Acetabular Shell Research Articles

Evaluation of Hydrogen Permeation in Fretting Corrosion Interfaces with Ti-6Al-4V Alloy and Varying Lubricants Using a Modified Devanathan-Stachurski Cell

Titanium alloys are commonly used in biomedical applications for structural components such as hip femoral stems and acetabular cup shells. Whilst the fretting-corrosion degradation of titanium (Ti)-alloys has been well documented, the role of hydrogen permeation within these contacts has not received much attention despite evidence in clinical retrieval studies. This is likely due to the complexity of measurement and simulation. The aim of this study was to better understand the effect of tribological and electrochemical mechanisms on hydrogen permeation. A novel detection cell based on the Devanathan-Stachurski (DS) cell was designed to investigate hydrogen permeation in fretting corrosion contacts found in titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy. Hydrogen permeation was found to be dependent on the amplitude of fretting displacement. Hydrogen permeation was not detected at lower amplitudes (10 and 50 μm); whereas, a significant increase in hydrogen permeation was found at 150 μm displacements. Furthermore, hydrogen permeation was found to be affected by the components of the tested physiological saline solution. Presence of hydrogen permeation was noticed in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) and physiological saline combined with albumin protein. However, the amount of permeated hydrogen was reduced (38%) when hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was added. While corrosion rate and hydrogen permeation increased (6%) significantly when both albumin and H2O2 were added to the solution. These results show that fretting induced hydrogen ingress can be simulated and detected in situ within simulated aqueous environments. Furthermore, a framework to assess the interactions between fretting and hydrogen ingress, which can be translated to other industrial challenges, has been developed.

Use of a Novel Reverse Hip Replacement System to Address Dislocation and Instability.

While total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an enormously successful treatment for patients with end-stage degenerative arthritis of the hip, and surgeons have optimized existing hip implants and techniques, dislocation and instability persist as a leading cause of failure. Given the tremendous success of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in enhancing the stability of shoulder reconstruction by reversing the anatomic seating of the ball and socket components, one manufacturer (Hip Innovation Technology, LLC, Woodstock, Georgia) has developed a novel Reverse Hip Replacement System (Reverse HRS) to address the need for greater stability in reconstruction of the arthritic hip joint. Rather than the traditional anatomic components that replace the head of the femur with a spherical ball and the acetabulum with a socket with polyethylene liner mounted into the pelvis, the Reverse HRS features a cup with polyethylene liner attached to the femoral stem and a spherical metal head attached to a central trunnion inside of the porous-coated acetabular shell fixed into the pelvis. This design provides dramatically enhanced stability and improved range of motion. This article reviews relevant published literature, including results from a Canadian clinical trial and case reports from a multicenter American clinical trial monitored by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. It also describes the components and surgical technique of reverse THA.

Polyethylene liner dissociation in cementless total hip arthroplasty: Ensuring accurate diagnosis.

Uncemented acetabular components are widely used in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA). Modularity has numerous advantages including the ability to use supplementary screw fixation for the shell, and allow to switch from ceramic to polyethylene (PE) bearings and vice versa, and the use of lipped and face-changing liners. Despite these advantages, a problem with modular PE liners is dissociation. This is a rare complication in modern implants. The rate of liner dissociation is reported to be very low between 0.17% and 0.8%. Typical symptoms are sudden onset of groin pain in a previously well-functioning hip joint, followed by grinding or clicking sensations during hip joint motions indicating, that the femoral head is articulating with the metal acetabular shell rather than with the PE liner. Any newly observed noise or squeaking from a THA should undergo radiographic investigation to exclude liner dissociation. We present the case of an 88-yearold male patient who developed PE liner dissociation in a cementless THA with a Pinnacle acetabular component six years after the index operation. We recommended revision of the left hip, which was performed two days later. In the interim, the patient was advised to use a pair of crutches. During revision surgery, it was observed that the metal head made contact with the cementless cup shell without damaging it from a macroscopic standpoint. Consequently, a simple exchange of the PE liner was conducted, and a 36 mm metal head was implanted due to scratches on the original head. Early diagnosis facilitates a straightforward exchange of the liner along with the head, potentially preserving the osseous integrated cup shell and stem integrity. Routine radiologic follow-up allows to distinguish between PE liner dissociation and severe PE wear.

