Acute Catheterization And Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial Research Articles

Safety and efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with positive biomarkers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy trial

There are limited data on bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) with positive biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (troponin and/or creatine kinase-myocardial band isoenzyme). We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy in patients with positive biomarkers from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. We compared the net adverse clinical events [composite ischemia - (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned ischemic revascularization) - or noncoronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)-related major bleeding] among patients with biomarker-positive NSTE-ACS in the ACUITY trial overall and by antithrombotic strategy. Among 13 819 patients with NSTE-ACS enrolled in ACUITY, 4728 patients presented with positive biomarkers and underwent an early invasive strategy. Of those, 1547 were randomized to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), 1555 to bivalirudin plus GPI, and 1626 to bivalirudin monotherapy. Compared with biomarker-negative patients, biomarker-positive patients had higher 30-day rates of net adverse clinical events (14.0 vs. 12.4%; P = 0.04), all-cause death (1.3 vs. 0.5%; P = 0.001), cardiac death (1.1 vs. 0.5%; P = 0.005), and non-CABG-related major bleeding (6.5 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.03). At 30 days, bivalirudin monotherapy was associated with significantly less non-CABG-related major bleeding (bivalirudin monotherapy 4.1% vs. bivalirudin plus GPI 8.4% vs. heparin plus GPI 7.1%) with comparable rates of composite ischemia (bivalirudin monotherapy 9.2% vs. bivalirudin plus GPI 9.9% vs. heparin plus GPI 8.4%). In a multivariable model, bivalirudin monotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in non-CABG-related major bleeding but was not associated with an increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization or stent thrombosis. Compared with heparin plus GPI or bivalirudin plus GPI, bivalirudin monotherapy provides similar protection from ischemic events with less major bleeding at 30 days among patients with NSTE-ACS and positive biomarkers.

Bleeding Events Before Coronary Angiography in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

BackgroundUpstream administration of antithrombotic drugs to patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes before coronary angiography is a common practice despite an incomplete understanding of the risks and benefits. ObjectivesThe authors analyzed the incidence of bleeding and ischemic events occurring before angiography and assessed their association with antithrombotic drugs and mortality risk. MethodsAll patients from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial with planned angiography after enrollment were included. Bleeding events were classified according to the ACUITY scale as major or nonmajor bleeding. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed. ResultsOf 13,726 patients, 275 (2.0%) bled before angiography, including 52 (0.4%) with major bleeding. Forty-four (0.3%) experienced myocardial infarction. The median time from randomization to coronary angiography was 4.5 h (interquartile ratio [IQR]: 1.7 to 19.7 h) for patients who did not bleed while waiting for angiography and 27.9 h (IQR: 21.9 to 65.6 h) for patients who bled while waiting for angiography (p < 0.001). Bleeding events accrued linearly over time, reaching 10.4% at 96 h post-randomization. Independent predictors of bleeding before angiography included age (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03 per year of age; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.04; p < 0.001), renal insufficiency (adjusted HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.04; p = 0.02), and use of multiple antithrombotic drugs (adjusted HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.56; p < 0.001). Bleeding before coronary angiography was associated with longer hospitalization (4.8 days [IQR: 3.0 to 8.9 days] vs. 3.0 days [IQR: 1.9 to 5.9 days]; p < 0.001). Patients who bled before angiography were more likely to die within 1 year than patients who did not bleed (8.5% vs. 4.1%; p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 1.89 (95% CI: 1.23 to 2.90; p = 0.004). ConclusionsUpstream antithrombotic treatment of patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes awaiting coronary angiography is associated with excess bleeding with mortality implications. Bleeding avoidance strategies before angiogram, including early angiography, may negate the need to prolong upstream antithrombotic treatment and improve the overall risk-benefit balance for these patients. (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy [ACUITY]; NCT00093158)

Effect of Anemia on Frequency of Short- and Long-Term Clinical Events in Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy Trial)

