Diagnosis Of Acute Aortic Dissection Research Articles

DeBakey type 1 acute aortic dissection: Diagnostic and clinical challenges

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a clinical condition with an obscure prognosis, possibly fatal evolution and complicated diagnosis. Among the diseases that cause chest pain, the diagnosis of AAD is usually one of the least speculated, and the aid of imaging tests is often necessary to raise this hypothesis. The present case report aims to describe the clinical condition of admission and the therapeutic approach adopted in a patient who was admitted to the emergency department complaining of severe chest pain, radiating to the jaw. The initial suspicion was AMI, and catheterization was instituted, which did not show any coronary obstruction. Chest X-ray raised suspicion of AAD, which was confirmed with a CT angiography. Although she received an incorrect diagnosis at first, the patient was correctly submitted to the procedures and received appropriate treatment, having survived the acute condition of aortic dissection.

Preoperative management using Impella support for acute aortic dissection with left coronary malperfusion: a case report

BackgroundAcute aortic dissection (AAD) with impaired perfusion of the left coronary artery has a poor prognosis, even after urgent radical aortic surgery, due to extensive myocardial damage. Although Impella, a microaxial-flow catheter pump, is useful in managing acute myocardial infarction, it is generally contraindicated in patients with AAD because it is an intra-aortic device and the aortic structure is compromised in these cases. Here, we introduce a novel intervention that allowed a planned aortic repair after managing circulation using Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a case of AAD with left main trunk malperfusion.Case presentationA 40-year-old man presented with cardiogenic shock. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed to address left main trunk obstruction using an intra-aortic balloon pump; however, circulatory instability persisted. The patient was transferred to our hospital after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Impella CP™ was used to improve his circulatory status. However, a subsequent CT scan confirmed an AAD diagnosis. After 5 days of stable circulatory support, the patient underwent aortic root replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting.ConclusionsIn patients with AAD and coronary malperfusion, adjunctive circulatory management with Impella may be a valuable therapeutic option.

Comparison between transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection from an emergency perspective. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening medical condition with high early fatality. Therefore, a prompt and precise diagnosis, which can be achieved through invasive and non-invasive techniques is vital. Echocardiography, unlike MRI and CT, is accessible in emergency units and bedside-compatible. The recommended echocardiographic techniques for AAD are transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography (TTE and TOE). Therefore, our review compares their diagnostic roles in AAD. Studies relevant to our topic were attained through a database search and manual scrutiny of references lists of articles obtained from the electronic databases. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) has been used for quality assessment. All quantitative analyses were performed using either STATA 16 or Comprehensive Meta-Analyst software. The search strategy yielded 1,798 articles, of which only 11 were eligible for inclusion. Our subgroup analysis showed that conventional TTE had a sensitivity and specificity of 85.35% and 84.51% for the diagnosis of Stanford type A AAD and was 45.89% sensitive and 87.05% specific for the diagnosis of type B AAD. However, the subgroup analysis shows that contrast-enhancement of TTE results in a sensitivity and specificity of 93.30% and 97.60% for diagnosis of type A AAD, and 83.60% and 94.50% for diagnosis of type B AAD, respectively. On the other hand, conventional TOE was 93.64% sensitive and 95.50% specific for the diagnosis of type A AAD, 99.80% sensitive and 99.87% specific for the diagnosis of type B AAD. Moreover, our analyses show that TTE has pooled false negative and positive rates of 28.6% and 18.6%, while TOE has shown false negative and positive rates of 2.4% and 4.3%, respectively. TOE is the more favorable diagnostic tool for AAD diagnosis than TTE. However, it cannot be used as a stand-alone diagnostic tool since misdiagnosis cases are being reported. Contrast-enhanced TTE can also diagnose AAD since it provides similar results to conventional TOE.

