Acuity Tool Research Articles

Neonatal acuity tool-defined staffing ratios in a tertiary Australian neonatal intensive care unit.

There is well-established data linking the adequacy of nurse staffing to patient outcomes. Evidence-based standards for staffing are therefore critical to drive improvements in clinical care. One such evidence-based approach is the use of patient acuity-based tools. The objective of this study is to determine the performance of a neonatal acuity tool in an Australian tertiary neonatal health-care setting, focusing on the classification of patient acuity and nursing:patient staffing ratios compared to current practice. Acuity data were collected in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and special care baby unit (SCBU) over a 10-week period in 2023. Patient data were scored in the 16 domains at two time points (prior to morning and evening nursing shift changeover) for all admitted newborns. For ventilated newborns nursed with a nurse:patient staffing ratio of 1:1, 78% of scores were within the L4-high acuity (score ≥ 26) band, with the remaining scores within the L3-high acuity (18-25) band. For newborns on non-invasive respiratory support in NICU staffed 1:1, the proportion scoring within the L4 acuity band was higher in the nasal high-flow group compared to the nasal continuous positive airway pressure group (P = 0.032), an effect not seen for those nursed 1:2 in NICU or for those on nasal high-flow nursed in SCBU either 1:2 or 1:3. This study of how a neonatal acuity classification system compares with current nurse:patient staffing allocations in an Australian tertiary NICU, suggests refinements in staffing ratios for specific patient groups on respiratory support are possible.

Objective acuity measures for infusion therapy staffing: A predictive model approach—Phase I.

e13553 Background: Acuity is a measure of the complexity of patient care and an estimate of nursing workload. The use of acuity tools is shown to improve care standards, nurse satisfaction and productivity. Existing acuity tools have barriers to adoption, including increased nursing workload, estimate variations among different nurses and clinical care settings, and poor understanding of validity of acuity measures. We aim to build a predictive model for prospectively determining acuity levels and staffing requirements in infusion therapy to address these gaps. This project will be implemented with a phased approach. Here we describe Phase I, to establish a standard measure and documentation process for acuity, then collect and analyze a large data set to quantify the relationship of acuity scores to selected patient characteristics. Methods: A US Oncology Network nursing committee developed evidence-based guidelines for acuity measurement and documentation in August 2023. Nine sites from four independent, community oncology practices were selected to perform acuity rating and documentation using the developed guidelines. Multiple training sessions on the guidelines were conducted with nurses from selected sites. Nurses documented acuity scores (level 1~6) and start time for patients’ infusion visits in the EHR 8/30/2023 – 11/30/2023. Acuity documentation rates were calculated and provided to each site weekly to gain feedback and engagement. Acuity scores were extracted from the electronic health record using natural language processing. Structured data on potential predictors including patient demographics, performance status, lab, and treatment-related information were also collected. Results: A total of 14,610 infusion room visits (5,139 distinct patients) with documented acuity scores were reported. The acuity documentation rate from each site was consistent by week and ranged 60 – 96%. Table reports prevalence of select features by acuity score. Conclusions: An operational workflow was successfully implemented to collect and analyze acuity scores and relevant features. Features of interest include chemotherapy Cycle 1 Day 1, five or more drugs and highly emetogenic treatment. In Phase II, the collected acuity scores and clinical features will be used to build a predictive model to objectively estimate acuity. Phase III will focus on the deployment of the predictive model to oncology practices. [Table: see text]

Proposed task shifting integrated with telemedicine to address uncorrected refractive error in Kenya: Delphi study

