Activity Of Delafloxacin Research Articles

In vitro activity of delafloxacin against clinical levofloxacin-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates.

Increasing antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori necessitates research on new active molecules. In 2017, delafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with chemical properties of activity under acidic conditions, was approved for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and soft-tissue infections. Mutations in gyrA are responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance, but certain clinical isolates of H. pylori appear to display a dual phenotype: resistance to levofloxacin associated with very low delafloxacin MICs. To estimate epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values and to identify mutations in the gyrA gene, specific to FQ resistance, without increasing the MICs of delafloxacin. Clinical strains (n = 231) were collected in the bacteriology laboratory of Poitiers University Hospital over a 2 year period to determine the ECOFF of delafloxacin. Retrospectively, 101 clinical strains with an levofloxacin-resistant phenotype (MIC > 1 mg/L) were selected from 2018 to 2022 for delafloxacin MIC determination and QRDR (gyrA) sequencing. The estimated ECOFF of delafloxacin was ≤0.125 mg/L. No H. pylori isolate showed a levofloxacin-sensitive phenotype with a delafloxacin MIC of >0.125 mg/L. Among the levofloxacin-resistant H. pylori isolates, 53.5% had delafloxacin MICs of ≤0.125 mg/L. The N87I mutation was associated with dual levofloxacin/delafloxacin resistance (P < 0.001) in contrast to the N87K and D91N mutations (P > 0.05). Mutations D91G and D91Y were not associated with a delafloxacin resistance phenotype (P > 0.05). Delafloxacin seems to be a therapeutic alternative for levofloxacin-resistant strains with greater in vitro activity. However, further clinical/biological investigations are required to determine its efficacy in H. pylori eradication.

Comparison of the in vitro activities of delafloxacin and comparators against Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical strains involved in osteoarticular infections: a CRIOGO multicentre retrospective study.

Staphylococcus epidermidis bone and joint infections (BJIs) on material are often difficult to treat. The activity of delafloxacin has not yet been studied on S. epidermidis in this context. The aim of this study was to assess its in vitro activity compared with other fluoroquinolones, against a large collection of S. epidermidis clinical strains. We selected 538 S. epidermidis strains isolated between January 2015 and February 2023 from six French teaching hospitals. One hundred and fifty-two strains were ofloxacin susceptible and 386 were ofloxacin resistant. Identifications were performed by MS and MICs were determined using gradient concentration strips for ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and delafloxacin. Ofloxacin-susceptible strains were susceptible to all fluoroquinolones. Resistant strains had higher MICs of all fluoroquinolones. Strains resistant to ofloxacin (89.1%) still showed susceptibility to delafloxacin when using the Staphylococcus aureus 2021 CA-SFM/EUCAST threshold of 0.25 mg/L. In contrast, only 3.9% of the ofloxacin-resistant strains remained susceptible to delafloxacin with the 0.016 mg/L S. aureus breakpoint according to CA-SFM/EUCAST guidelines in 2022. The MIC50 was 0.094 mg/L and the MIC90 was 0.38 mg/L. We showed low delafloxacin MICs for ofloxacin-susceptible S. epidermidis strains and a double population for ofloxacin-resistant strains. Despite the absence of breakpoints for S. epidermidis, delafloxacin may be an option for the treatment of complex BJI, including strains with MICs of ≤0.094 mg/L, leading to 64% susceptibility. This study underlines the importance for determining specific S. epidermidis delafloxacin breakpoints for the management of BJI on material.

