Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Research Articles

Endovascular treatment of embolism-related acute basilar artery occlusion stroke: ADAPT versus stent retriever thrombectomy.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a direct aspiration first-pass technique (ADAPT) and stent retriever thrombectomy (SRT) technique in embolism-related acute basilar artery occlusion (EMB-ABAO). We collected data from patients with EMB-ABAO in multiple stroke centers from January 2017 to February 2024. We defined two groups of enrolled patients, the ADAPT group and the SRT group. The primary outcome was the first attempt recanalization (FAR) rate. Secondary outcomes were the puncture to recanalization (PTR) time and the 90-day favorable functional outcome. The safety outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality rate. A total of 406 patients were screened for endovascular treatment (EVT) of ABAO ischemic stroke, and 108 patients were identified with EMB-ABAO stroke. Among these, 96 patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 58 (60.42%) were in the ADAPT group, and 38 (39.58%) were in the SRT group. Compared with the SRT group, the ADAPT group achieved FAR more frequently (60.34% versus 39.47%; p = 0.045) and a higher 90-day favorable functional outcome rate (44.83% versus 36.84%; p = 0.438). The median PTR time of the ADAPT group was significantly shorter than that of the SRT group (42 versus 105 min; p < 0.001). In cases where EMB-ABAO is suspected, ADAPT was superior to SRT in terms of FAR rate and PTR time, but the 90-day mRS scores had no statistical significance. Given the reduced time to recanalization with ADAPT, an initial attempt at recanalization with ADAPT may be necessary before stent retriever. However, due to the study limitations, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and require further study.

Aspiration only versus stent retriever only thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: a propensity score-matched analysis of the German Stroke Registry

BackgroundEndovascular treatment has become the standard care for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Uncertainty persists about the optimal thrombectomy technique.ObjectiveTo compare aspiration thrombectomy with stent retriever thrombectomy in patients with...

Outcome of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.

Introduction Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) has been identified as a major cause of acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO).This study compared the characteristics and treatment outcomes in acute BAO patients with and without ICAD. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted at 115 People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam from August 2021 to June 2023. Patients with acute BAO who underwent endovascular treatment within 24 hours from symptom onset were included (thrombectomy alone or bridging with intravenous alteplase). The baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and compared between patients with and without ICAD. Good functional outcome was defined as mRS ≤ 3 at 90 days. Results Among the 208 patients enrolled, 112 (53.8%) patients were categorized in the ICAD group, and 96 (46.2%) in the non-ICAD group. Occlusion in the proximal segment of the basilar artery was more common in patients with ICAD (55.4% vs 21.9%, p &lt; 0.001), whereas the distal segment was the most common location in the non-ICAD group (58.3% vs 10.7%, p &lt; 0.001). Patients in the ICAD group were more likely to undergo treatment in the late window, with a higher mean onset-to-treatment time compared to the non-ICAD group (11.6 vs. 9.5 hours, p=0.01). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, distal segment basilar artery occlusion was negatively associated with ICAD (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.32, p &lt; 0.001), while dyslipidemia showed a positive association (aOR 2.44, 95% CI 1.15 - 5.17, p = 0.02).There was a higher rate for rescue stenting in the ICAD compared to non-ICAD group (15.2% vs. 0%, p&lt;0.001). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of good outcome (45.5% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.91), symptomatic hemorrhage rates (4.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.25), and mortality (42% vs. 50%, p = 0.25). Conclusion ICAD was a common etiology in patients with BAO. The location segment of basilar artery occlusion and dyslipidemia were associated with ICAD in patients with BAO. There was no difference in 90-day outcomes between BAO patients with and without ICAD undergoing endovascular therapy.

Chronic basilar artery occlusion: a retrospective monocentric study.