BackgroundDeveloping countries such as Kenya still experience challenges around human resource to deliver refractive error services. However, given the burden of uncorrected refractive error, adoption of innovative and cost effective approaches is desirable. Hence this study intended to develop a task shifting framework integrated with telemedicine to potentially scale refractive error services.MethodsThis was an exploratory study conducted in four phases as follows: a scoping review of the scope of practice for ophthalmic workers in Kenya, an interview with key opinion leaders on the need for integration of public health approaches such as the vision corridors within the eye health ecosystem in Kenya and their knowledge on task shifting, and finally development and validation of a proposed task shifting framework through a Delphi technique. Purposive sampling was used to recruit key opinion leaders and data was collected via telephonic interviews. The qualitative data was analyzed thematically using NVivo Software, Version 11.ResultsThe scoping review showed that only optometrists, ophthalmologists and ophthalmic clinical officers are allowed to undertake refraction in Kenya. All of the key opinion leaders (100%) were aware of task shifting and agreed that it is suitable for adoption within the eye health ecosystem in Kenya. All of the key opinion leaders (100%) agreed that skills development for healthcare workers without prior training on eye health supervised by optometrists through telemedicine is desirable. Notwithstanding, all of the key opinion leaders (100%) agreed that integration of public health approaches such as the vision corridors across all levels of healthcare delivery channels and development of a self-assessment visual acuity tool is desirable. Finally all of the key opinion leaders (100%) agreed that task shifting is relevant for adoption within the eye health ecosystem in Kenya. The developed framework prioritized partnership, advocacy, skills development, establishment and equipping of refraction points. The proposed framework advocated for a telemedicine between professionals with conventional training and those with skills development.ConclusionTask shifting integrated with telemedicine could cost effectively scale refractive error service delivery. However, internal and external factors may hinder the success warranting the need for a multi-faceted interventions and a connection between planning and training to scale the uptake.

Developing a haemodialysis acuity tool (the HAT study): A qualitative study.

Haemodialysis units are now managing an increasing number of patients with varying needs and levels of acuity. To maintain safety, haemodialysis patients must be placed in the most appropriate dialysis unit that has the required human and physical resources to care for them. The first step towards achieving these goals is to develop a tool specific to haemodialysis units to effectively measure patient acuity. To develop a haemodialysis acuity tool, utilising a focus group approach, in assessing patient's suitability for a specific dialysis location thus ensuring patient safety. This is a cross-sectional qualitative study via a focus group approach. Participants were nurse unit managers and team leaders of a District Renal Service. Participants were interviewed to explore their views on the elements and measures identified in the research aims. Themes for interviews were informed by current literature on acuity tools for haemodialysis patients' admission to the dialysis units. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and progressively analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Ten nurse unit managers/team leaders (100%) were interviewed and thematic analysis of the transcripts was conducted utilising the deductive approach. Five themes were identified which will form the main categories in the development of the tool, namely: Age/frailty; co-morbidity; physical; dialysis; and psychosocial. This study is instrumental in the development of the haemodialysis acuity tool which can be used in allocating dialysis location specific to patient's needs and available resources. The tool can also be used in analysing patient care processes and resource requirements based on the patients' and unit's profile.

Implementation of a Patient Acuity Tool and Safe Staffing Model in an Outpatient Oncology Clinical Trials Unit.

Appropriate staffing in the outpatient oncology setting contributes to the delivery of quality care. Objective measures of acuity and nursing workload can assist with developing staffing models; however, measuring acuity in a.

Assessment of a Unit-Level Acuity Tool in Inpatient Psychiatry.

Assessing acuity is deemed essential to staffing in intensive care nursing; however, it has not received sufficient attention in inpatient psychiatry, where acuity can fluctuate greatly within shifts. Staffing and admission decisions rely on the accuracy of this information. The current mixed methods study surveyed nurses from two hospitals within the same hospital system: one using an acuity tool and one naïve to acuity tools. The survey was followed by a focus group on the specific factors influencing acuity and nurses' assessment of needs. Results suggest that the current tool is not satisfactory for nurses who use it to help with staffing or admission decisions and it is not user-friendly. Most nurses from both hospitals indicated they would prefer an electronic version with automated features reflecting up-to-date patient and unit acuity that would assist in interprofessional collaborative admissions decisions and staffing. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 62(1), 13-18.].

Examining Nurse and Patient Factors Before and After Implementing an Oncology Acuity Tool: A Mixed Methods Study.

