Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Grade Research Articles

The Predictive Value of Serum DAO, HDC, and MMP8 for the Gastrointestinal Injury in the Early Stage of Acute Pancreatitis in an Animal Model and a Clinical Study.

This study was aimed at exploring the use of the acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade and sensitive biomarkers to investigate gastrointestinal (GI) injury in early stage of acute pancreatitis (AP). The AGI grade was used to evaluate intestinal function. Any GI injury above grade I (grades II-IV) was considered as severe. An AP rat model was created by retrograde injection of 4% sodium taurocholate. The pancreatic and intestinal histopathology scores were calculated by hematoxylin-eosin staining. Human and rat sera were assessed using ELISA. Tight junction (TJ) proteins were detected by Western blotting. In clinical study, the GI injury rate in mild acute pancreatitis (MAP), moderate severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP), and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) groups was 26.8%, 78.4%, and 94.8%, respectively (P < 0.05). Diamine oxidase (DAO), histidine decarboxylase (HDC), and matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP8) serum levels were higher in AP patients than in healthy people (P < 0.05). Patients with GI injury had higher serum levels of DAO, HDC, and MMP8 than those without GI injury (P < 0.05). In animal experiments, the serum levels of DAO, HDC, and MMP8 were higher in the AP group than in normal and sham-operated (SO) groups (P < 0.05). The expressions of tricellulin, claudin-1, ZO-1, and occludin were significantly lower in the AP group than in normal and SO groups (P < 0.05). The serum levels of DAO, HDC, and MMP8 are novel biomarkers of GI injury in the early stage of AP; their elevation indicates the development of GI injury in AP. The intestinal TJ disruption may be a primary mechanism of GI injury and requires more in-depth research.

Serum ACTH and Cortisol Level is Associated with the Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Grade in ICU Patients.

The relationship between acute gastrointestinal symptoms and cortisol or adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels has rarely been reported. We hypothesized that the elevation of serum cortisol or ACTH levels may be correlated with the severity of the acute gastrointestinal injury grade (AGI). This study was an observational study. All patients were admitted to the ICU between 2019.1.1 and 2020.1.1.. Serum ACTH and cortisol levels and clinical data were collected from the electronic medication records. The highest AGI grade during the ICU stay was the major endpoint to observe. The patient was treated in a standard procedure in the ICU. A total of 235 patients were included in our study, 132 of whom developed AGI. In univariate regression, cortisol level was found to be a risk factor for 28-day mortality. Serum cortisol and ACTH levels correlated with APACHE II, AGI grade, PCT, and CRP levels. Spearman analysis and partial correlation analysis indicated that cortisol and ACTH levels were correlated with AGI grade. The ACTH and cortisol levels were positively correlated with the higher severity of AGI grade. The cortisol level may be a useful way to access the GI injury.

Small peptide formulas versus standard polymeric formulas in critically ill patients with acute gastrointestinal injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Small peptide formulas versus standard polymeric formulas for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients with acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) have been a topic of debate. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare their clinical and nutritional outcomes. Relevant studies from January 1980 to June 2022 were searched in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials involving AGI grade I-IV patients were included, while children, non-AGI patients, and non-critically ill patients were excluded. Results indicated no significant difference in all-cause mortality. Patients receiving small peptide formulas showed higher daily protein intake, greater albumin growth, and higher prealbumin levels. They also had shorter lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Conversely, patients receiving standard polymeric formulas had a higher daily calorie intake. In conclusion, the choice of formula may not affect mortality in critically ill patients with AGI. Small peptide formulas were more conducive to increase daily protein intake, decrease intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of these two nutritional formulas on clinical and nutritional outcomes in critically ill patients with AGI are needed to confirm these results.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting enteral feeding intolerance in critically ill patients (NOFI): Mixed retrospective and prospective cohort study