Acute basilar artery occlusion is a life-threatening medical emergency with a highly elevated mortality rate when left untreated. Little is known about symptoms and clinical progression of chronic occlusions. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze the clinical presentation of patients with chronic basilar artery occlusion (CBAO). Monocentric retrospective analysis of adult patients with CBAO was treated between 2015 and 2023 in the Department of Neurology, Klinikum Kassel. Inclusion criteria were basilar artery occlusion without brainstem infarction as well as patients with a basilar artery occlusion in whom revascularization could not be achieved and a follow-up period of at least 3months. A total of 15 patients were found. In five patients basilar artery occlusion was diagnosed as an incidental finding, four patients had neurological symptoms but no proven brainstem infarction (3 × transient ischemic attack, 1 × isolated posterior artery infarct) and six patients presented with acute basilar artery occlusion and a follow-up > 3months. The most common site of occlusion was midbasilar (80%, n = 12), isolated (n = 7) or in combination with other locations (n = 5). In all cases collateralization could be demonstrated by the posterior communicatingarteries. The most common vascular risk factors (VRF) were hypertension (100%) and hypercholesterolemia (67%). Patients with CBAO may present with only mild symptoms or may even be asymptomatic. This condition may be survived for a long time. The high percentage of vascular risk factors and further cerebral vessel occlusions suggest arteriosclerosis as the major causing factor of CBAO.

IV Thrombolysis in Basilar Artery Occlusion: Outcomes and Comparison With Endovascular Thrombectomy.

Recanalization is considered a prerequisite for favorable outcome in basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) has been successfully used for eligible patients with BAO well beyond the 4.5-hour time window but has been largely underrepresented in the best medical management arms in recent randomized controlled trials of recanalization therapy in BAO. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients with BAO treated with IVT only and to compare IVT with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This observational single-center, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with BAO treated with IVT and/or EVT up to 48 hours of symptom onset during 1995-2022. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-3) at 3 months collected by a stroke physician by phone. In the first part, we described the outcomes and factors associated with functional outcome in the IVT-only cohort during 1995-2022. In the second part, we used doubly robust inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment models to compare functional outcome of patients treated with IVT vs EVT+/-IVT during 2010-2022. In the whole cohort of 376 patients with acute BAO treated with recanalization therapy, 245 (65.2%) received only IVT. In the IVT-only cohort, most patients had moderate-to-severe clinical presentation (median NIH Stroke Scale 18) but no extensive early ischemic changes in the posterior circulation on admission. Half of them had onset-to-treatment time over 6 hours. 46.5% of the IVT-treated patients achieved 3-month favorable functional outcome, whereas mortality was 35.9%. sICH occurred in 11.1%. In a multivariable analysis, younger age, milder symptom severity, and less baseline ischemic changes predicted favorable functional outcome. In the 2010-2022 cohort, when compared with patients treated with EVT+/-IVT (n = 121), the IVT-only cohort (n = 122) had higher odds for favorable functional outcome (IVT 58.2% vs EVT 43.0% (aOR 2.82 [95% CI 1.31-6.05]). IVT alone produced outcomes comparable with those in recent trials of endovascular BAO recanalization. Furthermore, in head-to-head comparison in our cohort, the IVT-only approach was more often associated with favorable outcome than EVT+/-IVT. Thus, it should not be overlooked as the first-line recanalization therapy in acute BAO, even in longer time windows. This study provides Class IV evidence that tPA is as effective as thrombectomy for basilar artery thrombosis.

Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The benefit and safety of intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains unclear. This article aims to investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis in acute BAO stroke patients. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant literature pertaining to patients with acute BAO who underwent endovascular thrombectomy alone or intravenous thrombolysis bridging with endovascular thrombectomy (bridging therapy), until January 10, 2024. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as a score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale at 90days. The safety outcome was mortality at 90days and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48h. Effect sizes were computed as risk ratio (RR) with random-effect models. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023462293). A total of 528 articles were obtained through the search and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. Finally, 2 RCTs and 10 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed that the endovascular thrombectomy alone group had a lower rate of functional independence compared to the bridging therapy group (29% vs 38%; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.88, p < 0.001), lower independent ambulation (39% vs 45%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.98, p = 0.01), and higher mortality (36% vs 28%, RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08-1.37, p = 0.001). However, no differences were detected in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between the two groups (6% vs 4%; RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.74-1.71, p = 0.58). Intravenous thrombolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy seemed to led to better functional independence, independent ambulation, and lower risk of mortality without increasing the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage compared to endovascular thrombectomy alone. However, given the non-randomized nature of this study, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Endovascular revascularization of vertebrobasilar tandem occlusions in comparison to isolated basilar artery occlusions: A multi-center experience.

Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a severe disease that is associated with an 85% mortality rate if untreated. Several studies have analyzed the use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the different scenarios of BAO. However, the results remain conflicting and the role of MT as standard of care for vertebrobasilar tandem occlusions (VBTO) has not been confirmed. Our goal was to assess technical feasibility, safety, and functional outcome of endovascular treatment of VBTO in comparison to isolated BAO (IBAO). We retrospectively reviewed all prospectively collected patients with acute BAO from six tertiary centers between September 2016 and November 2021. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups: VBTO and IBAO. Baseline data, procedural details, and outcomes were compared between groups. A total of 190 patients were included, 55 presenting with a VBTO and 135 with IBAO. Successful recanalization was equally common in both groups (89.1% and 86.0%). Rates of favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale: 0-2) were higher in patients with VBTO compared to IBAO (36.4% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.048) and mortality was lower (29.1% vs. 33.3%). However, these associations faded after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.35-2.05; aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.35-2.45). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ between the groups (VBTO: 7.3% vs. IBAO: 4.2%; p = 0.496). Endovascular treatment of VBTO is technically feasible and safe with similar rates of successful recanalization, favorable functional outcome, and mortality to those in patients with IBAO.

Influencing factors of futile recanalization after endovascular intervention in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion.

To explore the influence factors for futile recanalization following endovascular treatment (EVT) in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Clinical data of patients with acute BAO, who underwent endovascular treatment within 24 h of onset from January 2017 to November 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. The futile recanalization was defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grade ≥2b or 3 after successful reperfusion, but the modified Rankin Scale score >2 at 3 months after EVT. Binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of futile recanalization. A total of 471 patients with a median age of 68 (57, 74) years were included and 68.9% were males, among whom 298 (63.27%) experienced futile recanalization. Multivariate analysis revealed that concomitant atrial fibrillation (OR=0.456, 95%CI: 0.282-0.737, P<0.01), bridging thrombolysis (OR=0.640, 95%CI: 0.416-0.985, P<0.05), achieving mTICI grade 3 (OR=0.554, 95%CI: 0.334-0.918, P<0.05), arterial occlusive lesion (AOL) grade 3 (OR=0.521, 95%CI: 0.326-0.834, P<0.01), and early postoperative statin therapy (OR=0.509, 95%CI: 0.273-0.948, P<0.05) were protective factors for futile recanalization after EVT in acute BAO patients. High baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR=1.068, 95%CI: 1.049-1.087, P<0.01), coexisting hypertension (OR=1.571, 95%CI: 1.017-2.427, P<0.05), multiple retrieval attempts (OR=1.237, 95%CI: 1.029-1.488, P<0.05) and postoperative hemorrhagic transformation (OR=8.497, 95%CI: 2.879-25.076, P<0.01) were risk factors. For trial of ORG 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST) classification, cardiogenic embolism (OR=0.321, 95%CI: 0.193-0.534, P<0.01) and other types (OR=0.499, 95%CI: 0.260-0.961, P<0.05) were related to lower incidence of futile recanalization. The incidence of futile recanalization after EVT in patients with acute BAO is high. Bridging venous thrombolysis before operation and an early postoperative statin therapy may reduce the incidence of futile recanalization.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety Between Intravenous Thrombolysis, Direct Endovascular Therapy, and Bridging Therapy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion in Cerebral Infarction Patients

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), direct endovascular therapy (EVT), and bridging therapy (BT=IVT+EVT) for acute basilar artery occlusion cerebral infarction. MethodsOne hundred and fourteen patients with acute basilar artery occlusion cerebral infarctions admitted between January 2020 and August 2023 were selected. Differences in the reperfusion rate, prognosis, incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia, and mortality rate were compared among the three groups. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients who achieved successful reperfusion (86.8% vs. 84.2%) or complete reperfusion (72.1% vs. 68.4%) between the direct EVT and BT groups (both P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (3.7% vs. 10.3% vs. 10.5%, P=0.763). There were statistically significant differences in the rates of good prognosis (mRS score 0-2) (59.3% vs. 30.9% vs. 26.3%, P=0.021), stroke-related pneumonia (29.6% vs. 66.2% vs. 36.8%, P=0.002), and mortality (14.8% vs. 48.5% vs. 42.1%, P=0.010) among the three treatment groups. According to the binary logistic regression analysis, a good prognosis was independently associated with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <=10 (odds ratio [OR], 3.714; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.207-11.430; P =0.022) and the incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia (OR, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.484-0.845; P=0.002). ConclusionAlthough there were differences in prognosis, mortality, and incidence of complications among the three treatment groups, after adjusting for confounding factors, prognosis was independently correlated only with the baseline NIHSS score and stroke-associated pneumonia but not with treatment methods.