Efficacy of delafloxacin alone and in combination with cefotaxime against cefotaxime non-susceptible invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

We assessed the in vitro activity of delafloxacin and the synergy between cefotaxime and delafloxacin among cefotaxime non-susceptible invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (CNSSP). A total of 30 CNSSP (cefotaxime MIC > 0.5 mg/L) were studied. Serotyping was performed by the Pneumotest-Latex and Quellung reaction. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of delafloxacin, levofloxacin, penicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin and vancomycin were determined by gradient diffusion strips (GDS). Synergistic activity of delafloxacin plus cefotaxime against clinical S. pneumoniae isolates was evaluated by the GDS cross method. Delafloxacin showed a higher pneumococcal activity than its comparator levofloxacin (MIC50, 0.004 versus 0.75 mg/L and MIC90, 0.047 versus >32 mg/L). Resistance to delafloxacin was identified in 7/30 (23.3%) isolates, belonging to serotypes 14 and 9V. Synergy between delafloxacin and cefotaxime was detected in 2 strains (serotypes 19A and 9V). Antagonism was not observed. Addition of delafloxacin increased the activity of cefotaxime in all isolates. Delafloxacin susceptibility was restored in 5/7 (71.4%) strains. CNSSP showed a susceptibility to delafloxacin of 76.7%. Synergistic interactions between delafloxacin and cefotaxime were observed in vitro among CNSSP by GDS cross method.

In vitro activity of delafloxacin against anaerobic bacteria compared with other antimicrobials

The aim of this study was to describe the in vitro activity of delafloxacin against 230 anaerobic isolates and compare it with the activity of other antimicrobials used against infections caused by anaerobic microorganisms. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were lower for delafloxacin than for all other antibiotics tested with the exception of piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem against Gram-positive anaerobic cocci. Only two (0.8 %) isolates of Bacteroides spp. showed a MIC ≥4 μg/mL. With some exceptions, the present results show lower MICs for delafloxacin in comparison to the other antibiotics used against anaerobes.

High-level delafloxacin resistance through the combination of two different mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus

Delafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone indicated for the treatment of complicated bacterial skin infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Despite its recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, the emergence of S. aureus-resistant strains has been reported. As such, this study aimed to investigate the activity of delafloxacin against a collection of S. aureus, and to determine the mechanisms of resistance. The activity of delafloxacin was measured in 59 S. aureus clinical isolates [40 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 19 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)]. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in the isolates resistant to delafloxacin. The minimum inhibitory concentrations required to inactivate 50% and 90% of the isolates (MIC50 and MIC90, respectively) were higher in MRSA (0.19 mg/L and 0.75 mg/L, respectively) than in MSSA (0.008 mg/L and 0.25 mg/L, respectively). Furthermore, 10 S. aureus clinical isolates (16.9%) were categorized as resistant to delafloxacin. Regarding the WGS data, several mutations were found in the quinolone resistance-determining region. Nevertheless, a mutation in the same position (E84K and E84V) of topoisomerase IV (ParC) was found exclusively in the four high-level delafloxacin-resistant isolates. Interestingly, a plasmid-encoded qacC gene (efflux pump) was found to be harboured by the isolate with the highest delafloxacin MIC value (32 mg/L). The use of a wide-spectrum efflux pump inhibitor revealed an important contribution of this system to the acquisition of delafloxacin resistance. In conclusion, delafloxacin has activity against S. aureus, including MRSA. However, this study showed that mutations in position 84 of ParC and the acquisition of a QacC efflux pump are key factors for the development of delafloxacin resistance in S. aureus.

The in vitro activity of delafloxacin and comparator agents against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with cancer.

Fluoroquinolones are used for infection prevention in high-risk patients with haematological malignancies. Fluoroquinolones are active against many Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) but are less active against Gram-positive organisms. We evaluated the in vitro activity of delafloxacin and selected comparators against 560 bacterial pathogens isolated exclusively from patients with cancer. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and time-kill studies were performed using CLSI-approved methodology and interpretive criteria for 350 Gram-positive organisms and 210 GNB that had been recently isolated from patients with cancer. Delafloxacin was more active than ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS. Overall, 63% of staphylococcal isolates were susceptible to delafloxacin, 37% to ciprofloxacin and 39% to levofloxacin. Activity of delafloxacin against most Enterobacterales was similar to that of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. Escherichia coli and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates had low susceptibility rates to the three tested fluoroquinolones. In time-kill studies delafloxacin and levofloxacin decreased the bacterial load to 3.0 log10 in 8 and 13 h, respectively, using 8 × MIC. Delafloxacin is more active than ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin against S. aureus but has substantial gaps in coverage against GNB. Resistance to all three fluoroquinolones could be high among leading GNB such as E. coli and P. aeruginosa, particularly in cancer centres where these agents are widely used as prophylactic agents.

Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values.

ABSTRACTFluoroquinolones have become a popular treatment option for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Although levofloxacin is most commonly used, delafloxacin demonstrates comparable in vitro activity when evaluated under standard susceptibility testing conditions at neutral pH. At acidic pH, the activity of the anionic delafloxacin is improved, while the activity of the zwitterionic levofloxacin is reduced. Because the human respiratory tract has a pH of ~6.6 and is the most common site of S. maltophilia infection, it is vital to understand the activity of these agents in this environment. Therefore, levofloxacin and delafloxacin were tested against clinical S. maltophilia isolates via broth microdilution testing (n = 37) and time-kill analysis (n = 5) in neutral cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (pH 7.3) and acidic CAMHB (aCAMHB) (pH 6.5). In CAMHB, MIC50 values were similar between levofloxacin and delafloxacin (8 mg/L versus 8 mg/L). In aCAMHB, levofloxacin MICs did not change, while delafloxacin MICs decreased by a median of 4 log2 dilutions (MIC50 values of 8 mg/L versus 0.25 mg/L). In time-kill analyses, levofloxacin and delafloxacin at the maximum drug concentration for the free drug (fCmax) were bactericidal against 3 and 2 isolates in CAMHB, respectively. In aCAMHB, levofloxacin was not bactericidal against any isolate, while delafloxacin was bactericidal against the same 2 isolates. Relative to CAMHB, levofloxacin activity was reduced by 2.5 log10 CFU/mL in aCAMHB, whereas delafloxacin activity was increased 2.7 log10 CFU/mL. Although the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia was attenuated in an acidic environment in this study, the increased potency of delafloxacin at pH 6.5 did not translate into improved bactericidal activity in time-kill analyses, compared to pH 7.3.IMPORTANCE Stenotrophomonas maltophilia most often infects the lungs, where the physiologic environment is naturally slightly acidic (pH ~6.6), compared to most parts of the body (such as the bloodstream), which have neutral pH values (~7.4). Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is often treated with the antibiotic levofloxacin, despite the activity of levofloxacin being known to be impaired at acidic pH. Unfortunately, currently available methods for susceptibility testing of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia are performed at a neutral pH and therefore may not accurately represent the activity of levofloxacin at the site of infection in the lungs. A similar but newer antibiotic in the same class as levofloxacin, namely, delafloxacin, is not affected by being in an acidic environment and may actually work better at lower pH values. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether one drug might be better than the other in this setting by testing each agent’s ability to kill S. maltophilia at pH 7.3 and pH 6.5. These findings could then be used to design confirmatory studies that may ultimately impact which drug is given to patients with lung infections due to S. maltophilia.

In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin and Finafloxacin against Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma Species.