Developing and validating a clinical prediction nomogram of enteral feeding intolerance (NOFI) in critically ill patients. So as to help clinicians implement pre-intervention for patients with high risk of enteral feeding intolerance (FI), formulate individualized feeding strategies, and reduce the probability of FI occurrence. From March 2018 to April 2023, patients who met the inclusion criteria but did not meet the exclusion criteria constituted the development cohort for retrospective analysis, and NOFI was developed. Patients recruited consecutively between May 2023 and July 2023 constituted the validation cohort for the prospective analysis for independent external validation of NOFI. Initially, a backward stepwise method was employed to conduct a multivariate logistic regression analysis in the development cohort, aiming to identify the optimal-fit model. Subsequently, a nomogram was derived from this model. The validation of the nomogram was carried out in an independent external validation cohort, where discrimination and calibration were evaluated. Additionally, a decision curve analysis was conducted to assess the net benefit of utilizing the nomogram for decision-making. A total of 628 and 143 patients, 49.0% and 51.7% of patients occurred FI, were included in the development and validation cohort, respectively. We developed a NOFI in severely ill patients and the primary diagnosis, Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade, and APACHE II score were independent predictors of FI, with the OR of the primary diagnosis of circulatory disease being 2.281 (95% CI, 1.364-3.816; P=0.002); The OR of respiratory diseases was 0.424 (95% CI, 0.259-0.594; P=0.001); The OR of AGI grade was 4.920 (95% CI, 3.773-6.416; P<0.001), OR of APACHE II score was 1.100 (95% CI, 1.059-1.143; P<0.001). Independent external validation of the prediction model was performed. This model has good discrimination and calibration. The decision curve analysis of the nomogram provided better net benefit than the alternate options (full early enteral nutrition or delayed enteral nutrition). The prediction of enteral feeding intolerance can be conveniently facilitated by the NOFI that integrates primary diagnosis, AGI grade, and APACHE II score in critically ill patients.

Acute gastrointestinal injury and altered gut microbiota are related to sepsis-induced cholestasis in patients with intra-abdominal infection: a retrospective and prospective observational study.

Sepsis-associated liver dysfunction (SALD) has high incidence and mortality in patients with intra-abdominal infection (IAI). The associations between acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI), gut microbiota, and SALD were evaluated in patients with IAI. A retrospective study was conducted to assess the relationship between AGI and SALD in patients with IAI. Patients were divided into non-SALD and sepsis-induced cholestasis (SIC) groups, which is a subtype of SALD. SIC was defined as total bilirubin >2 mg/dL. AGI incidences between the two groups were compared using Chi-square test. Subsequently, a prospective study was conducted to investigate the gut microbiota differences between patients without SALD and those with SIC. Fecal samples were collected on days 1, 3, and 7 after admission to analyze changes in gut microbiota using 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequencing. One hundred thirty-four patients with IAI were included retrospectively, with 77 SALD and 57 non-SALD cases. Among patients with SALD, 71 were diagnosed with SIC. Patients with SIC had a higher incidence of AGI compared to those without SALD (28.07% vs. 56.34%, p < 0.05), and a severity-dependent relationship was found between AGI grade and SIC occurrence. Subsequently, 20 patients with IAI were recruited prospectively, with 10 patients each assigned to the non-SALD and SIC groups. Patients with SIC had a more severe gut microbiota disorder on day 7 than those without SALD, including lower microbiota diversities, decreased abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and increased abundance of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria at the phylum level. Furthermore, Burkholderia - Caballeronia - Paraburkholderia and Delftia, the two most abundant genera, were significantly higher in the SIC group than in the non-SALD group. Functional prediction analysis showed that the top three KEGG pathways were ribosome, pyrimidine metabolism, and the two-component system. During the first week, the abundance of Proteobacteria decreased significantly, whereas Cyanobacteria increased in the non-SALD group; however, the phyla taxa did not change significantly in the SIC group. There exists a severity-dependent relationship between AGI grade and SIC occurrence in adult patients with IAI. A severe gut microbiota disorder was discovered in SIC during the first week of the intensive care unit stay.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Enteral Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients and the Effectiveness of Preventive Treatments: A Prospective Study.

