Acromioclavicular Joint Tenderness Research Articles

Bone marrow edema in the acromioclavicular joint after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BackgroundBone marrow edema (BME) in the acromioclavicular joint (ACj) may occur after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), resulting in persistent postoperative ACj pain. We investigated the incidence and clinical characteristics of BME in ACj after ARCR. MethodsPatients exhibiting ACj-related symptoms prior to ARCR surgery, no BME in the ACj on MRI, and an ability to undergo 2-year postoperative physical and MRI examinations of the ACj were included. Patients who underwent distal clavicle resection or osteophyte resection below the ACj and those unable to achieve primary repair of the rotator cuff were excluded. MRI evaluation was performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients who showed BME in ACj on fat-suppressed T2 MRI at 24 months postoperatively were classified into the BME + group, and those with no BME were classified into the BME− group. Patient background, operation time, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, re-tear rate, ACj tenderness, and cross-body adduction test were compared between groups. In addition, we examined the time of occurrence of BME. ResultsA total of 345 ARCRs were performed during the study period. After the exclusion of 114 shoulders, the remaining 231 shoulders were included in this study. There were 208 cases in the BME− group and 23 cases in the BME + group. The incidence of BME was 9.96 %. Although the JOA scores of both groups showed a significant improvement postoperatively compared to preoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In terms of re-tear, there was 1 case in the BME + group and 7 in the BME− group. Positive ACj tenderness and cross-body adduction test were significantly higher in the BME + group (P < 0.001). BME occurred in 6 cases at 3 months, 9 cases at 6 months, and 8 cases at 1 year postoperatively. None of the patients developed BME at more than 1 year postoperatively. BME was observed on MRI in all cases at 2 years postoperatively. ConclusionsThe rate of occurrence of BME in the ACj after ARCR was 9.96 %. Patients with BME were significantly more likely to have ACj tenderness and positive cross-body adduction test. BME in the ACj often occurs within 6 months to 1 year after ARCR of small-to-medium rotator cuff tears, suggesting a relationship with postoperative functional improvement of the shoulder joint. The ACj should be considered as a potential site of persistent pain after ARCR for small-to-medium rotator cuff tears.

Does Acromioclavicular Joint Tenderness Affect the Outcome of Rotator Cuff Repair? A Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome of rotator cuff repair (RCR) without distal clavicle excision (DCE) in patients with degenerative rotator cuff tear and acromio-clavicular joint (ACJ) tenderness. Methods: A cohort of 70 patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR without DCE were prospectively evaluated. Parameters such as the presence of ACJ arthritis on imaging and long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology (intra-operative) were recorded. The ACJ tenderness and clinical outcome scores including Oxford shoulder score and quick-disability of arm, and shoulder and hand score were evaluated preoperatively and at 1-year postoperatively. Results: Four patients were lost to follow up. Of remaining 66 patients, ACJ tenderness was found in 50% of the total study population. ACJ tenderness showed significant positive correlation with biceps tendinopathy (R = 0.37, P = 0.002). Postoperatively, there was significant improvement in clinical outcome scores which were comparable in patients with or without ACJ tenderness. Among patients with tender ACJ, the tenderness resolved completely in 78.7% of patients. Conclusions: ACJ tenderness did not adversely affect the outcome following RCR. Furthermore, the patients with ACJ tenderness have higher incidence of LHBT tendinopathy.

Is routine distal clavicle resection necessary in rotator cuff repair surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The objective of the present study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials looking at the effect of distal clavicle resection in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR). A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials looking at RCR +/- distal clavicle resection. Primary clinical outcome measures included in the meta-analysis were American Shoulder Elbow Society (ASES) score, pain on visual analogue scale and range of motion in forward elevation. The systematic review identified three studies with a total of 203 participants. Those who underwent distal clavicle resection in conjunction with RCR had worse pain and acromioclavicular joint tenderness at 3-month follow-up. This difference, however, was not observed at the 24-month follow-up. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) for the ASES score was 0.45 (-3.67 to 4.58) and pain on visual analogue scale was - 0.27 (-0.70 to 0.16). Routine distal clavicle resection in the setting of rotator cuff repair does not result in improved outcomes for patients with no difference being observed at 24 months post surgery. The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis do not support routine distal clavicle resection when performing RCR.

