Acute Administration Of Buspirone Research Articles

Buspirone Counteracts MK-801-Induced Schizophrenia-Like Phenotypes through Dopamine D3 Receptor Blockade.

Background: Several efforts have been made to develop effective antipsychotic drugs. Currently, available antipsychotics are effective on positive symptoms, less on negative symptoms, but not on cognitive impairment, a clinically relevant dimension of schizophrenia. Drug repurposing offers great advantages over the long-lasting, risky and expensive, de novo drug discovery strategy. To our knowledge, the possible antipsychotic properties of buspirone, an azapirone anxiolytic drug marketed in 1986 as serotonin 5-HT1A receptor (5-HT1AR) partial agonist, have not been extensively investigated despite its intriguing pharmacodynamic profile, which includes dopamine D3 (D3R) and D4 receptor (D4R) antagonist activity. Multiple lines of evidence point to D3R as a valid therapeutic target for the treatment of several neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that buspirone, behaving as dopamine D3R antagonist, may have antipsychotic-like activity.Materials and Methods: Effects of acute administration of buspirone was assessed on a wide-range of schizophrenia-relevant abnormalities induced by a single administration of the non-competitive NMDAR antagonist MK-801, in both wild-type mice (WT) and D3R-null mutant mice (D3R-/-).Results: Buspirone (3 mg⋅kg-1, i.p.) was devoid of cataleptogenic activity in itself, but resulted effective in counteracting disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI), hyperlocomotion and deficit of temporal order recognition memory (TOR) induced by MK-801 (0.1 mg⋅kg-1, i.p.) in WT mice. Conversely, in D3R-/- mice, buspirone was ineffective in preventing MK-801-induced TOR deficit and it was only partially effective in blocking MK-801-stimulated hyperlocomotion.Conclusion: Taken together, these results indicate, for the first time, that buspirone, might be a potential therapeutic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia. In particular, buspirone, through its D3R antagonist activity, may be a useful tool for improving the treatment of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia that still represents an unmet need of this disease.

Acute buspirone dosing enhances abuse-related subjective effects of oral methamphetamine

There is not an approved pharmacotherapy for treating methamphetamine use disorder. This study sought to determine the effects of acute buspirone treatment on the subjective and cardiovascular effects of oral methamphetamine in order to provide an initial assessment of the utility, safety, and tolerability of buspirone for managing methamphetamine use disorder. We predicted that acute buspirone administration would reduce the subjective effects of methamphetamine. We also predicted that the combination of buspirone and methamphetamine would be safe and well tolerated. Ten subjects completed the protocol, which tested three methamphetamine doses (0, 15, and 30mg) in combination with two buspirone doses (0 and 30mg) across 6 experimental sessions. Subjective effects and physiological measures were collected at regular intervals prior to and after dose administration. Methamphetamine produced prototypical subjective and cardiovascular effects. Acute buspirone administration increased some of the abuse-related subjective effects of methamphetamine and also attenuated some cardiovascular effects. The combination of oral methamphetamine and buspirone was safe and well tolerated. Acute buspirone administration may increase the abuse liability of oral methamphetamine. Chronic buspirone dosing studies remain to be conducted, but given preclinical findings and the outcomes of this work, the utility of buspirone for treating methamphetamine use disorder appears limited.

The immediate and the delayed effects of buspirone on zebrafish (Danio rerio) in an open field test: A 3-D approach

