Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis Research Articles

Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis in Adolescents and Young Adults Is Unprovoked, Associated with Hypercoagulable States, and Has a High Incidence of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis in Adolescents and Young Adults Is Unprovoked, Associated with Hypercoagulable States, and Has a High Incidence of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

The outcome of endovenous intervention for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis with and without inferior vena cava filter

The outcome of endovenous intervention for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis with and without inferior vena cava filter

Single-procedure 8Fr rheolytic pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

PurposeWe hypothesize that single-procedure venous-specific rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) will result in improved clinical symptoms as measured by the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), as well as durable venous patency, with decreased hemorrhagic risks and costs associated with conventional catheter-directed therapy and prolonged lytic exposure.Materials and methodsThirty-three consecutive patients with symptomatic, unilateral, iliofemoral DVT who were treated with single-procedure therapy using the 8Fr rheolytic thrombectomy catheter were retrospectively analyzed from 2012–2021. ed data included technical success (> 95% clearance of acute thrombus), adverse events (AEs), and clinical and imaging outcomes at 1-month and 1-year.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in all 33 patients. Mean pre-procedure VCSS was 7.5 with mean edema and pain sub-scores of 2.6 and 1.8, respectively. Post-procedural total mean VCSS at one month was significantly improved (mean post-procedure VCSS = 0.3, mean reduction of 7.2, P < 0.01). Clinical improvement was sustained at 1-year (mean total VCSS = 0.2, P < 0.01). Primary patency was achieved in all patients at 1-month and 30 (91%) patients at 1-year. Among the 3 patients in which primary patency was not achieved at 1-year, primary-assisted patency was achieved in 2 patients. Secondary patency was achieved in the remaining patient at 1-year. No hemorrhagic AEs occurred in this study.ConclusionThis study suggests that single-procedure venous-specific rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT is safe and effective, resulting in durable clinical and radiographic results at one year, while also limiting hemorrhagic risks, mitigating costs of admission, and expediting patient discharge.

The background and role of catheter-directed thrombolysis evolving procedures for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

Minimal invasive treatment such as early endovenous thrombus removal for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) emerged in the end of last century. The principle is catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using either plasminogen activating agents alone, as ultrasound-assisted CDT, or in combination with mechanical devices as pharmaco-mechanical CDT. The interest for this treatment modality is the high rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with anticoagulation (AC) alone, especially after iliofemoral DVT. Recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early thrombus removal with AC alone, as well as non-randomized studies, have demonstrated favorable rates, or at least a decrease of moderate and severe PTS, in favor of these procedures. This article will summarize the background and evolution of the procedures in the last three decades and discuss fundamental criteria for inclusion and exclusion, focusing on the procedures regarding thrombus age and location, technical issues, complications and results including different outcome measures for PTS, for which iliac DVT involvement is a massive risk factor to be prevented.

Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis is associated with a low incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome and perioperative complications.

Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT) is associated with an incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) of up to 50%. PTS is associated with high morbidity, impaired quality of life and a significant economic burden. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of a single session pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT), dedicated venous stents and a risk mitigation protocol on the rate of PTS. Between 2015 and 2022, patients presenting with acute or subacute IFDVT treated with the same protocol of single session PMT, dedicated venous stents, and risk-mitigation measures were included. Procedural success rate, complications, stent patency and incidence of PTS were determined. Of 60 patients (58 ± 19 years; 65% male), the procedural success rate was 93%, with 7% of patients experiencing complications but no long-term sequelae or mortality. Most (n = 52; 87%) patients were stented, including 46% across the inguinal ligament. At 3 months post-procedure, primary, assisted primary and secondary stent patency rates were 89%, 93% and 98%, respectively, with no loss of patency or re-interventions after that. At latest follow-up of a median 48 months (n = 32), stent patency rate was 97%, with only three patients (9%) experiencing symptoms of PTS. Single session PMT, dedicated venous stents and a risk-mitigation protocol results in high success rate, excellent long-term stent patency and low incidence of PTS without compromising safety. These results support early intervention for iliofemoral DVT.