Serum Sema7A is increased in patients with acute aortic dissection

ABSTRACT Background To observe the level of serum Sema7A in acute aortic dissection (AAD) and its diagnostic value for AAD. Research design and methods Patients with sudden chest pain including AAD, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were enrolled. Patients without chest pain or cardiovascular diseases were included as the controls. Serum Sema7A and plasma D-dimer were detected and compared in each group. Results 85 AAD patients, 55 AMI patients, 15 PE patients, and 30 controls were enrolled. The concentration of Serum Sema7A in the AAD group was significantly higher than that in the control, AMI and PE group. Serum Sema7A was positively correlated with D-dimer. In AAD patients who underwent invasive intervention therapy, serum Sema7A levels were significantly decreased after the intervention. Serum Sema7A was an independent risk factor for the presence of AAD. The areas under the ROC curve of Sema7A and D-dimer for differential diagnosis of AAD from other chest pain disorders were 0.842 (0.776, 0.909) and 0.788 (0.714, 0.862), respectively. Conclusions Sema7A is highly expressed in patients with AAD. Sema7A might be a valuable biomarker for the early diagnosis of AAD and has the potential to differentiate AAD from AMI and PE.

Metabolomic characterization benefits the identification of acute lung injury in patients with type A acute aortic dissection.

Introduction: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) often leads to the development of acute lung injury (ALI). However, the early detection and diagnosis of AAD in patients with ALI pose significant challenges. The objective of this study is to investigate distinct metabolic alterations in the plasma samples of AAD patients with ALI, AAD patients without ALI, and healthy individuals. Method: Between September 2019 and September 2022, we retrospectively collected data from 228 AAD patients who were diagnosed with ALI through post-surgery chest X-ray and PaO2/FiO2 assessments. Univariate analysis was employed to identify pre-surgery risk factors for ALI. Additionally, we conducted high-throughput target metabolic analysis on 90 plasma samples, comprising 30 samples from AAD patients with ALI, 30 from patients with AAD only, and 30 from healthy controls. After LC-MS spectral processing and metabolite quantification, the recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV) analysis based on the random forest was used to select the optimal metabolites as a diagnostic panel for the detection of AAD patients with ALI. The support vector machines (SVM) machine learning model was further applied to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the established biomarker panel. Results: In the univariate analysis, preoperative β-HB and TNF-α exhibited a significant association with lung injury (OR = 0.906, 95% CI 0.852-0.965, p = 0.002; OR = 1.007, 95% CI 1.003-1.011, p < 0.0001). The multiple-reaction monitoring analysis of 417 common metabolites identified significant changes in 145 metabolites (fold change >1.2 or <0.833, p < 0.05) across the three groups. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed notable differences between AAD patients and healthy controls. When compared with the non-ALI group, AAD patients with ALI displayed remarkable upregulation in 19 metabolites and downregulation in 4 metabolites. Particularly, combining citric acid and glucuronic acid as a biomarker panel improved the classification performance for distinguishing between the ALI and non-ALI groups. Discussion: Differentially expressed metabolites in the ALI group were primarily involved in amino acids biosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism (TCA cycle), arginine and proline metabolism, and glucagon signaling pathway. These findings demonstrate a great potential of the targeted metabolomic approach for screening, routine surveillance, and diagnosis of pulmonary injury in patients with AAD.

Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Aortic Dissection: A Nationwide Registry Study