ABSTRACTThe in vitro activity of two new fluoroquinolones, delafloxacin and finafloxacin, were evaluated against M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. The MICs of delafloxacin, finafloxacin, and two classical fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin and levofloxacin) were tested against 29 M. hominis and 67 Ureaplasma spp. isolates using the broth microdilution method. The molecular mechanisms underlying fluoroquinolone resistance were also investigated. Delafloxacin exhibited low MICs against M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp., including the levofloxacin-resistant isolates. For M. hominis, delafloxacin showed low MIC90 value of 1 μg/mL (MIC range, <0.031 -1 μg/mL) compared to 8 μg/mL for finafloxacin, 16 μg/mL for moxifloxacin, and 32 μg/mL for levofloxacin. For U. parvum and U. urealyticum, delafloxacin had low MIC90 values (U. parvum, 2 μg/mL; U. urealyticum, 4 μg/mL) compared to 16 -32 μg/mL for finafloxacin, 16 μg/mL for moxifloxacin, and 32 - >32 μg/mL for levofloxacin. The two mutations GyrA S153L and ParC S91I were commonly identified in fluoroquinolone-resistant M. hominis, and ParC S83L was the most frequent mutation identified in fluoroquinolone-resistant Ureaplasma spp. Delafloxacin displayed lower MICs against fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of both M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. that have mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) than the two classical fluoroquinolones. Delafloxacin is a promising fluoroquinolone with low MICs against fluoroquinolone-resistant M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. Our study confirms the potential clinical use of delafloxacin in treating antimicrobial-resistant M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. infections.IMPORTANCE Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma spp. is on the rise globally, which has compromised the efficacy of the currently available antimicrobial agents. This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of two new fluoroquinolones, delafloxacin and finafloxacin, for the first time, against M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. clinical isolates. Delafloxacin and finafloxacin displayed different antimicrobial susceptibility profiles against M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. in vitro. Delafloxacin was found to be more effective against M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. than three classical fluoroquinolones (finafloxacin, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin). Finafloxacin displayed activity similar to moxifloxacin but superior to levofloxacin against M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp. Our findings demonstrate that delafloxacin is a promising fluoroquinolone with outstanding activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant M. hominis and Ureaplasma spp.

In vitro activity of delafloxacin against highly levofloxacin-resistant invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

IntroductionWe report the activity of delafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with high affinity for both topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase, against highly-levofloxacin-resistant invasive strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. MethodsA total of 173 highly-levofloxacin-resistant (MIC>32mg/L) S. pneumoniae invasive isolates were studied. The strains were isolated from blood (n=162) and other sterile fluids (n=11). Serotyping was performed by the Pneumotest-Latex and Quellung reaction.Delafloxacin, levofloxacin, penicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin and vancomycin MICs were determined by the gradient diffusion method following EUCAST guidelines and breakpoints. ResultsAmong the isolates, 32.9% were penicillin non-susceptible, 19.7% cefotaxime non-susceptible, and 76.9% erythromycin resistant. All were susceptible to vancomycin. Delafloxacin MIC50 and MIC90 (mg/L) values were 0.064 and 0.12, respectively; 60% (15/25) of serotype 9V isolates showed delafloxacin MICs≥0.12mg/L. ConclusionsDelafloxacin was very active against highly-levofloxacin-resistant invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae. Isolates belonging to serotype 9V showed higher delafloxacin MIC values.

In vitro Activity of Delafloxacin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Various Clinical Specimens

In vitro Activity of Delafloxacin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Various Clinical Specimens

1077. In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin Agent Against Bacterial Isolates Recovered from Patients with Cancer

Abstract Background Fluoroquinolones have been used for infection prevention in patients with cancer (PWC). They are active against many Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) but are less active against Gram-positive organisms (GPO). Quinolone resistance is increasing and many institutions are using combination regimens for antimicrobial prophylaxis. We evaluated the in vitro activity of delafloxacin (DLX), a novel fluoroquinolone, and selected comparators against 560 bacterial isolates from PWC. Methods Isolates were from recent blood cultures. Susceptibility testing and time kill studies (TKS) were performed using CLSI approved methodology. Appropriate ATCC control strains were used. We calculated MIC50, MIC90, MIC ranges and percent susceptibility using FDA breakpoints when available. TKS were performed on 4 streptococcus mitis isolates at concentrations of MIC, 4x MIC, and 8x MIC. Results DLX was more active than ciprofloxacin (CIP) and levofloxacin (LEV) against methicillin-susceptible (MSSA), and resistant (MRSA) S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and viridans group streptococci (VGS), and had similar activity against beta-hemolytic streptococci. It also had low MICs for Bacillus species (SPP.), Listeria monocytogenes, Micrococcus spp., and Rothia spp. Overall GPO susceptibility was 73% to DLX, 42% to CIP, and 52% to LEV. The activity of DLX against Enterobacterales was similar to CIP and LEV. All 3 agents had moderate activity against Citrobacter spp., and non-MDR P. aeruginosa. Notably, all 3 quinolones had poor activity against E. coli, P. mirabilis, and MDR P. aeruginosa, all common pathogens in PWC. All 3 had low MICs for Acinetobacter spp. DLX and LEV achieved peak bactericidal activity at 6-8 h against all 4 VGS isolates (maximum activity at 8x MIC) but this was not always sustained at 24 h. Table 1. Percent Susceptibility of selected Gram-positive isolates to Delafloxacin, Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin Table 2. Percent Susceptibility of selected Gram-negative isolates to Delafloxacin, Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin Figure 1. Bactericidal Activity of DLX at 1x , 4x, and 8x MIC against VGS - Time Kill Study Conclusion DLX is more active than CIP and LEV against many GPO from PWC (including S. aureus and VGS), but like these agents there are significant gaps in its coverage against GNB. It is probably not suitable as a single agent for antimicrobial prophylaxis in high-risk PWC. The current practice of combining a quinolone with a beta-lactam probably still represents the best option in PWC who need prophylaxis. Disclosures Kenneth Rolston, MD, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)

