Acute High-grade Acromioclavicular Joint Research Articles

Assessment of Coracoclavicular Ligament Healing on MRI After Arthroscopic TightRope Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Arthroscopic-assisted fixation of acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation has gained popularity in the last decade. Coracoclavicular (CC) fixation using the TightRope device is a less invasive technique. To investigate CC ligament healing and functional outcomes after arthroscopic fixation using the TightRope device for acute AC joint disruption. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. The study retrospectively analyzed the data of patients admitted for arthroscopic surgical treatment of acute AC joint injury using a single TightRope device. The data collection commenced in October 2021. The Constant-Murley (CM) score and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score were used for functional evaluation. The CC distance (CCD) was measured on plain radiographs, whereas healing of the CC ligament was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Statistical analyses were conducted with the Mann-Whitney U test, independent t test, or paired t test, as appropriate. The analysis included 33 patients with a mean age of 37.7 years (range, 24-49 years) and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Significant preoperative to postoperative increases were noted in both the CM and UCLA scores (from 34.1 ± 7.6 to 93.3 ± 3.6 and from 8.7 ± 2.1 to 32.9 ± 1.7, respectively; P < .0001 for both). The CCD decreased from 21.8 ± 3.02 mm preoperatively to 10.6 ± 1.2 mm postoperatively (P < .0001). All patients displayed CC ligament healing on MRI. Two patients with superficial infection and 1 case of partial reduction loss were confirmed at the end of this study. The arthroscopic TightRope technique was found to be a reliable and less invasive method of fixation for acute AC joint disruptions. The CC ligament healed adequately based on MRI evaluation, and the patients regained their preinjury activities, with favorable functional outcomes and minor comorbidities.

Clavicular Hook Plate versus Dog-Bone Technique for Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation – A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Clinical Outcome Scores, Complications and Costs

Abstract Background Arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation techniques have been promoted as providing superior outcomes for the treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. Nevertheless, there is a lack of high-level evidence for clinically relevant benefits. At our institute, orthopaedic surgeons use an arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament fixation technique (DB), while general trauma surgeons use a clavicular hook plate (cHP) technique. Aims The aim of the study was to compare clinical outcomes, complication rates and costs between the two groups. Methods The hospital database was searched for patients treated for acute traumatic high-grade (Rockwood Typ ≥III) ACJ dislocation using either a cHP or arthroscopically assisted DB technique between 2010 and 2019. Seventy-nine patients could be included (56 patients in the cHP group and 23 in the DB group). QuickDASH scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, pain scores (numerical pain rating scale 10) and complication rates were retrospectively collected through phone interviews and by screening patient charts as well as surgical reports. Costs per patient were obtained from the hospital's accounting system. Results Mean follow-up was 54±33.7 and 45±21.7 months in the cHP and DB group, respectively. QuickDASH and SSV scores did not differ but patients in the cHP group reported significantly lower pain scores (p=0.033). More patients reported hypertrophic or disturbing scars (p=0.49) and sensibility disturbances (p=0.007) in the cHP group. Three patients suffered from a frozen shoulder in the DB group (p=0.023). Conclusions Patient-reported outcomes are excellent after long-term follow up for both techniques. There are no clinically relevant differences in clinical outcome scores based on our results and a review of the literature. Both techniques certainly have their benefits regarding secondary outcome measures.

Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Comparable Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Bidirectional Arthroscopic-Assisted Stabilization With the Single Low-Profile Suture Button Technique Versus Double-Suture Button Technique

