Magmatic hydrothermal mineral deposits axiomatically frame the hosting pluton and the given tectonic setting in which they are inserted. Unsurprisingly, pre-Cambrian porphyry deposits are different than Phanerozoic examples, as collisional or post-collisional deposits are different than arc-related mineralizing systems. As such, this contribution assesses the tectonic framework and the magmatic evolution of the igneous suites present in south-central Amazonian Craton (Tapajós Mineral Province, TMP), and how these parameters translate into metallogenetic potential for the formation of magmatic-hydrothermal copper and gold deposits. For this purpose we gathered whole-rock geochemistry data from selected TMP copper and gold deposits and present new in situ trace-element and U-Pb analyses in zircon grains.The host rocks of the selected mineralizing systems belong either to the older magmatic sequence (OMS, 2.00–1.95 Ga), or to the younger magmatic sequence (YMS, 1.90–1.86 Ga). Whereas OMS presents characteristics of arc-related rocks, YMS represents the evolution towards post-orogenic or collisional setting. OMS might be divided into groups I, II and III granitoids. Group I comprises granites and granodiorites that mark the onset of the arc-magmatism in the TMP at ca. 2011 Ma. In this stage rocks are peraluminous, ferroan, anhydrous, show a strong crustal component and fO2 values close to or below the fayalite-magnetite-quartz buffer (ΔFMQ), yielding metallogenetic unfertile pluton. These rocks correlate with the Cuiú-Cuiú Complex and comprise samples from the Patrocínio and Tocantinzinho deposits. Group II granitoids correlate with the Creporizão Suite and comprise Tocantinzinho, São Jorge, Chapéu do Sol and Patrocínio deposit samples (with extrusive equivalents in the Coringa deposit). Rocks are metaluminous to peraluminous, magnesian to ferroan and mark the evolution of the magmatism towards more oxidizing (0 ≤ ΔFMQ ≤ + 4), hydrous and metallogenetically fertile conditions at ca. 1986 Ma. Mineralized zones are defined by gold bearing sulfide veins and veinlets within the potassic or sericitic alteration halos. Group III comprises rarer high-K, metaluminous, ferroan, anhydrous and reduced syenites and monzonites dated at 1993 and 1974 Ma, generated by decompression melting of metasomatized mantle. By itself, group III rocks should be considered as unfertile batches of magma, however, its interaction with the coeval, more hydrous and oxidized group II melts, confer these magmas their metallogenetic potential. Mineralization in group III rocks is defined by disseminated pyrrhotite – pyrite ± gold within the sericitic, chloritic and/or carbonate alteration zones.YMS comprises intermediate and acid rocks that belong to the Parauari Intrusive Suite and to the Iriri Group. Whereas, intermediate volcanics from YMS evolved on a hydrous and reduced petrologic trend, acid volcanics and the Batalha and Palito granitoids evolved on a dry and reduced trend, reflecting a change on TMP’s tectonic context, from magmatic-arc to a post-orogenic or collisional tectonic setting. Despite the reduced and anhydrous characteristic of the magmas, YMS’s metallogenetic potential is related with remobilization or melting of SCLM or lower crustal Au-rich sulfides formed on the previous magmatic events. Hence, the first pulses of the YMS might be considered as potentially fertile for the formation of Au-rich magmatic-hydrothermal deposits.
Read full abstract