Acute Exacerbations Of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Research Articles

The rs6967330 minor allele in CDHR3 is a significant risk factor for severe acute exacerbations in chronic rhinosinusitis

Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are commonly triggered by rhinovirus (RV) infections with secondary bacterial infections. Risk factors for AECRS are not well understood. To determine if carriers of the minor allele rs6967330 (AA/AG) in the Cadherin related family member 3 (CDHR3) gene have an increased risk for RV infections in AECRS in vivo and identify CDHR3 genotype-dependent host responses to RV infection in differentiated nasal airway liquid interface (ALI) cultures ex vivo. We performed a prospective year-long study of adult subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) by rs6967330 genotype (AA/AG, n=16; GG, n=38). We contacted subjects every 2 weeks, and if they reported AECRS clinical data were collected. ALI cultures of adults with CRS (AG/AA,n=19; GG,n=19) were challenged with RV-A and RV-C. We measured viral copy numbers at 4- and 48-hours post-infection and RNA transcriptomes and cytokines at 48 hours post infection. Subjects with the minor allele had significantly higher rates of RV and bacterial infections than those with the major allele. ALI minor allele cultures had higher viral copy numbers of RV-A and RV-C after 48 hours compared to the major allele. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) and pathways identified an upregulation of IL-10 and IL4/13 pathways and a significant downregulation of toll like receptor (TLR) pathways in the minor allele cultures after RV-A and RV-C infection. Unsupervised hierarchical analysis of all DEGs suggest that allergic rhinitis had an additive effect on this response. The rs6967330 minor allele is associated with increased RV-A and RV-C replication, downregulation of TLR-mediated responses and increased T2-type and cytokine and chemokine responses during RV infection.

A cost utility analysis for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis

A cost utility analysis for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis

A prospective longitudinal study assessing the impact of rhinovirus and bacterial infections in acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are thought to arise from common viral infections progressing to secondary bacterial infections. However, the pathophysiology of AECRS remains poorly understood due to a lack of prospective longitudinal studies. We conducted a one-year prospective longitudinal study involving chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) adults. At baseline, we assessed subjective symptom scores using a validated upper respiratory infection questionnaire (WURSS), sinonasal outcome testing scores (SNOT-22), and endoscopic scores (modified Lund-Kennedy score). Every 2weeks, we contacted subjects to collect WURSS and SNOT-22 scores. If WURSS scores were ≥1 and SNOT-22 scores were ≥ 8.9 compared with baseline, subjects underwent an AECRS assessment. We identified rhinovirus (RV) incidence through viral nasal brushings at each visit and bacterial infection through bacterial swabs if mucus scores were ≥1. Thiry-five of 80 CRS subjects reported at least one AECRS episode during the year, predominantly occurring in the fall and winter seasons. RV infections were detected in 8 of 35 cases, bacterial infections in 17 of 35, and co-occurring infections in 7 of 35. All subjects with AECRS visits exhibited significantly higher endoscopic scores compared with baseline. Subjects with co-occurring RV and bacterial infections demonstrated higher disease severity compared with those with either RV or bacterial infection, or no infection. In a one-year prospective longitudinal study involving CRS adults, we identified significant risk factors for AECRS including seasonality and the presence of RV and bacterial infections. These data suggest a standard definition of AECRS and the need to target RV and bacterial infections if we are to help reduce disease severity.

Efficacy of Elexacaftor–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis

PurposeOur work aims to add evidence on the effectiveness of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis. Materials and methodsWe conducted an observational retrospective cohort study at the Cystic Fibrosis Center of a tertiary care hospital to investigate the effect of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis patients, aged 12 or older. The study's endpoints were the change in the occurrence of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis, and the variation of the endoscopic and radiologic findings scored using the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scale, Lund-Mackay, and modified Lund-Mackay radiologic scales, in patients who underwent both pre-treatment and post-treatment examinations. ResultsThe study population comprised 136 patients, of which 28 underwent both pre-treatment and post-treatment nasal endoscopy and 15 had pre- and post-treatment CT scans. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor provided a significant improvement in chronic rhinosinusitis. The mean number of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis per year in the pre-treatment time was 0.55 versus 0.35 during the treatment (p < 0.0021). The Lund-Kennedy scale had a pre-treatment average score of 4.21 points versus 1.5 points after the start of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor (p < 0.0001). The average Lund-Mackay and modified Lund-Mackay scores in the pre-treatment time were respectively 14.6 and 16.45 points; and after the start of the therapy, they became 5.87 and 6.73 (p < 0.0001). ConclusionElexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor was associated with fewer acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis, and a significant improvement of chronic rhinosinusitis evaluated endoscopically and radiologically. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the change in the occurrence of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis in patients affected by cystic fibrosis in therapy with Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor.