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the nurse documentation compliance, pressure injury compliance, and fall prevention compliance before and after implementing an oncology acuity tool (OAT) at a specialized cancer center in Jordan. Methods: A mixed methods design was used. A qualitative approach was employed using a semistructured interview with 15 nurses selected by purposive sampling. In contrast, the quantitative approach included pre- and postdata obtained to identify the role of adopting the OAT in improving nursing documentation and applying fall and pressure injury-prevention precaution measures. Results: The thematic analysis developed seven themes, including oncology acuity score (OAS) and assignment processes, OAS and patient outcomes, OAS and nurse outcomes, limitations of the OAT, driving forces, restraining forces, and recommendations or suggestions. The results showed significant improvements in nursing documentation (p =.0385), application of pressure injury (p ≤ .00001), and falling precaution measures (p ≤ .00001). Conclusion: Nurse assignment, nursing compliance, and patients' and nurses' outcomes improved after utilizing the OAT.

Development of a Couplet Care Acuity Tool

Development of a Couplet Care Acuity Tool

Engaging Frontline Nurses in Building an Electronic Workload Acuity Tool

Nursing leadership and nursing informaticists engaged bedside nurses in the design, build, and evaluation of the Nursing Workload Acuity tool, which produced a robust evaluation process and seamless implementation of an acuity tool embedded in the electronic health record. The tool uses existing data elements from the electronic health record that are mapped to rules to produce a dynamic score. Bedside nurses evaluated content, points, and scoring, which confirmed the acuity tool included necessary elements and matched nursing perception of workload greater than 90% consistently.

Implementing a patient acuity tool: Perceived effectiveness for more equitable staff assignments.

This study aimed to assess the acceptability, relevance, and effectiveness of a patient acuity tool (PAT) among part-time and full-time RNs. A pre- and post-test intervention was used to evaluate a PAT among part-time and full-time RNs on a 28-bed telemetry unit at a Magnet®-designated hospital. An eight-item PAT questionnaire measured nurse acceptability. Relevance was evaluated using the RN Opinion of Relevance of Concepts of the PAT Questionnaire, and effectiveness was evaluated using the RN Opinion of Effectiveness of the PAT Questionnaire. A total of 22/33 (66.6%) RNs participated and completed the PAT questionnaire that measured nurse acceptability of the PAT assessment process. Statistically significant differences were demonstrated between two out of eight variables pre-post intervention; "the way we currently evaluate patient acuity assists the charge nurse in making nurse-patient assignments" (t 3.070, df 22, P = .006), "the way we currently evaluate patient acuity is an accurate assessment of acuity" (t 2.390, df 22, P = .026). Acuity tools should be specific for a nursing unit and adapt to staffing and patient needs, which can include a change in a patient's condition, unexpected discharges and/or admissions, and psychosocial components.

Which hematology/oncology patients are high priority for ambulatory clinical pharmacist review? A three-round Delphi survey by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Prioritization and acuity tools have been leveraged to facilitate targeted and efficient clinical pharmacist interventions. However, there is a lack of established pharmacy-specific acuity factors in the ambulatory hematology/oncology setting. Therefore, National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Pharmacy Directors Forum conducted a survey to establish consensus on acuity factors associated with hematology/oncology patients that are high priority for ambulatory clinical pharmacist review. A three-round electronic Delphi survey was conducted. During the first round, respondents were asked an open-ended question to suggest acuity factors based on their expert opinion. Respondents were then asked in the second round to agree or disagree with the compiled acuity factors, in which those with ≥75% agreement were included in the third round. The final consensus was defined as a mean score ≥3.33 on a modified 4-point Likert scale (4 = strongly agree, 1 = strongly disagree) during the third round. A total of 124 hematology/oncology clinical pharmacists completed the first round of the Delphi survey (invitation response rate, 36.7%), of which 103 completed the second round (response rate, 83.1%) and 84 the third round (response rate, 67.7%). A final consensus was achieved for 18 acuity factors. Acuity factors were identified in the following themes: antineoplastic regimen characteristics, drug interactions, organ dysfunction, pharmacogenomics, recent discharge, laboratory parameters, and treatment-related toxicities. This Delphi panel of 124 clinical pharmacists achieved consensus on 18 acuity factors that would identify a hematology/oncology patient as a high priority for ambulatory clinical pharmacist review. The research team envisions incorporating these acuity factors into a pharmacy-specific electronic scoring tool.

