Actual Treatment Costs Research Articles

Estimated Costs of 4-Month Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment Regimen, United States.

We estimated direct costs of a 4-month or 6-month regimen for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis treatment in the United States. Costs were $23,000 per person treated. Actual treatment costs will vary depending on examination and medication charges, as well as expenses associated with directly observed therapy.

Analysis of Actual Costs and Compliance with the INA-CBGS Tariff for Inpatient Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital, Surakarta In 2018

Nasopharyngeal cancer is a type of head and neck cancer. According to Globocan data in 2018, it is estimated that there were approximately 17,992 new cases and 11,204 deaths related to this type of cancer. The high incidence and mortality rates, as well as the high actual treatment costs, are the main factors behind the establishment of the National Health Insurance program through the Indonesian Case Base Groups (INA-CBGs) package. However, the INA-CBGs tariff may not always align with the actual costs, leading to cost discrepancies. The objective of this study was to determine the compatibility of actual costs with the INA-CBGs tariff and the factors associated with the actual costs for nasopharyngeal cancer patients at Dr. Moewardi Regional General Hospital in Surakarta. This research utilized an observational study design with a cross-sectional approach from the hospital's perspective. Retrospective data were collected from medical records and patient claims files of the National Health Insurance (BPJS) for nasopharyngeal cancer patients in 2018. Data analysis was conducted using the one-sample t-test to compare the average actual costs with the INA-CBGs tariff. Correlation analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the actual costs. The novelty of this study compared to previous research lies in the object of study, sample size, research period, data, and different conditions from previous studies. The results of the study revealed that there were 54 patients undergoing chemotherapy with a total of 162 treatment episodes and 20 patients undergoing surgery with 21 treatment episodes. For chemotherapy under code C-4-13-I, a total negative difference of -Rp102,565,776 was found across 146 treatment episodes. In contrast, for chemotherapy under code C-4-13-II, a total positive difference of Rp26,972,439 was observed in 16 treatment episodes. As for surgery under code U-4-10-I, a total negative difference of -Rp7,420,989 was found across 4 treatment episodes, and for surgery under code U-4-10-II, a total positive difference of Rp177,572,067 was observed in 17 treatment episodes. Factors associated with the actual costs for chemotherapy were the length of stay (LOS), while for surgery, the factors included LOS, secondary diagnosis, procedure, and severity level, with a p-value < 0.05.

Potential Savings in Treatment Costs of COPD through Smoking Cessation: Modeling for DMP COPD in Germany - Scientific Action Group on Tobacco Cessation (WAT) e. V.

Zusammenfassung Basierend auf Real-life-Daten für die Stadien-Verteilung von COPD-Patienten (GOLD) und den faktischen Stadien-bezogenen Behandlungskosten innerhalb einer bundesweiten Kohortenstudie (COSYCONET) 1 wird modellhaft für das Szenario einer Reduktion der Raucher-Quote in dieser Patientengruppe von 26 % um 10 %-Punkte auf 16 % ermittelt, welchen Einfluss die reduzierte Raucher-Quote auf die Behandlungskosten haben dürfte. Zugrunde gelegt wird die Annahme, dass bei herabgesetzter Raucher-Quote leichtere Stadien (I/II) stärker repräsentiert sind, während sich höhere und kostenintensivere Stadien (III/IV) proportional verkleinern. Die Intervention zur Erreichung der Tabakabstinenz wird für die überschlägigen Modell-Berechnungen kalkuliert mit den typischen Kosten einer leitlinienkonformen Behandlung durch Nutzung eines verhaltenstherapeutischen Gruppen-Entwöhnungs-Programmes und der parallel eingesetzten medikamentösen Unterstützung 2 3 . Im Ergebnis zeigt sich die mögliche Absenkung der Fallkosten um 10,5 %, wobei reduzierte Kosten bei Komorbiditäten nicht berücksichtigt sind.