Behavioral changes in zebrafish induced by acute administration of buspirone have been interpreted to be the result of reduced anxiety. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether the effects of short-term and mid-term habituation to an open field corroborated the anxiolytic hypothesis. We exposed single zebrafish for 60min to 5mgL buspirone and tested them twice, immediately after exposure and again 3.5h later. Each session lasted 20min. Distance from bottom of tank, velocity, duration freezing, distance from center and horizontal distribution, and preferred spatial location were analyzed with a 3-D tracking system. In the early session (starting at 10:30), 20min habituation of control zebrafish only marginally increased distance from bottom, which was still 90% higher in zebrafish treated with buspirone. When extending the habituation to 3.5h, the picture became more complex. Distance from bottom did not further increase in control zebrafish. More importantly, some signs of increased anxiety were present in the buspirone group, such as increased freezing, reduced velocity, and increased bottom-dwelling. However, analyzing data of individual fish excluded rebound anxiety as unlikely. The delayed effects might be drug side effects, such as motor impairment and/or dizziness. The immediate and the delayed effects of buspirone have the appearance to be unrelated.

Acute buspirone abolishes the expression of behavioral dopaminergic supersensitivity in mice.

Previous studies have shown that rats withdrawn from long-term treatment with dopamine receptor blockers exhibit dopaminergic supersensitivity, which can be behaviorally evaluated by enhanced general activity observed in an open-field. Recently, it has been reported that co-treatment with the non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic buspirone attenuates the development of haloperidol-induced dopaminergic supersensitivity measured by open-field behavior of rats. The aims of the present study were: 1) to determine, as previously reported for rats, if mice withdrawn from long-term neuroleptic treatment would also develop dopaminergic supersensitivity using open-field behavior as an experimental paradigm, and 2) to examine if acute buspirone administration would attenuate the expression of this behavioral dopaminergic supersensitivity. Withdrawal from long-term haloperidol treatment (2.5 mg/kg, once daily, for 20 days) induced a significant (30%) increase in ambulation frequency (i.e., number of squares crossed in 5-min observation sessions) but did not modify rearing frequency or immobility duration in 3-month-old EPM-M1 male mice observed in the open-field apparatus. Acute intraperitoneal injection of buspirone (3.0 and 10 but not 1.0 mg/kg, 12-13 animals per group) 30 min before open-field exposure abolished the increase in locomotion frequency induced by haloperidol withdrawal. These data suggest that the open-field behavior of mice can be used to detect dopaminergic supersensitivity, whose expression is abolished by acute buspirone administration.

O-17-5 - Sleep and waking in 5,7-DHT-lesioned or (-)-pindolol-pretreated rats after administration of buspirone, ipsapirone, or gepirone

The effects of partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists buspirone (0.010–4.0 mg/kg), ipsapirone (0.010–6.0 mg/kg), and gepirone (0.025–4.0 mg/kg) on sleep and waking were studied in vehicle-treated and 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT)-injected rats. 5,7-DHT-treated animals showed a marked and significant serotonin and 5-HIAA depletion in the raphe regions of the pons and upper brain stem, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. Subcutaneous administration of the partial agonists to both the vehicle-infused and the 5,7-DHT-treated animals significantly increased waking (W) and reduced light sleep (LS), slow-wave sleep (SWS), and REM sleep (REMS). Pretreatment with (−)-pindolol (2.0 mg/kg) reversed the effects of buspirone and gepirone on W and non-REM sleep (LS + SWS) whereas REMS remained suppressed. (−)-Pindolol failed to reverse the effects of ipsapirone on sleep and W. The present results tend to indicate that increased W after acute administration of buspirone, ipsapirone, or gepirone depends upon the activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. The well-known anxiolytic action observed after chronic administration of the azapirones seems to be related to mechanisms other that these involved in their stimulant effect.

Acute administration of buspirone increases the escape of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis hormones from suppression by dexamethasone in depression

Recently, our laboratory found a significant enhancing effect of L-5-hydroxy-tryptophan (L-5-HTP) on post-dexamethasone (DST) plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels in major-but not in minor-depression. To further elucidate the effects of central serotonin (5-HT) activity on the negative feedback of glucocorticoids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis function in depression, this study investigates the effects of buspirone, a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, on post-DST ACTH and cortisol levels in 75 depressed subjects. Plasma post-DST ACTH and cortisol concentrations were significantly increased by the acute administration of buspirone (30 mg PO) compared to placebo. There were no differences in buspirone-induced post-DST ACTH or cortisol responses between minor and major depression. There were significant correlations between post-DST ACTH and cortisol, and between post-DST-buspirone ACTH and cortisol. The buspirone-induced post-DST cortisol responses were significantly higher in depressed women than men. It is concluded that buspirone may augment ACTH and, consequently, cortisol escape from suppression by dexamethasone in major as well as in minor depression.

