of the rescue analgesia (P < 0.001) (with 95% CI), moreover; the number of rescue analgesic was significantly higher in the group C compared with the group E (P < 0.001) (with 95% CI) and the mean (SD) of total intraoperative and postoperative levels fentanyl requirements in the group C were significantly higher compared with the group E (6.47 ± 0.98 and 5.09 ± 0.83) (with 95% CI) in group C versus (4.69 ± 0.71 and 2.31 ± 0.66) (with 95% CI) in group E respectively (P < 0.001) (with 95% CI). Ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB with ropivacaine and adrenaline delays the postoperative need of analgesia and reduces postoperative fentanyl consumption at 24 h in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery through midline sternotomy.

Comparison Between Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine in Achieving Opioid Sparing Sedoanalgesia in Patients Following Open Heart Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Opioid-sparing sedoanalgesia relies on non-opioid multimodal analgesic and sedative agents. It is being developed to decrease or eliminate opioid use for the management of acute postoperative pain to avoid opioid complications. This study aimed to compare ketamine and dexmedetomidine for their efficiency and safety in inducing opioid-sparing sedoanalgesia in patients following open heart surgery. Methods: Ninety adult cardiac patients who underwent open heart surgery were enrolled. They were randomly divided into three groups. Group D received a dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.1– 0.2 μg/kg/hour, group K received a ketamine infusion of 1–2 μg/kg/min while group C received a placebo as a control group. Drugs were given after the operation in the surgical intensive care unit. Total postoperative opioid consumption was the primary outcome. Richmond agitation sedation scale, visual analog pain scale, time to first analgesic request, patient satisfaction, and incidence of any complications were recorded. Results: In this study, we found that the median (interquartile range) postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in groups D and K than in group C (156 (40), 140 (83), 185 (110); p &lt; 0.001). Richmond agitation sedation scale was statistically significant until 6 hours postoperative (p-value: &lt; 0.05). Patient satisfaction score was higher in groups D and K than in group C (p-value: 0.005). On the other side, there is no statistically significant difference between the three study groups regarding time to first analgesic request (minutes) (p-value: 0.064) or visual analog pain scale (p-value: &gt; 0.05). Incidence of complications was highly significant between the study groups (p-value: &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: To decrease postoperative opioid use with their multiple side effects and improve patient satisfaction scores in patients undergoing open heart surgery under general anesthesia, the use of either ketamine or dexmedetomidine is recommended in the postoperative period as an adjuvant modality and a good idea with observation of possibility of some preventable side effects.

Prospective Study of Preoperative Negative Affect and Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: The Moderating Role of Sex.

Objective: Preoperative negative affect is a risk factor for worse postoperative pain, but research investigating this association among patients undergoing thoracic surgery is inconsistent. Additionally, female patients often report greater negative affect and postoperative pain than males. This prospective observational study investigated the association between preoperative negative affect and postoperative pain after thoracic surgery and whether this association differed by sex. Methods: Patients (n = 105) undergoing thoracic surgery completed preoperative assessments of pain and negative affect (PROMIS anxiety and depression short forms). Patients reported their daily worst pain over the first 7 postoperative days, and an index score of acute postoperative pain was created. Six months after surgery, a subsample of patients (n = 60) reported their worst pain. Results: Higher levels of preoperative anxiety (r = 0.25, p = 0.011) and depression (r = 0.20, p = 0.042) were associated with greater acute postoperative pain, but preoperative negative affect was not related to chronic postsurgical pain (anxiety: r = 0.19, p = 0.16; depression: r = -0.01, p = 0.94). Moderation analyses revealed that the associations between both preoperative anxiety (b = 0.12, 95% CI [0.04, 0.21], p = 0.004) and depression (b = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.26], p = 0.008) with acute postoperative pain were stronger among females than males. Similarly, the association between preoperative anxiety and chronic postsurgical pain was stronger among females (b = 0.11, 95% CI [0.02, 0.20], p = 0.022), but the association between preoperative depression and chronic pain did not differ based on sex (b = 0.13, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.34], p = 0.201]). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that negative affect may be especially important to the experience of pain following thoracic surgery among female patients, whose degree of preoperative anxiety may indicate vulnerability to progress to a chronic pain state. Preoperative interventions aimed at reducing negative affect and pain may be particularly useful among females with high negative affect before thoracic surgery.