Outcomes of a Novel Modular Porous Acetabular Shell in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Outcomes of a Novel Modular Porous Acetabular Shell in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Reduction in rate of implant waste associated with robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Implant waste during total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a significant cost to the USA healthcare system. While studies have explored methods to improve THA cost-effectiveness, the literature comparing the proportions of implant waste by intraoperative technology used during THA is limited. The aims of this study were to: 1) examine whether the use of enabling technologies during THA results in a smaller proportion of wasted implants compared to navigation-guided and conventional manual THA; 2) determine the proportion of wasted implants by implant type; and 3) examine the effects of surgeon experience on rates of implant waste by technology used. We identified 104,420 implants either implanted or wasted during 18,329 primary THAs performed on 16,724 patients between January 2018 and June 2022 at our institution. THAs were separated by technology used: robotic-assisted (n = 4,171), imageless navigation (n = 6,887), and manual (n = 7,721). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of implant waste during primary THA. Robotic-assisted THA resulted in a lower proportion (1.5%) of implant waste compared to navigation-guided THA (2.0%) and manual THA (1.9%) (all p < 0.001). Both navigated and manual THA were more likely to waste acetabular shells (odds ratio (OR) 4.5 vs 3.1) and polyethylene liners (OR 2.2 vs 2.0) compared to robotic-assisted THA after adjusting for demographic and perioperative factors, such as surgeon experience (p < 0.001). While implant waste decreased with increasing experience for procedures performed manually (p < 0.001) or with navigation (p < 0.001), waste rates for robotic-assisted THA did not differ based on surgical experience. Robotic-assisted THAs wasted a smaller proportion of acetabular shells and polyethylene liners than navigation-guided and manual THAs. Individual implant waste rates vary depending on the type of technology used intraoperatively. Future studies on implant waste during THA should examine reasons for non-implantation in order to better understand and develop methods for cost-saving.

A NOVEL MAGNETIC SYSTEM TO TREAT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY INSTABILITY

Dislocation after total hip replacement (THR) is a devastating complication. Risk factors include patient and surgical factors. Mitigation of this complication has proven partially effective. This study investigated a new innovating technique to decrease this problem using rare earth magnets.Computer simulations with design and magnetic finite element analysis software were used to analyze and quantitate the forces around hip implants with embedded magnets into the components during hip range of motion. N52 Neodymium-Iron-Boron rare earth magnets were sized to fit within the existing acetabular shells and the taper of a hip system. Additionally, magnets placed within the existing screw holes were studied. A 50mm titanium acetabular shell and a 36mm ceramic liner utilizing a taper sleeve adapter were modeled which allowed for the use of a 12mm × 5mm magnet placed in the center hole, an 18mm × 15mm magnet within the femoral head, and 10mm × 5mm magnets in the screw holes.Biomechanical testing was also performed using in-vitro bone and implant models to determine retention forces through a range of hip motion.The novel system incorporating magnets generated retentive forces between the acetabular cup and femoral head of between 10 to 20 N through a range of hip motion. Retentive forces were stronger at the extreme position hip range of motion when additional magnets were placed in the acetabular screw holes. Greater retentive forces can be obtained with specially designed femoral head bores and acetabular shells specifically designed to incorporate larger magnets. Mechanical testing validated the loads obtained and demonstrated the feasibility of the magnet system to provide joint stability and prevent dislocations.Rare earth magnets provide exceptional attractive strength and can be used to impart stability and prevent dislocation in THR without the complications and limitations of conventional methods.

