Abstract Introduction Dyslipidaemia is an important correctable risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Many studies have confirmed that the lower the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are, the lower is the CAD morbidity and mortality rates (1). However, many patients who achieved low levels of LDL-C still experience a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) because of the other residual risk factors. Therefore, there is a constant need for better stratification of patients who are at higher risk for novel MACE following their first acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Evidence increasingly suggests that the ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C might be a new and better marker of cardiovascular disease, as it simultaneously evaluates the levels of both LDL-C and HDL-C (2). Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the prediction value of LDL-C/HDL-C ratio for long term prognosis after ACS as well as its correlation with CAD severity. Methods We included patients hospitalized at out centre with ACS from January 2017 to January 2024. Demographic data, data on LDL-C and HDL-C levels on admission and calculated Syntax score were used. Syntax score is a comprehensive angiographic scoring system which determines complexity by using coronary anatomy and lesion characteristics (3). Follow-up data were collected either by clinical follow-up visits or by telephone interviews. The MACE was defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome and need for elective or urgent percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Results This registry-based study included 2471 patients with ACS, median age of 64 (interquartile range 56-73) years, 31% female. Total of 1099 patients (44%) had non-ST elevation ACS and 1372 (54%) had ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Median Syntax score was 13 (IQR 7-20.5), with 1494 (61%) patients having low Syntax score (≤16), 508 (21%) patients medium (16-22), and 448 (18%) high score (>22), respectively. Median follow up was 17 (3-27) months. LDL-C/HDL-C ratio correlated significantly with cardiovascular death, with weak coefficient (2.94 vs. 2.54 p<0.001; rho=0.102, p<.0001), however did not correlate with MACE (2.88 vs. 2.92, p=0.188, rho=0.06, p=0.77). This remained identical when tested for patients with STEMI and non-STE ACS. In addition, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio did not correlate with CAD severity as assessed with Syntax score (low 2.92 vs. medium 2.83 vs. high 2.86, p=0.597; rho=0.4, p=0.09). Conclusion Our data suggest that LDL-C/HDL-C ratio cannot be used as a relevant predictor of post-ACS long-term MACE or cardiovascular death, nor it can be correlated with CAD severity. Further studies are needed to establish the real value of LDL-C/HDL-C ratio as a post-ACS predictor.
Read full abstract