Acute Postoperative Hemorrhage Research Articles

Impact of Glycemic Control on Morbidity and Mortality in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion.

This is a retrospective analysis of administrative database. To elucidate the effect of glycemic control on surgical outcomes of middle-aged and elderly idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a condition thought to adversely affect outcomes of spine surgery. However, no study has stratified glycemic control levels and their impact on outcome for idiopathic scoliosis patients receiving a spinal fusion surgery. Previous studies may have reported higher than true rates of complications for controlled diabetic patients, who are the majority of diabetic patients. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried from years 2002 to 2011. We extracted idiopathic scoliosis patients older than 45 years of age that received spinal fusion and analyzed complications and outcomes variables among 3 cohorts: nondiabetic patients, controlled diabetics, and uncontrolled diabetics. Multivariate analyses were used to assess whether glycemic control was a risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes. Controlled diabetics had significantly increased rates of acute renal failure (ARF), while uncontrolled diabetics had significantly increased rates of acute postoperative hemorrhage. In multivariate analyses controlling for patient factors and comorbidities, controlled DM was found to be an independent predictor of ARF [odds ratio (OR), 1.863; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.346-2.579; P=0.0002), and uncontrolled DM was found to be a significant risk factor for acute postoperative hemorrhage (OR, 2.182; 95% CI, 1.192-3.997; P=0.0115), ARF (OR, 4.839; 95% CI, 1.748-13.392; P=0.0024), deep vein thrombosis (OR, 5.825; 95% CI, 1.329-25.522, P=0.0194) and in-patient mortality (OR, 8.889; 95% CI, 1.001-78.945; P=0.0499). Controlled DM was found to be a risk factor for ARF in adult idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, while uncontrolled DM was shown to be a risk factor for postoperative hemorrhage, ARF, deep vein thrombosis, and mortality. The present study provides valuable data for better informed consent for patients with diabetes considering surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Level III.

Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Risk Factors for Acute Post-Operative Hemorrhage and Impact on Subsequent Hospital Course and Complete Nephrectomy Rate. An Analysis of 200 Consecutive Cases

Purpose: Clinical guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy (PN) as the preferred method of surgical excision of the small renal tumor whenever feasible. PN has comparable cancer cure rates to that of radical nephrectomy in this setting, and decreased risk of chronic kidney disease. A recognized devastating complication following partial nephrectomy is acute post-operative hemorrhage (APOH) from the reconstructed kidney. Risk factors for hemorrhage following partial nephrectomy remain poorly elucidated, as does the impact of hemorrhage on subsequent hospital stay. Identification of risk factors for hemorrhage may lead to a better understanding of and reduction of this complication. Material and Methods: We utilized a prospectively managed database comprised of patients undergoing open partial nephrectomy at our institution by the same surgical team from January 2006 to July 2012. Clinicopathologic factors assessed APOH for their relationships, including patient age, gender, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, coronary artery disease, American Society of Anesthesia Score (ASA), tumor size, RENAL nephrotomy score, pathologic result, cancer margin status, operative time, and intra-operative blood loss. The impact of APOH on subsequent hospital course was evaluated and compared with the entire cohort. Results: Data were analyzed from 200 consecutive patients. We identified 7 patients (3.5%) who experienced APOH. Compared with the entire cohort, APOH resulted in an increased hospital length of stay (median, 5 days; range, 2-11 days, p = 0.001), an increased transfusion requirement (median, 6 units; range, 1-16 units. p = 0.001), a greater risk of selective angiographic embolization (median, 2 procedures; range, 0-3, p = 0.001), and completion nephrectomy (n = 2, p = 0.001). One patient in the APOH group experienced cardiac arrest and was resuscitated. Clinicopathologic factors associated with

Early Laparoscopic Management of Acute Postoperative Hemorrhage after Initial Laparoscopic Surgery