The comparison of arthroscopic acromioplasty with and without acromioclavicular coplaning.

Coplaning means the removal of medial acromial spurs and inferior aspect of the distal clavicle. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic acromioplasty with and without coplaning in patients without acromioclavicular (AC) joint arthritis. Because of impingement syndrome, arthroscopic subacromial decompression and acromioplasty was performed in Group 1 (9 males/31 female). In addition, coplaning was performed in Group 2 (8 males/21 females) by two different surgeons. The mean age was 48 in Group 1, 46 in Group 2. The mean follow-up was 50 months and 44 months, respectively. Constant score, cross-body adduction test and AC joint tenderness was used for follow-up. The mean preoperative Constant scores were 45 points (range: 34-76 points) in Group 1, 39 points (range: 32-69 points) in Group 2. The mean Constant scores at the latest follow-up was 78 points (range: 68-100 points) for Group 1, 84 points (range: 72-100 points) for Group 2. There was no statistically difference between two groups at the latest follow-up (p<0.05). In two patients in Group 2, cross-body adduction test was positive but asymptomatic. Excision of the inferior side of the lateral clavicle to the level of the acromion with minimal disruption of the joint capsule does not develop AC joint symptoms in long-term follow-up.

Is Arthroscopic Distal Clavicle Resection Necessary for Patients With Radiological Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears?

Background: The failure of subacromial decompression may be attributed to persistent symptoms of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) arthritis, while inferior clavicular spurs of the ACJ may be associated with failed healing of repaired rotator cuffs. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic distal clavicle resection (DCR) in patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant asymptomatic radiological ACJ arthritis. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 78 patients with rotator cuff tears in addition to radiological and asymptomatic ACJ arthritis who were scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively randomized into 2 groups. Patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with acromioplasty. Patients in group 1 (39 patients) underwent additional arthroscopic DCR, while patients in group 2 (39 patients) did not. Clinical outcomes of the 2 groups were compared using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score up to at least 24 months. The structural integrity of repaired rotator cuffs was assessed using ultrasonography, computed tomography arthrography, or MRI at least 6 months after surgery. To evaluate ACJ instability, weighted stress radiography of the ACJ was studied at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Patients in both groups showed significant improvement in the VAS score and all functional scores at final follow-up (mean, 29.2 months; range, 24-46 months) without significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05). Results (mean ± SD) for preoperative group 1/group 2 and postoperative group 1/group 2 were as follows, respectively: 7.2 ± 1.8/6.1 ± 1.9 (P = .02) and 0.6 ± 1.8/0.6 ± 0.9 (P = .97) for the VAS score, 74.1 ± 5.7/73.8 ± 8.0 (P = .87) and 96.3 ± 5.7/95.7 ± 4.6 (P = .77) for the Constant score, and 47.0 ± 10.3/50.8 ± 14.1 (P = .22) and 91.5 ± 15.5/94.5 ± 11.8 (P = .55) for the ASES score. Failed cuff healing occurred in 9 patients (23%) in group 1 and 10 patients (26%) in group 2, with no significant difference (P = .95). In group 1, there were 2 patients (5.0%) with ACJ subluxation on weighted stress radiography at 6 months postoperatively. These patients complained of gross protrusion and ACJ tenderness. Conclusion: Preventive arthroscopic DCR in patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant asymptomatic radiological ACJ arthritis did not result in better clinical or structural outcomes, and it did lead to symptomatic ACJ instability in some patients. Preventive arthroscopic DCR is not recommended in patients with radiological but asymptomatic ACJ arthritis. Further long-term follow-up is needed to confirm the development of symptoms in ACJ arthritis.