Implementation of an Environmentally Friendly Approach of a Hospital–Practice of Medical Waste Disposal

Gama Hospital is a well-known private hospital in Taiwan. In addition to medical treatment technology, hospital management and cost control are also excellent. Regarding the treatment of medical waste, one must consider the cost and also the environmental implications. Waste disposal, besides the inevitable treatment after its emergence, should be given more attention during the course of medical execution. In the practice of the hospital, the actual waste treatment cost was reduced. The main factor is that the hospital promotes a series of waste treatment education and training. In addition to medical personnel, patients and family members also participate in medical waste reduction and correct handling activities, successfully completing the hospital’s waste reduction target and achieving sustainable environmental social responsibility.

Efficacy and cost-effectivity analysis of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy unit in infectious disease clinical practices: Turkey perspective.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (OPAT) has become a common treatment modality in developed countries. OPAT units are not widespread in Turkey, and their cost-effectivity analysis has not been studied, yet. To analyze the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the OPAT unit, based on a 1000-bed teaching hospital. The records of patients, who were treated between October 2013 and December 2017, in an OPAT unit of a tertiary hospital in Ankara, were obtained retrospectively. The cost that would arise if the patients were hospitalized for the same treatment period with the same diagnosis was calculated and compared with the actual treatment cost of the patients in the OPAT unit. A total of 594 patients who received antimicrobial treatment at the OPAT unit were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 55.39±16.37years and 313 (52.7%) were males. Based on the end-of-treatment goals, 98.5% of the patients reached the treatment goal. An indirect cost analysis revealed that the OPAT unit was 487.62594 TL/129.00878 $ less costly than inpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment. In other words, OPAT cost was 75% of the equivalent inpatient costs. It was also determined that a total of 7078 bed days and 11.9 bed days per person were saved. OPAT units should be expanded increasingly in Turkey. The evaluation together with the health care system conditions in Turkey revealed that the OPAT program is safe, effective, and cost-efficient.

Real-world burden of myelosuppression in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Retrospective, longitudinal data analysis.

e19300 Background: Myelosuppression is a common side effect of chemotherapy (CT) that can compromise patient (pt) and economic outcomes. To evaluate the overall burden of myelosuppression, a longitudinal, patterns of care analysis was conducted among pts with SCLC treated with CT in routine clinical practice. Methods: Data were obtained from Providence St. Joseph Health electronic medical records between Jan 2016 and Dec 2019. Hematologic adverse events, treatment patterns, and hospital-based healthcare resource utilization and costs were assessed during the 12 months from first diagnosis of SCLC in pts who had CT-induced grade 3/4 myelosuppression in 1st or 1st/2nd/3rd-line (1/2/3L) treatment settings. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize key findings. Costs of care were calculated from actual treatment costs for inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room services after first diagnosis and treatment with CT. Professional billing was not included due to variability in physician employment by the system. Results: 347 pts were eligible for analysis; mean age (SD) was 66 (9.0) years, 49% were female, and 89% were Caucasian. Prominent comorbidities included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (52%), diabetes (23%), and peripheral vascular disease (20%). 264 pts (76%) received 1L treatment only, while an additional 83 pts (24%) had both 1L and 2/3L treatment. Of 339 evaluable pts with longitudinal laboratory data, grade 3/4 cytopenias were reported as follows: 45%, neutropenia; 41%, anemia; and 25%, thrombocytopenia. 43% and 15% of pts received red blood cell or platelet transfusions, respectively. 49% of pts received prophylaxis (6%) or treatment (43%) with G-CSF, and 4% of pts were treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Average total costs of care (post initial-diagnosis and treatment) for pts without grade 3/4 hematologic events (n = 110) were $67,802 per pt throughout the 12 months’ follow-up. On average, annual per pt costs for those with grade 3/4 hematologic events were $131,047 for neutropenia, $95,954 for anemia, and $90,053 for thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: A large and meaningful proportion of pts had grade 3/4 myelosuppression with annual incremental associated costs per pt ranging from $22,251 for pts with thrombocytopenia to $63,245 for pts with neutropenia. Despite the availability of protocols of care and various rescue treatments, CT-induced myelosuppression places a significant real-world burden on pts and the healthcare system.