Debonding of Porous Coating: A Late Failure Mode of Uncemented, Partially Threaded Acetabular Components—Retrieval Analysis

Titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) porous coatings have been used in total hip arthroplasty for decades. They are considered reliable, and very few failure cases have been described so far. This retrieval study described a series of 20 acetabular components—where total or partial debonding occurred during in vivo use and aimed to explain the underlying failure mechanisms. Implants were examined using optical and electron microscopy (SEM), metallographic sections of retrievals were prepared while pathologic samples of periprosthetic tissues were examined for presence of wear debris. Data from metallographic slides indicated that debonding was initiated at free borders of the coating and tended to progress at the interface between the TPS layer and the shell. In some cases, total debonding occurred leading material wear of both the TPS layer and acetabular shell leading to massive release of metallic debris and accelerated polyethylene wear in third body mechanism. SEM examination demonstrated that splats forming the TPS layer exhibited features suggesting a high temperature gradient between the plasma sprayed layer and the substrate material existed, leading to porosity of splats and suboptimal bonding strength. This study demonstrated that coating application parameters and certain design features (screw holes, fins) may promote long-term failure due to debonding. Surgeons should be aware of this complication as it is most likely underreported, while manufacturers should consider more rigorous pre-clinical testing as suboptimal coating bonding may result in failures during long-term clinical use.

Removal of uncemented components: hope for the best, prepare for the worst-technical tips and tricks.

Removing well-fixed uncemented components can be challenging. With thoughtful surgical planning, appropriate surgical instruments, and proper surgical techniques, most implants can be removed expeditiously with little bone loss and minimal impact on the subsequent reconstruction. Preoperative planning is one of the most essential steps to remove uncemented implants. Obtaining previous surgical records, although tedious, should always be attempted preoperatively to determine if specific instruments will be required and to help anticipate which steps may need special attention. These include the presence of ceramic or metal bearings and the presence of acetabular screws or stem collars. Without proper preparation and available tools, the removal of implants can negatively impact the subsequent reconstruction and patient outcomes. We will describe techniques and practical tips for removing uncemented stems from the top (intramedullary) or transfemoral using an extended trochanteric osteotomy. We will also describe techniques and tools to remove uncemented acetabular shells efficiently. Case examples will highlight these clinical situations where careful planning is necessary and potential problems that may be encountered with the recurring theme of preparing for the worst but hoping for the best. We have also included cases such as removing well-fixed cementless collared stems, broken stems, and fully coated stems.

A case report: Posterior acetabular deficiency treated with femoral head autograft and hybrid total hip arthroplasty

As a choice for treating acetabular deficiencies, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is beset with many drawbacks, particularly in relation to untreated fractures and post-surgery complications. Furthermore, it is hard to ensure long-term fixation of the acetabular shell. In our case, a 52-year-old male manual laborer presented with complaints of a painful limp of the left lower limb with gross restriction of movements in the left hip joint. Previously, the patient had undergone open reduction and posterior acetabular wall plate fixation 2 years back and implant exit had been done 1 year before due to complaints of pain. We treated the patient with hybrid THA. To rectify the acetabular defect, we used a femoral head autograft, securing it with screws, and supporting it with a plate posteriorly. After 1 year, there was good graft consolidation sans acetabular component displacement as evidenced by radiography. A Harris hip score of 79.7 indicated good functionality. Therefore, hybrid THA with reconstruction is a good option for treating post-traumatic arthritis with acetabular wall deficiencies. Although the procedure is difficult to carry out, it yields better results in terms of lessened pain, enhanced stability, and better functionality.

Acetabular component liner exchange with highly crosslinked polyethylene for wear and osteolysis.

Isolated acetabular liner exchange with a highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) component is an option to address polyethylene wear and osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the presence of a well-fixed acetabular shell. The liner can be fixed either with the original locking mechanism or by being cemented within the acetabular component. Whether the method used for fixation of the HXLPE liner has any bearing on the long-term outcomes is still unclear. Data were retrieved for all patients who underwent isolated acetabular component liner exchange surgery with a HXLPE component in our institute between August 2000 and January 2015. Patients were classified according to the fixation method used (original locking mechanism (n = 36) or cemented (n = 50)). Survival and revision rates were compared. A total of 86 revisions were performed and the mean duration of follow-up was 13 years. A total of 20 patients (23.3%) had complications, with dislocation alone being the most common (8.1%; 7/86). Ten patients (11.6%) required re-revision surgery. Cementing the HXLPE liner (8.0%; 4/50) had a higher incidence of re-revision due to acetabular component liner-related complications than using the original locking mechanism (0%; 0/36; p = 0.082). Fixation using the original locking mechanism was associated with re-revision due to acetabular component loosening (8.3%; 3/36), compared to cementing (0%; 0/50; p = 0.038). Overall estimated mean survival was 19.2 years. There was no significant difference in the re-revision rate between the original locking mechanism (11.1%; 4/36) and cementing (12.0%; 6/50; p = 0.899). Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the revision-free survival of HXLPE fixed with the original locking mechanism and cementing was 94.1% and 93.2%, respectively, at ten years, and 84.7% and 81.3%, respectively, at 20 years (p = 0.840). The re-revision rate and the revision-free survival following acetabular component liner exchange revision surgery using the HXLPE liner were not influenced by the fixation technique used. Both techniques were associated with good survival at a mean follow-up of 13 years. Careful patient selection is necessary for isolated acetabular component liner exchange revision surgery in order to achieve the best outcomes.