A Case of Primary Immunodeficiency Syndrome that was Diagnosed in Adulthood Due to Recurrent Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

A Case of Primary Immunodeficiency Syndrome that was Diagnosed in Adulthood Due to Recurrent Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Efficacy, safety, and tissue penetration of solithromycin in Japanese patients with otorhinolaryngological infections

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy, safety, and tissue penetration of solithromycin for the treatment of otorhinolaryngological infections, we conducted three studies: a tissue penetration study with patients scheduled to undergo otorhinolaryngological tissue removal, an open-label study comprising patients with otitis media, pharyngitis, laryngitis, and tonsillitis, and a non-inferiority study compared with high-dose cefcapene-pivoxil (CFPN-PI). MethodsTissue penetration study; 17 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic otitis media, chronic tonsillitis, or palatine tonsillar hypertrophy, who required resection or removal of their tissue, were enrolled. Solithromycin was administered orally, and otorhinolaryngological tissues were collected 3.5–6 h after drug administration; blood was collected within 15 min before and after drug administration. The collected tissues and blood concentrations were measured at a central laboratory. Open-label study; 55 patients who were diagnosed with acute otitis media, laryngopharyngitis, or tonsillitis were enrolled. Solithromycin was administered orally 800 mg on Day 1, while on days 2–7, 400 mg of the drug was administered once daily. The primary endpoint is the clinical response at Test-of-Cure (TOC: 5–10 days after completion) Non-inferiority study; 283 patients with acute rhinosinusitis or acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis were randomized into either the solithromycin group or CFPN-PI group. Solithromycin was administered 800 mg once daily on Day 1 and 400 mg once daily while on Days 2–7 in solithromycin group, and CFPN-PI was administered 150 mg three times a day while on Days 1–7 in CFPN-PI group. The primary endpoint is the clinical response at TOC. ResultsIn the tissue penetration study, the tissue concentration ratios (tissue concentration/plasma concentration) of solithromycin were 4.19 in the sinonasal mucosa, 1.33 in the middle ear mucosa, and 6.12 in the palatine tonsil tissue. In the open-label study, the efficacy rates at the TOC were 97.0 % for acute otitis media, 100 % for laryngopharyngitis, and 81.8 % for tonsillitis. In the non-inferiority study comprising patients with rhinosinusitis, the efficacy rate at the TOC was 87.7 % for solithromycin and 89.7 % for CFPN-PI. The difference in the efficacy rate (95 % confidence interval) was -2.0 % (-9.4 % to 5.4 %), verifying the non-inferiority of solithromycin to CFPN-PI. The most common adverse events in patients administered solithromycin were diarrhea (20.7 %), nausea and nasopharyngitis (3.6 %,), pharyngitis and elevated hepatic function test results (3.1 %), and abnormal hepatic function (2.1 %). ConclusionBased on the findings, it is suggested that solithromycin is useful for the treatment of otorhinolaryngological infections.

Safety of Antibiotic Irrigations for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Patients with Identical Drug Allergies or Adverse Reactions: A Pilot Study.