BackgroundWe aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes in a nationwide population of patients with acute type A and type B aortic dissection. MethodsAll patients in Denmark with a first-time diagnosis of acute aortic dissection between 2006 and 2015 were identified by national registries. The main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and long-term survival in hospital survivors. ResultsThe study population comprised 1157 (68%) patients with type A aortic dissection and 556 (32%) patients with type B aortic dissection, median age of 66 (57-74) years and 70 (61-79) years, respectively. Men accounted for 64%. Median follow-up was 8.9 (6.8-11.5) years. Of patients with type A aortic dissection, 74% were managed surgically, whereas 22% of the patients with type B aortic dissection were managed with surgery or endovascular technique. In-hospital mortality was 27% for type A aortic dissection overall (surgery, 18%; no surgery, 52%) and 16% for type B aortic dissection (surgery or endovascular treatment, 13%; conservative treatment, 17%; P < .001, type A vs type B). Of patients discharged alive, survival was persistently better for type A aortic dissection than for type B aortic dissection (P < .001). Unadjusted 1- and 3-year survival of patients with type A aortic dissection discharged alive was 96% and 91%, respectively, for surgically managed and 88% and 78% without surgery. For type B aortic dissection, the numbers were 89% and 83% for endovascular/surgically managed and 89% and 77% for conservatively managed. ConclusionsWe found higher in-hospital mortality for type A and type B aortic dissection than is reported from referral center registries. Type A aortic dissection had the highest mortality rate during the acute phase, whereas for patients who were discharged alive, the mortality rate was higher for patients with type B aortic dissection.

Twenty-five years of observations from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) and its impact on the cardiovascular scientific community

ObjectiveThe International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) celebrated its 25th anniversary in January 2021. This study evaluated IRAD's role in promoting the understanding and management of acute aortic dissection (AD) over these years. MethodsIRAD studies were identified, analyzed, and ranked according to their citations per year (c/y) to determine the most-cited IRAD studies and topics. A systematic search of the literature identified cardiovascular guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute AD. Consequently, IRAD's presence and impact were quantified using these documents. ResultsNinety-seven IRAD studies were identified, of which 82 obtained more than 10 cumulative citations. The median c/y index was 7.33 (25th-75th percentile, 4.01-16.65). Forty-two studies had a greater than median c/y index and were considered most impactful. Of these studies, most investigated both type A and type B AD (n = 17, 40.5%) and short-term outcomes (n = 26, 61.9%). Nineteen guideline documents were identified from 26 cardiovascular societies located in Northern America, Europe, and Japan. Sixty-nine IRAD studies were cited by these guidelines, including 38 of the 42 most-impactful IRAD studies. Among them, partial thrombosis of the false lumen as a predictor of postdischarge mortality and aortic diameters as a predictor of type A occurrence were determined as most-impactful specific IRAD topics by their c/y index. ConclusionsIRAD has had and continues to have an important role in providing observations, credible knowledge, and research questions to improve the outcomes of patients with acute AD.

Investigation of effective invasive blood pressure control methods to prevent acute exacerbation of acute aortic dissection.

Acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and increased risk of complications. Acute exacerbations have a relatively high frequency; however, the contributing factors are unclear. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate control are important factors, but the ideal BP control strategy to prevent acute exacerbations under invasive arterial pressure monitoring remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between invasive arterial BP and the effects of acute exacerbation of aortic dissection. This single-centre, retrospective, case-control study included 104 patients with a partial diagnosis of acute aortic dissection (Stanford type A or B) who were treated conservatively between September 2013 and September 2022. The patients were divided into exacerbation (acute exacerbation; n = 26) and stable (no acute deterioration) groups. The SBP trend (122.5 ± 13.1 vs. 116.6 ± 10.6 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.024) and mean BP trend (77.8 ± 5.8 vs. 74.4 ± 7.5 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.038) significantly differed between the two groups. The time to target BP was significantly longer in the exacerbation group ( P = 0.036). The exacerbation group did not achieve a mean SBP < 120 mmHg. Moreover, the importance of early BP reduction was demonstrated in the present study.

A case of acute aortic dissection in emergency department: lessons learned

Background: Early diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection (AAD) can be a challenge for emergency physicians given its unspecific and variable presentation. For this reason, it is frequently referred to as \&amp;quot;the great imitator,\&amp;quot; as it can mimic so many other conditions, including acute coronary syndrome and stroke. Case Presentation: We report a middle-aged male who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with complaints of dizziness. His vitals showed differences in blood pressure (BP) between both arms and an absent pulse in the right arm. a computerized tomographic (CT) angiography of the aorta, which showed a Stanford type A aortic dissection. The patient was in stable condition until he was transferred to another health care facility for further care and intervention. AAD is a challenging diagnosis to make in the ED and has a high mortality rate, especially if there is a delay in diagnosis and definitive management. Conclusion: So far, there are no blood tests available that accurately rule in or rule out AAD. While bedside transthoracic echocardiography can be used as an adjunct test in unstable patients, computerized tomographic (CT) angiography remains a pragmatic reference standard for the diagnosis of AAD.