Feeding intolerance (FI) is a prevalent cause of enteral nutrition (EN) disruption. Factors that can prevent FI are poorly described. To determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with FI in critically ill patients and the effectiveness of preventive treatments. This prospective observational study included critically ill patients admitted to the ICU of a general hospital who received EN through a nasogastric or nasointestinal tube from March 2020 to October 2021. Independent sample t-test, repeated measurement analysis of variance, and multivariate analysis were used to explore independent risk factors and the efficacy of preventive treatments. The study included 200 critically ill patients (mean age: 59.1 ± 17.8 years), of whom 131 were male. Most patients (58.50%) developed FI after a median EN duration of 2 days. The independent risk factors for FI were fasting for >3 days, high APACHE II score, and acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade I before EN (P < 0.05). During EN, whole protein was found to be an independent preventive treatment that significantly decreased FI (P < 0.05), while before EN, early use of enema and gastric motility drugs in patients with abdominal distention/constipation significantly decreased FI (for both, P < 0.05). The preventive treatment group had significantly higher intake of the nutrient solution and significantly shorter invasive mechanical ventilation duration than the without preventive treatment group (for both, P < 0.05). In ICU patients receiving nasogastric or nasointestinal tube feeding, FI was frequent, occurred early, and was more frequent in patients with fasting >3 days, a high APACHE II score, and an AGI grade before EN. Preventive treatments can reduce FI prevalence and result in patients consuming more nutrient solutions and having shorter invasive mechanical ventilation duration. ChiCTR-DOD-16008532.

Risk factors and predictors of acute gastrointestinal injury in stroke patients

PurposeThis prospective study investigates the incidence, risk factors, biological markers, and predictors of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) in patients with stroke. MethodsThe study involved a total of 98 patients with acute cerebrovascular disease were included. According to the ESICM, the definition of AGI in intensive care patients is classified as grade 0, I, II and III. Patients’ demographics, serological indicators (e.g., urea nitrogen, albumin, D-lactate, α-GST, neutrophil count and lymphocyte count), relevant scores (NIHSS score, GCS score, APACHE II score), length of hospital stay as well as the 7-day and 28-day mortality were recorded. ResultsIn 98 patients, the incidence of AGI was 90.8 %. The APACHE II, NIHSS, GCS and Hs-mGPS scores significantly increased the odds of a higher AGI grade (P < 0.05). Also, current use of antibiotics and the presence of pneumonia significantly increased the probability of a higher AGI grade (P < 0.05). NLR, diabetes and dehydrating drugs increased the probability of AGI grade II and III (P < 0.05). Finally, an early commencement of endovascular treatment significantly reduced the incidence of AGI class III (P < 0.05). Patients with higher AGI grades had longer hospital stays and higher 28-day mortality (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe degree of the neurological deficit in stroke patients (high NIHSS score, low GCS score) in this study was associated with the development of AGI. The patients' gastrointestinal barrier function continued to deteriorate during the week of onset. The APACHE II score, NRL score and HS-mGPS score have some predictive value for the occurrence of AGI in stroke patients.

Acute gastrointestinal failure is associated with worse hemodynamic and perfusion parameters over 48 h after admission in patients with septic shock: Retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) and hemodynamic and perfusion parameters in the first week of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and evaluate the association of AGI with ICU and hospital outcomes in patients with septic shock undergoing mechanical ventilation. This retrospective cohort study applied the criteria proposed by the European Society of Intensive Medicine to classify the participants into risk/dysfunction group (AGI grade I and II) and failure group (AGI grade III and IV). Hemodynamic and perfusion parameters data previously collected in the first 48 h after ICU admission (admission, 12, 24, 48 h) were analyzed. A total of 163 were included and classified into AGI grades I (n = 79), II (n = 64), III (n = 20), and IV (none). Groups consisted of AGI risk/dysfunction (n = 143, 87.8%) and AGI failure (n = 20, 12.2%) patients. Patients with AGI failure had higher heart rate and mottling score (MS) at admission, lower mean arterial pressure, and an oliguria incidence at 12 h compared with those without AGI failure. Skin MS and abdominal primary site of infection were risk factors for AGI failure. AGI failure tended to be a risk factor for ICU mortality (risk ratio [95% CI]: 1.37 [0.99-1.89]; P = 0.053). AGI was frequently observed in patients with septic shock in the first week of ICU admission. Higher heart rate and MS and lower mean arterial pressure and incidence of oliguria were identified in patients with AGI failure compared with those without. AGI failure was associated with ICU mortality.