Objectives: The use of topical antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) represents a viable option prior to initiation of parenteral antibiotics when no oral antibiotic alternatives are available due to patient allergy or adverse reactions. The main objectives of this pilot study were to determine the safety and efficacy of antibiotic irrigations in the treatment of AECRS in patients with documented adverse reactions to the oral form of the drug. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients diagnosed with AECRS treated with antibiotic irrigations. Inclusion criteria included a documented allergy or adverse event to the systemic form of the same antibiotic. Patient demographics, medical history, prior sinus surgery, nasal endoscopy findings, and microbiology results were obtained. Side effects to the antibiotic irrigations were recorded. Results: Six patients met the inclusion criteria resulting in 7 treated cases of AECRS. Four patients with adverse effects to oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) received TMP/SMZ irrigations, and 1 patient with an adverse reaction to oral ciprofloxacin was treated with ciprofloxacin irrigations. One patient with adverse effects to both oral TMP/SMZ and levofloxacin was treated with TMP/SMZ and levofloxacin irrigations, respectively during 2 separate AECRS episodes. Following treatment, 1 case (14.3%) resulted in complete resolution of infection, 1 (14.3%) had partial improvement, and 5 (71.4%) had minimal to no endoscopic improvement at the subsequent clinic visit. There were no adverse reactions to antibiotic irrigations among the entire cohort. Conclusions: Currently, no prior study has examined whether adverse reactions to a systemic antibiotic also occur when the medication is delivered topically via sinonasal irrigations. Our findings suggest that topical administration of antibiotics may be a safe alternative for patients with adverse effects to the systemic form.

Establishment of a duration criterion for acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis through qualitative analysis of patient experiences.

Establishment of a duration criterion for acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis through qualitative analysis of patient experiences.

Non-Hodkin's lymphoma of the frontal sinus

Primary frontal sinus Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is an extremely rare condition with 20 cases published in the existing literature to date. We describe a 64-year-old patient who presented with right orbital pain, severe headache and diplopia. He was initially diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis and responded well to antibiotic treatment, but his symptoms returned. The diagnosis of frontal sinus NHL was made only after functional endoscopic frontal sinus surgery was performed in general anaesthesia. A tumor mass, which was filling the entire right frontal sinus, was completely removed and sent to histopathological examination. The patient was finally diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the frontal sinus and referred to the haematology department for tumor staging and chemotherapy. This case emphasizes the importance of early clinical suspicion and diagnosis, which leads to early treatment and better prognosis.

LB1581. Exhalation Delivery System with Fluticasone (EDS-FLU) Significantly Reduces Acute Exacerbations and Associated Antibiotic Use in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Abstract Background Data suggest chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) may be the top reason for adult outpatient antibiotic use; of ≈10 million office visits per year for CRS, ≈70% result in antibiotic use. Acute exacerbations of CRS (AECRS) are common, possibly due to persistently impaired mucociliary clearance, and drive use of antibiotics. No drugs have been shown effective for reducing AECRS. ReOpen1 and 2 are randomized controlled trials that evaluated prevention of AECRS with the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE®), a novel device delivering topical steroid into chronically inflamed sinonasal regions not typically accessible with standard nasal sprays (eg, past the nasal valve and above the inferior turbinate). Methods CRS patients were randomized to EDS-FLU one or two sprays per nostril or placebo twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks. Frequency of AECRS, defined as worsening of at least 1 cardinal symptom of CRS (nasal congestion/obstruction, rhinorrhea, facial pain/pressure, hyposmia/anosmia) for ≥ 3 days requiring escalation of medical care (eg, doctor visit, antibiotic or steroid prescription), was analyzed using pooled data from both trials. Results Among 555 patients enrolled, 39.4% were using standard nasal steroids at study entry and 38.8% reported prior sinus surgery. There were 76 AECRS over 24 weeks, almost all (71) resulting in antibiotic use. Patients receiving EDS-FLU had a large reduction in AECRS versus placebo (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.39, P=0.001, vs placebo). Reduction was greater at the higher dose (2 sprays/nostril BID) than the lower dose (1 spray/nostril BID): IRR=0.34, P=0.002; IRR=0.44, P=0.012, respectively. 9.9% of low-dose patients and 7.8% of high-dose patients had ≥ 1 AECRS (20 and 15 events, respectively) vs 15.7% receiving placebo (41 events; P=0.012 and P=0.002 vs placebo, respectively). Treatment was well tolerated: adverse events in ≥ 3% of patients and more common in one active group than placebo were epistaxis, COVID-19, headache, and nasopharyngitis. Conclusion EDS-FLU is the first and only medication shown in randomized controlled trials to significantly reduce acute exacerbations of CRS, offering potential to improve antibiotic stewardship by substantially reducing one of the most common drivers of outpatient antibiotic use. Disclosures Ramy Mahmoud, MD, MPH, OptiNose Inc.: Employee of OptiNose Inc.

