Acute People Research Articles

Sign Language to Sentence Formation: A Real Time Solution for Deaf People

Communication is a basic need of every human being to exchange thoughts and interact with the society. Acute peoples usually confab through different spoken languages, whereas deaf people cannot do so. Therefore, the Sign Language (SL) is the communication medium of such people for their conversation and interaction with the society. The SL is expressed in terms of specific gesture for every word and a gesture is consisted in a sequence of performed signs. The acute people normally observe these signs to understand the difference between single and multiple gestures for singular and plural words respectively. The signs for singular words such as I, eat, drink, home are unalike the plural words as school, cars, players. A special training is required to gain the sufficient knowledge and practice so that people can differentiate and understand every gesture/sign appropriately. Innumerable researches have been performed to articulate the computer-based solution to understand the single gesture with the help of a single hand enumeration. The complete understanding of such communications are possible only with the help of this differentiation of gestures in computer-based solution of SL to cope with the real world environment. Hence, there is still a demand for specific environment to automate such a communication solution to interact with such type of special people. This research focuses on facilitating the deaf community by capturing the gestures in video format and then mapping and differentiating as single or multiple gestures used in words. Finally, these are converted into the respective words/sentences within a reasonable time. This provide a real time solution for the deaf people to communicate and interact with the society.

The Mystery of the Missing Boundary

and Contradiction, Roy Sorensen takes this to be the only legitimate response to a sorites argument: the induction step is false. There is a sharp boundary to the concept 'noonish', but it is epistemically inaccessible to us. The real problem, says Sorensen, is to solve the meta-paradox: why so many intelligent, philosophically and logically acute people do not accept this simple and unassailable response - why even he himself, after seventeen years of propounding it, continues to suffer cognitive dissonance about it. (Has not Timothy Williamson (1994) done about all that can be done to make this epistemic response to the sorites credible? Not to Sorensen's satisfaction. Williamson argues that it is beyond human cognitive capacities to discover the threshold fixed by the use of the word in the linguistic community. Sorensen intends to show that it is not merely beyond human cognitive capacities, but that the threshold is in principle, as an a priori matter, inaccessible to any being whatsoever. Williamson's thresholds are not inaccessible enough. Also, as we'll see, he is sceptical about Williamson's claim that the threshold is determined by the community's use of the word.) In Chapter 3, 'Forced Analytical Error', a thesis is introduced which is further developed throughout most of the book: 'there is a clear sense in which our beliefs are massively contradictory. The contradictions are inescapable