Interventional treatment for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

Interventional treatment for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

Cost Effectiveness of Early Endovenous Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis in the United Kingdom

Early clot removal using endovascular intervention aims to reduce post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) following iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). This may reduce long term morbidity but incurs a higher initial cost. This study examined the cost effectiveness of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmacochemical thrombectomy (PMT) compared with oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone for treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT in the United Kingdom. A combined decision tree (acute DVT complications) and Markov model [long term complications (PTS)] was used decision analytic modelling with five states: no PTS, mild PTS, moderate PTS, severe PTS, and dead. All patients started with acute DVT. Patients who survived acute complications transitioned into the Markov model. Cycle time was 6 months. A healthcare payer perspective and lifetime horizon was used, adjusting for excess mortality due to history of thrombosis. Data for probabilities, transition probabilities, mortality, and utilities were obtained from published literature. Cost data were obtained from UK NHS tariffs and published literature. Outcomes were mean lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost effectiveness. Over a patient's lifetime, OAC was more costly (£37 206) than CDT (£32 043) and PMT (£36 288). Mean lifetime QALYs for OAC (12.9) were lower than CDT (13.5) and PMT (13.3). Therefore, in the incremental cost effectiveness analysis, both CDT and PMT were dominant: CDT was less costly (- £5 163) and more effective (+0.6 QALYs) than OAC, and PMT was also less costly (-£917) and more effective (+0.3 QALYs) than OAC. Results were robust to univariate sensitivity analyses, but probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested considerable parameter uncertainty. Early interventional treatment of iliofemoral DVT is cost effective in the UK. Future clinical and epidemiological studies are needed to characterise parameter uncertainty. Further analysis of modern practice, alternative treatments, and optimised care models is warranted.

Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis Through a Jugular Approach with a Rotational Device.

To report the effectiveness of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) in the management of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) via the jugular vein using a slow rotation and large-tip device (SRD) in a large cohort of patients. From 2011 to 2021, 277 patients (mean age 45years, 59.2% women) were treated in 6 centres with PCDT for ilio-fémoral DVT. PCDT was performed via the jugular vein and consisted of one session of fragmentation-fibrinolysis, aspiration and, if needed, angioplasty with stenting. The aim of PCDT was to achieve complete clearance of the venous thrombosis and to restore iliofemoral patency. Residual thrombotic load was assessed by angiography, venous patency by duplex ultrasound and clinical effectiveness by the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta score > 4). All patients were treated via the jugular vein using an SRD, and all but one were treated with fibrinolysis. Angioplasty with stenting was performed in 84.1% of patients. After the procedure, the residual thrombotic load at the ilio-fémoral region was < 10% in 96.1% of patients. The rate of major complications was 1.8% (n = 5), the rate of minor complications was 4% (n = 11), and one patient died from pulmonary embolism (0.4%) At a median follow-up of 24months, primary and secondary iliofemoral patency was 89.6% and 95.8%, respectively. The rate of PTS was 13.8% at 12months. PCDT via the jugular vein using an SRD is an efficient treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT and results in high long-term venous patency and low PTS rates. Level of evidence Level 4, Case series.

Five-year Quality-of-Life Follow-up After Diagnosis of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

Five-year Quality-of-Life Follow-up After Diagnosis of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction.

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.

Central Venous Catheter as a Novel Approach to Postoperative Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

ABSTRACT Background and aims Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) along with postoperative thrombolysis (POT) has been the standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT). However, commonly used catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) approaches for POT carry certain disadvantages, including the need for a sheath, inferior comfortability, and catheter-related complications. Therefore, we propose a new simplified method of POT using a central venous catheter (CVC). Methods The retrospective study analyzed patients with IFDVT who underwent POT using CVC from January 2020 to August 2021. The treatment modalities included filter placement, thrombus removal, iliac vein obstruction release, postoperative CVC thrombolysis, filter retrieval, and adequate full course anticoagulation. Results A total of 39 patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent PMT surgery with a procedure success rate of 100%. In the post-PMT CVC thrombolysis, the puncture sites were located in the below-knee vein, including 58.97% in the peroneal vein. The mean duration of CVC-directed thrombolysis was 3.69 ± 1.08 days, and the total urokinase dose was 2.27 ± 0.71 MIU. A total of 37 patients (94.87%) had successful thrombolysis with a length of hospital stay of 5.82 ± 2.21 days. During CVC-directed thrombolysis, only four minor bleeding complications occurred, two of which were indwelling catheter-related. During the 12-month follow-up period, the patency rate and post-thrombotic syndrome incidences were 97.44% and 2.56%, respectively. Conclusion Thrombolysis through a CVC is a feasible, safe, and effective POT method, and could be an alternative to the conventional CDT approach for patients with IFDVT.