Sleep and waking in 5,7-DHT-lesioned or (−)-pindolol-pretreated rats after administration of buspirone, ipsapirone, or gepirone

The effects of partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists buspirone (0.010–4.0 mg/kg), ipsapirone (0.010–6.0 mg/kg), and gepirone (0.025–4.0 mg/kg) on sleep and waking were studied in vehicle-treated and 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT)-injected rats. 5,7-DHT-treated animals showed a marked and significant serotonin and 5-HIAA depletion in the raphe regions of the pons and upper brain stem, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and striatum. Subcutaneous administration of the partial agonists to both the vehicle-infused and the 5,7-DHT-treated animals significantly increased waking (W) and reduced light sleep (LS), slow-wave sleep (SWS), and REM sleep (REMS). Pretreatment with (−)-pindolol (2.0 mg/kg) reversed the effects of buspirone and gepirone on W and non-REM sleep (LS + SWS) whereas REMS remained suppressed. (−)-Pindolol failed to reverse the effects of ipsapirone on sleep and W. The present results tend to indicate that increased W after acute administration of buspirone, ipsapirone, or gepirone depends upon the activation of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. The well-known anxiolytic action observed after chronic administration of the azapirones seems to be related to mechanisms other that these involved in their stimulant effect.

Differential effect of buspirone and diazepam on negative contrast in one-way avoidance learning

The main aim of the present work was to investigate the effect of buspirone, a 5-HT 1A receptor agonist, on successive negative contrast in one-way avoidance learning. Successive negative contrast was induced by shifting rats from a large reward (30 s spent in the safe compartment) to a small reward (1 s). Acute administration of buspirone (0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 mg/kg i.p.) did not attenuate the contrast effect, as opposed to that observed for diazepam (1 mg/kg i.p.). The highest dose of buspirone used, however, did interfere with the learning of the avoidance response itself. Chronic buspirone (20 days, 0.5 and 0.75 mg/kg i.p.) did not have any effect on successive negative contrast either. Overall, these results could suggest that the 5-HT 1A receptor is not involved in the negative contrast effect studied, quite different to that observed for the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system. The findings are compared to results obtained with animal models selectively sensitive to some anxiolytic drugs, as are the so-called ‘conflict models’.

Effects of buspirone and gepirone on i.v. cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys.

Buspirone and gepirone were evaluated as potential pharmacotherapies for cocaine abuse by studying the effects of acute and repeated treatment on IV cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Chlorpromazine was also evaluated as a positive control. Effects of IV drug pretreatments were tested during daily 60-min sessions with lever-pressing reinforced under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of 0.02 or 0.05 mg/kg cocaine infusions. Acute pretreatment with buspirone (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, IV) increased rates of cocaine self-administration without disrupting food pellet consumption. Some doses of buspirone also produced changes in rates of cocaine self-administration without altering the within-session pattern of responding. In contrast, acute doses of gepirone had little effect on rates of cocaine self-administration, while disruptions in food consumption and changes in the within-session pattern of cocaine self-administration were obtained at the highest dose of gepirone tested (1.0 mg/kg). When either buspirone (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, IV) or gepirone (0.1 mg/kg, IV) were administered daily for 10 days, consistent effects on cocaine self-administration were not observed. Thus, the effects of acute buspirone administration on cocaine-maintained behavior were similar to the effects produced by chlorpromazine and other dopaminergic antagonists, whereas, gepirone was ineffective. These results provide some support for further evaluation of buspirone as a potential pharmacotherapy for cocaine abuse, although its lack of efficacy with repeated treatment is not encouraging. The negative results with gepirone provide less rationale for continued investigations with this drug, possibly because of its lesser involvement than buspirone with dopaminergic neurotransmission.