Trials of endovascular thrombectomy of basilar-artery occlusion compared to real-life data

BackgroundTwo recent clinical trials showed mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of basilar-artery occlusions (BAO) in stroke to be safe and effective: Endovascular Treatment for Acute BAO (ATTENTION) and BAO Chinese Endovascular (BAOCHE). The trials restricted patient inclusion on both age and pre-stroke mRS, and with both trials conducted in China, population differences may affect generalisability of the trial results. MethodsConsecutive patients with BAO undergoing MT were registered from 2017 to 2021 with retrospective data collection at a single centre with a predominantly Caucasian catchment population of 2.7 million. Age and pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were not absolute contraindications for MT. We present functional outcome as mRS at 90 days, patient characteristics and procedural safety compared to the trial intervention groups. ResultsOf the 108 included patients, 50 % achieved mRS 0–3 at 90 days and mortality was 32 %, which was no different from ATTENTION (46 %, p = 0.40, 37 %, p = 0.31, respectively) and BAOCHE (46 %, p = 0.50, 31 %, p = 0.93). Pre-stroke mRS 0 was seen in 62 %, 89 %, and 77 % of the study patients, ATTENTION, and BAOCHE, respectively. Proximal segment BAO was less common (22 % vs. 31 %, p = 0.04, and 65 %, p < 0.01) and intracranial stenting less frequently used (9 % vs. 40 % and 55 %, p < 0.01) in study patients compared to ATTENTION and BAOCHE, respectively. ConclusionOutcome of MT in BAO stroke in a clinical patient cohort was similar to recent trials, despite broader patient inclusion and differences in both occluded BAO segment and use of stenting. Our study suggest that MT is safe and effective in a Caucasian population.

Predictors of outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in acute basilar artery occlusions: Analysis of the PC-SEARCH thrombectomy registry.

Recent randomized controlled trials demonstrated superiority of mechanical thrombectomy compared to medical therapy in acute basilar artery occlusions, however, little data is available to guide clinicians in functional prognosis and risk stratification. Data from the retrospectively established PC-SEARCH Thrombectomy registry, which included patients with basilar artery occlusion from eight sites from January 2015 to December 2021, was interrogated. Outcomes were dichotomized into 90-day favorable (mRS ⩽ 3) and unfavorable (mRS > 3). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with respect to the outcome groups and were adjusted for potential confounding baseline characteristics. Four-hundred-forty-four patients were included in this analysis. Mean age was 66 [SD 15], with 56% male, and comprised of 76% Caucasian. Patients presented with an initial median NIHSS of 18 and 199 patients (44.8%) achieved favorable 90-day functional outcomes. Independent predictors of favorable outcomes included younger age, pc-ASPECTS > 8 (OR 2.30 p < 0.001), and TICI ⩾ 2b (OR 7.56 p < 0.001). Unfavorable outcomes were associated with increasing number of passes (OR 1.29 p = 0.004) and sICH (OR 4.19 p = 0.015). IA-tPA was an independent risk factor for sICH (OR 7.15 p = 0.002) without improving favorable functional outcomes. PC-ASPECTS > 8, successful recanalization (TICI ⩾ 2b), first-pass recanalization, and younger age are independent predictors of favorable 90-day functional outcome in thrombectomy treated patients with acute basilar artery occlusion. Conversely, sICH were independent predictors of unfavorable outcomes. IA-tPA and unsuccessful recanalization are independently associated with sICH.

Adjunct Intraarterial or Intravenous Tirofiban Versus No Tirofiban After Successful Recanalization of Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke: The BASILAR Registry.

Approximately half of patients who achieve successful reperfusion do not achieve functional independence. The present study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of intraarterial or intravenous tirofiban as adjunct therapy in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion who had achieved successful recanalization with endovascular treatment. In the national, prospective BASILAR (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study) registry, 458 patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into 3 groups based on tirofiban administration (no tirofiban, n=262; intravenous tirofiban, n=101; intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban, n=95). Their clinical outcomes were compared with 90-day modified Rankin Scale scores. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were obtained by logistic regression models and propensity score matching. Safety outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, and mortality. Among 458 included patients, 184 (40.2%) achieved a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3). There were no differences between the intravenous tirofiban group and the no tirofiban group in terms of safety and clinical outcomes (all P>0.05). Compared with the no tirofiban group, the intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban group had higher odds of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 3 (aOR, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.30-4.64], P=0.006) and lower 3-month mortality (aOR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.19-0.71], P=0.002) without an increase in any ICH (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.09-1.01], P=0.07) or symptomatic ICH (aOR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.03-0.90], P=0.05). Similar results of intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban on improving clinical outcomes were detected in novel cohorts constructed by propensity score matching. Intraarterial+intravenous rather than intravenous tirofiban improved clinical outcomes without increasing the frequency of symptomatic ICH among patients with basilar artery occlusion after successful endovascular treatment. Further studies are needed to delineate the roles of intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban in patients with basilar artery occlusion receiving endovascular treatment.