There are limited data on the impact of anemia on clinical outcomes in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with an early invasive strategy. We sought to determine the short- and long-term clinical events among patients with and without anemia enrolled in the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial. Anemia was defined as baseline hemoglobin of <13g/dl for men and <12g/dl for women. The primary end points were composite ischemia (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization for ischemia) and major bleeding assessed in-hospital, at 1 month, and at 1 year. Among the 13,819 patients in the ACUITY trial, information regarding anemia was available in 13,032 (94.3%), 2,199 of whom (16.9%) had anemia. Patients with anemia compared with those without anemia had significantly increased adverse event rates in-hospital (composite ischemia 6.6% vs 4.8%, p= 0.0004; major bleeding 7.3% vs 3.3%, p<0.0001), at 1 month (composite ischemia 10% vs 7.2%, p <0.0001, major bleeding 8.8% vs 3.9%, p <0.0001), and 1 year (composite ischemia 21.7% vs 15.3%, p <0.0001). Anemia was an independent predictor of death at 1 year (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29 to 2.44, p= 0.0005). Composite ischemia was significantly more common among patients who developed in-hospital non-coronary artery bypass surgery major bleeding compared with those who did not (anemic patients 1-year relative risk 2.19, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.88, p <0.0001; nonanemic patients relative risk 2.16, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.65, p <0.0001). In conclusion, in the ACUITY trial, baseline anemia was strongly associated with adverse earlyand late clinical events, especially in those who developed major bleeding.

Impact of Cigarette Smoking on Extent of Coronary Artery Disease and Prognosis of Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Analysis From the ACUITY Trial (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy)

This study sought to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes for smokers with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Smoking has been associated with the "paradox" of reduced mortality after acute myocardial infarction (MI). This is thought to be due to favorable baseline characteristics and less diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) among smokers. In the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial, 13,819 patients (29.1% smokers) with moderate- to high-risk NSTE-ACS underwent angiography and, if indicated, revascularization. Smokers were significantly younger and had fewer comorbidities than nonsmokers. Incidence of death and MI were comparable at 30 days, although smokers had significantly reduced risks of 30-day major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67 to 0.96; p = 0.016) and 1-year mortality (HR: 0.797, 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.97; p = 0.027). After correction for baseline and clinical differences, smoking was no longer predictive of major bleeding (odds ratio: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.32; p = 0.56) and was associated with higher 1-year mortality (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.7; p = 0.013). This pattern of reversed risk after multivariable correction held true for those smokers requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. Core laboratory angiographic analysis showed that smokers and nonsmokers were comparable in terms of the extent of CAD, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow, myocardial blush, and the presence of thrombi. In contrast to the paradox previously described in ST-segment elevation MI, our analysis finds smoking to be an independent predictor of higher 1-year mortality in patients presenting with NSTE-ACS, and our angiographic study demonstrates CAD in smokers that is comparable to that in nonsmokers but evident ∼1 decade earlier. (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy [ACUITY]; NCT00093158).

Impact of Nonculprit Vessel Myocardial Perfusion on Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Analysis From the ACUITY Trial (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy)

This study evaluated the impact of nonculprit vessel myocardial perfusion on outcomes of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) patients. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients have decreased perfusion in areas remote from the infarct-related vessel. The impact of myocardial hypoperfusion of regions supplied by nonculprit vessels in NSTE-ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. The angiographic substudy of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial included 6,921 NSTE-ACS patients. Complete 3-vessel assessments of baseline coronary TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade and myocardial blush grade (MBG) were performed. We examined the outcomes of PCI-treated patients according to the worst nonculprit vessel MBG identified per patient. Among the 3,826 patients treated with PCI, the worst nonculprit MBG was determined in3,426 (89.5%) patients, including 375 (10.9%) MBG 0/1 patients, 475 (13.9%) MBG 2 patients, and 2,576 (75.2%) MBG 3 patients. Nonculprit MBG 0/1 was associated with worse baseline clinical characteristics. Patients with nonculprit MBG 0/1 versus MBG 3 had increased rates of 30-day (3.0% vs.0.7%, p < 0.0001) and 1-year (4.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.0001) death. Similar results were found among patients with pre-procedural TIMI flow grade 3 in the culprit vessel, where nonculprit vessel MBG 0/1 (hazard ratio: 2.81 [95% confidence interval: 1.63 to 4.84], p= 0.0002) was the strongest predictor of 1-year mortality. Reduced myocardial perfusion in an area supplied by a nonculprit vessel is associated with increased short- and long-term mortality rates in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI. Furthermore, worst nonculprit MBG is able to risk-stratify patients with normal baseline flow of the culprit vessel.