Cost-comparison analysis of a multiplatform tumour profiling service to guide advanced cancer treatment

BackgroundTumor profiling is increasingly used in advanced cancer patients to define treatment options, especially in refractory cases where no standard treatment is available. Caris Molecular Intelligence (CMI) is a multiplatform tumor profiling service that is comprehensive of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA and RNA, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridisation (FISH). The aim of this study is to compare costs of CMI-guided treatment with prior or planned treatment options in correlation with outcome results.MethodsRetrospective data from five clinical trials were collected to define the treatment decision prior to the receipt of the CMI report (n = 137 patients). A systematic review of treatment data from 11 clinical studies of CMI (n = 385 patients) allowed a comparison of planned vs actual (n = 137) and prior vs actual (n = 229) treatment costs.ResultsTreatment plan was changed in 88% of CMI-profiled cases. The actual CMI guided treatment cost per cycle was £995 in 385 treated patients. Planned treatment costs were comparable to actual treatment costs (£979 vs £945; p = 0.7123) and prior treatment costs were not significantly different to profiling-guided treatments (£892 vs £850; p = 0.631).ConclusionsCaris Molecular Intelligence guided treatment cost per cycle was in the range of prior or planned treatment cost/cycle. Due to beneficial overall survival the additional cost of performing CMI’s multiplatform testing to the treatment costs seems to be cost-effective.

Cost and time savings of subcutaneous trastuzumab (SC-T) in a public health system in Mexico.

e18387 Background: The subcutaneous presentation of trastuzumab has been recently incorporated into the treatment regimen of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). Its use has been associated with cost savings and reduced chair time, being especially suitable for public health systems. Aim: To estimate the cost savings of the use of SC-T compared to intravenous trastuzumab (IV-T) according to patient weight, and calculate the infusion time of SC-T in a tertiary healthcare facility at TecSalud from Feb 2018 - Jan 2019. Methods: From a total of 2068 oncological treatments, 756 corresponded to SC-T, either alone or concomitantly with chemotherapy (CT). For cost estimation, we considered $1,103 USD per SC-T vial, $1,162 USD per IV-T vial and $2.6 USD per mg of IV-T, as per governmental rates. We compared the actual treatment cost of 600 mg fixed SC-T dose with the hypothetical cost of administering IV-T at a dose of 6 mg/kg, considering its price per vial and per mg. The total time of SC-T infusion was reported. Results: Median patient weight for the 756 reported SC-T treatments was 72 kg (45 - 127 kg). Of these, 561 consisted of SC-T alone; and 56% had adjuvant, 34% neoadjuvant and 10% palliative intent. The estimated cost of the 756 doses of SC-T was $833,500 USD. Considering patients’ weight, 46% of the infusion treatments would have required 2 IV-T vials, with a total of 1105 vials and an absolute cost of $1,282,374 USD. Likewise, if cost per mg of IV-T is examined, we would have used 338,744 mg of IV-T, with an estimated cost of $894,284 USD. Approximate savings of SC-T use would reach $448,874 USD per vial payment and $60,784 USD per mg payment. The median time of SC-T only infusion was of 3 minutes (1 - 20 minutes); and no adverse effects were documented during its administration. Conclusions: The SC-T fixed dose (irrespectively of patients’ weight) results in significant practical and financial advantages as weight-adjusted dosing is not required. This is specially relevant in countries like Mexico, where > 70% of BC patients are overweight/obese, requiring higher doses of IV-T and resulting in greater expenses. Thus, the use of SC-T not only offers greater convenience to patients, but also reduces overall healthcare costs compared to standard IV infusion.

The Value of Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare for Adolescent Substance Users with Comorbid Conditions.

The damage inflicted on our society by mental health and substance use issues is reaching epidemic proportions with few signs of abating. One new and innovative strategy for addressing these comorbid issues has been the development of outdoor behavioral healthcare (OBH). This study compared the effectiveness of three post-acute adolescent substance use situations: OBH, treatment as usual (TAU), and no structured treatment (NST). The simulated target population was 13-17 years old with comorbid substance use and mental health issues. When costs were adjusted for actual completion rates of 94% in OBH, 37% in TAU, and $0 for NST, the actual treatment costs per person were $27 426 for OBH and $31 113 for TAU. OBH also had a cost–benefit ratio of 60.4% higher than TAU, an increased Quality in Life Years (QALY) life span, societal benefits of an additional $36 100, and 424% better treatment outcomes as measured by the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (YOQ) research instrument.