Efficacy of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion with Low PC-ASPECTS: A Nationwide Prospective Registry-Based Study.

We evaluated the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) on the functional outcome of patients with acute basilar artery occlusion and low posterior circulation acute stroke prognosis early computed tomography score (PC-ASPECTS). We identified patients with acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion and PC-ASPECTS of 6 or less, presenting within 24 h between August 2008 and April 2022. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 at 90 days. The secondary outcomes included an mRS score of 0-2, a favorable shift in the ordinal mRS scale, the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality at 90 days. We compared the outcome of patients treated with EVT and those without EVT, using the inverse probability of treatment weighting methods. Out of 566 patients, 55.5% received EVT. In the EVT group, 106 (33.8%) achieved favorable outcomes, compared to 56 patients (22.2%) in the conservative group. EVT significantly increased the likelihood of achieving a favorable outcome compared to conservative treatment (relative risk [RR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.74, p = 0.004). EVT was associated with a favorable shift in the mRS (RR 1.85, 95% CI, 1.49-2.29, p < 0.001) and reduced mortality without an increase in the risk of sICH. It did not have an impact on achieving an mRS score of 0-2. Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion and a PC-ASPECTS of 6 or less might benefit from EVT without an increasing sICH. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:788-799.

Abstract WMP90: Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment versus Best Medical Treatment for Acute Basilar-Artery Occlusion: Impacts of Etiology in the ATTENTION Randomized Trial

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment versus best medical treatment strategies in acute basilar artery occlusion with different stroke etiologies. Methods: The study was a post-hoc analysis of the Trial of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Basilar-artery Occlusion (ATTENTION), which was a multicenter, randomized trial at 36 centers in China from February 2021 to September 2022. Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion were classified into three groups according to stroke etiology: large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardioembolism (CE), and undetermined/other determined cause (UC/ODC). The primary outcome was favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-3) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Results: A total of 340 patients were included. Compared with best medical treatment, endovascular treatment was associated with higher rates of favorable outcome at 90 days in the LAA group (49.1% vs 23.8%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-6.71), CE group (52.2% vs 30.8%; aOR 3.68; 95%CI 1.04-12.97), and UC/ODC group (37.5% vs 17.4%; aOR 5.73, 95%CI 1.99-16.48). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving endovascular treatment with LAA, CE and UC/ODC was 8.3%, 2.2%, and 3.2%, respectively, and none of the best medical treatment patients. Endovascular treatment led to lower 90-day mortality than best medical treatment in LAA patients (33.3% vs 57.1%; aOR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19-0.91). Among patients receiving endovascular treatment, a better functional outcomes of CE etiology was found than the UC/ODC etiology (52.2% vs 37.5%; aOR 2.68; 95% CI 1.07-6.70); there was no differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality among the three etiology subtypes. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment was associated with better outcomes than the best medical treatment in acute basilar artery occlusion patients regardless of stroke etiologies, but the benefits-risk ratios were different among etiologies. The stroke etiology might be an important factor in predicting the prognosis of thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion.