The AcrAB-TolC Efflux Pump Impacts Persistence and Resistance Development in Stationary-Phase Escherichia coli following Delafloxacin Treatment.

Bacteria have a repertoire of strategies to overcome antibiotics in clinical use, complicating our ability to treat and cure infectious diseases. In addition to evolving resistance, bacteria within genetically clonal cultures can undergo transient phenotypic changes and tolerate high doses of antibiotics. These cells, termed persisters, exhibit heterogeneous phenotypes; the strategies that a bacterial population deploys to overcome one class of antibiotics can be distinct from those needed to survive treatment with drugs with another mode of action. It was previously reported that fluoroquinolones, which target DNA topoisomerases, retain the capacity to kill nongrowing bacteria that tolerate other classes of antibiotics. Here, we show that in Escherichia coli stationary-phase cultures and colony biofilms, persisters that survive treatment with the anionic fluoroquinolone delafloxacin depend on the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump. In contrast, we did not detect this dependence on AcrAB-TolC in E. coli persisters that survive treatment with three other fluoroquinolone compounds. We found that the loss of AcrAB-TolC activity via genetic mutations or chemical inhibition not only reduces delafloxacin persistence in nongrowing E. coli MG1655 or EDL933 (an E. coli O157:H7 strain), but it limits resistance development in progenies derived from delafloxacin persisters that were given the opportunity to recover in nutritive medium following antibiotic treatment. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity in defense mechanisms that persisters use to overcome different compounds within the same class of antibiotics. They further indicate that efflux pump inhibitors can potentiate the activity of delafloxacin against stationary-phase E. coli and block resistance development in delafloxacin persister progenies.

1463. Activity of Delafloxacin against Multi-Drug-Resistant Fastidious Respiratory Pathogens from European Medical Centers (2014-2019)