The cost implications of palliative radiation therapy dose and fractionation for painful metastatic bone lesions.

145 Background: Palliative radiation treatment (pRT) is used for symptomatic bone metastases (mets). Several fractionation schedules show equal efficacy for pain relief, and ASTRO’s Choosing Wisely recommends 8Gy x1, 4Gy x5, or 3Gy x10. This study aims to investigate the cost implications of pRT for bone mets. Methods: Patients (Pts) treated with pRT for bone mets at Mayo Clinic from 2007 - 2016 were included in this study. Costs for all services were subdivided into RT and total costs at 30 & 90 days (30D & 90D). Standardized costs were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Cost Data Warehouse and Medicare reimbursements were assigned to all services with cost to charge adjustments and 2017 GDP Implicit Price Deflator for inflation. Cost means were compared via the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: 538 pts were treated with pRT, 124 receiving 8Gy x1, 204 receiving 4Gy x5, and 210 receiving 3Gy x10. Pts with breast and prostate cancer were most likely to be treated with 3Gy x10 and pts with GI and lung cancer were most likely to be treated with 8Gy x1. RT costs at 30D were $1,497, $1,891, and $1,982 (p=0.03) and RT costs at 90D were $2,602, $2,753, and $3,032 (p=0.08) for initial RT regimens of 8Gy x1, 4Gy x5, and 3Gy x10. Total costs of care at 30D were similar from $15,969 - 17,687 (p=0.6) and total costs at 90D were similar from $22,361 - 23,219 (p=0.7) between arms. A total of 23%, 28%, and 39% of pts were alive 2 years following pRT from each arm (p=0.07). Conclusions: This is the first study of its kind to analyze actual treatment costs for the three most common pRT regimens in bone mets. Single fraction RT was most used for pts with poor prognoses and was associated with lower RT costs at 30D, but similar RT costs at 90D, possibly due to retreatment. RT choice had no impact on overall costs of care at 30D or 90D. pRT remains of high value, representing only 11-13% of total costs.[Table: see text]

The direct cost of pressure injuries in an Australian residential aged care setting.

Pressure injuries have a negative effect on well-being and the cost of treatment places a significant burden on the health care system. Research has, however, tended to extrapolate or estimate the cost of pressure injuries resulting in uncertainty regarding the true cost of this condition. The aim of this prospective observational study was to quantify the cost of pressure injury treatment in the Australian residential aged care setting. An electronic health care record audit and observation of usual pressure injury treatment was undertaken with a sample of 20 participants who had 23 pressure injuries. The actual treatment cost, an evidence-based practice model cost, and a projected treatment cost were calculated. The overall cost of pressure injury treatment was AU$98,489.22. The average daily cost by pressure injury stage was AU$26.42 for a Stage 1 pressure injury, AU$37.17 for a Stage 2 pressure injury, AU$30.01 for a Stage 3 pressure injury, and AU$10.22 for an Unstageable pressure injury. The projected cost of treatment was AU$104,510.41. At 42 days this cost extended to AU$116,552.79. This study has quantified the cost of pressure injury treatment in a residential aged care setting. The study may inform future efforts to accurately calculate the cost of PIs and the effectiveness of strategies to reduce the economic burden of this condition.

Pilot study assessing the direct medical cost of treating patients with cancer in Kenya; findings and implications for the future

