Repair Of Achilles Tendon Rupture Research Articles

Percutaneous repair of achilles tendon ruptures: short-term results of 41 patients

Aims: Despite the current popularity of surgical treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures, there is no clear consensus about which technique should be applied. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short- to mid-term results of acute Achilles tendon ruptures treated with the percutaneous method and to discuss these results in light of the literature. Methods: In this study, 41 patients who were operated on percutaneously with the diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture between 2016 and 2019, whose treatment was completed, and who had a follow-up period of at least 1 year were included. At the patients’ final follow-up visits, the range of motion of the ankle joint, time to return to work and sports, and complications were evaluated. For functional evaluations, the scoring system of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) for the ankle joint was used. Results: The mean age of the patients was 29.3 (18-50) years and the mean follow-up duration was 23 (12-38) months. The mean dorsiflexion angle was 32.27° (20-45°) and the mean plantar flexion angle was 34.58° (20-45°). The time to return to work was 14.2 (8-21) weeks, while time to return to sports was 30.4 (17-49) weeks. The mean AOFAS score of the patients was 91.63 (74-100). The complications included infection in 2 (4.8%) patients, wound necrosis in 1 (2.4%) patient, re-rupture in 1 (2.4%) patient, and sural nerve neuropraxia in 1 (2.4%) patient. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that percutaneous repair is an effective method in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures, like other surgical methods that offer good functional results with low complication rates.

Mini-open versus percutaneous surgical repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the clinical outcomes and complications of mini-open (MOT) and percutaneous techniques (PT) in the surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing MOT with PT for AATR. We assessed functional outcomes, complication rates, and operation time. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan Web. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled with a fixed-effects model for dichotomous and continuous endpoints, respectively. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I2 statistics. Eight studies, comprising 484 patients, were included, of whom 226 (46%) underwent MOT. MOT was associated with a significantly lower re-rupture rate (1.48% vs. 6.11%; OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.86; p = 0.03; I2 = 6%) and sural nerve injury rate (0.57% vs. 5.64%; OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.81; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed in venous thrombosis (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.17-3.94; p = 0.33; I2 = 0%), wound infection (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.12-2.62; p = 0.46; I2 = 0%), or operation time (MD 1.83min; 95% CI -1.13-4.79; p = 0.23; I2 = 88%). Functional outcomes showed higher American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scores in the MOT group (MD 1.52 points; 95% CI 0.62-2.42; p = 0.001; I2 = 3%), while (Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score) ATRS, time to return to activities, and ankle plantar and dorsiflexion were comparable. MOT for AATR repair seems to reduce re-ruptures and sural nerve injuries while improving AOFAS scores, with no significant differences in other complications compared to PT. These findings suggest that the MOT may offer a safer and equally effective alternative to PT for AATR.

Direct repair of the chronic ochronotic Achilles tendon rupture: a case report

BackgroundAlkaptonuria (AKU) is a rare hereditary disease. Ochronotic arthropathy, tendinopathy, and osteopenia/osteoporosis are generally musculoskeletal manifestations in patients with AKU. Because of the ochronotic tendinopathy and osteopenia, the surgical strategy for chronic ochronotic Achilles tendon rupture may be challenging. No studies have reported the surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture in patients with AKU.Case presentationWe report a case of AKU that required surgical treatment for chronic Achilles tendon rupture. A 60-year-old woman was referred to our department for the assessment of left hindfoot pain that persisted for more than nine months after an ankle sprain. Three years prior to the first presentation to our hospital, she was diagnosed with AKU due to pigmented hip cartilage at the time of total hip arthroplasty. The patient was diagnosed as chronic Achilles tendon rupture based on the results of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI showed enlarged scar tissue of the Achilles tendon with an intrasubstance high signal intensity. We performed resection of the central part of the scar tissue (total length, 24 mm) followed by direct repair using the proximal and distal stumps of the scar tissue. The MRI at 12months after surgery showed continuity of the repaired Achilles tendon. At 18 months after surgery, the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score improved from 22 points preoperatively to 84 points postoperatively. The foot and ankle outcome score also improved.ConclusionsWe reported a case of AKU with chronic Achilles tendon rupture in which direct repair using scar tissue between the tendon stumps was effective. Careful selection of the surgical procedure for the treatment of chronic ochronotic Achilles tendon rupture is recommended because of concomitant ochronotic tendinopathy and osteopenia/osteoporosis.

