The article is devoted to the analysis of national legislation, in particular numerous by-laws on the problematic issues of vaccination, identification of existing conflicts and gaps that prevent its effective legal regulation. It has been established that in recent years, due to the pandemic caused by the spread of the coronavirus infection among the legal scientific community, the issue of investigating criminal liability in the field of forgery of medical documents has become topical. At the same time, an active dialogue between the state and society on vaccination issues has begun in Ukraine. Cause of increase in the number of representatives of the anti-vaccination movement, publicity and dissemination in the mass media of certain health complications allegedly caused by the vaccine against the infection of COVID-19, the leadership of the country: the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Education and Science, the Commissioner of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine with of human rights and other representatives of the state authorities were faced with the spread of mistrust among the population on the issue of vaccinations. The urgent need for mass vaccination is not mostly supported by society, so there is a demand for illegal buying of fake vaccination documents and their further use. The data from the Unified State Register of Pre-Trial Decisions regarding the decisions issued for forgery and the use of forged medical documents, in particular, COVID certificates and PCR tests, are provided. It is noted that the current national criminal legislation contains norms that provide for criminal liability for forgery of documents, seals, stamps and forms, sale or use of forged documents, seals, stamps, including official medical documents. The research provides a legal overview of the provisions of the draft Law on Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine on establishing liability for forgery of documents related to preventive vaccinations, as well as outlined the experience of leading European countries regarding criminal liability for forgery and use of vaccination documents. A conclusion was reached regarding the impracticality of introducing enhanced liability for forgery of documents related to prophylactic vaccinations.
Read full abstract