Improvement following restoration of inline flow argues against comprehensive thrombus removal strategies and for selective stenting in acute symptomatic iliofemoral venous thrombosis

ObjectiveRandomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of thrombus removal strategies in iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT) in providing early symptom relief and decreasing the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), especially severe PTS. However, the impact of quantum of residual thrombus burden (RTB) on PTS as determined by intravascular ultrasound examination and the role of venous stenting in the acute setting have not been evaluated and represent the focus of this study. MethodsSixty-nine limbs (65 patients) undergoing thrombus removal for acute symptomatic IFDVT between 2015 and 2021 formed the study cohort. The Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) (range, 0-27) grade of swelling (GOS) (range, 0-4), and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (range, 0-10) were evaluated initially and at 6, 12, and 24 months after thrombus removal. Quality of life was appraised using the CIVIQ-20 instrument. The extent of initial and RTB after the intervention was estimated using intravascular ultrasound examination. Grading was done as less than 50% (1), 50% to 99% (2), or 100% (3) of luminal thrombus fill within each segment (common femoral vein, external iliac vein, and common iliac vein) by a blinded rater and then combined to generate a total score. The use of stenting, both concurrent (severe residual stenosis/persistent occlusion) and delayed (quality of life impairing residual or recurrent symptoms), was evaluated. ResultsOf the 69 limbs, 53 underwent pharmacomechanical/mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), whereas 16 patients underwent PMT and catheter-directed thrombolysis with restoration of inline flow in all limbs. Post-intervention VCSS improved from 6 to 2 at 24 months (P < .0001). GOS improved from 4 to 0 at 24 months (P < .0001). The VAS pain score went from 5 to 0 at 6 months (P < .0001) and remained at 0 at 12 months (P < .0001), but increased to 3 at 24 months (P = .02). The CIVIQ-20 score improved from 38 to 22 (P = .001) over a median follow-up of 19 months. The median RTB total score improved from 9 to 4 (P < .0001). There was no impact of RTB total score (<3 vs >3) on VCSS (P = NS), GOS (P = NS), VAS pain score (P = NS) or CIVIQ-20 score (P = NS) at the various time points. Concurrent stenting was used in 23 limbs (33%) and delayed stenting was carried out in 10 limbs (14%). The median time to delayed stenting was 4 months after the initial thrombus removal intervention. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing PMT or PMT with catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute symptomatic IFDVT, the restoration of inline flow seems to be adequate to provide symptom relief and decrease the incidence of PTS. The extent of RTB does not seem to impact the VCSS, GOS, VAS pain score, or quality of life after such restoration. Stenting can be pursued selectively in the acute setting to help restore inline flow.

Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Symptomatic Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis Patients With Recent Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy, safety, and mid-term outcomes of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) for acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) patients with recent (within 4 weeks) aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Materials and methods: From January 2016 to February 2020, 11 acute symptomatic iliofemoral DVT patients with a recent history of aSAH were enrolled in this study. All patients had a history of aneurysm ligation or clipping previously, computed tomography (CT) scans revealed ventricular hemorrhage had been absorbed obviously and no residual aneurysm. The mean time of DVT onset after aSAH ictus was 19.2±4.5 days, and the mean Glasgow score was 6.8 ± 0.7 (range, 6–8). These patients underwent PMT with an 8 French Aspirex®S device (Straub Medical AG, Wangs, Switzerland), subsequent stenting was performed to relieve the underlying stenosis, followed by anticoagulation alone. The procedure-related complications were assessed after intervention. The follow-ups were conducted up to 1 year, the patency was evaluated via duplex ultrasonography, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) was evaluated using the Villalta scale. Results: Grade III (>90%) clearance was achieved in all 11 patients. Stenting was performed in 7 patients (63.6%). There were no cerebral rebleeding events or other severe complications except 1 puncture site bleeding during treatment. A total of 90.9% (10 of 11) of patients were alive at the 12 month follow-up, and 7 patients achieved a good functional outcome. At the 1 year follow-up, there was 1 patient (10%) with mild PTS. The ultrasound showed that the patency of the iliofemoral veins was 100%, and femoral valvular incompetence was observed in 1 patient. Conclusion: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy seems to be a feasible and safe treatment for acute iliofemoral DVT in selected patients with recent aSAH, and it shows promising results in restoring patency and reducing the risk of PTS.