Fretting and Tribocorrosion of Modular Dual Mobility Liners: Role of Design, Microstructure, and Malseating

BackgroundModular dual mobility (DM) bearings have a junction between a cobalt chrome alloy (CoCrMo) liner and titanium shell, and the risk of tribocorrosion at this interface remains a concern. The purpose of this study was to determine whether liner malseating and liner designs are associated with taper tribocorrosion. MethodsWe evaluated 28 retrieved modular DM implants with a mean in situ duration of 14.6 months (range, 1 to 83). There were 2 manufacturers included (12 and 16 liners, respectively). Liners were considered malseated if a distinct divergence between the liner and shell was present on postoperative radiographs. Tribocorrosion was analyzed qualitatively with the modified Goldberg Score and quantitatively with an optical coordinate-measuring machine. An acetabular shell per manufacturer was sectioned for metallographic analysis. ResultsThere were 6 implants (22%) that had severe grade 4 corrosion, 6 (22%) had moderate grade 3, 11 (41%) had mild grade 2, and 5 (18.5%) had grade 1 or no visible corrosion. The average volumetric material loss at the taper was 0.086 ± 0.19 mm3. There were 7 liners (25%) that had radiographic evidence of malseating, and all were of a single design (P = .01). The 2 liner designs were fundamentally different from one another with respect to the cobalt chrome alloy type, taper surface finish, and shape deviations. Malseating was an independent risk factor for increased volumetric material loss (P = .017). ConclusionsDM tribocorrosion with quantifiable material loss occurred more commonly in malseated liners. Specific design characteristics may make liners more prone to malseating, and the interplay between seating mechanics, liner characteristics, and patient factors likely contributes to the shell/liner tribocorrosion environment. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

Cemented dual-mobility constructs in uncemented revision acetabular components.

Dislocation remains a leading cause of failure following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). While dual-mobility (DM) bearings have been shown to mitigate this risk, options are limited when retaining or implanting an uncemented shell without modular DM options. In these circumstances, a monoblock DM cup, designed for cementing, can be cemented into an uncemented acetabular shell. The goal of this study was to describe the implant survival, complications, and radiological outcomes of this construct. We identified 64 patients (65 hips) who had a single-design cemented DM cup cemented into an uncemented acetabular shell during revision THA between 2018 and 2020 at our institution. Cups were cemented into either uncemented cups designed for liner cementing (n = 48; 74%) or retained (n = 17; 26%) acetabular components. Median outer head diameter was 42 mm. Mean age was 69 years (SD 11), mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 8), and 52% (n = 34) were female. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Mean follow-up was two years (SD 0.97). There were nine cemented DM cup revisions: three for periprosthetic joint infection, three for acetabular aseptic loosening from bone, two for dislocation, and one for a broken cup-cage construct. The two-year survivals free of aseptic DM revision and dislocation were both 92%. There were five postoperative dislocations, all in patients with prior dislocation or abductor deficiency. On radiological review, the DM cup remained well-fixed at the cemented interface in all but one case. While dislocation was not eliminated in this series of complex revision THAs, this technique allowed for maximization of femoral head diameter and optimization of effective acetabular component position during cementing. Of note, there was only one failure at the cemented interface.

Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip replacement: a narrative literature review.