Comparative effectiveness of upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with moderate- and high-risk acute coronary syndromes: An Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) substudy

Tirofiban and eptifibatide are both small-molecule, competitive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPIs) that are guideline-supported for upstream therapy in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety of tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients with ACS. Within the ACUITY trial, 4,323 patients with moderate- and high-risk ACS received upstream, adjunctive GPI (tirofiban or eptifibatide) in addition to an antithrombin. Primary outcomes included 30-day rates of composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major bleeding (not related to coronary artery bypass grafting), and composite net adverse clinical events (NACE). The outcomes were compared based on the upstream GPI administered. There were significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients treated with tirofiban vs eptifibatide, particularly related to country/region. In unadjusted analyses, treatment with upstream tirofiban vs eptifibatide was associated with similar rates of major bleeding (5.8% vs 6.5%, P = .39) and nonsignificantly lower rates of MACE (6.1% vs 7.6%, P = .06) and NACE (10.6% vs 12.6%, P = .06). After propensity-based multivariable adjustment, there were no significant differences between tirofiban and eptifibatide with respect to 30-day major bleeding, MACE, or NACE. Among more than 4,000 patients with moderate- and high-risk ACS treated with upstream GPI as part of an early invasive management strategy, the use of tirofiban and eptifibatide resulted in similar clinical outcomes. These data suggest equivalence of these 2 agents for upstream use, while highlighting some of the difficulties of nonrandomized comparative effectiveness analyses, specifically the difficulty in addressing geographic differences in the use of nonrandomized treatments.

TCT-57 Impact Of Coronary Artery Calcification On Clinical Events In Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Analysis From The ACUITY (Acute Catheterization And Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial

TCT-57 Impact Of Coronary Artery Calcification On Clinical Events In Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Analysis From The ACUITY (Acute Catheterization And Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial

Prediction of 1-Year Mortality in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Validation of the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score

This study sought to validate the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), in order to further legitimize its clinical application. The Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score allows for an individualized prediction of 1-year mortality in patients undergoing contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. It is composed of a "Core" Model (anatomical SYNTAX score, age, creatinine clearance, and left ventricular ejection fraction), and "Extended" Model (composed of an additional 6 clinical variables), and has previously been cross validated in 7 contemporary stent trials (>6,000 patients). One-year all-cause death was analyzed in 2,627 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. Mortality predictions from the Core and Extended Models were studied with respect to discrimination, that is, separation of those with and without 1-year all-cause death (assessed by the concordance [C] statistic), and calibration, that is, agreement between observed and predicted outcomes (assessed with validation plots). Decision curve analyses, which weight the harms (false positives) against benefits (true positives) of using a risk score to make mortality predictions, were undertaken to assess clinical usefulness. In the ACUITY trial, the median SYNTAX score was 9.0 (interquartile range 5.0 to 16.0); approximately 40% of patients had 3-vessel disease, 29% diabetes, and 85% underwent drug-eluting stent implantation. Validation plots confirmed agreement between observed and predicted mortality. The Core and Extended Models demonstrated substantial improvements in the discriminative ability for 1-year all-cause death compared with the anatomical SYNTAX score in isolation (C-statistics: SYNTAX score: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56 to 0.71; Core Model: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.79; Extended Model: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.83). Decision curve analyses confirmed the increasing ability to correctly identify patients who would die at 1 year with the Extended Model versus the Core Model versus the anatomical SYNTAX score, over a wide range of thresholds for mortality risk predictions. Compared to the anatomical SYNTAX score alone, the Core and Extended Models of the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score more accurately predicted individual 1-year mortality in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. These findings support the clinical application of the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score.