BackgroundDelafloxacin (DLX) is an anionic fluoroquinolone (FQ) that has been approved in the United States and in Europe for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and was recently approved in the US for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). In the present study, in vitro susceptibility (S) results for DLX and comparator agents were determined for CABP pathogens including Streptococcus pneumoniae (SPN), Haemophilus influenzae (HI), H. parainfluenzae (HP) and Moraxella catarrhalis (MC) clinical isolates from European hospitals participating in the SENTRY Program during 2014-2019.MethodsA total of 2,835 SPN, 1,484 HI, 959 MC, and 20 HP isolates were collected from community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTI) during 2014-2019 from European hospitals. Sites included only 1 isolate/patient/infection episode. Isolate identifications were confirmed at JMI Laboratories. Susceptibility testing was performed according to CLSI broth microdilution methodology, and EUCAST (2020) breakpoints were applied where applicable. Other antimicrobials tested included levofloxacin (LEV) and moxifloxacin (MOX; not tested in 2015). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) SPN isolates were categorized as being nonsusceptible (NS) to amoxicillin-clavulanate, erythromycin (ERY), and tetracycline; other SPN phenotypes were ERY-NS, or penicillin (PEN)-NS. β-lactamase (BL) presence was determined for HI, HP, and MC.ResultsThe activities of the 3 FQs are shown in the table. The most active agent against SPN was DLX, with the lowest MIC50/90 values of 0.015/0.03 mg/L. DLX activities were the same when tested against the MDR or PEN-NS for SPN phenotypes. ERY-NS isolates had DLX MIC50/90 results of 0.015/0.03 mg/L. DLX was the most active FQ against HI, HP, and MC. BL presence did not affect FQ MIC values for HI or MC; only 1 HP isolate was BL-positive.ConclusionDLX demonstrated potent in vitro antibacterial activity against SPN, HI, HP, and MC. DLX was active against MDR SPN that were NS to the agents commonly used as treatments for CABP. These data support the utility of DLX in CABP including when caused by antibiotic resistant strains.Table 1 DisclosuresJennifer M. Streit, BS, A. Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.R.L. (Research Grant or Support)A. Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.R.L. (Research Grant or Support)Allergan (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Paratek Pharma, LLC (Research Grant or Support) Robert K. Flamm, PhD, A. Menarini Industrie Farmaceutiche Riunite S.R.L. (Research Grant or Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Research Grant or Support)Basilea Pharmaceutica International, Ltd (Research Grant or Support)Department of Health and Human Services (Research Grant or Support)Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (Research Grant or Support)

In vitro activity of delafloxacin against highly levofloxacin-resistant invasive isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

IntroductionWe report the activity of delafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone with high affinity for both topoisomerase IV and DNA gyrase, against highly-levofloxacin-resistant invasive strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. MethodsA total of 173 highly-levofloxacin-resistant (MIC>32mg/L) S. pneumoniae invasive isolates were studied. The strains were isolated from blood (n=162) and other sterile fluids (n=11). Serotyping was performed by the Pneumotest-Latex and Quellung reaction.Delafloxacin, levofloxacin, penicillin, cefotaxime, erythromycin and vancomycin MICs were determined by the gradient diffusion method following EUCAST guidelines and breakpoints. ResultsAmong the isolates, 32.9% were penicillin non-susceptible, 19.7% cefotaxime non-susceptible, and 76.9% erythromycin resistant. All were susceptible to vancomycin. Delafloxacin MIC50 and MIC90 (mg/L) values were 0.064 and 0.12, respectively; 60% (15/25) of serotype 9V isolates showed delafloxacin MICs≥0.12mg/L. ConclusionsDelafloxacin was very active against highly-levofloxacin-resistant invasive isolates of S. pneumoniae. Isolates belonging to serotype 9V showed higher delafloxacin MIC values.

Update on the activity of delafloxacin against acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection isolates from European hospitals (2014–2019)

ObjectivesDelafloxacin is a broad-spectrum anionic fluoroquinolone with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Both oral and intravenous formulations were approved for use in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) due to Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms by the US Food and Drug Administration (2017) and European Medicines Agency (2019), and for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia by the FDA (2019). The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program has monitored the susceptibility of delafloxacin in the USA and Europe since 2014. The purpose of this study is to provide an update on delafloxacin activity against ABSSSI isolates primarily collected from hospitalised patients in Europe. MethodsA total of 11,866 non-duplicate ABSSSI isolates were collected from 2014 to 2019 from 46 European medical centres in 24 countries. Susceptibilities were determined by broth microdilution. Results were interpreted using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints (2020). ResultsThe most common isolate wasS. aureus (37.8%; n = 4484), followed by Escherichia coli (11.0%) and Streptococcus spp. (10.0%). Delafloxacin susceptibility for S. aureus was 92.4% (MIC50/90, ≤0.004/0.25 mg/L), streptococci 98.4% and E. coli 58.1%. Delafloxacin was more active against S. aureus than levofloxacin (84.0% intermediate; MIC50/90, 0.25/>4 mg/L) and moxifloxacin (84.3% susceptible; MIC50/90, ≤0.06/2 mg/L). Susceptibility of E. coli was similar for the three quinolones. ConclusionsDelafloxacin had broad-spectrum activity and improved potency against Gram-positive pathogens compared with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. These data suggest that delafloxacin may be a useful therapeutic choice for the most common causes of ABSSSI.