Electroacupuncture in Treatment of Acute Gastrointestinal Injury in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

To evaluate whether electroacupuncture (EA) would improve gastrointestinal function and clinical prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) complicocted by acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI). This multicenter, single-blind trial included patients with TBI and AGI admitted to 5 Chinese hospitals from September 2018 to December 2019. A total of 500 patients were randomized to the control or acupuncture groups using a random number table, 250 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional treatment, including mannitol, nutritional support, epilepsy and infection prevention, and maintenance of water, electrolytes, and acid-base balance. While patients in the acupuncture group received EA intervention at bilateral Zusanli (ST 36), Shangjuxu (ST 37), Xiajuxu (ST 39), Tianshu (ST 25), and Zhongwan (RN 12) acupoints in addition to the conventional treatment, 30 min per time, twice daily, for 7 d. The primary endpoint was 28-d mortality. The secondary endpoints were serum levels of D-lactic acid (D-lac), diamine oxidase (DAO), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), motilin (MTL) and gastrin (GAS), intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), bowel sounds, abdominal circumference, AGI grade, scores of gastrointestinal failure (GIF), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS), mechanical ventilation time, intense care unit (ICU) stay, and the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia. The 28-d mortality in the acupuncture group was lower than that in the control group (22.80% vs. 33.20%, P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the acupuncture group at 7 d showed lower GIF, APACHE II, SOFA, MODS scores, D-lac, DAO, LPS, IAP, and abdominal circumference and higher GCS score, MTL, GAS, and bowel sound frequency (all P<0.05). In addition, the above indices showed simillar changes at 7 d compared with days 1 and 3 (all P<0.05) in the EA group. Early EA can improve gastrointestinal function and clinical prognosis in patients with severe TBI complicated by AGI. (Registration No. ChiCTR2000032276).

Comparisons between short-peptide formula and intact-protein formula for early enteral nutrition initiation in patients with acute gastrointestinal injury: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

BackgroundEarly enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill patients is important and most of them have suffered acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI). In this study, we investigated the influence of short-peptide EN formula and intact-protein EN formula on the prognosis of patients with AGI grades I–II to provide some guidance.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed. The primary outcomes were the percentage of EN calories (25 kcal/kg/d) and protein (1.2 g/kg/d) on the 3rd and 7th days of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, EN percent elevation in calories and protein on days 3–7, and the incidence of gastric retention and diarrhea after EN administration. Secondary outcomes included ICU and 28-day mortality, length of ICU stay, total hospitalization cost, and ventilator-free days. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with gastric retention and diarrhea. And we used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to compare 28-day mortality rates between the two groups.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in ICU and 28-day mortality, ICU length of stay, total hospitalization cost, or ventilator-free days in the short-peptide formula group compared with the intact-protein formula group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of 28-day mortality also showed no statistically significant difference. The EN percent elevation in calories and protein on days 3–7 in the short-peptide formula group was significantly higher than the intact-protein formula group (48% vs. 38%, P=0.03 and 37% vs. 38%, P=0.04, respectively). For gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, the incidence of gastric retention (15.5% vs. 29.8%, P=0.03) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 19.8%, P=0.04) were lower in the short-peptide group. In the multivariate-adjusted model, the use of short-peptide formula was the only independent variable of reduction in gastric retention and diarrhea [HR =0.469 (95% CI: 0.239–0.922), P=0.028; and HR =0.394 (95% CI: 0.161–0.965), P=0.041, respectively].ConclusionsShort-peptide formula is more easily tolerated by patients in the acute phase of AGI and can quickly achieve nutritional goals by EN provision, making it the preferred formula for the initiation of EN in the acute phase of AGI.