Acuity Tools for the Antepartum and Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

To evaluate content validity and interrater reliability for acuity tools developed for the antepartum and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patient population. Antepartum and NICU acuity tools were developed to better evaluate nurse staffing assignment equity and patient needs. Following several iterations with staff nurses and nurse leaders, content validity of the acuity tools was established via a panel of experts in each substantive area using the Content Validity Index. The final tools were then evaluated for interrater reliability using Intraclass Correlation. Content validity for the Antepartum Acuity Tool was S-CVI/Ave = 0.87 and for the NICU Acuity Tool was S-CVI/Ave = 0.98. Interrater Reliability for the Antepartum Acuity tool was ICC = 0.88, and the NICU Acuity Tool was ICC = 0.95. These tools have established content validity and interrater reliability and are appropriate for use in the antepartum and NICU settings to determine patient acuity and promote appropriate nurse-to-patient assignments.

Acuity Tools for the Antepartum and Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Acuity Tools for the Antepartum and Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Effects of Implementing an Acuity Tool on a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit.

Staff shortages, reduced budgets, and high acuity of violent psychiatric patients can create challenges in psychiatric intensive care units (PICUs). Staffing of the psychiatric unit was based on patient census rather than evidence-based practices. A pre-/postintervention design was used to examine changes in nursing satisfaction and patient outcomes as measured with the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) survey results. A psychiatric specific acuity tool was implemented on the PICU of a Veterans Administration hospital. After an initial decrease related to the COVID-19 pandemic, total acuity and the total number of nurses remained relatively stable while the unit census declined. NDNQI survey results improved with the largest being a 52-percentile increase for the quality-of-care summary measure. An acuity tool can help standardize practice, determine fair patient assignments among staff, increase nurse satisfaction, and promote best practices for patient safety.

A Hospital's Roadmap for Improving Nursing Excellence Using AACN's Healthy Work Environment Standards.

A Hospital's Roadmap for Improving Nursing Excellence Using AACN's Healthy Work Environment Standards.

Impact of implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index on patients presenting with severe hypertension

Severe hypertension remains one of the leading preventable causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Timeliness to response to severe hypertension in pregnancy is a crucial quality indicator tracked by state and national organizations. We hypothesized that the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index, a validated acuity tool, would improve care performance in women with severe hypertension in an urban, inner-city hospital setting. This study aimed to assess the impact of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index on the management of women presenting with severe preeclampsia diagnosed by severe hypertension as measured by time to provider assessment, administration of magnesium sulfate, and immediate administration of acute antihypertensives. This was a prospective, observational study of pregnant women presenting to the labor and delivery triage unit with severe preeclampsia diagnosed by severe hypertension giving birth at a large urban inner-city academic facility before (epoch 1: January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019) and after (epoch 2: March 1, 2021, to September 31, 2021) the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. Baseline outcomes of time to assessment, time to magnesium sulfate prophylaxis, and time to antihypertensive medication administration before the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index were assessed. The Maternal-Fetal Triage Index tool was implemented on March 1, 2021, following standardized education in 2020 for all triage nurses, unit technicians, healthcare unit coordinators, and healthcare providers. Time to assessment, administration of magnesium sulfate prophylaxis, and time to antihypertensive administration after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index were compared with measures before the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank-sum test with P<.05 considered significant when comparing epoch 1 with epoch2. A total of 370 patients were admitted with severe hypertension in 2019 before the use of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index, and 254 patients were admitted with severe hypertension in 2021 after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index. There was no difference between epochs across baseline characteristics, including age, race and ethnicity, parity, and body mass index. After the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index was implemented, the time to provider assessment was significantly improved, from a median time of 44 minutes (interquartile range, 0-65) in epoch 1 to 17 minutes (interquartile range, 0-39) in epoch 2 (P<.001). Furthermore, the time from arrival to magnesium sulfate prophylaxis was significantly faster with a median time of 161 minutes (interquartile range, 109-256) in epoch 1 vs 127 minutes (interquartile range, 85-258) in epoch 2 (P=.001). Moreover, there was a decrease in the time from arrival to antihypertensive medication administration for severe blood pressures after the implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index (101 minutes [interquartile range, 61-177] vs 66 minutes [interquartile range, 35-203]; P<.001). The implementation of the Maternal-Fetal Triage Index at a large urban inner-city hospital was associated with improved timeliness of assessment and treatment of women with severe hypertension. The Maternal-Fetal Triage Index is a viable tool to improve the efficiency in triage units, specifically in the management of severe hypertension.