Abstract WP183: Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

Background: Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease (ICAD) large vessel occlusion (LVO) is responsible for up to 30% of anterior circulation LVOs and is less amenable to mechanical thrombectomy. In this study we aim to determine the prevalence of ICAD acute basilar occlusion and the likelihood of favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0-3) compared to embolic basilar occlusion. Methods: This is an analysis of PC-SEARCH Thrombectomy Registry in which consecutive patients with acute basilar artery occlusions from 8 high-volume comprehensive stroke centers were included from January 2015 to December 2021. Patients were dichotomized into two cohorts: with or without underlying ICAD. Descriptive statistics for each group and multivariate logistic analysis was performed on the primary outcome. Results: Three-hundred-ninety-nine patients were included in this analysis. There were 143 (36%) and 256 (64%) patients with and without ICAD; respectively. Baseline demographics were equivalent between the two groups except for gender (male 67% vs 47%; p &lt; 0.001), history of stroke (24% vs 14%; p = 0.01), and atrial fibrillation (18% vs 30%; p = 0.01). Presenting NIHSS was similar between groups (15 vs 16; p = 0.85), however, pc-ASPECTS was higher in the ICAD group (9 vs 8; p = 0.02). At 90 days, patients with ICAD were less likely to achieve favorable functional outcomes (OR 0.33 95% CI 0.18 - 0.59; p &lt; 0.001) after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Additionally, ICAD patients were less likely to achieve TICI ≥2b (38% vs 49%; p &lt; 0.001). There were equivalent rates of symptomatic ICH between groups (OR 0.8 95% CI 0.29 - 2.22; p = 0.66). Conclusion: Acute basilar artery occlusions with underlying ICAD have higher likelihood of morbidity and mortality. Lower rates of successful recanalization in the ICAD cohort support this finding; however, rates of sICH were similar between the two cohorts.

Predictors of good outcomes and mortality after thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion within 12 hours of onset.

Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) who undergo combined standard medical treatment (SMT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) may still have unsatisfactory outcomes. This study was conducted to identify the factors that may impact their outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients with ABAO combined with SMT and EVT in the endovascular treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion (ATTENTION) trial. A good outcome is defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3, a poor outcome as mRS score of 4-6, and mortality as death at 90-day follow-up. The study analyzed various factors influencing the patients' good outcomes and mortality. The study included 221 patients (148 men and 73 women). Among these patients, 45.7% achieved an mRS score of 0-3, while the overall mortality rate was 37.1% (82/221). A good outcome was significantly associated with younger age (adjusted OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.99; P=0.019), a baseline posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS) of 8-10 (adjusted OR 2.34; 95% CI 1.07 to 5.12; P=0.034), and post-procedure pc-ASPECTS of 8-10 (adjusted OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.84; P=0.013). Additionally, time from puncture to reperfusion (adjusted OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.41; P=0.008) and intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR 3.59; 95% CI 1.09 to 11.8; P=0.035) were associated with 90-day mortality. Younger age, baseline pc-ASPECTS of 8-10, and higher post-procedure pc-ASPECTS could effectively predict good outcomes for patients with ABAO undergoing EVT. Additionally, a prolonged time from puncture to reperfusion and intracranial hemorrhage can independently predict mortality. NCT04751708.

Endovascular Therapy for Basilar Artery Occlusion in Sudden Onset to Maximal Deficit Ischemic Events.

The presence of sudden onset to maximal deficit (SOTMD) in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion often results in more severe outcomes. However, the effect of endovascular therapy on SOTMD and whether the outcome is affected by onset-to-puncture time remain unclear. This retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the prospective BASILAR (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study Registry). Consecutive patients with basilar artery occlusion receiving endovascular therapy were dichotomized into SOTMD and non-SOTMD cohorts. The primary outcomes included a favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-3), recanalization, and mortality at 90 days. The outcomes of patients with SOTMD were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. In the multivariate analysis, a favorable outcome was similar between the two cohorts (odds ratio [OR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.58-1.34]; P=0.5), although the mortality of patients with SOTMD was higher than that of patients with non-SOTMD (OR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.14-2.44]; P=0.008). The probability of mortality increased from 40.0% at 1 hour to 70.0% at 6 hours in the SOTMD cohort, and favorable outcomes of patients with non-SOTMD declined from 38.0% at 1 hour to 18.0% at 8 hours. No significant difference was observed in favorable outcomes between the SOTMD and non-SOTMD groups, although mortality was higher in the SOTMD cohort. The patients with SOTMD had a stronger time dependence for endovascular therapy in terms of mortality, while the time dependency regarding favorable outcome in the NSOTMD group was even higher. URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifier: ChiCTR1800014759.