Nutritional intake and gastro-intestinal symptoms in critically ill COVID-19 patients

Background & aimsCritically ill COVID-19 patients seem hypermetabolic and difficult to feed enterally, due to gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms such as high gastric residual volumes (GRV) and diarrhea. Our aim was to describe the association of nutritional intake and GI symptoms during first 14 days of ICU admission.MethodsObservational study including critically ill adult COVID-19 patients. Data on nutritional intake [enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition] and GI symptoms were collected during 14 days after ICU admission. Target energy and protein feeding goals were calculated conform ESPEN guidelines. GI symptoms included GRV (ml/d), vomiting, abdominal distension, and faeces (ml/d). High GRV's were classified as ≥2 times ≥150 ml/d and diarrhea as Bristol stool chart ≥6. GI symptoms were defined as mild if at least one symptom occurred and as moderate when ≥2 symptoms occurred. Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grades of III were classified as GI dysfunction and grades of IV were considered as GI failure with severe impact on distant organs. Linear mixed model analysis was performed to explore the development of nutritional intake and GI symptoms over time at day (D) 0, 4, 10, and 14.ResultsOne hundred and fifty patients were included [75% male; median age 64 years (IQR 54–70)]. BMI upon admission was 28 kg/m2 (IQR 25–33), of which 43% obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2). Most patients received EN during admission (98% D4; 96% D10-14). Mean energy goals increased from 87% at D4 to 93% D10-14 and protein goals (g/kg) were increasingly achieved during admission (84% D4; 93% D10-14). Presence of moderate GI symptoms decreased (10% D0; 6% D4-10; 5% D14), reversely mild GI symptoms increased. Occurrence of GI dysfunction fluctuated (1% D0; 18% D4; 12% D10; 8% D14) and none of patients developed grade IV GI failure. Development of high GRV fluctuated (5% D0; 23% D4; 14% D10; 8% D14) and occurrence of diarrhea slightly increased during admission (5% D0; 22% D4; 25% D10; 27% D14). Linear mixed models showed only an association between AGI grades III and lower protein intake at day 10 (p = 0.020).ConclusionOccurrence of GI symptoms was limited and seems no major barrier for EN in our group of critically COVID-19 patients. Nutritional intake was just below requirements during the first 14 days of ICU admission. The effect on nutritional status remains to be studied.

Acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill children: Impact on clinical outcome.

To estimate acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) in critically ill children and association of its severity with mortality. In a prospective cohort study, critically ill children (1month-18 years) were enrolled. Gastrointestinal symptoms over the first week of admission were classified into AGI grades 1 through 4, using a paediatric adaptation of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine AGI definitions. Performance of AGI grades in predicting 28-day mortality was evaluated. Of 151 children enrolled, 71 (47%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 38.9-55.3%) developed AGI, with AGI grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 in 22.5%, 15.9%, 6.6% and 2%, respectively. The 28-day mortality progressively increased with AGI grade 0 (15%), 1 (35%), 2 (50%), 3 (70%), through 4 (100%), P < 0.001. Association of AGI grades with 28-day mortality was significant even after adjustment for disease severity, age and nutritional status (odds ratio (OR)=2.152, 95% CI: 1.455, 3.184). Among AGI grades, and paediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 score components, cardiovascular (OR=1.525, 95% CI: 1.142, 2.037) and haematological (OR=1.719, 95% CI: 1.067, 2.772) components of paediatric logistic organ dysfunction-2 score and AGI grades (OR=1.565, 95% CI: 1.001, 2.449) showed significant association with 28-day mortality. Nearly half of the critically ill children developed AGI. AGI grades were independently associated with increased mortality, and mortality progressively increased with AGI grade.

The Serum Citrulline and D-Lactate are Associated with Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Failure in Critically Ill Patients.