A New Score for Risk Stratification of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The ACUITY-PCI (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy–Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) Risk Score

This study sought to develop a new score specific for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (the ACUITY-PCI [Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention] risk score). The TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) and GRACE (Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events) risk scores are recommended for risk stratification of patients with NSTEACS. However, these scores were not optimized for patients undergoing an early invasive strategy with PCI. The ACUITY-PCI risk score was created from data for 1,692 patients enrolled in the formal angiographic substudy of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial by integrating clinical, angiographic, laboratory, and electrocardiographic variables selected by multivariable analysis. The score was subsequently validated in a different population of 846 patients and compared with the GRACE and TIMI risk scores, and the SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) and Clinical SYNTAX scores. Six variables (2 clinical, 1 laboratory/electrocardiographic, and 3 angiographic) were included in the ACUITY-PCI score: insulin-treated diabetes; renal insufficiency; baseline cardiac biomarker elevation or ST-segment deviation; bifurcation lesion; small vessel/diffuse coronary artery disease; and the extent of coronary artery disease. Event rates increased significantly across tertiles of ACUITY-PCI score. Compared with the other scores, the ACUITY-PCI score had the best discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic), and index of separation. Moreover, the net reclassification improvement varied from 9% to 38% and the integrated discrimination index from 1.9% to 2.7%. The ACUITY-PCI risk score is a new tool integrating clinical, angiographic, and laboratory/electrocardiographic variables specifically developed for patients with NSTEACS undergoing PCI. This score displayed better prognostic accuracy in terms of discrimination and calibration than other currently available scores for risk stratification of patients with NSTEACS. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACS]; NCT00093158).

Outcomes of Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Acute Coronary Syndromes: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial

This study sought to assess the contemporary outcomes of patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) who present with moderate and high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and are treated with an early invasive strategy and contemporary antithrombin regimens. The prognosis of patients with ACS and prior CABG in relation to triage strategy and contemporary antithrombotic regimens is unknown. In the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial, 2,475 of 13,764 patients (18.0%) with ACS managed with an early invasive strategy had previously undergone CABG. Their outcomes were examined according to treatment and randomized antithrombin regimen. Prior CABG was associated with older age, more frequent comorbidities, higher Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with versus without prior CABG were less likely to undergo (repeat) CABG and were more likely to be managed medically. At 1 year, patients with versus without prior CABG had higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (22.5% vs. 15.2%, p < 0.0001) due to greater mortality (5.4% vs. 3.9%, p < 0.0001), myocardial infarction (10.0% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.0001), and unplanned revascularization (13.1% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.0001). History of CABG was an independent predictor of MACE. The 1-year MACE rates were not significantly different after randomization to bivalirudin versus heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (odds ratio: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 1.70). Despite the progress in the treatment of coronary artery disease, patients with prior CABG and ACS have a poor prognosis, substantially worse than for those without prior CABG. Whereas bivalirudin monotherapy was an acceptable treatment for these patients, it did not improve their prognoses.