Due to growing numbers of primary total hip replacement (THR), the revision THR burden is also increasing. Common indications for revision are osteolysis, infection, instability, and mechanical failure of implants, which can cause acetabular bone loss. Massive acetabular bone defects and pelvic discontinuity are extremely challenging problems. Many techniques have been utilized to address bone loss while maintaining a stable revision THR. Structural allografts, cemented prosthesis, reconstruction cages, and custom triflanged implants have all been used successfully albeit with relatively high complications rates. We have tried to highlight emerging trends to utilize Custom Made Monoflange or Triflange Acetabular Components to reconstruct massive acetabular defects with favourable midterm implant survival, better functional outcomes, relatively lesser complications, and almost similar cost of prosthesis as compared to conventional reconstruction techniques. However, long-term data and study is still recommended to draw a definitive conclusion. In this narrative review article, we searched PubMed and Cochrane for studies on managing acetabular bone loss in revision THR with a focus on recent literature for mid to long-term outcomes and compared results from various studies on different reconstruction methods. Hemispherical cementless acetabular prosthesis with supplemental screws are commonly utilized to manage mild to moderate acetabular bone loss. Recent trends have shown much interest and paradigm shift in patient specific custom triflange acetabular components (CTAC) for reconstructing massive acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. Studies have reported high patient satisfaction, improved patient reported daily functioning, high mid-term implant survival, similar complications, and encouraging all cause re-revision rate. However, more prospective and quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the superiority of CTACs over conventional acetabular implants. There is no consensus regarding the best option for reconstructing massive acetabular defects. Thorough preoperative workup and planning is an absolute requirement for successful revision THR. While most of the moderate acetabular bone loss can be managed with cementless hemispherical acetabular shells with excellent long-term outcomes, reconstructing massive acetabular bone defects in revision THR remains a challenge. Depending on the size and location of the defect, various constucts have demonstrated long-term success as discussed in this review, but complications are not negligible. CTACs provide a treatment for massive bone loss that may be otherwise difficult to achieve anatomic stability with other constructs. Although long-term data is sparse, the cost and complication rate is comparable to other reconstruction methods.

Technical note for intraoperative determination of proper acetabular cup size in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Selecting the optimal size of components is crucial when performing a primary total hip arthroplasty. Implanting the accurate size of the acetabular component can occasionally be exacting, chiefly for surgeons with little experience, whilst the complications of imprecise acetabular sizing or over-reaming can be potentially devastating. To assist clinicians intraoperatively with a simple and repeatable tip in elucidating the ambivalence when determining the proper acetabular component size is not straightforwardly achieved, specifically when surgeons are inexperienced or preoperative templating is unavailable. This method was employed in 263 operations in our department from June 2021 to December 2022. All operations were performed by the same team of joint reconstruction surgeons, employing a typical posterior hip approach technique. The types of acetabular shells implanted were: The Dynasty® acetabular cup system (MicroPort Orthopedics, Shanghai, China) and the R3® acetabular system (Smith & Nephew, Watford, United Kingdom), which both feature cementless press-fit design. The mean value of all cases was calculated and collated with each other. We distinguished as oversized an implanted acetabular shell when its size was > 2 mm larger than the size of the acetabular size indicator reamer (ASIR) or when the implanted shell was larger than 4 mm compared to the preoperative planned cup. The median size of the implanted acetabular shell was 52 (48-54) mm, while the median size of the preoperatively planned cup was 50 (48-56) mm, and the median size of the ASIR was 52 (50-54) mm. The correlation coefficient between ASIR size and implanted acetabular component size exhibited a high positive correlation with r = 0.719 (P < 0.001). Contrariwise, intraoperative ASIR measurements precisely predicted the implanted cups' size or differed by only one size (2 mm) in 245 cases. In our study, we demonstrated that the size of the first acetabular reamer not entering freely in the acetabular rim corroborates the final acetabular component size to implant. This was also corresponding in the majority of the cases with conventional preoperative templating. It can be featured as a valid tool for avoiding the potentially pernicious complications of acetabular cup over-reaming and over-sizing in primary total hip arthroplasty. It is a simple and reproducible technical note useful for confirming the predicted acetabular cup size preoperatively; thus, its application could be considered routinely, even in cases where preoperative templating is unavailable.