H-Loop Knotless Double-Row Repair Versus Krackow Repair for Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Biomechanical Study in a Cadaveric Model.

Surgery is widely recognized as an effective treatment for Achilles tendon rupture; however, there remains debate regarding the optimal surgical approach. To compare the biomechanical properties of 2 techniques, the H-loop knotless double-row (HLDR) suture repair and the Krackow suture repair, for Achilles tendon rupture in a cadaveric model. Controlled laboratory study. Ten matched Achilles tendon specimens from 5 male and 5 female donors were obtained. Each specimen from a matched pair was randomly distributed to 1 of 2 repair groups, the HLDR group or the Krackow group. Tendon elongation was recorded after exposure to 10, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 load cycles. The gap distance after application of a 100-N force, the force needed to produce a 2-mm gap, and the load to failure were measured. All biomechanical properties were compared between the HLDR and Krackow groups using the paired t test. The HLDR group consistently exhibited significantly less elongation than the Krackow group after exposure to the 7 load cycles (P < .01 for all). In addition, the HLDR group exhibited a significantly smaller gap distance after applying a 100-N force (0.30 ± 0.02 vs 8.10 ± 0.46 mm for Krackow group), required significantly more force to generate a 2-mm gap (419.68 ± 39.48 vs 22.29 ± 3.40 N for the Krackow group), and had a significantly higher ultimate failure load (519.91 ± 57.29 vs 220.30 ± 19.27 N for the Krackow group) (P < .01 for all). The study findings demonstrated that the HLDR technique had more advantages compared with the Krackow technique with regard to elongation after different cyclic loadings, gap distance after a 100-N load, force needed to produce a 2-mm gap, and load to failure in a cadaveric model. The HLDR technique could be a viable option for Achilles tendon rupture repair.

Surgical or non-operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture : What does the current literature say?

The Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in humans and is frequently injured, especially in the physically active young to middle-aged population. An increasing frequency of Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR) has been reported in several studies. However, there is no international consensus regarding possible non-operative (N-OP) or operative (surgical) treatment (OP). The aim of this article is to semi-quantitatively compare both treatment options for ATR by analyzing the results reported in the literature. For this purpose, relevant categories were identified, and the literature was then evaluated in aPubMed analysis. Tenmeta-analyses and twocost analyses were included. The data was extracted according to the categories and evaluated comparatively. OP and N‑OP for acute ATR can lead to equally good restitution of clinical function if early functional rehabilitation is applied. The lower re-rupture rate is an advantage of OP, whereas the lower general complications speak in favor of N‑OP. The minimally invasive or percutaneous surgical technique (M-OP) appears to be advantageous over the open surgical technique (O-OP), although studies show an increased rate of lesions of the sural nerve. There is no consensus regarding the superiority of OP or N‑OP for acute ATR, as several studies conducted since the introduction of early mobilization protocols have shown similar results for these two interventions. Results and complications of M‑OP and O‑OP are also comparable. Considering the available data on the various surgical procedures, the authors prefer the M‑OP technique with adequate sural nerve protection for repair of acute ATR, combined with an early mobilization protocol.

Derivation and validation of a risk calculator for the prediction of incidence of complications following repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture

BackgroundThe Achilles tendon is the body’s strongest and largest tendon. It is commonly injured, particularly among athletes, accounting for a significant portion of serious tendon injuries. Several factors play a precipitating role in increasing the risk of these injuries.ObjectiveOur objective is to derive and validate a risk calculator for the prediction of incidence of any complication following Achilles tendon repair.MethodsWe used de-identified data from the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2021. It comprises 7010 individuals who had undergone Achilles tendon rupture repair. Demographic and risk factors information was collected. To develop the calculator, the sample was divided into a derivation cohort (40%) and a validation cohort (60%). Multivariate logistic regression was used for statistical analysis, and a risk calculator for incidence of any complication was derived from the derivation cohort and validated on the remaining 60% of the sample. Patients with missing data were excluded, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05.ResultsWe analyzed the derivation cohort of 2245 individuals who underwent Achilles tendon repair surgery between 2005 and 2021, with a 5.5% overall complication. Multivariate logistic regression identified anesthesia type, ASA classification, certain co-morbidities (pre-operative dialysis and medication-requiring hypertension), and wound classification as significant predictors of complications. The developed risk calculator model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.685 in the derivation cohort and 0.655 in the validation cohort, surpassing the widely used and validated modified frailty index. A cut-off score threshold of 0.06 was established using Youden’s index to dichotomize individuals into low and high risk for developing any postoperative complications.ConclusionOur risk calculator includes factors that most significantly affect the incidence of any complication following Achilles tendon repair.

Comparison of different immobilisation durations following open surgery for acute achilles tendon rupture: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundIn recent decades, early rehabilitation after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) repair has been proposed. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare different immobilisation durations in order to determine the optimal duration after open surgery for ATR repair.MethodsThis study included 1088 patients (mean age, 34.9 ± 5.9 years) who underwent open surgery for acute ATR repair. The patients were categorised into four groups (A, B, C, and D) according to postoperative immobilisation durations of 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively. All patients received the same suture technique and a similar rehabilitation protocol after brace removal,; they were clinically examined at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 weeks postoperatively, with a final follow-up at a mean of 19.0 months. The primary outcome was the recovery time for the one-leg heel-rise height (OHRH). Secondary outcomes included the time required to return to light exercise (LE) and the recovery times for the range of motion (ROM). Data regarding the surgical duration, complications, the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score were also collected.ResultsThe recovery times for OHRH, LE, and ROM were significantly shorter in groups A and B than in groups C and D (P < 0.001). The VAS scores decreased over time, reaching 0 in all groups by 10 weeks. The mean scores in groups A and B were higher than those in the other groups at 2 and 4 weeks (P < 0.001), whereas the opposite was true at 8 weeks (P < 0.001). ATRS and the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot scale score increased across all groups over time, showing significant between-group differences from weeks 6 to 16 (P < 0.001) and weeks 6 to 12 (P < 0.001). The mean scores were better in groups A and B than in groups C and D. Thirty-eight complications (3.5%) were observed, including 20 re-ruptures and 18 superficial infections. All complications were resolved at the last follow-up, with no significant between-group differences.ConclusionsImmobilisation for 2 weeks after open surgery for ATR repair may be the optimal strategy for early rehabilitation with relatively minimal pain and other complications.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04663542).

Paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis with best- and worst-case analyses for rerupture rates.

Paratenon preserving techniques to facilitate acute Achilles tendon rupture repair (AATR) functions by maintaining vascularity and biology for optimal healing response. Therefore, the purpose is to evaluate the outcomes following paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance AATR. The hypothesis was that paratenon-preserving techniques demonstrate high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR. A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed by two authors using specific search terms and eligibility criteria. The assessment of the evidence was two-fold: level and quality of evidence. A meta-analysis of proportions for the various complication rates was performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method following the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation. Fixed effects models were employed if I2 < 25% (low heterogeneity), and random effects models were employed if I2 ≥ 25% (moderate to high heterogeneity). The pooled return to play rate was 90.3%. The pooled rerupture rate as reported was 0.9% (best-case scenario 0.8% and worst-case scenario 6.8%). No meaningful subgroup analysis for rerupture rates could be performed based on the meta-regression. The pooled complication rate other than reruptures was 4.8%. The pooled infection rates were 0.3%, DVT rates were 1.6%, and sural nerve injury rates were 0.3%. Paratenon preserving techniques that are minimally invasive in nature demonstrated safe and favorable outcomes with high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR.

Single-Row Repair Versus Double-Row Repair in the Surgical Management of Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review.