Evaluation of empiric antibiotics versus culture-directed therapy in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Evaluation of empiric antibiotics versus culture-directed therapy in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Patient Perspectives on Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Qualitative Study.

Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are currently defined as a transient worsening of symptoms that return to baseline. This definition is narrow and can only be made retrospectively. The literature has studied this phenomenon from the physician perspective, yet a key stakeholder's-the patient's perspective is not well elucidated in the literature. To understand AECRS from the patient's perspective, we performed this study to further clarify this phenomenon. Basic qualitative study via patient interviews using constant comparative methodology was conducted. Tertiary care academic center. Two of the authors served as coders, and via group discussion, a common codebook was created and used to identify recurrent themes. The themes were analyzed for meaning and conclusions were summarized. Ten interviews were conducted with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients. Recurring themes included the following: (1) patients identify with the term flare or sinus infection more than exacerbation; (2) consistent with the current definition, patients identify AECRS by worsening sinonasal symptoms but also relate secondary symptoms, including poor sleep, fatigue, exacerbation of lower respiratory tract symptoms, and malaise to AECRS; and (3) patients are greatly affected by AECRS via decreased quality of life (QOL), worsening of general health, and decreasing productivity. Beyond worsening of sinonasal symptoms, the concept of AECRS reflects a more complex construct to patients with associated extranasal symptoms and systemic manifestations. In addition, AECRS have a large impact on patients, and therefore, understanding this component of CRS is pivotal in improving disease control and QOL in this patient population.

Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis: The current state of knowledge.

ObjectivesAcute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are distinct from baseline symptomatology related to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this review, we seek to examine the literature on AECRS to synthesize the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and impact of AECRS on CRS patients.MethodsA comprehensive narrative review of the scientific literature, identified by searching PubMed from inception through April 2022, was performed.ResultsAECRS is defined in consensus guidelines as a worsening of chronic sinus disease symptomatology, with a return to baseline, typically after intervention with systemic antibiotics and/or corticosteroids. The working definition used across the literature, however, is broad and heterogeneous. The pathophysiology of AECRS is incompletely understood but is hypothesized to include an interplay of environmental and patient‐specific factors. AECRS have been found to have a negative impact on quality‐of‐life measures, independent of baseline CRS symptomatology, and impact how patients and physicians view overall disease control. Treatment for AECRS includes oral antibiotics and systemic corticosteroids, although their efficacy for AECRS is unclear. Appropriate use of medical and surgical treatment for CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS.ConclusionsAECRS are a distinct entity in CRS patients and should be independently assessed when evaluating patients for CRS control. The efficacy of systemic medication usage for AECRS is currently unclear, but appropriate medical management of baseline CRS can reduce the frequency of AECRS. More research is needed to further understand this phenomenon, including a more precise and prospective definition, defined epidemiology, and how to appropriately treat.Level of Evidence5

Disease control in chronic rhinosinusitis: a qualitative study of patient perspectives.

The definition of disease control in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an active area of study. However, investigations have not engaged CRS patients in how they think about disease control. This study seeks to understand the patient perspective on CRS disease control. Qualitative phenomenological study using constant comparative methodology was applied. The research team conducted 10, one-on-one interviews with CRS patients ranging from 22 to 55 minutes in length. The content of the interview protocol was determined through iterative discussion amongst all authors. Two authors served as coders to identify recurrent themes. Themes were analyzed for meaning and conclusions were summarized. Three recurring themes determined from patients were that (1) use of the terminology control adequately represents this phenomenon, (2) components of control could be classified into four main themes relating to CRS symptomatology, exacerbation of comorbid disease, quality of life and acute exacerbations of CRS, and (3) when patients deem their CRS is uncontrolled they are more willing to escalate their treatment to include escalating their daily maintenance regimen, seeking otolaryngology referral, taking rescue medication or undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. CRS patients consider their daily symptoms, the severity and frequency of CRS exacerbations, impact on quality of life as well as exacerbation of comorbid disease when thinking about their disease control. Disease control is a goal of treatment for patients and uncontrolled disease motivates patients to seek further treatment. Physicians should explore all components of CRS control when considering disease status and need for further treatment.