“Cup-in-Cup” for revision cup in total hip arthroplasty – An innovative technique

In a revision hip surgery with isolated poly-ethylene liner wear along with a stable acetabular shell involves difficult decision of revising the entire acetabular component or just the liner. However, unavailability of the similar poly liner in a high risk patient can be dealt with a novel technique of cup in cup by retaining the stable shell and cementing a polyethylene liner over it. A 77-year-old male came with complains of pain in the right hip and limp of 4 months duration after 17 years of a revision hip surgery. Poly-ethylene liner was found worn out intraoperative with both the metal shell and the stem very stable. Same company poly liner was not available. In order to prevent the extensive revision in a high surgical risk patient and to prevent the blood and the bone loss, a new Elite poly-ethylene cement cup was cemented over the old stable cementless metal shell. At 3 years short term follow up patient is able to walk pain free independently. The “cup-in-cup” technique with cemented PE cup into a retained well-fixed and well-positioned metal shell is a good technique in high surgical risk patients and gives promising result at short term follow up.

Implementing Machine Learning approaches for accelerated prediction of bone strain in acetabulum of a hip joint

The Finite Element (FE) methods for biomechanical analysis involving implant design and subject parameters for musculoskeletal applications are extensively reported in literature. Such an approach is manually intensive and computationally expensive with longer simulations times. Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) based approaches are implemented to a limited extent in biomechanics, such approaches to predict bone strain in acetabulum of a hip joint, are hardly explored. In this context, the primary objective of this paper is to evaluate machine learning (ML) models in tandem with high-fidelity FEA data for the accelerated prediction of the biomechanical response in the acetabulum of the human hip joint, during the walking gait. The parameters used in the FEA study included the subject weight, number and distribution of fins on the periphery of the acetabular shell, bone condition and phases of the gait cycle. The biomechanical response has also been evaluated using three different acetabular liners, including pre-clinically validated HDPE-20% HA-20% Al2O3, highly-crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (HC-UHMWPE) and ZrO2-toughened Al2O3 (ZTA). Such parametric variation in FEA analysis, involving 26 variables and a full factorial design resulted in 10,752 datasets for spatially varying bone strains. The bone condition, as opposed to subject weight, was found to play a statistically significant role in determining the strain response in the periprosthetic bone of the acetabulum. While utilising hyperparameter tuning, K-fold cross validation and statistical learning approaches, a number of ML models were trained on the FEA dataset, and the Random Forest model performed the best with a coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.99/0.97 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.02/0.01 on the training/test dataset. Taken together, this study establishes the potential of ML approach as a fast surrogate of FEA for implant biomechanics analysis, in less than a minute.

A novel primary stability test method for artificial acetabular shells considering vertical load during level walking and shell position.

Uncemented acetabular shell primary stability is essential for optimal clinical outcomes. Push-out testing, rotation testing, and lever-out testing are major evaluation methods of primary stability between the shell and bone. However, these test methods do not consider shell loads during daily activity and shell installation angle. This study proposes a novel evaluation method of acetabular shell primary stability considering load during level walking and acetabular installation angles such as inclination and anteversion. To achieve this, a novel primary stability test apparatus was designed with a shell position of 40° acetabular inclination and 20° anteversion. The vertical load, corresponding to walking load, was set to 3 kN according to ISO 14242-1, which is the wear test standard for artificial hip joints. The vertical load was applied by an air cylinder controlled by a pressure-type electro-pneumatic proportional valve, with the vertical load value monitored by a load cell. Torque was measured when angular displacement was applied in the direction of extension during the application of vertical load. For comparison, we also measured torque using the traditional lever-out test. The novel primary stability test yielded significantly higher primary stabilities; 5.4 times greater than the lever-out test results. The novel primary stability test failure mode was more similar to the clinical failure than the traditional lever-out test. It is suggested that this novel primary stability test method, applying physiological walking loads and extension motions to the acetabular shell, better reflects in vivo primary stability than the traditional lever-out test.

Evaluation and Management of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-year Update.