Background: Currently the majority of cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, where there are appreciable funding concerns. In Kenya, most patients currently pay out of pocket for treatment, and those who are insured are generally not covered for the full costs of treatment. This places a considerable burden on households if family members develop cancer. However, the actual cost of cancer treatment in Kenya is unknown. Such an analysis is essential to better allocate resources as Kenya strives towards universal healthcare.Objectives: To evaluate the economic burden of treating cancer patients.Method: Descriptive cross-sectional cost of illness study in the leading teaching and referral hospital in Kenya, with data collected from the hospital files of sampled adult patients for treatment during 2016.Results: In total, 412 patient files were reviewed, of which 63.4% (n = 261) were female and 36.6% (n = 151) male. The cost of cancer care is highly dependent on the modality. Most reviewed patients had surgery, chemotherapy and palliative care. The cost of cancer therapy varied with the type of cancer. Patients on chemotherapy alone cost an average of KES 138,207 (USD 1364.3); while those treated with surgery cost an average of KES 128,207 (1265.6), and those on radiotherapy KES 119,036 (1175.1). Some patients had a combination of all three, costing, on average, KES 333,462 (3291.8) per patient during the year.Conclusion: The cost of cancer treatment in Kenya depends on the type of cancer, the modality, cost of medicines and the type of inpatient admission. The greatest contributors are currently the cost of medicines and inpatient admissions. This pilot study can inform future initiatives among the government as well as private and public insurance companies to increase available resources, and better allocate available resources, to more effectively treat patients with cancer in Kenya. The authors will be monitoring developments and conducting further research.

PMD43 - Latest Insights on the Cost Efficiency of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Treating Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rapid-onset muscle weakness caused by the immune system damaging the peripheral nervous system. The disease can be treated with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) or with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Among neurologists and hospital executives, there is uncertainty about what is the most cost-efficient treatment for GBS. The intent of this research is to assess the latest insights on the cost-efficiency of TPE versus IVIG in the treatment of GBS. A systematic literature review was performed on the cost-efficiency of TPE in GBS by means of searches on PubMed as well as through the ISPOR Scientific Presentations Database. Publications were collected between 1999 and 2017. Fifteen relevant publications were identified between 1999 and 2017. In 11 out of the 15 cases, TPE was more cost-efficient than IVIG; in 3 cases, the studies were undecided; and in 1 case, IVIG was more cost-efficient than TPE. When TPE was more cost-efficient than IVIG, hospital costs were 53% lower on average. A weighted average across all publications showed potential average savings of 38% of hospital costs. The actual treatment costs largely depended on the severity of the disease, the hospital type, patient characteristics (for example, body mass index), and the country where the study was performed (data on file). Assuming equality in terms of patient characteristics and hospital type, TPE is more cost-efficient in the treatment of GBS than IVIG most of the time. In terms of the total treatment costs, savings between 15% and 83% are possible when TPE is applied versus IVIG. Health systems that foresee an increased use of TPE versus IVIG in the treatment of GBS are likely to experience cost savings.

The costs and outcomes of paediatric tuberculosis treatment at primary healthcare clinics in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Little up-to-date information is available about the costs of providing drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) treatment to paediatric patients in South Africa (SA), nor have actual costs incurred at clinics been compared with costs expected from guidelines. To estimate actual and guideline treatment costs by means of a retrospective cohort analysis. We report patient characteristics, outcomes and treatment costs from a retrospective cohort of paediatric and adolescent (<18years) DS-TB patients registered for treatment from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2013 at three primary healthcare clinics in Johannesburg, SA. Actual treatment costs in 2015 SA rands and US dollars were estimated from the provider perspective using a standard bottom-up microcosting approach and compared with an estimate of guideline costs. We enrolled 88 DS-TB patients (median age 4 years (interquartile range 1.0 - 9.5), 44.3% female, 22.7% HIV co-infected, 92.0% pulmonary TB). Treatment success was high (89.8%; 13.6% cured, 76.1% completed treatment), and the mean (standard deviation (SD)) cost per patient with treatment success was ZAR1 820/USD143 (ZAR593/USD46), comprising fixed costs (44.0%), outpatient visits (30.7%), medication (19.3%) and laboratory investigations (6.0%). This was 17% more than the mean (SD) cost estimated by applying treatment guidelines (ZAR1 553/USD122 (ZAR1 620/USD127)), with differences due mainly to higher laboratory costs and more outpatient visits taking place than were recommended in national guidelines. These results are the first reported estimates of paediatric DS-TB treatment costs in SA and show the potential cost savings of closer adherence to national treatment guidelines. The findings were robust in sensitivity analyses and are lower than previous cost estimates in adults.