Approximately 6% of people will report Achilles tendon pain during their lifetime, and one-third of these individuals will have Achilles insertional tendinopathy (AIT). For patients who have failed conservative treatment, surgical repair is performed. Achilles tendon repair can occur through various techniques, including a single-row or double-row repair. To determine if there are significant advantages to double-row repair over single-row repair with respect to biomechanical and clinical outcomes. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. An electronic search of the EMBASE and PubMed databases was performed for all studies related to surgical treatment of AIT, which yielded 1431 unique results. These included both biomechanical and clinical studies. Clinical studies in which patients were not diagnosed with AIT, underwent surgery for repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture, or studies that included additional procedures such as a concomitant flexor hallucis longus transfer were excluded. Eligible studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers. A risk-of-bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions and risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials tools. A total of 23 studies were included, 4 of which were biomechanical studies and 19 were clinical studies. Biomechanical comparison found that there was a significant advantage to using double-row versus single-row fixation with respect to load at yield (354.7 N vs 198.7 N; P = .01) and mean peak load (433.9 N vs 212 N; P = .042). There was no significant difference between double-row and single-row repair with respect to load to failure. Significant heterogeneity of the studies did not allow for a statistical comparison of the clinical outcomes between double-row and single-row repairs. Although biomechanical studies favor double-row repair for AIT, the current data available on the clinical outcomes are not sufficient to determine if there is a clinical advantage of double-row repair. Larger, prospective randomized controlled trials utilizing validated outcome measures are needed to further elucidate whether the biomechanical advantages associated with double-row repair also translate into improved patient-reported outcomes.

Surgical Management of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in the United States 2006-2020, an ABOS Part II Oral Examination Case List Database Study.

In correlation with a growing body of evidence regarding nonoperative management for Achilles tendon rupture (ATR), studies from Europe and Canada have displayed a decreasing incidence in surgical management, which has not been noted in the United States. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the US trend in ATR repair volume. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination Case List Database was used. All cases using Current Procedural Terminology codes for primary ATR repair were requested from the years 2006-2020. Total submitted Achilles repair volume, the number of candidates submitting an Achilles repair case, and the overall submitted case volume per examination year was analyzed. Poisson and linear regressions were used to determine statistically significant trends. The total number of Achilles repair cases submitted for the ABOS Part II Oral Examination significantly increased from 2006 to 2011 and then decreased until 2020. Taking Achilles repair cases as a proportion of total orthopaedic cases submitted, the same trend was seen. The number of candidates submitting an Achilles repair case increased from 2006 to 2009 and then decreased until 2020. Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained candidates submitted an increasing number of ATR repair cases per candidate during the time period studied. This is the first study to demonstrate a decline in the volume of ATR repair in the United States. The decline in ATR repair volume seen in the ABOS Part II Case Lists does not match previously published US surgeon practice patterns but is not necessarily generalizable to beyond this period. Although the overall ATR repair volume in the ABOS Part II Case Lists is decreasing, we found Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained surgeons are operating on an increasing number of ATRs during their board collection period. Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Long-term patient outcome is affected by deep venous thrombosis after Achilles tendon rupture repair.

The aim of the study was to examine the impact of a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) on patient outcomes 3 years after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) repair and if there were continued improvements between 1 and 3 years after surgery. A secondary aim was to determine risk factors associated with impaired patient outcomes in the long term. This cohort study consisted of 181 ATR-repaired patients, from two large randomized clinical trials, who attended a 3-year follow-up evaluation. Patients were postoperatively randomized to two different weight-bearing interventions compared with immobilization in a below-knee plaster cast for 2 weeks. During immobilization, screening for DVT was performed with Doppler ultrasound. At 1 and 3 years postoperatively, functional- and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated by the validated heel-rise test and self-reported questionnaire, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS). In total, 76 out of 181 (42%) patients exhibited a DVT at the 2- or 6-week screening after ATR surgery. Suffering from a DVT during immobilization resulted at 3 years in a worse limb symmetry index (LSI) of heel-rise total work compared to patients without DVT, adjusted for age (DVT mean LSI 68% vs. no DVT 78%, p = 0.027). At 3 years, patients with a DVT during immobilization displayed lower ATRS (DVT median 88 vs. no DVT 93, p = 0.046), which was not significant after adjustment for age. However, patients with DVT exhibited an improvement in ATRS, LSI total work, and LSI maximum height between 1 and 3 years, which was not seen among patients without DVT. Independent risk factors for reduced patient functional outcomes at 3 years were older age, greater calf muscle hypotrophy, and suffering a DVT. DVT during immobilization affects patients' long-term functional outcomes 3 years after ATR repair. Clinicians should adequately address risk factors contributing to impaired patient outcomes in the long term, including calf muscle hypotrophy, DVT, and older age. Level Ⅲ.