The Microbiology of Acute Exacerbations in Chronic Rhinosinusitis -A Systematic Review.

BackgroundAcute exacerbations (AE) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are a common and important clinical issue. However, relatively little is known regarding the underlying microbiology that drives exacerbations or how it relates to the microbiome of CRS. The purpose of this study is to examine the literature to characterize the microbiome associated with acute exacerbations in a chronic rhinosinusitis setting. Understanding this disease process may facilitate targeted antibiotic therapy, reduced antibiotic resistance, and offer more effective disease control and treatment efficacy.ObjectiveTo characterize the microbiome associated with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS).MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature on Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 1990-June 2021 to identify studies related to AE in CRS. Exclusion criteria include non-English, non-human studies, and case reports. Studies without culture or PCR data were also excluded.ResultsFourteen studies were identified which provided detailed data regarding sinus microbiome in AECRS patients. In these patients, a total of 1252 individual isolates were identified. While common acute pathogens were identified in high frequencies in the sinonasal cultures (Staphylococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenza), the predominant bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Patient characteristics that may represent higher risk phenotypes were not consistently collected in the studies. Discussion of antimicrobial sensitivities and/or resistance were included in 7/14 studies.ConclusionsThis systematic review identifies the predominant microbiology species that may contribute to AECRS. Further studies are needed to understand the pathogenic role of bacteria and viruses in AECRS and to identify associated comorbidities and patient phenotypes that may predispose to AE. The optimal treatment regimen for AECRS remains unclear.

Biofilm and Planktonic Antibiotic Resistance in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

IntroductionThe recalcitrant nature of patients with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) potentially involves persisting colonization of the sinonasal mucosa by bacterial biofilms. Biofilms are known to be highly resistant to antibiotics, which may trigger or maintain chronic inflammation in the sinonasal mucosa. However, little is known about the relationship between the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and antibiofilm concentrations of bacteria obtained from AECRS patients.Material and MethodsThirty bacterial strains from 25 patients with AECRS were identified and underwent MIC determination (VITEK® 2). The planktonic isolates were submitted to an in vitro formation of biofilms (Modified Calgary Biofilm Device) and determination of minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) for amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin. MIC of the planktonic forms was compared with MBIC and MBEC levels, according to the breakpoints established by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.ResultsThe main bacteria retrieved was S. aureus (60%), followed by other Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in lower frequencies. 76.7% of strains formed biofilm in vitro (n=23/30). The planktonic isolates presented high rates of resistance for amoxicillin (82.6%) and clarithromycin (39.1%), and lower rates for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (17.4%). The biofilm-forming bacteria counterparts presented higher levels of MBIC and MBEC compared to the MIC levels for amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and clarithromycin. Levofloxacin was highly effective against both planktonic and biofilm forms. Planktonic resistant forms were associated with levels of antibiofilm concentrations (MBIC and MBEC).ConclusionsBiofilm-forming bacteria from AECRS patients are prevalent, and biofilm forms are highly resistant to antibiotics compared to their planktonic counterparts. Antibiotic resistance observed in planktonic forms is a good indicator of biofilm resistance, although near 20% of susceptible planktonic bacteria can produce antibiotic tolerant biofilms.

Chronic rhinosinusitis: microbiology and treatment of acute exacerbations in patients after endoscopic surgery.

AbstractObjectiveAntibiotics are the mainstay of therapy for acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis. However, no treatment guidelines exist. Most clinicians follow the recommendations for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, usually caused by Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae or Moraxella catarrhalis, and treat with amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate.MethodMedical data of 810 patients who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery were analysed retrospectively. The results of bacterial cultures and treatment course were assessed in 152 patients who presented with acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis within 6 months of endoscopic sinus surgery.ResultsThe most common bacterial species present were Staphylococcus aureus (36 per cent), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13 per cent) and Escherichia coli (11 per cent). Most of the isolates showed resistance or intermediate sensitivity to amoxicillin-clavulanate. Targeted antibiotic therapy was significantly more effective than empiric therapy (71 per cent versus 42 per cent). The most effective antibiotics were fluoroquinolones.ConclusionAcute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis shows different microbiology than acute bacterial rhinosinusitis and requires a different therapeutic approach. It is optimally treated with culture-directed antibiotic therapy.