Intraprocedural Thrombotic Events During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Are Associated With Adverse Outcomes: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of intraprocedural thrombotic events (IPTE) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Ischemic complications of PCI are infrequent but prognostically important. How often these events are a consequence of intraprocedural complications is unknown, with only limited data assessing the occurrence and importance of IPTE. A total of 3,428 patients who underwent PCI for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial underwent detailed frame-by-frame core laboratory angiographic analysis. An IPTE, defined as the development of new or increasing thrombus, abrupt vessel closure, no reflow, slow reflow, or distal embolization at any time during the procedure, occurred in 121 patients (3.5%). Patients with IPTE had higher in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year major adverse cardiac event rates than patients without IPTE (25.6% vs. 6.3% in-hospital, 30.6% vs. 9.3% at 30 days, and 37.0% vs. 20.5% at 1 year; p < 0.0001 for each). An IPTE was strongly associated with Q-wave myocardial infarction and out-of-laboratory definite/probable stent thrombosis (in-hospital 3.3% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.006; 30 days 5.8% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.0001; and 1 year 6.7% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.0002). Unplanned revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding not associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery were also increased among patients with IPTE, as was overall 30-day mortality (3.3% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.002). Moreover, IPTE was an independent predictor of 30-day and 1-year composite death/myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events. Although infrequent among patients undergoing early PCI for moderate and high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, IPTE was strongly associated with subsequent adverse outcomes including death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.

Quantification and Impact of Untreated Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score

The purpose of this study was to quantify the extent and complexity of residual coronary stenoses following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to evaluate its impact on adverse ischemic outcomes. Incomplete revascularization (IR) after PCI is common, and most studies have suggested that IR is associated with a worse prognosis compared with complete revascularization (CR). However, formal quantification of the extent and complexity of residual atherosclerosis after PCI has not been performed. The baseline Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (bSS) from 2,686 angiograms from patients with moderate- and high-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI enrolled in the prospective ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial was determined. The SS after PCI was also assessed, generating the “residual” SS (rSS). Patients with rSS >0 were defined as having IR and were stratified by rSS tertiles, and their outcomes were compared to the CR group. The bSS was 12.8 ± 6.7, and after PCI the rSS was 5.6 ± 2.2. Following PCI, 1,084 patients (40.4%) had rSS = 0 (CR), 523 (19.5%) had rSS >0 but ≤2, 578 (21.5%) had rSS >2 but ≤8, and 501 patients (18.7%) had rSS >8. Age, insulin-treated diabetes, hypertension, smoking, elevated biomarkers or ST-segment deviation, and lower ejection fraction were more frequent in patients with IR compared with CR. The 30-day and 1-year rates of ischemic events were significantly higher in the IR group compared with the CR group, especially those with high rSS. By multivariable analysis, rSS was a strong independent predictor of all ischemic outcomes at 1 year, including all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 1.09, p = 0.006). The rSS is useful to quantify and risk-stratify the degree and complexity of residual stenosis after PCI. Specifically, rSS >8.0 after PCI in patients with moderate- and high-risk ACS is associated with a poor 30-day and 1-year prognosis. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT00093158)

Comparison of clinical and angiographic prognostic risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY (ACUITY) trial

Several prognostic risk scores have been developed for patients with coronary artery disease, but their comparative use in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been examined. We therefore investigated the accuracy of the Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score, Clinical Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score (CSS), New Risk Stratification (NERS) score (NERS), Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score, Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score for risk assessment of 1-year mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis in patients with NSTEACS undergoing PCI. The 6 scores were determined in 2,094 patients with NSTEACS treated with PCI enrolled in the angiographic substudy of the ACUITY trial. The prognostic accuracy of the 6 scores was assessed using the c statistic for discrimination and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration. The index of separation and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were also determined. Scores incorporating clinical and angiographic variables (CSS and NERS) showed the best tradeoff between discrimination and calibration for most end points, with the best discrimination for all end points and good calibration for most of them. The CSS had the best index of separation for most ischemic endpoints and displayed an NRI for cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) compared to the other scores, whereas NERS displayed an NRI for all-cause death and target vessel revascularization. The 3 scores-CSS, NERS, and SYNTAX-were the only scores to have both good discrimination and calibration for cardiac mortality. In patients with NSTEACS undergoing PCI, risk scores incorporating clinical and angiographic variables had the highest predictive accuracy for a broad spectrum of ischemic end points.