The Influence of Patient Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health on Postoperative Complications Following Achilles Tendon Rupture.

The influence of social determinants of health (SDH) on postoperative complications has been investigated in several studies, although correlation with Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) repair remains uninvestigated. SDH encompasses several factors, including insurance status and area-based measurements, including the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which ranks neighborhoods by social disadvantage. This study investigated the correlation between patient demographics, SDH, and complications following ATR repair. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 521 patients who presented with acute ATR and met the inclusion criteria, including age ≥18 years, a minimum of 30-day follow-up, and repair within 28 days of rupture. We reviewed patient demographics, time to surgery (TTS), and postoperative complications, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), rerupture, surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, and sural nerve injury. SDH variables included race, smoking status, insurance status, level of education, ADI, and SVI. Univariate regression tested the correlation between complications and SDH indicators. Significant variables (P < .05) were included in a multivariate regression. Sixty-eight complications occurred in 59 patients (11.3%). Multivariate regression showed that a higher ADI, that is, socially deprived individuals, was associated with lower rates of VTE (OR = 0.41, P = .04). Higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with rerupture (OR = 8.73, P < .01). Male patients had lower rates of wound dehiscence (OR = 0.31, P = .03) and VTE (OR = 0.32, P = .02) compared with women. Longer TTS correlated with sural nerve injuries (OR = 2.23, P < .01) and shorter TTS with reruptures (OR = 0.02, P = .02). Some measures of SDH were associated with postoperative complications. Gender also may have an effect, with male sex associated with lower rates of wound dehiscence and VTE. BMI was associated with higher rates of reruptures and overall general complications.

Fabrication of atelocollagen-coated bioabsorbable suture and the evaluation of its regenerative efficacy in Achilles tendon healing using a rat experimental model

Recently, the incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures (ATRs) has become more common, and repair surgery using a bioabsorbable suture is generally preferred, particularly in the case of healthy patients. Sutures composed of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) are commonly used in ATR surgeries. Nevertheless, owing to the inherent limitations of PLGA, novel bioabsorbable sutures that can accelerate Achilles tendon healing are sought. Recently, several studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of atelocollagen on tendon healing. In this study, poly(3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine) (pDOPA), a hydrophilic biomimetic material, was used to modify the hydrophobic surface of a PLGA suture (Vicryl, VC) for the stable coating of atelocollagen on its surface. The main objective was to fabricate an atelocollagen-coated VC suture and evaluate its performance in the healing of Achilles tendon using a rat model of open repair for ATR. Structural analyses of the surface-modified suture indicated that the collagen was successfully coated on the VC/pDOPA suture. Postoperative in vivo biomechanical analysis, histological evaluation, ultrastructural/morphological analyses, and western blotting confirmed that the tendons in the VC/pDOPA/Col group exhibit superior healing than those in the VC and VC/pDOPA groups after 1 and 6 weeks following the surgery. The this study suggests that atelocollagen-coated PLGA/pDOPA sutures are preferable for future medical applications, especially in the repair of ATR.

Commentary on 'Immediate mobilization after repair of Achilles tendon rupture may increase the incidence of re-rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'.

Commentary on 'Immediate mobilization after repair of Achilles tendon rupture may increase the incidence of re-rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials'.