The use of laparoscopic surgery has been well established for the management of abdominal emergencies. However, the value of this technique for postoperative hemorrhage in urology has not been characterized. We present our favorable experience with laparoscopic exploration after urologic surgery and suggest guidelines for laparoscopic management of post-laparoscopy bleeding. Three patients who developed hemorrhage shortly after laparoscopic urologic surgery and were managed by laparoscopic exploration were identified from a series of 910 laparoscopic urologic procedures performed at our institution from October 2002 to June 2006. Three patients, who were hemodynamically stable (two after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, one after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy), required prompt surgical exploration for postoperative hemorrhage not stabilized by blood transfusion (mean 2.7 units) at a mean of 19.4 hours after initial surgery. Clots were evacuated with a 10-mm suction-irrigator. Two patients were found to have abdominal-wall arterial bleeding and were managed with suture ligation. The third patient demonstrated diffuse bleeding from the prostatic bed, which was controlled with Surgicel and FloSeal. Bleeding was efficiently controlled in all patients, and none required post-exploration transfusion. The mean post-exploration hospital stay was 2.3 days. Significant hemorrhage after urologic laparoscopy is a rare event. We found laparoscopic exploration to be an excellent way to diagnose and correct such hemorrhage in certain patients. Early diagnosis with clinical and hematologic studies, a lowered threshold for surgical exploration, and specific operative equipment may decrease patient morbidity and the need for open surgical exploration.

Use of an ureteroileocecal appendicostomy urinary reservoir in patients with recurrent pelvic malignancies treated with radiation

Objective. Evaluation of a modified right colon urinary reservoir in a heavily radiated patient population undergoing pelvic exenteration. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with recurrent gynecologic, colorectal, and urological tumors who underwent total pelvic or anterior exenteration and urinary diversion from 3/01 to 7/03 using an ureteroileocecal appendicostomy urinary reservoir. Results. Fourteen patients were identified over the study interval. The mean age of the patients was 53 years (range, 22–78 years). All patients received external beam, intracavitary, or a combination of both radiation treatment modalities to the pelvis preoperatively. Eight patients received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) at a mean dose of 16.25 Gy (range, 12.5–17.5 Gy). The primary sites of disease were as follows: cervix, five; prostate, three; uterus, two; colon/rectum two; and one each for vulva and bladder. Complete stomal continence was achieved in all patients after a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2–31 months). Two patients experienced a traumatic disruption of the stomal-skin anastomosis in the early postoperative period (postoperative days 7 and 14). One late complication related to the ureterointestinal anastomosis was observed and consisted of an anastomotic stricture managed conservatively. One patient experienced an entero-pouch fistula following re-exploration for an acute postoperative hemorrhage. Conclusion. The early outcomes using the ureteroileocecal appendicostomy urinary reservoir in heavily radiated patients demonstrate the technical feasibility of this design as both minimal early stoma and ureterointestinal complications may occur. Longer postoperative follow-up will be required to address the late outcomes of this procedure and its ultimate use in this population.

Management of acute bleeding after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

The authors reviewed the incidence of hemorrhage after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of this complication and to evaluate various treatment options. The records for 450 consecutive patients who had undergone LRYGBP over a 30-month period, were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients, the abdominal cavity had been drained with 2 19-Fr closed suction drains. The charts of patients who had developed an intraluminal or an intraabdominal bleed were chosen for further review. 20 patients (4.4%) developed an acute postoperative hemorrhage. The bleeding was intraluminal in 12 cases (60%), manifested by a drop in hematocrit, tachycardia and melena. The other 8 patients (40%) developed intra-abdominal hemorrhage, confirmed by large bloody output from the drains. 3 patients (15%) with intraluminal bleeding were unstable and required a reoperation. All others were successfully treated with observation, and 15 patients (75%) required blood transfusions. The diagnosis and treatment of acute intraluminal bleeding after LRYGBP represents a surgical dilemma, mainly due to the inaccessibility of the bypassed stomach and the jejuno-jejunostomy, as well as the risks associated with early postoperative endoscopy. The presence of large intra-abdominal drains allows for bleeding site localization (intraluminal vs intraabdominal) and for more accurate monitoring of the bleeding rate. Most cases respond to conservative therapy. Failure of conservative management of intraluminal bleeding, however, is more problematic and may require operative intervention. A treatment algorithm is proposed.