Prognostic Significance of Elevated Baseline Troponin in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Chronic Kidney Disease Treated With Different Antithrombotic Regimens

Elevation of baseline cardiac troponin in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) confers an adverse prognosis. The prognostic value of troponin elevation in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ACS is less certain. In the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategy) trial, 13 819 patients with moderate and high-risk ACS were assigned randomly to receive heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), bivalirudin plus a GPI, or bivalirudin monotherapy. Among 2179 patients with CKD (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min), baseline troponin elevation was present in 1291 patients (59.2%). Major bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction (MI), or unplanned revascularization, were examined according to baseline troponin status and randomization arm. Patients with CKD in whom the baseline troponin level was elevated had significantly higher rates of death, MI, and MACE at 30 days and 1 year compared with CKD patients without elevated baseline troponin. By multivariable analysis, baseline troponin elevation in patients with CKD was an independent predictor of composite death or MI at 30 days (hazard ratio [95% CI]=2.05 [1.48, 2.83], P<0.0001) and 1 year (1.72 [1.36, 2.17], P<0.0001). In CKD patients with baseline troponin elevation, bivalirudin monotherapy compared with heparin plus a GPI significantly reduced the 30-day rates of major bleeding with nonsignificantly different rates of MACE at 30 days and 1 year. In patients with ACS and CKD, baseline troponin elevation is associated with significantly worse short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Bivalirudin monotherapy safely reduces major bleeding in ACS patients with CKD and baseline troponin elevation. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00093158.

Prognostic Significance of Coronary Thrombus in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Subanalysis of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial

The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence and clinical implications of thrombus on baseline angiography among patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Given current advances in the pharmacological and mechanical treatment of ACS patients managed with an early invasive strategy, the incidence and prognostic importance of pre-procedural lesion thrombus is warranted. In the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial, a total of 3,627 patients with moderate- and high-risk ACS undergoing PCI had their baseline and final post-PCI angiograms analyzed by an independent angiographic core laboratory. Patients with thrombus (n = 530 [15%]) compared with those without thrombus had higher rates of impaired final epicardial coronary flow (final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3: 89.6% vs. 97.1%, p < 0.0001). Thrombus was an independent predictor of 30 day death (odds ratio [OR]: 3.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20 to 8.37], p = 0.02), and myocardial infarction (MI) at 30 days (OR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.17 to 2.24], p = 0.003) and at 1 year (OR: 1.56 [95% CI: 1.16 to 2.08], p = 0.003). Patients with thrombus had significantly higher rates of stent thrombosis (ST) compared with patients without thrombus at 30 days (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.002) and at 1 year (3.7% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.003), and thrombus was an independent predictor of ST at both 30 days (OR: 2.61 [95% CI: 1.38 to 4.91]) and 1 year (OR: 2.98 [95% CI: 1.64 to 5.42]). Pre-procedural thrombus was present in 15% of moderate- and high-risk ACS patients undergoing PCI in the ACUITY trial. Baseline thrombus predicts increased ischemic complications at 30 days including a 3-fold increased risk of death as well as MI up to 1 year. Further evaluation of adjunctive pharmacotherapy is needed in this high-risk population.

Prognostic Value of the SYNTAX Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) Trial