All-inside endoscopic semiautomatic running locked stitch technique shows favourable outcomes for acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

The safety and reliability of endoscopic Achilles tendon rupture repair are still concerning aspects. This study's aim is to evaluate an all-inside endoscopic semiautomatic running locked stitch (Endo-SARLS) technique. Forty cases with acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated with the all-inside Endo-SARLS technique between 2020 and 2021. Under endoscopic control, the proximal tendon stumps were stitched with the running locked method using a semiautomatic flexible suture passer. The threads of the high-strength suture were grasped through the paratenon subspace and then fixed into calcaneal insertion with a knotless anchor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surgical timeand complications were assessed. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA)and Heel Rise Height Scale (HRHS) were utilised to evaluate final outcomes. The average follow-up time was 25.4 ± 0.4 (range: 24-32) months. Appropriate tendon regeneration was observed on MRI after 12 months. At the final follow-up, the median value of ATRS score was 95 (interquartile range: 94, 98). Furthermore, there is no significant difference between the injured and contralateral side in the average ATRA (18.2 ± 1.8 vs. 18.3 ± 1.9°, ns) and median value of HRHS [14.5 (13.3, 15.5) vs. 14.8 (13.5, 15.6) cm, ns]. No infection and nerve injuries were encountered. Thirty-ninepatients reported that they resumed casual sports activity after 6 months. One patient had a slight anchor cut-out, due to an addition injury, which was removed after 5 months. An all-inside Endo-SARLS technique showed promising clinical results for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. This procedure reduces the risk of sural nerve injuries while establishing a reliable connection between the tendon stumps. Level IV.

Immediate mobilization after repair of Achilles tendon rupture may increase the incidence of re-rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a significant injury that can require surgery and can have the risk of re-rupture even after successful treatment. Consequently, to minimize this risk, it is important to have a thorough understanding of the rehabilitation protocol and the impact of different rehabilitation approaches on preventing re-rupture. Two independent team members searched several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on operative treatment of ATR. We included articles that covered open or minimally invasive surgery for ATR, with a detailed rehabilitation protocol and reports of re-rupture. The study protocol has been registered at PROSPERO and has been reported in the line with PRISMA Guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C85, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C86 and assessed using AMSTAR Tool, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C87. A total of 43 RCTs were eligible for the meta-analysis, encompassing a combined cohort of 2553 patients. Overall, the postoperative incidence of ATR patients developing re-rupture was 3.15% (95% CI: 2.26-4.17; I2=44.48%). Early immobilization group patients who had ATR had a 4.07% (95% CI: 1.76-7.27; I2=51.20%) postoperative incidence of re-rupture; Early immobilization + active range of motion (AROM) group had an incidence of 5.95% (95% CI: 2.91-9.99; I2=0.00%); Early immobilization + weight-bearing group had an incidence of 3.49% (95% CI: 1.96-5.43; I2=20.06%); Early weight-bearing + AROM group had an incidence of 3.61% (95% CI: 1.00-7.73; I2= 64.60%); Accelerated rehabilitation (immobilization) group had an incidence of 2.18% (95% CI: 1.11-3.59; I2=21.56%); Accelerated rehabilitation (non-immobilization) group had a rate of 1.36% (95% CI: 0.12-3.90; I2=0.00%). Additionally, patients in the immediate AROM group had a postoperative re-rupture incidence of 3.92% (95% CI: 1.76-6.89; I2=33.24%); Non-immediate AROM group had an incidence of 2.45% (95% CI: 1.25-4.03; I2=22.09%). This meta-analysis suggests the use of accelerated rehabilitation intervention in early postoperative rehabilitation of the Achilles tendon. However, for early ankle joint mobilization, it is recommended to apply after one to two weeks of immobilization.

No difference in operative time, outcomes, cosmesis, or return to activity and/or sport after minimally invasive versus open repair of primary Achilles ruptures: a retrospective review.