Abstract 11743: Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease / End Stage Renal Disease on Aortic Dissection: Results From the Nationwide Readmission Database

Introduction: Prior literature has shown that in-hospital and postoperative renal failure are independent mortality predictors in acute aortic dissection (AAD). However, there is limited data on chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as pre-existing outcome predictors with AAD Methods: The Nationwide Readmission Database was analyzed from 2016 to 2019 for adult patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of AAD. Patients were assessed for CKD and ESRD. Outcomes were measured for the effect of renal dysfunction on 30-day readmission, inpatient mortality, and length of stay (LOS). Results: Aortic dissection occurred in 45,481 patients over the study period, of which 4727 were readmitted. The mean age was 64 years, and logistical regression analysis revealed that patients with ESRD admitted with AAD were 58% more likely to be readmitted (95% CI [1.29 - 1.93], p&lt;0.001) within 30 days than those without (Figure 1). Notably, ESRD patients had a 30% reduction (95% CI 0.57 - 0.86) in in-patient mortality (Figure 2). Mean LOS was also higher for ESRD patients (6.7 days, 95% CI 5.09 - 8.38) while lower for CKD stage 3-5 (-1.06 days, 95% CI -1.62 --0.50) compared with those without renal disease. Discussion: We observed that patients with ESRD and AAD have higher readmission rates and LOS. However, decreased mortality rates compared with patients with CKD stages 3-5 were observed that could be attributed to increased exposure to healthcare interventions secondary to frequent hemodialysis follow-ups, compared with CKD stages 3-5. Early stages of CKD were excluded, given the possibility of a lack of coding in electronic medical records.

Potential metabolomic biomarkers for the identification and diagnosis of type A acute aortic dissection in patients with hypertension

Most patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) have a history of hypertension. Diagnosis of AAD in patients with hypertension at an early stage is complicated and challenging. This study aimed to explore the distinctive metabolic changes in plasma samples of AAD patients with hypertension and patients with hypertension only and provide early identification and diagnosis of AAD in patients with hypertension. We collected blood samples from 20 patients with type A AAD and hypertension admitted to the emergency department and physically examined other 20 patients with hypertension as controls. The plasma metabolomic profiles of these patients were determined using untargeted metabolomics with ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. A total of 38 metabolites that differed between the AAD and hypertension groups were screened. In the positive ion mode, 12 metabolites were different between the two groups, and in the negative ion mode, 26 metabolites were different. Among the 26 different metabolites detected by the negative ion mode, 21 were significantly upregulated and five were downregulated in patients with AAD compared to patients with hypertension. Moreover, five metabolites were upregulated and seven were significantly downregulated in patients with AAD compared to those with hypertension, as detected by the positive ion mode. The metabolites differentially expressed in AAD were mainly involved in lipid metabolism (fatty acid biosynthesis, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, and linoleic acid metabolism), carbohydrate metabolism (galactose, fructose, and mannose metabolisms), and membrane transport (ATP-binding cassette transporters). Interestingly, plasma hydrocortisone and dimethylglycine concentrations were significantly increased in patients with type A AAD, with the highest area under the curve value (AUC = 0.9325 or 0.9200, respectively) tested by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. This study provides possible metabolic markers for the early clinical diagnosis of AAD in patients with hypertension.