Oncologists' Perceptions of Drug Affordability Using NCCN Evidence Blocks: Results from a National Survey.

The increasing prevalence of cancer coupled with approvals of new drugs and technologies used in therapy have brought increased scrutiny to the cost and value of treatments in oncology. To address the rising concern about oncology drug costs, several organizations have developed value frameworks to help assess the value of oncology regimens. The objective of this study was to assess oncologists' perceptions, awareness, and knowledge of all oncology value frameworks in the United States and to understand oncologists' perceptions of affordability in the context of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Evidence Blocks. To (a) assess oncologists' awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and ratings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (AVF), the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) value framework, NCCN Evidence Blocks, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's DrugAbacus; (b) assess oncologists' knowledge and perceptions of drug affordability as defined by the NCCN Evidence Blocks methodology; and (c) determine the factors that influence drug affordability ratings. Data were collected from an electronic cross-sectional survey of 200 U.S.-based oncologists from a variety of practice settings. Oncologists were asked about their knowledge and perceptions of 4 value frameworks-NCCN Evidence Blocks, AVF, the ICER value framework, and DrugAbacus. Using NCCN Evidence Blocks, oncologists were asked to rate a variety of hypothetical cancer therapies and assign costs (in U.S. dollars) to the 5 levels of affordability. Additional questions that assessed perceived patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and comfort level in assessing affordability were also included in the survey. Oncologists were most familiar with NCCN Evidence Blocks (90%), followed by the AVF (84%), ICER value framework (57%), and DrugAbacus (56%). Oncologists rated affordability higher (mean rating 3: moderately expensive) versus the actual NCCN panel affordability rating (mean rating 1: very expensive). The affordability rating was similar across a variety of hypothetical cancer therapies and tumor types (rating: 3). Oncologists estimated the costs for this rating of 3 to range from $4,600 to $6,000 per month, which was inconsistent with actual drug costs. Oncologists estimated the mean monthly OOP costs for patients with insurance to range from $1,260 for a new oral medication to $1,700 for a new infused medication. Only 26% of oncologists were comfortable or very comfortable with rating costs associated with affordability levels. Surveyed oncologists rated cancer therapies as more affordable (per NCCN Evidence Blocks criteria) than NCCN panel ratings. Costs associated with affordability were not consistent with actual treatment costs; however, most oncologists were not comfortable with rating affordability. Patient OOP costs had the biggest influence on affordability ratings; however, physicians overestimated patient OOP costs significantly. There is an opportunity to improve the value frameworks, especially with regard to affordability assessment. This study was funded by Genentech. Shah-Manek is employed by Ipsos Healthcare, a health care consulting company that received funding from Genentech to conduct this study. DiBonaventura was employed by Ipsos Healthcare at the time of this study. Wong and Ravelo are employed by Genentech. Shah-Manek has consulted with Genentech, Merck, Alkermes, Avanis, Alnylam, Novo Nordisk, Teva, Lilly, and BMS. This work was presented as an oral presentation at the ASCO 2017 Annual Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, on June 2-6, 2017.

Costs and renumeration of osteomyelitis treatment involving free flaps: implications of return to theatre.

Aim: This study aimed to define the costs of surgical management of chronic osteomyelitis where free tissue transfer was required in addition to debridement of bone, particularly the increased costs incurred by a return to theatre. We hypothesised that there would be a significantly greater cost when patients required re-exploration for vascular compromise.Method: We retrospectively analysed the costs of a consecutive series of sixty patient episodes treated at the Bone Infection Unit in Oxford from 2012 to 2015. Treatment involved excision of osteomyelitis with free tissue transfer for immediate soft tissue cover. We compared the costs of uncomplicated cases with those who returned to theatre and determined the profit / loss for the hospital from renumeration through the UK National Health Service Tariff Structure.Results: Hospital income according to UK HRG tariff was compared to the actual cost of treatment and these 60 cases were significantly underfunded overall (P < 0.005). In just 1 case, the cost to the hospital was completely covered by tariff.Six patients (10%) returned to theatre for urgent flap re-exploration with five flaps salvaged and one failed, requiring another free flap reconstruction (1.7%). These six patient episodes had a significantly higher mean cost compared to the uncomplicated cases. The average financial loss to the hospital for patients who did return to theatre was £19401 (range £8103 to £48380) and in those who did not was £9600 (range - £600 to £23717). The case requiring further free tissue transfer cost a total of £74158, £48380 more than the hospital was paid: the most extreme discrepancy. The overall loss for this group of 60 patients was £610 090.Conclusions: Surgery for chronic osteomyelitis is multidisciplinary, complex and therefore expensive with a significant risk of complications. However, this study demonstrates that the hospital currently makes a financial loss on almost all patients but especially if flap complications occur. This study has implications for the long term viability of specialist units treating this important disease.