Acetabular bone loss continues to be one of the most complex and challenging scenarios facing the orthopaedic surgeon. Preoperative planning and classification systems essentially have remained the same, with the Paprosky classification still being the most commonly used. Careful radiological assessment with well-defined criteria can accurately diagnose acetabular bone loss patterns with an associated chronic pelvic discontinuity before surgery. The use of cemented reconstruction techniques has declined, and contemporary practice trends have involved the increasing use of highly porous hemispherical shells in conjunction with modular porous metal augments, which can successfully treat most acetabular revisions. Noncemented treatment options for the management of acetabular bone loss during revision include conventional porous/modular highly porous hemispherical implants, nonmodular highly porous implants with cementable acetabular liners, cup-cage reconstruction, oblong cups, and triflange reconstruction. These options can be combined with modular porous metal augments, structural allografts, impaction grafting, or reconstruction cages. Acetabular distraction is a newer technique for chronic pelvic discontinuity, which is used in conjunction with off-the-shelf revision acetabular shells and modular porous metal augments. This review is an update over the past decade, highlighting studies with mid to long-term follow-up, and presents the advantages, disadvantages, and principles associated with each of the most commonly used reconstructive techniques.

Two-Year Outcomes of Novel Dual-Mobility Implant in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Dual-mobility (DM) implants for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have gained popularity due to their potential to reduce hip instability and dislocation events that may lead to revision surgery. These implants consist of a femoral head articulated within a polyethylene liner, which articulates within an outer acetabular shell, creating a dual-bearing surface. Our study aimed to report our observations on the survivorship of a novel DM implant for primary total hip arthroplasty at two years. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study to assess the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a THA with a novel DM implant (OR3O acetabular system™, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN) from January 2020 to September 2021. Patient demographics, surgical information, and survivorship data were collected from medical records for patients with a minimum of two years of follow-up. Primary outcomes included overall implant survivorship at two years as well as aseptic survivorship, revision rates of the DM acetabular shell, and average time to revision. Patient-reported outcomes were collected in the form of HOOS JR. A total of 250 hips in 245 patients had a minimum two-year follow-up. Primary osteoarthritis (80%) was the most common indication for index THA. The average aseptic survivorship of the DM acetabular components at two years for the cohort was 98.4% and survivorship of the acetabular implants overall was 97.6%. There were a total of four (1.6%) aseptic revisions of the DM acetabular component. Reasons for aseptic acetabular revision included one case of instability, one intraprosthetic dislocation, one periprosthetic acetabular fracture, and one malpositioned acetabular cup resulting in impingement. The mean time of follow-up was 893.9 days. Eighty-seven patients had preoperative and two-year HOOS JR available. HOOS JR improved by an average of 38.5 points. This novel DM acetabular implant demonstrates excellent survivorship at two years follow-up with low rates of instability and intraprosthetic dislocation and no episodes of metal-on-metal corrosion. Use of the DM implant demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at two years.

Dual Mobility Articulation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mixed Femoral and Acetabular Components are a Feasible Option

BackgroundThe utilization of a different manufacturer for the prosthetic femoral head and the polyethylene insert in dual mobility (DM) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be necessary, especially in the revision setting. However, there is no data in the literature about this application. This study evaluated the outcomes of mixed manufacturer components, with the hypothesis that there would be no difference in measured outcomes compared to matched components. MethodsThe DM articulations implanted during THA revision were retrospectively reviewed from 2011 to 2017. The study group was then stratified into 2 cohorts: matching components or mixed components. Of 130 hips included in the study with DM articulations with average follow-up of 7 years, 103 had mixed and 27 had matching manufacturer components. Rates of all cause reoperation and revision, intraprosthetic dislocation, dislocation, and aseptic loosening were compared using Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test; survival analysis was also performed. ResultsMatched and mixed manufacturer implants had no significant difference between all cause reoperation (33 versus 25.2%), dislocation (14.8 versus 7.7%), and aseptic loosening (3.7 versus 3.9%), respectively. Higher rates of intraprosthetic dislocation (11 versus 0.97%) were observed in the matching component cohort. Survival analysis showed similar outcomes at 2, 5, and 10 years. ConclusionsMixed-component DM articulations show similar results compared to matching components. The off-label use of mixed manufacture DM articulation in THA is a feasible and safe option in the correct patient. Furthermore, when encountering a well-fixed femoral stem or acetabular shell, the use of a mixed component DM articulations may reduce the morbidity for the patient and prevent revision of all components.