This study was to compare the two-year clinical and radiological outcomes of an arthroscopic-assisted bidirectional stabilization procedure using single low-profile (LPSB) or double suture button (DSB) techniques with additional percutaneous acromioclavicular (AC) cerclage fixation for patients with acute high-grade AC joint dislocation. This retrospective cohort study compared male patients aged between 18-56 years with acute high-grade AC joint dislocation fixed with either a LPSB or DSB technique. Patients were examined at least 24 months post-surgery. Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Taft (TF) and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability scores (ACJI) were evaluated. Coracoclavicular difference, ossification, AC joint osteoarthritis and dynamic posterior translation (DPT) were assessed on bilateral anteroposterior stress radiographs and modified Alexander views. The revision rate due to implant conflict and duration of surgery were reported. Group outcome differences were analyzed using standardized hypothesis tests. 28 patients aged 39.2 (LPSB) and 36.4 years (DSB) (p=0.319; CI -2.77 - 8.34) were eligible per cohort. The follow-up was 30.5 (LPSB) and 37.4 months (DSB) (p=0.02; CI -12.73 - -1.08). LPSB patients rated a significantly higher SSV (93.2% vs. 81.9% (DSB); p=0.004). TF and ACJI scores were similar between groups. Coracoclavicular difference markedly decreased from 12 mm to 3 mm for both cohorts (p<0.001). Ossification was identified in over 85% in both cohorts (p=0.160; CI -0.77 - 0.13) and osteoarthritis in 21.4% (LPSB) and 39.3% (DSB) (p=0.150). Persistent DPT was found in around 30% for both cohorts (p=0.561; CI -0.26 - 0.48). The revision rates were 0% (LPSB) and 7% (DSB) (p=0.491). LPSB surgery was shorter (59.7 vs. 71.5 mins [DSB]) (p=0.011). The results of the LPSB and DSB techniques with additional percutaneous AC cerclage fixation showed comparable outcomes with excellent clinical and satisfactory radiological results. The assessment of the subjective patients satisfaction was in favor of the LPSB technique and no postoperative revision event was observed following this procedure.

Comparing the Anatomical Landmarks Versus the Coracoid-Based Landmarks Techniques for Coracoclavicular Stabilization After High-Grade Acromioclavicular Injury: A Biomechanical Study.

In acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, the aim of treatment is robust reduction and stabilization of the joint. The anatomical landmarks method is most commonly used for stabilization, but loss of reduction often occurs because of the suture tunnels. The purpose was to evaluate and compare the stability of coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization using the anatomical landmarks and coracoid-based landmarks techniques in treating a high-grade AC joint injury. It was hypothesized that stabilization using coracoid-based landmarks would provide better stability. Controlled laboratory study. Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (8 male and 2 female pairs) were randomized into 2 operative technique groups: 10 shoulders in the anatomical landmarks group and 10 shoulders in the coracoid-based landmarks group. The CC ligaments and AC capsule were cut at the midlevel, and CC stabilization and AC capsule repair were performed. For the anatomical landmarks technique, two 2.5-mm clavicular tunnels were created at 25 and 45 mm from the AC joint, while for the coracoid-based landmarks technique, two 2.5-mm clavicular tunnels were drilled using the medial and lateral borders of the coracoid base to choose the tunnel sites. Before injury creation and after stabilization, each shoulder underwent a loading force of 70 N in the superior and anteroposterior directions, and the displacement distance and stiffness were compared between the 2 techniques using the paired t test. The mean difference in displacement before and after stabilization was higher in the anatomical landmarks technique than the coracoid-based landmarks technique (1.82 ± 3.52 vs -0.18 ± 4.78 mm in the superior direction and 7.47 ± 9.35 vs 1.76 ± 3.91 mm in the anteroposterior direction), but none of the differences in displacement or stiffness were statistically significant between the groups. No significant biomechanical differences in displacement or stiffness were seen between the anatomical landmarks technique and the coracoid-based landmarks technique. Either stabilization technique can be utilized for repair of the CC ligaments in an acute AC injury setting.

Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage.