The impact of stress hyperglycemia ratio on short-term and long-term outcomes for acute basilar artery occlusion underwent endovascular treatment

BackgroundStress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) reflects a true acute hyperglycemic state during acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO). We aimed to investigate the association between SHR and short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with ABAO receiving endovascular treatment (EVT).MethodsWe selected patients treated with EVT from the BASILAR study, a nationwide prospective registry. A total 250 patients with documented glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) values at admission were included. SHR was calculated as the ratio of glucose/HbA1C. All 250 patients completed 90 days of follow-up and 234 patients (93.6%) completed 1 year of follow-up. The primary outcome was the favorable outcome defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 3 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included mortality at 90 days and 1 year, and intracranial hemorrhage.ResultsAmong the 250 patients included, patients with higher tertiles of SHR were associated with decreased odds of a favorable functional outcome at 90 days (adjusted OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12–0.56; P = 0.001 and adjusted OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18–0.80; P = 0.01; respectively) and 1 year (adjusted OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.16–0.73; P = 0.006 and adjusted OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18–0.82; P = 0.01; respectively) after adjusting for confounding covariates. The mortality was comparable across tertiles of SHR groups at 90 days and 1 year.ConclusionsOur study showed that SHR was associated with a decreased probability of favorable functional outcome both at 90 days and 1 year after EVT in patients with ABAO. The relationship was more pronounced in non-diabetes patients.Trial registrationClinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800014759 (November 12, 2013).

The Role of Hyperdense Basilar Artery Sign in Predicting Outcome of Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion within Twelve Hours of Onset

The correlation between hyperdense basilar artery sign (HDBAS) and outcome after acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) is debated. Our objective was to determine the usefulness of HDBAS in predicting the outcomes of patients with ABAO after endovascular treatment (EVT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), and best medical treatment (BMT). The study's participants were selected from the ATTENTION trial. The study's primary outcome was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the secondary outcome was the recanalization rate, any intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. The study comprised 276 participants, with cohorts for EVT (N=188), IVT (N=82), and BMT (N=88). In EVT cohort, the HDBAS was not associated with 90-day mRS (adjusted OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.51-1.48; P=0.6029), the recanalization after 24 hours of onset (adjusted OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.30-3.61; P=0.9422), and 90-day mortality (adjusted OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41-1.46; P=0.4238). In IVT cohort, the HDBAS was not associated with 90-day mRS (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.31-1.56; P=0.3742), the recanalization after 24 hours of onset (adjusted OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 0.47-10.78; P=0.3132), and 90-day mortality (adjusted OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.26-1.57; P=0.3264). Similarly, in BMT cohort, the HDBAS was not associated with 90-day mRS (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.47-2.63; P=0.8152), the recanalization after 24 hours of onset (adjusted OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.40-4.02; P=0.6874), and 90-day mortality (adjusted OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.46-2.96; P=0.748). The HDBAS may not be a reliable predictor of outcomes for patients with ABAO, regardless of whether they received EVT, IVT, or BMT.

Effects of admission hyperglycemia and intravenous thrombolysis allocation in acute basilar artery occlusion after endovascular treatment: Analysis of the ATTENTION registry

This study was to investigate the admission hyperglycemia and modified effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on clinical outcomes in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) patients receiving endovascular treatment (EVT). We prospectively recruited acute BAO patients from 48 stroke centers across 22 Chinese provinces in the ATTENTION registry from 2017 to 2021. Hyperglycemia on admission was defined as glucose ≥7.8 ​mmol/L. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the correlation of hyperglycemia on admission with the primary outcome defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of <4 ​at 90 days, and the secondary outcomes defined as successful recanalization, mRS 0–1 and 0–2 ​at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality within 90 days. There were 1195 patients with acute BAO treated with EVT of whom 519 had hyperglycemia on admission. Hyperglycemia on admission was inversely associated with favorable neurological outcomes (mRS 0–3: adjusted odd ratio [aOR] 0.69, 95 ​% confidence intervals [CI] 0.54–0.89, P ​= ​0.004; mRS 0–1: aOR 0.67, 95 ​% CI 0.50–0.90, P ​= ​0.008; mRS 0–2: aOR 0.73, 95 ​% CI 0.56–0.95; P ​= ​0.02). Hyperglycemia on admission was not correlated to sICH nor successful recanalization. In the subgroup of BAO patients treated with direct EVT, those with hyperglycemia on admission had a higher mortality rate, and overall worse clinical outcomes at 90 days than patients without hyperglycemia. A significant interaction was observed between IVT and hyperglycemia on admission (Pinteraction ​= ​0.017). In patients with acute BAO treated with EVT, hyperglycemia on admission was associated with worse functional outcomes at 90 days but was not correlated with sICH nor successful recanalization. The effect of admission hyperglycemia appears to be modified by IVT allocation. Unique identifier: ChiCTR2000041117.