ObjectiveThis study attempted to screen and combine effective biomarkers to analyse the association between these biomarkers and gastrointestinal failure (GIF) in critically ill patients.MethodsA total of 110 critically ill patients with acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) admitted to ICU were enrolled. The AGI grade was determined by the AGI classification proposed by ESICM. There were 67 patients in gastrointestinal dysfunction (GID) group (AGI grade II), 43 patients in GIF group (AGI grade III–IV), and 41 healthy adults in healthy control (HC) group. APACHE II and SOFA score were used to evaluate the disease severity. Peripheral blood samples of patients were collected within 24 hours of admission to the ICU (prior-treatment) and after the conventional medication therapy for 7 consecutive days (post-treatment). Citrulline serum level was detected by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method, and D-lactate and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) serum levels were measured by ELISA. Pearson correlation, logistic regression, and ROC curve analysis were used.ResultsPatients with GID or GIF had lower serum level of citrulline, while higher levels of D-lactate and LPS than HC. Compared with GID patients, serum level of citrulline was reduced, while D-lactate and LPS were elevated in GIF patients. Correlation analysis displayed that serum levels of citrulline, D-lactate, and LPS were associated with the APACHE II and SOFA score in patients with GID or GIF. Logistics regression analysis showed that citrulline and D-lactate were risk for both GID and GIF. ROC curve analysis exhibited that combination of citrulline and D-lactate had relatively high value to distinguish GID from HC, GIF from GID, and GIF from HC.ConclusionSerum citrulline and D-lactate were associated with severity of GIF, combination of citrulline and D-lactate improved the diagnostic efficacy to identify GIF in critically ill patients.

Trefoil factor-2, an early predictor for acute gastrointestinal injury in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) is commonly present in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). It is often difficult to predict gastrointestinal function in the early stage due to lack of reliable markers. We aimed to assess whether early plasma trefoil factor 2 (TFF-2) is a potential predictor for AGI.Fifty one patients were included for the onset of AP (from developing abdominal pain) within 72 hours in this prospective observational single-center study from January 2013 to July 2015. Among them 23 patients were classified as mild, 17 as moderately severe, and 11 as severe according to 2012 Atlanta classification. Plasma samples were collected only once at admission to the ICU. Twenty samples of healthy adults were also collected as control. The TFF-2 levels were determined by using a human TFF-2 enzyme-linked immunoassay. AGI grades from 1st to 7th day after admission were observed.The plasma TFF-2 levels among AP patients in early stage were significantly higher than healthy controls (766.41 ng/mL vs 94.37 ng/mL, P < .0001). The correlations between TFF-2 levels and AGI grades from 1st to 4th day after admission were positive (r = 0.47, 0.43, 0.42, 0.40 respectively, P < .05). As a predictor of acute gastrointestinal failure, plasma TFF-2 was superior to others: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, sequential organ failure assessment, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, serum calcium. In addition, TFF-2 increased along with the severity of AP (r = 0.554, P < .0001) and associated with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, sequential organ failure assessment, C-reactive protein, serum calcium.The plasma TFF-2 levels were increased in patients in early stage of AP and correlated with AGI grades and disease severity in our study. TFF-2 might be a potential predictor for acute gastrointestinal failure in patients with AP.

Acute Gastrointestinal Injury and Feeding Intolerance as Prognostic Factors in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients

BackgroundAlthough acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) and feeding intolerance (FI) are known independent determinants of worse outcomes and high mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, the incidence of AGI and FI in critically ill COVID-19 patients and their prognostic importance have not been thoroughly studied. MethodsWe reviewed 218 intubated patients at Stony Brook University Hospital and stratified them into three groups based on AGI severity, according to data collected in the first 10 days of ICU course. We used chi-square test to compare categorical variables such as age and sex and two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-tests for continuous variables, including important laboratory values. Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized to determine whether AGI score was an independent predictor of survival, and multivariable analysis was performed to compare risk factors that were deemed significant in the univariable analysis. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis based on the AGI score and the presence of FI. ResultsThe overall incidence of AGI was 95% (45% AGI I/II, 50% AGI III/IV), and FI incidence was 63%. Patients with AGI III/IV were more likely to have prolonged mechanical ventilation (22 days vs 16 days, P-value <0.002) and higher mortality rate (58% vs 28%, P-value <0.001) compared to patients with AGI 0/I/II. This was confirmed with multivariable analysis which showed that AGI score III/IV was an independent predictor of higher mortality (AGI III/IV vs AGI 0/I/II hazard ratio (HR), 2.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.69–4.25; P-value <0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that both AGI III/IV and FI (P-value <0.001) were associated with worse outcomes. Patients with AGI III/IV had higher daily and mean D-dimer and CRP levels compared to AGI 0/I/II (P-value <0.0001). ConclusionsThe prevalence of AGI and FI among critically ill COVID-19 patients was high. AGI grades III/IV were associated with higher risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation and mortality compared to AGI 0/I/II, while it also correlated with higher D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. FI was independently associated with higher mortality. The development of high-grade AGI and FI during the first days of ICU stay can serve as prognostic tools to predict outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Intestinal fatty acid‐binding protein and acute gastrointestinal injury grade in postoperative cardiac surgery patients