Purpose of this study was to demonstrate that a single tunnel reconstruction of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint instabilities with implants of the second generation is sufficient for stabilisation, especially in combination with an AC cerclage. Patients with an acute AC-joint dislocation type Rockwood III-B and V were included. Besides clinical follow-up examination, radiographs were analysed. The functional outcome measures were Constant Score (CS), Taft score (TS), ACJI score and patient's satisfaction. Horizontal instability was evaluated by clinical examination and radiological with an Alexander view. Thirty-five patients with a mean follow-up of 29months were included. Ninety-seven per cent were satisfied with their result, with an average Subjective Shoulder Value of 90%. The CS averaged at 90 ± 10 points, TS at 11 ± 1 points and ACJI at 78 ± 18 points. Radiologically, 3 of 29 patients (10%) showed a persisting horizontal instability. The coracoclavicular (CC) distance improved from 22 preoperative to 10mm postoperative, which was comparable to the contralateral side (10mm, p = 0.103). At follow-up the CC distance increased to 13mm (p = 0.0001). AC-joint stabilisation with a single tunnel reconstruction using a second-generation implant results in good to excellent clinical results with high patient satisfaction. The additional AC augmentation improves stability in horizontal instable AC-joints and is recommended in all high-grade AC joint stabilisations. Nonetheless, reduction was slightly lost over time due to an elongation or suture failure of the coraco-clavicular fixation. IV.

Arthroscopically Assisted Double-Loop Suture Repair for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption

The surgical management of acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) injuries has evolved during the last decades. Numerous surgical techniques exist and recently arthroscopically assisted or all endoscopic techniques have gained popularity due to certain advantages. The goals of the new anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction techniques are to achieve anatomic reduction of the ACJ to allow and facilitate primary healing of AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments, and also to minimize the risk of associated complications. We regularly use the open repair with double-loop sutures for the acute ACJ disruption, as described by Dimakopoulos et al. at 2006. In this surgical technique article, we present the arthroscopically assisted technique for the double-loop suture repair.

Clinical and radiological outcome of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A retrospective cohort study on Hook plate versus arthroscopic assisted single coracoclavicular tunnel with DogBone™ button dual FiberTape® construct

PurposeHook plate (HP) is a popular implant of choice in the management of highgrade acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations. Recently, suspensory loop systems have drawn significant interest with comparable results and additionally does not warrant implant removal. However, no studies have compared the outcomes of HP vis-a-vis Dog Bone TM Button with dual FiberTape® (DB). Methods38 patients who underwent HP or Arthroscopic assisted single tunnel DB fixation to stabilize high-grade ACJ dislocations were retrospectively included in study for clinically and radiological evaluation at a minimum follow up of one year. American Shoulder and Elbow Society and Constant Murley scores were used for clinical assessment. The radiological evaluation was done by assessing quality of reduction, measuring coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and extent of subacromial erosion. ResultsFor final follow up evaluation, both HP and DB group had 16 patients each. The mean follow-up was 55.38 ± 10.9 and 32.88 ± 14.0 months in HP and DB group, respectively. No significant difference in mean ASES (p=0.71) and CM score (p=0.62) was found between the two groups. The DB group revealed higher CCD at the final follow-up compared to the HP group (p=0.01). Although statistically insignificant, there were more subluxations and dislocations in the DB group (37.5%) compared to the HP group (25%). The subacromial erosion was noted in all cases of the HP group at time of implant removal. ConclusionBoth groups revealed satisfactory functional and radiological outcome. However, the DB group showed a higher tendency of loss of reduction.

Using a Modified Kirschner Wire to Pass the First Suture Under the Coracoid Base in Coracoclavicular Stabilization

The acromioclavicular (AC) joint injury is a common shoulder injury in sports medicine. Combined coracoclavicular stabilization with AC capsule repair is 1 of 2 preferred treatments in acute high-grade AC joint injury. In East-Asian populations, the surgeon prefers to pass the first suture under the coracoid base, which is difficult using only basic surgical tools. We propose using a modified K-wire to pass the first suture under the coracoid base.

Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation patients treated with titanium cable insertion under a homemade guider

BackgroundsTo describe a new technique for implanting a double-bundle titanium cable to treat acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation via the new guider, and evaluate clinic outcomes.MethodsA retrospective study of patients treated for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation from June 2016 to January 2020 in our trauma center, twenty patients with AC joint dislocation were managed with double-bundle titanium cable. It includes the following steps: (1) Put the guider under the coracoid close to the cortical; (2) drill proximal clavicle; (3) place the titanium cable; (4) perforate distal clavicle, (5) reset the acromioclavicular joint and lock titanium cable; and (6) suture the acromioclavicular ligament. An independent reviewer conducted functional testing of these patients, including the use of coracoclavicular distance (CCD), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and Constant–Murley scores (CMS).ResultsAll patients are presented following at a median duration of 15 months (12-24months) after the surgery. All patients based on X-ray evaluation and clinic evaluation. The median CCD was 7.5 (6–14) mm, the VAS score was 0.55 (0-2), the CMS score was 95.5 (92-99). One patient had subluxation again at the final follow-up based on X-ray examination.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that the AC joint fixation anatomically with double-bundle titanium, acquired excellent outcomes in terms of the recovery of shoulder joint function and radiographic outcomes. It has a low complication rate and need not remove the hardware.

Comparison of Hook Plate Fixation Versus Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Fixation Using Multiple Soft Anchor Knots for the Treatment of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

To compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) fixation using multiple soft anchor knots versus hook plate fixation in patients with acute high-grade Rockwood type III and V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. This retrospective study included 22 patients with acute Rockwood type III and V AC joint dislocations who underwent arthroscopic fixation or hook plate fixation surgery between February 2016 and March 2018. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: arthroscopically assisted CC fixation using multiple soft anchor knots group (AR, n= 12) and hook plate fixation group (HO, n= 10). We measured the CC distances (CCDs) and CCD ratio at 6 months, 1 year, and last follow-up postoperatively to compare the radiologic results between the groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 1 year postoperatively and at the last follow-up using the Visual Analog Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Magnetic resonance imaging after hook plate removal was used to evaluate the healing ligaments and tendon-bone interface. The patients in the AR group had better ASES, SPADI, and Quick DASH scores than the patients in the HO group at 1 year postoperatively and at last follow-up. The CCD and CCD ratio were significantly better in the AR group than in the HO group at the last follow-up period (P= .007/0.029). Magnetic resonance imaging findings showed grade I in 60% of patients in the AR group and grade III in 60% of patients in the HO group. AC joint arthritic change was observed in 40% of the HO group. The CC fixation method using multiple soft anchor knots showed satisfactory results and had superior CC ligament healing ability and maintenance of CCD than hook fixation. Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative investigation.

Can an acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separation be reduced and stabilized without surgery? A surgeon\u2019s experience

IntroductionWhile the management of Rockwood type III injuries is still a topic of debate, high-grade Rockwood type V injuries are mostly treated surgically, to anatomically reduce the acromioclavicular (AC) joint and to restore functionality. In this case report, we present a method for non-operative reduction and stabilization of a high-grade AC joint injury.CaseA 31-year-old male orthopaedic resident sustained a Rockwood type V injury during a snowboarding accident. His AC joint was reduced and stabilized with an AC joint brace for six weeks. The brace provided active clavicle depression and humeral elevation. After removal of the brace the AC joint showed a nearly anatomic reduction. Six-month follow-up weighted X-ray views showed an AC joint which had healed in a Rockwood type II position and the patient returned to full pre-injury function with a satisfying cosmetic appearance.ConclusionNon-operative reduction and stabilization of high-grade AC joint separations seems to be a valuable treatment option. A “closed reduction and external fixation” approach with the aid of a dedicated AC joint brace can reduce the AC joint and keep it in place until ligamentous consolidation occurs, thus improving AC joint stability and cosmetic appearance without surgical intervention.