Delafloxacin activity against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility or resistance to methicillin, vancomycin, daptomycin or linezolid.

Delafloxacin is a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. The drug has been approved for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections including those caused by MRSA. There are limited data available against MRSA blood isolates (MRSABIs), vancomycin-intermediate strains (VISA), vancomycin-resistant strains (VRSA), daptomycin-non-susceptible strains (DNSSA) and linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LRSA). Antimicrobial activity of delafloxacin, levofloxacin, vancomycin, daptomycin and linezolid was determined against 110 MRSABIs, 15 VRSA, 35 VISA, 40 DNSSA and 6 LRSA. Microdilution testing using CAMHB was used to determine MIC according to CLSI guidelines. FDA breakpoints were used to determine delafloxacin susceptibility, and CLSI breakpoints were used for all other antibiotics. PCR testing for molecular markers was performed. Delafloxacin demonstrated activity against MRSABIs with an MIC90 of 1 mg/L and 68% susceptibility. Against the other groups the MIC90 and susceptibility were 1 mg/L and 40%, respectively, for VISA, 4 mg/L and 7% for VRSA and 1 mg/L and 38% for DNSSA. None of the LRSA isolates was susceptible to delafloxacin. Delafloxacin was active against 94% of MRSA blood isolates that were genotype SCC IVa. For MRSABIs with a levofloxacin MIC ≥8 mg/L (55/110), suggesting multiple mutations in the QRDR, delafloxacin MIC90 was 1 mg/L with a 36.4% susceptibility rate. Delafloxacin demonstrates superior activity to levofloxacin against recent MRSA blood isolates, VISA, VRSA and DNSSA, and demonstrates good activity against blood isolates most commonly found in the community.

Activity of delafloxacin versus that of levofloxacin against anaerobic and microaerophilic isolates

The aim of the study was to comparatively assess delafloxacin and levofloxacin activities against 96 anaerobic and some microaerophilic isolates. Delafloxacin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were strikingly lower than those of levofloxacin. Delafloxacin MIC90 against clostridia, other Gram-positive rods, anaerobic/microaerophilic cocci and Gram-negative rods were 0.75, 0.032, 0.38 and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively. The highest (≥4 μg/mL) MICs of the newer fluoroquinolone were found in only 4.2% of isolates versus 46.9% by levofloxacin. The present results and the potency in acidic conditions showed delafloxacin advantages over levofloxacin in terms of usefulness for treatment of mixed anaerobic-aerobic infections and activity against Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile.

1588. Delafloxacin Activity Against Staphylococcus aureus with Reduced Susceptibility or Resistance to Methicillin, Vancomycin, Daptomycin, or Linezolid

BackgroundDelafloxacin is a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. The drug has been approved for patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections including those caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus. There is limited data available against methicillin-resistant S. aureus blood isolates (MRSABI), vancomycin intermediate strains (VISA), vancomycin-resistant strains (VRSA), daptomycin non-susceptible strains (DNSSA) and linezolid-resistant S. aureus (LRSA).MethodsAntimicrobial activity of delafloxacin, levofloxacin, vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, and linezolid was determined against recent (2016–2018) MRSABI (110), VRSA (15), VISA (35), DNSSA (40), and LRSA (6). Broth microdilution testing using Mueller–Hinton broth was used to determine minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) according to CLSI guidelines. FDA breakpoints were used to determine delafloxacin susceptibility, and CLSI breakpoints were used for all other antibiotics.ResultsAntimicrobial MIC90 expressed in mg/L and (% susceptible) MRSABI VISA VRSA DNSSA Delafloxacin1 (68)1 (40)4 (7)1 (38)Levofloxacin>16 (38)>16 (9)> 16 (0)>16 (15)Vancomycin1 (99)8 (0)>64 (0)8 (35)Daptomycin1 (96)4 (26)1 (100)4 (0)Ceftaroline1 (99)1 (100)1 (100)1 (100)Linezolid2 (100)2 (100)2 (100)2 (100)None of the LRSA were susceptible to delafloxacin or levofloxacin. All strains that were susceptible to the antimicrobial agents above had an MBC that was the same as the MIC or one dilution greater except for linezolid which demonstrated an MBC that was more than eight-fold greater than the MIC. For MRSABI isolates with a levofloxacin MIC ≥ 8 mg/L (55/110) suggesting multiple mutations in the quinolone-resistant determining region, the delafloxacin MIC90 was 1 mg/L with a 36.4% susceptibility rate.ConclusionDelafloxacin demonstrates superior activity to levofloxacin against recent MRSA blood isolates, VISA, VRSA, and DNSSA.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Erratum for Pfaller et al., "In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin against Contemporary Bacterial Pathogens from the United States and Europe, 2014".