Comparison of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Measures of Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life

In this 5-year follow-up study of patients treated for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PT) treatment was associated with a reduction in severity but not incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), while there was improvement in quality of life (QoL).

Aspiration mechanical thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral and central deep venous thrombosis

We describe our experience with the Indigo CATTM aspiration mechanical thrombectomy (AMT) system in 20 patients. A modification of the AMT technique was done in 7 patients (35%) whereby a snare was used instead of a separator. Technical success by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was noted in 8 patients (40%) while symptom improvement was noted in all patients prior to discharge. In 4 patients (20%), occlusion was noted on first post-operative day ultrasound; remainder demonstrated venous patency. Snare use was associated with higher technical success (85.7% versus 15.4%, p = 0.004) and less procedural blood loss (235 ± 40 cc versus 300 ± 55 cc, p = 0.04) compared to the separator.

Evaluation of Catheter Directed Thrombolytic Therapy versus Systemic Anticoagulant Therapy of Acute Ilio-Femoral Deep Vein Thrombosis

Abstract Background Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality all-over the world. Complications include pulmonary embolism (PE), post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), phlegmasia alba dolens, phlegmasia cerulea dolens and venous gangrene. The PTS is the most common cause of long-term morbidity and disability among the previous complications. Aim of the Work The aim of this work is evaluation of the regional catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy versus standard systemic anticoagulant therapy in cases of acute ilio-femoral deep vein thrombosis as regard to efficacy, safety as well as complications. Patients and Methods This study was conducted on 30 patients presented to the vascular surgery unit of Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital between February, 2019 and August, 2019 with acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (less than two weeks duration). Of the 30 patients, 18 were females and 12 were males. The age of the patients ranged between 22 and 55 years. Results The outcome results of early Follow up of the thrombolytic therapy was complete recanalization in 30.7% of the cases, partial re-canalization in 53.8% of the cases and poor recanalization in the remaining cases15.3%.While the follow up results of anticoagulant therapy was complete re-canalization in 6.7% of the cases, partial re-canalization in 60% of cases and poor recanalization in the remaining cases 33.3% Conclusion Catheter directed thrombolytic therapy using streptokinase, as a lytic agent in the treatment of acute ilio-femoral DVT is a safe and efficient technique.

Effectiveness of pigtail catheter crushing combined with AngioJet mechanical aspiration for treatment of acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis

Background/objectiveWe investigated the efficacy of combined pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi in the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). MethodsEighty-two patients with acute iliofemoral DVT were retrospectively divided into a pigtail catheter + AngioJet group (group A, 42 cases) and an AngioJet-only group (group B, 40 cases). The difference in the circumference of the healthy limbs before and after treatment, immediate thrombus clearance rate in the lower limbs, recannalization percentage of venous lumen, and duration of postoperative hematuria were compared to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination method. ResultsThe technical success rate was 100%, no serious bleeding complications occurred, lower extremity symptoms were effectively alleviated, and post-treatment recannalization percentage of venous lumen were similarly high in both groups. Group A fared significantly better than group B in immediate thrombus clearance (P < 0.05), intraoperative aspiration time (199.38 ± 68.55 vs. 295.30 ± 76.02 s), postoperative CDT urokinase dosage (2.10 ± 0.94 vs. 3.07 ± 0.94 million units), and duration of postoperative hematuria (13.23 ± 2.96 vs. 16.75 ± 3.11 h) (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, the recannalization percentage of venous lumen of group A and group B was 89.71 ± 16.02% and 88.64 ± 16.68%, respectively. ConclusionThe combination of pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi for acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis is safe, easy, and effective, with a satisfactory short-term outcome.

Contemporary treatment of May-Thurner Syndrome.