Report of Aortic Dissection without Risk Factor And Typical Symptoms in a 25-Year Old Man

Background: Acute aortic dissection is a rare but serious and life-threatening disease. The main symptom is chest pain, but in some patients, atypical symptoms are also observed. Case presentation: In this report, we reported a patient diagnosed with aortic dissection with atypical symptoms. The patient has been referred with nausea and vomiting. After a thorough examination, the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection was established. Conclusion: Aortic dissection may have no typical symptoms and deep examination in all suspected patients, is necessary.

Changes of Serum D-Dimer, NT-proBNP, and Troponin I Levels in Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection and the Clinical Significance.

Objective To investigate the changes in blood D-dimer (D-D), high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI), and N-terminal B-type brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) and its clinical significance. Methods Forty patients with AAD diagnosed in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected as the observation group, and 40 patients with chest pain and non-AAD treated in our hospital during the same period were included in the control group. The patients were subdivided into a death group and a survival group as per the prognosis. The clinical symptoms and signs of the two groups of patients upon admission were observed, and the levels of D-D, hs-cTnI, and NT-proBNP were determined. The differences in clinical data, plasma D-D, hs-cTnI, and NT-proBNP levels between the two groups of patients were analyzed. Results The clinical data and physical signs were homogeneous between the two groups (P > 0.05), while a significant elevation in the level of hs-cTnI in the control group was observed 24 h after admission (P < 0.05). The observation group showed significantly higher levels of D-D, NT-proBNP, and hs-cTnI than the control group (P < 0.05). The prevalence and surgical cure rate of Stanford A in the survival group were significantly lower in contrast with the death group, with an obvious higher intervention cure rate in the survival group. Higher D-dimer and NT-proBNP levels were identified at 24 h after admission versus upon admission, and the death group had a greater increase of D-dimer and NT-proBNP levels. Conclusion Clinical symptoms and signs are insufficient to constitute a diagnosis of AAD, whereas the elevated expression levels of D-D, hs-cTnI, and NT-proBNP demonstrated great potential for the diagnosis and prognosis of AAD.

Usefulness of Computed Tomography Parameters in Predicting the Clinical Outcomes of Acute Aortic Dissection

Acute aortic dissection is a potentially life-threatening condition among patients presenting with chest pain to emergency department. Without a prompt diagnosis and treatment, it carries high mortality and morbidity. Computed tomography (CT) of thorax and abdomen is one of the commonly used non-invasive investigation modalities for diagnosis of acute aortic dissection. Apart from making a diagnosis, there are a number of parameters in the CT images that may be helpful in providing prognostic information. In this study, prognostic values of these parameters in predicting both short term and intermediate term clinical outcomes of acute aortic dissection will be evaluated. Methods and Results

D-dimer: old dogmas, new (COVID-19) tricks.

D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product encompassing multiple cross-linked D domains and/or E domains present in the original fibrinogen molecule, whose generation is only theoretically possible when hemostasis and fibrinolysis pathways are concomitantly activated. D-dimer measurement has now become a pillar in the diagnosis/exclusion and prognostication of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), when incorporated into validated clinical algorithms and especially using age-adjusted diagnostic thresholds. Although emerging evidence is also supporting its use for predicting the duration of anticoagulant therapy in certain categories of patients, the spectrum of clinical applications is constantly expanding beyond traditional thrombotic pathologies to the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection, acute intestinal ischemia and cerebral venous thrombosis among others, embracing also clinical management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recent findings attest that D-dimer elevations are commonplace in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) infection (especially in those with thrombosis), its value predicts the clinical severity (up to death) of COVID-19 and remains more frequently increased in COVID-19 patients with post-discharge clinical sequelae. Further, D-dimer-based anticoagulant escalation may be associated with a lower risk of death in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and, finally, D-dimer elevation post-COVID-19 vaccination mirrors an increased risk of developing vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT).

A Retrospective Analysis of Serum D-Dimer Levels for the Exclusion of Acute Aortic Dissection.

