Stretching is common in recreational and athletic settings in an attempt to reduce the passive stiffness of muscles and reduce injury risk. One proposed mechanism by which stretching can reduce muscle stiffness is by decreasing alpha motor neuron activity and decreasing the output from, or sensitivity to, muscle and joint proprioceptors. However, the resultant reduced motor neuron and proprioceptor activity, as well as reduced stiffness, may have a negative impact on muscle force generation. PURPOSE: To determine if muscle force, power, and optimum length are affected by 4 weeks of static or ballistic stretching. METHODS: Twenty nine, recreationally active, aged 18–60yr., males who had not undergone routine flexibility training in the past 6 months were participants in this study. Prior to completing the stretching program and following habituation, measures of peak torque (PT), rate of torque development (RTD), work (W), and peak torque angle (PTA) were assessed in the hip extensors. All measures were completed on a isokinetic dynamometer at 1.05rad·s−1 (60deg·s−1) and involved hip extension from a flexed position. Then, participants completed 4 weeks of either static or ballistic flexibility training of the hip extensors for a total stretching duration of 3,600s. Following the 4 weeks of training and two days without stretching, assessment of active torque development was repeated. Comparisons between variables prior to and post-training were made using repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: After training, PT increased by 5.3 ± 19.0% in the static group, 7.8 ± 12.7% in the ballistic group, and 6.1 ± 17.9% in the control group (p = .94). RTD increased by 4.8 ± 22.7% in the static group, 3.6 ± 28.0% in the ballistic group and by 9.7 ± 24.0% in the control group (p = .85). W increased by 3.9 ± 7.0% in the static group, 14.7 ± 27.4% in the ballistic group, and 5.5 ± 9.5% in the control group (p = .35). PTA changed little with a −1.6 ± 6.6% decrease in the static group, and increases of 0.86 ±4.1% in the ballistic and 0.18 ± 8.7% in the control groups (p = .80). There were no statistical differences between groups for any measures. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that 4 weeks of stretching have little effect on parameters of active torque development. There were no changes in optimal muscle length (PTA) that would suggest that a lengthening of the muscle occurred with stretching. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in these measures between either static or ballistic stretching modalities. These data indicate that engaging in a moderate duration stretching program does not adversely affect the generation of muscle force or power. Supported by NIH grant P20 RR16462
Read full abstract