Compression of the left common iliac vein by the overlying right common iliac artery is a benign anatomic abnormality in most individuals. However, in patients with significant vein compression, outflow obstruction and chronic intraluminal venous damage may lead to May-Thurner Syndrome. This syndrome commonly manifests as unilateral left leg swelling or acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. In addition to clinical findings, diagnosis is made with ultrasound, computed tomography venography, or magnetic resonance venography. The extent of compression of the iliac vein is best determined by venography with intravascular ultrasound. Symptoms and hemodynamic significance of the compression guides the ideal treatment approach. Iliocaval stenting has become the standard treatment for this condition and has promising patency rates and clinical outcomes. This review paper provided an overview of pathophysiology, and utility and limitations of the existing diagnostic modalities and treatment options in the management of May-Thurner Syndrome.

Three-dimensional computed tomography venogram enables accurate diagnosis and treatment of patients presenting with symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

ObjectiveThe last several years has witnessed an increase in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic iliofemoral venous obstructive lesions. Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination has become the gold standard in the management of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO), it is an invasive technique. To ascertain the usefulness of noninvasive imaging technology in diagnosing and treating CIVO in symptomatic patients, we compared three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from computed tomography venogram (CTV) with IVUS examination. MethodsTwenty-two continuous patients who underwent IVUS interrogation during intervention for CIVO formed the study cohort. Patients who had stenting performed in the setting of chronic total occlusion of the iliofemoral segment or acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis were excluded. All patients underwent CTV as part of their standard preoperative work up. Minimal (smallest) luminal areas of the common iliac vein (CIV), external iliac vein (EIV), common femoral vein (CFV) and the inflow channel (segment caudal to the CFV) were obtained from 3D CTV and IVUS. Centerline length measurements were obtained from 3D CTV to estimate the length of the venous stents necessary; the inflow channel luminal area was used to predict the required stent diameter. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the association between the luminal areas obtained from the two techniques. Agreement was ascertained by use of Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 3D CTV in predicting luminal areas was also determined. Predicted stent diameters and lengths were compared against actual stent diameters and lengths used. ResultsPearson correlation statistic for luminal areas between 3D CTV and IVUS for the CIV was 0.89 (P < .01), for EIV was 0.77 (P < .01), and for CFV was 0.69 (P < .01). The correlation statistic for the inflow channel luminal area was 0.90 (P < .01). The sensitivity of 3D CTV in diagnosing CIVO in the CIV, EIV, and CFV were 100%, 100% and 80%, respectively. The specificity was 67%, 57%, and 86%, respectively, in the CIV, EIV, and CFV segments. The positive predictive value of 3D CTV in determining CIVO in the CIV, EIV, and CFV segments was 89%, 83%, and 92%, and the negative predictive value was 100%, 100%, and 67%, respectively. The overall accuracy was 91%, 86%, and 82% in the CIV, EIV, and CFV segments. Thus, 3D CTV is able to predict stent length within 9.5 mm of the actual stent length used. With respect to stent diameter, 3D CTV was able to predict within 2 mm of the actual stent diameter used 91% (20/22) and within 4 mm of the actual stent diameter used 100% (22/22) of the time. ConclusionsFrom a diagnostic standpoint 3D CTV does well with an overall accuracy ranging from 82% in the CFV to 91% in the CIV in predicting CIVO. It is also able to accurately predict venous stent diameter and lengths required, rendering it a good tool in the diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic CIVO.

Individual Choice for the Aspiration Thrombectomy Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Venous Thrombosis

To compare clinical efficacy, safety and cost of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) plus CDT for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). This was a retrospective study. A total of 126 DVT patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-one patients were included in the ART group and sixty-five in the MAT group. Clinical parameters were used to compare the groups. Clinical outcomes, complications and various medical expenses were analyzed. Technical success rates were 100% in ART and MAT group. There was no significant difference in the rate of thrombus clearance (lysis grades II and III) between ART group (98.36%) and MAT group (100%) (P=0.311). The incidence of venous damage was slightly higher in the MAT group (4.6%) than in the ART group (0%) (P=0.245). The cost of the ART group ($8,291.7±471.4) was significantly higher than that of the MAT group ($4,632.5±441.7) (P<0.001). ART and MAT appear similar with good clinical outcomes for acute iliofemoral DVT. MAT substantially lowers mean cost per patient compared to ART.