Gastrointestinal complications post cardiac surgery are infrequent but difficult to diagnose and carry a high mortality. Plasma intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) concentrations and the relationship between I-FABP, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and postoperative outcomes were investigated in patients who developed gastrointestinal dysfunction (acute gastrointestinal injury [AGI] grade ≥2) and those with normal gastrointestinal function. Patients with (AGI 2 group, n = 11) and without (matched controls, AGI 0 group, n = 22) early postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction were extracted from a larger single-center prospective observational study, including adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation, and investigated in this nested case-control analysis. Both groups displayed variations in I-FABP concentrations with higher I-FABP on postoperative Day 1 compared to baseline and postoperative Days 2 and 3 (p < .001 and p = .005, respectively). The AGI 2 group had higher I-FABP concentrations on Day 2 compared to the AGI 0 group (p = .024). I-FABP on Day 2 correlated positively with AGI grade over the first 3 days (p = .036, p = .021 and p = .018, respectively). High I-FABP (defined as fourth quartile concentrations) on Day 1 was associated with more prolonged surgical procedures (p < .05). Furthermore, fourth quartile I-FABP on Day 1 and early gastrointestinal dysfunction were associated with higher frequencies of postoperative organ dysfunction (p < .05) and gastrointestinal complications (p < .05), and higher 365-day mortality. The present study indicates an association between intraoperative gastrointestinal injury, postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction and gastrointestinal complications. A high-powered study is needed to further explore this relationship and the interpretation of I-FABP concentrations in individual cardiac surgery patients.

Association of Changes in Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Grade with Prognosis in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center, Observational Study.

PurposeTo investigate the association between the change of acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade and the outcome in critically ill patients.MethodsThis was a prospectively observational study. All patients admitted in the ICU from October 2013 to June 2015, with the duration of ICU > 72 h and age >18 years, were enrolled in this study. The AGI grade and gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated during ICU stay following the 2012 ESICM recommendation. The ICU mortality, duration of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation (MV) use, vasoactive drug use, and continuous renal replacement therapy of patients were recorded accordingly.ResultsA total of 320 patients were included, and 265 of them were diagnosed with AGI. The overall ICU mortality was 11.88%, while it was 13.58% in patients with AGI. In logistic regression analyses, the decreasing trend of AGI grade was identified as a protective factor for ICU death (odds ratio (OR), 0.484; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26–0.90), while the max AGI grade was a risk factor (OR, 3.464; 95% CI, 2.71–8.47) for ICU death.ConclusionThe changes of AGI grades in critically ill patients were associated with their clinical outcomes. The ICU-acquired AGI patients associated with longer ICU stay days.

Effects of early enteral nutrition on the prognosis of patients with sepsis: secondary analysis of acute gastrointestinal injury study.

The time of enteral nutrition (EN) administration on patients with sepsis is controversial. The study was to explore the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) on the prognosis of patients with sepsis. We performed a secondary analysis of the acute gastrointestinal injury grade study. The patients were divided into two groups from the time of EN administration: EEN group (n=85): EN within 24 hours; Control group (N=78): EN after 24 hours. The key observation was the length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay, and 28- and 60-day mortality. Of 676 patients, 163 were included. There are no significant between-group differences in the characteristics at baseline. The overall mortality rate at 28 days in the EEN group was 28.2% vs. 43.6% in the control group (P=0.041). The mortality rate at 60 days in the EEN group was 36.5% vs. 52.6% in the control group (P=0.039). In a subgroup analysis of patients who whether used vasoactive drugs: the EEN group was found to be significantly associated with 60-day mortality (P=0.039). The ICU stay length in the EEN group was longer than in the control group {11 [8-22] vs. 10 [6-16]; P=0.022}. Also, the length of the hospital stay was longer than in the Control group {23 [14-53] vs. 18 [10-39]; P=0.023}. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that EEN, using vasoactive drugs, Acute kidney injury (AKI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and the global acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade were significantly (P<0.05) associated with 60-day mortality. In a multivariate analysis including these variables, EEN (HR1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.62; P=0.040, global AGI grade (HR2.28, 95% CI: 1.30-4.00; P=0.004), and APACHE II score (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07; P=0.021) were independently associated with 60-day mortality. EEN within 24 hours can improve the survival of patients with sepsis, and that is an independent prognostic factor.

Acute gastrointestinal injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China.

BACKGROUNDThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading rapidly around the world. Most critically ill patients have organ injury, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, cardiac injury, or liver dysfunction. However, few studies on acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) have been reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19.AIMTo investigate the prevalence and outcomes of AGI in critically ill patients with COVID-19.METHODSIn this retrospective study, demographic data, laboratory parameters, AGI grades, clinical severity and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoints were AGI incidence and 28-d mortality.RESULTSFrom February 10 to March 10 2020, 83 critically ill patients out of 1314 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Seventy-two (86.7%) patients had AGI during hospital stay, of these patients, 30 had AGI grade I, 35 had AGI grade II, 5 had AGI grade III, and 2 had AGI grade IV. The incidence of AGI grade II and above was 50.6%. Forty (48.2%) patients died within 28 days of admission. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome developed in 58 (69.9%) patients, and septic shock in 16 (19.3%) patients. Patients with worse AGI grades had worse clinical variables, a higher incidence of septic shock and 28-d mortality. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (95%CI: 1.374-2.860; P < 0.001), white blood cell (WBC) counts (95%CI: 1.037-1.379; P = 0.014), and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (95%CI: 1.020-1.340; P = 0.025) were risk factors for the development of AGI grade II and above.CONCLUSIONThe incidence of AGI was 86.7%, and hospital mortality was 48.2% in critically ill patients with COVID-19. SOFA scores, WBC counts, and duration of MV were risk factors for the development of AGI grade II and above. Patients with worse AGI grades had a higher incidence of septic shock and 28-d mortality.

Early Onset of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Dysfunction Is Associated With Unfavorable Outcome in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.

Objective:The distribution of postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and its association with outcome were investigated in cardiac surgery patients. Gastrointestinal function was evaluated using the Acute Gastrointestinal Injury (AGI) grade proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.Design:Prospective observational study at a single center.Setting:University hospital.Patients:Consecutive patients presenting for elective cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation (ECC).Interventions:None.Results:Daily assessment using the AGI grade was performed on the first 3 postoperative days in addition to standard care. For analysis, 3 groups were formed based on the maximum AGI grade: AGI 0, AGI 1, and AGI ≥2. Five hundred and one patients completed the study; 32.7%, 65.1%, and 2.2% of the patients scored a maximum AGI 0, AGI 1, and AGI ≥2, respectively. Patients with AGI grade ≥2 had more frequently undergone thoracic aortic surgery and had longer surgery duration and time on ECC. Patients with AGI grade ≥2 had statistically significant higher frequency of GI complications within 30 days (63.6% vs 1.2% and 5.5% in patients with AGI 0 and AGI 1) and higher 30-day mortality (9.1% vs 0.0% and 1.8% in patients with AGI 0 and AGI 1).Conclusions:Early GI dysfunction following cardiac surgery was associated with an unfavorable outcome. Increased attention to GI dysfunction in cardiac surgery patients is warranted and the AGI grade could be a helpful adjunct to a structured approach.