Pharmacodynamic effects of buspirone and clobazam.

1. The pharmacodynamic effects of buspirone and clobazam were compared in two volunteer studies. Acute doses of buspirone 5 mg, 10 mg and clobazam 10 mg were contrasted with placebo and a verum (lorazepam 1 mg), in a repeated measures design with 10 subjects assessed on a battery of psychometric tests at 1.5, 3.5, and 5.5 h post dose. For the combined results clobazam and the lower dose of buspirone (5 mg) were significantly contrasted with lorazepam on measures of subjective sedation, memory and choice reaction time (CRT). The higher dose of buspirone was not statistically different from lorazepam for all measures except memory; whilst contrasting significantly with placebo and clobazam on movement and total reaction time components respectively. Though failing to achieve significance, a similar trend was seen for critical flicker fusion (CFF) with buspirone 10 mg and lorazepam producing the lowest scores indicative of increased sedation. 2. Repeated doses of buspirone 5 mg twice daily, clobazam 10 mg twice daily, or placebo twice daily for 8 consecutive days were compared on the same battery of psychometric tests in a repeated measures design. Nine subjects were assessed on days 1, 3, and 8 of the study. Overall, memory performance significantly decreased with buspirone 5 mg in contrast to both clobazam and placebo whilst the opposite trend was seen with CFF. Clobazam significantly improved TRT in contrast to both placebo and buspirone. 3. These results indicate improved reaction time and memory performance with repeated dosing of clobazam in contrast to buspirone. Impairment following acute administration of buspirone appears limited to the higher (10 mg) dose.

Behavioral effects of chronic buspirone administration in the pigeon: Comparison to midazolam

The effects of acute and chronic administration of buspirone and midazolam were examined in White Carneau pigeons (N = 5) responding under a fixed-ratio 30 (FR 30) schedule of food presentation. Each drug was studied in all pigeons. For three pigeons, buspirone was studied before midazolam, while the order was reversed for the other two subjects. For each drug, a dose-response curve was determined before (prechronic) and two weeks after (postchronic) discontinuation of chronic administration. Prior to chronic drug administration, buspirone (0.3–5.6 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.1–3.0 mg/kg) decreased response rates in all subjects, in a dose-dependent manner. Midazolam was more potent than buspirone; midazolam's ED 50 (95% C.I.) was 0.53 (0.41–0.69) mg/kg compared to 2.55 (1.48–4.41) mg/kg for buspirone. For each subject, the lowest dose that decreased responding by at least 50% was administered daily, immediately before the session, for up to 6 weeks. At the lowest daily dose of buspirone, complete recovery of baseline rates was observed in 3 pigeons. However, when the buspirone dose was increased, responding remained below control rates in all but one pigeon. During chronic midazolam administration, tolerance developed to the rate-decreasing effects of midazolam in 4 subjects. When saline was substituted for buspirone or midazolam, suppressed responding returned to predrug rates in all subjects. When the dose-response curves were redetermined, the postchronic ED 50 for buspirone was 3.79 (2.10–6.82) mg/kg, which was not significantly different from the prechronic ED 50, suggesting that tolerance did not develop to buspirone's rate-decreasing effects. However, the midazolam dose-response curve was shifted to the right after chronic midazolam administration, with an ED 50 of 1.18 (0.81–1.72) mg/kg. Thus, while the behavioral effects of acute administration of buspirone and midazolam were similar, the development of tolerance, as determined from shifts in acute dose-response curves and recovery of drug-free response rates during daily administration, was substantially less for buspirone compared to midazolam. Further, consistent with clinical reports, no evidence of withdrawal was seen when daily buspirone treatments were discontinued.