Estimating The Drug Treatment Cost of Breast Cancer

Objectives Overall treatment costs in oncology are increasing rapidly due to the increasing availability of expensive drugs. Comparing the costs of currently used drugs and assessing the cost-effectiveness of new drugs requires a transparent overview of actual breast cancer treatment prices. As such an overview is lacking, this study aims to synthesize evidence on the reimbursement and costs to estimate the total treatment cost of expensive breast cancer drugs for the Netherlands. Methods Evidence on the approval, reimbursement and list prices of expensive breast cancer drugs was identified from the Dutch Administrative Health Authority (ZINL). Data on the average length of treatment and dosing schedules was obtained from European Parliament Assessment Reports (EPARs) or ZINL reports. All evidence was aggregated in the estimation of actual treatment cost. Results In the Netherlands, 31 breast cancer drugs are approved (available in 41 different forms). Based on drug list prices Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab Emtansine and Trastuzumab are the most expensive drugs. For 17/41 (41.5%), no evidence on the average treatment length was available in EPARs or ZINL reports. Comparing list prices to the estimated treatment cost per patient resulted in substantial differences in the ranking of expensiveness of the drugs. Overall, estimated treatment costs were highest for Bevacizumab, Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Emtansine. Conclusions Estimating treatment costs is far from trivial, given the wide range of evidence sources that need to be synthesized. This complicates rapid and transparent assessment of actual cancer drug treatment cost, which is necessary to focus strategies aiming to limit the increasing healthcare costs. Differences exist in list prices within countries and between countries, thereby influencing the corresponding estimated treatment costs and resulting in list prices having limited value in this context. Therefore, extending standardization in presenting information on costs per cancer drug and implementing real world price estimates in such calculations is highly recommended.

Difficulties in funding of VA-ECMO therapy for patients with severe accidental hypothermia

Severe accidental hypothermia is defined as a core temperature below 28 Celsius degrees. Within the last years, the issue of accidental hypothermia and accompanying cardiac arrest has been broadly discussed and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines underline the importance of Extracorporeal Rewarming (ECR) in treatment of severely hypothermic victims. The study aimed to evaluate the actual costs of ECR with VA-ECMO and of further management in the Intensive Care Unit of patients admitted to the Severe Accidental Hypothermia Centre in Cracow, Poland. We carried out the economic analysis of 31 hypothermic adults in stage III-IV (Swiss Staging) treated with VA ECMO. Twenty-nine individuals were further managed in the Intensive Care Unit. The actual treatment costs were evaluated based on current medication, equipment, and dressing pricing. The costs incurred by the John Paul II Hospital were then collated with the National Health Service (NHS) funding, assessed based on current financial contract. In most of the cases, the actual treatment cost was greater than the funding received by around 10000 PLN per patient. The positive financial balance was achieved in only 4 (14%) individuals; other 25 cases (86%) showed a financial loss. Performed analysis clearly shows that hospitals undertaking ECR may experience financial loss due to implementation of effective treatment recommended by international guidelines. Thanks to new NHS funding policy since January 2017 such loss can be avoided, what shall encourage hospitals to perform this expensive, yet effective method of treatment.

Oncologists’ perceptions of affordability in the NCCN evidence block value frameworks.