Conservative Versus Operative Management of Acute High Grade Acromio-Clavicular Joint Injuries

The administration of type III Acromio-Clavicular (AC) Joint wounds stays questionable, while a re-visitation of past degree of practical movement with non-careful treatment has been archived in various case arrangement, careful decrease and coracoclavicular tendon recreation has been related with an ideal result and can be considered in patients who place high utilitarian requests on their shoulders or in competitors who take an interest overhead games. Careful administration is demonstrated for high-level (type IV) acromioclavicular joint wounds to accomplish anatomic decrease of the acromioclavicular joint, reproduction of the coracoclavicular tendons, and fix of deltotrapezial facica. Results after careful remaking of the coracoclavicular tendons have been good concerning accomplishing relief from discomfort and re-visitation of useful exercises, however further enhancements in the biomechanical quality of these builds are important to evade loss of decrease and creep with cyclic stacking. The aftereffects of this precise survey recommend that there is no clinical distinction in useful result scores in high-grade AC joint disengagements. Patients who go through non usable administration have a more fast re-visitation of work, however have a more unfortunate corrective result of their shoulder. Among the surgeries, the these days two most utilized strategies are the snare plate and arthroscopic methodology.

Treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations account for about 9% of shoulder injuries. Among them, acute high-grade injury following high-energy trauma accounts for a large proportion of patients requiring surgical treatment. However, there is no gold standard procedure for operative treatment of acute high-grade AC joint injury, and several different procedures have been used for this purpose in clinical practice. This review article summarizes the most recent and relevant surgical options for acute high-grade AC joint dislocation patients and the outcomes of each treatment type.

Factors Predicting the Outcome After Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

Background: Factors influencing the outcome after arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations remain poorly investigated. Purpose: To identify determinants of the radiological outcome and investigate associations between radiological and clinical outcome parameters. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted stabilization for acute high-grade AC joint dislocations. The following potential determinants of the radiological outcome were examined using univariable and multivariable regression analyses: timing of surgery, initial AC joint reduction, isolated coracoclavicular (CC) versus combined CC and AC stabilization, ossification of the CC ligaments, age, and overweight status. In addition, associations between radiological (ie, CC difference, dynamic posterior translation [DPT]) and clinical outcome parameters (Subjective Shoulder Value, Taft score [TS] subjective subcategory, and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability Score [ACJI] pain subitem) were evaluated using univariable analysis. Results: One hundred four patients with a mean (±SD) age of 38.1 ± 11.5 years were included in this study. The mean postoperative follow-up was 2.2 ± 0.9 years. Compared with patients with an overreduced AC joint after surgery, the CC difference was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 1.3-7.3; P = .006) higher in patients with incomplete reduction. Patients with anatomic reduction were 3.1 times (95% CI, 1.2-7.9; P = .017) more likely to develop DPT than those with an overreduced AC joint. An incompletely reduced AC joint was 5.3 times (95% CI, 2.1-13.4; P < .001) more likely to develop DPT versus an overreduced AC joint. Patients who underwent isolated CC stabilization were 4.8 times (95% CI, 1.1-21.0; P = .039) more likely to develop complete DPT than patients with additional AC stabilization. Significantly higher CC difference values were noted for patients who reported pain on the subjective TS (P = .025). Pain was encountered more commonly in patients with DPT (PTS = .049; PACJI = .038). Conclusion: Clinicians should consider overreduction of the AC joint because it may lead to favorable radiological results. Because of its association with superior radiographic outcomes, consideration should also be given to the use of additional AC cerclage.

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic assissted fixation of acute high grade acromioclavicular joint disruption

BackgroundManagement of high grade acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is considered a surgical dilemma. Open methods of fixation are the gold standard but the morbidities are frequent. The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic fixation of acute high grade (AC) joint dislocation. MethodsA series of 24 patients with acute high grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation were fixed arthroscopically using TightRope device. The study was done between February 2013 and February 2017. The functional outcomes were assessed using Constant-Murley score and University of California at Los Angeles shoulder (UCLA) scale. The preoperative and postoperative means of coraco-clavicular distance were calculated and used for radiological assessment. P-value < o.o5 was statistically significant. ResultsThe mean followed up time was 23.25 ± 7.1 (12–35) months. There was highly significant improvement in the Constant-Murley score and (UCLA) scale at the end of the follow up period. The coraco-clavicular distance was improved from 21.7 ± 3.1 mm preoperative to 10.17 ± 2.3 mm postoperative. There were two complications, one case had over correction and the other had mild transient post-operative burning pain along the course of ulnar nerve. ConclusionArthroscopic fixation of acute high grade (AC) joint dislocation is safe, minimally invasive technique with satisfactory functional outcomes and low morbidities provided that it is done by surgeons skilled in shoulder arthroscopy.

Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Fixation Using Multiple Low-Profile Devices in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

To introduce an arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) fixation technique using multiple low-profile devices to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation. Between July 2014 and September 2015, cases of AC joint dislocation that were treated with arthroscopic CC fixation using multiple low-profile devices with a minimum follow-up of 24months were included. We measured the vertical coracoclavicular distance (CCD) on the anteroposterior view and the horizontal acromioclavicular distance on 3-dimensional computed tomography images to evaluate the changes in radiologic outcomes before and after surgery. We compared final radiologic outcomes between initial AC reduction groups based on hierarchical clustering. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Constant-Murley score. We enrolled 27 patients in total, and the mean follow-up period was 27.2months. The mean CCD of the injured shoulder was 13.68 ± 3.98mm preoperatively and decreased to 5.72 ± 1.68mm immediately postoperatively but increased to 7.32 ± 2.29mm at last follow-up (P=.07). Horizontal displacement of the distal clavicle was 1.1 ± 1.0mm immediately postoperatively but decreased to 0.9 ± 0.6mm at last follow-up (P < .05). In particular, in the 2 groups that were determined using the hierarchical cluster analysis, patients with excellent recovery of the initial CCD (20 patients) showed less of an increase in the CCD at last follow-up than did those in the other group (7 patients) (P < .001). The Constant-Murley score was 93.5 ± 2.7 points on the injured side at last follow-up (P= .074). Our CC fixation technique with multiple low-profile devices exhibited satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes. In particular, ensuring good initial recovery of the CCD and the precise placement and location of the AC joints was important in maintaining the proper AC position at the final follow-up. Level IV, case series.

Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Prospective Assessment of the Clavicular Hook Plate Versus the Double Double-Button Suture Procedure

Background: The stabilization strategy for acute high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations with AC-stabilizing clavicular hook plate (cHP) or coracoclavicular (CC)–stabilizing double double-button suture (dDBS) is still under consideration. Hypothesis: The CC-stabilizing dDBS is superior to the cHP according to an AC-specific radiologic assessment and score system. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Seventy-three consecutive patients with acute high-grade AC joint separation were prospectively followed in 2 treatment groups (64.4% randomized, 35.6% patient-selected treatment): open reduction and cHP (cHP group) or arthroscopically assisted dDBS (dDBS group) performed within 14 days of injury. Patients were prospectively analyzed by clinical scores (Taft, Constant score [CS], numeric analog scale for pain) and AC-specific radiographs (AC distance, CC distance [CCD], relative CCD [rCCD; 100 / AC distance × CCD]) at points of examination (preoperative and 6, 12, and 24 months). The minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were assessed by the anchor-based method. Results: Twenty-seven of 35 patients (mean age ± SD: 37.7 ± 9.7 years) after cHP implantation and 29 of 38 patients (34.2 ± 9.7 years) after dDBS implantation were continuously followed until the 24-month follow-up. All patients showed significantly increased scores after surgery as compared with preoperative status (all P < .05). As compared with GI, GII had significantly better outcomes at 24 months (Taft: cHP = 9.4 ± 1.7 vs dDBS = 10.9 ± 1.1, P < .05, MCID = 2.9; CS: cHP = 90.2 ± 7.8 vs dDBS = 95.3 ± 4.4, P < .02, MCID = 16.6) and at 24 months for Rockwood IV/V (Taft: cHP = 9.4 ± 1.7 vs dDBS = 11.1 ± 0.8, P < .0005; CS: cHP = 90.1 ± 7.7 vs dDBS = 95.5 ± 3.1, P < .04). Clinically assessed horizontal instability persisted in 18.52% (GI) and 6.89% (GII; P = .24). The rCCD showed equal loss of reduction at 24 months (GII = 130.7% [control = 111%] vs GI = 141.8% [control = 115%], MCID = 11.1%). Conclusion: This prospective study showed significantly superior outcomes in all clinical scores between GII and GI. The subanalysis of the high-grade injury type (Rockwood IV/V) revealed that these patients showed significant benefits from the dDBS procedure in the clinical assessments. The cHP procedure resulted in good to excellent clinical outcome data and displayed an alternative procedure for patients needing less restrictive rehabilitation protocols.