We sought to investigate the predictive value of the SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score (SS) for risk assessment of 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the SYNTAX trial, the SS was effective in risk-stratifying patients with left main and triple-vessel coronary disease, the majority of whom had stable ischemic heart disease. The SS was determined in 2,627 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI in the angiographic substudy of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) trial. Patients were stratified according to tertiles of the SS: <7 (n = 854), ≥ 7 and <13 (n = 825), and ≥ 13 (n = 948). Among patients in the first, second, and third SS tertiles, the 1-year rates of mortality were 1.5%, 1.6%, and 4.0%, respectively (p = 0.0005); the cardiac mortality rates were 0.2%, 0.9%, and 2.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001); the myocardial infarction (MI) rates were 6.3%, 8.3%, and 12.9%, respectively (p < 0.0001); and the target vessel revascularization (TVR) rates were 7.4%, 7.0%, and 9.8%, respectively (p = 0.02). By multivariable analysis, the SS was an independent predictor of 1-year death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.07; p = 0.005), cardiac death (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.09; p = 0.0002), MI (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05; p < 0.0001), and TVR (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.05; p < 0.0001). The SS affected death, cardiac death, and MI both within the first 30 days after PCI and between 30 days and 1 year, whereas it affected TVR primarily within the first 30 days. The predictive value of an increased SS was consistent among multiple pre-specified subgroups. In patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI, the SS is an independent predictor of the 1-year rates of death, cardiac death, MI, and TVR. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACS]; NCT00093158).

Impact of Delay to Angioplasty in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial

Impact of Delay to Angioplasty in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial

Impact of Delay to Angioplasty in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial

Impact of Delay to Angioplasty in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) Trial

The Time Dependence of Antithrombin Initiation in Patients With Non–ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Subgroup Analysis From the ACUITY Trial

Antithrombins are among standard treatment agents for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. We aimed to determine the association between time from emergency department (ED) presentation to treatment with an antithrombin and adverse cardiac events. The study cohort was a subgroup of the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial, enrolled from March 1, 2005, to December 5, 2005. The ACUITY trial enrolled patients with moderate- and high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and who were undergoing an early invasive strategy (<72 hours from randomization). All patients received an antithrombin (unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, or bivalirudin), in addition to other agents. A formal ED case report form was introduced in March 2005. Time from presentation to antithrombin initiation was evaluated as a continuous variable in hours. The endpoints were defined as major ischemic events (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization) or major bleeding within 30 days, or inhospital major bleeding. Logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics, severity of disease, comorbidities, and treatment differences. Of the 2,722 patients enrolled with an ED case report form, complete time data were available in 2,632 (96%). Median time to antithrombin administration was 4.87 hours (interquartile range 2.67 to 9.83). After multivariable analysis, there was no association of major ischemic events with log time (hours) to antithrombin treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97 to 1.01). There was an increase in major bleeding at 30 days and inhospital major bleeding complications with longer log time (hours) to antithrombin initiation (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.80; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.83, respectively). In this study of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who were undergoing an early invasive management strategy, we were unable to demonstrate an association between adverse ischemic outcomes with the timing of antithrombin administration. However, there was an increase in bleeding outcomes as time to antithrombin administration increased.

Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization for Multivessel Disease in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Analysis From the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) Trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with moderate- and high-risk acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and multivessel coronary artery disease managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There is uncertainty about the preferred revascularization strategy for high-risk patients with multivessel disease. Among 13,819 moderate- and high-risk ACS patients enrolled in the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial, 5,627 had multivessel disease (including left anterior descending artery involvement) and were managed by PCI (n = 4,412) or CABG (n = 1,215). Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for differences in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, yielding a total of 1,056 patients (528 managed by PCI, and 528 managed by CABG). Propensity-matched patients undergoing CABG had higher 1-month rates of stroke (1.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03) and myocardial infarction (13.3% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.03), received more blood transfusions (40.3% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.0001) and more frequently developed acute renal injury (31.7% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.0001), whereas PCI was associated with higher rates of unplanned revascularization at both 1 month and at 1 year (0.8% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.0001; and 3.8% vs. 16.5%, p < 0.0001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the CABG and PCI groups in 1-month or 1-year mortality (2.5% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.69; and 4.4% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.58, respectively). In this propensity-matched comparison from the ACUITY trial, moderate- and high-risk patients with ACS and multivessel disease treated with PCI rather than CABG had lower rates of peri-procedural stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and renal injury, with comparable 1-month and 1-year rates of mortality, but more frequently developed recurrent ischemia requiring repeat revascularization procedures during follow-up. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes [ACS]; NCT00093158).