An Innovative Approach for the Development of an Early Phase Research Unit

<strong>Background:</strong> Moving cancer outcomes forward is interdependent on increased participation in clinical trials. There is an increasing need in ambulatory oncology to develop formal structures which enable participation in complex research studies. <strong>Purpose:</strong> There was a lack of standardization in operationalizing care delivery for patients participating in complex trials in our Cancer Center, therefore a formal structure was needed. This project describes the framework for development, implementation, and sustainment of our early-phase research infusion unit (EPRU). Approach: Dedicated space, as well as a core team of nurses in the infusion area was identified. Workflow processes and standard operating procedures were initiated. Standard educational requirements and research-focused competency facilitated training compliance. Electronic data reports showed volume trends and along with an acuity tool supported staffing guidelines. <strong>Outcomes:</strong> Standardization of processes fostered adherence to research protocol requirements while accommodating increased complex research protocols and volume of patients. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Nurses’ professional development is paramount to safe quality care of patients participating in clinical trials. Using an acuity tool to appropriately allocate resources, allows for accommodating increased complexity and volume. Systematizing processes fosters adherence to protocol requirements.

Refinement of the Intensive Care Unit Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes III Acuity Tool.

The Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (CAMEO) acuity tool quantifies patient acuity in terms of nursing cognitive workload complexity. The aim of this study was to refine the ICU CAMEO II acuity tool. An expert panel of nursing staff from 4 pediatric ICUs convened to refine the CAMEO II across a large, freestanding children's hospital in the United States. This study used a modified Delphi technique. Through a series of 4 Delphi rounds, the expert panel identified Domains of Care and nursing care items that were suitable to be collapsed or bundled. The number of Domains of Care decreased from 18 to 10. Each of the expert panel members then completed the ICU CAMEO II tool and the newly revised tool, ICU CAMEO III, on 5 to 10 patients. Sixty completed ICU CAMEO II tools, and ICU CAMEO III tools were available for comparison. The average difference of the 2 tools' total scores was 5 points (minimum, 4; maximum, 7). The level of agreement between the 2 tools by CAMEO Complexity Classification level (I-V) was 90%. The ICU CAMEO III acuity tool is a streamlined measure to describe and quantify the acuity of pediatric critical care nursing. Use of this acuity measure will support projection of staffing models, staffing assignments, and benchmarking across pediatric ICUs. Further research is underway to validate the CAMEO III for multisite use.

Discussion Guide for the Connor Article.

Discussion Guide for the Connor Article.

Measuring Acuity and Pediatric Critical Care Nursing Workload by Using ICU CAMEO III.

The Intensive Care Unit Complexity Assessment and Monitoring to Ensure Optimal Outcomes (ICU CAMEO III) acuity tool measures patient acuity in terms of the complexity of nursing cognitive workload. To validate the ICU CAMEO III acuity tool in US children's hospitals. Using a convenience sample, 9 sites enrolled children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (ICUs). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient, nursing, and unit characteristics. Concurrent validity was evaluated by correlating the ICU CAMEO III with the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-Children (TISS-C) and the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III (PRISM III). Patients (N = 840) were enrolled from 15 units (7 cardiac and 8 mixed pediatric ICUs). The mean number of ICU beds was 23 (range, 12-34). Among the patients, 512 (61%) were diagnosed with cardiac and 328 (39%) with noncardiac conditions; 463 patients (55.1%) were admitted for medical reasons, and 377 patients (44.9%) were surgical. The ICU CAMEO III median score was 99 (range, 59-163). The ICU CAMEO complexity classification was determined for all 840 patients: 60 (7.1%) with level I complexity; 183 (21.8%) with level II; 201 (23.9%), level III; 267 (31.8%), level IV; and 129 (15.4%), level V. Strong correlation was found between ICU CAMEO III and both TISS-C (ρ = .822, P < .001) and PRISM III (ρ = .607, P < .001) scores, and between the CAMEO complexity classifications and the PRISM III categories (ρ = .575, P = .001). The ICU CAMEO III acuity tool and CAMEO complexity classifications are valid measures of patient acuity and nursing cognitive workload compared with PRISM III and TISS-C in academic children's hospitals.