Impact of type 2 targeting biologics on acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Background: Acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) are associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life. There are sparse data assessing the real-world impact of biologics on AECRS. Objectives: We sought to determine the impact of type 2-targeting biologics on the frequency of medication use for AECRS episodes. Methods: Antibiotic and/or systemic corticosteroid courses for AECRS were identified in a retrospective study from November 2015 to February 2020, at a single academic health system. The estimated yearly rates for antibiotic and corticosteroid courses were evaluated before and after initiation of type 2 biologics. Results: One-hundred and sixty-five patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) had received either omalizumab (n = 12), mepolizumab (n = 42), benralizumab (n = 44), dupilumab (n = 61), or reslizumab (n = 6). Seventy percent had CRS with nasal polyps, and 30% had CRS without nasal polyps. All the patients had asthma. When all the biologics were combined, the estimated yearly rate for antibiotics for AECRS decreased from 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.59) to 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52-0.88) with biologic use (49% reduction, p < 0.001). Those with frequent AECRS (three or more courses of antibiotics in the 1 year before biologic use) had a larger degree of reduction, with an estimated yearly rate of 4.15 (95% CI, 3.79-4.55) to 1.58 (95% CI, 1.06-2.35) with biologic use (n = 27; 62% reduction; p < 0.001). Within the total cohort, the estimated yearly rate for systemic corticosteroids for AECRS decreased from 1.69 (95% CI, 1.42-2.02) to 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.88) with biologic use (60% reduction; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Type 2-targeting biologics reduced medication use for AECRS. This suggested that biologics may be a therapeutic option for patients with frequent AECRS.

Annual trends in Google searches provides insights related to rhinosinusitis exacerbations

PurposeTemporal trends of disease-specific internet searches may provide novel insights into seasonal dynamics of disease burden and, by extension, disease pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to define the temporal trends in rhinosinusitis-specific internet searches.MethodsThis was a cross sectional analysis of search volume for predefined search terms. Google trends was used to explore the volume of searches for five specific search terms related to rhinosinusitis: nose, mucus, sinus, sinusitis, chronic sinusitis, which were entered into Google web search between 2004 and 2019. Results were analyzed within search “context” which included temporally associated related searches. Relative search volume (RSV) was analyzed for English and non-English speaking countries from the Northern and Southern hemispheres. Analysis of seasonality was performed using the cosinor model.ResultsThe five specific search terms were most related to rhinosinusitis-related search contexts, indicating that they were appropriately reflective of internet queries by patients for rhinosinusitis. The RSV for rhinosinusitis-related terms and more general search terms increased with each passing year indicating constant interest in rhinosinusitis. Cosinor time series analysis revealed inquiry peaks in winter months for all five specific rhinosinusitis-related search terms independent from the hemisphere.ConclusionOver a 15-year period, Google searches with rhinosinusitis-specific search terms consistently peaked during the winter around the world. These findings indirectly support the model of viral infection or exposure as the predominant cause of acute rhinosinusitis and acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis.

The bacteriology of recurrent acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis: a longitudinal analysis.

The purpose of this study was to describe the microbiology of recurrent acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis over time. Retrospective review of patients with recurrent acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent endoscopic-guided cultures during acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis. 386 cultures were obtained from 112 patients during recurrent acute exacerbations of CRS. A change of bacterial isolates during the course of recurrent exacerbations was observed in 68% (76/112) of patients, necessitating a change of treatment in 40% (45/112). The main risk factor for the subsequent change in cultures was polymicrobial growth. Sinus surgery was not associated with subsequent change in cultured isolates. Resistant strains developed in 11.6% (13/112) of patients, of whom those with abnormal mucociliary clearance being at the highest risk. Repeated middle meatal cultures should be considered in patients with recurrent exacerbations of CRS, particularly in cases not responding to standard therapy.