6511 Background: The increasing prevalence of cancer coupled with approvals of new drugs and technologies used in therapy have brought increased scrutiny to the cost and value of treatments in oncology. To address the rising concern about oncology drug costs, NCCN has developed the Evidence Blocks (EB) framework to help assess the value of oncology regimens. The objective of this study was to assess and understand oncologist’s perceptions of affordability in the context of the NCCN EB framework. Methods: Data were collected from an electronic cross-sectional survey of 200 US-based oncologists recruited from an online panel. Using the NCCN EB framework, oncologists were asked to rate a variety of hypothetical cancer therapies and assign costs (in US dollars) to the five levels of affordability. Additional questions assessing perceived patient out-of-pocket costs and comfort level in assessing affordability were also included in the survey. Results: Oncologists’ ratings for an existing cancer immunotherapy were generally similar across the EBs (ratings of 4), however oncologists rated affordability higher (3: Moderately Expensive) vs. the actual NCCN panel affordability rating (1: Very Expensive). The affordability rating was similar across a variety of hypothetical cancer therapies and tumor types (rating of 3). Oncologists estimated the costs for this rating of 3 to range from $4600-$6000 per month, which was inconsistent with actual drug costs. Oncologists estimated the mean monthly out-of-pocket costs for patients with insurance to range from $1260 for a new oral medication to $1700 for a new infused medication. Only 26% of oncologists were comfortable or very comfortable with rating costs associated with affordability levels. Conclusions: Surveyed oncologists rated cancer therapies as more affordable than NCCN panel ratings. Costs associated with affordability were not consistent with actual treatment costs; however, most oncologists were not comfortable with rating affordability.

Enzymatic burn wound debridement with NexoBrid®: Cost simulations and investigations on cost efficiency

Abstract Aim Removal of eschar (debridement) is an essential and early step in the treatment of deep burns. Enzymatic debridement by NexoBrid® is a relatively new non-surgical tool for early, individualized and selective debridement which adds some advantages compared to surgical standard techniques known as standard of care (SOC). Nevertheless, until now it is not represented and calculated in the pricing system for German hospitals (G-DRG system), and an own operative procedure key (OPS) is lacking. The objective of this empiric cost study was to compare treatment cost of enzymatic debridement by NexoBrid® and SOC based procedures and to analyse the impact of improved burn wound care using NexoBrid® on total treatment costs of burn patients. Method The analysis is based on two different cost simulation models, the Average Outcome Model and the Defined Patient Model. Based on the results of a randomized phase III trial and treatment costs specified in the pricing system for German hospitals (G-DRG system), total costs of NexoBrid® based treatments were compared to those of SOC to determine cost saving potentials (Average outcome model). In addition, distinct burn wound treatment pathways common in clinical practice were assigned to actual treatment costs to allow economic considerations (Defined Patient Model). Results Using NexoBrid® cost savings are inversely related to the treated total burned surface area (1–15% TBSA) and directly related to the savings in burn centre stay (up to 6.5 days) (Average Outcome Model). Based on quantitative and qualitative aspects, three quarter of all cases in the range of 5% to 15% TBSA burned are in favour of NexoBrid®. Main cost drivers are LOS and ICU stay (45–80% of total costs). NexoBrid® becomes a more powerful cost driver with increasing TBSA treated. If NexoBrid® completely substitutes for SOC, the total cost per patient can be reduced by nearly 30% (treatment of 5% TBSA) or are in the range of SOC costs (treatment of 15% TBSA) (Defined Patient Model). Highest costs are generated when enzymatic and surgical methods for debridement are combined and an increased LOS or ICU stay is indicated. Conclusion Cost advantages of enzymatic debridement by NexoBrid® may emerge in cases with low or medium burned and treated surface area when costs for enzymatic debridement remain below the costs for SOC (excision plus autografting). Even in more severe cases (15% TBSA burned) total costs of basic NexoBrid®-based treatment pathways do not exceed costs of comparable SOC pathways. In addition, enzymatic debridement by NexoBrid® can be successfully applied as a strategic tool in order to reduce surgical procedure time and OR room capacity and making use of the redundant capacity for further surgical cases reimbursement. Beside these quantitative aspects that may improve overall economic efficiency, qualitative improvements of burn wound care must be considered separately from this analysis.