PurposeAcute aortic dissection (AAD) is a highly fatal disorder if not promptly diagnosed. Some international studies have suggested that serum d-dimer levels may be used to exclude AAD, but data are limited. We sought to confirm that d-dimer levels are elevated in American patients with AAD. Additionally, we sought to estimate the test characteristics of the d-dimer for AAD.Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of patients in the Hospital Corporation of America database who arrived at the hospital between 2015 and 2019. We queried the database to find patients who had a diagnosis of AAD or (nonspecific) chest pain, and who also had a d-dimer performed within 24 hours of arrival at the hospital. The median d-dimer was compared in those diagnosed with AAD versus chest pain. We estimated the test characteristics of d-dimer for AAD at the standard cutoff value of 500 ng/mL.ResultsIn total, 48,902 patients met the criteria for analysis, including 572 with AAD and 48,330 with chest pain. The median d-dimers were 2455 ng/mL and 385 ng/mL for the AAD and chest pain groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Using a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, the sensitivity of the d-dimer was 91.1% and the specificity was 71.4%.ConclusionSerum d-dimer values are higher in patients with AAD than in those with nonspecific chest pain. At the standard cutoff of 500 ng/mL, the serum d-dimer has a high sensitivity for AAD, but not high enough that d-dimer levels alone can be used in isolation to exclude AAD.

Diagnostic Value of Aortic Dissection Risk Score, Coagulation Function, and Laboratory Indexes in Acute Aortic Dissection.

Objective This study was aimed at studying the diagnostic value of aortic dissection (AD) risk score, coagulation function, and laboratory indicators in acute aortic dissection (AAD). Methods In this retrospective study, 57 patients with AAD and 57 with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). During the same period, 50 healthy subjects were selected as the control group admitted to our institution which were assessed for eligibility and recruited. They were assigned to an AD group (AAD patients) and an ACS group (ACS patients). The AD risk scores, coagulation function indexes, and laboratory indexes of the two groups were compared. With digital subtraction angiography- (DSA-) based diagnosis result as the gold standard, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of various indexes for AD, and the sensitivity, specificity, and optimal diagnostic value (Youden index) of the diagnostic indexes were calculated. Additionally, the overall blood clot formation strength (MA), clotting factor function (R), platelet function (MAp), and functional fibrinogen (MAf) levels were evaluated. Results AAD risk, AD screening, early diagnosis of AAD, fibrinogen degradation products (FDP), fibrinogen (Fib), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), tenascin C (TN-C), D-dimer (D-D), and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP) in the three groups were statistically different (P < 0.05). Further pairwise comparisons showed that the AD patients got higher scores of AAD risk, AD screening, and early diagnosis of AAD versus ACS patients (P < 0.05). AD was associated with lower levels of fibrinogen degradation products (FDP) and fibrinogen (Fib), shorter prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) versus ACS (P < 0.05). AD also resulted in higher levels of tenascin C (TN-C), D-dimer (D-D), and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide precursor (NT-proBNP) versus ACS (P < 0.05). The three risk scores, various laboratory indicators, and various coagulation function indicators were of high diagnostic values for the diagnosis of AAD (AUC > 0.9, P < 0.05). The sensitivity of the AD screening scale and TN-C expression level to the diagnosis of AAD was up to 100%, and the specificity of TN-C expression level was up to 98.25%. The influencing factors of AAD included Fib, FDP, PT, APTT, D-D, TN-C, and NT-proBNP. MA, MAf, and MAp displayed the same trend and reached the lowest point at T2. R was the opposite and reached the highest point at T2. At T4, a higher Map and a lower MAf were found than before surgery, and R and MA returned to preoperative levels. The positive detection rate of ACS by CT scan was positively correlated with the degree of stenosis (r = 0.814, P < 0.05). Conclusion AD screening scale, TN-C, and FDP are of the highest diagnostic value in the risk score of AD, laboratory indicators, and coagulation function. It has implications for the diagnosis of ADD.