Erratum for Pfaller et al., "In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin against Contemporary Bacterial Pathogens from the United States and Europe, 2014".

Activity of Delafloxacin When Tested Against Bacterial Surveillance Isolates Collected in the US and Europe During 2014–2016 as Part of a Global Surveillance Program

BackgroundDelafloxacin (DLX) is an investigational anionic fluoroquinolone with an NDA that is under US FDA review to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and is undergoing Phase 3 studies to treat community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.MethodsA total of 36,683 Gram-positive (GP) and -negative (GN) bacteria isolated during 2014–2016 were selected from medical centers in the US and Europe. Susceptibility testing (S) was performed by frozen-form broth microdilution methods for DLX and comparators.ResultsDLX was very active against Staphylococcus aureus (SA, n = 9,355; MIC50/90, 0.008/0.5 mg/L) while the levofloxacin (LEV) MIC50/90 was 0.25/>4 mg/L (67.9%S). The MIC50/90 for methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) was 0.12/1 mg/L. For MRSA, all isolates were S to vancomycin and daptomycin (DAP), linezolid and tigecycline (TGC) S was ≥99.9%. Decreased rates of S were noted for LEV (29.8%), clindamycin (72.9%), and erythromycin (17.3/17.8%; CLSI/EUCAST). Minocycline (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L), ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/L), DAP (MIC50/90, 0.5/0.5 mg/L), and DLX (MIC50/90, 0.015/0.5 mg/L) were the most active agents tested against coagulase-negative staphylococci. Against Streptococcus pneumoniae (SPN), the MIC50/90 for DLX (0.015/0.03 mg/L) and TGC (0.03/0.06 mg/L) were the lowest among the agents tested. The DLX MIC50/90 values did not vary among the penicillin-S, -intermediate, and -R subgroups of SPN. The MIC50/90 values for DLX against S. pyogenes and S. agalactiae were 0.015/0.03 mg/L. DLX was highly active against Haemophilus influenzae. The DLX MIC50/90 (≤0.001/0.004 mg/L) was the same for β-lactamase positive and negative H. influenzae. Against Enterobacteriaceae, 76.0% of DLX MIC values were ≤1 mg/L. Susceptibility to LEV was 80.8%, and S to ceftriaxone, ceftazidime (CAZ), and cefepime ranged from 78.5–86.3%. A total of 72.6% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates exhibited DLX MIC values ≤1 mg/L, while LEV S was 73.2% and CAZ was 81.6%. The MIC50/90 for both DLX and LEV were 0.5/>4 mg/L, respectively.ConclusionDLX was active against a broad range of GP and GN bacteria, including MRSA and multidrug-resistant SPN. DLX merits further study as therapy in infections in which these organisms may occur.Disclosures R. K. Flamm, Melinta Therapeutics: Research Contractor, Research grant D. Shortridge, Melinta Therapeutics: Research Contractor, Research grant M. D. Huband, Melinta Therapeutics: Research Contractor, Research grant S. McCurdy, Melinta Therapeutics: Employee, Salary M. A. Pfaller, Melinta Therapeutics: Research Contractor, Research grant