To compare clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sport among patients that have undergone minimally invasive repair versus open approach of an acute Achilles tendon rupture. Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture at a single urban academic institution from 2017 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. Preinjury sport participation and preinjury work activity information, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the Tegner Activity Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for mobility and pain interference were collected. In total, 144 patients were initially included in the study. Of these, 63 patients were followed with a mean follow-up of 45.3 ± 29.2months. The mean operative time did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.938). Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair returned to sport at a rate of 88.9% at a mean of 10.6 ± 5.8months, compared to return rate of open procedures of 83.7% at 9.5 ± 5.5months. There were no significant differences in ATRS (p = 0.246), Tegner (p = 0.137) or VAS pain (p = 0.317) scores between groups. There was no difference in cosmetic satisfaction between PARS and open repair groups (88.4 vs. 76.0; p = 0.244). Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures demonstrate no significant differences with respect to cosmesis, operative time, patient-reported outcomes and the rate and level of return to activities when compared to an open approach. III.

Primary Repair of Achilles Tendon Rupture Using a Mini-incision: A Novel Technique

The use of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of primary Achilles rupture has become more popular in the past few decades as they have been associated with a lower wound complication rate. Most of the techniques demand the use of procedure-specific instruments and are designed mainly for midsubstance lesions. This article aims to present a novel technique for Achilles tendon repair that can be used for both insertional and midsubstance ruptures, using a mini-incision and with no special instruments required. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level V.

Long-term results and complication following Achilles tendon rupture repair

Introduction Currently,there is no consensus regarding optimal treatment options of Achilles tendon rupture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long term results of Achilles tendon repair using different surgical techniques, assess complication rate and subjective satisfactionMethods The study included patients treated for Achilles tendon rupture using minimally invasive and open surgical repair. Complications including re-rupture, infection, deep vein thrombosis and neuropraxia were identified. In order to evaluate the factors influencing the risk of postoperative complications, logistic regression analysis was performed. The Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) evaluated subjective outcomes.Results 130 patients with Achilles tendon tear were enrolled (123 primary and 7 revision cases). In primary repairs percutaneous technique was used in 60 % of cases (74/123), mini open technique – in 16 % (19/123), and open technique – in 24 % (30/123). Re-rupture occurred in 2.4 % of patients treated with minimally invasive techniques. There were no repeated ruptures following open repairs. Predominant number of infections was registered after open repairs and made 10 %, while minimally invasive techniques had 3.2 % of infections. Logistic regression analyses showed that steroid injection, open repair, application of tapes and autografts increased the risk of infectious complications. There were no significant differences in ATRS and AOFAS scores between different primary Achilles tendon repair techniques (p &gt; 0.05).Discussion Results, obtained in the current study, are consistent with previously published data.Conclusions Open Achilles tendon repair showed a higher rate of infections, and lower rate of re-ruptures. The anamnesis of steroid injection, open repair, application of tapes and autografts increases the risk of infectious complications.

Comparison of percutaneous and open repair of Achilles tendon rupture: results and complications from a single institution

BackgroundThe Achilles tendon is the strongest tendon in the human body, but it is prone to injury, especially in modern times when recreational sports are growing in popularity. As a result, Achilles tendon rupture is becoming an increasingly common medical problem in modern society. The main objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of percutaneous repair and open repair for the treatment of Achilles tendon rupture.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted involving a total of 316 patients who had undergone surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture between 2013 and 2021. The data collected from the medical history of these patients included the type of surgical procedure, the mechanism of injury, the age and sex of the patients, the time spent in the hospital, and any possible complications of the surgical treatment (such as infections, reruptures, or sural nerve injuries).ResultsThe study revealed that there was no significant difference between percutaneous and open surgical approaches in terms of sural nerve injury. However, there was a statistically significant advantage of the percutaneous method in terms of the number of infections, which was significantly lower than that of the open method. Additionally, the median length of hospital stay was found to be four days longer with the open approach. However, the study noted that a statistically significant advantage of the percutaneous method for rerupture could not be established due to the small number of patients with rerupture and the insufficient ratio of patients with rerupture in relation to the size of the observed population.ConclusionsPercutaneous repair is an effective treatment option for Achilles tendon rupture and has outcomes equal to or better than those of open repair. Therefore, this approach is recommended as the preferred method of treatment due to the presence of fewer complications, provided that the indications for this technique are appropriate.