Cardiac Findings at Necropsy in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Described herein are necropsy findings in 97 patients aged 22 to 82 years (mean 55), 37 women, 60 men, studied at necropsy with acute aortic dissection (AD) with the intimal-medial tear in the ascending aorta. The cases were studied from 1966 to 1989, a period when echocardiography and computed tomography were relatively infrequently available for diagnosis of AD. Arteriography was the method for diagnosis in most cases. Of the 97 cases, 30(31%) had operative intervention and 67 did not. Most appeared to have had systemic hypertension before the acute AD; only 4 had previous heart failure; only 8 had considerable atherosclerotic coronary disease; only 4 had a left ventricular (LV) scar and in each it was small; most (96%) had a normal-sized LV cavity (suggesting normal cardiac indices in them), and the other 4 had only a mildly dilated cavity; the heart weight in all 97 patients was increased; the quantity of subepicardial adipose tissue was increased in most patients, and the frequency of a congenitally malformed aortic valve was much higher than in the general population (6% - vs- 1%), but still uncommon. Thus, in > 90% of patients with acute Type A AD, coronary atherosclerosis was insignificant, myocardial fibrosis is absent, and the aortic valve has 3 cusps without stenosis.

De Winter electrocardiogram pattern due to type A aortic dissection: a case report

BackgroundDe Winter electrocardiograph (ECG) pattern is an atypical presentation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) due to severe stenosis of the left anterior descending (LAD). Complications of acute aortic dissection (AD) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with de Winter sign are relatively rare and physicians may easily miss the diagnosis of AD. We report a case of patient with acute chest pain and de Winter ECG pattern due to AD involving the left main coronary artery (LM), LAD and left circumflex artery (LCX).Case presentationA 57-year-old male patient was initially diagnosed with AMI and then the diagnosis of acute AD was supported by transthoracic echocardiograph (TTE). After two stents were implanted respectively into the proximal LM-LAD and LM-LCX, he recovered from cardiogenic shock. Two months later, the patient underwent the surgery of ascending aorta replacement. After the surgery, there was no obvious chest discomfort during follow-up.ConclusionsWhen an ECG shows a “de Winter pattern”, we should also consider the possibility of AD which result in LAD occlusion. TTE is a useful tool in screening for AD. Further research is needed to prove that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be a useful treatment strategy in the case of AD leading to severe LAD occlusion and unstable hemodynamics when there’s no condition to perform aortic replacement surgery immediately.

Left Flank Pain: is it Renal Colic Or Contralateral Pathology…?

Background Acute aortic dissection is an uncommon but life-threatening emergency, which is often missed in up to 38% of patients on initial evaluation, and in up to 28% of patients, the diagnosis is made at autopsy. Painless aortic dissection has been reported, but is relatively uncommon. The mortality rates are estimated at 50% by 48 hours and increase by 1% per hour if undiagnosed. Case presentation We report a case of atypical aortic dissection who presented to ER with subtle unspecific contralateral renal colicky like pain as a primary symptom, which had made the prompt diagnosis very challenging and difficult. Patient had no history of any chronic disease. Vital signs and abdominal examination were normal. Provisional diagnosis of renal colic was made, analgesic was given to control the pain. Laboratory result showed (4+) RBCS in point of care strip testing otherwise were unremarkable, and CT KUB was requested. Provisional CT-KUB reported by radiologist as unremarkable for any genitourinary pathology. On careful review of the above plain CT by emergency physician, there was ecstatic flap like calcification of thoraco-abdominal aorta. Urgent CT with contrast was requested which confirmed Stanford B aortic dissection. Conclusion Proper diagnosis of acute aortic dissection can be difficult when patients present atypically, especially with subtle unspecific symptoms. Aortic dissection is to be considered, even without the presence of characteristic pain in elderly specifically and high-risk patients. A heightened level of attention with low threshold of requesting proper imaging elderly or those with high-risk patient with back or flank pain, are needed for better diagnosis and exclude other catastrophic causes like aortic dissection. Also emphasizing on emergency physicians review of the images in emergency department and integration of radiology training in emergency medicine program, which helps in prompt diagnosis.