Return to sport after acute acromioclavicular stabilization: a randomized control of double-suture-button system versus clavicular hook plate compared to uninjured shoulder sport athletes.

Traumatic high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations can be surgically stabilized by numerous anatomic and non-anatomic procedures. The return to sport (Maffe et al. in Am J Sports Med 23:93-98, 1995] and remaining sport-associated impairments after acute ACJ stabilization has not yet been investigated. 73 consecutive athletes with acute high-grade ACJ separation were prospectively assigned into two groups (64.4% randomized, 35.6% intention-to-treat): open clavicular hook plate (cHP) implantation (GI) or arthroscopically assisted double double-suture-button (dDSB) implantation (GII). Patients were analyzed using shoulder sport-specific measurement tools for sport ability (ASOSS), sport activity (SSAS), and numerical analog scales: NASpain during sport, NASshoulder function in sport, and NASre-achievement of sport level. Four points of examination were established: preoperative evaluation (FU0) and first postoperative follow-up (FU1) at 6months; FU2 at 12months; and FU3 at 24months after surgery. The control group (GIII) consisted of 140 healthy athletes without anamnesis of prior macro-injury or surgery. After surgical stabilization, 29 of 35 athletes in GI (82.9%; 38.6 ± 9.9years) and 32 of 38 in GII (82.9%; 38.6 ± 9.9years) were followed up for 24 months (FU3) (loss 17.8%). All operated athletes showed significantly increased scores compared to FU0 (p < 0.05). Compared to GI, GII showed significantly superior outcome data for sporting ability as well as for NASre-achievement of sport level (p < 0.05). While GII re-achieved GIII-comparable SSAS and ASOSS levels, GI remained at a significantly inferior level. Athletes after ACJ injury of Rockwood grade IV/V and overhead athletes benefited significantly from the dDSB procedure. The dDSB procedure enabled significantly superior sport-specific outcomes compared to the cHP procedure. Athletes after dDSB surgeries re-achieved the sporting ability and the sport activity levels of healthy athletes, whereas athletes after cHP implantation remained at significantly inferior levels. The more extensive dDSB procedure and the more restrictive rehabilitation are recommended for treatment of acute high-grade ACJ separations of functionally high-demanding athletes. I.

Conjoint tendon transfer: Tenodesis for coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction in acute high grade acromioclavicular dislocation

Poor long-term outcomes after Dewar and Barington technique (1965) in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation were reported. Its modification by conjoint tendon transfer - tenodesis may yield stable and anatomic reduction.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of patients with acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation treated with conjoint tendon transfer - tenodesis. Thirty-two patients were operated in the period between March 2012 and June 2015 and could be recruited and evaluated at the final follow-up. Preoperative documentation of coracoclavicular distance, VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain, ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) score and Constant score was done. Reconstruction was performed using conjoint tendon transfer - tenodesis. Statistical analysis was done using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) program version 20.0. At a median follow-up of 34.4 (range 24.3-60.2) months after the procedure, the coracoclavicular distance decreased significantly from a mean of 21.5 mm preoperatively to a mean of 11.5 mm postoperatively (P < 0.001). The VAS for pain improved significantly from an average of 8.5 points preoperatively to 1.2 at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). Constant score and ASES score improved significantly from 70.69 and 65 preoperatively to 95.25 and 96.4 respectively at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). A deep infection affected one patient. The study concluded that, coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction by conjoint tendon transfer - tenodesis technique achieves excellent results and could be considered a valid surgical option of management in acute high grade acromioclavicular dislocations.

Arthroscopically-assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations

Arthroscopically-assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations