Acute Femoral Neck Fracture Research Articles

Posterolateral or Direct Lateral Surgical Approach for Hemiarthroplasty After a Hip Fracture

Hip fractures in older adults are serious injuries that result in disability, higher rates of illness and death, and a substantial strain on health care resources. High-quality evidence to improve hip fracture care regarding the surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty is lacking. To compare 6-month outcomes of the posterolateral approach (PLA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for hemiarthroplasty in patients with acute femoral neck fracture. This multicenter, randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing DLA and PLA was performed alongside a natural experiment (NE) at 14 centers in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18 years or older with an acute femoral neck fracture were included, with or without dementia. Secondary surgery of the hip, pathological fractures, or patients with multitrauma were excluded. Recruitment took place between February 2018 and January 2022. Treatment allocation was random or pseudorandom based on geographical location and surgeon preference. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2022 to September 2022. Hemiarthroplasty using PLA or DLA. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life 6 months after surgery, quantified with the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary outcomes included dislocations, fear of falling and falls, activities of daily living, pain, and reoperations. To improve generalizability, a novel technique was used for data fusion of the RCT and NE. A total of 843 patients (542 [64.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [7.5] years) participated, with 555 patients in the RCT (283 patients in the DLA group; 272 patients in the PLA group) and 288 patients in the NE (172 patients in the DLA group; 116 patients in the PLA group). In the RCT, mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 6 months were 0.50 (95% CI, 0.45-0.55) after DLA and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.44-0.54) after PLA, with 77% completeness. The between-group difference (-0.04 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.04]) was not statistically significant nor clinically meaningful. Most secondary outcomes were comparable between groups, but PLA was associated with more dislocations than DLA (RCT: 15 of 272 patients [5.5%] in PLA vs 1 of 283 patients [0.4%] in DLA; NE: 6 of 113 patients [5.3%]) in PLA vs 2 of 175 patients [1.1%] in DLA). Data fusion resulted in an effect size of 0.00 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05) for the EQ-5D-5L and an odds ratio of 12.31 (95% CI, 2.77 to 54.70) for experiencing a dislocation after PLA. This combined RCT and NE found that among patients treated with a cemented hemiarthroplasty after an acute femoral neck fracture, PLA was not associated with a better quality of life than DLA. Rates of dislocation and reoperation were higher after PLA. Randomized and pseudorandomized data yielded similar outcomes, which suggests a strengthening of these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04438226.

Gait pattern in patients treated with a total hip arthroplasty due to an acute displaced cervical neck fracture: a randomised comparison between 29 cases with a cemented femoral stem and 16 cases with an uncemented femoral stem.

The choice between cemented or uncemented stem fixation in the treatment of a femoral neck fracture may influence patient rehabilitation and the resulting gait pattern, due to potential differences in implant positioning and fixation. We used gait analysis to study temporal gait parameters, hip kinematics and kinetics in patients who, 2 years previously, had been randomised to treatment with a cemented or uncemented stem and due to an acute femoral neck fracture. 45 Patients implanted with a cemented Lubinus SP II (n = 29) and an uncemented (n = 16) Corail stem were studied. Gait analysis was performed using a 16-camera motion capture system and force plates. 28 subjects served as controls. Temporal gait parameters, hip kinematics and kinetics were analysed. The patients had no or minimum pain (median Harris pain score 44, range 40-44) and the majority had no limp (median Harris limp score 11, range 5-11). Temporospatial gait parameters and abduction-adduction motions and moments did not differ between patients with cemented or uncemented stems (p > 0.05). Patients with cemented stems did, however, show more hip flexion and less extension during walking than those with an uncemented stem (p < 0.05). Moreover, the flexion-extension range was less in the cemented group (p < 0.04). Compared with controls, the hip fracture patients walked more slowly, with a shorter stride length and a longer stance phase. Increased hip flexion and reduced extension in patients using the Lubinus SP II cemented stem could be an effect of its anteverted neck, but this question requires further study. Despite acute treatment with THA, hip fracture patients demonstrated a change in gait pattern compared with controls 2 years after the operation. This suggests that these changes are caused by the presence of an implant, or the soft-tissue trauma partly caused by the surgery than by any degenerative disease present in patients undergoing elective surgery.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04791605.

Functional Outcomes of Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Compared to Direct Lateral Approach for Total HIP Arthroplasty Following Acute Femoral Neck Fractures.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is becoming a more frequent treatment in the active elderly population. Since there is limited research available presenting clinical outcomes after THA using the anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) approach, the aim of this study was to compare this surgical approach to the direct lateral (DL) approach in patients treated by THA for FNFs. We retrospectively reviewed the data prospectively collected as a part of our "Hip Fracture Unit" and included 163 patients who underwent THA from January 2016 to January 2019 for acute displaced FNFs. A total of 132 patients who completed a minimum 2-years follow up (69 in the ABMS group and 63 in DL group) were included. The ABMS group demonstrated significantly shorter time to reach milestone for hospital discharge (1.5Days vs 2.1 days, P = .018), while no statistically significant differences were detected in peri-operative complications. At 3months, the timed up and go test, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford ip Score (OHS) were significantly better (P = .024, .032 and .034, respectively) in the ABMS group compared to the DL group. No differences were found in functional outcomes (HHS and OHS) nor in complication rate at 6, 12 and 24months. This is one of the first studies to analyze functional results of THA performed for FNFs through an ABMS approach. Results are in line with those already present in the Literature. ABMS approach allows earlier mobilization and better early functional outcomes, compared to DL approach, in patients undergoing THA for acute displaced FNF. No differences are found after 6months in functional results and complications rate.

Trends in incidence, health care consumption, and costs for proximal femoral fractures in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2019: a nationwide study

SummaryThis study evaluated the incidence rates and societal burden of hip fractures in The Netherlands. Although incidence in the elderly population is decreasing and hospital stay is at an all-time low, the burden of medical costs and crude numbers of proximal femoral fractures are still rising in our aging population.PurposeThe aim of this nationwide study was to provide an overview of the incidence rate and economic burden of acute femoral neck and trochanteric fractures in The Netherlands.MethodsData of patients who sustained acute proximal femoral fractures in the period January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019, were extracted from the National Medical Registration of the Dutch Hospital Database. The incidence rate, hospital length of stay (HLOS), health care and lost productivity costs, and years lived with disability (YLD) were calculated for age- and sex-specific groups.ResultsA total of 357,073 patients were included. The overall incidence rate increased by 22% over the 20-year study period from 16.4 to 27.1/100,000 person-years (py). The age-specific incidence rate in elderly > 65 years decreased by 16% (from 649.1 to 547.6/100,000 py). The incidence rate in men aged > 90 has surpassed the incidence rate in women. HLOS decreased in all age groups, hip fracture subtypes, and sexes from a mean of 18.5 to 7.2 days. The mean health care costs, over the 2015–2019 period, were lower for men (€17,723) than for women (€23,351) and increased with age to €26,639 in women aged > 80. Annual cumulative costs reached €425M, of which 73% was spent on women.ConclusionThe total incidence of hip fractures in The Netherlands has increased by 22%. Although incidence in the elderly population is decreasing and HLOS is at an all-time low, the burden of medical costs and crude numbers of proximal femoral fractures are still rising in our aging population.

Long-term results of a post-partum bilateral Garden 4 femoral neck fracture in a young woman with transient osteoporosis treated with closed reduction and internal fixation

Bilateral femoral neck fractures are very rare conditions. In our knowledge, only five cases were reported of bilateral acute femoral neck fracture secondary to transient osteoporosis. The present case is the first with a long-term follow up after treatment with closed reduction and internal fixation. A 32-year-old women was admitted to the emergency orthopedic clinic due to severe pain in both hips and an inability to walk one-day post-partum. Clinical examination revealed bilateral externally rotated legs and X-ray showed bilateral Garden 4 displaced subcapital fracture of the neck of the femur. The patient was operated on urgently by closed reduction and internal fixation. Osteoporosis was found in the measurements of bone mineral density and bisphosphonate with vitamin D medication was started. 6 years after surgery the patient can carry out her daily activities without limitation. His Harris hip score was 97 points/right and 95 points/left; and the X-ray was normal regarding osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis. Internal fixation should be the primary choice for the treatment of a bilateral femoral neck fractures with a high degree of displacement in young adults even with reversible poor bone quality condition such transient osteoporosis.

Clinical performance of the Femoral Neck System within 1 year in 125 patients with acute femoral neck fractures, a prospective observational case series

IntroductionOsteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is an important treatment option, especially for younger patients. We aimed to assess the rate of early implant-related complications in FNF osteosynthesis using the Femoral Neck System (FNS).Patients and methodsConsecutive patients diagnosed with displaced or nondisplaced FNFs were treated with FNS in this prospective, observational, multicenter investigation. Patients were followed up for minimally 3 months and up to 12 months if radiologic bone union and no pain was not achieved beforehand. Predefined treatment-related adverse events (AEs, defined as implant failure, loss of reduction, iatrogenic fractures, deep infection, and surgical revision), radiologic bone union, and patient-reported Harris hip score (HHS) and EQ-5D-5L index score were assessed.ResultsOne hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight (30.4%) fractures were displaced (Garden III and IV), and 37 (29.6%) were vertical fractures (Pauwels type III). Predefined treatment-related AE rate at 3 months was 8 patients, 6.4% (95% CI, 2.8–12.2), and at 12 months, 11 patients, 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5–15.2). Cumulative incidences of bone union were 68% at 3 months, 90% at 6 months, and 98% at 12 months. The mean changes of HHS and EQ-5D-5L index score between preinjury and at 12 months were -7.5 (95% CI, [ – 21.1] to [6.2]) and – 0.03 (95% CI, [ – 0.21] to [0.15]), respectively; neither were statistically significant.ConclusionThe current study on osteosynthesis of FNFs with the FNS resulted in treatment-related complication rates of 6.4% (95% CI, 2.8–12.2) at 3 months and 8.8% (95% CI, 4.5–15.2) at 12 months. On average, patients returned to preinjury function and quality of life. The current study may also indicate that the conventional wisdom of treating stable FNF in patients aged between 60 and 80 years with osteosynthesis may need to be reconsidered.RegistrationThe study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT02422355).

The Influence of Dorr Type and Femoral Fixation on Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Study

BackgroundThe American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines report moderate evidence for cementing femoral stems for hip fractures, mainly derived from hemiarthroplasty literature. This is the first large, nonregistry study examining the influence of femoral fixation, implant type, patient characteristics, and radiographic factors on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for acute femoral neck fractures. MethodsA multicenter retrospective study was performed of 709 THA cases (199 cemented, 510 cementless) for femoral neck fractures from 2006 to 2020 at three large academic institutions. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and radiographs were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were generated for multiple outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with P ≤ .05 denoting significance. ResultsCementless stems had a higher all-cause aseptic femoral revision rate (5.1 versus 0.5%, P = .002) and periprosthetic femoral fracture rate (4.3 versus 0%, P = .001). Each successive Dorr type had a higher fracture rate with cementless implants: 2.3%, 3.7%, and 15.9% in Dorr A, B, and C, respectively (P < .001). Logistic regression analyses confirmed that cementless stems (P = .02) and Dorr C bone (P = .001) are associated with periprosthetic fractures; collared implants and prophylactic cables did not protect against fractures. There was no difference in rates of dislocation, septic revision, or mortality between groups. ConclusionCementless stems during THA for femoral neck fractures have a higher aseptic femoral revision rate, specifically for periprosthetic fractures. Dorr C bone was particularly prone with an alarmingly high fracture rate. All fractures occurred in cementless cases, suggesting that cemented stems may minimize this complication. Level of EvidenceIII.

What’s New in Hip Replacement

What’s New in Hip Replacement

Hip resection arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fractures in the non-ambulator.

Objectives:Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is the current standard of care for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in non-ambulators. Despite excellent outcomes, arthroplasty-specific risks remain, including dislocation, implant failure, periprosthetic fracture and infection, and fat embolization syndrome. To eliminate the possibility of these complications, should non-ambulatory patients with acute, native hip FNFs be treated with simple hip resection arthroplasty (HRA) instead of HA?Design:Retrospective case series.Setting:Large, urban level-1 trauma center.Patients/Participants:Five non-ambulatory patients (6 hips) with acute, native hip FNF underwent femoral head and neck resection. Also, the most recent 10 FNFs treated with HA were also identified for comparison purposes.Intervention:HRA was performed via a Smith-Peterson approach with an oscillating saw or osteotome to complete the fracture or perform a fresh neck cut.Main Outcome Measurements:Outcomes included postoperative vs preoperative VAS pain scores and narcotics usage, and return to baseline functional status (sit up in bed or a chair postoperatively). Procedure time for HRA was compared with the 10 most recent patients with FNF treated with HA.Results:HRA resulted in decreased postoperative vs preoperative VAS pain scores (7.7 vs 3.3, P = .002), and decreased operative times (59.2 minutes for HRA, 111.8 minutes for HA, P < .001). All HRA patients had immediate return of baseline function.Conclusion:HRA offers shorter operative times when compared with HA, decreased postoperative VAS pain scores, and immediate return to functional baseline status without possibility of arthroplasty-specific complications. HRA may be an acceptable treatment option for FNFs in the non-ambulator.Level of evidence: IV

Does hip structural analysis confer additional benefit to routine BMD assessment in postmenopausal women with hip fracture? A study from a tertiary center in southern India.

There is limited information with regard to comprehensive bone health in Indian postmenopausal women with neck of femur fracture. We studied the bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), proximal hip geometry, and bone mineral biochemistry in postmenopausal women with and without femoral neck fractures. This was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care center in South India. BMD, TBS, and hip structural analysis (HSA) were assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Bone mineral biochemical profiles were also studied. A total of 90 postmenopausal women with acute femoral neck fracture with mean (SD) age of 63.2 (6.1) years and 90 age-matched controls were included. The prevalence of osteoporosis was higher among cases as compared to controls (83.3% vs 47.8%; P < 0.001). Degraded bone microarchitecture (TBS value < 1.200) was more frequent among women with hip fracture as compared to controls (46.7% vs 31.1%; P = 0.032). Cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) was significantly lower at the narrow neck (NN) and inter-trochanteric (IT) region in cases (P < 0.05) and buckling ratio (BR) was significantly higher at all three sites in postmenopausal women with femoral neck fracture as compared controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that femoral neck osteoporosis, low CSMI at NN and high BR at NN and femoral shaft emerged as factors significantly associated with femoral neck fractures. This study highlights that impaired parameters of proximal hip geometry and a low trabecular bone score may be significantly associated with femoral neck fractures in postmenopausal women.

Osteosynthesis of acute femoral neck fracture in a young adult with ipsilateral transfemoral amputation

Management of fracture neck of the femur in young adults with above-knee amputation is a challenging scenario for even the most experienced orthopedic surgeon owing to the short lever arm possessed by the residual limb to perform a closed reduction. We report a unique case of fracture neck of the right femur successfully managed by closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation in a 43-year-old male who had undergone an ipsilateral transfemoral amputation 15 years back.

A comparative study of functional outcome of bipolar hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in fracture neck of femur in elderly patients

Introduction: Fractures of the femoral neck are an international public health problem mainly occurring in elderly patients and resulting in high mortality. With the aging population, the incidence of these fractures is steadily increasing. Treatment choices for the neck of femur fractures in the elderly age group includes hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip replacement (THR). The treatment option must be decided by the type of fracture, condition of the patient, functional demands, medical and mental ability to cope with the surgery. This study compares bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BH) and total hip replacement (THR) in elderly patients with neck of femur fracture. Aim: To evaluate the functional outcome, complications and mortality of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty as a treatment modality in neck of femur fracture patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Rajah Muthiah medical college, in which 30 Patients of age 55 years and above who underwent hip arthroplasty (BHA or THA) for neck of femur fracture with follow up were included. Patients were separated into two groups by random allocation. Patients of group 1 (15 patients) were treated by bipolar hemiarthroplasty and group 2 (15 patients) by total hip arthroplasty. Both groups were followed up post-operatively for one year, at 6, 12 months, for surgical complications including dislocation, fracture, surgical site infection, and, one-year mortality and functional outcome using Modified Harris Hip Score. Results: Modified Harris Hip Score was higher in Total hip arthroplasty group compared to bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, pain was similar in both groups post operatively. Gait and range of motion were higher in the Total Hip Arthroplasty group, no significant difference was seen in mortality and post-operative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: In our study, we conclude that Total hip arthroplasty is ideal to treat femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with arthritic changes and has a lower risk of re operation when compared to Bipolar hemiarthroplasty, however bipolar hemiarthroplasty has a better outcome in cases of acute femoral neck fractures, based on our study.

Ultra-short cementless anatomical stem for intracapsular femoral neck fractures in patients younger than 60 years.

The aim of this study was to present the midterm results of total hip arthroplasty with ultra-short anatomical cementless stem in the primary treatment of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in patients younger 60 years. From 2006 to 2015, 17 hip arthroplasties (with the Proxima stem) were performed in group of 17 patients for the treatment of acute femoral neck fractures Garden type III and IV. The mean follow-up period was 112.7 (range: 64-148) months. Patients were evaluated retrospectively - clinically and radiographically, using the Harris hip scoring system during the year 2020. Seven males and ten females (mean age: 45.0 years) were included in the study. Each of them had one or more risk factors (time delay, comminution of the femoral neck, corticosteroids usage, the presence of coxarthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, alcohol abuse, etc…), because of which the osteosynthesis was not performed. Harris hip scores were 6.3 preoperatively and 82.9 at the final follow-up. Three patients (17.6%) had complications: luxation, aseptic stem loosening (migration with subsidence - "varisation" and thigh pain) and deep infection. One patient (5.9%) with infection was revised. In carefully selected younger patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture, where the osteosynthesis as first treatment option should be associated with high risk of complication (avascular femoral head necrosis, non-union) due to the presence of risk factors, the primary total hip arthroplasty could be performed. The ultra-short cementless stem offers promising results in these rare cases in the midterm.

Dual mobility cups do not reduce the revision risk for patients with acute femoral neck fracture: A matched cohort study from the Swedish Arthroplasty Register

IntroductionDual mobility cups (DMC) are gaining in popularity, as a method to reduce the risk of dislocation after fracture-related hip arthroplasty. Our aim was to compare revision rate in general, as well as due to dislocation and infection, after DMC and conventional THA due to femoral neck fracture, for each of the two groups of lateral and posterior approach. Materials and MethodsThis observational cohort study based on the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SAR) compared 2242 patients with dual mobility cups (DMC) and 6726 with conventional total hip arthroplasty (cTHA), all due to acute fracture 2005–2019. This was after propensity score matching of 1:3 (age, gender, ASA). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to investigate the 5-year revision rate after DMC and cTHA in the posterior and lateral approach groups. ResultsThe rates of revision in general, and due to dislocation or infection, were similar for DMC and cTHA in the different approach groups during the follow-up. The cumulative revision rate after posterior approach was 4.7% (95% CI 3.1–6.2) for DMC and 4.8% (3.8–5.7) for cTHA at 5 years. For lateral approach, the result was 2.3% (CI 1.3–3.3) for DMC and 3.7% (CI 3.0–4.4) for cTHA.The 5-year results for cumulative revision rate due to dislocation after posterior approach were 1.3% (0.4–2.2) for DMC and 2.2% (1.5–2.8) for cTHA. Corresponding results for lateral approach was 0.4% (0–0.8) for DMC and 0.7% (0.4–1) for cTHA. DiscussionWith implant revision surgery as outcome, we could not detect any differences between DMC and cTHA. Further studies with high external validity are needed regarding total dislocation rate, patient-reported outcome, cost-effectiveness and learning curve, to make a definitive recommendation on the use of DMC for fracture cases. ConclusionsAs treatment of acute femoral neck fractures, total hip arthroplasty with a dual mobility cup have similar outcome in terms of revisions in general, and due to dislocation or infections specifically, as one with conventional bearing. The similar outcome is regardless of surgical approach.

217 Covid-19 And Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Review

AimCovid-19 has dominated healthcare over the past year. It most severely affects the elderly, a population whom also commonly present following falls, sustaining femoral neck fractures. Our aim was to retrospectively evaluate the effects of concomitant covid-19 infection in patients presenting acutely with femoral neck fractures.MethodWe conducted a retrospective review of all patients with femoral neck fractures during the ‘first wave’ of the coronavirus pandemic in Ysbyty Gwynedd (Bangor, UK), between April 2020 to June 2020. We noted each patient’s covid-19 status within 14 days of presentation with their acute femoral neck fracture and compared length of stay, discharge destination and mortality rate between covid and non-covid groups.ResultsThere was a total of 75 femoral neck fractures in the 3-month period studied. 4 patients had incomplete data and were excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 71 patients, 15 (21%) were covid-positive within 14 days of admission, 47 patients (66%) were confirmed covid-negative and 9 patients (13%) received no coronavirus testing. The average age of patients was 88 in the covid-positive group and 84 in the covid-negative group. Those who developed covid-19 infection had an increased length of hospital stay (33 days covid-positive versus 14 days covid-negative; p = 0.25) and significantly increased in-hospital mortality rate (47% covid-positive versus 6% covid-negative; p = 0.001).ConclusionsThese results show that concomitant infection with covid-19 shortly after femoral neck fracture is associated with a significant increase in hospital mortality. They highlight the importance of trying to prevent covid-19 infection in this patient group.

Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Treated With Hip Arthroplasty in Solid Organ Transplant Patients.

BackgroundSolid organ transplant (SOT) patients have increased risk of complications, infection, and mortality after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study aims to compare SOT recipients' clinical outcomes to a matched group of nontransplant patients after nonelective THA and hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture (FNF).MethodsA retrospective review identified 31 SOT patients undergoing hip arthroplasty (24 hemiarthroplasty and 7 THA) for FNF and were matched 1:1 to non-SOT patients based on age, sex, body mass index, surgical procedure, and year of surgery. Patient survivorship, perioperative outcomes, complications, and reoperations were compared. The mean follow-up was 3 years.ResultsThe estimated survivorship free from mortality for SOT and non-SOT patients at 1- year was not different (77% and 84%, respectively, P = .52). The 90-day readmission rate was significantly higher with 8 (26%) in the SOT cohort and none in the non-SOT group (P < .01). Major medical complications occurred in 16% of SOT patients compared to 5% in controls (P = .21). Three (10%) reoperations/revisions were required for SOT patients and none in non-SOT group (P = .24).ConclusionSOT recipients undergoing nonelective hip arthroplasty for FNF demonstrated increased readmission rates compared to matched controls. For this rare clinical scenario, diligent perioperative care by surgeons and multidisciplinary transplant specialists is necessary to mitigate increased risk of SOT patients.

Intraoperative monitoring of femoral head perfusion in adult femoral neck fractures.

Objectives:To validate a novel intraoperative method of quantifying femoral head perfusion in adult patients with femoral neck fractures and to determine whether the lack of a perfusion waveform correlates with the development of osteonecrosis, nonunion, or reoperation.Design:Prospective cohort.Setting:Level 1 trauma center.Patients/Participants:Nineteen patients with 20 acute femoral neck fractures treated with hip-preserving surgical fixation. All patients underwent intraoperative quantification of femoral head perfusion.Intervention:Intraoperative quantification of femoral head perfusion pressure and waveform utilizing an intracranial pressure monitor.Main outcome measurements:Radiographic union, avascular necrosis, revision surgery.Results:Nineteen patients (8 male, 11 female, average age 56 ± 21 years) with 20 femoral neck fractures were enrolled. Eight fractures were stable (Garden 1-2/OTA B1.1–1.3) and 12 were unstable (Garden 3-4/OTAB2.1–3.3). A waveform was present in 12 of 20 cases. The average pressures were systolic 36.8 mm Hg, diastolic 30.8 mm Hg, pulse pressure 6.0 mm Hg. A perfusion waveform was significantly associated with advanced age (P = 0.02) and accompanied by trend toward stable fracture patterns. There were 4 deaths during the 1-year follow-up period (20%), and there were 5 conversions to total hip arthroplasty (25%). There was no significant association between revision surgery or death with the absence of a waveform.Conclusions:Our study demonstrated the feasibility of a relatively low cost, minimally invasive, technique to quantify femoral head perfusion. In our limited sample, the absence of perfusion did not correlate with our main outcomes; however, the trend toward correlation with increased fracture displacement was as expected. A larger cohort of patients will be needed to detect a significant difference between those with and without a perfusion waveform with regards to our primary outcomes. Further study is needed to delineate the role such data may play in medical decision making at the time of index surgery.Level of Evidence:Prognostic Level II.

Acute femoral fracture does not compromise the outcome of total hip arthroplasty : 5 year results from a single center cohort study in 2,782 patients

National arthroplasty registries reveal a higher risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a femoral neck fracture compared to those with osteoarthritis (OA). Since these registries may con- tain confounding factors, we conducted a single center cohort study comparing survival and reason for failure between THA for an acute femoral neck fracture and OA using the same hip prosthesis after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We retrospectively analyzed 2782 patients who had undergone THA with an Accolade TMZF stem and a Trident cup between March 2009 and September 2014. Primary diagnosis before THA was osteoarthritis (OA group : n=2610) or acute femoral fracture (Fracture group : n=172). Patients in both groups were operated on by the same hip surgeons. Effect of diagnosis on THA survival was analyzed using Cox-regression analysis. Chi-square tests were used to illustrate the different reasons for revision between the groups. Mean follow-up was 4.6 years (2-7.6). A total of 100 revisions were performed. The revision risk was comparable between the OA and Fracture group (HR=1.04, 95% CI :0.46-2.39). No differences were found between the OA and Fracture group with respect to the occurrence of periprosthetic fractures (0.8% vs. 0.6%, p=0.71) and revisions for dislocation (0.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.38). We found no difference in outcome or reason for revision between THA for OA or femoral neck frac- ture. Using an implant with a proven ODEP rating and having experienced hip surgeons carry out the procedures may be more important than the primary diagnosis.

Two year follow up of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundDislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has an incidence of 2–3%. Approximately 77% of dislocations occur within the first year after surgery. The SuperPATH technique is a minimally invasive approach for THA that preserves soft tissue attachments. The purpose of this study is to describe the dislocation rate at 1 year after SuperPATH primary THA.MethodsAll elective primary THAs performed by the senior author using the SuperPATH approach. Exclusion criteria were acute femoral neck fracture, revision surgery, or malignancy. There were 214 of 279 eligible patients available for telephone interviews (76.7%). Medical records were reviewed for secondary outcomes including early and late complications, cup positioning, distance ambulated on postoperative day one, discharge destination, and blood transfusions.ResultsMean age at surgery was 64 ± 10.8 years and mean time to telephone follow up was 773 ± 269.7 days. There were 104 female and 110 male patients. There were zero dislocations reported. Blood transfusions were performed in 3.7% of patients, and 75.7% were discharged to home at an average of 2.3 ± 1.0 days. Cup position averaged 43.6 ± 5.2° abduction and 20.9 ± 6.2° anteversion, with an average leg length discrepancy of 3.6 ± 3.32 mm. Complications included three intraoperative calcar fractures, one periprosthetic femur fracture, one early femoral revision, three superficial infections, and one instance of wound necrosis.ConclusionSuperPATH approach is safe for use in primary THA resulting in a low dislocation rate.

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Femoral Neck Fractures: Who Should Perform the Operation-Adult Reconstructive or Trauma Surgeons?

To compare the results and complications of a large consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for acute femoral neck (FN) fracture by adult reconstructive (AR) and trauma (T) surgeons to determine if there is a difference in outcomes. Retrospective chart review. Level 1 trauma center. One hundred forty-nine consecutive patients who presented to our institution with displaced FN fractures treated by THA were included in this study. All patients were treated with THA. Implant survival, 90-day complications, 90-day readmission, 1-year complications. For the group as a whole, the major surgical complication rate (defined as dislocation, deep infection, loosening, fracture) was significantly higher for T surgeons (20%) than for AR surgeons (7%) (P = 0.021). AR surgeons had significantly less radiographic component malpositioning 12% versus 3% (P = 0.024). Mortality and readmission rates were similar between the 2 cohorts at all time points. Implant survivorship was significantly higher at 1 year for AR surgeons (P = 0.05). THA for acute FN fracture performed by AR surgeons demonstrated higher rates of accurate radiographic component positioning, significantly lower major complication rates at 90 days and 1 year, and greater implant survival at 1 year. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.